Changeset 829 for draft-ietf-httpbis

Timestamp:

Jun 25, 2010, 6:01:53 AM (9 years ago)

Author:

julian.reschke@…

Message:

add fwd reference to If-Range header field definition

Location:

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest

Files:

• p5-range.html (modified) (10 diffs)
• p5-range.xml (modified) (1 diff)

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p5-range.html

@@ -400 +400 @@
       <meta name="dct.creator" content="Reschke, J. F.">
       <meta name="dct.identifier" content="urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest">
-      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2010-06-02">
+      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2010-06-25">
       <meta name="dct.replaces" content="urn:ietf:rfc:2616">
       <meta name="dct.abstract" content="The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information systems. HTTP has been in use by the World Wide Web global information initiative since 1990. This document is Part 5 of the seven-part specification that defines the protocol referred to as &#34;HTTP/1.1&#34; and, taken together, obsoletes RFC 2616. Part 5 defines range-specific requests and the rules for constructing and combining responses to those requests.">
@@ -426 +426 @@
             </tr>
             <tr>
-               <td class="left">Expires: December 4, 2010</td>
+               <td class="left">Expires: December 27, 2010</td>
                <td class="right">J. Mogul</td>
             </tr>
@@ -483 +483 @@
             <tr>
                <td class="left"></td>
-               <td class="right">June 2, 2010</td>
+               <td class="right">June 25, 2010</td>
             </tr>
          </tbody>
@@ -509 +509 @@
          in progress”.
       </p>
-      <p>This Internet-Draft will expire in December 4, 2010.</p>
+      <p>This Internet-Draft will expire in December 27, 2010.</p>
       <h1><a id="rfc.copyrightnotice" href="#rfc.copyrightnotice">Copyright Notice</a></h1>
       <p>Copyright © 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.</p>
@@ -669 +669 @@
       <h2 id="rfc.section.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2">3.2</a>&nbsp;<a id="status.416" href="#status.416">416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable</a></h2>
       <p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.1">A server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> return a response with this status code if a request included a Range request-header field (<a href="#header.range" id="rfc.xref.header.range.4" title="Range">Section&nbsp;5.4</a>), and none of the ranges-specifier values in this field overlap the current extent of the selected resource, and the request
-         did not include an If-Range request-header field. (For byte-ranges, this means that the first-byte-pos of all of the byte-range-spec
-         values were greater than the current length of the selected resource.)
+         did not include an If-Range request-header field (<a href="#header.if-range" id="rfc.xref.header.if-range.2" title="If-Range">Section&nbsp;5.3</a>). (For byte-ranges, this means that the first-byte-pos of all of the byte-range-spec values were greater than the current
+         length of the selected resource.)
       </p>
       <p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.2">When this status code is returned for a byte-range request, the response <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> include a Content-Range entity-header field specifying the current length of the selected resource (see <a href="#header.content-range" id="rfc.xref.header.content-range.3" title="Content-Range">Section&nbsp;5.2</a>). This response <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> use the multipart/byteranges content-type.
@@ -890 +890 @@
          </li>
       </ul>
-      <p id="rfc.section.5.4.2.p.5">In some cases, it might be more appropriate to use the If-Range header (see <a href="#header.if-range" id="rfc.xref.header.if-range.2" title="If-Range">Section&nbsp;5.3</a>) in addition to the Range header.
+      <p id="rfc.section.5.4.2.p.5">In some cases, it might be more appropriate to use the If-Range header (see <a href="#header.if-range" id="rfc.xref.header.if-range.3" title="If-Range">Section&nbsp;5.3</a>) in addition to the Range header.
       </p>
       <p id="rfc.section.5.4.2.p.6">If a proxy that supports ranges receives a Range request, forwards the request to an inbound server, and receives an entire
@@ -958 +958 @@
                   <td class="left">http</td>
                   <td class="left">standard</td>
-                  <td class="left"> <a href="#header.if-range" id="rfc.xref.header.if-range.3" title="If-Range">Section&nbsp;5.3</a> 
+                  <td class="left"> <a href="#header.if-range" id="rfc.xref.header.if-range.4" title="If-Range">Section&nbsp;5.3</a> 
                   </td>
                </tr>
@@ -1164 +1164 @@
       </p>
       <p id="rfc.section.B.1.p.3">Range request responses would become very verbose if all meta-data were always returned; by allowing the server to only send
-         needed headers in a 206 response, this problem can be avoided. (Section <a href="#status.206" id="rfc.xref.status.206.2" title="206 Partial Content">3.1</a> and <a href="#header.if-range" id="rfc.xref.header.if-range.4" title="If-Range">5.3</a>)
+         needed headers in a 206 response, this problem can be avoided. (Section <a href="#status.206" id="rfc.xref.status.206.2" title="206 Partial Content">3.1</a> and <a href="#header.if-range" id="rfc.xref.header.if-range.5" title="If-Range">5.3</a>)
       </p>
       <p id="rfc.section.B.1.p.4">Fix problem with unsatisfiable range requests; there are two cases: syntactic problems, and range doesn't exist in the document.
@@ -1374 +1374 @@
                         <li class="indline1">Accept-Ranges&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.1"><b>5.1</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.accept-ranges.1">6.2</a></li>
                         <li class="indline1">Content-Range&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-range.1">2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-range.2">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-range.3">3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.2"><b>5.2</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-range.4">6.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-range.5">B.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-range.6">B.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.content-range.7">B.1</a></li>
-                        <li class="indline1">If-Range&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.3"><b>5.3</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.2">5.4.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.3">6.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.4">B.1</a></li>
+                        <li class="indline1">If-Range&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.2">3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.3"><b>5.3</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.3">5.4.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.4">6.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.5">B.1</a></li>
                         <li class="indline1">Range&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.range.1">2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.range.2">2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.range.3">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.range.4">3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.h.4"><b>5.4</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.range.5">6.2</a></li>
                      </ul>
@@ -1381 +1381 @@
             </li>
             <li class="indline0"><a id="rfc.index.I" href="#rfc.index.I"><b>I</b></a><ul class="ind">
-                  <li class="indline1">If-Range header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.i.1"><b>5.3</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.2">5.4.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.3">6.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.4">B.1</a></li>
+                  <li class="indline1">If-Range header&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.1">3.1</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.2">3.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.iref.i.1"><b>5.3</b></a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.3">5.4.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.4">6.2</a>, <a class="iref" href="#rfc.xref.header.if-range.5">B.1</a></li>
                </ul>
             </li>

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p5-range.xml

@@ -401 +401 @@
    the ranges-specifier values in this field overlap the current extent
    of the selected resource, and the request did not include an If-Range
-   request-header field. (For byte-ranges, this means that the first-byte-pos
-   of all of the byte-range-spec values were greater than the
-   current length of the selected resource.)
+   request-header field (<xref target="header.if-range"/>). (For byte-ranges,
+   this means that the first-byte-pos of all of the byte-range-spec values were
+   greater than the current length of the selected resource.)
 </t>
 <t>