Opened 10 years ago

Closed 10 years ago

Last modified 7 years ago

#134 closed editorial (fixed)

RFC822 reference left in discussion of date formats

Reported by: julian.reschke@… Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: 06
Component: p1-messaging Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:

Description

There's one reference left to RFC 822 in the discussion of date formats (Section 3.3.1):

"The first format is preferred as an Internet standard and represents a fixed-length subset of that defined by [RFC1123] (an update to [RFC822])."

Can we just drop the reference to RFC 822 (which has been updated twice in the meantime)?

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by fielding@…

I think we should drop that reference.

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…

  • Milestone changed from unassigned to 06

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Fixed in [384]:

Resolve #134: remove unneeded reference to RFC 822 (closes #134)

comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by mnot@…

  • Priority set to normal
  • Severity changed from Candidate WG Document to Active WG Document
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.