Changeset 870


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 22, 2010, 6:01:47 AM (9 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

add a pointer to issue #221 to the inline comment

Location:
draft-ietf-httpbis/latest
Files:
2 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.html

    r868 r870  
    14121412         </li>
    14131413         <li>the character sequence "://",</li>
    1414          <li>the authority component, as specified in the Host header (<a href="#header.host" id="rfc.xref.header.host.1" title="Host">Section&nbsp;9.4</a>) and determined by the rules in <a href="#the.resource.identified.by.a.request" title="The Resource Identified by a Request">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>, <span class="comment" id="effrequri-nohost">[<a href="#effrequri-nohost" class="smpl">effrequri-nohost</a>: Do we need to include the handling of missing hosts in HTTP/1.0 messages, as described in <a href="#the.resource.identified.by.a.request" title="The Resource Identified by a Request">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>? --jre]</span> and
     1414         <li>the authority component, as specified in the Host header (<a href="#header.host" id="rfc.xref.header.host.1" title="Host">Section&nbsp;9.4</a>) and determined by the rules in <a href="#the.resource.identified.by.a.request" title="The Resource Identified by a Request">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>, <span class="comment" id="effrequri-nohost">[<a href="#effrequri-nohost" class="smpl">effrequri-nohost</a>: Do we need to include the handling of missing hosts in HTTP/1.0 messages, as described in <a href="#the.resource.identified.by.a.request" title="The Resource Identified by a Request">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>? -- See &lt;<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/221">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/221</a>&gt; --jre]</span> and
    14151415         </li>
    14161416         <li>the request-target obtained from the Request-Line, unless the request-target is just the asterisk "*".</li>
  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.xml

    r866 r870  
    16571657      <xref target="the.resource.identified.by.a.request"/>,
    16581658      <cref anchor="effrequri-nohost" source="jre">Do we need to include the handling of missing hosts in HTTP/1.0 messages, as
    1659       described in <xref target="the.resource.identified.by.a.request"/>?</cref>
     1659      described in <xref target="the.resource.identified.by.a.request"/>? -- See <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/221"/></cref>
    16601660      and
    16611661    </t>
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.