Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 12, 2010, 4:11:48 AM (9 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

Make requirements sections consistent again.

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • draft-ietf-httpbis/10/p7-auth.xml

    r845 r847  
    234234<t>
    235235   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
    236    of the &MUST; or &REQUIRED; level requirements for the protocols it
    237    implements. An implementation that satisfies all the &MUST; or &REQUIRED;
    238    level and all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its protocols is said
    239    to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the &MUST;
    240    level requirements but not all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its
    241    protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     236   of the "MUST" or "REQUIRED" level requirements for the protocols it
     237   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the "MUST" or "REQUIRED"
     238   level and all the "SHOULD" level requirements for its protocols is said
     239   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the "MUST"
     240   level requirements but not all the "SHOULD" level requirements for its
     241   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant".
    242242</t>
    243243</section>
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.