Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 12, 2010, 4:11:48 AM (9 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

Make requirements sections consistent again.

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • draft-ietf-httpbis/10/p2-semantics.xml

    r845 r847  
    293293<t>
    294294   An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
    295    of the &MUST; or &REQUIRED; level requirements for the protocols it
    296    implements. An implementation that satisfies all the &MUST; or &REQUIRED;
    297    level and all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its protocols is said
    298    to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the &MUST;
    299    level requirements but not all the &SHOULD; level requirements for its
    300    protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant."
     295   of the "MUST" or "REQUIRED" level requirements for the protocols it
     296   implements. An implementation that satisfies all the "MUST" or "REQUIRED"
     297   level and all the "SHOULD" level requirements for its protocols is said
     298   to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the "MUST"
     299   level requirements but not all the "SHOULD" level requirements for its
     300   protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant".
    301301</t>
    302302</section>
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.