Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 12, 2010, 4:11:48 AM (9 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

Make requirements sections consistent again.

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p5-range.xml

    r844 r847  
    243243<t>
    244244   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
    245    of the &MUST; or &REQUIRED; level requirements for the protocols it
    246    implements. An implementation that satisfies all the &MUST; or &REQUIRED;
    247    level and all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its protocols is said
    248    to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the &MUST;
    249    level requirements but not all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its
    250    protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     245   of the "MUST" or "REQUIRED" level requirements for the protocols it
     246   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the "MUST" or "REQUIRED"
     247   level and all the "SHOULD" level requirements for its protocols is said
     248   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the "MUST"
     249   level requirements but not all the "SHOULD" level requirements for its
     250   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant".
    251251</t>
    252252</section>
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.