Changeset 280 for draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p2-semantics.html

Timestamp:

Jul 14, 2008, 5:18:10 AM (12 years ago)

Author:

julian.reschke@…

Message:

Resolve #98: remove superfluous statement about request body handling for OPTIONS (closes #98).

File:

• draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p2-semantics.html (modified) (3 diffs)

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p2-semantics.html

@@ -477 +477 @@
          <tr>
             <td class="header left"></td>
-            <td class="header right">July 7, 2008</td>
+            <td class="header right">July 14, 2008</td>
          </tr>
       </table>
@@ -900 +900 @@
       <p id="rfc.section.8.2.p.3">If the OPTIONS request includes an entity-body (as indicated by the presence of Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding), then
          the media type <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be indicated by a Content-Type field. Although this specification does not define any use for such a body, future extensions
-         to HTTP might use the OPTIONS body to make more detailed queries on the server. A server that does not support such an extension <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> discard the request body.
+         to HTTP might use the OPTIONS body to make more detailed queries on the server.
       </p>
       <p id="rfc.section.8.2.p.4">If the Request-URI is an asterisk ("*"), the OPTIONS request is intended to apply to the server in general rather than to
@@ -2274 +2274 @@
       <p id="rfc.section.B.5.p.1">Closed issues: </p>
       <ul>
+         <li> &lt;<a href="http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/98">http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/98</a>&gt;: "OPTIONS request bodies"
+         </li>
          <li> &lt;<a href="http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/119">http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/119</a>&gt;: "Description of CONNECT should refer to RFC2817"
          </li>