Changeset 911 for draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p6-cache.xml

Timestamp:

Jul 24, 2010, 2:23:44 AM (9 years ago)

Author:

julian.reschke@…

Message:

Remove "Changes from RFC 2068" sections (see #220)

File:

• draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p6-cache.xml (modified) (3 diffs)

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p6-cache.xml

@@ -2138 +2138 @@
 </references>
 
-<section anchor="compatibility" title="Compatibility with Previous Versions">
-
-<section anchor="changes.from.rfc.2068" title="Changes from RFC 2068">
-<t>
-  A case was missed in the Cache-Control model of HTTP/1.1; s-maxage was introduced to add
-  this missing case.
-  (Sections <xref format="counter" target="response.cacheability" />, <xref format="counter" target="header.cache-control" />).
-</t>
-<t>
-  Range request responses would become very verbose if all meta-data were always returned;
-  by allowing the server to only send needed headers in a 206 response, this problem can be
-  avoided.
-  (<xref target="combining.headers" />)
-</t>
-<t>
-  The Cache-Control: max-age directive was not properly defined for responses.
-  (<xref target="cache-response-directive"/>)
-</t>
-<t>
-  Warnings could be cached incorrectly, or not updated appropriately. (Section <xref
-    format="counter" target="expiration.model" />, <xref format="counter"
-    target="combining.headers" />, <xref format="counter" target="header.cache-control" />,
-  and <xref format="counter" target="header.warning" />) Warning also needed to be a general
-  header, as PUT or other methods may have need for it in requests.
-</t>
-</section>
-
 <section anchor="changes.from.rfc.2616" title="Changes from RFC 2616">
 <t>
@@ -2185 +2158 @@
 </t>
 </section>
-
-    </section>
 
 <?BEGININC p6-cache.abnf-appendix ?>
@@ -2507 +2478 @@
 <section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-10" anchor="changes.since.10">
 <t>
-  None yet.
+  Closed issues:
+  <list style="symbols"> 
+    <t>
+      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/220"/>:
+      "consider removing the 'changes from 2068' sections"
+    </t>
+  </list>
 </t>
 </section>