Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 30, 2009, 4:29:42 AM (11 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

expand header canon. issue and link to newly raised issue

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p6-cache.xml

    r562 r567  
    797797  <cref>[ref]</cref> at places where this is allowed by the corresponding ABNF, and/or
    798798  combining multiple message-header fields with the same field name following the rules
    799   about message headers in &message-headers;. <cref>DISCUSS: header-specific canonicalisation</cref>
     799  about message headers in &message-headers;. <cref anchor="DISCUSS-header-specific-canonicalization">
     800  Should the matching requirement be relaxed so that it would be ok to use a cached response
     801  if the selecting request headers match after header-specific canonicalization?
     802  (see <eref target="http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/147">Issue 147</eref>)
     803  </cref>
    800804</t>
    801805<t>
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.