Changeset 870

Timestamp:

Jul 22, 2010, 6:01:47 AM (9 years ago)

Author:

julian.reschke@…

Message:

add a pointer to issue #221 to the inline comment

Location:

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest

Files:

• p1-messaging.html (modified) (1 diff)
• p1-messaging.xml (modified) (1 diff)

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.html

@@ -1412 +1412 @@
          </li>
          <li>the character sequence "://",</li>
-         <li>the authority component, as specified in the Host header (<a href="#header.host" id="rfc.xref.header.host.1" title="Host">Section&nbsp;9.4</a>) and determined by the rules in <a href="#the.resource.identified.by.a.request" title="The Resource Identified by a Request">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>, <span class="comment" id="effrequri-nohost">[<a href="#effrequri-nohost" class="smpl">effrequri-nohost</a>: Do we need to include the handling of missing hosts in HTTP/1.0 messages, as described in <a href="#the.resource.identified.by.a.request" title="The Resource Identified by a Request">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>? --jre]</span> and
+         <li>the authority component, as specified in the Host header (<a href="#header.host" id="rfc.xref.header.host.1" title="Host">Section&nbsp;9.4</a>) and determined by the rules in <a href="#the.resource.identified.by.a.request" title="The Resource Identified by a Request">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>, <span class="comment" id="effrequri-nohost">[<a href="#effrequri-nohost" class="smpl">effrequri-nohost</a>: Do we need to include the handling of missing hosts in HTTP/1.0 messages, as described in <a href="#the.resource.identified.by.a.request" title="The Resource Identified by a Request">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>? -- See &lt;<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/221">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/221</a>&gt; --jre]</span> and
          </li>
          <li>the request-target obtained from the Request-Line, unless the request-target is just the asterisk "*".</li>

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.xml

@@ -1657 +1657 @@
       <xref target="the.resource.identified.by.a.request"/>,
       <cref anchor="effrequri-nohost" source="jre">Do we need to include the handling of missing hosts in HTTP/1.0 messages, as
-      described in <xref target="the.resource.identified.by.a.request"/>?</cref>
+      described in <xref target="the.resource.identified.by.a.request"/>? -- See <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/221"/></cref>
       and
     </t>