Changeset 96


Ignore:
Timestamp:
22/12/07 19:14:28 (13 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

Add "Requirements" subsection everywhere (including reference to RFC2119), add missing bcp14 markup.

Location:
draft-ietf-httpbis/latest
Files:
14 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.html

    r95 r96  
    634634      <h2 id="rfc.section.1.2"><a href="#rfc.section.1.2">1.2</a>&nbsp;<a id="intro.requirements" href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></h2>
    635635      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
    636          in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>.
     636         in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>.
    637637      </p>
    638638      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.2">An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level and all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> level requirements but not all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
    … …  
    987987         the proxy/gateway <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> either downgrade the request version, or respond with an error, or switch to tunnel behavior.
    988988      </p>
    989       <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.8">Due to interoperability problems with HTTP/1.0 proxies discovered since the publication of RFC 2068 <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a>, caching proxies MUST, gateways <em class="bcp14">MAY</em>, and tunnels <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> upgrade the request to the highest version they support. The proxy/gateway's response to that request <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be in the same major version as the request.
     989      <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.8">Due to interoperability problems with HTTP/1.0 proxies discovered since the publication of RFC 2068 <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a>, caching proxies <em class="bcp14">MUST</em>, gateways <em class="bcp14">MAY</em>, and tunnels <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> upgrade the request to the highest version they support. The proxy/gateway's response to that request <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be in the same major version as the request.
    990990      </p>
    991991      <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.9"> </p>
    … …  
    16101610      <p id="rfc.section.8.1.p.10">An HTTP/1.1 server that does not support persistent connections <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> include the "close" connection option in every response message that does not have a 1xx (informational) status code.
    16111611      </p>
    1612       <p id="rfc.section.8.1.p.11">A system receiving an HTTP/1.0 (or lower-version) message that includes a Connection header MUST, for each connection-token
    1613          in this field, remove and ignore any header field(s) from the message with the same name as the connection-token. This protects
    1614          against mistaken forwarding of such header fields by pre-HTTP/1.1 proxies. See <a href="#compatibility.with.http.1.0.persistent.connections" title="Compatibility with HTTP/1.0 Persistent Connections">Appendix&nbsp;D.2</a>.
     1612      <p id="rfc.section.8.1.p.11">A system receiving an HTTP/1.0 (or lower-version) message that includes a Connection header <em class="bcp14">MUST</em>, for each connection-token in this field, remove and ignore any header field(s) from the message with the same name as the
     1613         connection-token. This protects against mistaken forwarding of such header fields by pre-HTTP/1.1 proxies. See <a href="#compatibility.with.http.1.0.persistent.connections" title="Compatibility with HTTP/1.0 Persistent Connections">Appendix&nbsp;D.2</a>.
    16151614      </p>
    16161615      <div id="rfc.iref.c.7"></div>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.xml

    r95 r96  
    283283   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
    284284   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
    285    document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
     285   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
    286286</t>
    287287<t>
    … …  
    983983<t>
    984984   Due to interoperability problems with HTTP/1.0 proxies discovered
    985    since the publication of RFC 2068 <xref target="RFC2068"/>, caching proxies MUST, gateways
     985   since the publication of RFC 2068 <xref target="RFC2068"/>, caching proxies &MUST;, gateways
    986986   &MAY;, and tunnels &MUST-NOT; upgrade the request to the highest version
    987987   they support. The proxy/gateway's response to that request &MUST; be in
    … …  
    22522252<t>
    22532253   A system receiving an HTTP/1.0 (or lower-version) message that
    2254    includes a Connection header MUST, for each connection-token in this
     2254   includes a Connection header &MUST;, for each connection-token in this
    22552255   field, remove and ignore any header field(s) from the message with
    22562256   the same name as the connection-token. This protects against mistaken
    … …  
    37133713
    37143714<reference anchor="RFC2119">
    3715 <front>
    3716 <title abbrev="RFC Key Words">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
    3717 <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
    3718 <organization>Harvard University</organization>
    3719 <address>
    3720 <postal>
    3721 <street>1350 Mass. Ave.</street>
    3722 <street>Cambridge</street>
    3723 <street>MA 02138</street></postal>
    3724 <phone>- +1 617 495 3864</phone>
    3725 <email>-</email></address></author>
    3726 <date month="March" year="1997"/>
    3727 <area>General</area>
    3728 <keyword>keyword</keyword>
    3729 </front>
    3730 
    3731 <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
    3732 <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
     3715  <front>
     3716    <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
     3717    <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
     3718      <organization>Harvard University</organization>
     3719      <address><email>sob@harvard.edu</email></address>
     3720    </author>
     3721    <date month="March" year="1997"/>
     3722  </front>
     3723  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
     3724  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
    37333725</reference>
    37343726

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p2-semantics.html

    r95 r96  
    489489      <h1 class="np" id="rfc.toc"><a href="#rfc.toc">Table of Contents</a></h1>
    490490      <ul class="toc">
    491          <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li>
     491         <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a><ul class="toc">
     492               <li class="tocline1">1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></li>
     493            </ul>
     494         </li>
    492495         <li class="tocline0">2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#product.tokens">Product Tokens</a></li>
    493496         <li class="tocline0">3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#method">Method</a></li>
    … …  
    607610         entity-body content. The relationship between HTTP and MIME is described in <a href="p3-payload.html#differences.between.http.entities.and.rfc.2045.entities" title="Differences Between HTTP Entities and RFC 2045 Entities">Appendix A</a> of <a href="#Part3" id="rfc.xref.Part3.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 3: Message Payload and Content Negotiation">[Part3]</cite></a>.
    608611      </p>
     612      <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="intro.requirements" href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></h2>
     613      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
     614         in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>.
     615      </p>
     616      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.2">An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level and all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> level requirements but not all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     617      </p>
    609618      <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a>&nbsp;<a id="product.tokens" href="#product.tokens">Product Tokens</a></h1>
    610619      <p id="rfc.section.2.p.1">Product tokens are used to allow communicating applications to identify themselves by software name and version. Most fields
    … …  
    10661075      <p id="rfc.section.9.3.2.p.2">The new permanent URI <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be given by the Location field in the response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the response <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URI(s).
    10671076      </p>
    1068       <p id="rfc.section.9.3.2.p.3">If the 301 status code is received in response to a request method that is known to be "safe", as defined in <a href="#safe.methods" title="Safe Methods">Section&nbsp;8.1.1</a>, then the request MAY be automatically redirected by the user agent without confirmation. Otherwise, the user agent <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which
     1077      <p id="rfc.section.9.3.2.p.3">If the 301 status code is received in response to a request method that is known to be "safe", as defined in <a href="#safe.methods" title="Safe Methods">Section&nbsp;8.1.1</a>, then the request <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be automatically redirected by the user agent without confirmation. Otherwise, the user agent <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which
    10691078         the request was issued.
    10701079      </p>
    … …  
    10831092      <p id="rfc.section.9.3.3.p.2">The temporary URI <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be given by the Location field in the response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the response <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URI(s).
    10841093      </p>
    1085       <p id="rfc.section.9.3.3.p.3">If the 302 status code is received in response to a request method that is known to be "safe", as defined in <a href="#safe.methods" title="Safe Methods">Section&nbsp;8.1.1</a>, then the request MAY be automatically redirected by the user agent without confirmation. Otherwise, the user agent <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which
     1094      <p id="rfc.section.9.3.3.p.3">If the 302 status code is received in response to a request method that is known to be "safe", as defined in <a href="#safe.methods" title="Safe Methods">Section&nbsp;8.1.1</a>, then the request <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be automatically redirected by the user agent without confirmation. Otherwise, the user agent <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which
    10861095         the request was issued.
    10871096      </p>
    … …  
    11371146         the 307 status. Therefore, the note <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> contain the information necessary for a user to repeat the original request on the new URI.
    11381147      </p>
    1139       <p id="rfc.section.9.3.8.p.3">If the 307 status code is received in response to a request method that is known to be "safe", as defined in <a href="#safe.methods" title="Safe Methods">Section&nbsp;8.1.1</a>, then the request MAY be automatically redirected by the user agent without confirmation. Otherwise, the user agent <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which
     1148      <p id="rfc.section.9.3.8.p.3">If the 307 status code is received in response to a request method that is known to be "safe", as defined in <a href="#safe.methods" title="Safe Methods">Section&nbsp;8.1.1</a>, then the request <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be automatically redirected by the user agent without confirmation. Otherwise, the user agent <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which
    11401149         the request was issued.
    11411150      </p>
    … …  
    15351544      <h1 id="rfc.references"><a href="#rfc.section.14" id="rfc.section.14">14.</a> References
    15361545      </h1>
    1537       <table summary="References">                     
     1546      <table summary="References">                       
    15381547         <tr>
    15391548            <td class="reference"><b id="Luo1998">[Luo1998]</b></td>
    … …  
    15781587            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2068">[RFC2068]</b></td>
    15791588            <td class="top"><a title="University of California, Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science">Fielding, R.</a>, <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Digital Equipment Corporation, Western Research Laboratory">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Nielsen, H.</a>, and <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">T. Berners-Lee</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2068, January&nbsp;1997.
     1589            </td>
     1590         </tr>
     1591         <tr>
     1592            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2119">[RFC2119]</b></td>
     1593            <td class="top"><a title="Harvard University">Bradner, S.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>”, BCP&nbsp;14, RFC&nbsp;2119, March&nbsp;1997.
    15801594            </td>
    15811595         </tr>
    … …  
    18741888                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC1123</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1123.1">10.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC1123"><b>14</b></a></li>
    18751889                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2068</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#RFC2068"><b>14</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.1">A</a></li>
     1890                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2119</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2119.1">1.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2119"><b>14</b></a></li>
    18761891                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2616</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">§</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2616"><b>14</b></a></li>
    18771892                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC822</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC822.1">10.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC822"><b>14</b></a></li>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p2-semantics.xml

    r95 r96  
    267267   between HTTP and MIME is described in &diff2045entity;.
    268268</t>
     269
     270<section title="Requirements" anchor="intro.requirements">
     271<t>
     272   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
     273   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
     274   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
     275</t>
     276<t>
     277   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
     278   of the &MUST; or &REQUIRED; level requirements for the protocols it
     279   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the &MUST; or &REQUIRED;
     280   level and all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its protocols is said
     281   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the &MUST;
     282   level requirements but not all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its
     283   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     284</t>
     285</section>
    269286</section>
    270287
    … …  
    11371154   If the 301 status code is received in response to a request method
    11381155   that is known to be "safe", as defined in <xref target="safe.methods"/>,
    1139    then the request MAY be automatically redirected by the user agent without
     1156   then the request &MAY; be automatically redirected by the user agent without
    11401157   confirmation.  Otherwise, the user agent &MUST-NOT; automatically redirect the
    11411158   request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might
    … …  
    11681185   If the 302 status code is received in response to a request method
    11691186   that is known to be "safe", as defined in <xref target="safe.methods"/>,
    1170    then the request MAY be automatically redirected by the user agent without
     1187   then the request &MAY; be automatically redirected by the user agent without
    11711188   confirmation.  Otherwise, the user agent &MUST-NOT; automatically redirect the
    11721189   request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might
    … …  
    12661283   If the 307 status code is received in response to a request method
    12671284   that is known to be "safe", as defined in <xref target="safe.methods"/>,
    1268    then the request MAY be automatically redirected by the user agent without
     1285   then the request &MAY; be automatically redirected by the user agent without
    12691286   confirmation.  Otherwise, the user agent &MUST-NOT; automatically redirect the
    12701287   request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might
    … …  
    24802497</reference>
    24812498
     2499<reference anchor="RFC2119">
     2500  <front>
     2501    <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
     2502    <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
     2503      <organization>Harvard University</organization>
     2504      <address><email>sob@harvard.edu</email></address>
     2505    </author>
     2506    <date month="March" year="1997"/>
     2507  </front>
     2508  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
     2509  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
     2510</reference>
     2511
    24822512<reference anchor="Luo1998">
    24832513<front>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p3-payload.html

    r95 r96  
    485485      <h1 class="np" id="rfc.toc"><a href="#rfc.toc">Table of Contents</a></h1>
    486486      <ul class="toc">
    487          <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li>
     487         <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a><ul class="toc">
     488               <li class="tocline1">1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></li>
     489            </ul>
     490         </li>
    488491         <li class="tocline0">2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#protocol.parameters">Protocol Parameters</a><ul class="toc">
    489492               <li class="tocline1">2.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#character.sets">Character Sets</a><ul class="toc">
    … …  
    559562         edit.
    560563      </p>
     564      <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="intro.requirements" href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></h2>
     565      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
     566         in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>.
     567      </p>
     568      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.2">An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level and all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> level requirements but not all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     569      </p>
    561570      <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a>&nbsp;<a id="protocol.parameters" href="#protocol.parameters">Protocol Parameters</a></h1>
    562571      <h2 id="rfc.section.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.1">2.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="character.sets" href="#character.sets">Character Sets</a></h2>
    … …  
    954963      </p>
    955964      <div id="rfc.figure.u.20"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.22"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.23"></span>    Accept-Encoding  = "Accept-Encoding" ":"
    956                        1#( codings [ ";" "q" "=" qvalue ] )
    957     codings          = ( content-coding | "*" )
    958 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.3">Examples of its use are:</p>
    959       <div id="rfc.figure.u.21"></div><pre class="text">    Accept-Encoding: compress, gzip
    960     Accept-Encoding:
    961     Accept-Encoding: *
    962     Accept-Encoding: compress;q=0.5, gzip;q=1.0
    963     Accept-Encoding: gzip;q=1.0, identity; q=0.5, *;q=0
    964 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.5">A server tests whether a content-coding is acceptable, according to an Accept-Encoding field, using these rules: </p>
    965       <ol>
    966          <li>If the content-coding is one of the content-codings listed in the Accept-Encoding field, then it is acceptable, unless it
    967             is accompanied by a qvalue of 0. (As defined in <a href="#quality.values" title="Quality Values">Section&nbsp;2.4</a>, a qvalue of 0 means "not acceptable.")
    968          </li>
    969          <li>The special "*" symbol in an Accept-Encoding field matches any available content-coding not explicitly listed in the header
    970             field.
    971          </li>
    972          <li>If multiple content-codings are acceptable, then the acceptable content-coding with the highest non-zero qvalue is preferred.</li>
    973          <li>The "identity" content-coding is always acceptable, unless specifically refused because the Accept-Encoding field includes
    974             "identity;q=0", or because the field includes "*;q=0" and does not explicitly include the "identity" content-coding. If the
    975             Accept-Encoding field-value is empty, then only the "identity" encoding is acceptable.
    976          </li>
    977       </ol>
    978       <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.6">If an Accept-Encoding field is present in a request, and if the server cannot send a response which is acceptable according
    979          to the Accept-Encoding header, then the server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send an error response with the 406 (Not Acceptable) status code.
    980       </p>
    981       <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.7">If no Accept-Encoding field is present in a request, the server <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> assume that the client will accept any content coding. In this case, if "identity" is one of the available content-codings,
    982          then the server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> use the "identity" content-coding, unless it has additional information that a different content-coding is meaningful to the
    983          client.
    984       </p>
    985       <dl class="empty">
    986          <dd> <b>Note:</b> If the request does not include an Accept-Encoding field, and if the "identity" content-coding is unavailable, then content-codings
    987             commonly understood by HTTP/1.0 clients (i.e., "gzip" and "compress") are preferred; some older clients improperly display
    988             messages sent with other content-codings. The server might also make this decision based on information about the particular
    989             user-agent or client.
    990          </dd>
    991          <dd> <b>Note:</b> Most HTTP/1.0 applications do not recognize or obey qvalues associated with content-codings. This means that qvalues will
    992             not work and are not permitted with x-gzip or x-compress.
    993          </dd>
    994       </dl>
    995       <div id="rfc.iref.a.4"></div>
    996       <div id="rfc.iref.h.4"></div>
    997       <h2 id="rfc.section.5.4"><a href="#rfc.section.5.4">5.4</a>&nbsp;<a id="header.accept-language" href="#header.accept-language">Accept-Language</a></h2>
    998       <p id="rfc.section.5.4.p.1">The Accept-Language request-header field is similar to Accept, but restricts the set of natural languages that are preferred
    999          as a response to the request. Language tags are defined in <a href="#language.tags" title="Language Tags">Section&nbsp;2.5</a>.
    1000       </p>
    1001       <div id="rfc.figure.u.22"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.24"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.25"></span>    Accept-Language = "Accept-Language" ":"
    1002                       1#( language-range [ ";" "q" "=" qvalue ] )
    1003     language-range  = ( ( 1*8ALPHA *( "-" 1*8ALPHA ) ) | "*" )
    1004 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.4.p.3">Each language-range <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be given an associated quality value which represents an estimate of the user's preference for the languages specified by
    1005          that range. The quality value defaults to "q=1". For example,
    1006       </p>
    1007       <div id="rfc.figure.u.23"></div><pre class="text">    Accept-Language: da, en-gb;q=0.8, en;q=0.7
    1008 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.4.p.5">would mean: "I prefer Danish, but will accept British English and other types of English." A language-range matches a language-tag
    1009          if it exactly equals the tag, or if it exactly equals a prefix of the tag such that the first tag character following the
    1010          prefix is "-". The special range "*", if present in the Accept-Language field, matches every tag not matched by any other
    1011          range present in the Accept-Language field.
    1012       </p>
    1013       <dl class="empty">
    1014          <dd> <b>Note:</b> This use of a prefix matching rule does not imply that language tags are assigned to languages in such a way that it is always
    1015             true that if a user understands a language with a certain tag, then this user will also understand all languages with tags
    1016             for which this tag is a prefix. The prefix rule simply allows the use of prefix tags if this is the case.
    1017          </dd>
    1018       </dl>
    1019       <p id="rfc.section.5.4.p.6">The language quality factor assigned to a language-tag by the Accept-Language field is the quality value of the longest language-range
    1020          in the field that matches the language-tag. If no language-range in the field matches the tag, the language quality factor
    1021          assigned is 0. If no Accept-Language header is present in the request, the server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> assume that all languages are equally acceptable. If an Accept-Language header is present, then all languages which are assigned
    1022          a quality factor greater than 0 are acceptable.
    1023       </p>
    1024       <p id="rfc.section.5.4.p.7">It might be contrary to the privacy expectations of the user to send an Accept-Language header with the complete linguistic
    1025          preferences of the user in every request. For a discussion of this issue, see <a href="#privacy.issues.connected.to.accept.headers" title="Privacy Issues Connected to Accept Headers">Section&nbsp;7.1</a>.
    1026       </p>
    1027       <p id="rfc.section.5.4.p.8">As intelligibility is highly dependent on the individual user, it is recommended that client applications make the choice
    1028          of linguistic preference available to the user. If the choice is not made available, then the Accept-Language header field <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be given in the request.
    1029       </p>
    1030       <dl class="empty">
    1031          <dd> <b>Note:</b> When making the choice of linguistic preference available to the user, we remind implementors of the fact that users are not
    1032             familiar with the details of language matching as described above, and should provide appropriate guidance. As an example,
    1033             users might assume that on selecting "en-gb", they will be served any kind of English document if British English is not available.
    1034             A user agent might suggest in such a case to add "en" to get the best matching behavior.
    1035          </dd>
    1036       </dl>
    1037       <div id="rfc.iref.c.2"></div>
    1038       <div id="rfc.iref.h.5"></div>
    1039       <h2 id="rfc.section.5.5"><a href="#rfc.section.5.5">5.5</a>&nbsp;<a id="header.content-encoding" href="#header.content-encoding">Content-Encoding</a></h2>
    1040       <p id="rfc.section.5.5.p.1">The Content-Encoding entity-header field is used as a modifier to the media-type. When present, its value indicates what additional
    1041          content codings have been applied to the entity-body, and thus what decoding mechanisms must be applied in order to obtain
    1042          the media-type referenced by the Content-Type header field. Content-Encoding is primarily used to allow a document to be compressed
    1043          without losing the identity of its underlying media type.
    1044       </p>
    1045       <div id="rfc.figure.u.24"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.26"></span>    Content-Encoding  = "Content-Encoding" ":" 1#content-coding
    1046 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.5.p.3">Content codings are defined in <a href="#content.codings" title="Content Codings">Section&nbsp;2.2</a>. An example of its use is
    1047       </p>
    1048       <div id="rfc.figure.u.25"></div><pre class="text">    Content-Encoding: gzip
    1049 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.5.p.5">The content-coding is a characteristic of the entity identified by the Request-URI. Typically, the entity-body is stored with
    1050          this encoding and is only decoded before rendering or analogous usage. However, a non-transparent proxy <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> modify the content-coding if the new coding is known to be acceptable to the recipient, unless the "no-transform" cache-control
    1051          directive is present in the message.
    1052       </p>
    1053       <p id="rfc.section.5.5.p.6">If the content-coding of an entity is not "identity", then the response <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> include a Content-Encoding entity-header (<a href="#header.content-encoding" id="rfc.xref.header.content-encoding.3" title="Content-Encoding">Section&nbsp;5.5</a>) that lists the non-identity content-coding(s) used.
    1054       </p>
    1055       <p id="rfc.section.5.5.p.7">If the content-coding of an entity in a request message is not acceptable to the origin server, the server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> respond with a status code of 415 (Unsupported Media Type).
    1056       </p>
    1057       <p id="rfc.section.5.5.p.8">If multiple encodings have been applied to an entity, the content codings <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be listed in the order in which they were applied. Additional information about the encoding parameters <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be provided by other entity-header fields not defined by this specification.
    1058       </p>
    1059       <div id="rfc.iref.c.3"></div>
    1060       <div id="rfc.iref.h.6"></div>
    1061       <h2 id="rfc.section.5.6"><a href="#rfc.section.5.6">5.6</a>&nbsp;<a id="header.content-language" href="#header.content-language">Content-Language</a></h2>
    1062       <p id="rfc.section.5.6.p.1">The Content-Language entity-header field describes the natural language(s) of the intended audience for the enclosed entity.
    1063          Note that this might not be equivalent to all the languages used within the entity-body.
    1064       </p>
    1065       <div id="rfc.figure.u.26"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.27"></span>    Content-Language  = "Content-Language" ":" 1#language-tag
    1066 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.6.p.3">Language tags are defined in <a href="#language.tags" title="Language Tags">Section&nbsp;2.5</a>. The primary purpose of Content-Language is to allow a user to identify and differentiate entities according to the user's
    1067          own preferred language. Thus, if the body content is intended only for a Danish-literate audience, the appropriate field is
    1068       </p>
    1069       <div id="rfc.figure.u.27"></div><pre class="text">    Content-Language: da
    1070 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.6.p.5">If no Content-Language is specified, the default is that the content is intended for all language audiences. This might mean
    1071          that the sender does not consider it to be specific to any natural language, or that the sender does not know for which language
    1072          it is intended.
    1073       </p>
    1074       <p id="rfc.section.5.6.p.6">Multiple languages <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be listed for content that is intended for multiple audiences. For example, a rendition of the "Treaty of Waitangi," presented
    1075          simultaneously in the original Maori and English versions, would call for
    1076       </p>
    1077       <div id="rfc.figure.u.28"></div><pre class="text">    Content-Language: mi, en
    1078 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.6.p.8">However, just because multiple languages are present within an entity does not mean that it is intended for multiple linguistic
    1079          audiences. An example would be a beginner's language primer, such as "A First Lesson in Latin," which is clearly intended
    1080          to be used by an English-literate audience. In this case, the Content-Language would properly only include "en".
    1081       </p>
    1082       <p id="rfc.section.5.6.p.9">Content-Language <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be applied to any media type -- it is not limited to textual documents.
    1083       </p>
    1084       <div id="rfc.iref.c.4"></div>
    1085       <div id="rfc.iref.h.7"></div>
    1086       <h2 id="rfc.section.5.7"><a href="#rfc.section.5.7">5.7</a>&nbsp;<a id="header.content-location" href="#header.content-location">Content-Location</a></h2>
    1087       <p id="rfc.section.5.7.p.1">The Content-Location entity-header field <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be used to supply the resource location for the entity enclosed in the message when that entity is accessible from a location
    1088          separate from the requested resource's URI. A server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> provide a Content-Location for the variant corresponding to the response entity; especially in the case where a resource has
    1089          multiple entities associated with it, and those entities actually have separate locations by which they might be individually
    1090          accessed, the server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> provide a Content-Location for the particular variant which is returned.
    1091       </p>
    1092       <div id="rfc.figure.u.29"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.28"></span>    Content-Location = "Content-Location" ":"
    1093                       ( absoluteURI | relativeURI )
    1094 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.7.p.3">The value of Content-Location also defines the base URI for the entity.</p>
    1095       <p id="rfc.section.5.7.p.4">The Content-Location value is not a replacement for the original requested URI; it is only a statement of the location of
    1096          the resource corresponding to this particular entity at the time of the request. Future requests <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> specify the Content-Location URI as the request-URI if the desire is to identify the source of that particular entity.
    1097       </p>
    1098       <p id="rfc.section.5.7.p.5">A cache cannot assume that an entity with a Content-Location different from the URI used to retrieve it can be used to respond
    1099          to later requests on that Content-Location URI. However, the Content-Location can be used to differentiate between multiple
    1100          entities retrieved from a single requested resource, as described in <a href="#Part6" id="rfc.xref.Part6.3"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching">[Part6]</cite></a>.
    1101       </p>
    1102       <p id="rfc.section.5.7.p.6">If the Content-Location is a relative URI, the relative URI is interpreted relative to the Request-URI.</p>
    1103       <p id="rfc.section.5.7.p.7">The meaning of the Content-Location header in PUT or POST requests is undefined; servers are free to ignore it in those cases.</p>
    1104       <div id="rfc.iref.c.5"></div>
    1105       <div id="rfc.iref.h.8"></div>
    1106       <h2 id="rfc.section.5.8"><a href="#rfc.section.5.8">5.8</a>&nbsp;<a id="header.content-md5" href="#header.content-md5">Content-MD5</a></h2>
    1107       <p id="rfc.section.5.8.p.1">The Content-MD5 entity-header field, as defined in RFC 1864 <a href="#RFC1864" id="rfc.xref.RFC1864.1"><cite title="The Content-MD5 Header Field">[RFC1864]</cite></a>, is an MD5 digest of the entity-body for the purpose of providing an end-to-end message integrity check (MIC) of the entity-body.
    1108          (Note: a MIC is good for detecting accidental modification of the entity-body in transit, but is not proof against malicious
    1109          attacks.)
    1110       </p>
    1111       <div id="rfc.figure.u.30"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.29"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.30"></span>     Content-MD5   = "Content-MD5" ":" md5-digest
    1112      md5-digest   = &lt;base64 of 128 bit MD5 digest as per RFC 1864&gt;
    1113 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.8.p.3">The Content-MD5 header field <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be generated by an origin server or client to function as an integrity check of the entity-body. Only origin servers or clients <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> generate the Content-MD5 header field; proxies and gateways <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> generate it, as this would defeat its value as an end-to-end integrity check. Any recipient of the entity-body, including
    1114          gateways and proxies, <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> check that the digest value in this header field matches that of the entity-body as received.
    1115       </p>
    1116       <p id="rfc.section.5.8.p.4">The MD5 digest is computed based on the content of the entity-body, including any content-coding that has been applied, but
    1117          not including any transfer-encoding applied to the message-body. If the message is received with a transfer-encoding, that
    1118          encoding <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be removed prior to checking the Content-MD5 value against the received entity.
    1119       </p>
    1120       <p id="rfc.section.5.8.p.5">This has the result that the digest is computed on the octets of the entity-body exactly as, and in the order that, they would
    1121          be sent if no transfer-encoding were being applied.
    1122       </p>
    1123       <p id="rfc.section.5.8.p.6">HTTP extends RFC 1864 to permit the digest to be computed for MIME composite media-types (e.g., multipart/* and message/rfc822),
    1124          but this does not change how the digest is computed as defined in the preceding paragraph.
    1125       </p>
    1126       <p id="rfc.section.5.8.p.7">There are several consequences of this. The entity-body for composite types <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> contain many body-parts, each with its own MIME and HTTP headers (including Content-MD5, Content-Transfer-Encoding, and Content-Encoding
    1127          headers). If a body-part has a Content-Transfer-Encoding or Content-Encoding header, it is assumed that the content of the
    1128          body-part has had the encoding applied, and the body-part is included in the Content-MD5 digest as is -- i.e., after the application.
    1129          The Transfer-Encoding header field is not allowed within body-parts.
    1130       </p>
    1131       <p id="rfc.section.5.8.p.8">Conversion of all line breaks to CRLF <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be done before computing or checking the digest: the line break convention used in the text actually transmitted <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be left unaltered when computing the digest.
    1132       </p>
    1133       <dl class="empty">
    1134          <dd> <b>Note:</b> while the definition of Content-MD5 is exactly the same for HTTP as in RFC 1864 for MIME entity-bodies, there are several
    1135             ways in which the application of Content-MD5 to HTTP entity-bodies differs from its application to MIME entity-bodies. One
    1136             is that HTTP, unlike MIME, does not use Content-Transfer-Encoding, and does use Transfer-Encoding and Content-Encoding. Another
    1137             is that HTTP more frequently uses binary content types than MIME, so it is worth noting that, in such cases, the byte order
    1138             used to compute the digest is the transmission byte order defined for the type. Lastly, HTTP allows transmission of text types
    1139             with any of several line break conventions and not just the canonical form using CRLF.
    1140          </dd>
    1141       </dl>
    1142       <div id="rfc.iref.c.6"></div>
    1143       <div id="rfc.iref.h.9"></div>
    1144       <h2 id="rfc.section.5.9"><a href="#rfc.section.5.9">5.9</a>&nbsp;<a id="header.content-type" href="#header.content-type">Content-Type</a></h2>
    1145       <p id="rfc.section.5.9.p.1">The Content-Type entity-header field indicates the media type of the entity-body sent to the recipient or, in the case of
    1146          the HEAD method, the media type that would have been sent had the request been a GET.
    1147       </p>
    1148       <div id="rfc.figure.u.31"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.31"></span>    Content-Type   = "Content-Type" ":" media-type
    1149 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.9.p.3">Media types are defined in <a href="#media.types" title="Media Types">Section&nbsp;2.3</a>. An example of the field is
    1150       </p>
    1151       <div id="rfc.figure.u.32"></div><pre class="text">    Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-4
    1152 </pre><p id="rfc.section.5.9.p.5">Further discussion of methods for identifying the media type of an entity is provided in <a href="#type" title="Type">Section&nbsp;3.2.1</a>.
    1153       </p>
    1154       <h1 id="rfc.section.6"><a href="#rfc.section.6">6.</a>&nbsp;<a id="IANA.considerations" href="#IANA.considerations">IANA Considerations</a></h1>
    1155       <p id="rfc.section.6.p.1">TBD.</p>
    1156       <h1 id="rfc.section.7"><a href="#rfc.section.7">7.</a>&nbsp;<a id="security.considerations" href="#security.considerations">Security Considerations</a></h1>
    1157       <p id="rfc.section.7.p.1">This section is meant to inform application developers, information providers, and users of the security limitations in HTTP/1.1
    1158          as described by this document. The discussion does not include definitive solutions to the problems revealed, though it does
    1159          make some suggestions for reducing security risks.
    1160       </p>
    1161       <h2 id="rfc.section.7.1"><a href="#rfc.section.7.1">7.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="privacy.issues.connected.to.accept.headers" href="#privacy.issues.connected.to.accept.headers">Privacy Issues Connected to Accept Headers</a></h2>
    1162       <p id="rfc.section.7.1.p.1">Accept request-headers can reveal information about the user to all servers which are accessed. The Accept-Language header
    1163          in particular can reveal information the user would consider to be of a private nature, because the understanding of particular
    1164          languages is often strongly correlated to the membership of a particular ethnic group. User agents which offer the option
    1165          to configure the contents of an Accept-Language header to be sent in every request are strongly encouraged to let the configuration
    1166          process include a message which makes the user aware of the loss of privacy involved.
    1167       </p>
    1168       <p id="rfc.section.7.1.p.2">An approach that limits the loss of privacy would be for a user agent to omit the sending of Accept-Language headers by default,
    1169          and to ask the user whether or not to start sending Accept-Language headers to a server if it detects, by looking for any
    1170          Vary response-header fields generated by the server, that such sending could improve the quality of service.
    1171       </p>
    1172       <p id="rfc.section.7.1.p.3">Elaborate user-customized accept header fields sent in every request, in particular if these include quality values, can be
    1173          used by servers as relatively reliable and long-lived user identifiers. Such user identifiers would allow content providers
    1174          to do click-trail tracking, and would allow collaborating content providers to match cross-server click-trails or form submissions
    1175          of individual users. Note that for many users not behind a proxy, the network address of the host running the user agent will
    1176          also serve as a long-lived user identifier. In environments where proxies are used to enhance privacy, user agents ought to
    1177          be conservative in offering accept header configuration options to end users. As an extreme privacy measure, proxies could
    1178          filter the accept headers in relayed requests. General purpose user agents which provide a high degree of header configurability <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> warn users about the loss of privacy which can be involved.
    1179       </p>
    1180       <h2 id="rfc.section.7.2"><a href="#rfc.section.7.2">7.2</a>&nbsp;<a id="content-disposition.issues" href="#content-disposition.issues">Content-Disposition Issues</a></h2>
    1181       <p id="rfc.section.7.2.p.1">RFC 1806 <a href="#RFC1806" id="rfc.xref.RFC1806.1"><cite title="Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition Header">[RFC1806]</cite></a>, from which the often implemented Content-Disposition (see <a href="#content-disposition" id="rfc.xref.content-disposition.1" title="Content-Disposition">Appendix&nbsp;B.1</a>) header in HTTP is derived, has a number of very serious security considerations. Content-Disposition is not part of the
    1182          HTTP standard, but since it is widely implemented, we are documenting its use and risks for implementors. See RFC 2183 <a href="#RFC2183" id="rfc.xref.RFC2183.1"><cite title="Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition Header Field">[RFC2183]</cite></a> (which updates RFC 1806) for details.
    1183       </p>
    1184       <h1 id="rfc.section.8"><a href="#rfc.section.8">8.</a>&nbsp;<a id="ack" href="#ack">Acknowledgments</a></h1>
    1185       <h1 id="rfc.references"><a href="#rfc.section.9" id="rfc.section.9">9.</a> References
    1186       </h1>
    1187       <table summary="References">                                               
    1188          <tr>
    1189             <td class="reference"><b id="Part1">[Part1]</b></td>
    1190             <td class="top"><a title="Day Software">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a title="One Laptop per Child">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Hewlett-Packard Company">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a title="Adobe Systems, Incorporated">Masinter, L.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Berners-Lee, T.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a title="greenbytes GmbH">J. F. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest">HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest (work in progress), December&nbsp;2007.
    1191             </td>
    1192          </tr>
    1193          <tr>
    1194             <td class="reference"><b id="Part2">[Part2]</b></td>
    1195             <td class="top"><a title="Day Software">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a title="One Laptop per Child">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Hewlett-Packard Company">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a title="Adobe Systems, Incorporated">Masinter, L.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Berners-Lee, T.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a title="greenbytes GmbH">J. F. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest">HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest (work in progress), December&nbsp;2007.
    1196             </td>
    1197          </tr>
    1198          <tr>
    1199             <td class="reference"><b id="Part4">[Part4]</b></td>
    1200             <td class="top"><a title="Day Software">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a title="One Laptop per Child">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Hewlett-Packard Company">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a title="Adobe Systems, Incorporated">Masinter, L.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Berners-Lee, T.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a title="greenbytes GmbH">J. F. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-latest">HTTP/1.1, part 4: Conditional Requests</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-latest (work in progress), December&nbsp;2007.
    1201             </td>
    1202          </tr>
    1203          <tr>
    1204             <td class="reference"><b id="Part5">[Part5]</b></td>
    1205             <td class="top"><a title="Day Software">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a title="One Laptop per Child">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Hewlett-Packard Company">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a title="Adobe Systems, Incorporated">Masinter, L.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Berners-Lee, T.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a title="greenbytes GmbH">J. F. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest">HTTP/1.1, part 5: Range Requests and Partial Responses</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest (work in progress), December&nbsp;2007.
    1206             </td>
    1207          </tr>
    1208          <tr>
    1209             <td class="reference"><b id="Part6">[Part6]</b></td>
    1210             <td class="top"><a title="Day Software">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a title="One Laptop per Child">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Hewlett-Packard Company">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a title="Adobe Systems, Incorporated">Masinter, L.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Berners-Lee, T.</a>, <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a title="greenbytes GmbH">J. F. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest">HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest (work in progress), December&nbsp;2007.
    1211             </td>
    1212          </tr>
    1213          <tr>
    1214             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC1766">[RFC1766]</b></td>
    1215             <td class="top"><a title="UNINETT">Alvestrand, H.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1766">Tags for the Identification of Languages</a>”, RFC&nbsp;1766, March&nbsp;1995.
    1216             </td>
    1217          </tr>
    1218          <tr>
    1219             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC1806">[RFC1806]</b></td>
    1220             <td class="top"><a title="New Century Systems">Troost, R.</a> and <a title="QUALCOMM Incorporated">S. Dorner</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1806">Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition Header</a>”, RFC&nbsp;1806, June&nbsp;1995.
    1221             </td>
    1222          </tr>
    1223          <tr>
    1224             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC1864">[RFC1864]</b></td>
    1225             <td class="top"><a title="Carnegie Mellon University">Myers, J.</a> and <a title="Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.">M. Rose</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1864">The Content-MD5 Header Field</a>”, RFC&nbsp;1864, October&nbsp;1995.
    1226             </td>
    1227          </tr>
    1228          <tr>
    1229             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC1867">[RFC1867]</b></td>
    1230             <td class="top"><a title="Xerox Palo Alto Research Center">Masinter, L.</a> and <a title="XSoft, Xerox Corporation">E. Nebel</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1867">Form-based File Upload in HTML</a>”, RFC&nbsp;1867, November&nbsp;1995.
    1231             </td>
    1232          </tr>
    1233          <tr>
    1234             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC1950">[RFC1950]</b></td>
    1235             <td class="top"><a title="Aladdin Enterprises">Deutsch, L.P.</a> and J-L. Gailly, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1950">ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3</a>”, RFC&nbsp;1950, May&nbsp;1996.
    1236             </td>
    1237          </tr>
    1238          <tr>
    1239             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC1951">[RFC1951]</b></td>
    1240             <td class="top"><a title="Aladdin Enterprises">Deutsch, P.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1951">DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3</a>”, RFC&nbsp;1951, May&nbsp;1996.
    1241             </td>
    1242          </tr>
    1243          <tr>
    1244             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC1952">[RFC1952]</b></td>
    1245             <td class="top"><a title="Aladdin Enterprises">Deutsch, P.</a>, <a>Gailly, J-L.</a>, <a>Adler, M.</a>, <a>Deutsch, L.P.</a>, and <a>G. Randers-Pehrson</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1952">GZIP file format specification version 4.3</a>”, RFC&nbsp;1952, May&nbsp;1996.
    1246             </td>
    1247          </tr>
    1248          <tr>
    1249             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2045">[RFC2045]</b></td>
    1250             <td class="top"><a title="Innosoft International, Inc.">Freed, N.</a> and <a title="First Virtual Holdings">N.S. Borenstein</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2045">Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2045, November&nbsp;1996.
    1251             </td>
    1252          </tr>
    1253          <tr>
    1254             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2046">[RFC2046]</b></td>
    1255             <td class="top"><a title="Innosoft International, Inc.">Freed, N.</a> and <a title="First Virtual Holdings">N. Borenstein</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2046">Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2046, November&nbsp;1996.
    1256             </td>
    1257          </tr>
    1258          <tr>
    1259             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2049">[RFC2049]</b></td>
    1260             <td class="top"><a title="Innosoft International, Inc.">Freed, N.</a> and <a title="First Virtual Holdings">N.S. Borenstein</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2049">Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Five: Conformance Criteria and Examples</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2049, November&nbsp;1996.
    1261             </td>
    1262          </tr>
    1263          <tr>
    1264             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2068">[RFC2068]</b></td>
    1265             <td class="top"><a title="University of California, Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science">Fielding, R.</a>, <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Digital Equipment Corporation, Western Research Laboratory">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Nielsen, H.</a>, and <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">T. Berners-Lee</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2068, January&nbsp;1997.
    1266             </td>
    1267          </tr>
    1268          <tr>
    1269             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2076">[RFC2076]</b></td>
    1270             <td class="top"><a title="Stockholm University/KTH">Palme, J.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2076">Common Internet Message Headers</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2076, February&nbsp;1997.
    1271             </td>
    1272          </tr>
    1273          <tr>
    1274             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2110">[RFC2110]</b></td>
    1275             <td class="top"><a title="Stockholm University and KTH">Palme, J.</a> and <a title="Microsoft Corporation">A. Hopmann</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2110">MIME E-mail Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents, such as HTML (MHTML)</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2110, March&nbsp;1997.
    1276             </td>
    1277          </tr>
    1278          <tr>
    1279             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2183">[RFC2183]</b></td>
    1280             <td class="top"><a title="New Century Systems">Troost, R.</a>, <a title="QUALCOMM Incorporated">Dorner, S.</a>, and <a title="Department of Computer Science">K. Moore</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2183">Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition Header Field</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2183, August&nbsp;1997.
    1281             </td>
    1282          </tr>
    1283          <tr>
    1284             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2277">[RFC2277]</b></td>
    1285             <td class="top"><a title="UNINETT">Alvestrand, H.T.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2277">IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages</a>”, BCP&nbsp;18, RFC&nbsp;2277, January&nbsp;1998.
    1286             </td>
    1287          </tr>
    1288          <tr>
    1289             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2279">[RFC2279]</b></td>
    1290             <td class="top"><a title="Alis Technologies">Yergeau, F.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2279">UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2279, January&nbsp;1998.
    1291             </td>
    1292          </tr>
    1293          <tr>
    1294             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2616">[RFC2616]</b></td>
    1295             <td class="top"><a title="University of California, Irvine">Fielding, R.</a>, <a title="W3C">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Compaq Computer Corporation">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a title="Xerox Corporation">Masinter, L.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, and <a title="W3C">T. Berners-Lee</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2616, June&nbsp;1999.
    1296             </td>
    1297          </tr>
    1298          <tr>
    1299             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC4288">[RFC4288]</b></td>
    1300             <td class="top"><a title="Sun Microsystems">Freed, N.</a> and <a>J. Klensin</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4288">Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures</a>”, BCP&nbsp;13, RFC&nbsp;4288, December&nbsp;2005.
    1301             </td>
    1302          </tr>
    1303          <tr>
    1304             <td class="reference"><b id="RFC822">[RFC822]</b></td>
    1305             <td class="top"><a title="University of Delaware, Dept. of Electrical Engineering">Crocker, D.H.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc822">Standard for the format of ARPA Internet text messages</a>”, STD&nbsp;11, RFC&nbsp;822, August&nbsp;1982.
    1306             </td>
    1307          </tr>
    1308       </table>
    1309       <h1 id="rfc.authors"><a href="#rfc.authors">Authors' Addresses</a></h1>
    1310       <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Roy T. Fielding</span>
    1311             (editor)
    1312             <span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Fielding</span><span class="given-name">Roy T.</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">Day Software</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">23 Corporate Plaza DR, Suite 280</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Newport Beach</span>, <span class="region">CA</span>&nbsp;<span class="postal-code">92660</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">USA</span></span><span class="vcardline tel">Phone: <a href="tel:+1-949-706-5300"><span class="value">+1-949-706-5300</span></a></span><span class="vcardline tel"><span class="type">Fax</span>: <a href="fax:+1-949-706-5305"><span class="value">+1-949-706-5305</span></a></span><span class="vcardline">EMail: <a><span class="email">fielding@gbiv.com</span></a></span><span class="vcardline">URI: <a href="http://roy.gbiv.com/" class="url">http://roy.gbiv.com/</a></span></address>
    1313       <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Jim Gettys</span><span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Gettys</span><span class="given-name">Jim</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">One Laptop per Child</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">21 Oak Knoll Road</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Carlisle</span>, <span class="region">MA</span>&nbsp;<span class="postal-code">01741</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">USA</span></span><span class="vcardline">EMail: <a><span class="email">jg@laptop.org</span></a></span><span class="vcardline">URI: <a href="http://www.laptop.org/" class="url">http://www.laptop.org/</a></span></address>
    1314       <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Jeffrey C. Mogul</span><span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Mogul</span><span class="given-name">Jeffrey C.</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">Hewlett-Packard Company</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">HP Labs, Large Scale Systems Group</span><span class="street-address vcardline">1501 Page Mill Road, MS 1177</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Palo Alto</span>, <span class="region">CA</span>&nbsp;<span class="postal-code">94304</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">USA</span></span><span class="vcardline">EMail: <a><span class="email">JeffMogul@acm.org</span></a></span></address>
    1315       <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Henrik Frystyk Nielsen</span><span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Frystyk</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">Microsoft Corporation</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">1 Microsoft Way</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Redmond</span>, <span class="region">WA</span>&nbsp;<span class="postal-code">98052</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">USA</span></span><span class="vcardline">EMail: <a><span class="email">henrikn@microsoft.com</span></a></span></address>
    1316       <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Larry Masinter</span><span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Masinter</span><span class="given-name">Larry</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">Adobe Systems, Incorporated</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">345 Park Ave</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">San Jose</span>, <span class="region">CA</span>&nbsp;<span class="postal-code">95110</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">USA</span></span><span class="vcardline">EMail: <a><span class="email">LMM@acm.org</span></a></span><span class="vcardline">URI: <a href="http://larry.masinter.net/" class="url">http://larry.masinter.net/</a></span></address>
    1317       <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Paul J. Leach</span><span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Leach</span><span class="given-name">Paul J.</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">Microsoft Corporation</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">1 Microsoft Way</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Redmond</span>, <span class="region">WA</span>&nbsp;<span class="postal-code">98052</span></span></span><span class="vcardline">EMail: <a><span class="email">paulle@microsoft.com</span></a></span></address>
    1318       <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Tim Berners-Lee</span><span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Berners-Lee</span><span class="given-name">Tim</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">World Wide Web Consortium</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory</span><span class="street-address vcardline">The Stata Center, Building 32</span><span class="street-address vcardline">32 Vassar Street</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Cambridge</span>, <span class="region">MA</span>&nbsp;<span class="postal-code">02139</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">USA</span></span><span class="vcardline">EMail: <a><span class="email">timbl@w3.org</span></a></span><span class="vcardline">URI: <a href="http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/" class="url">http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/</a></span></address>
    1319       <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Yves Lafon</span>
    1320             (editor)
    1321             <span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Lafon</span><span class="given-name">Yves</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">World Wide Web Consortium</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">W3C / ERCIM</span><span class="street-address vcardline">2004, rte des Lucioles</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Sophia-Antipolis</span>, <span class="region">AM</span>&nbsp;<span class="postal-code">06902</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">France</span></span><span class="vcardline">EMail: <a><span class="email">ylafon@w3.org</span></a></span><span class="vcardline">URI: <a href="http://www.raubacapeu.net/people/yves/" class="url">http://www.raubacapeu.net/people/yves/</a></span></address>
    1322       <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Julian F. Reschke</span>
    1323             (editor)
    1324             <span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Reschke</span><span class="given-name">Julian F.</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">greenbytes GmbH</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">Hafenweg 16</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Muenster</span>, <span class="region">NW</span>&nbsp;<span class="postal-code">48155</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">Germany</span></span><span class="vcardline tel">Phone: <a href="tel:+492512807760"><span class="value">+49 251 2807760</span></a></span><span class="vcardline tel"><span class="type">Fax</span>: <a href="fax:+492512807761"><span class="value">+49 251 2807761</span></a></span><span class="vcardline">EMail: <a><span class="email">julian.reschke@greenbytes.de</span></a></span><span class="vcardline">URI: <a href="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/" class="url">http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/</a></span></address>
    1325       <h1 id="rfc.section.A"><a href="#rfc.section.A">A.</a>&nbsp;<a id="differences.between.http.entities.and.rfc.2045.entities" href="#differences.between.http.entities.and.rfc.2045.entities">Differences Between HTTP Entities and RFC 2045 Entities</a></h1>
    1326       <p id="rfc.section.A.p.1">HTTP/1.1 uses many of the constructs defined for Internet Mail (RFC 822 <a href="#RFC822" id="rfc.xref.RFC822.1"><cite title="Standard for the format of ARPA Internet text messages">[RFC822]</cite></a>) and the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME <a href="#RFC2045" id="rfc.xref.RFC2045.1"><cite title="Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies">[RFC2045]</cite></a>) to allow entities to be transmitted in an open variety of representations and with extensible mechanisms. However, RFC 2045
    1327          discusses mail, and HTTP has a few features that are different from those described in RFC 2045. These differences were carefully
    1328          chosen to optimize performance over binary connections, to allow greater freedom in the use of new media types, to make date
    1329          comparisons easier, and to acknowledge the practice of some early HTTP servers and clients.
    1330       </p>
    1331       <p id="rfc.section.A.p.2">This appendix describes specific areas where HTTP differs from RFC 2045. Proxies and gateways to strict MIME environments <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be aware of these differences and provide the appropriate conversions where necessary. Proxies and gateways from MIME environments
    1332          to HTTP also need to be aware of the differences because some conversions might be required.
    1333       </p>
    1334       <h2 id="rfc.section.A.1"><a href="#rfc.section.A.1">A.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="mime-version" href="#mime-version">MIME-Version</a></h2>
    1335       <p id="rfc.section.A.1.p.1">HTTP is not a MIME-compliant protocol. However, HTTP/1.1 messages <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> include a single MIME-Version general-header field to indicate what version of the MIME protocol was used to construct the
    1336          message. Use of the MIME-Version header field indicates that the message is in full compliance with the MIME protocol (as
    1337          defined in RFC 2045<a href="#RFC2045" id="rfc.xref.RFC2045.2"><cite title="Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies">[RFC2045]</cite></a>). Proxies/gateways are responsible for ensuring full compliance (where possible) when exporting HTTP messages to strict MIME
    1338          environments.
    1339       </p>
    1340       <div id="rfc.figure.u.33"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.32"></span>    MIME-Version   = "MIME-Version" ":" 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT
    1341 </pre><p id="rfc.section.A.1.p.3">MIME version "1.0" is the default for use in HTTP/1.1. However, HTTP/1.1 message parsing and semantics are defined by this
    1342          document and not the MIME specification.
    1343       </p>
    1344       <h2 id="rfc.section.A.2"><a href="#rfc.section.A.2">A.2</a>&nbsp;<a id="conversion.to.canonical.form" href="#conversion.to.canonical.form">Conversion to Canonical Form</a></h2>
    1345       <p id="rfc.section.A.2.p.1">RFC 2045 <a href="#RFC2045" id="rfc.xref.RFC2045.3"><cite title="Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies">[RFC2045]</cite></a> requires that an Internet mail entity be converted to canonical form prior to being transferred, as described in section <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2049#section-4" id="rfc.xref.RFC2049.1">4</a> of RFC 2049 <a href="#RFC2049" id="rfc.xref.RFC2049.2"><cite title="Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Five: Conformance Criteria and Examples">[RFC2049]</cite></a>. <a href="#canonicalization.and.text.defaults" title="Canonicalization and Text Defaults">Section&nbsp;2.3.1</a> of this document describes the forms allowed for subtypes of the "text" media type when transmitted over HTTP. RFC 2046 requires
    1346          that content with a type of "text" represent line breaks as CRLF and forbids the use of CR or LF outside of line break sequences.
    1347          HTTP allows CRLF, bare CR, and bare LF to indicate a line break within text content when a message is transmitted over HTTP.
    1348       </p>
    1349       <p id="rfc.section.A.2.p.2">Where it is possible, a proxy or gateway from HTTP to a strict MIME environment <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> translate all line breaks within the text media types described in <a href="#canonicalization.and.text.defaults" title="Canonicalization and Text Defaults">Section&nbsp;2.3.1</a> of this document to the RFC 2049 canonical form of CRLF. Note, however, that this might be complicated by the presence of
    1350          a Content-Encoding and by the fact that HTTP allows the use of some character sets which do not use octets 13 and 10 to represent
    1351          CR and LF, as is the case for some multi-byte character sets.
    1352       </p>
    1353       <p id="rfc.section.A.2.p.3">Implementors should note that conversion will break any cryptographic checksums applied to the original content unless the
    1354          original content is already in canonical form. Therefore, the canonical form is recommended for any content that uses such
    1355          checksums in HTTP.
    1356       </p>
    1357       <h2 id="rfc.section.A.3"><a href="#rfc.section.A.3">A.3</a>&nbsp;<a id="introduction.of.content-encoding" href="#introduction.of.content-encoding">Introduction of Content-Encoding</a></h2>
    1358       <p id="rfc.section.A.3.p.1">RFC 2045 does not include any concept equivalent to HTTP/1.1's Content-Encoding header field. Since this acts as a modifier
    1359          on the media type, proxies and gateways from HTTP to MIME-compliant protocols <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> either change the value of the Content-Type header field or decode the entity-body before forwarding the message. (Some experimental
    1360          applications of Content-Type for Internet mail have used a media-type parameter of ";conversions=&lt;content-coding&gt;" to perform
    1361          a function equivalent to Content-Encoding. However, this parameter is not part of RFC 2045).
    1362       </p>
    1363       <h2 id="rfc.section.A.4"><a href="#rfc.section.A.4">A.4</a>&nbsp;<a id="no.content-transfer-encoding" href="#no.content-transfer-encoding">No Content-Transfer-Encoding</a></h2>
    1364       <p id="rfc.section.A.4.p.1">HTTP does not use the Content-Transfer-Encoding field of RFC 2045. Proxies and gateways from MIME-compliant protocols to HTTP <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> remove any Content-Transfer-Encoding prior to delivering the response message to an HTTP client.
    1365       </p>
    1366       <p id="rfc.section.A.4.p.2">Proxies and gateways from HTTP to MIME-compliant protocols are responsible for ensuring that the message is in the correct
    1367          format and encoding for safe transport on that protocol, where "safe transport" is defined by the limitations of the protocol
    1368          being used. Such a proxy or gateway <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> label the data with an appropriate Content-Transfer-Encoding if doing so will improve the likelihood of safe transport over
    1369          the destination protocol.
    1370       </p>
    1371       <h2 id="rfc.section.A.5"><a href="#rfc.section.A.5">A.5</a>&nbsp;<a id="introduction.of.transfer-encoding" href="#introduction.of.transfer-encoding">Introduction of Transfer-Encoding</a></h2>
    1372       <p id="rfc.section.A.5.p.1">HTTP/1.1 introduces the Transfer-Encoding header field (<a href="p1-messaging.html#header.transfer-encoding" title="Transfer-Encoding">Section 8.7</a> of <a href="#Part1" id="rfc.xref.Part1.4"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing">[Part1]</cite></a>). Proxies/gateways <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> remove any transfer-coding prior to forwarding a message via a MIME-compliant protocol.
    1373       </p>
    1374       <h2 id="rfc.section.A.6"><a href="#rfc.section.A.6">A.6</a>&nbsp;<a id="mhtml.line.length" href="#mhtml.line.length">MHTML and Line Length Limitations</a></h2>
    1375       <p id="rfc.section.A.6.p.1">HTTP implementations which share code with MHTML <a href="#RFC2110" id="rfc.xref.RFC2110.1"><cite title="MIME E-mail Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents, such as HTML (MHTML)">[RFC2110]</cite></a> implementations need to be aware of MIME line length limitations. Since HTTP does not have this limitation, HTTP does not
    1376          fold long lines. MHTML messages being transported by HTTP follow all conventions of MHTML, including line length limitations
    1377          and folding, canonicalization, etc., since HTTP transports all message-bodies as payload (see <a href="#multipart.types" title="Multipart Types">Section&nbsp;2.3.2</a>) and does not interpret the content or any MIME header lines that might be contained therein.
    1378       </p>
    1379       <h1 id="rfc.section.B"><a href="#rfc.section.B">B.</a>&nbsp;<a id="additional.features" href="#additional.features">Additional Features</a></h1>
    1380       <p id="rfc.section.B.p.1">RFC 1945 and RFC 2068 document protocol elements used by some existing HTTP implementations, but not consistently and correctly
    1381          across most HTTP/1.1 applications. Implementors are advised to be aware of these features, but cannot rely upon their presence
    1382          in, or interoperability with, other HTTP/1.1 applications. Some of these describe proposed experimental features, and some
    1383          describe features that experimental deployment found lacking that are now addressed in the base HTTP/1.1 specification.
    1384       </p>
    1385       <p id="rfc.section.B.p.2">A number of other headers, such as Content-Disposition and Title, from SMTP and MIME are also often implemented (see RFC 2076 <a href="#RFC2076" id="rfc.xref.RFC2076.1"><cite title="Common Internet Message Headers">[RFC2076]</cite></a>).
    1386       </p>
    1387       <div id="rfc.iref.h.10"></div>
    1388       <div id="rfc.iref.c.7"></div>
    1389       <h2 id="rfc.section.B.1"><a href="#rfc.section.B.1">B.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="content-disposition" href="#content-disposition">Content-Disposition</a></h2>
    1390       <p id="rfc.section.B.1.p.1">The Content-Disposition response-header field has been proposed as a means for the origin server to suggest a default filename
    1391          if the user requests that the content is saved to a file. This usage is derived from the definition of Content-Disposition
    1392          in RFC 1806 <a href="#RFC1806" id="rfc.xref.RFC1806.2"><cite title="Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition Header">[RFC1806]</cite></a>.
    1393       </p>
    1394       <div id="rfc.figure.u.34"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.33"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.34"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.35"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.36"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.37"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.38"></span>     content-disposition = "Content-Disposition" ":"
    1395                            disposition-type *( ";" disposition-parm )
    1396      disposition-type = "attachment" | disp-extension-token
    1397      disposition-parm = filename-parm | disp-extension-parm
    1398      filename-parm = "filename" "=" quoted-string
    1399      disp-extension-token = token
    1400      disp-extension-parm = token "=" ( token | quoted-string )
    1401 </pre><p id="rfc.section.B.1.p.3">An example is</p>
    1402       <div id="rfc.figure.u.35"></div><pre class="text">     Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fname.ext"
    1403 </pre><p id="rfc.section.B.1.p.5">The receiving user agent <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> respect any directory path information present in the filename-parm parameter, which is the only parameter believed to apply
    1404          to HTTP implementations at this time. The filename <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be treated as a terminal component only.
    1405       </p>
    1406       <p id="rfc.section.B.1.p.6">If this header is used in a response with the application/octet-stream content-type, the implied suggestion is that the user
    1407          agent should not display the response, but directly enter a `save response as...' dialog.
    1408       </p>
    1409       <p id="rfc.section.B.1.p.7">See <a href="#content-disposition.issues" title="Content-Disposition Issues">Section&nbsp;7.2</a> for Content-Disposition security issues.
    1410       </p>
    1411       <h1 id="rfc.section.C"><a href="#rfc.section.C">C.</a>&nbsp;<a id="changes.from.rfc.2068" href="#changes.from.rfc.2068">Changes from RFC 2068</a></h1>
    1412       <p id="rfc.section.C.p.1">Charset wildcarding is introduced to avoid explosion of character set names in accept headers. (<a href="#header.accept-charset" id="rfc.xref.header.accept-charset.2" title="Accept-Charset">Section&nbsp;5.2</a>)
    1413       </p>
    1414       <p id="rfc.section.C.p.2">Content-Base was deleted from the specification: it was not implemented widely, and there is no simple, safe way to introduce
    1415          it without a robust extension mechanism. In addition, it is used in a similar, but not identical fashion in MHTML <a href="#RFC2110" id="rfc.xref.RFC2110.2"><cite title="MIME E-mail Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents, such as HTML (MHTML)">[RFC2110]</cite></a>.
    1416       </p>
    1417       <p id="rfc.section.C.p.3">A content-coding of "identity" was introduced, to solve problems discovered in caching. (<a href="#content.codings" title="Content Codings">Section&nbsp;2.2</a>)
    1418       </p>
    1419       <p id="rfc.section.C.p.4">Quality Values of zero should indicate that "I don't want something" to allow clients to refuse a representation. (<a href="#quality.values" title="Quality Values">Section&nbsp;2.4</a>)
    1420       </p>
    1421       <p id="rfc.section.C.p.5">The Alternates<span id="rfc.iref.a.5"></span><span id="rfc.iref.h.11"></span>, Content-Version<span id="rfc.iref.c.8"></span><span id="rfc.iref.h.12"></span>, Derived-From<span id="rfc.iref.d.2"></span><span id="rfc.iref.h.13"></span>, Link<span id="rfc.iref.l.1"></span><span id="rfc.iref.h.14"></span>, URI<span id="rfc.iref.u.1"></span><span id="rfc.iref.h.15"></span>, Public<span id="rfc.iref.p.1"></span><span id="rfc.iref.h.16"></span> and Content-Base<span id="rfc.iref.c.9"></span><span id="rfc.iref.h.17"></span> header fields were defined in previous versions of this specification, but not commonly implemented. See RFC 2068 <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a>.
    1422       </p>
    1423       <h1><a id="rfc.copyright" href="#rfc.copyright">Full Copyright Statement</a></h1>
    1424       <p>Copyright © The IETF Trust (2007).</p>
    1425       <p>This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the
    1426          authors retain all their rights.
    1427       </p>
    1428       <p>This document and the information contained herein are provided on an “AS IS” basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION
    1429          HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE
    1430          DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN
    1431          WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
    1432       </p>
    1433       <h1><a id="rfc.ipr" href="#rfc.ipr">Intellectual Property</a></h1>
    1434       <p>The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might
    1435          be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any
    1436          license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to
    1437          identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and
    1438          BCP 79.
    1439       </p>
    1440       <p>Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result
    1441          of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users
    1442          of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at &lt;<a href="http://www.ietf.org/ipr">http://www.ietf.org/ipr</a>&gt;.
    1443       </p>
    1444       <p>The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
    1445          rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF
    1446          at <a href="mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org">ietf-ipr@ietf.org</a>.
    1447       </p>
    1448       <h1>Acknowledgement</h1>
    1449       <p>Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA).</p>
    1450       <h1 id="rfc.index"><a href="#rfc.index">Index</a></h1>
    1451       <p class="noprint"><a href="#rfc.index.A">A</a> <a href="#rfc.index.C">C</a> <a href="#rfc.index.D">D</a> <a href="#rfc.index.G">G</a> <a href="#rfc.index.H">H</a> <a href="#rfc.index.I">I</a> <a href="#rfc.index.L">L</a> <a href="#rfc.index.P">P</a> <a href="#rfc.index.R">R</a> <a href="#rfc.index.U">U</a>
    1452       </p>
    1453       <div class="print2col">
    1454          <ul class="ind">
    1455             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.A" href="#rfc.index.A"><b>A</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1456                   <li class="indline1">Accept header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept.1">2.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept.2">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.a.1"><b>5.1</b></a></li>
    1457                   <li class="indline1">Accept-Charset header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-charset.1">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.a.2"><b>5.2</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-charset.2">C</a></li>
    1458                   <li class="indline1">Accept-Encoding header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-encoding.1">2.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-encoding.2">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.a.3"><b>5.3</b></a></li>
    1459                   <li class="indline1">Accept-Language header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-language.1">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.a.4"><b>5.4</b></a></li>
    1460                   <li class="indline1">Alternates header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.a.5"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1461                </ul>
    1462             </li>
    1463             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.C" href="#rfc.index.C"><b>C</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1464                   <li class="indline1">compress&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.1">2.2</a></li>
    1465                   <li class="indline1">Content-Base header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.9"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1466                   <li class="indline1">Content-Disposition header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.content-disposition.1">7.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.7"><b>B.1</b></a></li>
    1467                   <li class="indline1">Content-Encoding header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-encoding.1">2.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-encoding.2">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.2"><b>5.5</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-encoding.3">5.5</a></li>
    1468                   <li class="indline1">Content-Language header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-language.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.3"><b>5.6</b></a></li>
    1469                   <li class="indline1">Content-Location header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-location.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.4"><b>5.7</b></a></li>
    1470                   <li class="indline1">Content-MD5 header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-md5.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.5"><b>5.8</b></a></li>
    1471                   <li class="indline1">Content-Type header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-type.1">2.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-type.2">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.6"><b>5.9</b></a></li>
    1472                   <li class="indline1">Content-Version header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.8"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1473                </ul>
    1474             </li>
    1475             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.D" href="#rfc.index.D"><b>D</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1476                   <li class="indline1">deflate&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.d.1">2.2</a></li>
    1477                   <li class="indline1">Derived-From header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.d.2"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1478                </ul>
    1479             </li>
    1480             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.G" href="#rfc.index.G"><b>G</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1481                   <li class="indline1"><tt>Grammar</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;
    1482                      <ul class="ind">
    1483                         <li class="indline1"><tt>Accept</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.17"><b>5.1</b></a></li>
    1484                         <li class="indline1"><tt>Accept-Charset</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.21"><b>5.2</b></a></li>
    1485                         <li class="indline1"><tt>Accept-Encoding</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.22"><b>5.3</b></a></li>
    1486                         <li class="indline1"><tt>accept-extension</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.20"><b>5.1</b></a></li>
    1487                         <li class="indline1"><tt>Accept-Language</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.24"><b>5.4</b></a></li>
    1488                         <li class="indline1"><tt>accept-params</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.19"><b>5.1</b></a></li>
    1489                         <li class="indline1"><tt>attribute</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.8"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
    1490                         <li class="indline1"><tt>charset</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.1"><b>2.1</b></a></li>
    1491                         <li class="indline1"><tt>codings</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.23"><b>5.3</b></a></li>
    1492                         <li class="indline1"><tt>content-coding</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.2"><b>2.2</b></a></li>
    1493                         <li class="indline1"><tt>content-disposition</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.33"><b>B.1</b></a></li>
    1494                         <li class="indline1"><tt>Content-Encoding</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.26"><b>5.5</b></a></li>
    1495                         <li class="indline1"><tt>Content-Language</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.27"><b>5.6</b></a></li>
    1496                         <li class="indline1"><tt>Content-Location</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.28"><b>5.7</b></a></li>
    1497                         <li class="indline1"><tt>Content-MD5</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.29"><b>5.8</b></a></li>
    1498                         <li class="indline1"><tt>Content-Type</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.31"><b>5.9</b></a></li>
    1499                         <li class="indline1"><tt>disp-extension-parm</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.38"><b>B.1</b></a></li>
    1500                         <li class="indline1"><tt>disp-extension-token</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.37"><b>B.1</b></a></li>
    1501                         <li class="indline1"><tt>disposition-parm</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.35"><b>B.1</b></a></li>
    1502                         <li class="indline1"><tt>disposition-type</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.34"><b>B.1</b></a></li>
    1503                         <li class="indline1"><tt>entity-body</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.16"><b>3.2</b></a></li>
    1504                         <li class="indline1"><tt>entity-header</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.14"><b>3.1</b></a></li>
    1505                         <li class="indline1"><tt>extension-header</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.15"><b>3.1</b></a></li>
    1506                         <li class="indline1"><tt>filename-parm</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.36"><b>B.1</b></a></li>
    1507                         <li class="indline1"><tt>language-range</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.25"><b>5.4</b></a></li>
    1508                         <li class="indline1"><tt>language-tag</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.11"><b>2.5</b></a></li>
    1509                         <li class="indline1"><tt>md5-digest</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.30"><b>5.8</b></a></li>
    1510                         <li class="indline1"><tt>media-range</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.18"><b>5.1</b></a></li>
    1511                         <li class="indline1"><tt>media-type</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.4"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
    1512                         <li class="indline1"><tt>MIME-Version</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.32"><b>A.1</b></a></li>
    1513                         <li class="indline1"><tt>parameter</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.7"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
    1514                         <li class="indline1"><tt>primary-tag</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.12"><b>2.5</b></a></li>
    1515                         <li class="indline1"><tt>qvalue</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.10"><b>2.4</b></a></li>
    1516                         <li class="indline1"><tt>subtag</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.13"><b>2.5</b></a></li>
    1517                         <li class="indline1"><tt>subtype</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.6"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
    1518                         <li class="indline1"><tt>type</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.5"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
    1519                         <li class="indline1"><tt>value</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.9"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
    1520                      </ul>
    1521                   </li>
    1522                   <li class="indline1">gzip&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.3">2.2</a></li>
    1523                </ul>
    1524             </li>
    1525             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.H" href="#rfc.index.H"><b>H</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1526                   <li class="indline1">Headers&nbsp;&nbsp;
    1527                      <ul class="ind">
    1528                         <li class="indline1">Accept&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept.1">2.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept.2">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.1"><b>5.1</b></a></li>
    1529                         <li class="indline1">Accept-Charset&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-charset.1">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.2"><b>5.2</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-charset.2">C</a></li>
    1530                         <li class="indline1">Accept-Encoding&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-encoding.1">2.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-encoding.2">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.3"><b>5.3</b></a></li>
    1531                         <li class="indline1">Accept-Language&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-language.1">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.4"><b>5.4</b></a></li>
    1532                         <li class="indline1">Alternate&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.11"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1533                         <li class="indline1">Content-Base&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.17"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1534                         <li class="indline1">Content-Disposition&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.content-disposition.1">7.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.10"><b>B.1</b></a></li>
    1535                         <li class="indline1">Content-Encoding&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-encoding.1">2.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-encoding.2">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.5"><b>5.5</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-encoding.3">5.5</a></li>
    1536                         <li class="indline1">Content-Language&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-language.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.6"><b>5.6</b></a></li>
    1537                         <li class="indline1">Content-Location&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-location.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.7"><b>5.7</b></a></li>
    1538                         <li class="indline1">Content-MD5&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-md5.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.8"><b>5.8</b></a></li>
    1539                         <li class="indline1">Content-Type&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-type.1">2.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-type.2">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.9"><b>5.9</b></a></li>
    1540                         <li class="indline1">Content-Version&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.12"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1541                         <li class="indline1">Derived-From&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.13"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1542                         <li class="indline1">Link&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.14"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1543                         <li class="indline1">Public&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.16"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1544                         <li class="indline1">URI&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.15"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1545                      </ul>
    1546                   </li>
    1547                </ul>
    1548             </li>
    1549             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.I" href="#rfc.index.I"><b>I</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1550                   <li class="indline1">identity&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.i.1">2.2</a></li>
    1551                </ul>
    1552             </li>
    1553             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.L" href="#rfc.index.L"><b>L</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1554                   <li class="indline1">Link header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.l.1"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1555                </ul>
    1556             </li>
    1557             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.P" href="#rfc.index.P"><b>P</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1558                   <li class="indline1"><em>Part1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part1.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part1.2">3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part1.3">3.2.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#Part1"><b>9</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part1.4">A.5</a><ul class="ind">
    1559                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 4.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part1.2">3.2</a></li>
    1560                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 4.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part1.3">3.2.2</a></li>
    1561                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 8.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part1.1">3.1</a></li>
    1562                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 8.7</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part1.4">A.5</a></li>
    1563                      </ul>
    1564                   </li>
    1565                   <li class="indline1"><em>Part2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#Part2"><b>9</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1566                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 10.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">3.1</a></li>
    1567                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 10.9</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">4.1</a></li>
    1568                      </ul>
    1569                   </li>
    1570                   <li class="indline1"><em>Part4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part4.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#Part4"><b>9</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1571                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 6.6</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part4.1">3.1</a></li>
    1572                      </ul>
    1573                   </li>
    1574                   <li class="indline1"><em>Part5</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part5.1">2.3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part5.2">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#Part5"><b>9</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1575                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 5.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part5.2">3.1</a></li>
    1576                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section A</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part5.1">2.3.2</a></li>
    1577                      </ul>
    1578                   </li>
    1579                   <li class="indline1"><em>Part6</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part6.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part6.2">4.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part6.3">5.7</a>, <a class="iref" href="#Part6"><b>9</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1580                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 3.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.Part6.1">3.1</a></li>
    1581                      </ul>
    1582                   </li>
    1583                   <li class="indline1">Public header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.p.1"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1584                </ul>
    1585             </li>
    1586             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.R" href="#rfc.index.R"><b>R</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1587                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC1766</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1766.1">2.5</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC1766"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1588                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC1806</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1806.1">7.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC1806"><b>9</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1806.2">B.1</a></li>
    1589                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC1864</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1864.1">5.8</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC1864"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1590                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC1867</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1867.1">2.3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC1867"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1591                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC1950</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1950.1">2.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC1950"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1592                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC1951</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1951.1">2.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC1951"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1593                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC1952</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1952.1">2.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC1952"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1594                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2045</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#RFC2045"><b>9</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2045.1">A</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2045.2">A.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2045.3">A.2</a></li>
    1595                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2046</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2046.1">2.3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2046.2">2.3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2046"><b>9</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1596                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 5.1.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2046.1">2.3.2</a></li>
    1597                      </ul>
    1598                   </li>
    1599                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2049</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#RFC2049"><b>9</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2049.1">A.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2049.2">A.2</a><ul class="ind">
    1600                         <li class="indline1"><em>Section 4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2049.1">A.2</a></li>
    1601                      </ul>
    1602                   </li>
    1603                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2068</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#RFC2068"><b>9</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.1">C</a></li>
    1604                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2076</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#RFC2076"><b>9</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2076.1">B</a></li>
    1605                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2110</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#RFC2110"><b>9</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2110.1">A.6</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2110.2">C</a></li>
    1606                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2183</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2183.1">7.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2183"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1607                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2277</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2277.1">2.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2277"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1608                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2279</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2279.1">2.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2279"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1609                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2616</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">§</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2616"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1610                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC4288</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC4288.1">2.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC4288.2">2.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC4288"><b>9</b></a></li>
    1611                   <li class="indline1"><em>RFC822</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#RFC822"><b>9</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC822.1">A</a></li>
    1612                </ul>
    1613             </li>
    1614             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.U" href="#rfc.index.U"><b>U</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1615                   <li class="indline1">URI header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.u.1"><b>C</b></a></li>
    1616                </ul>
    1617             </li>
    1618          </ul>
    1619       </div>
    1620    </body>
    1621 </html>
     965           

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p3-payload.xml

    r95 r96  
    224224   relevant sections of RFC 2616 without edit.
    225225</t>
     226
     227<section title="Requirements" anchor="intro.requirements">
     228<t>
     229   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
     230   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
     231   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
     232</t>
     233<t>
     234   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
     235   of the &MUST; or &REQUIRED; level requirements for the protocols it
     236   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the &MUST; or &REQUIRED;
     237   level and all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its protocols is said
     238   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the &MUST;
     239   level requirements but not all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its
     240   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     241</t>
     242</section>
    226243</section>
    227244
    … …  
    20682085</reference>
    20692086
     2087<reference anchor="RFC2119">
     2088  <front>
     2089    <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
     2090    <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
     2091      <organization>Harvard University</organization>
     2092      <address><email>sob@harvard.edu</email></address>
     2093    </author>
     2094    <date month="March" year="1997"/>
     2095  </front>
     2096  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
     2097  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
     2098</reference>
     2099
    20702100<reference anchor="RFC2279">
    20712101<front>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p4-conditional.html

    r95 r96  
    483483      <h1 class="np" id="rfc.toc"><a href="#rfc.toc">Table of Contents</a></h1>
    484484      <ul class="toc">
    485          <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li>
     485         <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a><ul class="toc">
     486               <li class="tocline1">1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></li>
     487            </ul>
     488         </li>
    486489         <li class="tocline0">2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#entity.tags">Entity Tags</a></li>
    487490         <li class="tocline0">3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.3">Status Code Definitions</a><ul class="toc">
    … …  
    512515      <p id="rfc.section.1.p.1">This document will define aspects of HTTP related to conditional request messages based on time stamps and entity-tags. Right
    513516         now it only includes the extracted relevant sections of <a href="#RFC2616">RFC 2616</a> <cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">[RFC2616]</cite> without edit.
     517      </p>
     518      <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="intro.requirements" href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></h2>
     519      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
     520         in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>.
     521      </p>
     522      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.2">An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level and all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> level requirements but not all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
    514523      </p>
    515524      <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a>&nbsp;<a id="entity.tags" href="#entity.tags">Entity Tags</a></h1>
    … …  
    879888      <h1 id="rfc.references"><a href="#rfc.section.10" id="rfc.section.10">10.</a> References
    880889      </h1>
    881       <table summary="References">         
     890      <table summary="References">           
    882891         <tr>
    883892            <td class="reference"><b id="Part1">[Part1]</b></td>
    … …  
    898907            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2068">[RFC2068]</b></td>
    899908            <td class="top"><a title="University of California, Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science">Fielding, R.</a>, <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Digital Equipment Corporation, Western Research Laboratory">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Nielsen, H.</a>, and <a title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">T. Berners-Lee</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2068, January&nbsp;1997.
     909            </td>
     910         </tr>
     911         <tr>
     912            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2119">[RFC2119]</b></td>
     913            <td class="top"><a title="Harvard University">Bradner, S.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>”, BCP&nbsp;14, RFC&nbsp;2119, March&nbsp;1997.
    900914            </td>
    901915         </tr>
    … …  
    10271041                     </ul>
    10281042                  </li>
     1043                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2119</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2119.1">1.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2119"><b>10</b></a></li>
    10291044                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2616</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">§</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2616"><b>10</b></a></li>
    10301045               </ul>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p4-conditional.xml

    r95 r96  
    220220   without edit.
    221221</t>
     222
     223<section title="Requirements" anchor="intro.requirements">
     224<t>
     225   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
     226   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
     227   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
     228</t>
     229<t>
     230   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
     231   of the &MUST; or &REQUIRED; level requirements for the protocols it
     232   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the &MUST; or &REQUIRED;
     233   level and all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its protocols is said
     234   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the &MUST;
     235   level requirements but not all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its
     236   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     237</t>
     238</section>
    222239</section>
    223240
    … …  
    10971114   </front>
    10981115   <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2616"/>
     1116</reference>
     1117
     1118<reference anchor="RFC2119">
     1119  <front>
     1120    <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
     1121    <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
     1122      <organization>Harvard University</organization>
     1123      <address><email>sob@harvard.edu</email></address>
     1124    </author>
     1125    <date month="March" year="1997"/>
     1126  </front>
     1127  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
     1128  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
    10991129</reference>
    11001130

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p5-range.html

    r95 r96  
    484484      <h1 class="np" id="rfc.toc"><a href="#rfc.toc">Table of Contents</a></h1>
    485485      <ul class="toc">
    486          <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li>
     486         <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a><ul class="toc">
     487               <li class="tocline1">1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></li>
     488            </ul>
     489         </li>
    487490         <li class="tocline0">2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#range.units">Range Units</a></li>
    488491         <li class="tocline0">3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.3">Status Code Definitions</a><ul class="toc">
    … …  
    517520         type. Right now it only includes the extracted relevant sections of <a href="#RFC2616">RFC 2616</a> <cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">[RFC2616]</cite> without edit.
    518521      </p>
     522      <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="intro.requirements" href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></h2>
     523      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
     524         in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>.
     525      </p>
     526      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.2">An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level and all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> level requirements but not all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     527      </p>
    519528      <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a>&nbsp;<a id="range.units" href="#range.units">Range Units</a></h1>
    520529      <p id="rfc.section.2.p.1">HTTP/1.1 allows a client to request that only part (a range of) the response entity be included within the response. HTTP/1.1
    … …  
    768777      <h1 id="rfc.references"><a href="#rfc.section.9" id="rfc.section.9">9.</a> References
    769778      </h1>
    770       <table summary="References">       
     779      <table summary="References">         
    771780         <tr>
    772781            <td class="reference"><b id="Part1">[Part1]</b></td>
    … …  
    782791            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2046">[RFC2046]</b></td>
    783792            <td class="top"><a title="Innosoft International, Inc.">Freed, N.</a> and <a title="First Virtual Holdings">N. Borenstein</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2046">Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2046, November&nbsp;1996.
     793            </td>
     794         </tr>
     795         <tr>
     796            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2119">[RFC2119]</b></td>
     797            <td class="top"><a title="Harvard University">Bradner, S.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>”, BCP&nbsp;14, RFC&nbsp;2119, March&nbsp;1997.
    784798            </td>
    785799         </tr>
    … …  
    979993                  <li class="indline1">Range header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.range.1">2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.range.2">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.range.3">3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.r.1"><b>5.4</b></a></li>
    980994                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2046</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#RFC2046"><b>9</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2046.1">A</a></li>
     995                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2119</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2119.1">1.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2119"><b>9</b></a></li>
    981996                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2616</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">§</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2616"><b>9</b></a></li>
    982997               </ul>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p5-range.xml

    r95 r96  
    215215   <xref target="RFC2616">RFC 2616</xref> without edit.
    216216</t>
     217
     218<section title="Requirements" anchor="intro.requirements">
     219<t>
     220   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
     221   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
     222   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
     223</t>
     224<t>
     225   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
     226   of the &MUST; or &REQUIRED; level requirements for the protocols it
     227   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the &MUST; or &REQUIRED;
     228   level and all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its protocols is said
     229   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the &MUST;
     230   level requirements but not all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its
     231   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     232</t>
     233</section>
    217234</section>
    218235
    … …  
    890907</reference>
    891908
     909<reference anchor="RFC2119">
     910  <front>
     911    <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
     912    <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
     913      <organization>Harvard University</organization>
     914      <address><email>sob@harvard.edu</email></address>
     915    </author>
     916    <date month="March" year="1997"/>
     917  </front>
     918  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
     919  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
     920</reference>
     921
    892922</references>
    893923

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p6-cache.html

    r95 r96  
    483483      <ul class="toc">
    484484         <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a><ul class="toc">
    485                <li class="tocline1">1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#intro.terminology">Terminology</a></li>
    486                <li class="tocline1">1.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#delta.seconds">Delta Seconds</a></li>
     485               <li class="tocline1">1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></li>
     486               <li class="tocline1">1.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#intro.terminology">Terminology</a></li>
     487               <li class="tocline1">1.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#delta.seconds">Delta Seconds</a></li>
    487488            </ul>
    488489         </li>
    … …  
    559560         sections of <a href="#RFC2616">RFC 2616</a> <cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">[RFC2616]</cite> without edit.
    560561      </p>
    561       <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="intro.terminology" href="#intro.terminology">Terminology</a></h2>
    562       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">This specification uses a number of terms to refer to the roles played by participants in, and objects of, the HTTP communication.</p>
    563       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.2"> <span id="rfc.iref.c.1"></span>  <dfn>cache</dfn> 
     562      <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="intro.requirements" href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></h2>
     563      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
     564         in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>.
     565      </p>
     566      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.2">An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level and all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> level requirements but not all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     567      </p>
     568      <h2 id="rfc.section.1.2"><a href="#rfc.section.1.2">1.2</a>&nbsp;<a id="intro.terminology" href="#intro.terminology">Terminology</a></h2>
     569      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.1">This specification uses a number of terms to refer to the roles played by participants in, and objects of, the HTTP communication.</p>
     570      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.2"> <span id="rfc.iref.c.1"></span>  <dfn>cache</dfn> 
    564571      </p>
    565572      <dl class="empty">
    … …  
    569576         </dd>
    570577      </dl>
    571       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.3"> <span id="rfc.iref.c.2"></span>  <dfn>cacheable</dfn> 
     578      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.3"> <span id="rfc.iref.c.2"></span>  <dfn>cacheable</dfn> 
    572579      </p>
    573580      <dl class="empty">
    … …  
    577584         </dd>
    578585      </dl>
    579       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.4"> <span id="rfc.iref.f.1"></span>  <dfn>first-hand</dfn> 
     586      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.4"> <span id="rfc.iref.f.1"></span>  <dfn>first-hand</dfn> 
    580587      </p>
    581588      <dl class="empty">
    … …  
    584591         </dd>
    585592      </dl>
    586       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.5"> <span id="rfc.iref.e.1"></span>  <dfn>explicit expiration time</dfn> 
     593      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.5"> <span id="rfc.iref.e.1"></span>  <dfn>explicit expiration time</dfn> 
    587594      </p>
    588595      <dl class="empty">
    589596         <dd>The time at which the origin server intends that an entity should no longer be returned by a cache without further validation.</dd>
    590597      </dl>
    591       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.6"> <span id="rfc.iref.h.1"></span>  <dfn>heuristic expiration time</dfn> 
     598      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.6"> <span id="rfc.iref.h.1"></span>  <dfn>heuristic expiration time</dfn> 
    592599      </p>
    593600      <dl class="empty">
    594601         <dd>An expiration time assigned by a cache when no explicit expiration time is available.</dd>
    595602      </dl>
    596       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.7"> <span id="rfc.iref.a.1"></span>  <dfn>age</dfn> 
     603      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.7"> <span id="rfc.iref.a.1"></span>  <dfn>age</dfn> 
    597604      </p>
    598605      <dl class="empty">
    599606         <dd>The age of a response is the time since it was sent by, or successfully validated with, the origin server.</dd>
    600607      </dl>
    601       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.8"> <span id="rfc.iref.f.2"></span>  <dfn>freshness lifetime</dfn> 
     608      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.8"> <span id="rfc.iref.f.2"></span>  <dfn>freshness lifetime</dfn> 
    602609      </p>
    603610      <dl class="empty">
    604611         <dd>The length of time between the generation of a response and its expiration time.</dd>
    605612      </dl>
    606       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.9"> <span id="rfc.iref.f.3"></span>  <dfn>fresh</dfn> 
     613      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.9"> <span id="rfc.iref.f.3"></span>  <dfn>fresh</dfn> 
    607614      </p>
    608615      <dl class="empty">
    609616         <dd>A response is fresh if its age has not yet exceeded its freshness lifetime.</dd>
    610617      </dl>
    611       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.10"> <span id="rfc.iref.s.1"></span>  <dfn>stale</dfn> 
     618      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.10"> <span id="rfc.iref.s.1"></span>  <dfn>stale</dfn> 
    612619      </p>
    613620      <dl class="empty">
    614621         <dd>A response is stale if its age has passed its freshness lifetime.</dd>
    615622      </dl>
    616       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.11"> <span id="rfc.iref.s.2"></span>  <dfn>semantically transparent</dfn> 
     623      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.11"> <span id="rfc.iref.s.2"></span>  <dfn>semantically transparent</dfn> 
    617624      </p>
    618625      <dl class="empty">
    … …  
    623630         </dd>
    624631      </dl>
    625       <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.12"> <span id="rfc.iref.v.1"></span>  <dfn>validator</dfn> 
     632      <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.12"> <span id="rfc.iref.v.1"></span>  <dfn>validator</dfn> 
    626633      </p>
    627634      <dl class="empty">
    … …  
    630637         </dd>
    631638      </dl>
    632       <h2 id="rfc.section.1.2"><a href="#rfc.section.1.2">1.2</a>&nbsp;<a id="delta.seconds" href="#delta.seconds">Delta Seconds</a></h2>
    633       <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.1">Some HTTP header fields allow a time value to be specified as an integer number of seconds, represented in decimal, after
     639      <h2 id="rfc.section.1.3"><a href="#rfc.section.1.3">1.3</a>&nbsp;<a id="delta.seconds" href="#delta.seconds">Delta Seconds</a></h2>
     640      <p id="rfc.section.1.3.p.1">Some HTTP header fields allow a time value to be specified as an integer number of seconds, represented in decimal, after
    634641         the time that the message was received.
    635642      </p>
    … …  
    17161723      <h1 id="rfc.references"><a href="#rfc.section.7" id="rfc.section.7">7.</a> References
    17171724      </h1>
    1718       <table summary="References">                 
     1725      <table summary="References">                   
    17191726         <tr>
    17201727            <td class="reference"><b id="Part1">[Part1]</b></td>
    … …  
    17551762            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2047">[RFC2047]</b></td>
    17561763            <td class="top"><a title="University of Tennessee">Moore, K.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2047">MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2047, November&nbsp;1996.
     1764            </td>
     1765         </tr>
     1766         <tr>
     1767            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2119">[RFC2119]</b></td>
     1768            <td class="top"><a title="Harvard University">Bradner, S.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>”, BCP&nbsp;14, RFC&nbsp;2119, March&nbsp;1997.
    17571769            </td>
    17581770         </tr>
    … …  
    18191831         <ul class="ind">
    18201832            <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.A" href="#rfc.index.A"><b>A</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1821                   <li class="indline1">age&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.a.1">1.1</a></li>
     1833                  <li class="indline1">age&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.a.1">1.2</a></li>
    18221834                  <li class="indline1">Age header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.a.2"><b>3.1</b></a></li>
    18231835               </ul>
    18241836            </li>
    18251837            <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.C" href="#rfc.index.C"><b>C</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1826                   <li class="indline1">cache&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.1">1.1</a></li>
     1838                  <li class="indline1">cache&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.1">1.2</a></li>
    18271839                  <li class="indline1">Cache Directives&nbsp;&nbsp;
    18281840                     <ul class="ind">
    … …  
    18421854                  </li>
    18431855                  <li class="indline1">Cache-Control header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.1">2.1.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.2">2.1.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.3">2.1.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.4">2.2.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.5">2.2.5</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.6">2.4</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.7">2.4</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.8">2.8</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.3"><b>3.2</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.9">3.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.10">3.4</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.cache-control.11">A</a></li>
    1844                   <li class="indline1">cacheable&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.2">1.1</a></li>
     1856                  <li class="indline1">cacheable&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.c.2">1.2</a></li>
    18451857               </ul>
    18461858            </li>
    18471859            <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.E" href="#rfc.index.E"><b>E</b></a><ul class="ind">
    18481860                  <li class="indline1">Expires header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.expires.1">2.4</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.expires.2">3.2.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.e.2"><b>3.3</b></a></li>
    1849                   <li class="indline1">explicit expiration time&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.e.1">1.1</a></li>
     1861                  <li class="indline1">explicit expiration time&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.e.1">1.2</a></li>
    18501862               </ul>
    18511863            </li>
    18521864            <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.F" href="#rfc.index.F"><b>F</b></a><ul class="ind">
    1853                   <li class="indline1">first-hand&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.f.1">1.1</a></li>
    1854                   <li class="indline1">fresh&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.f.3">1.1</a></li>
    1855                   <li class="indline1">freshness lifetime&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.f.2">1.1</a></li>
     1865                  <li class="indline1">first-hand&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.f.1">1.2</a></li>
     1866                  <li class="indline1">fresh&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.f.3">1.2</a></li>
     1867                  <li class="indline1">freshness lifetime&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.f.2">1.2</a></li>
    18561868               </ul>
    18571869            </li>
    … …  
    18661878                        <li class="indline1"><tt>cache-request-directive</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.6"><b>3.2</b></a></li>
    18671879                        <li class="indline1"><tt>cache-response-directive</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.7"><b>3.2</b></a></li>
    1868                         <li class="indline1"><tt>delta-seconds</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.1"><b>1.2</b></a></li>
     1880                        <li class="indline1"><tt>delta-seconds</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.1"><b>1.3</b></a></li>
    18691881                        <li class="indline1"><tt>Expires</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.9"><b>3.3</b></a></li>
    18701882                        <li class="indline1"><tt>extension-pragma</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.g.12"><b>3.4</b></a></li>
    … …  
    18931905                     </ul>
    18941906                  </li>
    1895                   <li class="indline1">heuristic expiration time&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.1">1.1</a></li>
     1907                  <li class="indline1">heuristic expiration time&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.1">1.2</a></li>
    18961908               </ul>
    18971909            </li>
    … …  
    19972009                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC1305</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC1305.1">2.2.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC1305"><b>7</b></a></li>
    19982010                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2047</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2047.1">3.6</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2047"><b>7</b></a></li>
     2011                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2119</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2119.1">1.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2119"><b>7</b></a></li>
    19992012                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2616</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">§</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2616"><b>7</b></a></li>
    20002013               </ul>
    … …  
    20062019                     </ul>
    20072020                  </li>
    2008                   <li class="indline1">semantically transparent&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.s.2">1.1</a></li>
    2009                   <li class="indline1">stale&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.s.1">1.1</a></li>
     2021                  <li class="indline1">semantically transparent&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.s.2">1.2</a></li>
     2022                  <li class="indline1">stale&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.s.1">1.2</a></li>
    20102023               </ul>
    20112024            </li>
    20122025            <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.V" href="#rfc.index.V"><b>V</b></a><ul class="ind">
    2013                   <li class="indline1">validator&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.v.1">1.1</a></li>
     2026                  <li class="indline1">validator&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.v.1">1.2</a></li>
    20142027                  <li class="indline1">Vary header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.vary.1">2.6</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.v.2"><b>3.5</b></a></li>
    20152028               </ul>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p6-cache.xml

    r95 r96  
    227227</t>
    228228
     229<section title="Requirements" anchor="intro.requirements">
     230<t>
     231   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
     232   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
     233   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
     234</t>
     235<t>
     236   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
     237   of the &MUST; or &REQUIRED; level requirements for the protocols it
     238   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the &MUST; or &REQUIRED;
     239   level and all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its protocols is said
     240   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the &MUST;
     241   level requirements but not all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its
     242   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     243</t>
     244</section>
     245
    229246<section title="Terminology" anchor="intro.terminology">
    230247<t>
    … …  
    27112728</reference>
    27122729
     2730<reference anchor="RFC2119">
     2731  <front>
     2732    <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
     2733    <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
     2734      <organization>Harvard University</organization>
     2735      <address><email>sob@harvard.edu</email></address>
     2736    </author>
     2737    <date month="March" year="1997"/>
     2738  </front>
     2739  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
     2740  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
     2741</reference>
     2742
    27132743<reference anchor="RFC2616">
    27142744   <front>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p7-auth.html

    r95 r96  
    481481      <h1 class="np" id="rfc.toc"><a href="#rfc.toc">Table of Contents</a></h1>
    482482      <ul class="toc">
    483          <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li>
     483         <li class="tocline0">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a><ul class="toc">
     484               <li class="tocline1">1.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></li>
     485            </ul>
     486         </li>
    484487         <li class="tocline0">2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.2">Status Code Definitions</a><ul class="toc">
    485488               <li class="tocline1">2.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#status.401">401 Unauthorized</a></li>
    … …  
    513516         "digest" authentication, are specified in "HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication" <a href="#RFC2617" id="rfc.xref.RFC2617.1"><cite title="HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication">[RFC2617]</cite></a>. This specification adopts the definitions of "challenge" and "credentials" from that specification.
    514517      </p>
     518      <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="intro.requirements" href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></h2>
     519      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
     520         in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>.
     521      </p>
     522      <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.2">An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level and all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> level requirements but not all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     523      </p>
    515524      <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a>&nbsp;Status Code Definitions
    516525      </h1>
    … …  
    621630      <h1 id="rfc.references"><a href="#rfc.section.7" id="rfc.section.7">7.</a> References
    622631      </h1>
    623       <table summary="References">     
     632      <table summary="References">       
    624633         <tr>
    625634            <td class="reference"><b id="Part6">[Part6]</b></td>
    626635            <td class="top"><a title="Day Software">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a title="One Laptop per Child">Gettys, J.</a>, <a title="Hewlett-Packard Company">Mogul, J.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a title="Adobe Systems, Incorporated">Masinter, L.</a>, <a title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, and <a title="World Wide Web Consortium">T. Berners-Lee</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest">HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest (work in progress), December&nbsp;2007.
     636            </td>
     637         </tr>
     638         <tr>
     639            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2119">[RFC2119]</b></td>
     640            <td class="top"><a title="Harvard University">Bradner, S.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>”, BCP&nbsp;14, RFC&nbsp;2119, March&nbsp;1997.
    627641            </td>
    628642         </tr>
    … …  
    727741            </li>
    728742            <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.R" href="#rfc.index.R"><b>R</b></a><ul class="ind">
     743                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2119</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2119.1">1.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2119"><b>7</b></a></li>
    729744                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2616</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">§</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2616"><b>7</b></a></li>
    730745                  <li class="indline1"><em>RFC2617</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2617.1">1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2617.2">2.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2617.3">2.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2617.4">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2617.5">3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2617.6">3.3</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.RFC2617.7">3.4</a>, <a class="iref" href="#RFC2617"><b>7</b></a></li>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p7-auth.xml

    r95 r96  
    222222   from that specification.
    223223</t>
     224
     225<section title="Requirements" anchor="intro.requirements">
     226<t>
     227   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
     228   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
     229   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
     230</t>
     231<t>
     232   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
     233   of the &MUST; or &REQUIRED; level requirements for the protocols it
     234   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the &MUST; or &REQUIRED;
     235   level and all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its protocols is said
     236   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the &MUST;
     237   level requirements but not all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its
     238   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     239</t>
     240</section>
    224241</section>
    225242
    … …  
    487504</reference>
    488505
     506<reference anchor="RFC2119">
     507  <front>
     508    <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
     509    <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
     510      <organization>Harvard University</organization>
     511      <address><email>sob@harvard.edu</email></address>
     512    </author>
     513    <date month="March" year="1997"/>
     514  </front>
     515  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
     516  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
     517</reference>
     518
    489519<reference anchor="RFC2616">
    490520   <front>
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.