Changeset 2726 for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2/00
- Timestamp:
- 14/06/14 11:20:37 (9 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
draft-ietf-httpbis-http2/00/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2.html
r2011 r2726 2 2 PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"> 3 3 <html lang="en"> 4 <head profile="http:// www.w3.org/2006/03/hcard http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/08/04/dc-html/">4 <head profile="http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/08/04/dc-html/"> 5 5 <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> 6 6 <title>SPDY Protocol</title><script> 7 7 var buttonsAdded = false; 8 8 9 function init () {9 function initFeedback() { 10 10 var fb = document.createElement("div"); 11 11 fb.className = "feedback noprint"; … … 22 22 toggleButtonsToElementsByName("h3"); 23 23 toggleButtonsToElementsByName("h4"); 24 24 25 25 buttonsAdded = !buttonsAdded; 26 26 } … … 35 35 function toggleButton(node) { 36 36 if (! buttonsAdded) { 37 37 38 38 // docname 39 39 var template = "mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org?subject={docname},%20%22{section}%22&body=<{ref}>:"; … … 58 58 ref += "#" + id; 59 59 } 60 60 61 61 // docname 62 62 var docname = "draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-00"; … … 65 65 var section = node.textContent; 66 66 section = section.replace("\u00a0", " "); 67 67 68 68 // build URI from template 69 69 var uri = template.replace("{docname}", encodeURIComponent(docname)); 70 70 uri = uri.replace("{section}", encodeURIComponent(section)); 71 71 uri = uri.replace("{ref}", encodeURIComponent(ref)); 72 72 73 73 var button = document.createElement("a"); 74 74 button.className = "fbbutton noprint"; … … 106 106 body { 107 107 color: black; 108 font-family: verdana, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;109 font-size: 1 0pt;108 font-family: cambria, helvetica, arial, sans-serif; 109 font-size: 11pt; 110 110 margin-right: 2em; 111 111 } … … 129 129 } 130 130 h1 { 131 font-size: 1 4pt;131 font-size: 130%; 132 132 line-height: 21pt; 133 133 page-break-after: avoid; … … 136 136 page-break-before: always; 137 137 } 138 h1 a {139 color: #333333;140 }141 138 h2 { 142 font-size: 12 pt;139 font-size: 120%; 143 140 line-height: 15pt; 144 141 page-break-after: avoid; 145 142 } 146 h3 , h4, h5, h6{147 font-size: 1 0pt;143 h3 { 144 font-size: 110%; 148 145 page-break-after: avoid; 149 146 } 150 h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a, h6 a { 147 h4, h5, h6 { 148 page-break-after: avoid; 149 } 150 h1 a, h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a, h6 a { 151 151 color: black; 152 152 } … … 178 178 page-break-inside: avoid; 179 179 } 180 pre.ccmarker {181 background-color: white;182 color: gray;183 }184 pre.ccmarker > span {185 font-size: small;186 }187 pre.cct {188 margin-bottom: -1em;189 }190 pre.ccb {191 margin-top: -1em;192 }193 180 pre.text2 { 194 181 border-style: dotted; … … 219 206 border-spacing: 1px; 220 207 width: 95%; 221 font-size: 1 0pt;208 font-size: 11pt; 222 209 color: white; 223 210 } … … 227 214 td.topnowrap { 228 215 vertical-align: top; 229 white-space: nowrap; 216 white-space: nowrap; 230 217 } 231 218 table.header td { … … 249 236 line-height: 150%; 250 237 font-weight: bold; 251 font-size: 10pt;252 238 margin-left: 0em; 253 239 } … … 255 241 line-height: normal; 256 242 font-weight: normal; 257 font-size: 9pt;243 font-size: 10pt; 258 244 margin-left: 0em; 259 245 } … … 263 249 ul p { 264 250 margin-left: 0em; 251 } 252 .title, .filename, h1, h2, h3, h4 { 253 font-family: candara, helvetica, arial, sans-serif; 254 } 255 samp, tt, code, pre { 256 font: consolas, monospace; 265 257 } 266 258 ul.ind, ul.ind ul { … … 298 290 font-weight: bold; 299 291 text-align: center; 300 font-size: 9pt;292 font-size: 10pt; 301 293 } 302 294 .filename { 303 295 color: #333333; 296 font-size: 75%; 304 297 font-weight: bold; 305 font-size: 12pt;306 298 line-height: 21pt; 307 299 text-align: center; … … 310 302 font-weight: bold; 311 303 } 312 .hidden {313 display: none;314 }315 304 .left { 316 305 text-align: left; … … 320 309 } 321 310 .title { 322 color: #990000;323 font-size: 1 8pt;311 color: green; 312 font-size: 150%; 324 313 line-height: 18pt; 325 314 font-weight: bold; … … 327 316 margin-top: 36pt; 328 317 } 329 .vcardline {330 display: block;331 }332 318 .warning { 333 font-size: 1 4pt;319 font-size: 130%; 334 320 background-color: yellow; 335 321 } … … 359 345 display: none; 360 346 } 361 347 362 348 a { 363 349 color: black; … … 374 360 background-color: white; 375 361 vertical-align: top; 376 font-size: 1 2pt;362 font-size: 110%; 377 363 } 378 364 … … 380 366 content: leader('.') target-counter(attr(href), page); 381 367 } 382 368 383 369 ul.ind li li a { 384 370 content: target-counter(attr(href), page); 385 371 } 386 372 387 373 .print2col { 388 374 column-count: 2; … … 394 380 @page { 395 381 @top-left { 396 content: "Internet-Draft"; 397 } 382 content: "Internet-Draft"; 383 } 398 384 @top-right { 399 content: "November 2012"; 400 } 385 content: "November 2012"; 386 } 401 387 @top-center { 402 content: "SPDY"; 403 } 388 content: "SPDY"; 389 } 404 390 @bottom-left { 405 content: "Belshe, et al."; 406 } 391 content: "Belshe, et al."; 392 } 407 393 @bottom-center { 408 content: "Expires June 1, 2013"; 409 } 394 content: "Expires June 1, 2013"; 395 } 410 396 @bottom-right { 411 content: "[Page " counter(page) "]"; 412 } 413 } 414 415 @page:first { 397 content: "[Page " counter(page) "]"; 398 } 399 } 400 401 @page:first { 416 402 @top-left { 417 403 content: normal; … … 439 425 <link rel="Chapter" href="#rfc.section.10" title="10 Normative References"> 440 426 <link rel="Appendix" title="A Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)" href="#rfc.section.A"> 441 <meta name="generator" content="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629.xslt, Revision 1. 588, 2012-08-25 12:28:24, XSLT vendor: SAXON 8.9 from Saxonica http://www.saxonica.com/">427 <meta name="generator" content="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629.xslt, Revision 1.640, 2014/06/13 12:42:58, XSLT vendor: SAXON 8.9 from Saxonica http://www.saxonica.com/"> 442 428 <meta name="keywords" content="HTTP"> 443 429 <link rel="schema.dct" href="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"> … … 451 437 <meta name="description" content="This document describes SPDY, a protocol designed for low-latency transport of content over the World Wide Web. SPDY introduces two layers of protocol. The lower layer is a general purpose framing layer which can be used atop a reliable transport (likely TCP) for multiplexed, prioritized, and compressed data communication of many concurrent streams. The upper layer of the protocol provides HTTP-like RFC2616 semantics for compatibility with existing HTTP application servers."> 452 438 </head> 453 <body onload="init ();">439 <body onload="initFeedback();"> 454 440 <table class="header"> 455 441 <tbody> … … 493 479 </table> 494 480 <p class="title">SPDY Protocol<br><span class="filename">draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-00</span></p> 495 <h1 id="rfc.abstract"><a href="#rfc.abstract">Abstract</a></h1> 481 <h1 id="rfc.abstract"><a href="#rfc.abstract">Abstract</a></h1> 496 482 <p>This document describes SPDY, a protocol designed for low-latency transport of content over the World Wide Web. SPDY introduces 497 483 two layers of protocol. The lower layer is a general purpose framing layer which can be used atop a reliable transport (likely 498 484 TCP) for multiplexed, prioritized, and compressed data communication of many concurrent streams. The upper layer of the protocol 499 485 provides HTTP-like <a href="#RFC2616">RFC2616</a> <cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">[RFC2616]</cite> semantics for compatibility with existing HTTP application servers. 500 </p> 501 <h1 id="rfc.note.1"><a href="#rfc.note.1">Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)</a></h1> 502 <p>This draft is a work-in-progress, and does not yet reflect Working Group consensus.</p> 486 </p> 487 <h1 id="rfc.note.1"><a href="#rfc.note.1">Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)</a></h1> 488 <p>This draft is a work-in-progress, and does not yet reflect Working Group consensus.</p> 503 489 <p>This first draft uses the SPDY Protocol as a starting point, as per the Working Group's charter. Future drafts will add, remove 504 490 and change text, based upon the Working Group's decisions. 505 </p> 491 </p> 506 492 <p>Discussion of this draft takes place on the HTTPBIS working group mailing list (ietf-http-wg@w3.org), which is archived at <<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/</a>>. 507 </p> 493 </p> 508 494 <p>The current issues list is at <<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/21">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/21</a>> and related documents (including fancy diffs) can be found at <<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/</a>>. 509 </p> 495 </p> 510 496 <p>The changes in this draft are summarized in <a href="#changes.since.draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00" title="Since draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00">Appendix A.1</a>. 511 </p>512 <h1><a id="rfc.status" href="#rfc.status">Status of This Memo</a></h1>513 <p>This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.</p>514 <p>Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute515 working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at <a href="http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/">http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/</a>.516 497 </p> 517 <p>Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other 518 documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work 519 in progress”. 520 </p> 521 <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on June 1, 2013.</p> 522 <h1><a id="rfc.copyrightnotice" href="#rfc.copyrightnotice">Copyright Notice</a></h1> 523 <p>Copyright © 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.</p> 524 <p>This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (<a href="http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info">http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info</a>) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights 525 and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License 526 text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified 527 BSD License. 528 </p> 498 <div id="rfc.status"> 499 <h1><a href="#rfc.status">Status of This Memo</a></h1> 500 <p>This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.</p> 501 <p>Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute 502 working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at <a href="http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/">http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/</a>. 503 </p> 504 <p>Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other 505 documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work 506 in progress”. 507 </p> 508 <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on June 1, 2013.</p> 509 </div> 510 <div id="rfc.copyrightnotice"> 511 <h1><a href="#rfc.copyrightnotice">Copyright Notice</a></h1> 512 <p>Copyright © 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.</p> 513 <p>This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (<a href="http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info">http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info</a>) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights 514 and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License 515 text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified 516 BSD License. 517 </p> 518 </div> 529 519 <hr class="noprint"> 530 520 <h1 class="np" id="rfc.toc"><a href="#rfc.toc">Table of Contents</a></h1> … … 544 534 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3">2.3</a> <a href="#rfc.section.2.3">Streams</a><ul> 545 535 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.1">2.3.1</a> <a href="#StreamFrames">Stream frames</a></li> 546 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2">2.3.2</a> <a href="#StreamCreation">Stream creation</a><ul> 547 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2.1">2.3.2.1</a> <a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2.1">Unidirectional streams</a></li> 548 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2.2">2.3.2.2</a> <a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2.2">Bidirectional streams</a></li> 549 </ul> 550 </li> 536 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2">2.3.2</a> <a href="#StreamCreation">Stream creation</a></li> 551 537 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.3">2.3.3</a> <a href="#StreamPriority">Stream priority</a></li> 552 538 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.4">2.3.4</a> <a href="#rfc.section.2.3.4">Stream headers</a></li> … … 572 558 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.8">2.6.8</a> <a href="#WINDOW_UPDATE">WINDOW_UPDATE</a></li> 573 559 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.9">2.6.9</a> <a href="#CREDENTIAL">CREDENTIAL</a></li> 574 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.10">2.6.10</a> <a href="#HeaderBlock">Name/Value Header Block</a><ul> 575 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.10.1">2.6.10.1</a> <a href="#Compression">Compression</a></li> 576 </ul> 577 </li> 560 <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.10">2.6.10</a> <a href="#HeaderBlock">Name/Value Header Block</a></li> 578 561 </ul> 579 562 </li> … … 588 571 <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.1">3.2.1</a> <a href="#rfc.section.3.2.1">Request</a></li> 589 572 <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.2">3.2.2</a> <a href="#rfc.section.3.2.2">Response</a></li> 590 <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3">3.2.3</a> <a href="#Authentication">Authentication</a><ul> 591 <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3.1">3.2.3.1</a> <a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3.1">Stateless Authentication</a></li> 592 <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3.2">3.2.3.2</a> <a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3.2">Stateful Authentication</a></li> 593 </ul> 594 </li> 573 <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3">3.2.3</a> <a href="#Authentication">Authentication</a></li> 595 574 </ul> 596 575 </li> … … 629 608 <li><a href="#rfc.section.9">9.</a> <a href="#rfc.section.9">Acknowledgements</a></li> 630 609 <li><a href="#rfc.section.10">10.</a> <a href="#rfc.references">Normative References</a></li> 631 <li><a href="#rfc.authors">Authors' Addresses</a></li>632 610 <li><a href="#rfc.section.A">A.</a> <a href="#change.log">Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)</a><ul> 633 611 <li><a href="#rfc.section.A.1">A.1</a> <a href="#changes.since.draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00">Since draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00</a></li> … … 635 613 </li> 636 614 <li><a href="#rfc.index">Index</a></li> 615 <li><a href="#rfc.authors">Authors' Addresses</a></li> 637 616 </ul> 638 <h1 id="rfc.section.1" class="np"><a href="#rfc.section.1">1.</a> <a id="intro" href="#intro">Overview</a></h1> 639 <p id="rfc.section.1.p.1">One of the bottlenecks of HTTP implementations is that HTTP relies on multiple connections for concurrency. This causes several 640 problems, including additional round trips for connection setup, slow-start delays, and connection rationing by the client, 641 where it tries to avoid opening too many connections to any single server. HTTP pipelining helps some, but only achieves partial 642 multiplexing. In addition, pipelining has proven non-deployable in existing browsers due to intermediary interference. 643 </p> 644 <p id="rfc.section.1.p.2">SPDY adds a framing layer for multiplexing multiple, concurrent streams across a single TCP connection (or any reliable transport 645 stream). The framing layer is optimized for HTTP-like request-response streams, such that applications which run over HTTP 646 today can work over SPDY with little or no change on behalf of the web application writer. 647 </p> 648 <p id="rfc.section.1.p.3">The SPDY session offers four improvements over HTTP: </p> 649 <ul class="empty"> 650 <li>Multiplexed requests: There is no limit to the number of requests that can be issued concurrently over a single SPDY connection.</li> 651 <li>Prioritized requests: Clients can request certain resources to be delivered first. This avoids the problem of congesting the 652 network channel with non-critical resources when a high-priority request is pending. 653 </li> 654 <li>Compressed headers: Clients today send a significant amount of redundant data in the form of HTTP headers. Because a single 655 web page may require 50 or 100 subrequests, this data is significant. 656 </li> 657 <li>Server pushed streams: Server Push enables content to be pushed from servers to clients without a request.</li> 658 </ul> 659 <p id="rfc.section.1.p.4">SPDY attempts to preserve the existing semantics of HTTP. All features such as cookies, ETags, Vary headers, Content-Encoding 660 negotiations, etc work as they do with HTTP; SPDY only replaces the way the data is written to the network. 661 </p> 662 <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a> Document Organization 663 </h2> 664 <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">The SPDY Specification is split into two parts: a framing layer (<a href="#FramingLayer" title="SPDY Framing Layer">Section 2</a>), which multiplexes a TCP connection into independent, length-prefixed frames, and an HTTP layer (<a href="#HTTPLayer" title="HTTP Layering over SPDY">Section 3</a>), which specifies the mechanism for overlaying HTTP request/response pairs on top of the framing layer. While some of the 665 framing layer concepts are isolated from the HTTP layer, building a generic framing layer has not been a goal. The framing 666 layer is tailored to the needs of the HTTP protocol and server push. 667 </p> 668 <h2 id="rfc.section.1.2"><a href="#rfc.section.1.2">1.2</a> Definitions 669 </h2> 670 <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.1"> </p> 671 <ul class="empty"> 672 <li>client: The endpoint initiating the SPDY session.</li> 673 <li>connection: A transport-level connection between two endpoints.</li> 674 <li>endpoint: Either the client or server of a connection.</li> 675 <li>frame: A header-prefixed sequence of bytes sent over a SPDY session.</li> 676 <li>server: The endpoint which did not initiate the SPDY session.</li> 677 <li>session: A synonym for a connection.</li> 678 <li>session error: An error on the SPDY session.</li> 679 <li>stream: A bi-directional flow of bytes across a virtual channel within a SPDY session.</li> 680 <li>stream error: An error on an individual SPDY stream.</li> 681 </ul> 682 <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a> <a id="FramingLayer" href="#FramingLayer">SPDY Framing Layer</a></h1> 683 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.1">2.1</a> Session (Connections) 684 </h2> 685 <p id="rfc.section.2.1.p.1">The SPDY framing layer (or "session") runs atop a reliable transport layer such as <a href="#RFC0793">TCP</a> <cite title="Transmission Control Protocol" id="rfc.xref.RFC0793.1">[RFC0793]</cite>. The client is the TCP connection initiator. SPDY connections are persistent connections. 686 </p> 687 <p id="rfc.section.2.1.p.2">For best performance, it is expected that clients will not close open connections until the user navigates away from all web 688 pages referencing a connection, or until the server closes the connection. Servers are encouraged to leave connections open 689 for as long as possible, but can terminate idle connections if necessary. When either endpoint closes the transport-level 690 connection, it MUST first send a GOAWAY (<a href="#GOAWAY" title="GOAWAY">Section 2.6.6</a>) frame so that the endpoints can reliably determine if requests finished before the close. 691 </p> 692 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.2">2.2</a> Framing 693 </h2> 694 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.p.1">Once the connection is established, clients and servers exchange framed messages. There are two types of frames: control frames (<a href="#ControlFrames" title="Control frames">Section 2.2.1</a>) and data frames (<a href="#DataFrames" title="Data frames">Section 2.2.2</a>). Frames always have a common header which is 8 bytes in length. 695 </p> 696 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.p.2">The first bit is a control bit indicating whether a frame is a control frame or data frame. Control frames carry a version 697 number, a frame type, flags, and a length. Data frames contain the stream ID, flags, and the length for the payload carried 698 after the common header. The simple header is designed to make reading and writing of frames easy. 699 </p> 700 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.p.3">All integer values, including length, version, and type, are in network byte order. SPDY does not enforce alignment of types 701 in dynamically sized frames. 702 </p> 703 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.2.1">2.2.1</a> <a id="ControlFrames" href="#ControlFrames">Control frames</a></h3> 704 <div id="rfc.figure.u.1"></div> <pre>+----------------------------------+ 617 <div id="intro"> 618 <h1 id="rfc.section.1" class="np"><a href="#rfc.section.1">1.</a> <a href="#intro">Overview</a></h1> 619 <p id="rfc.section.1.p.1">One of the bottlenecks of HTTP implementations is that HTTP relies on multiple connections for concurrency. This causes several 620 problems, including additional round trips for connection setup, slow-start delays, and connection rationing by the client, 621 where it tries to avoid opening too many connections to any single server. HTTP pipelining helps some, but only achieves partial 622 multiplexing. In addition, pipelining has proven non-deployable in existing browsers due to intermediary interference. 623 </p> 624 <p id="rfc.section.1.p.2">SPDY adds a framing layer for multiplexing multiple, concurrent streams across a single TCP connection (or any reliable transport 625 stream). The framing layer is optimized for HTTP-like request-response streams, such that applications which run over HTTP 626 today can work over SPDY with little or no change on behalf of the web application writer. 627 </p> 628 <p id="rfc.section.1.p.3">The SPDY session offers four improvements over HTTP: </p> 629 <ul class="empty"> 630 <li>Multiplexed requests: There is no limit to the number of requests that can be issued concurrently over a single SPDY connection.</li> 631 <li>Prioritized requests: Clients can request certain resources to be delivered first. This avoids the problem of congesting the 632 network channel with non-critical resources when a high-priority request is pending. 633 </li> 634 <li>Compressed headers: Clients today send a significant amount of redundant data in the form of HTTP headers. Because a single 635 web page may require 50 or 100 subrequests, this data is significant. 636 </li> 637 <li>Server pushed streams: Server Push enables content to be pushed from servers to clients without a request.</li> 638 </ul> 639 <p id="rfc.section.1.p.4">SPDY attempts to preserve the existing semantics of HTTP. All features such as cookies, ETags, Vary headers, Content-Encoding 640 negotiations, etc work as they do with HTTP; SPDY only replaces the way the data is written to the network. 641 </p> 642 <div> 643 <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a> Document Organization 644 </h2> 645 <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">The SPDY Specification is split into two parts: a framing layer (<a href="#FramingLayer" title="SPDY Framing Layer">Section 2</a>), which multiplexes a TCP connection into independent, length-prefixed frames, and an HTTP layer (<a href="#HTTPLayer" title="HTTP Layering over SPDY">Section 3</a>), which specifies the mechanism for overlaying HTTP request/response pairs on top of the framing layer. While some of the 646 framing layer concepts are isolated from the HTTP layer, building a generic framing layer has not been a goal. The framing 647 layer is tailored to the needs of the HTTP protocol and server push. 648 </p> 649 </div> 650 <div> 651 <h2 id="rfc.section.1.2"><a href="#rfc.section.1.2">1.2</a> Definitions 652 </h2> 653 <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.1"></p> 654 <ul class="empty"> 655 <li>client: The endpoint initiating the SPDY session.</li> 656 <li>connection: A transport-level connection between two endpoints.</li> 657 <li>endpoint: Either the client or server of a connection.</li> 658 <li>frame: A header-prefixed sequence of bytes sent over a SPDY session.</li> 659 <li>server: The endpoint which did not initiate the SPDY session.</li> 660 <li>session: A synonym for a connection.</li> 661 <li>session error: An error on the SPDY session.</li> 662 <li>stream: A bi-directional flow of bytes across a virtual channel within a SPDY session.</li> 663 <li>stream error: An error on an individual SPDY stream.</li> 664 </ul> 665 </div> 666 </div> 667 <div id="FramingLayer"> 668 <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a> <a href="#FramingLayer">SPDY Framing Layer</a></h1> 669 <div> 670 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.1">2.1</a> Session (Connections) 671 </h2> 672 <p id="rfc.section.2.1.p.1">The SPDY framing layer (or "session") runs atop a reliable transport layer such as <a href="#RFC0793">TCP</a> <cite title="Transmission Control Protocol" id="rfc.xref.RFC0793.1">[RFC0793]</cite>. The client is the TCP connection initiator. SPDY connections are persistent connections. 673 </p> 674 <p id="rfc.section.2.1.p.2">For best performance, it is expected that clients will not close open connections until the user navigates away from all web 675 pages referencing a connection, or until the server closes the connection. Servers are encouraged to leave connections open 676 for as long as possible, but can terminate idle connections if necessary. When either endpoint closes the transport-level 677 connection, it MUST first send a GOAWAY (<a href="#GOAWAY" title="GOAWAY">Section 2.6.6</a>) frame so that the endpoints can reliably determine if requests finished before the close. 678 </p> 679 </div> 680 <div> 681 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.2">2.2</a> Framing 682 </h2> 683 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.p.1">Once the connection is established, clients and servers exchange framed messages. There are two types of frames: control frames (<a href="#ControlFrames" title="Control frames">Section 2.2.1</a>) and data frames (<a href="#DataFrames" title="Data frames">Section 2.2.2</a>). Frames always have a common header which is 8 bytes in length. 684 </p> 685 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.p.2">The first bit is a control bit indicating whether a frame is a control frame or data frame. Control frames carry a version 686 number, a frame type, flags, and a length. Data frames contain the stream ID, flags, and the length for the payload carried 687 after the common header. The simple header is designed to make reading and writing of frames easy. 688 </p> 689 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.p.3">All integer values, including length, version, and type, are in network byte order. SPDY does not enforce alignment of types 690 in dynamically sized frames. 691 </p> 692 <div id="ControlFrames"> 693 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.2.1">2.2.1</a> <a href="#ControlFrames">Control frames</a></h3> 694 <div id="rfc.figure.u.1"></div><pre>+----------------------------------+ 705 695 |C| Version(15bits) | Type(16bits) | 706 696 +----------------------------------+ … … 709 699 | Data | 710 700 +----------------------------------+ 711 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.2">Control bit: The 'C' bit is a single bit indicating if this is a control message. For control frames this value is always 712 1. 713 </p> 714 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.3">Version: The version number of the SPDY protocol. This document describes SPDY version 3.</p> 715 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.4">Type: The type of control frame. See Control Frames for the complete list of control frames.</p> 716 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.5">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Flags for control frames and data frames are different.</p> 717 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.6">Length: An unsigned 24-bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field.</p> 718 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.7">Data: data associated with this control frame. The format and length of this data is controlled by the control frame type.</p> 719 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.8">Control frame processing requirements: </p> 720 <ul class="empty"> 721 <li>Note that full length control frames (16MB) can be large for implementations running on resource-limited hardware. In such 722 cases, implementations MAY limit the maximum length frame supported. However, all implementations MUST be able to receive 723 control frames of at least 8192 octets in length. 724 </li> 725 </ul> 726 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.2.2">2.2.2</a> <a id="DataFrames" href="#DataFrames">Data frames</a></h3> 727 <div id="rfc.figure.u.2"></div> <pre>+----------------------------------+ 701 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.2">Control bit: The 'C' bit is a single bit indicating if this is a control message. For control frames this value is always 702 1. 703 </p> 704 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.3">Version: The version number of the SPDY protocol. This document describes SPDY version 3.</p> 705 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.4">Type: The type of control frame. See Control Frames for the complete list of control frames.</p> 706 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.5">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Flags for control frames and data frames are different.</p> 707 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.6">Length: An unsigned 24-bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field.</p> 708 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.7">Data: data associated with this control frame. The format and length of this data is controlled by the control frame type.</p> 709 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.8">Control frame processing requirements: </p> 710 <ul class="empty"> 711 <li>Note that full length control frames (16MB) can be large for implementations running on resource-limited hardware. In such 712 cases, implementations MAY limit the maximum length frame supported. However, all implementations MUST be able to receive 713 control frames of at least 8192 octets in length. 714 </li> 715 </ul> 716 </div> 717 <div id="DataFrames"> 718 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.2.2">2.2.2</a> <a href="#DataFrames">Data frames</a></h3> 719 <div id="rfc.figure.u.2"></div><pre>+----------------------------------+ 728 720 |C| Stream-ID (31bits) | 729 721 +----------------------------------+ … … 732 724 | Data | 733 725 +----------------------------------+ 734 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.2">Control bit: For data frames this value is always 0.</p> 735 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.3">Stream-ID: A 31-bit value identifying the stream.</p> 736 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.4">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Valid flags are: </p> 737 <ul class="empty"> 738 <li>0x01 = FLAG_FIN - signifies that this frame represents the last frame to be transmitted on this stream. See Stream Close (<a href="#StreamClose" title="Stream close">Section 2.3.7</a>) below. 739 </li> 740 <li>0x02 = FLAG_COMPRESS - indicates that the data in this frame has been compressed.</li> 741 </ul> 742 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.5">Length: An unsigned 24-bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field. The total size of a data frame is 743 8 bytes + length. It is valid to have a zero-length data frame. 744 </p> 745 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.6">Data: The variable-length data payload; the length was defined in the length field.</p> 746 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.7">Data frame processing requirements: </p> 747 <ul class="empty"> 748 <li>If an endpoint receives a data frame for a stream-id which is not open and the endpoint has not sent a GOAWAY (<a href="#GOAWAY" title="GOAWAY">Section 2.6.6</a>) frame, it MUST send issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the error code INVALID_STREAM for the stream-id. 749 </li> 750 <li>If the endpoint which created the stream receives a data frame before receiving a SYN_REPLY on that stream, it is a protocol 751 error, and the recipient MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR for the stream-id. 752 </li> 753 <li>Implementors note: If an endpoint receives multiple data frames for invalid stream-ids, it MAY close the session.</li> 754 <li>All SPDY endpoints MUST accept compressed data frames. Compression of data frames is always done using zlib compression. Each 755 stream initializes and uses its own compression context dedicated to use within that stream. Endpoints are encouraged to use 756 application level compression rather than SPDY stream level compression. 757 </li> 758 <li>Each SPDY stream sending compressed frames creates its own zlib context for that stream, and these compression contexts MUST 759 be distinct from the compression contexts used with SYN_STREAM/SYN_REPLY/HEADER compression. (Thus, if both endpoints of a 760 stream are compressing data on the stream, there will be two zlib contexts, one for sending and one for receiving). 761 </li> 762 </ul> 763 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.3"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3">2.3</a> Streams 764 </h2> 765 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.p.1">Streams are independent sequences of bi-directional data divided into frames with several properties: </p> 766 <ul class="empty"> 767 <li>Streams may be created by either the client or server.</li> 768 <li>Streams optionally carry a set of name/value header pairs.</li> 769 <li>Streams can concurrently send data interleaved with other streams.</li> 770 <li>Streams may be cancelled.</li> 771 </ul> 772 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.1">2.3.1</a> <a id="StreamFrames" href="#StreamFrames">Stream frames</a></h3> 773 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.1.p.1">SPDY defines 3 control frames to manage the lifecycle of a stream: </p> 774 <ul class="empty"> 775 <li>SYN_STREAM - Open a new stream</li> 776 <li>SYN_REPLY - Remote acknowledgement of a new, open stream</li> 777 <li>RST_STREAM - Close a stream</li> 778 </ul> 779 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2">2.3.2</a> <a id="StreamCreation" href="#StreamCreation">Stream creation</a></h3> 780 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.1">A stream is created by sending a control frame with the type set to SYN_STREAM (<a href="#SYN_STREAM" title="SYN_STREAM">Section 2.6.1</a>). If the server is initiating the stream, the Stream-ID must be even. If the client is initiating the stream, the Stream-ID 781 must be odd. 0 is not a valid Stream-ID. Stream-IDs from each side of the connection must increase monotonically as new streams 782 are created. E.g. Stream 2 may be created after stream 3, but stream 7 must not be created after stream 9. Stream IDs do not 783 wrap: when a client or server cannot create a new stream id without exceeding a 31 bit value, it MUST NOT create a new stream. 784 </p> 785 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.2">The stream-id MUST increase with each new stream. If an endpoint receives a SYN_STREAM with a stream id which is less than 786 any previously received SYN_STREAM, it MUST issue a session error (<a href="#SessionErrorHandler" title="Session Error Handling">Section 2.4.1</a>) with the status PROTOCOL_ERROR. 787 </p> 788 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.3">It is a protocol error to send two SYN_STREAMs with the same stream-id. If a recipient receives a second SYN_STREAM for the 789 same stream, it MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR. 790 </p> 791 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.4">Upon receipt of a SYN_STREAM, the recipient can reject the stream by sending a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the error code REFUSED_STREAM. Note, however, that the creating endpoint may have already sent additional frames for 792 that stream which cannot be immediately stopped. 793 </p> 794 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.5">Once the stream is created, the creator may immediately send HEADERS or DATA frames for that stream, without needing to wait 795 for the recipient to acknowledge. 796 </p> 797 <h4 id="rfc.section.2.3.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2.1">2.3.2.1</a> Unidirectional streams 798 </h4> 799 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.1.p.1">When an endpoint creates a stream with the FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL flag set, it creates a unidirectional stream which the creating 800 endpoint can use to send frames, but the receiving endpoint cannot. The receiving endpoint is implicitly already in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 801 </p> 802 <h4 id="rfc.section.2.3.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2.2">2.3.2.2</a> Bidirectional streams 803 </h4> 804 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.2.p.1">SYN_STREAM frames which do not use the FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL flag are bidirectional streams. Both endpoints can send data on 805 a bi-directional stream. 806 </p> 807 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.3"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.3">2.3.3</a> <a id="StreamPriority" href="#StreamPriority">Stream priority</a></h3> 808 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.3.p.1">The creator of a stream assigns a priority for that stream. Priority is represented as an integer from 0 to 7. 0 represents 809 the highest priority and 7 represents the lowest priority. 810 </p> 811 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.3.p.2">The sender and recipient SHOULD use best-effort to process streams in the order of highest priority to lowest priority.</p> 812 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.4"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.4">2.3.4</a> Stream headers 813 </h3> 814 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.4.p.1">Streams carry optional sets of name/value pair headers which carry metadata about the stream. After the stream has been created, 815 and as long as the sender is not closed (<a href="#StreamClose" title="Stream close">Section 2.3.7</a>) or half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>), each side may send HEADERS frame(s) containing the header data. Header data can be sent in multiple HEADERS frames, and 816 HEADERS frames may be interleaved with data frames. 817 </p> 818 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.5"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.5">2.3.5</a> Stream data exchange 819 </h3> 820 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.5.p.1">Once a stream is created, it can be used to send arbitrary amounts of data. Generally this means that a series of data frames 821 will be sent on the stream until a frame containing the FLAG_FIN flag is set. The FLAG_FIN can be set on a SYN_STREAM (<a href="#SYN_STREAM" title="SYN_STREAM">Section 2.6.1</a>), SYN_REPLY (<a href="#SYN_REPLY" title="SYN_REPLY">Section 2.6.2</a>), HEADERS (<a href="#HEADERS" title="HEADERS">Section 2.6.7</a>) or a DATA (<a href="#DataFrames" title="Data frames">Section 2.2.2</a>) frame. Once the FLAG_FIN has been sent, the stream is considered to be half-closed. 822 </p> 823 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.6"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.6">2.3.6</a> <a id="StreamHalfClose" href="#StreamHalfClose">Stream half-close</a></h3> 824 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.6.p.1">When one side of the stream sends a frame with the FLAG_FIN flag set, the stream is half-closed from that endpoint. The sender 825 of the FLAG_FIN MUST NOT send further frames on that stream. When both sides have half-closed, the stream is closed. 826 </p> 827 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.6.p.2">If an endpoint receives a data frame after the stream is half-closed from the sender (e.g. the endpoint has already received 828 a prior frame for the stream with the FIN flag set), it MUST send a RST_STREAM to the sender with the status STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED. 829 </p> 830 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.7"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.7">2.3.7</a> <a id="StreamClose" href="#StreamClose">Stream close</a></h3> 831 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.7.p.1">There are 3 ways that streams can be terminated: </p> 832 <ul class="empty"> 833 <li>Normal termination: Normal stream termination occurs when both sender and recipient have half-closed the stream by sending 834 a FLAG_FIN. 835 </li> 836 <li>Abrupt termination: Either the client or server can send a RST_STREAM control frame at any time. A RST_STREAM contains an 837 error code to indicate the reason for failure. When a RST_STREAM is sent from the stream originator, it indicates a failure 838 to complete the stream and that no further data will be sent on the stream. When a RST_STREAM is sent from the stream recipient, 839 the sender, upon receipt, should stop sending any data on the stream. The stream recipient should be aware that there is a 840 race between data already in transit from the sender and the time the RST_STREAM is received. See Stream Error Handling (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) 841 </li> 842 <li>TCP connection teardown: If the TCP connection is torn down while un-closed streams exist, then the endpoint must assume that 843 the stream was abnormally interrupted and may be incomplete. 844 </li> 845 </ul> 846 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.7.p.2">If an endpoint receives a data frame after the stream is closed, it must send a RST_STREAM to the sender with the status PROTOCOL_ERROR.</p> 847 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.4"><a href="#rfc.section.2.4">2.4</a> Error Handling 848 </h2> 849 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.p.1">The SPDY framing layer has only two types of errors, and they are always handled consistently. Any reference in this specification 850 to "issue a session error" refers to <a href="#SessionErrorHandler" title="Session Error Handling">Section 2.4.1</a>. Any reference to "issue a stream error" refers to <a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>. 851 </p> 852 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.4.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.4.1">2.4.1</a> <a id="SessionErrorHandler" href="#SessionErrorHandler">Session Error Handling</a></h3> 853 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.1.p.1">A session error is any error which prevents further processing of the framing layer or which corrupts the session compression 854 state. When a session error occurs, the endpoint encountering the error MUST first send a GOAWAY (<a href="#GOAWAY" title="GOAWAY">Section 2.6.6</a>) frame with the stream id of most recently received stream from the remote endpoint, and the error code for why the session 855 is terminating. After sending the GOAWAY frame, the endpoint MUST close the TCP connection. 856 </p> 857 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.1.p.2">Note that the session compression state is dependent upon both endpoints always processing all compressed data. If an endpoint 858 partially processes a frame containing compressed data without updating compression state properly, future control frames 859 which use compression will be always be errored. Implementations SHOULD always try to process compressed data so that errors 860 which could be handled as stream errors do not become session errors. 861 </p> 862 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.1.p.3">Note that because this GOAWAY is sent during a session error case, it is possible that the GOAWAY will not be reliably received 863 by the receiving endpoint. It is a best-effort attempt to communicate with the remote about why the session is going down. 864 </p> 865 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.4.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.4.2">2.4.2</a> <a id="StreamErrorHandler" href="#StreamErrorHandler">Stream Error Handling</a></h3> 866 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.2.p.1">A stream error is an error related to a specific stream-id which does not affect processing of other streams at the framing 867 layer. Upon a stream error, the endpoint MUST send a RST_STREAM (<a href="#RST_STREAM" title="RST_STREAM">Section 2.6.3</a>) frame which contains the stream id of the stream where the error occurred and the error status which caused the error. After 868 sending the RST_STREAM, the stream is closed to the sending endpoint. After sending the RST_STREAM, if the sender receives 869 any frames other than a RST_STREAM for that stream id, it will result in sending additional RST_STREAM frames. An endpoint 870 MUST NOT send a RST_STREAM in response to an RST_STREAM, as doing so would lead to RST_STREAM loops. Sending a RST_STREAM 871 does not cause the SPDY session to be closed. 872 </p> 873 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.2.p.2">If an endpoint has multiple RST_STREAM frames to send in succession for the same stream-id and the same error code, it MAY 874 coalesce them into a single RST_STREAM frame. (This can happen if a stream is closed, but the remote sends multiple data frames. 875 There is no reason to send a RST_STREAM for each frame in succession). 876 </p> 877 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.5"><a href="#rfc.section.2.5">2.5</a> Data flow 878 </h2> 879 <p id="rfc.section.2.5.p.1">Because TCP provides a single stream of data on which SPDY multiplexes multiple logical streams, clients and servers must 880 intelligently interleave data messages for concurrent sessions. 881 </p> 882 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.6"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6">2.6</a> Control frame types 883 </h2> 884 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.1">2.6.1</a> <a id="SYN_STREAM" href="#SYN_STREAM">SYN_STREAM</a></h3> 885 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.1">The SYN_STREAM control frame allows the sender to asynchronously create a stream between the endpoints. See Stream Creation (<a href="#StreamCreation" title="Stream creation">Section 2.3.2</a>) 886 </p> 887 <div id="rfc.figure.u.3"></div> <pre>+------------------------------------+ 726 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.2">Control bit: For data frames this value is always 0.</p> 727 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.3">Stream-ID: A 31-bit value identifying the stream.</p> 728 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.4">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Valid flags are: </p> 729 <ul class="empty"> 730 <li>0x01 = FLAG_FIN - signifies that this frame represents the last frame to be transmitted on this stream. See Stream Close (<a href="#StreamClose" title="Stream close">Section 2.3.7</a>) below. 731 </li> 732 <li>0x02 = FLAG_COMPRESS - indicates that the data in this frame has been compressed.</li> 733 </ul> 734 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.5">Length: An unsigned 24-bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field. The total size of a data frame is 735 8 bytes + length. It is valid to have a zero-length data frame. 736 </p> 737 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.6">Data: The variable-length data payload; the length was defined in the length field.</p> 738 <p id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.7">Data frame processing requirements: </p> 739 <ul class="empty"> 740 <li>If an endpoint receives a data frame for a stream-id which is not open and the endpoint has not sent a GOAWAY (<a href="#GOAWAY" title="GOAWAY">Section 2.6.6</a>) frame, it MUST send issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the error code INVALID_STREAM for the stream-id. 741 </li> 742 <li>If the endpoint which created the stream receives a data frame before receiving a SYN_REPLY on that stream, it is a protocol 743 error, and the recipient MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR for the stream-id. 744 </li> 745 <li>Implementors note: If an endpoint receives multiple data frames for invalid stream-ids, it MAY close the session.</li> 746 <li>All SPDY endpoints MUST accept compressed data frames. Compression of data frames is always done using zlib compression. Each 747 stream initializes and uses its own compression context dedicated to use within that stream. Endpoints are encouraged to use 748 application level compression rather than SPDY stream level compression. 749 </li> 750 <li>Each SPDY stream sending compressed frames creates its own zlib context for that stream, and these compression contexts MUST 751 be distinct from the compression contexts used with SYN_STREAM/SYN_REPLY/HEADER compression. (Thus, if both endpoints of a 752 stream are compressing data on the stream, there will be two zlib contexts, one for sending and one for receiving). 753 </li> 754 </ul> 755 </div> 756 </div> 757 <div> 758 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.3"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3">2.3</a> Streams 759 </h2> 760 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.p.1">Streams are independent sequences of bi-directional data divided into frames with several properties: </p> 761 <ul class="empty"> 762 <li>Streams may be created by either the client or server.</li> 763 <li>Streams optionally carry a set of name/value header pairs.</li> 764 <li>Streams can concurrently send data interleaved with other streams.</li> 765 <li>Streams may be cancelled.</li> 766 </ul> 767 <div id="StreamFrames"> 768 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.1">2.3.1</a> <a href="#StreamFrames">Stream frames</a></h3> 769 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.1.p.1">SPDY defines 3 control frames to manage the lifecycle of a stream: </p> 770 <ul class="empty"> 771 <li>SYN_STREAM - Open a new stream</li> 772 <li>SYN_REPLY - Remote acknowledgement of a new, open stream</li> 773 <li>RST_STREAM - Close a stream</li> 774 </ul> 775 </div> 776 <div id="StreamCreation"> 777 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2">2.3.2</a> <a href="#StreamCreation">Stream creation</a></h3> 778 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.1">A stream is created by sending a control frame with the type set to SYN_STREAM (<a href="#SYN_STREAM" title="SYN_STREAM">Section 2.6.1</a>). If the server is initiating the stream, the Stream-ID must be even. If the client is initiating the stream, the Stream-ID 779 must be odd. 0 is not a valid Stream-ID. Stream-IDs from each side of the connection must increase monotonically as new streams 780 are created. E.g. Stream 2 may be created after stream 3, but stream 7 must not be created after stream 9. Stream IDs do not 781 wrap: when a client or server cannot create a new stream id without exceeding a 31 bit value, it MUST NOT create a new stream. 782 </p> 783 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.2">The stream-id MUST increase with each new stream. If an endpoint receives a SYN_STREAM with a stream id which is less than 784 any previously received SYN_STREAM, it MUST issue a session error (<a href="#SessionErrorHandler" title="Session Error Handling">Section 2.4.1</a>) with the status PROTOCOL_ERROR. 785 </p> 786 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.3">It is a protocol error to send two SYN_STREAMs with the same stream-id. If a recipient receives a second SYN_STREAM for the 787 same stream, it MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR. 788 </p> 789 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.4">Upon receipt of a SYN_STREAM, the recipient can reject the stream by sending a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the error code REFUSED_STREAM. Note, however, that the creating endpoint may have already sent additional frames for 790 that stream which cannot be immediately stopped. 791 </p> 792 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.5">Once the stream is created, the creator may immediately send HEADERS or DATA frames for that stream, without needing to wait 793 for the recipient to acknowledge. 794 </p> 795 <div> 796 <h4 id="rfc.section.2.3.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2.1">2.3.2.1</a> Unidirectional streams 797 </h4> 798 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.1.p.1">When an endpoint creates a stream with the FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL flag set, it creates a unidirectional stream which the creating 799 endpoint can use to send frames, but the receiving endpoint cannot. The receiving endpoint is implicitly already in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 800 </p> 801 </div> 802 <div> 803 <h4 id="rfc.section.2.3.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2.2">2.3.2.2</a> Bidirectional streams 804 </h4> 805 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.2.2.p.1">SYN_STREAM frames which do not use the FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL flag are bidirectional streams. Both endpoints can send data on 806 a bi-directional stream. 807 </p> 808 </div> 809 </div> 810 <div id="StreamPriority"> 811 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.3"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.3">2.3.3</a> <a href="#StreamPriority">Stream priority</a></h3> 812 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.3.p.1">The creator of a stream assigns a priority for that stream. Priority is represented as an integer from 0 to 7. 0 represents 813 the highest priority and 7 represents the lowest priority. 814 </p> 815 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.3.p.2">The sender and recipient SHOULD use best-effort to process streams in the order of highest priority to lowest priority.</p> 816 </div> 817 <div> 818 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.4"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.4">2.3.4</a> Stream headers 819 </h3> 820 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.4.p.1">Streams carry optional sets of name/value pair headers which carry metadata about the stream. After the stream has been created, 821 and as long as the sender is not closed (<a href="#StreamClose" title="Stream close">Section 2.3.7</a>) or half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>), each side may send HEADERS frame(s) containing the header data. Header data can be sent in multiple HEADERS frames, and 822 HEADERS frames may be interleaved with data frames. 823 </p> 824 </div> 825 <div> 826 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.5"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.5">2.3.5</a> Stream data exchange 827 </h3> 828 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.5.p.1">Once a stream is created, it can be used to send arbitrary amounts of data. Generally this means that a series of data frames 829 will be sent on the stream until a frame containing the FLAG_FIN flag is set. The FLAG_FIN can be set on a SYN_STREAM (<a href="#SYN_STREAM" title="SYN_STREAM">Section 2.6.1</a>), SYN_REPLY (<a href="#SYN_REPLY" title="SYN_REPLY">Section 2.6.2</a>), HEADERS (<a href="#HEADERS" title="HEADERS">Section 2.6.7</a>) or a DATA (<a href="#DataFrames" title="Data frames">Section 2.2.2</a>) frame. Once the FLAG_FIN has been sent, the stream is considered to be half-closed. 830 </p> 831 </div> 832 <div id="StreamHalfClose"> 833 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.6"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.6">2.3.6</a> <a href="#StreamHalfClose">Stream half-close</a></h3> 834 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.6.p.1">When one side of the stream sends a frame with the FLAG_FIN flag set, the stream is half-closed from that endpoint. The sender 835 of the FLAG_FIN MUST NOT send further frames on that stream. When both sides have half-closed, the stream is closed. 836 </p> 837 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.6.p.2">If an endpoint receives a data frame after the stream is half-closed from the sender (e.g. the endpoint has already received 838 a prior frame for the stream with the FIN flag set), it MUST send a RST_STREAM to the sender with the status STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED. 839 </p> 840 </div> 841 <div id="StreamClose"> 842 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.7"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.7">2.3.7</a> <a href="#StreamClose">Stream close</a></h3> 843 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.7.p.1">There are 3 ways that streams can be terminated: </p> 844 <ul class="empty"> 845 <li>Normal termination: Normal stream termination occurs when both sender and recipient have half-closed the stream by sending 846 a FLAG_FIN. 847 </li> 848 <li>Abrupt termination: Either the client or server can send a RST_STREAM control frame at any time. A RST_STREAM contains an 849 error code to indicate the reason for failure. When a RST_STREAM is sent from the stream originator, it indicates a failure 850 to complete the stream and that no further data will be sent on the stream. When a RST_STREAM is sent from the stream recipient, 851 the sender, upon receipt, should stop sending any data on the stream. The stream recipient should be aware that there is a 852 race between data already in transit from the sender and the time the RST_STREAM is received. See Stream Error Handling (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) 853 </li> 854 <li>TCP connection teardown: If the TCP connection is torn down while un-closed streams exist, then the endpoint must assume that 855 the stream was abnormally interrupted and may be incomplete. 856 </li> 857 </ul> 858 <p id="rfc.section.2.3.7.p.2">If an endpoint receives a data frame after the stream is closed, it must send a RST_STREAM to the sender with the status PROTOCOL_ERROR.</p> 859 </div> 860 </div> 861 <div> 862 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.4"><a href="#rfc.section.2.4">2.4</a> Error Handling 863 </h2> 864 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.p.1">The SPDY framing layer has only two types of errors, and they are always handled consistently. Any reference in this specification 865 to "issue a session error" refers to <a href="#SessionErrorHandler" title="Session Error Handling">Section 2.4.1</a>. Any reference to "issue a stream error" refers to <a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>. 866 </p> 867 <div id="SessionErrorHandler"> 868 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.4.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.4.1">2.4.1</a> <a href="#SessionErrorHandler">Session Error Handling</a></h3> 869 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.1.p.1">A session error is any error which prevents further processing of the framing layer or which corrupts the session compression 870 state. When a session error occurs, the endpoint encountering the error MUST first send a GOAWAY (<a href="#GOAWAY" title="GOAWAY">Section 2.6.6</a>) frame with the stream id of most recently received stream from the remote endpoint, and the error code for why the session 871 is terminating. After sending the GOAWAY frame, the endpoint MUST close the TCP connection. 872 </p> 873 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.1.p.2">Note that the session compression state is dependent upon both endpoints always processing all compressed data. If an endpoint 874 partially processes a frame containing compressed data without updating compression state properly, future control frames 875 which use compression will be always be errored. Implementations SHOULD always try to process compressed data so that errors 876 which could be handled as stream errors do not become session errors. 877 </p> 878 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.1.p.3">Note that because this GOAWAY is sent during a session error case, it is possible that the GOAWAY will not be reliably received 879 by the receiving endpoint. It is a best-effort attempt to communicate with the remote about why the session is going down. 880 </p> 881 </div> 882 <div id="StreamErrorHandler"> 883 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.4.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.4.2">2.4.2</a> <a href="#StreamErrorHandler">Stream Error Handling</a></h3> 884 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.2.p.1">A stream error is an error related to a specific stream-id which does not affect processing of other streams at the framing 885 layer. Upon a stream error, the endpoint MUST send a RST_STREAM (<a href="#RST_STREAM" title="RST_STREAM">Section 2.6.3</a>) frame which contains the stream id of the stream where the error occurred and the error status which caused the error. After 886 sending the RST_STREAM, the stream is closed to the sending endpoint. After sending the RST_STREAM, if the sender receives 887 any frames other than a RST_STREAM for that stream id, it will result in sending additional RST_STREAM frames. An endpoint 888 MUST NOT send a RST_STREAM in response to an RST_STREAM, as doing so would lead to RST_STREAM loops. Sending a RST_STREAM 889 does not cause the SPDY session to be closed. 890 </p> 891 <p id="rfc.section.2.4.2.p.2">If an endpoint has multiple RST_STREAM frames to send in succession for the same stream-id and the same error code, it MAY 892 coalesce them into a single RST_STREAM frame. (This can happen if a stream is closed, but the remote sends multiple data frames. 893 There is no reason to send a RST_STREAM for each frame in succession). 894 </p> 895 </div> 896 </div> 897 <div> 898 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.5"><a href="#rfc.section.2.5">2.5</a> Data flow 899 </h2> 900 <p id="rfc.section.2.5.p.1">Because TCP provides a single stream of data on which SPDY multiplexes multiple logical streams, clients and servers must 901 intelligently interleave data messages for concurrent sessions. 902 </p> 903 </div> 904 <div> 905 <h2 id="rfc.section.2.6"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6">2.6</a> Control frame types 906 </h2> 907 <div id="SYN_STREAM"> 908 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.1">2.6.1</a> <a href="#SYN_STREAM">SYN_STREAM</a></h3> 909 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.1">The SYN_STREAM control frame allows the sender to asynchronously create a stream between the endpoints. See Stream Creation (<a href="#StreamCreation" title="Stream creation">Section 2.3.2</a>) 910 </p> 911 <div id="rfc.figure.u.3"></div><pre>+------------------------------------+ 888 912 |1| version | 1 | 889 913 +------------------------------------+ … … 907 931 +------------------------------------+ | 908 932 | (repeats) | <+ 909 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.3">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Valid flags are: </p> 910 <ul class="empty"> 911 <li>0x01 = FLAG_FIN - marks this frame as the last frame to be transmitted on this stream and puts the sender in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 912 </li> 913 <li>0x02 = FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL - a stream created with this flag puts the recipient in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 914 </li> 915 </ul> 916 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.4">Length: The length is the number of bytes which follow the length field in the frame. For SYN_STREAM frames, this is 10 bytes 917 plus the length of the compressed Name/Value block. 918 </p> 919 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.5">Stream-ID: The 31-bit identifier for this stream. This stream-id will be used in frames which are part of this stream.</p> 920 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.6">Associated-To-Stream-ID: The 31-bit identifier for a stream which this stream is associated to. If this stream is independent 921 of all other streams, it should be 0. 922 </p> 923 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.7">Priority: A 3-bit priority (<a href="#StreamPriority" title="Stream priority">Section 2.3.3</a>) field. 924 </p> 925 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.8">Unused: 5 bits of unused space, reserved for future use.</p> 926 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.9">Slot: An 8 bit unsigned integer specifying the index in the server's CREDENTIAL vector of the client certificate to be used 927 for this request. see CREDENTIAL frame (<a href="#CREDENTIAL" title="CREDENTIAL">Section 2.6.9</a>). The value 0 means no client certificate should be associated with this stream. 928 </p> 929 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.10">Name/Value Header Block: A set of name/value pairs carried as part of the SYN_STREAM. see Name/Value Header Block (<a href="#HeaderBlock" title="Name/Value Header Block">Section 2.6.10</a>). 930 </p> 931 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.11">If an endpoint receives a SYN_STREAM which is larger than the implementation supports, it MAY send a RST_STREAM with error 932 code FRAME_TOO_LARGE. All implementations MUST support the minimum size limits defined in the Control Frames section (<a href="#ControlFrames" title="Control frames">Section 2.2.1</a>). 933 </p> 934 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.2">2.6.2</a> <a id="SYN_REPLY" href="#SYN_REPLY">SYN_REPLY</a></h3> 935 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.1">SYN_REPLY indicates the acceptance of a stream creation by the recipient of a SYN_STREAM frame.</p> 936 <div id="rfc.figure.u.4"></div> <pre>+------------------------------------+ 933 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.3">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Valid flags are: </p> 934 <ul class="empty"> 935 <li>0x01 = FLAG_FIN - marks this frame as the last frame to be transmitted on this stream and puts the sender in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 936 </li> 937 <li>0x02 = FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL - a stream created with this flag puts the recipient in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 938 </li> 939 </ul> 940 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.4">Length: The length is the number of bytes which follow the length field in the frame. For SYN_STREAM frames, this is 10 bytes 941 plus the length of the compressed Name/Value block. 942 </p> 943 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.5">Stream-ID: The 31-bit identifier for this stream. This stream-id will be used in frames which are part of this stream.</p> 944 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.6">Associated-To-Stream-ID: The 31-bit identifier for a stream which this stream is associated to. If this stream is independent 945 of all other streams, it should be 0. 946 </p> 947 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.7">Priority: A 3-bit priority (<a href="#StreamPriority" title="Stream priority">Section 2.3.3</a>) field. 948 </p> 949 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.8">Unused: 5 bits of unused space, reserved for future use.</p> 950 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.9">Slot: An 8 bit unsigned integer specifying the index in the server's CREDENTIAL vector of the client certificate to be used 951 for this request. see CREDENTIAL frame (<a href="#CREDENTIAL" title="CREDENTIAL">Section 2.6.9</a>). The value 0 means no client certificate should be associated with this stream. 952 </p> 953 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.10">Name/Value Header Block: A set of name/value pairs carried as part of the SYN_STREAM. see Name/Value Header Block (<a href="#HeaderBlock" title="Name/Value Header Block">Section 2.6.10</a>). 954 </p> 955 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.1.p.11">If an endpoint receives a SYN_STREAM which is larger than the implementation supports, it MAY send a RST_STREAM with error 956 code FRAME_TOO_LARGE. All implementations MUST support the minimum size limits defined in the Control Frames section (<a href="#ControlFrames" title="Control frames">Section 2.2.1</a>). 957 </p> 958 </div> 959 <div id="SYN_REPLY"> 960 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.2">2.6.2</a> <a href="#SYN_REPLY">SYN_REPLY</a></h3> 961 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.1">SYN_REPLY indicates the acceptance of a stream creation by the recipient of a SYN_STREAM frame.</p> 962 <div id="rfc.figure.u.4"></div><pre>+------------------------------------+ 937 963 |1| version | 2 | 938 964 +------------------------------------+ … … 952 978 +------------------------------------+ | 953 979 | (repeats) | <+ 954 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.3">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Valid flags are: </p> 955 <ul class="empty"> 956 <li>0x01 = FLAG_FIN - marks this frame as the last frame to be transmitted on this stream and puts the sender in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 957 </li> 958 </ul> 959 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.4">Length: The length is the number of bytes which follow the length field in the frame. For SYN_REPLY frames, this is 4 bytes 960 plus the length of the compressed Name/Value block. 961 </p> 962 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.5">Stream-ID: The 31-bit identifier for this stream.</p> 963 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.6">If an endpoint receives multiple SYN_REPLY frames for the same active stream ID, it MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the error code STREAM_IN_USE. 964 </p> 965 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.7">Name/Value Header Block: A set of name/value pairs carried as part of the SYN_STREAM. see Name/Value Header Block (<a href="#HeaderBlock" title="Name/Value Header Block">Section 2.6.10</a>). 966 </p> 967 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.8">If an endpoint receives a SYN_REPLY which is larger than the implementation supports, it MAY send a RST_STREAM with error 968 code FRAME_TOO_LARGE. All implementations MUST support the minimum size limits defined in the Control Frames section (<a href="#ControlFrames" title="Control frames">Section 2.2.1</a>). 969 </p> 970 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.3"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.3">2.6.3</a> <a id="RST_STREAM" href="#RST_STREAM">RST_STREAM</a></h3> 971 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.1">The RST_STREAM frame allows for abnormal termination of a stream. When sent by the creator of a stream, it indicates the creator 972 wishes to cancel the stream. When sent by the recipient of a stream, it indicates an error or that the recipient did not want 973 to accept the stream, so the stream should be closed. 974 </p> 975 <div id="rfc.figure.u.5"></div> <pre>+----------------------------------+ 980 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.3">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Valid flags are: </p> 981 <ul class="empty"> 982 <li>0x01 = FLAG_FIN - marks this frame as the last frame to be transmitted on this stream and puts the sender in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 983 </li> 984 </ul> 985 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.4">Length: The length is the number of bytes which follow the length field in the frame. For SYN_REPLY frames, this is 4 bytes 986 plus the length of the compressed Name/Value block. 987 </p> 988 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.5">Stream-ID: The 31-bit identifier for this stream.</p> 989 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.6">If an endpoint receives multiple SYN_REPLY frames for the same active stream ID, it MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the error code STREAM_IN_USE. 990 </p> 991 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.7">Name/Value Header Block: A set of name/value pairs carried as part of the SYN_STREAM. see Name/Value Header Block (<a href="#HeaderBlock" title="Name/Value Header Block">Section 2.6.10</a>). 992 </p> 993 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.2.p.8">If an endpoint receives a SYN_REPLY which is larger than the implementation supports, it MAY send a RST_STREAM with error 994 code FRAME_TOO_LARGE. All implementations MUST support the minimum size limits defined in the Control Frames section (<a href="#ControlFrames" title="Control frames">Section 2.2.1</a>). 995 </p> 996 </div> 997 <div id="RST_STREAM"> 998 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.3"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.3">2.6.3</a> <a href="#RST_STREAM">RST_STREAM</a></h3> 999 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.1">The RST_STREAM frame allows for abnormal termination of a stream. When sent by the creator of a stream, it indicates the creator 1000 wishes to cancel the stream. When sent by the recipient of a stream, it indicates an error or that the recipient did not want 1001 to accept the stream, so the stream should be closed. 1002 </p> 1003 <div id="rfc.figure.u.5"></div><pre>+----------------------------------+ 976 1004 |1| version | 3 | 977 1005 +----------------------------------+ … … 982 1010 | Status code | 983 1011 +----------------------------------+ 984 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.3">Flags: Flags related to this frame. RST_STREAM does not define any flags. This value must be 0.</p> 985 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.4">Length: An unsigned 24-bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field. For RST_STREAM control frames, this 986 value is always 8. 987 </p> 988 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.5">Stream-ID: The 31-bit identifier for this stream.</p> 989 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.6">Status code: (32 bits) An indicator for why the stream is being terminated.The following status codes are defined: </p> 990 <ul class="empty"> 991 <li>1 - PROTOCOL_ERROR. This is a generic error, and should only be used if a more specific error is not available.</li> 992 <li>2 - INVALID_STREAM. This is returned when a frame is received for a stream which is not active.</li> 993 <li>3 - REFUSED_STREAM. Indicates that the stream was refused before any processing has been done on the stream.</li> 994 <li>4 - UNSUPPORTED_VERSION. Indicates that the recipient of a stream does not support the SPDY version requested.</li> 995 <li>5 - CANCEL. Used by the creator of a stream to indicate that the stream is no longer needed.</li> 996 <li>6 - INTERNAL_ERROR. This is a generic error which can be used when the implementation has internally failed, not due to anything 997 in the protocol. 998 </li> 999 <li>7 - FLOW_CONTROL_ERROR. The endpoint detected that its peer violated the flow control protocol.</li> 1000 <li>8 - STREAM_IN_USE. The endpoint received a SYN_REPLY for a stream already open.</li> 1001 <li>9 - STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED. The endpoint received a data or SYN_REPLY frame for a stream which is half closed.</li> 1002 <li>10 - INVALID_CREDENTIALS. The server received a request for a resource whose origin does not have valid credentials in the 1003 client certificate vector. 1004 </li> 1005 <li>11 - FRAME_TOO_LARGE. The endpoint received a frame which this implementation could not support. If FRAME_TOO_LARGE is sent 1006 for a SYN_STREAM, HEADERS, or SYN_REPLY frame without fully processing the compressed portion of those frames, then the compression 1007 state will be out-of-sync with the other endpoint. In this case, senders of FRAME_TOO_LARGE MUST close the session. 1008 </li> 1009 <li>Note: 0 is not a valid status code for a RST_STREAM.</li> 1010 </ul> 1011 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.7">After receiving a RST_STREAM on a stream, the recipient must not send additional frames for that stream, and the stream moves 1012 into the closed state. 1013 </p> 1014 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.4"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.4">2.6.4</a> <a id="SETTINGS" href="#SETTINGS">SETTINGS</a></h3> 1015 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.1">A SETTINGS frame contains a set of id/value pairs for communicating configuration data about how the two endpoints may communicate. 1016 SETTINGS frames can be sent at any time by either endpoint, are optionally sent, and are fully asynchronous. When the server 1017 is the sender, the sender can request that configuration data be persisted by the client across SPDY sessions and returned 1018 to the server in future communications. 1019 </p> 1020 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.2">Persistence of SETTINGS ID/Value pairs is done on a per origin/IP pair (the "origin" is the set of scheme, host, and port 1021 from the URI. See <a href="#RFC6454" id="rfc.xref.RFC6454.1"><cite title="The Web Origin Concept">[RFC6454]</cite></a>). That is, when a client connects to a server, and the server persists settings within the client, the client SHOULD return 1022 the persisted settings on future connections to the same origin AND IP address and TCP port. Clients MUST NOT request servers 1023 to use the persistence features of the SETTINGS frames, and servers MUST ignore persistence related flags sent by a client. 1024 </p> 1025 <div id="rfc.figure.u.6"></div> <pre>+----------------------------------+ 1012 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.3">Flags: Flags related to this frame. RST_STREAM does not define any flags. This value must be 0.</p> 1013 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.4">Length: An unsigned 24-bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field. For RST_STREAM control frames, this 1014 value is always 8. 1015 </p> 1016 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.5">Stream-ID: The 31-bit identifier for this stream.</p> 1017 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.6">Status code: (32 bits) An indicator for why the stream is being terminated.The following status codes are defined: </p> 1018 <ul class="empty"> 1019 <li>1 - PROTOCOL_ERROR. This is a generic error, and should only be used if a more specific error is not available.</li> 1020 <li>2 - INVALID_STREAM. This is returned when a frame is received for a stream which is not active.</li> 1021 <li>3 - REFUSED_STREAM. Indicates that the stream was refused before any processing has been done on the stream.</li> 1022 <li>4 - UNSUPPORTED_VERSION. Indicates that the recipient of a stream does not support the SPDY version requested.</li> 1023 <li>5 - CANCEL. Used by the creator of a stream to indicate that the stream is no longer needed.</li> 1024 <li>6 - INTERNAL_ERROR. This is a generic error which can be used when the implementation has internally failed, not due to anything 1025 in the protocol. 1026 </li> 1027 <li>7 - FLOW_CONTROL_ERROR. The endpoint detected that its peer violated the flow control protocol.</li> 1028 <li>8 - STREAM_IN_USE. The endpoint received a SYN_REPLY for a stream already open.</li> 1029 <li>9 - STREAM_ALREADY_CLOSED. The endpoint received a data or SYN_REPLY frame for a stream which is half closed.</li> 1030 <li>10 - INVALID_CREDENTIALS. The server received a request for a resource whose origin does not have valid credentials in the 1031 client certificate vector. 1032 </li> 1033 <li>11 - FRAME_TOO_LARGE. The endpoint received a frame which this implementation could not support. If FRAME_TOO_LARGE is sent 1034 for a SYN_STREAM, HEADERS, or SYN_REPLY frame without fully processing the compressed portion of those frames, then the compression 1035 state will be out-of-sync with the other endpoint. In this case, senders of FRAME_TOO_LARGE MUST close the session. 1036 </li> 1037 <li>Note: 0 is not a valid status code for a RST_STREAM.</li> 1038 </ul> 1039 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.3.p.7">After receiving a RST_STREAM on a stream, the recipient must not send additional frames for that stream, and the stream moves 1040 into the closed state. 1041 </p> 1042 </div> 1043 <div id="SETTINGS"> 1044 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.4"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.4">2.6.4</a> <a href="#SETTINGS">SETTINGS</a></h3> 1045 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.1">A SETTINGS frame contains a set of id/value pairs for communicating configuration data about how the two endpoints may communicate. 1046 SETTINGS frames can be sent at any time by either endpoint, are optionally sent, and are fully asynchronous. When the server 1047 is the sender, the sender can request that configuration data be persisted by the client across SPDY sessions and returned 1048 to the server in future communications. 1049 </p> 1050 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.2">Persistence of SETTINGS ID/Value pairs is done on a per origin/IP pair (the "origin" is the set of scheme, host, and port 1051 from the URI. See <a href="#RFC6454" id="rfc.xref.RFC6454.1"><cite title="The Web Origin Concept">[RFC6454]</cite></a>). That is, when a client connects to a server, and the server persists settings within the client, the client SHOULD return 1052 the persisted settings on future connections to the same origin AND IP address and TCP port. Clients MUST NOT request servers 1053 to use the persistence features of the SETTINGS frames, and servers MUST ignore persistence related flags sent by a client. 1054 </p> 1055 <div id="rfc.figure.u.6"></div><pre>+----------------------------------+ 1026 1056 |1| version | 4 | 1027 1057 +----------------------------------+ … … 1032 1062 | ID/Value Pairs | 1033 1063 | ... | 1034 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.4">Control bit: The control bit is always 1 for this message.</p> 1035 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.5">Version: The SPDY version number.</p> 1036 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.6">Type: The message type for a SETTINGS message is 4.</p> 1037 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.7">Flags: FLAG_SETTINGS_CLEAR_SETTINGS (0x1): When set, the client should clear any previously persisted SETTINGS ID/Value pairs. 1038 If this frame contains ID/Value pairs with the FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE set, then the client will first clear its existing, 1039 persisted settings, and then persist the values with the flag set which are contained within this frame. Because persistence 1040 is only implemented on the client, this flag can only be used when the sender is the server. 1041 </p> 1042 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.8">Length: An unsigned 24-bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field. The total size of a SETTINGS frame 1043 is 8 bytes + length. 1044 </p> 1045 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.9">Number of entries: A 32-bit value representing the number of ID/value pairs in this message.</p> 1046 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.10">ID: A 32-bit ID number, comprised of 8 bits of flags and 24 bits of unique ID. </p> 1047 <ul class="empty"> 1048 <li>ID.flags: 1049 <ul class="empty"> 1050 <li>FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE (0x1): When set, the sender of this SETTINGS frame is requesting that the recipient persist the 1051 ID/Value and return it in future SETTINGS frames sent from the sender to this recipient. Because persistence is only implemented 1052 on the client, this flag is only sent by the server. 1053 </li> 1054 <li>FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSISTED (0x2): When set, the sender is notifying the recipient that this ID/Value pair was previously sent 1055 to the sender by the recipient with the FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE, and the sender is returning it. Because persistence is 1056 only implemented on the client, this flag is only sent by the client. 1057 </li> 1058 </ul> 1059 </li> 1060 <li>Defined IDs: 1061 <ul class="empty"> 1062 <li>1 - SETTINGS_UPLOAD_BANDWIDTH allows the sender to send its expected upload bandwidth on this channel. This number is an estimate. 1063 The value should be the integral number of kilobytes per second that the sender predicts as an expected maximum upload channel 1064 capacity. 1065 </li> 1066 <li>2 - SETTINGS_DOWNLOAD_BANDWIDTH allows the sender to send its expected download bandwidth on this channel. This number is 1067 an estimate. The value should be the integral number of kilobytes per second that the sender predicts as an expected maximum 1068 download channel capacity. 1069 </li> 1070 <li>3 - SETTINGS_ROUND_TRIP_TIME allows the sender to send its expected round-trip-time on this channel. The round trip time is 1071 defined as the minimum amount of time to send a control frame from this client to the remote and receive a response. The value 1072 is represented in milliseconds. 1073 </li> 1074 <li>4 - SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS allows the sender to inform the remote endpoint the maximum number of concurrent streams 1075 which it will allow. By default there is no limit. For implementors it is recommended that this value be no smaller than 100. 1076 </li> 1077 <li>5 - SETTINGS_CURRENT_CWND allows the sender to inform the remote endpoint of the current TCP CWND value.</li> 1078 <li>6 - SETTINGS_DOWNLOAD_RETRANS_RATE allows the sender to inform the remote endpoint the retransmission rate (bytes retransmitted 1079 / total bytes transmitted). 1080 </li> 1081 <li>7 - SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE allows the sender to inform the remote endpoint the initial window size (in bytes) for new 1082 streams. 1083 </li> 1084 <li>8 - SETTINGS_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE_VECTOR_SIZE allows the server to inform the client if the new size of the client certificate 1085 vector. 1086 </li> 1087 </ul> 1088 </li> 1089 </ul> 1090 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.11">Value: A 32-bit value.</p> 1091 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.12">The message is intentionally extensible for future information which may improve client-server communications. The sender 1092 does not need to send every type of ID/value. It must only send those for which it has accurate values to convey. When multiple 1093 ID/value pairs are sent, they should be sent in order of lowest id to highest id. A single SETTINGS frame MUST not contain 1094 multiple values for the same ID. If the recipient of a SETTINGS frame discovers multiple values for the same ID, it MUST ignore 1095 all values except the first one. 1096 </p> 1097 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.13">A server may send multiple SETTINGS frames containing different ID/Value pairs. When the same ID/Value is sent twice, the 1098 most recent value overrides any previously sent values. If the server sends IDs 1, 2, and 3 with the FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE 1099 in a first SETTINGS frame, and then sends IDs 4 and 5 with the FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE, when the client returns the persisted 1100 state on its next SETTINGS frame, it SHOULD send all 5 settings (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in this example) to the server. 1101 </p> 1102 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.5"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.5">2.6.5</a> <a id="PING" href="#PING">PING</a></h3> 1103 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.1">The PING control frame is a mechanism for measuring a minimal round-trip time from the sender. It can be sent from the client 1104 or the server. Recipients of a PING frame should send an identical frame to the sender as soon as possible (if there is other 1105 pending data waiting to be sent, PING should take highest priority). Each ping sent by a sender should use a unique ID. 1106 </p> 1107 <div id="rfc.figure.u.7"></div> <pre>+----------------------------------+ 1064 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.4">Control bit: The control bit is always 1 for this message.</p> 1065 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.5">Version: The SPDY version number.</p> 1066 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.6">Type: The message type for a SETTINGS message is 4.</p> 1067 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.7">Flags: FLAG_SETTINGS_CLEAR_SETTINGS (0x1): When set, the client should clear any previously persisted SETTINGS ID/Value pairs. 1068 If this frame contains ID/Value pairs with the FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE set, then the client will first clear its existing, 1069 persisted settings, and then persist the values with the flag set which are contained within this frame. Because persistence 1070 is only implemented on the client, this flag can only be used when the sender is the server. 1071 </p> 1072 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.8">Length: An unsigned 24-bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field. The total size of a SETTINGS frame 1073 is 8 bytes + length. 1074 </p> 1075 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.9">Number of entries: A 32-bit value representing the number of ID/value pairs in this message.</p> 1076 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.10">ID: A 32-bit ID number, comprised of 8 bits of flags and 24 bits of unique ID. </p> 1077 <ul class="empty"> 1078 <li>ID.flags: 1079 <ul class="empty"> 1080 <li>FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE (0x1): When set, the sender of this SETTINGS frame is requesting that the recipient persist the 1081 ID/Value and return it in future SETTINGS frames sent from the sender to this recipient. Because persistence is only implemented 1082 on the client, this flag is only sent by the server. 1083 </li> 1084 <li>FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSISTED (0x2): When set, the sender is notifying the recipient that this ID/Value pair was previously sent 1085 to the sender by the recipient with the FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE, and the sender is returning it. Because persistence is 1086 only implemented on the client, this flag is only sent by the client. 1087 </li> 1088 </ul> 1089 </li> 1090 <li>Defined IDs: 1091 <ul class="empty"> 1092 <li>1 - SETTINGS_UPLOAD_BANDWIDTH allows the sender to send its expected upload bandwidth on this channel. This number is an estimate. 1093 The value should be the integral number of kilobytes per second that the sender predicts as an expected maximum upload channel 1094 capacity. 1095 </li> 1096 <li>2 - SETTINGS_DOWNLOAD_BANDWIDTH allows the sender to send its expected download bandwidth on this channel. This number is 1097 an estimate. The value should be the integral number of kilobytes per second that the sender predicts as an expected maximum 1098 download channel capacity. 1099 </li> 1100 <li>3 - SETTINGS_ROUND_TRIP_TIME allows the sender to send its expected round-trip-time on this channel. The round trip time is 1101 defined as the minimum amount of time to send a control frame from this client to the remote and receive a response. The value 1102 is represented in milliseconds. 1103 </li> 1104 <li>4 - SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS allows the sender to inform the remote endpoint the maximum number of concurrent streams 1105 which it will allow. By default there is no limit. For implementors it is recommended that this value be no smaller than 100. 1106 </li> 1107 <li>5 - SETTINGS_CURRENT_CWND allows the sender to inform the remote endpoint of the current TCP CWND value.</li> 1108 <li>6 - SETTINGS_DOWNLOAD_RETRANS_RATE allows the sender to inform the remote endpoint the retransmission rate (bytes retransmitted 1109 / total bytes transmitted). 1110 </li> 1111 <li>7 - SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE allows the sender to inform the remote endpoint the initial window size (in bytes) for new 1112 streams. 1113 </li> 1114 <li>8 - SETTINGS_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE_VECTOR_SIZE allows the server to inform the client if the new size of the client certificate 1115 vector. 1116 </li> 1117 </ul> 1118 </li> 1119 </ul> 1120 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.11">Value: A 32-bit value.</p> 1121 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.12">The message is intentionally extensible for future information which may improve client-server communications. The sender 1122 does not need to send every type of ID/value. It must only send those for which it has accurate values to convey. When multiple 1123 ID/value pairs are sent, they should be sent in order of lowest id to highest id. A single SETTINGS frame MUST not contain 1124 multiple values for the same ID. If the recipient of a SETTINGS frame discovers multiple values for the same ID, it MUST ignore 1125 all values except the first one. 1126 </p> 1127 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.4.p.13">A server may send multiple SETTINGS frames containing different ID/Value pairs. When the same ID/Value is sent twice, the 1128 most recent value overrides any previously sent values. If the server sends IDs 1, 2, and 3 with the FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE 1129 in a first SETTINGS frame, and then sends IDs 4 and 5 with the FLAG_SETTINGS_PERSIST_VALUE, when the client returns the persisted 1130 state on its next SETTINGS frame, it SHOULD send all 5 settings (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in this example) to the server. 1131 </p> 1132 </div> 1133 <div id="PING"> 1134 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.5"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.5">2.6.5</a> <a href="#PING">PING</a></h3> 1135 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.1">The PING control frame is a mechanism for measuring a minimal round-trip time from the sender. It can be sent from the client 1136 or the server. Recipients of a PING frame should send an identical frame to the sender as soon as possible (if there is other 1137 pending data waiting to be sent, PING should take highest priority). Each ping sent by a sender should use a unique ID. 1138 </p> 1139 <div id="rfc.figure.u.7"></div><pre>+----------------------------------+ 1108 1140 |1| version | 6 | 1109 1141 +----------------------------------+ … … 1112 1144 | 32-bit ID | 1113 1145 +----------------------------------+ 1114 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.3">Control bit: The control bit is always 1 for this message.</p> 1115 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.4">Version: The SPDY version number.</p> 1116 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.5">Type: The message type for a PING message is 6.</p> 1117 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.6">Length: This frame is always 4 bytes long.</p> 1118 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.7">ID: A unique ID for this ping, represented as an unsigned 32 bit value. When the client initiates a ping, it must use an odd 1119 numbered ID. When the server initiates a ping, it must use an even numbered ping. Use of odd/even IDs is required in order 1120 to avoid accidental looping on PINGs (where each side initiates an identical PING at the same time). 1121 </p> 1122 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.8">Note: If a sender uses all possible PING ids (e.g. has sent all 2^31 possible IDs), it can wrap and start re-using IDs.</p> 1123 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.9">If a server receives an even numbered PING which it did not initiate, it must ignore the PING. If a client receives an odd 1124 numbered PING which it did not initiate, it must ignore the PING. 1125 </p> 1126 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.6"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.6">2.6.6</a> <a id="GOAWAY" href="#GOAWAY">GOAWAY</a></h3> 1127 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.1">The GOAWAY control frame is a mechanism to tell the remote side of the connection to stop creating streams on this session. 1128 It can be sent from the client or the server. Once sent, the sender will not respond to any new SYN_STREAMs on this session. 1129 Recipients of a GOAWAY frame must not send additional streams on this session, although a new session can be established for 1130 new streams. The purpose of this message is to allow an endpoint to gracefully stop accepting new streams (perhaps for a reboot 1131 or maintenance), while still finishing processing of previously established streams. 1132 </p> 1133 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.2">There is an inherent race condition between an endpoint sending SYN_STREAMs and the remote sending a GOAWAY message. To deal 1134 with this case, the GOAWAY contains a last-stream-id indicating the stream-id of the last stream which was created on the 1135 sending endpoint in this session. If the receiver of the GOAWAY sent new SYN_STREAMs for sessions after this last-stream-id, 1136 they were not processed by the server and the receiver may treat the stream as though it had never been created at all (hence 1137 the receiver may want to re-create the stream later on a new session). 1138 </p> 1139 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.3">Endpoints should always send a GOAWAY message before closing a connection so that the remote can know whether a stream has 1140 been partially processed or not. (For example, if an HTTP client sends a POST at the same time that a server closes a connection, 1141 the client cannot know if the server started to process that POST request if the server does not send a GOAWAY frame to indicate 1142 where it stopped working). 1143 </p> 1144 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.4">After sending a GOAWAY message, the sender must ignore all SYN_STREAM frames for new streams.</p> 1145 <div id="rfc.figure.u.8"></div> <pre>+----------------------------------+ 1146 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.3">Control bit: The control bit is always 1 for this message.</p> 1147 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.4">Version: The SPDY version number.</p> 1148 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.5">Type: The message type for a PING message is 6.</p> 1149 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.6">Length: This frame is always 4 bytes long.</p> 1150 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.7">ID: A unique ID for this ping, represented as an unsigned 32 bit value. When the client initiates a ping, it must use an odd 1151 numbered ID. When the server initiates a ping, it must use an even numbered ping. Use of odd/even IDs is required in order 1152 to avoid accidental looping on PINGs (where each side initiates an identical PING at the same time). 1153 </p> 1154 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.8">Note: If a sender uses all possible PING ids (e.g. has sent all 2^31 possible IDs), it can wrap and start re-using IDs.</p> 1155 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.5.p.9">If a server receives an even numbered PING which it did not initiate, it must ignore the PING. If a client receives an odd 1156 numbered PING which it did not initiate, it must ignore the PING. 1157 </p> 1158 </div> 1159 <div id="GOAWAY"> 1160 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.6"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.6">2.6.6</a> <a href="#GOAWAY">GOAWAY</a></h3> 1161 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.1">The GOAWAY control frame is a mechanism to tell the remote side of the connection to stop creating streams on this session. 1162 It can be sent from the client or the server. Once sent, the sender will not respond to any new SYN_STREAMs on this session. 1163 Recipients of a GOAWAY frame must not send additional streams on this session, although a new session can be established for 1164 new streams. The purpose of this message is to allow an endpoint to gracefully stop accepting new streams (perhaps for a reboot 1165 or maintenance), while still finishing processing of previously established streams. 1166 </p> 1167 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.2">There is an inherent race condition between an endpoint sending SYN_STREAMs and the remote sending a GOAWAY message. To deal 1168 with this case, the GOAWAY contains a last-stream-id indicating the stream-id of the last stream which was created on the 1169 sending endpoint in this session. If the receiver of the GOAWAY sent new SYN_STREAMs for sessions after this last-stream-id, 1170 they were not processed by the server and the receiver may treat the stream as though it had never been created at all (hence 1171 the receiver may want to re-create the stream later on a new session). 1172 </p> 1173 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.3">Endpoints should always send a GOAWAY message before closing a connection so that the remote can know whether a stream has 1174 been partially processed or not. (For example, if an HTTP client sends a POST at the same time that a server closes a connection, 1175 the client cannot know if the server started to process that POST request if the server does not send a GOAWAY frame to indicate 1176 where it stopped working). 1177 </p> 1178 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.4">After sending a GOAWAY message, the sender must ignore all SYN_STREAM frames for new streams.</p> 1179 <div id="rfc.figure.u.8"></div><pre>+----------------------------------+ 1146 1180 |1| version | 7 | 1147 1181 +----------------------------------+ … … 1152 1186 | Status code | 1153 1187 +----------------------------------+ 1154 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.6">Control bit: The control bit is always 1 for this message.</p> 1155 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.7">Version: The SPDY version number.</p> 1156 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.8">Type: The message type for a GOAWAY message is 7.</p> 1157 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.9">Length: This frame is always 8 bytes long.</p> 1158 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.10">Last-good-stream-Id: The last stream id which was replied to (with either a SYN_REPLY or RST_STREAM) by the sender of the 1159 GOAWAY message. If no streams were replied to, this value MUST be 0. 1160 </p> 1161 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.11">Status: The reason for closing the session. </p> 1162 <ul class="empty"> 1163 <li>0 - OK. This is a normal session teardown.</li> 1164 <li>1 - PROTOCOL_ERROR. This is a generic error, and should only be used if a more specific error is not available.</li> 1165 <li>11 - INTERNAL_ERROR. This is a generic error which can be used when the implementation has internally failed, not due to anything 1166 in the protocol. 1167 </li> 1168 </ul> 1169 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.7"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.7">2.6.7</a> <a id="HEADERS" href="#HEADERS">HEADERS</a></h3> 1170 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.1">The HEADERS frame augments a stream with additional headers. It may be optionally sent on an existing stream at any time. 1171 Specific application of the headers in this frame is application-dependent. The name/value header block within this frame 1172 is compressed. 1173 </p> 1174 <div id="rfc.figure.u.9"></div> <pre>+------------------------------------+ 1188 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.6">Control bit: The control bit is always 1 for this message.</p> 1189 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.7">Version: The SPDY version number.</p> 1190 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.8">Type: The message type for a GOAWAY message is 7.</p> 1191 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.9">Length: This frame is always 8 bytes long.</p> 1192 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.10">Last-good-stream-Id: The last stream id which was replied to (with either a SYN_REPLY or RST_STREAM) by the sender of the 1193 GOAWAY message. If no streams were replied to, this value MUST be 0. 1194 </p> 1195 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.6.p.11">Status: The reason for closing the session. </p> 1196 <ul class="empty"> 1197 <li>0 - OK. This is a normal session teardown.</li> 1198 <li>1 - PROTOCOL_ERROR. This is a generic error, and should only be used if a more specific error is not available.</li> 1199 <li>11 - INTERNAL_ERROR. This is a generic error which can be used when the implementation has internally failed, not due to anything 1200 in the protocol. 1201 </li> 1202 </ul> 1203 </div> 1204 <div id="HEADERS"> 1205 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.7"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.7">2.6.7</a> <a href="#HEADERS">HEADERS</a></h3> 1206 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.1">The HEADERS frame augments a stream with additional headers. It may be optionally sent on an existing stream at any time. 1207 Specific application of the headers in this frame is application-dependent. The name/value header block within this frame 1208 is compressed. 1209 </p> 1210 <div id="rfc.figure.u.9"></div><pre>+------------------------------------+ 1175 1211 |1| version | 8 | 1176 1212 +------------------------------------+ … … 1190 1226 +------------------------------------+ | 1191 1227 | (repeats) | <+ 1192 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.3">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Valid flags are: </p> 1193 <ul class="empty"> 1194 <li>0x01 = FLAG_FIN - marks this frame as the last frame to be transmitted on this stream and puts the sender in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 1195 </li> 1196 </ul> 1197 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.4">Length: An unsigned 24 bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field. The minimum length of the length 1198 field is 4 (when the number of name value pairs is 0). 1199 </p> 1200 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.5">Stream-ID: The stream this HEADERS block is associated with.</p> 1201 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.6">Name/Value Header Block: A set of name/value pairs carried as part of the SYN_STREAM. see Name/Value Header Block (<a href="#HeaderBlock" title="Name/Value Header Block">Section 2.6.10</a>). 1202 </p> 1203 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.8"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.8">2.6.8</a> <a id="WINDOW_UPDATE" href="#WINDOW_UPDATE">WINDOW_UPDATE</a></h3> 1204 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.1">The WINDOW_UPDATE control frame is used to implement per stream flow control in SPDY. Flow control in SPDY is per hop, that 1205 is, only between the two endpoints of a SPDY connection. If there are one or more intermediaries between the client and the 1206 origin server, flow control signals are not explicitly forwarded by the intermediaries. (However, throttling of data transfer 1207 by any recipient may have the effect of indirectly propagating flow control information upstream back to the original sender.) 1208 Flow control only applies to the data portion of data frames. Recipients must buffer all control frames. If a recipient fails 1209 to buffer an entire control frame, it MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code FLOW_CONTROL_ERROR for the stream. 1210 </p> 1211 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.2">Flow control in SPDY is implemented by a data transfer window kept by the sender of each stream. The data transfer window 1212 is a simple uint32 that indicates how many bytes of data the sender can transmit. After a stream is created, but before any 1213 data frames have been transmitted, the sender begins with the initial window size. This window size is a measure of the buffering 1214 capability of the recipient. The sender must not send a data frame with data length greater than the transfer window size. 1215 After sending each data frame, the sender decrements its transfer window size by the amount of data transmitted. When the 1216 window size becomes less than or equal to 0, the sender must pause transmitting data frames. At the other end of the stream, 1217 the recipient sends a WINDOW_UPDATE control back to notify the sender that it has consumed some data and freed up buffer space 1218 to receive more data. 1219 </p> 1220 <div id="rfc.figure.u.10"></div> <pre>+----------------------------------+ 1228 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.3">Flags: Flags related to this frame. Valid flags are: </p> 1229 <ul class="empty"> 1230 <li>0x01 = FLAG_FIN - marks this frame as the last frame to be transmitted on this stream and puts the sender in the half-closed (<a href="#StreamHalfClose" title="Stream half-close">Section 2.3.6</a>) state. 1231 </li> 1232 </ul> 1233 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.4">Length: An unsigned 24 bit value representing the number of bytes after the length field. The minimum length of the length 1234 field is 4 (when the number of name value pairs is 0). 1235 </p> 1236 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.5">Stream-ID: The stream this HEADERS block is associated with.</p> 1237 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.7.p.6">Name/Value Header Block: A set of name/value pairs carried as part of the SYN_STREAM. see Name/Value Header Block (<a href="#HeaderBlock" title="Name/Value Header Block">Section 2.6.10</a>). 1238 </p> 1239 </div> 1240 <div id="WINDOW_UPDATE"> 1241 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.8"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.8">2.6.8</a> <a href="#WINDOW_UPDATE">WINDOW_UPDATE</a></h3> 1242 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.1">The WINDOW_UPDATE control frame is used to implement per stream flow control in SPDY. Flow control in SPDY is per hop, that 1243 is, only between the two endpoints of a SPDY connection. If there are one or more intermediaries between the client and the 1244 origin server, flow control signals are not explicitly forwarded by the intermediaries. (However, throttling of data transfer 1245 by any recipient may have the effect of indirectly propagating flow control information upstream back to the original sender.) 1246 Flow control only applies to the data portion of data frames. Recipients must buffer all control frames. If a recipient fails 1247 to buffer an entire control frame, it MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code FLOW_CONTROL_ERROR for the stream. 1248 </p> 1249 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.2">Flow control in SPDY is implemented by a data transfer window kept by the sender of each stream. The data transfer window 1250 is a simple uint32 that indicates how many bytes of data the sender can transmit. After a stream is created, but before any 1251 data frames have been transmitted, the sender begins with the initial window size. This window size is a measure of the buffering 1252 capability of the recipient. The sender must not send a data frame with data length greater than the transfer window size. 1253 After sending each data frame, the sender decrements its transfer window size by the amount of data transmitted. When the 1254 window size becomes less than or equal to 0, the sender must pause transmitting data frames. At the other end of the stream, 1255 the recipient sends a WINDOW_UPDATE control back to notify the sender that it has consumed some data and freed up buffer space 1256 to receive more data. 1257 </p> 1258 <div id="rfc.figure.u.10"></div><pre>+----------------------------------+ 1221 1259 |1| version | 9 | 1222 1260 +----------------------------------+ … … 1227 1265 |X| Delta-Window-Size (31-bits) | 1228 1266 +----------------------------------+ 1229 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.4">Control bit: The control bit is always 1 for this message.</p> 1230 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.5">Version: The SPDY version number.</p> 1231 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.6">Type: The message type for a WINDOW_UPDATE message is 9.</p> 1232 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.7">Length: The length field is always 8 for this frame (there are 8 bytes after the length field).</p> 1233 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.8">Stream-ID: The stream ID that this WINDOW_UPDATE control frame is for.</p> 1234 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.9">Delta-Window-Size: The additional number of bytes that the sender can transmit in addition to existing remaining window size. 1235 The legal range for this field is 1 to 2^31 - 1 (0x7fffffff) bytes. 1236 </p> 1237 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.10">The window size as kept by the sender must never exceed 2^31 (although it can become negative in one special case). If a sender 1238 receives a WINDOW_UPDATE that causes the its window size to exceed this limit, it must send RST_STREAM with status code FLOW_CONTROL_ERROR 1239 to terminate the stream. 1240 </p> 1241 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.11">When a SPDY connection is first established, the default initial window size for all streams is 64KB. An endpoint can use 1242 the SETTINGS control frame to adjust the initial window size for the connection. That is, its peer can start out using the 1243 64KB default initial window size when sending data frames before receiving the SETTINGS. Because SETTINGS is asynchronous, 1244 there may be a race condition if the recipient wants to decrease the initial window size, but its peer immediately sends 64KB 1245 on the creation of a new connection, before waiting for the SETTINGS to arrive. This is one case where the window size kept 1246 by the sender will become negative. Once the sender detects this condition, it must stop sending data frames and wait for 1247 the recipient to catch up. The recipient has two choices: 1248 </p> 1249 <ul class="empty"> 1250 <li>immediately send RST_STREAM with FLOW_CONTROL_ERROR status code.</li> 1251 <li>allow the head of line blocking (as there is only one stream for the session and the amount of data in flight is bounded by 1252 the default initial window size), and send WINDOW_UPDATE as it consumes data. 1253 </li> 1254 </ul> 1255 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.12">In the case of option 2, both sides must compute the window size based on the initial window size in the SETTINGS. For example, 1256 if the recipient sets the initial window size to be 16KB, and the sender sends 64KB immediately on connection establishment, 1257 the sender will discover its window size is -48KB on receipt of the SETTINGS. As the recipient consumes the first 16KB, it 1258 must send a WINDOW_UPDATE of 16KB back to the sender. This interaction continues until the sender's window size becomes positive 1259 again, and it can resume transmitting data frames. 1260 </p> 1261 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.13">After the recipient reads in a data frame with FLAG_FIN that marks the end of the data stream, it should not send WINDOW_UPDATE 1262 frames as it consumes the last data frame. A sender should ignore all the WINDOW_UPDATE frames associated with the stream 1263 after it send the last frame for the stream. 1264 </p> 1265 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.14">The data frames from the sender and the WINDOW_UPDATE frames from the recipient are completely asynchronous with respect to 1266 each other. This property allows a recipient to aggressively update the window size kept by the sender to prevent the stream 1267 from stalling. 1268 </p> 1269 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.9"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.9">2.6.9</a> <a id="CREDENTIAL" href="#CREDENTIAL">CREDENTIAL</a></h3> 1270 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.1">The CREDENTIAL control frame is used by the client to send additional client certificates to the server. A SPDY client may 1271 decide to send requests for resources from different origins on the same SPDY session if it decides that that server handles 1272 both origins. For example if the IP address associated with both hostnames matches and the SSL server certificate presented 1273 in the initial handshake is valid for both hostnames. However, because the SSL connection can contain at most one client certificate, 1274 the client needs a mechanism to send additional client certificates to the server. 1275 </p> 1276 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.2">The server is required to maintain a vector of client certificates associated with a SPDY session. When the client needs to 1277 send a client certificate to the server, it will send a CREDENTIAL frame that specifies the index of the slot in which to 1278 store the certificate as well as proof that the client posesses the corresponding private key. The initial size of this vector 1279 must be 8. If the client provides a client certificate during the first TLS handshake, the contents of this certificate must 1280 be copied into the first slot (index 1) in the CREDENTIAL vector, though it may be overwritten by subsequent CREDENTIAL frames. 1281 The server must exclusively use the CREDNETIAL vector when evaluating the client certificates associated with an origin. The 1282 server may change the size of this vector by sending a SETTINGS frame with the setting SETTINGS_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE_VECTOR_SIZE 1283 value specified. In the event that the new size is smaller than the current size, truncation occurs preserving lower-index 1284 slots as possible. 1285 </p> 1286 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.3">TLS renegotiation with client authentication is incompatible with SPDY given the multiplexed nature of SPDY. Specifically, 1287 imagine that the client has 2 requests outstanding to the server for two different pages (in different tabs). When the renegotiation 1288 + client certificate request comes in, the browser is unable to determine which resource triggered the client certificate 1289 request, in order to prompt the user accordingly. 1290 </p> 1291 <div id="rfc.figure.u.11"></div> <pre>+----------------------------------+ 1267 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.4">Control bit: The control bit is always 1 for this message.</p> 1268 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.5">Version: The SPDY version number.</p> 1269 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.6">Type: The message type for a WINDOW_UPDATE message is 9.</p> 1270 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.7">Length: The length field is always 8 for this frame (there are 8 bytes after the length field).</p> 1271 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.8">Stream-ID: The stream ID that this WINDOW_UPDATE control frame is for.</p> 1272 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.9">Delta-Window-Size: The additional number of bytes that the sender can transmit in addition to existing remaining window size. 1273 The legal range for this field is 1 to 2^31 - 1 (0x7fffffff) bytes. 1274 </p> 1275 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.10">The window size as kept by the sender must never exceed 2^31 (although it can become negative in one special case). If a sender 1276 receives a WINDOW_UPDATE that causes the its window size to exceed this limit, it must send RST_STREAM with status code FLOW_CONTROL_ERROR 1277 to terminate the stream. 1278 </p> 1279 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.11">When a SPDY connection is first established, the default initial window size for all streams is 64KB. An endpoint can use 1280 the SETTINGS control frame to adjust the initial window size for the connection. That is, its peer can start out using the 1281 64KB default initial window size when sending data frames before receiving the SETTINGS. Because SETTINGS is asynchronous, 1282 there may be a race condition if the recipient wants to decrease the initial window size, but its peer immediately sends 64KB 1283 on the creation of a new connection, before waiting for the SETTINGS to arrive. This is one case where the window size kept 1284 by the sender will become negative. Once the sender detects this condition, it must stop sending data frames and wait for 1285 the recipient to catch up. The recipient has two choices: 1286 </p> 1287 <ul class="empty"> 1288 <li>immediately send RST_STREAM with FLOW_CONTROL_ERROR status code.</li> 1289 <li>allow the head of line blocking (as there is only one stream for the session and the amount of data in flight is bounded by 1290 the default initial window size), and send WINDOW_UPDATE as it consumes data. 1291 </li> 1292 </ul> 1293 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.12">In the case of option 2, both sides must compute the window size based on the initial window size in the SETTINGS. For example, 1294 if the recipient sets the initial window size to be 16KB, and the sender sends 64KB immediately on connection establishment, 1295 the sender will discover its window size is -48KB on receipt of the SETTINGS. As the recipient consumes the first 16KB, it 1296 must send a WINDOW_UPDATE of 16KB back to the sender. This interaction continues until the sender's window size becomes positive 1297 again, and it can resume transmitting data frames. 1298 </p> 1299 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.13">After the recipient reads in a data frame with FLAG_FIN that marks the end of the data stream, it should not send WINDOW_UPDATE 1300 frames as it consumes the last data frame. A sender should ignore all the WINDOW_UPDATE frames associated with the stream 1301 after it send the last frame for the stream. 1302 </p> 1303 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.8.p.14">The data frames from the sender and the WINDOW_UPDATE frames from the recipient are completely asynchronous with respect to 1304 each other. This property allows a recipient to aggressively update the window size kept by the sender to prevent the stream 1305 from stalling. 1306 </p> 1307 </div> 1308 <div id="CREDENTIAL"> 1309 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.9"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.9">2.6.9</a> <a href="#CREDENTIAL">CREDENTIAL</a></h3> 1310 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.1">The CREDENTIAL control frame is used by the client to send additional client certificates to the server. A SPDY client may 1311 decide to send requests for resources from different origins on the same SPDY session if it decides that that server handles 1312 both origins. For example if the IP address associated with both hostnames matches and the SSL server certificate presented 1313 in the initial handshake is valid for both hostnames. However, because the SSL connection can contain at most one client certificate, 1314 the client needs a mechanism to send additional client certificates to the server. 1315 </p> 1316 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.2">The server is required to maintain a vector of client certificates associated with a SPDY session. When the client needs to 1317 send a client certificate to the server, it will send a CREDENTIAL frame that specifies the index of the slot in which to 1318 store the certificate as well as proof that the client posesses the corresponding private key. The initial size of this vector 1319 must be 8. If the client provides a client certificate during the first TLS handshake, the contents of this certificate must 1320 be copied into the first slot (index 1) in the CREDENTIAL vector, though it may be overwritten by subsequent CREDENTIAL frames. 1321 The server must exclusively use the CREDNETIAL vector when evaluating the client certificates associated with an origin. The 1322 server may change the size of this vector by sending a SETTINGS frame with the setting SETTINGS_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE_VECTOR_SIZE 1323 value specified. In the event that the new size is smaller than the current size, truncation occurs preserving lower-index 1324 slots as possible. 1325 </p> 1326 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.3">TLS renegotiation with client authentication is incompatible with SPDY given the multiplexed nature of SPDY. Specifically, 1327 imagine that the client has 2 requests outstanding to the server for two different pages (in different tabs). When the renegotiation 1328 + client certificate request comes in, the browser is unable to determine which resource triggered the client certificate 1329 request, in order to prompt the user accordingly. 1330 </p> 1331 <div id="rfc.figure.u.11"></div><pre>+----------------------------------+ 1292 1332 |1|000000000000001|0000000000001011| 1293 1333 +----------------------------------+ … … 1304 1344 | Certificate | | 1305 1345 +----------------------------------+ <+ 1306 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.5">Slot: The index in the server's client certificate vector where this certificate should be stored. If there is already a certificate 1307 stored at this index, it will be overwritten. The index is one based, not zero based; zero is an invalid slot index. 1308 </p> 1309 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.6">Proof: Cryptographic proof that the client has possession of the private key associated with the certificate. The format is 1310 a TLS digitally-signed element (<a href="#RFC5246" id="rfc.xref.RFC5246.1"><cite title="The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2">[RFC5246]</cite></a>, <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246#section-4.7">Section 4.7</a>). The signature algorithm must be the same as that used in the CertificateVerify message. However, since the MD5+SHA1 signature 1311 type used in TLS 1.0 connections can not be correctly encoded in a digitally-signed element, SHA1 must be used when MD5+SHA1 1312 was used in the SSL connection. The signature is calculated over a 32 byte TLS extractor value (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5705) 1313 with a label of "EXPORTER SPDY certificate proof" using the empty string as context. ForRSA certificates the signature would 1314 be a PKCS#1 v1.5 signature. For ECDSA, it would be an ECDSA-Sig-Value (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5480#appendix-A). For 1315 a 1024-bit RSA key, the CREDENTIAL message would be ~500 bytes. 1316 </p> 1317 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.7">Certificate: The certificate chain, starting with the leaf certificate. Each certificate must be encoded as a 32 bit length, 1318 followed by a DER encoded certificate. The certificate must be of the same type (RSA, ECDSA, etc) as the client certificate 1319 associated with the SSL connection. 1320 </p> 1321 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.8">If the server receives a request for a resource with unacceptable credential (either missing or invalid), it must reply with 1322 a RST_STREAM frame with the status code INVALID_CREDENTIALS. Upon receipt of a RST_STREAM frame with INVALID_CREDENTIALS, 1323 the client should initiate a new stream directly to the requested origin and resend the request. Note, SPDY does not allow 1324 the server to request different client authentication for different resources in the same origin. 1325 </p> 1326 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.9">If the server receives an invalid CREDENTIAL frame, it MUST respond with a GOAWAY frame and shutdown the session.</p> 1327 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.10"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.10">2.6.10</a> <a id="HeaderBlock" href="#HeaderBlock">Name/Value Header Block</a></h3> 1328 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.1">The Name/Value Header Block is found in the SYN_STREAM, SYN_REPLY and HEADERS control frames, and shares a common format:</p> 1329 <div id="rfc.figure.u.12"></div> <pre>+------------------------------------+ 1346 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.5">Slot: The index in the server's client certificate vector where this certificate should be stored. If there is already a certificate 1347 stored at this index, it will be overwritten. The index is one based, not zero based; zero is an invalid slot index. 1348 </p> 1349 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.6">Proof: Cryptographic proof that the client has possession of the private key associated with the certificate. The format is 1350 a TLS digitally-signed element (<a href="#RFC5246" id="rfc.xref.RFC5246.1"><cite title="The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2">[RFC5246]</cite></a>, <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246#section-4.7">Section 4.7</a>). The signature algorithm must be the same as that used in the CertificateVerify message. However, since the MD5+SHA1 signature 1351 type used in TLS 1.0 connections can not be correctly encoded in a digitally-signed element, SHA1 must be used when MD5+SHA1 1352 was used in the SSL connection. The signature is calculated over a 32 byte TLS extractor value (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5705) 1353 with a label of "EXPORTER SPDY certificate proof" using the empty string as context. ForRSA certificates the signature would 1354 be a PKCS#1 v1.5 signature. For ECDSA, it would be an ECDSA-Sig-Value (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5480#appendix-A). For 1355 a 1024-bit RSA key, the CREDENTIAL message would be ~500 bytes. 1356 </p> 1357 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.7">Certificate: The certificate chain, starting with the leaf certificate. Each certificate must be encoded as a 32 bit length, 1358 followed by a DER encoded certificate. The certificate must be of the same type (RSA, ECDSA, etc) as the client certificate 1359 associated with the SSL connection. 1360 </p> 1361 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.8">If the server receives a request for a resource with unacceptable credential (either missing or invalid), it must reply with 1362 a RST_STREAM frame with the status code INVALID_CREDENTIALS. Upon receipt of a RST_STREAM frame with INVALID_CREDENTIALS, 1363 the client should initiate a new stream directly to the requested origin and resend the request. Note, SPDY does not allow 1364 the server to request different client authentication for different resources in the same origin. 1365 </p> 1366 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.9.p.9">If the server receives an invalid CREDENTIAL frame, it MUST respond with a GOAWAY frame and shutdown the session.</p> 1367 </div> 1368 <div id="HeaderBlock"> 1369 <h3 id="rfc.section.2.6.10"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.10">2.6.10</a> <a href="#HeaderBlock">Name/Value Header Block</a></h3> 1370 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.1">The Name/Value Header Block is found in the SYN_STREAM, SYN_REPLY and HEADERS control frames, and shares a common format:</p> 1371 <div id="rfc.figure.u.12"></div><pre>+------------------------------------+ 1330 1372 | Number of Name/Value pairs (int32) | 1331 1373 +------------------------------------+ … … 1339 1381 +------------------------------------+ 1340 1382 | (repeats) | 1341 </pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.3">Number of Name/Value pairs: The number of repeating name/value pairs following this field.</p> 1342 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.4">List of Name/Value pairs: </p> 1343 <ul class="empty"> 1344 <li>Length of Name: a 32-bit value containing the number of octets in the name field. Note that in practice, this length must 1345 not exceed 2^24, as that is the maximum size of a SPDY frame. 1346 </li> 1347 <li>Name: 0 or more octets, 8-bit sequences of data, excluding 0.</li> 1348 <li>Length of Value: a 32-bit value containing the number of octets in the value field. Note that in practice, this length must 1349 not exceed 2^24, as that is the maximum size of a SPDY frame. 1350 </li> 1351 <li>Value: 0 or more octets, 8-bit sequences of data, excluding 0.</li> 1352 </ul> 1353 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.5">Each header name must have at least one value. Header names are encoded using the <a href="#ASCII">US-ASCII character set</a> <cite title="US-ASCII. Coded Character Set - 7-Bit American Standard Code for Information Interchange. Standard ANSI X3.4-1986, ANSI, 1986." id="rfc.xref.ASCII.1">[ASCII]</cite> and must be all lower case. The length of each name must be greater than zero. A recipient of a zero-length name MUST issue 1354 a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR for the stream-id. 1355 </p> 1356 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.6">Duplicate header names are not allowed. To send two identically named headers, send a header with two values, where the values 1357 are separated by a single NUL (0) byte. A header value can either be empty (e.g. the length is zero) or it can contain multiple, 1358 NUL-separated values, each with length greater than zero. The value never starts nor ends with a NUL character. Recipients 1359 of illegal value fields MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR for the stream-id. 1360 </p> 1361 <h4 id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.10.1">2.6.10.1</a> <a id="Compression" href="#Compression">Compression</a></h4> 1362 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1.p.1">The Name/Value Header Block is a section of the SYN_STREAM, SYN_REPLY, and HEADERS frames used to carry header meta-data. 1363 This block is always compressed using zlib compression. Within this specification, any reference to 'zlib' is referring to 1364 the <a href="#RFC1950">ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification Version 3.3 as part of RFC1950.</a> <cite title="ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3" id="rfc.xref.RFC1950.1">[RFC1950]</cite></p> 1365 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1.p.2">For each HEADERS compression instance, the initial state is initialized using the following <a href="#UDELCOMPRESSION">dictionary</a> <cite title="A Methodology to Derive SPDY's Initial Dictionary for Zlib Compression" id="rfc.xref.UDELCOMPRESSION.1">[UDELCOMPRESSION]</cite>: 1366 </p> 1367 <div id="rfc.figure.u.13"></div> <pre class="ccmarker cct"><span><CODE BEGINS></span></pre><pre class="text">const unsigned char SPDY_dictionary_txt[] = { 1383 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.3">Number of Name/Value pairs: The number of repeating name/value pairs following this field.</p> 1384 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.4">List of Name/Value pairs: </p> 1385 <ul class="empty"> 1386 <li>Length of Name: a 32-bit value containing the number of octets in the name field. Note that in practice, this length must 1387 not exceed 2^24, as that is the maximum size of a SPDY frame. 1388 </li> 1389 <li>Name: 0 or more octets, 8-bit sequences of data, excluding 0.</li> 1390 <li>Length of Value: a 32-bit value containing the number of octets in the value field. Note that in practice, this length must 1391 not exceed 2^24, as that is the maximum size of a SPDY frame. 1392 </li> 1393 <li>Value: 0 or more octets, 8-bit sequences of data, excluding 0.</li> 1394 </ul> 1395 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.5">Each header name must have at least one value. Header names are encoded using the <a href="#ASCII">US-ASCII character set</a> <cite title="US-ASCII. Coded Character Set - 7-Bit American Standard Code for Information Interchange. Standard ANSI X3.4-1986, ANSI, 1986." id="rfc.xref.ASCII.1">[ASCII]</cite> and must be all lower case. The length of each name must be greater than zero. A recipient of a zero-length name MUST issue 1396 a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR for the stream-id. 1397 </p> 1398 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.p.6">Duplicate header names are not allowed. To send two identically named headers, send a header with two values, where the values 1399 are separated by a single NUL (0) byte. A header value can either be empty (e.g. the length is zero) or it can contain multiple, 1400 NUL-separated values, each with length greater than zero. The value never starts nor ends with a NUL character. Recipients 1401 of illegal value fields MUST issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR for the stream-id. 1402 </p> 1403 <div id="Compression"> 1404 <h4 id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.6.10.1">2.6.10.1</a> <a href="#Compression">Compression</a></h4> 1405 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1.p.1">The Name/Value Header Block is a section of the SYN_STREAM, SYN_REPLY, and HEADERS frames used to carry header meta-data. 1406 This block is always compressed using zlib compression. Within this specification, any reference to 'zlib' is referring to 1407 the <a href="#RFC1950">ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification Version 3.3 as part of RFC1950.</a> <cite title="ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3" id="rfc.xref.RFC1950.1">[RFC1950]</cite></p> 1408 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1.p.2">For each HEADERS compression instance, the initial state is initialized using the following <a href="#UDELCOMPRESSION">dictionary</a> <cite title="A Methodology to Derive SPDY's Initial Dictionary for Zlib Compression" id="rfc.xref.UDELCOMPRESSION.1">[UDELCOMPRESSION]</cite>: 1409 </p> 1410 <div id="rfc.figure.u.13"></div><pre class="text">const unsigned char SPDY_dictionary_txt[] = { 1368 1411 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x07, 0x6f, 0x70, 0x74, 0x69, \\ - - - - o p t i 1369 1412 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x68, \\ o n s - - - - h … … 1545 1588 0x2c, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x71, 0x3d, 0x30, 0x2e \\ - e n q - 0 - 1546 1589 }; 1547 </pre><pre class="ccmarker ccb"><span><CODE ENDS></span></pre> <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1.p.4">The entire contents of the name/value header block is compressed using zlib. There is a single zlib stream for all name value 1548 pairs in one direction on a connection. SPDY uses a SYNC_FLUSH between each compressed frame. 1549 </p> 1550 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1.p.5">Implementation notes: the compression engine can be tuned to favor speed or size. Optimizing for size increases memory use 1551 and CPU consumption. Because header blocks are generally small, implementors may want to reduce the window-size of the compression 1552 engine from the default 15bits (a 32KB window) to more like 11bits (a 2KB window). The exact setting is chosen by the compressor, 1553 the decompressor will work with any setting. 1554 </p> 1555 <h1 id="rfc.section.3"><a href="#rfc.section.3">3.</a> <a id="HTTPLayer" href="#HTTPLayer">HTTP Layering over SPDY</a></h1> 1556 <p id="rfc.section.3.p.1">SPDY is intended to be as compatible as possible with current web-based applications. This means that, from the perspective 1557 of the server business logic or application API, the features of HTTP are unchanged. To achieve this, all of the application 1558 request and response header semantics are preserved, although the syntax of conveying those semantics has changed. Thus, the 1559 rules from the <a href="#RFC2616">HTTP/1.1 specification in RFC2616</a> <cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">[RFC2616]</cite> apply with the changes in the sections below. 1560 </p> 1561 <h2 id="rfc.section.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.1">3.1</a> Connection Management 1562 </h2> 1563 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.1">Clients SHOULD NOT open more than one SPDY session to a given <a href="#RFC6454">origin</a> <cite title="The Web Origin Concept" id="rfc.xref.RFC6454.2">[RFC6454]</cite> concurrently. 1564 </p> 1565 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.2">Note that it is possible for one SPDY session to be finishing (e.g. a GOAWAY message has been sent, but not all streams have 1566 finished), while another SPDY session is starting. 1567 </p> 1568 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.1.1">3.1.1</a> Use of GOAWAY 1569 </h3> 1570 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.1">SPDY provides a GOAWAY message which can be used when closing a connection from either the client or server. Without a server 1571 GOAWAY message, HTTP has a race condition where the client sends a request (a new SYN_STREAM) just as the server is closing 1572 the connection, and the client cannot know if the server received the stream or not. By using the last-stream-id in the GOAWAY, 1573 servers can indicate to the client if a request was processed or not. 1574 </p> 1575 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.2">Note that some servers will choose to send the GOAWAY and immediately terminate the connection without waiting for active 1576 streams to finish. The client will be able to determine this because SPDY streams are determinstically closed. This abrupt 1577 termination will force the client to heuristically decide whether to retry the pending requests. Clients always need to be 1578 capable of dealing with this case because they must deal with accidental connection termination cases, which are the same 1579 as the server never having sent a GOAWAY. 1580 </p> 1581 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.3">More sophisticated servers will use GOAWAY to implement a graceful teardown. They will send the GOAWAY and provide some time 1582 for the active streams to finish before terminating the connection. 1583 </p> 1584 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.4">If a SPDY client closes the connection, it should also send a GOAWAY message. This allows the server to know if any server-push 1585 streams were received by the client. 1586 </p> 1587 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.5">If the endpoint closing the connection has not received any SYN_STREAMs from the remote, the GOAWAY will contain a last-stream-id 1588 of 0. 1589 </p> 1590 <h2 id="rfc.section.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2">3.2</a> HTTP Request/Response 1591 </h2> 1592 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.1">3.2.1</a> Request 1593 </h3> 1594 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.1.p.1">The client initiates a request by sending a SYN_STREAM frame. For requests which do not contain a body, the SYN_STREAM frame 1595 MUST set the FLAG_FIN, indicating that the client intends to send no further data on this stream. For requests which do contain 1596 a body, the SYN_STREAM will not contain the FLAG_FIN, and the body will follow the SYN_STREAM in a series of DATA frames. 1597 The last DATA frame will set the FLAG_FIN to indicate the end of the body. 1598 </p> 1599 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.1.p.2">The SYN_STREAM Name/Value section will contain all of the HTTP headers which are associated with an HTTP request. The header 1600 block in SPDY is mostly unchanged from today's HTTP header block, with the following differences: 1601 </p> 1602 <ul class="empty"> 1603 <li>The first line of the request is unfolded into name/value pairs like other HTTP headers and MUST be present: 1604 <ul class="empty"> 1605 <li>":method" - the HTTP method for this request (e.g. "GET", "POST", "HEAD", etc)</li> 1606 <li>":path" - the url-path for this url with "/" prefixed. (See <a href="#RFC1738">RFC1738</a> <cite title="Uniform Resource Locators (URL)" id="rfc.xref.RFC1738.1">[RFC1738]</cite>). For example, for "http://www.google.com/search?q=dogs" the path would be "/search?q=dogs". 1607 </li> 1608 <li>":version" - the HTTP version of this request (e.g. "HTTP/1.1")</li> 1609 </ul> 1610 </li> 1611 <li>In addition, the following two name/value pairs must also be present in every request: 1612 <ul class="empty"> 1613 <li>":host" - the hostport (See <a href="#RFC1738">RFC1738</a> <cite title="Uniform Resource Locators (URL)" id="rfc.xref.RFC1738.2">[RFC1738]</cite>) portion of the URL for this request (e.g. "www.google.com:1234"). This header is the same as the HTTP 'Host' header. 1614 </li> 1615 <li>":scheme" - the scheme portion of the URL for this request (e.g. "https"))</li> 1616 </ul> 1617 </li> 1618 <li>Header names are all lowercase.</li> 1619 <li>The Connection, Host, Keep-Alive, Proxy-Connection, and Transfer-Encoding headers are not valid and MUST not be sent.</li> 1620 <li>User-agents MUST support gzip compression. Regardless of the Accept-Encoding sent by the user-agent, the server may always 1621 send content encoded with gzip or deflate encoding. 1622 </li> 1623 <li>If a server receives a request where the sum of the data frame payload lengths does not equal the size of the Content-Length 1624 header, the server MUST return a 400 (Bad Request) error. 1625 </li> 1626 <li>POST-specific changes: 1627 <ul class="empty"> 1628 <li>Although POSTs are inherently chunked, POST requests SHOULD also be accompanied by a Content-Length header. There are two 1629 reasons for this: First, it assists with upload progress meters for an improved user experience. But second, we know from 1630 early versions of SPDY that failure to send a content length header is incompatible with many existing HTTP server implementations. 1631 Existing user-agents do not omit the Content-Length header, and server implementations have come to depend upon this. 1632 </li> 1633 </ul> 1634 </li> 1635 </ul> 1636 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.1.p.3">The user-agent is free to prioritize requests as it sees fit. If the user-agent cannot make progress without receiving a resource, 1637 it should attempt to raise the priority of that resource. Resources such as images, SHOULD generally use the lowest priority. 1638 </p> 1639 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.1.p.4">If a client sends a SYN_STREAM without all of the method, host, path, scheme, and version headers, the server MUST reply with 1640 a HTTP 400 Bad Request reply. 1641 </p> 1642 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.2">3.2.2</a> Response 1643 </h3> 1644 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.2.p.1">The server responds to a client request with a SYN_REPLY frame. Symmetric to the client's upload stream, server will send 1645 data after the SYN_REPLY frame via a series of DATA frames, and the last data frame will contain the FLAG_FIN to indicate 1646 successful end-of-stream. If a response (like a 202 or 204 response) contains no body, the SYN_REPLY frame may contain the 1647 FLAG_FIN flag to indicate no further data will be sent on the stream. 1648 </p> 1649 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.2.p.2"> </p> 1650 <ul class="empty"> 1651 <li>The response status line is unfolded into name/value pairs like other HTTP headers and must be present: 1652 <ul class="empty"> 1653 <li>":status" - The HTTP response status code (e.g. "200" or "200 OK")</li> 1654 <li>":version" - The HTTP response version (e.g. "HTTP/1.1")</li> 1655 </ul> 1656 </li> 1657 <li>All header names must be lowercase.</li> 1658 <li>The Connection, Keep-Alive, Proxy-Connection, and Transfer-Encoding headers are not valid and MUST not be sent.</li> 1659 <li>Responses MAY be accompanied by a Content-Length header for advisory purposes. (e.g. for UI progress meters)</li> 1660 <li>If a client receives a response where the sum of the data frame payload lengths does not equal the size of the Content-Length 1661 header, the client MUST ignore the content length header. 1662 </li> 1663 </ul> 1664 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.2.p.3">If a client receives a SYN_REPLY without a status or without a version header, the client must reply with a RST_STREAM frame 1665 indicating a PROTOCOL ERROR. 1666 </p> 1667 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.2.3"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3">3.2.3</a> <a id="Authentication" href="#Authentication">Authentication</a></h3> 1668 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.p.1">When a client sends a request to an origin server that requires authentication, the server can reply with a "401 Unauthorized" 1669 response, and include a WWW-Authenticate challenge header that defines the authentication scheme to be used. The client then 1670 retries the request with an Authorization header appropriate to the specified authentication scheme. 1671 </p> 1672 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.p.2">There are four options for proxy authentication, Basic, Digest, NTLM and Negotiate (SPNEGO). The first two options were defined 1673 in <a href="#RFC2617">RFC2617</a> <cite title="HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication" id="rfc.xref.RFC2617.1">[RFC2617]</cite>, and are stateless. The second two options were developed by Microsoft and specified in <a href="#RFC4559">RFC4559</a> <cite title="SPNEGO-based Kerberos and NTLM HTTP Authentication in Microsoft Windows" id="rfc.xref.RFC4559.1">[RFC4559]</cite>, and are stateful; otherwise known as multi-round authentication, or connection authentication. 1674 </p> 1675 <h4 id="rfc.section.3.2.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3.1">3.2.3.1</a> Stateless Authentication 1676 </h4> 1677 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.1.p.1">Stateless Authentication over SPDY is identical to how it is performed over HTTP. If multiple SPDY streams are concurrently 1678 sent to a single server, each will authenticate independently, similar to how two HTTP connections would independently authenticate 1679 to a proxy server. 1680 </p> 1681 <h4 id="rfc.section.3.2.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3.2">3.2.3.2</a> Stateful Authentication 1682 </h4> 1683 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.2.p.1">Unfortunately, the stateful authentication mechanisms were implemented and defined in a such a way that directly violates 1684 RFC2617 - they do not include a "realm" as part of the request. This is problematic in SPDY because it makes it impossible 1685 for a client to disambiguate two concurrent server authentication challenges. 1686 </p> 1687 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.2.p.2">To deal with this case, SPDY servers using Stateful Authentication MUST implement one of two changes: </p> 1688 <ul class="empty"> 1689 <li>Servers can add a "realm=<desired realm>" header so that the two authentication requests can be disambiguated and run concurrently. 1690 Unfortunately, given how these mechanisms work, this is probably not practical. 1691 </li> 1692 <li>Upon sending the first stateful challenge response, the server MUST buffer and defer all further frames which are not part 1693 of completing the challenge until the challenge has completed. Completing the authentication challenge may take multiple round 1694 trips. Once the client receives a "401 Authenticate" response for a stateful authentication type, it MUST stop sending new 1695 requests to the server until the authentication has completed by receiving a non-401 response on at least one stream. 1696 </li> 1697 </ul> 1698 <h2 id="rfc.section.3.3"><a href="#rfc.section.3.3">3.3</a> Server Push Transactions 1699 </h2> 1700 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.1">SPDY enables a server to send multiple replies to a client for a single request. The rationale for this feature is that sometimes 1701 a server knows that it will need to send multiple resources in response to a single request. Without server push features, 1702 the client must first download the primary resource, then discover the secondary resource(s), and request them. Pushing of 1703 resources avoids the round-trip delay, but also creates a potential race where a server can be pushing content which a user-agent 1704 is in the process of requesting. The following mechanics attempt to prevent the race condition while enabling the performance 1705 benefit. 1706 </p> 1707 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.2">Browsers receiving a pushed response MUST validate that the server is authorized to push the URL using the <a href="#RFC6454">browser same-origin</a> <cite title="The Web Origin Concept" id="rfc.xref.RFC6454.3">[RFC6454]</cite> policy. For example, a SPDY connection to www.foo.com is generally not permitted to push a response for www.evil.com. 1708 </p> 1709 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.3">If the browser accepts a pushed response (e.g. it does not send a RST_STREAM), the browser MUST attempt to cache the pushed 1710 response in same way that it would cache any other response. This means validating the response headers and inserting into 1711 the disk cache. 1712 </p> 1713 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.4">Because pushed responses have no request, they have no request headers associated with them. At the framing layer, SPDY pushed 1714 streams contain an "associated-stream-id" which indicates the requested stream for which the pushed stream is related. The 1715 pushed stream inherits all of the headers from the associated-stream-id with the exception of ":host", ":scheme", and ":path", 1716 which are provided as part of the pushed response stream headers. The browser MUST store these inherited and implied request 1717 headers with the cached resource. 1718 </p> 1719 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.5">Implementation note: With server push, it is theoretically possible for servers to push unreasonable amounts of content or 1720 resources to the user-agent. Browsers MUST implement throttles to protect against unreasonable push attacks. 1721 </p> 1722 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.3.1">3.3.1</a> Server implementation 1723 </h3> 1724 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.1">When the server intends to push a resource to the user-agent, it opens a new stream by sending a unidirectional SYN_STREAM. 1725 The SYN_STREAM MUST include an Associated-To-Stream-ID, and MUST set the FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL flag. The SYN_STREAM MUST include 1726 headers for ":scheme", ":host", ":path", which represent the URL for the resource being pushed. Subsequent headers may follow 1727 in HEADERS frames. The purpose of the association is so that the user-agent can differentiate which request induced the pushed 1728 stream; without it, if the user-agent had two tabs open to the same page, each pushing unique content under a fixed URL, the 1729 user-agent would not be able to differentiate the requests. 1730 </p> 1731 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.2">The Associated-To-Stream-ID must be the ID of an existing, open stream. The reason for this restriction is to have a clear 1732 endpoint for pushed content. If the user-agent requested a resource on stream 11, the server replies on stream 11. It can 1733 push any number of additional streams to the client before sending a FLAG_FIN on stream 11. However, once the originating 1734 stream is closed no further push streams may be associated with it. The pushed streams do not need to be closed (FIN set) 1735 before the originating stream is closed, they only need to be created before the originating stream closes. 1736 </p> 1737 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.3">It is illegal for a server to push a resource with the Associated-To-Stream-ID of 0.</p> 1738 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.4">To minimize race conditions with the client, the SYN_STREAM for the pushed resources MUST be sent prior to sending any content 1739 which could allow the client to discover the pushed resource and request it. 1740 </p> 1741 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.5">The server MUST only push resources which would have been returned from a GET request.</p> 1742 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.6">Note: If the server does not have all of the Name/Value Response headers available at the time it issues the HEADERS frame 1743 for the pushed resource, it may later use an additional HEADERS frame to augment the name/value pairs to be associated with 1744 the pushed stream. The subsequent HEADERS frame(s) must not contain a header for ':host', ':scheme', or ':path' (e.g. the 1745 server can't change the identity of the resource to be pushed). The HEADERS frame must not contain duplicate headers with 1746 a previously sent HEADERS frame. The server must send a HEADERS frame including the scheme/host/port headers before sending 1747 any data frames on the stream. 1748 </p> 1749 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.3.2">3.3.2</a> Client implementation 1750 </h3> 1751 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.1">When fetching a resource the client has 3 possibilities: </p> 1752 <ul class="empty"> 1753 <li>the resource is not being pushed</li> 1754 <li>the resource is being pushed, but the data has not yet arrived</li> 1755 <li>the resource is being pushed, and the data has started to arrive</li> 1756 </ul> 1757 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.2">When a SYN_STREAM and HEADERS frame which contains an Associated-To-Stream-ID is received, the client must not issue GET requests 1758 for the resource in the pushed stream, and instead wait for the pushed stream to arrive. 1759 </p> 1760 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.3">If a client receives a server push stream with stream-id 0, it MUST issue a session error (<a href="#SessionErrorHandler" title="Session Error Handling">Section 2.4.1</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR. 1761 </p> 1762 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.4">When a client receives a SYN_STREAM from the server without a the ':host', ':scheme', and ':path' headers in the Name/Value 1763 section, it MUST reply with a RST_STREAM with error code HTTP_PROTOCOL_ERROR. 1764 </p> 1765 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.5">To cancel individual server push streams, the client can issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with error code CANCEL. Upon receipt, the server MUST stop sending on this stream immediately (this is an Abrupt termination). 1766 </p> 1767 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.6">To cancel all server push streams related to a request, the client may issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with error code CANCEL on the associated-stream-id. By cancelling that stream, the server MUST immediately stop sending frames 1768 for any streams with in-association-to for the original stream. 1769 </p> 1770 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.7">If the server sends a HEADER frame containing duplicate headers with a previous HEADERS frame for the same stream, the client 1771 must issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with error code PROTOCOL ERROR. 1772 </p> 1773 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.8">If the server sends a HEADERS frame after sending a data frame for the same stream, the client MAY ignore the HEADERS frame. 1774 Ignoring the HEADERS frame after a data frame prevents handling of HTTP's trailing headers (http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.40). 1775 </p> 1776 <h1 id="rfc.section.4"><a href="#rfc.section.4">4.</a> Design Rationale and Notes 1777 </h1> 1778 <p id="rfc.section.4.p.1">Authors' notes: The notes in this section have no bearing on the SPDY protocol as specified within this document, and none 1779 of these notes should be considered authoritative about how the protocol works. However, these notes may prove useful in future 1780 debates about how to resolve protocol ambiguities or how to evolve the protocol going forward. They may be removed before 1781 the final draft. 1782 </p> 1783 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.1"><a href="#rfc.section.4.1">4.1</a> Separation of Framing Layer and Application Layer 1784 </h2> 1785 <p id="rfc.section.4.1.p.1">Readers may note that this specification sometimes blends the framing layer (<a href="#FramingLayer" title="SPDY Framing Layer">Section 2</a>) with requirements of a specific application - HTTP (<a href="#HTTPLayer" title="HTTP Layering over SPDY">Section 3</a>). This is reflected in the request/response nature of the streams, the definition of the HEADERS and compression contexts 1786 which are very similar to HTTP, and other areas as well. 1787 </p> 1788 <p id="rfc.section.4.1.p.2">This blending is intentional - the primary goal of this protocol is to create a low-latency protocol for use with HTTP. Isolating 1789 the two layers is convenient for description of the protocol and how it relates to existing HTTP implementations. However, 1790 the ability to reuse the SPDY framing layer is a non goal. 1791 </p> 1792 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.2"><a href="#rfc.section.4.2">4.2</a> Error handling - Framing Layer 1793 </h2> 1794 <p id="rfc.section.4.2.p.1">Error handling at the SPDY layer splits errors into two groups: Those that affect an individual SPDY stream, and those that 1795 do not. 1796 </p> 1797 <p id="rfc.section.4.2.p.2">When an error is confined to a single stream, but general framing is in tact, SPDY attempts to use the RST_STREAM as a mechanism 1798 to invalidate the stream but move forward without aborting the connection altogether. 1799 </p> 1800 <p id="rfc.section.4.2.p.3">For errors occuring outside of a single stream context, SPDY assumes the entire session is hosed. In this case, the endpoint 1801 detecting the error should initiate a connection close. 1802 </p> 1803 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.3"><a href="#rfc.section.4.3">4.3</a> One Connection Per Domain 1804 </h2> 1805 <p id="rfc.section.4.3.p.1">SPDY attempts to use fewer connections than other protocols have traditionally used. The rationale for this behavior is because 1806 it is very difficult to provide a consistent level of service (e.g. TCP slow-start), prioritization, or optimal compression 1807 when the client is connecting to the server through multiple channels. 1808 </p> 1809 <p id="rfc.section.4.3.p.2">Through lab measurements, we have seen consistent latency benefits by using fewer connections from the client. The overall 1810 number of packets sent by SPDY can be as much as 40% less than HTTP. Handling large numbers of concurrent connections on the 1811 server also does become a scalability problem, and SPDY reduces this load. 1812 </p> 1813 <p id="rfc.section.4.3.p.3">The use of multiple connections is not without benefit, however. Because SPDY multiplexes multiple, independent streams onto 1814 a single stream, it creates a potential for head-of-line blocking problems at the transport level. In tests so far, the negative 1815 effects of head-of-line blocking (especially in the presence of packet loss) is outweighed by the benefits of compression 1816 and prioritization. 1817 </p> 1818 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.4"><a href="#rfc.section.4.4">4.4</a> Fixed vs Variable Length Fields 1819 </h2> 1820 <p id="rfc.section.4.4.p.1">SPDY favors use of fixed length 32bit fields in cases where smaller, variable length encodings could have been used. To some, 1821 this seems like a tragic waste of bandwidth. SPDY choses the simple encoding for speed and simplicity. 1822 </p> 1823 <p id="rfc.section.4.4.p.2">The goal of SPDY is to reduce latency on the network. The overhead of SPDY frames is generally quite low. Each data frame 1824 is only an 8 byte overhead for a 1452 byte payload (~0.6%). At the time of this writing, bandwidth is already plentiful, and 1825 there is a strong trend indicating that bandwidth will continue to increase. With an average worldwide bandwidth of 1Mbps, 1826 and assuming that a variable length encoding could reduce the overhead by 50%, the latency saved by using a variable length 1827 encoding would be less than 100 nanoseconds. More interesting are the effects when the larger encodings force a packet boundary, 1828 in which case a round-trip could be induced. However, by addressing other aspects of SPDY and TCP interactions, we believe 1829 this is completely mitigated. 1830 </p> 1831 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.5"><a href="#rfc.section.4.5">4.5</a> Compression Context(s) 1832 </h2> 1833 <p id="rfc.section.4.5.p.1">When isolating the compression contexts used for communicating with multiple origins, we had a few choices to make. We could 1834 have maintained a map (or list) of compression contexts usable for each origin. The basic case is easy - each HEADERS frame 1835 would need to identify the context to use for that frame. However, compression contexts are not cheap, so the lifecycle of 1836 each context would need to be bounded. For proxy servers, where we could churn through many contexts, this would be a concern. 1837 We considered using a static set of contexts, say 16 of them, which would bound the memory use. We also considered dynamic 1838 contexts, which could be created on the fly, and would need to be subsequently destroyed. All of these are complicated, and 1839 ultimately we decided that such a mechanism creates too many problems to solve. 1840 </p> 1841 <p id="rfc.section.4.5.p.2">Alternatively, we've chosen the simple approach, which is to simply provide a flag for resetting the compression context. 1842 For the common case (no proxy), this fine because most requests are to the same origin and we never need to reset the context. 1843 For cases where we are using two different origins over a single SPDY session, we simply reset the compression state between 1844 each transition. 1845 </p> 1846 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.6"><a href="#rfc.section.4.6">4.6</a> Unidirectional streams 1847 </h2> 1848 <p id="rfc.section.4.6.p.1">Many readers notice that unidirectional streams are both a bit confusing in concept and also somewhat redundant. If the recipient 1849 of a stream doesn't wish to send data on a stream, it could simply send a SYN_REPLY with the FLAG_FIN bit set. The FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL 1850 is, therefore, not necessary. 1851 </p> 1852 <p id="rfc.section.4.6.p.2">It is true that we don't need the UNIDIRECTIONAL markings. It is added because it avoids the recipient of pushed streams from 1853 needing to send a set of empty frames (e.g. the SYN_STREAM w/ FLAG_FIN) which otherwise serve no purpose. 1854 </p> 1855 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.7"><a href="#rfc.section.4.7">4.7</a> Data Compression 1856 </h2> 1857 <p id="rfc.section.4.7.p.1">Generic compression of data portion of the streams (as opposed to compression of the headers) without knowing the content 1858 of the stream is redundant. There is no value in compressing a stream which is already compressed. Because of this, SPDY does 1859 allow data compression to be optional. We included it because study of existing websites shows that many sites are not using 1860 compression as they should, and users suffer because of it. We wanted a mechanism where, at the SPDY layer, site administrators 1861 could simply force compression - it is better to compress twice than to not compress. 1862 </p> 1863 <p id="rfc.section.4.7.p.2">Overall, however, with this feature being optional and sometimes redundant, it is unclear if it is useful at all. We will 1864 likely remove it from the specification. 1865 </p> 1866 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.8"><a href="#rfc.section.4.8">4.8</a> Server Push 1867 </h2> 1868 <p id="rfc.section.4.8.p.1">A subtle but important point is that server push streams must be declared before the associated stream is closed. The reason 1869 for this is so that proxies have a lifetime for which they can discard information about previous streams. If a pushed stream 1870 could associate itself with an already-closed stream, then endpoints would not have a specific lifecycle for when they could 1871 disavow knowledge of the streams which went before. 1872 </p> 1873 <h1 id="rfc.section.5"><a href="#rfc.section.5">5.</a> Security Considerations 1874 </h1> 1875 <h2 id="rfc.section.5.1"><a href="#rfc.section.5.1">5.1</a> Use of Same-origin constraints 1876 </h2> 1877 <p id="rfc.section.5.1.p.1">This specification uses the <a href="#RFC6454">same-origin policy</a> <cite title="The Web Origin Concept" id="rfc.xref.RFC6454.4">[RFC6454]</cite> in all cases where verification of content is required. 1878 </p> 1879 <h2 id="rfc.section.5.2"><a href="#rfc.section.5.2">5.2</a> HTTP Headers and SPDY Headers 1880 </h2> 1881 <p id="rfc.section.5.2.p.1">At the application level, HTTP uses name/value pairs in its headers. Because SPDY merges the existing HTTP headers with SPDY 1882 headers, there is a possibility that some HTTP applications already use a particular header name. To avoid any conflicts, 1883 all headers introduced for layering HTTP over SPDY are prefixed with ":". ":" is not a valid sequence in HTTP header naming, 1884 preventing any possible conflict. 1885 </p> 1886 <h2 id="rfc.section.5.3"><a href="#rfc.section.5.3">5.3</a> Cross-Protocol Attacks 1887 </h2> 1888 <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.1">By utilizing TLS, we believe that SPDY introduces no new cross-protocol attacks. TLS encrypts the contents of all transmission 1889 (except the handshake itself), making it difficult for attackers to control the data which could be used in a cross-protocol 1890 attack. 1891 </p> 1892 <h2 id="rfc.section.5.4"><a href="#rfc.section.5.4">5.4</a> Server Push Implicit Headers 1893 </h2> 1894 <p id="rfc.section.5.4.p.1">Pushed resources do not have an associated request. In order for existing HTTP cache control validations (such as the Vary 1895 header) to work, however, all cached resources must have a set of request headers. For this reason, browsers MUST be careful 1896 to inherit request headers from the associated stream for the push. This includes the 'Cookie' header. 1897 </p> 1898 <h1 id="rfc.section.6"><a href="#rfc.section.6">6.</a> Privacy Considerations 1899 </h1> 1900 <h2 id="rfc.section.6.1"><a href="#rfc.section.6.1">6.1</a> Long Lived Connections 1901 </h2> 1902 <p id="rfc.section.6.1.p.1">SPDY aims to keep connections open longer between clients and servers in order to reduce the latency when a user makes a request. 1903 The maintenance of these connections over time could be used to expose private information. For example, a user using a browser 1904 hours after the previous user stopped using that browser may be able to learn about what the previous user was doing. This 1905 is a problem with HTTP in its current form as well, however the short lived connections make it less of a risk. 1906 </p> 1907 <h2 id="rfc.section.6.2"><a href="#rfc.section.6.2">6.2</a> SETTINGS frame 1908 </h2> 1909 <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.1">The SPDY SETTINGS frame allows servers to store out-of-band transmitted information about the communication between client 1910 and server on the client. Although this is intended only to be used to reduce latency, renegade servers could use it as a 1911 mechanism to store identifying information about the client in future requests. 1912 </p> 1913 <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.2">Clients implementing privacy modes, such as Google Chrome's "incognito mode", may wish to disable client-persisted SETTINGS 1914 storage. 1915 </p> 1916 <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.3">Clients MUST clear persisted SETTINGS information when clearing the cookies.</p> 1917 <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.4">TODO: Put range maximums on each type of setting to limit inappropriate uses.</p> 1918 <h1 id="rfc.section.7"><a href="#rfc.section.7">7.</a> Incompatibilities with SPDY draft #2 1919 </h1> 1920 <p id="rfc.section.7.p.1">Here is a list of the major changes between this draft and draft #2. </p> 1921 <ul class="empty"> 1922 <li>Addition of flow control</li> 1923 <li>Increased 16 bit length fields in SYN_STREAM and SYN_REPLY to 32 bits.</li> 1924 <li>Changed definition of compression for DATA frames</li> 1925 <li>Updated compression dictionary</li> 1926 <li>Fixed off-by-one on the compression dictionary for headers</li> 1927 <li>Increased priority field from 2bits to 3bits.</li> 1928 <li>Removed NOOP frame</li> 1929 <li>Split the request "url" into "scheme", "host", and "path"</li> 1930 <li>Added the requirement that POSTs contain content-length.</li> 1931 <li>Removed wasted 16bits of unused space from the end of the SYN_REPLY and HEADERS frames.</li> 1932 <li>Fixed bug: Priorities were described backward (0 was lowest instead of highest).</li> 1933 <li>Fixed bug: Name/Value header counts were duplicated in both the Name Value header block and also the containing frame.</li> 1934 </ul> 1935 <h1 id="rfc.section.8"><a href="#rfc.section.8">8.</a> Requirements Notation 1936 </h1> 1937 <p id="rfc.section.8.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" 1938 in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119">RFC 2119</a> <cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1">[RFC2119]</cite>. 1939 </p> 1940 <h1 id="rfc.section.9"><a href="#rfc.section.9">9.</a> Acknowledgements 1941 </h1> 1942 <p id="rfc.section.9.p.1">Many individuals have contributed to the design and evolution of SPDY: Adam Langley, Wan-Teh Chang, Jim Morrison, Mark Nottingham, 1943 Alyssa Wilk, Costin Manolache, William Chan, Vitaliy Lvin, Joe Chan, Adam Barth, Ryan Hamilton, Gavin Peters, Kent Alstad, 1944 Kevin Lindsay, Paul Amer, Fan Yang, Jonathan Leighton. 1945 </p> 1590 </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1.p.4">The entire contents of the name/value header block is compressed using zlib. There is a single zlib stream for all name value 1591 pairs in one direction on a connection. SPDY uses a SYNC_FLUSH between each compressed frame. 1592 </p> 1593 <p id="rfc.section.2.6.10.1.p.5">Implementation notes: the compression engine can be tuned to favor speed or size. Optimizing for size increases memory use 1594 and CPU consumption. Because header blocks are generally small, implementors may want to reduce the window-size of the compression 1595 engine from the default 15bits (a 32KB window) to more like 11bits (a 2KB window). The exact setting is chosen by the compressor, 1596 the decompressor will work with any setting. 1597 </p> 1598 </div> 1599 </div> 1600 </div> 1601 </div> 1602 <div id="HTTPLayer"> 1603 <h1 id="rfc.section.3"><a href="#rfc.section.3">3.</a> <a href="#HTTPLayer">HTTP Layering over SPDY</a></h1> 1604 <p id="rfc.section.3.p.1">SPDY is intended to be as compatible as possible with current web-based applications. This means that, from the perspective 1605 of the server business logic or application API, the features of HTTP are unchanged. To achieve this, all of the application 1606 request and response header semantics are preserved, although the syntax of conveying those semantics has changed. Thus, the 1607 rules from the <a href="#RFC2616">HTTP/1.1 specification in RFC2616</a> <cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">[RFC2616]</cite> apply with the changes in the sections below. 1608 </p> 1609 <div> 1610 <h2 id="rfc.section.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.1">3.1</a> Connection Management 1611 </h2> 1612 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.1">Clients SHOULD NOT open more than one SPDY session to a given <a href="#RFC6454">origin</a> <cite title="The Web Origin Concept" id="rfc.xref.RFC6454.2">[RFC6454]</cite> concurrently. 1613 </p> 1614 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.2">Note that it is possible for one SPDY session to be finishing (e.g. a GOAWAY message has been sent, but not all streams have 1615 finished), while another SPDY session is starting. 1616 </p> 1617 <div> 1618 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.1.1">3.1.1</a> Use of GOAWAY 1619 </h3> 1620 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.1">SPDY provides a GOAWAY message which can be used when closing a connection from either the client or server. Without a server 1621 GOAWAY message, HTTP has a race condition where the client sends a request (a new SYN_STREAM) just as the server is closing 1622 the connection, and the client cannot know if the server received the stream or not. By using the last-stream-id in the GOAWAY, 1623 servers can indicate to the client if a request was processed or not. 1624 </p> 1625 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.2">Note that some servers will choose to send the GOAWAY and immediately terminate the connection without waiting for active 1626 streams to finish. The client will be able to determine this because SPDY streams are determinstically closed. This abrupt 1627 termination will force the client to heuristically decide whether to retry the pending requests. Clients always need to be 1628 capable of dealing with this case because they must deal with accidental connection termination cases, which are the same 1629 as the server never having sent a GOAWAY. 1630 </p> 1631 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.3">More sophisticated servers will use GOAWAY to implement a graceful teardown. They will send the GOAWAY and provide some time 1632 for the active streams to finish before terminating the connection. 1633 </p> 1634 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.4">If a SPDY client closes the connection, it should also send a GOAWAY message. This allows the server to know if any server-push 1635 streams were received by the client. 1636 </p> 1637 <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.5">If the endpoint closing the connection has not received any SYN_STREAMs from the remote, the GOAWAY will contain a last-stream-id 1638 of 0. 1639 </p> 1640 </div> 1641 </div> 1642 <div> 1643 <h2 id="rfc.section.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2">3.2</a> HTTP Request/Response 1644 </h2> 1645 <div> 1646 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.1">3.2.1</a> Request 1647 </h3> 1648 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.1.p.1">The client initiates a request by sending a SYN_STREAM frame. For requests which do not contain a body, the SYN_STREAM frame 1649 MUST set the FLAG_FIN, indicating that the client intends to send no further data on this stream. For requests which do contain 1650 a body, the SYN_STREAM will not contain the FLAG_FIN, and the body will follow the SYN_STREAM in a series of DATA frames. 1651 The last DATA frame will set the FLAG_FIN to indicate the end of the body. 1652 </p> 1653 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.1.p.2">The SYN_STREAM Name/Value section will contain all of the HTTP headers which are associated with an HTTP request. The header 1654 block in SPDY is mostly unchanged from today's HTTP header block, with the following differences: 1655 </p> 1656 <ul class="empty"> 1657 <li>The first line of the request is unfolded into name/value pairs like other HTTP headers and MUST be present: 1658 <ul class="empty"> 1659 <li>":method" - the HTTP method for this request (e.g. "GET", "POST", "HEAD", etc)</li> 1660 <li>":path" - the url-path for this url with "/" prefixed. (See <a href="#RFC1738">RFC1738</a> <cite title="Uniform Resource Locators (URL)" id="rfc.xref.RFC1738.1">[RFC1738]</cite>). For example, for "http://www.google.com/search?q=dogs" the path would be "/search?q=dogs". 1661 </li> 1662 <li>":version" - the HTTP version of this request (e.g. "HTTP/1.1")</li> 1663 </ul> 1664 </li> 1665 <li>In addition, the following two name/value pairs must also be present in every request: 1666 <ul class="empty"> 1667 <li>":host" - the hostport (See <a href="#RFC1738">RFC1738</a> <cite title="Uniform Resource Locators (URL)" id="rfc.xref.RFC1738.2">[RFC1738]</cite>) portion of the URL for this request (e.g. "www.google.com:1234"). This header is the same as the HTTP 'Host' header. 1668 </li> 1669 <li>":scheme" - the scheme portion of the URL for this request (e.g. "https"))</li> 1670 </ul> 1671 </li> 1672 <li>Header names are all lowercase.</li> 1673 <li>The Connection, Host, Keep-Alive, Proxy-Connection, and Transfer-Encoding headers are not valid and MUST not be sent.</li> 1674 <li>User-agents MUST support gzip compression. Regardless of the Accept-Encoding sent by the user-agent, the server may always 1675 send content encoded with gzip or deflate encoding. 1676 </li> 1677 <li>If a server receives a request where the sum of the data frame payload lengths does not equal the size of the Content-Length 1678 header, the server MUST return a 400 (Bad Request) error. 1679 </li> 1680 <li>POST-specific changes: 1681 <ul class="empty"> 1682 <li>Although POSTs are inherently chunked, POST requests SHOULD also be accompanied by a Content-Length header. There are two 1683 reasons for this: First, it assists with upload progress meters for an improved user experience. But second, we know from 1684 early versions of SPDY that failure to send a content length header is incompatible with many existing HTTP server implementations. 1685 Existing user-agents do not omit the Content-Length header, and server implementations have come to depend upon this. 1686 </li> 1687 </ul> 1688 </li> 1689 </ul> 1690 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.1.p.3">The user-agent is free to prioritize requests as it sees fit. If the user-agent cannot make progress without receiving a resource, 1691 it should attempt to raise the priority of that resource. Resources such as images, SHOULD generally use the lowest priority. 1692 </p> 1693 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.1.p.4">If a client sends a SYN_STREAM without all of the method, host, path, scheme, and version headers, the server MUST reply with 1694 a HTTP 400 Bad Request reply. 1695 </p> 1696 </div> 1697 <div> 1698 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.2">3.2.2</a> Response 1699 </h3> 1700 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.2.p.1">The server responds to a client request with a SYN_REPLY frame. Symmetric to the client's upload stream, server will send 1701 data after the SYN_REPLY frame via a series of DATA frames, and the last data frame will contain the FLAG_FIN to indicate 1702 successful end-of-stream. If a response (like a 202 or 204 response) contains no body, the SYN_REPLY frame may contain the 1703 FLAG_FIN flag to indicate no further data will be sent on the stream. 1704 </p> 1705 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.2.p.2"></p> 1706 <ul class="empty"> 1707 <li>The response status line is unfolded into name/value pairs like other HTTP headers and must be present: 1708 <ul class="empty"> 1709 <li>":status" - The HTTP response status code (e.g. "200" or "200 OK")</li> 1710 <li>":version" - The HTTP response version (e.g. "HTTP/1.1")</li> 1711 </ul> 1712 </li> 1713 <li>All header names must be lowercase.</li> 1714 <li>The Connection, Keep-Alive, Proxy-Connection, and Transfer-Encoding headers are not valid and MUST not be sent.</li> 1715 <li>Responses MAY be accompanied by a Content-Length header for advisory purposes. (e.g. for UI progress meters)</li> 1716 <li>If a client receives a response where the sum of the data frame payload lengths does not equal the size of the Content-Length 1717 header, the client MUST ignore the content length header. 1718 </li> 1719 </ul> 1720 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.2.p.3">If a client receives a SYN_REPLY without a status or without a version header, the client must reply with a RST_STREAM frame 1721 indicating a PROTOCOL ERROR. 1722 </p> 1723 </div> 1724 <div id="Authentication"> 1725 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.2.3"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3">3.2.3</a> <a href="#Authentication">Authentication</a></h3> 1726 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.p.1">When a client sends a request to an origin server that requires authentication, the server can reply with a "401 Unauthorized" 1727 response, and include a WWW-Authenticate challenge header that defines the authentication scheme to be used. The client then 1728 retries the request with an Authorization header appropriate to the specified authentication scheme. 1729 </p> 1730 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.p.2">There are four options for proxy authentication, Basic, Digest, NTLM and Negotiate (SPNEGO). The first two options were defined 1731 in <a href="#RFC2617">RFC2617</a> <cite title="HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication" id="rfc.xref.RFC2617.1">[RFC2617]</cite>, and are stateless. The second two options were developed by Microsoft and specified in <a href="#RFC4559">RFC4559</a> <cite title="SPNEGO-based Kerberos and NTLM HTTP Authentication in Microsoft Windows" id="rfc.xref.RFC4559.1">[RFC4559]</cite>, and are stateful; otherwise known as multi-round authentication, or connection authentication. 1732 </p> 1733 <div> 1734 <h4 id="rfc.section.3.2.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3.1">3.2.3.1</a> Stateless Authentication 1735 </h4> 1736 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.1.p.1">Stateless Authentication over SPDY is identical to how it is performed over HTTP. If multiple SPDY streams are concurrently 1737 sent to a single server, each will authenticate independently, similar to how two HTTP connections would independently authenticate 1738 to a proxy server. 1739 </p> 1740 </div> 1741 <div> 1742 <h4 id="rfc.section.3.2.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2.3.2">3.2.3.2</a> Stateful Authentication 1743 </h4> 1744 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.2.p.1">Unfortunately, the stateful authentication mechanisms were implemented and defined in a such a way that directly violates 1745 RFC2617 - they do not include a "realm" as part of the request. This is problematic in SPDY because it makes it impossible 1746 for a client to disambiguate two concurrent server authentication challenges. 1747 </p> 1748 <p id="rfc.section.3.2.3.2.p.2">To deal with this case, SPDY servers using Stateful Authentication MUST implement one of two changes: </p> 1749 <ul class="empty"> 1750 <li>Servers can add a "realm=<desired realm>" header so that the two authentication requests can be disambiguated and run concurrently. 1751 Unfortunately, given how these mechanisms work, this is probably not practical. 1752 </li> 1753 <li>Upon sending the first stateful challenge response, the server MUST buffer and defer all further frames which are not part 1754 of completing the challenge until the challenge has completed. Completing the authentication challenge may take multiple round 1755 trips. Once the client receives a "401 Authenticate" response for a stateful authentication type, it MUST stop sending new 1756 requests to the server until the authentication has completed by receiving a non-401 response on at least one stream. 1757 </li> 1758 </ul> 1759 </div> 1760 </div> 1761 </div> 1762 <div> 1763 <h2 id="rfc.section.3.3"><a href="#rfc.section.3.3">3.3</a> Server Push Transactions 1764 </h2> 1765 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.1">SPDY enables a server to send multiple replies to a client for a single request. The rationale for this feature is that sometimes 1766 a server knows that it will need to send multiple resources in response to a single request. Without server push features, 1767 the client must first download the primary resource, then discover the secondary resource(s), and request them. Pushing of 1768 resources avoids the round-trip delay, but also creates a potential race where a server can be pushing content which a user-agent 1769 is in the process of requesting. The following mechanics attempt to prevent the race condition while enabling the performance 1770 benefit. 1771 </p> 1772 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.2">Browsers receiving a pushed response MUST validate that the server is authorized to push the URL using the <a href="#RFC6454">browser same-origin</a> <cite title="The Web Origin Concept" id="rfc.xref.RFC6454.3">[RFC6454]</cite> policy. For example, a SPDY connection to www.foo.com is generally not permitted to push a response for www.evil.com. 1773 </p> 1774 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.3">If the browser accepts a pushed response (e.g. it does not send a RST_STREAM), the browser MUST attempt to cache the pushed 1775 response in same way that it would cache any other response. This means validating the response headers and inserting into 1776 the disk cache. 1777 </p> 1778 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.4">Because pushed responses have no request, they have no request headers associated with them. At the framing layer, SPDY pushed 1779 streams contain an "associated-stream-id" which indicates the requested stream for which the pushed stream is related. The 1780 pushed stream inherits all of the headers from the associated-stream-id with the exception of ":host", ":scheme", and ":path", 1781 which are provided as part of the pushed response stream headers. The browser MUST store these inherited and implied request 1782 headers with the cached resource. 1783 </p> 1784 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.p.5">Implementation note: With server push, it is theoretically possible for servers to push unreasonable amounts of content or 1785 resources to the user-agent. Browsers MUST implement throttles to protect against unreasonable push attacks. 1786 </p> 1787 <div> 1788 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.3.1">3.3.1</a> Server implementation 1789 </h3> 1790 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.1">When the server intends to push a resource to the user-agent, it opens a new stream by sending a unidirectional SYN_STREAM. 1791 The SYN_STREAM MUST include an Associated-To-Stream-ID, and MUST set the FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL flag. The SYN_STREAM MUST include 1792 headers for ":scheme", ":host", ":path", which represent the URL for the resource being pushed. Subsequent headers may follow 1793 in HEADERS frames. The purpose of the association is so that the user-agent can differentiate which request induced the pushed 1794 stream; without it, if the user-agent had two tabs open to the same page, each pushing unique content under a fixed URL, the 1795 user-agent would not be able to differentiate the requests. 1796 </p> 1797 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.2">The Associated-To-Stream-ID must be the ID of an existing, open stream. The reason for this restriction is to have a clear 1798 endpoint for pushed content. If the user-agent requested a resource on stream 11, the server replies on stream 11. It can 1799 push any number of additional streams to the client before sending a FLAG_FIN on stream 11. However, once the originating 1800 stream is closed no further push streams may be associated with it. The pushed streams do not need to be closed (FIN set) 1801 before the originating stream is closed, they only need to be created before the originating stream closes. 1802 </p> 1803 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.3">It is illegal for a server to push a resource with the Associated-To-Stream-ID of 0.</p> 1804 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.4">To minimize race conditions with the client, the SYN_STREAM for the pushed resources MUST be sent prior to sending any content 1805 which could allow the client to discover the pushed resource and request it. 1806 </p> 1807 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.5">The server MUST only push resources which would have been returned from a GET request.</p> 1808 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.6">Note: If the server does not have all of the Name/Value Response headers available at the time it issues the HEADERS frame 1809 for the pushed resource, it may later use an additional HEADERS frame to augment the name/value pairs to be associated with 1810 the pushed stream. The subsequent HEADERS frame(s) must not contain a header for ':host', ':scheme', or ':path' (e.g. the 1811 server can't change the identity of the resource to be pushed). The HEADERS frame must not contain duplicate headers with 1812 a previously sent HEADERS frame. The server must send a HEADERS frame including the scheme/host/port headers before sending 1813 any data frames on the stream. 1814 </p> 1815 </div> 1816 <div> 1817 <h3 id="rfc.section.3.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.3.2">3.3.2</a> Client implementation 1818 </h3> 1819 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.1">When fetching a resource the client has 3 possibilities: </p> 1820 <ul class="empty"> 1821 <li>the resource is not being pushed</li> 1822 <li>the resource is being pushed, but the data has not yet arrived</li> 1823 <li>the resource is being pushed, and the data has started to arrive</li> 1824 </ul> 1825 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.2">When a SYN_STREAM and HEADERS frame which contains an Associated-To-Stream-ID is received, the client must not issue GET requests 1826 for the resource in the pushed stream, and instead wait for the pushed stream to arrive. 1827 </p> 1828 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.3">If a client receives a server push stream with stream-id 0, it MUST issue a session error (<a href="#SessionErrorHandler" title="Session Error Handling">Section 2.4.1</a>) with the status code PROTOCOL_ERROR. 1829 </p> 1830 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.4">When a client receives a SYN_STREAM from the server without a the ':host', ':scheme', and ':path' headers in the Name/Value 1831 section, it MUST reply with a RST_STREAM with error code HTTP_PROTOCOL_ERROR. 1832 </p> 1833 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.5">To cancel individual server push streams, the client can issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with error code CANCEL. Upon receipt, the server MUST stop sending on this stream immediately (this is an Abrupt termination). 1834 </p> 1835 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.6">To cancel all server push streams related to a request, the client may issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with error code CANCEL on the associated-stream-id. By cancelling that stream, the server MUST immediately stop sending frames 1836 for any streams with in-association-to for the original stream. 1837 </p> 1838 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.7">If the server sends a HEADER frame containing duplicate headers with a previous HEADERS frame for the same stream, the client 1839 must issue a stream error (<a href="#StreamErrorHandler" title="Stream Error Handling">Section 2.4.2</a>) with error code PROTOCOL ERROR. 1840 </p> 1841 <p id="rfc.section.3.3.2.p.8">If the server sends a HEADERS frame after sending a data frame for the same stream, the client MAY ignore the HEADERS frame. 1842 Ignoring the HEADERS frame after a data frame prevents handling of HTTP's trailing headers (http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.40). 1843 </p> 1844 </div> 1845 </div> 1846 </div> 1847 <div> 1848 <h1 id="rfc.section.4"><a href="#rfc.section.4">4.</a> Design Rationale and Notes 1849 </h1> 1850 <p id="rfc.section.4.p.1">Authors' notes: The notes in this section have no bearing on the SPDY protocol as specified within this document, and none 1851 of these notes should be considered authoritative about how the protocol works. However, these notes may prove useful in future 1852 debates about how to resolve protocol ambiguities or how to evolve the protocol going forward. They may be removed before 1853 the final draft. 1854 </p> 1855 <div> 1856 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.1"><a href="#rfc.section.4.1">4.1</a> Separation of Framing Layer and Application Layer 1857 </h2> 1858 <p id="rfc.section.4.1.p.1">Readers may note that this specification sometimes blends the framing layer (<a href="#FramingLayer" title="SPDY Framing Layer">Section 2</a>) with requirements of a specific application - HTTP (<a href="#HTTPLayer" title="HTTP Layering over SPDY">Section 3</a>). This is reflected in the request/response nature of the streams, the definition of the HEADERS and compression contexts 1859 which are very similar to HTTP, and other areas as well. 1860 </p> 1861 <p id="rfc.section.4.1.p.2">This blending is intentional - the primary goal of this protocol is to create a low-latency protocol for use with HTTP. Isolating 1862 the two layers is convenient for description of the protocol and how it relates to existing HTTP implementations. However, 1863 the ability to reuse the SPDY framing layer is a non goal. 1864 </p> 1865 </div> 1866 <div> 1867 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.2"><a href="#rfc.section.4.2">4.2</a> Error handling - Framing Layer 1868 </h2> 1869 <p id="rfc.section.4.2.p.1">Error handling at the SPDY layer splits errors into two groups: Those that affect an individual SPDY stream, and those that 1870 do not. 1871 </p> 1872 <p id="rfc.section.4.2.p.2">When an error is confined to a single stream, but general framing is in tact, SPDY attempts to use the RST_STREAM as a mechanism 1873 to invalidate the stream but move forward without aborting the connection altogether. 1874 </p> 1875 <p id="rfc.section.4.2.p.3">For errors occuring outside of a single stream context, SPDY assumes the entire session is hosed. In this case, the endpoint 1876 detecting the error should initiate a connection close. 1877 </p> 1878 </div> 1879 <div> 1880 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.3"><a href="#rfc.section.4.3">4.3</a> One Connection Per Domain 1881 </h2> 1882 <p id="rfc.section.4.3.p.1">SPDY attempts to use fewer connections than other protocols have traditionally used. The rationale for this behavior is because 1883 it is very difficult to provide a consistent level of service (e.g. TCP slow-start), prioritization, or optimal compression 1884 when the client is connecting to the server through multiple channels. 1885 </p> 1886 <p id="rfc.section.4.3.p.2">Through lab measurements, we have seen consistent latency benefits by using fewer connections from the client. The overall 1887 number of packets sent by SPDY can be as much as 40% less than HTTP. Handling large numbers of concurrent connections on the 1888 server also does become a scalability problem, and SPDY reduces this load. 1889 </p> 1890 <p id="rfc.section.4.3.p.3">The use of multiple connections is not without benefit, however. Because SPDY multiplexes multiple, independent streams onto 1891 a single stream, it creates a potential for head-of-line blocking problems at the transport level. In tests so far, the negative 1892 effects of head-of-line blocking (especially in the presence of packet loss) is outweighed by the benefits of compression 1893 and prioritization. 1894 </p> 1895 </div> 1896 <div> 1897 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.4"><a href="#rfc.section.4.4">4.4</a> Fixed vs Variable Length Fields 1898 </h2> 1899 <p id="rfc.section.4.4.p.1">SPDY favors use of fixed length 32bit fields in cases where smaller, variable length encodings could have been used. To some, 1900 this seems like a tragic waste of bandwidth. SPDY choses the simple encoding for speed and simplicity. 1901 </p> 1902 <p id="rfc.section.4.4.p.2">The goal of SPDY is to reduce latency on the network. The overhead of SPDY frames is generally quite low. Each data frame 1903 is only an 8 byte overhead for a 1452 byte payload (~0.6%). At the time of this writing, bandwidth is already plentiful, and 1904 there is a strong trend indicating that bandwidth will continue to increase. With an average worldwide bandwidth of 1Mbps, 1905 and assuming that a variable length encoding could reduce the overhead by 50%, the latency saved by using a variable length 1906 encoding would be less than 100 nanoseconds. More interesting are the effects when the larger encodings force a packet boundary, 1907 in which case a round-trip could be induced. However, by addressing other aspects of SPDY and TCP interactions, we believe 1908 this is completely mitigated. 1909 </p> 1910 </div> 1911 <div> 1912 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.5"><a href="#rfc.section.4.5">4.5</a> Compression Context(s) 1913 </h2> 1914 <p id="rfc.section.4.5.p.1">When isolating the compression contexts used for communicating with multiple origins, we had a few choices to make. We could 1915 have maintained a map (or list) of compression contexts usable for each origin. The basic case is easy - each HEADERS frame 1916 would need to identify the context to use for that frame. However, compression contexts are not cheap, so the lifecycle of 1917 each context would need to be bounded. For proxy servers, where we could churn through many contexts, this would be a concern. 1918 We considered using a static set of contexts, say 16 of them, which would bound the memory use. We also considered dynamic 1919 contexts, which could be created on the fly, and would need to be subsequently destroyed. All of these are complicated, and 1920 ultimately we decided that such a mechanism creates too many problems to solve. 1921 </p> 1922 <p id="rfc.section.4.5.p.2">Alternatively, we've chosen the simple approach, which is to simply provide a flag for resetting the compression context. 1923 For the common case (no proxy), this fine because most requests are to the same origin and we never need to reset the context. 1924 For cases where we are using two different origins over a single SPDY session, we simply reset the compression state between 1925 each transition. 1926 </p> 1927 </div> 1928 <div> 1929 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.6"><a href="#rfc.section.4.6">4.6</a> Unidirectional streams 1930 </h2> 1931 <p id="rfc.section.4.6.p.1">Many readers notice that unidirectional streams are both a bit confusing in concept and also somewhat redundant. If the recipient 1932 of a stream doesn't wish to send data on a stream, it could simply send a SYN_REPLY with the FLAG_FIN bit set. The FLAG_UNIDIRECTIONAL 1933 is, therefore, not necessary. 1934 </p> 1935 <p id="rfc.section.4.6.p.2">It is true that we don't need the UNIDIRECTIONAL markings. It is added because it avoids the recipient of pushed streams from 1936 needing to send a set of empty frames (e.g. the SYN_STREAM w/ FLAG_FIN) which otherwise serve no purpose. 1937 </p> 1938 </div> 1939 <div> 1940 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.7"><a href="#rfc.section.4.7">4.7</a> Data Compression 1941 </h2> 1942 <p id="rfc.section.4.7.p.1">Generic compression of data portion of the streams (as opposed to compression of the headers) without knowing the content 1943 of the stream is redundant. There is no value in compressing a stream which is already compressed. Because of this, SPDY does 1944 allow data compression to be optional. We included it because study of existing websites shows that many sites are not using 1945 compression as they should, and users suffer because of it. We wanted a mechanism where, at the SPDY layer, site administrators 1946 could simply force compression - it is better to compress twice than to not compress. 1947 </p> 1948 <p id="rfc.section.4.7.p.2">Overall, however, with this feature being optional and sometimes redundant, it is unclear if it is useful at all. We will 1949 likely remove it from the specification. 1950 </p> 1951 </div> 1952 <div> 1953 <h2 id="rfc.section.4.8"><a href="#rfc.section.4.8">4.8</a> Server Push 1954 </h2> 1955 <p id="rfc.section.4.8.p.1">A subtle but important point is that server push streams must be declared before the associated stream is closed. The reason 1956 for this is so that proxies have a lifetime for which they can discard information about previous streams. If a pushed stream 1957 could associate itself with an already-closed stream, then endpoints would not have a specific lifecycle for when they could 1958 disavow knowledge of the streams which went before. 1959 </p> 1960 </div> 1961 </div> 1962 <div> 1963 <h1 id="rfc.section.5"><a href="#rfc.section.5">5.</a> Security Considerations 1964 </h1> 1965 <div> 1966 <h2 id="rfc.section.5.1"><a href="#rfc.section.5.1">5.1</a> Use of Same-origin constraints 1967 </h2> 1968 <p id="rfc.section.5.1.p.1">This specification uses the <a href="#RFC6454">same-origin policy</a> <cite title="The Web Origin Concept" id="rfc.xref.RFC6454.4">[RFC6454]</cite> in all cases where verification of content is required. 1969 </p> 1970 </div> 1971 <div> 1972 <h2 id="rfc.section.5.2"><a href="#rfc.section.5.2">5.2</a> HTTP Headers and SPDY Headers 1973 </h2> 1974 <p id="rfc.section.5.2.p.1">At the application level, HTTP uses name/value pairs in its headers. Because SPDY merges the existing HTTP headers with SPDY 1975 headers, there is a possibility that some HTTP applications already use a particular header name. To avoid any conflicts, 1976 all headers introduced for layering HTTP over SPDY are prefixed with ":". ":" is not a valid sequence in HTTP header naming, 1977 preventing any possible conflict. 1978 </p> 1979 </div> 1980 <div> 1981 <h2 id="rfc.section.5.3"><a href="#rfc.section.5.3">5.3</a> Cross-Protocol Attacks 1982 </h2> 1983 <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.1">By utilizing TLS, we believe that SPDY introduces no new cross-protocol attacks. TLS encrypts the contents of all transmission 1984 (except the handshake itself), making it difficult for attackers to control the data which could be used in a cross-protocol 1985 attack. 1986 </p> 1987 </div> 1988 <div> 1989 <h2 id="rfc.section.5.4"><a href="#rfc.section.5.4">5.4</a> Server Push Implicit Headers 1990 </h2> 1991 <p id="rfc.section.5.4.p.1">Pushed resources do not have an associated request. In order for existing HTTP cache control validations (such as the Vary 1992 header) to work, however, all cached resources must have a set of request headers. For this reason, browsers MUST be careful 1993 to inherit request headers from the associated stream for the push. This includes the 'Cookie' header. 1994 </p> 1995 </div> 1996 </div> 1997 <div> 1998 <h1 id="rfc.section.6"><a href="#rfc.section.6">6.</a> Privacy Considerations 1999 </h1> 2000 <div> 2001 <h2 id="rfc.section.6.1"><a href="#rfc.section.6.1">6.1</a> Long Lived Connections 2002 </h2> 2003 <p id="rfc.section.6.1.p.1">SPDY aims to keep connections open longer between clients and servers in order to reduce the latency when a user makes a request. 2004 The maintenance of these connections over time could be used to expose private information. For example, a user using a browser 2005 hours after the previous user stopped using that browser may be able to learn about what the previous user was doing. This 2006 is a problem with HTTP in its current form as well, however the short lived connections make it less of a risk. 2007 </p> 2008 </div> 2009 <div> 2010 <h2 id="rfc.section.6.2"><a href="#rfc.section.6.2">6.2</a> SETTINGS frame 2011 </h2> 2012 <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.1">The SPDY SETTINGS frame allows servers to store out-of-band transmitted information about the communication between client 2013 and server on the client. Although this is intended only to be used to reduce latency, renegade servers could use it as a 2014 mechanism to store identifying information about the client in future requests. 2015 </p> 2016 <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.2">Clients implementing privacy modes, such as Google Chrome's "incognito mode", may wish to disable client-persisted SETTINGS 2017 storage. 2018 </p> 2019 <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.3">Clients MUST clear persisted SETTINGS information when clearing the cookies.</p> 2020 <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.4">TODO: Put range maximums on each type of setting to limit inappropriate uses.</p> 2021 </div> 2022 </div> 2023 <div> 2024 <h1 id="rfc.section.7"><a href="#rfc.section.7">7.</a> Incompatibilities with SPDY draft #2 2025 </h1> 2026 <p id="rfc.section.7.p.1">Here is a list of the major changes between this draft and draft #2. </p> 2027 <ul class="empty"> 2028 <li>Addition of flow control</li> 2029 <li>Increased 16 bit length fields in SYN_STREAM and SYN_REPLY to 32 bits.</li> 2030 <li>Changed definition of compression for DATA frames</li> 2031 <li>Updated compression dictionary</li> 2032 <li>Fixed off-by-one on the compression dictionary for headers</li> 2033 <li>Increased priority field from 2bits to 3bits.</li> 2034 <li>Removed NOOP frame</li> 2035 <li>Split the request "url" into "scheme", "host", and "path"</li> 2036 <li>Added the requirement that POSTs contain content-length.</li> 2037 <li>Removed wasted 16bits of unused space from the end of the SYN_REPLY and HEADERS frames.</li> 2038 <li>Fixed bug: Priorities were described backward (0 was lowest instead of highest).</li> 2039 <li>Fixed bug: Name/Value header counts were duplicated in both the Name Value header block and also the containing frame.</li> 2040 </ul> 2041 </div> 2042 <div> 2043 <h1 id="rfc.section.8"><a href="#rfc.section.8">8.</a> Requirements Notation 2044 </h1> 2045 <p id="rfc.section.8.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" 2046 in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119">RFC 2119</a> <cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1">[RFC2119]</cite>. 2047 </p> 2048 </div> 2049 <div> 2050 <h1 id="rfc.section.9"><a href="#rfc.section.9">9.</a> Acknowledgements 2051 </h1> 2052 <p id="rfc.section.9.p.1">Many individuals have contributed to the design and evolution of SPDY: Adam Langley, Wan-Teh Chang, Jim Morrison, Mark Nottingham, 2053 Alyssa Wilk, Costin Manolache, William Chan, Vitaliy Lvin, Joe Chan, Adam Barth, Ryan Hamilton, Gavin Peters, Kent Alstad, 2054 Kevin Lindsay, Paul Amer, Fan Yang, Jonathan Leighton. 2055 </p> 2056 </div> 1946 2057 <h1 id="rfc.references"><a href="#rfc.section.10" id="rfc.section.10">10.</a> Normative References 1947 2058 </h1> 1948 <table> 2059 <table> 1949 2060 <tr> 1950 2061 <td class="reference"><b id="ASCII">[ASCII]</b></td> … … 1953 2064 <tr> 1954 2065 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC0793">[RFC0793]</b></td> 1955 <td class="top">Postel, J., “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc793">Transmission Control Protocol</a>”, STD 7, RFC 793, September 1981.2066 <td class="top">Postel, J., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc793">Transmission Control Protocol</a>”, STD 7, RFC 793, September 1981. 1956 2067 </td> 1957 2068 </tr> 1958 2069 <tr> 1959 2070 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC1738">[RFC1738]</b></td> 1960 <td class="top">Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., and M. McCahill, “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1738">Uniform Resource Locators (URL)</a>”, RFC 1738, December 1994.2071 <td class="top">Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., and M. McCahill, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1738">Uniform Resource Locators (URL)</a>”, RFC 1738, December 1994. 1961 2072 </td> 1962 2073 </tr> 1963 2074 <tr> 1964 2075 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC1950">[RFC1950]</b></td> 1965 <td class="top"><a href="mailto:ghost@aladdin.com" title="Aladdin Enterprises">Deutsch, L.</a> and J. Gailly, “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1950">ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3</a>”, RFC 1950, May 1996.2076 <td class="top"><a href="mailto:ghost@aladdin.com" title="Aladdin Enterprises">Deutsch, L.</a> and J. Gailly, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1950">ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3</a>”, RFC 1950, May 1996. 1966 2077 </td> 1967 2078 </tr> 1968 2079 <tr> 1969 2080 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2119">[RFC2119]</b></td> 1970 <td class="top"><a href="mailto:sob@harvard.edu" title="Harvard University">Bradner, S.</a>, “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>”, BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.2081 <td class="top"><a href="mailto:sob@harvard.edu" title="Harvard University">Bradner, S.</a>, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>”, BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. 1971 2082 </td> 1972 2083 </tr> 1973 2084 <tr> 1974 2085 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2285">[RFC2285]</b></td> 1975 <td class="top">Mandeville, R., “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2285">Benchmarking Terminology for LAN Switching Devices</a>”, RFC 2285, February 1998.2086 <td class="top">Mandeville, R., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2285">Benchmarking Terminology for LAN Switching Devices</a>”, RFC 2285, February 1998. 1976 2087 </td> 1977 2088 </tr> 1978 2089 <tr> 1979 2090 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2616">[RFC2616]</b></td> 1980 <td class="top"><a href="mailto:fielding@ics.uci.edu" title="University of California, Irvine">Fielding, R.</a>, <a href="mailto:jg@w3.org" title="W3C">Gettys, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:mogul@wrl.dec.com" title="Compaq Computer Corporation">Mogul, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:frystyk@w3.org" title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a href="mailto:masinter@parc.xerox.com" title="Xerox Corporation">Masinter, L.</a>, <a href="mailto:paulle@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, and <a href="mailto:timbl@w3.org" title="W3C">T. Berners-Lee</a>, “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a>”, RFC 2616, June 1999.2091 <td class="top"><a href="mailto:fielding@ics.uci.edu" title="University of California, Irvine">Fielding, R.</a>, <a href="mailto:jg@w3.org" title="W3C">Gettys, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:mogul@wrl.dec.com" title="Compaq Computer Corporation">Mogul, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:frystyk@w3.org" title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a href="mailto:masinter@parc.xerox.com" title="Xerox Corporation">Masinter, L.</a>, <a href="mailto:paulle@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, and <a href="mailto:timbl@w3.org" title="W3C">T. Berners-Lee</a>, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a>”, RFC 2616, June 1999. 1981 2092 </td> 1982 2093 </tr> 1983 2094 <tr> 1984 2095 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2617">[RFC2617]</b></td> 1985 <td class="top"><a href="mailto:john@math.nwu.edu" title="Northwestern University, Department of Mathematics">Franks, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:pbaker@verisign.com" title="Verisign Inc.">Hallam-Baker, P.</a>, <a href="mailto:jeff@AbiSource.com" title="AbiSource, Inc.">Hostetler, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:lawrence@agranat.com" title="Agranat Systems, Inc.">Lawrence, S.</a>, <a href="mailto:paulle@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, Luotonen, A., and <a href="mailto:stewart@OpenMarket.com" title="Open Market, Inc.">L. Stewart</a>, “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2617">HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication</a>”, RFC 2617, June 1999.2096 <td class="top"><a href="mailto:john@math.nwu.edu" title="Northwestern University, Department of Mathematics">Franks, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:pbaker@verisign.com" title="Verisign Inc.">Hallam-Baker, P.</a>, <a href="mailto:jeff@AbiSource.com" title="AbiSource, Inc.">Hostetler, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:lawrence@agranat.com" title="Agranat Systems, Inc.">Lawrence, S.</a>, <a href="mailto:paulle@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, Luotonen, A., and <a href="mailto:stewart@OpenMarket.com" title="Open Market, Inc.">L. Stewart</a>, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2617">HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication</a>”, RFC 2617, June 1999. 1986 2097 </td> 1987 2098 </tr> 1988 2099 <tr> 1989 2100 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC4366">[RFC4366]</b></td> 1990 <td class="top">Blake-Wilson, S., Nystrom, M., Hopwood, D., Mikkelsen, J., and T. Wright, “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4366">Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions</a>”, RFC 4366, April 2006.2101 <td class="top">Blake-Wilson, S., Nystrom, M., Hopwood, D., Mikkelsen, J., and T. Wright, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4366">Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions</a>”, RFC 4366, April 2006. 1991 2102 </td> 1992 2103 </tr> 1993 2104 <tr> 1994 2105 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC4559">[RFC4559]</b></td> 1995 <td class="top">Jaganathan, K., Zhu, L., and J. Brezak, “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4559">SPNEGO-based Kerberos and NTLM HTTP Authentication in Microsoft Windows</a>”, RFC 4559, June 2006.2106 <td class="top">Jaganathan, K., Zhu, L., and J. Brezak, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4559">SPNEGO-based Kerberos and NTLM HTTP Authentication in Microsoft Windows</a>”, RFC 4559, June 2006. 1996 2107 </td> 1997 2108 </tr> 1998 2109 <tr> 1999 2110 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC5246">[RFC5246]</b></td> 2000 <td class="top">Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246">The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2</a>”, RFC 5246, August 2008.2111 <td class="top">Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246">The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2</a>”, RFC 5246, August 2008. 2001 2112 </td> 2002 2113 </tr> 2003 2114 <tr> 2004 2115 <td class="reference"><b id="RFC6454">[RFC6454]</b></td> 2005 <td class="top">Barth, A., “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6454">The Web Origin Concept</a>”, RFC 6454, December 2011.2116 <td class="top">Barth, A., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6454">The Web Origin Concept</a>”, RFC 6454, December 2011. 2006 2117 </td> 2007 2118 </tr> 2008 2119 <tr> 2009 2120 <td class="reference"><b id="TLSNPN">[TLSNPN]</b></td> 2010 <td class="top">Langley, A., “<a href="http ://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-01">TLS Next Protocol Negotiation</a>”, Internet-Draft draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-01 (work in progress), August 2010.2121 <td class="top">Langley, A., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-01">TLS Next Protocol Negotiation</a>”, Internet-Draft draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-01 (work in progress), August 2010. 2011 2122 </td> 2012 2123 </tr> … … 2017 2128 </tr> 2018 2129 </table> 2019 <div class="avoidbreak"> 2020 <h1 id="rfc.authors"><a href="#rfc.authors">Authors' Addresses</a></h1> 2021 <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Mike Belshe</span><span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Belshe</span><span class="given-name">Mike</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">Twist</span><span class="vcardline">Email: <a href="mailto:mbelshe@chromium.org"><span class="email">mbelshe@chromium.org</span></a></span></address> 2022 <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Roberto Peon</span><span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Peon</span><span class="given-name">Roberto</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">Google, Inc</span><span class="vcardline">Email: <a href="mailto:fenix@google.com"><span class="email">fenix@google.com</span></a></span></address> 2023 <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Martin Thomson</span> 2024 (editor) 2025 <span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Thomson</span><span class="given-name">Martin</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">Microsoft</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">3210 Porter Drive</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Palo Alto</span>, <span class="postal-code">94043</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">US</span></span><span class="vcardline">Email: <a href="mailto:martin.thomson@skype.net"><span class="email">martin.thomson@skype.net</span></a></span></address> 2026 <address class="vcard"><span class="vcardline"><span class="fn">Alexey Melnikov</span> 2027 (editor) 2028 <span class="n hidden"><span class="family-name">Melnikov</span><span class="given-name">Alexey</span></span></span><span class="org vcardline">Isode Ltd</span><span class="adr"><span class="street-address vcardline">5 Castle Business Village</span><span class="street-address vcardline">36 Station Road</span><span class="vcardline"><span class="locality">Hampton</span>, <span class="region">Middlesex</span> <span class="postal-code">TW12 2BX</span></span><span class="country-name vcardline">UK</span></span><span class="vcardline">Email: <a href="mailto:Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com"><span class="email">Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com</span></a></span></address> 2130 <div id="change.log"> 2131 <h1 id="rfc.section.A" class="np"><a href="#rfc.section.A">A.</a> <a href="#change.log">Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)</a></h1> 2132 <div id="changes.since.draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00"> 2133 <h2 id="rfc.section.A.1"><a href="#rfc.section.A.1">A.1</a> <a href="#changes.since.draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00">Since draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00</a></h2> 2134 <p id="rfc.section.A.1.p.1">Adopted as base for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2.</p> 2135 <p id="rfc.section.A.1.p.2">Updated authors/editors list.</p> 2136 <p id="rfc.section.A.1.p.3">Added status note.</p> 2137 </div> 2029 2138 </div> 2030 <h1 id="rfc.section.A" class="np"><a href="#rfc.section.A">A.</a> <a id="change.log" href="#change.log">Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)</a></h1>2031 <h2 id="rfc.section.A.1"><a href="#rfc.section.A.1">A.1</a> <a id="changes.since.draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00" href="#changes.since.draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00">Since draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00</a></h2>2032 <p id="rfc.section.A.1.p.1">Adopted as base for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2.</p>2033 <p id="rfc.section.A.1.p.2">Updated authors/editors list.</p>2034 <p id="rfc.section.A.1.p.3">Added status note.</p>2035 2139 <h1 id="rfc.index"><a href="#rfc.index">Index</a></h1> 2036 2140 <p class="noprint"><a href="#rfc.index.A">A</a> <a href="#rfc.index.R">R</a> <a href="#rfc.index.T">T</a> <a href="#rfc.index.U">U</a> … … 2069 2173 </ul> 2070 2174 </div> 2175 <div class="avoidbreak"> 2176 <h1 id="rfc.authors"><a href="#rfc.authors">Authors' Addresses</a></h1> 2177 <p><b>Mike Belshe</b><br>Twist<br>Email: <a href="mailto:mbelshe@chromium.org">mbelshe@chromium.org</a></p> 2178 <p><b>Roberto Peon</b><br>Google, Inc<br>Email: <a href="mailto:fenix@google.com">fenix@google.com</a></p> 2179 <p><b>Martin Thomson</b> 2180 (editor) 2181 <br>Microsoft<br>3210 Porter Drive<br>Palo Alto, 94043<br>US<br>Email: <a href="mailto:martin.thomson@skype.net">martin.thomson@skype.net</a></p> 2182 <p><b>Alexey Melnikov</b> 2183 (editor) 2184 <br>Isode Ltd<br>5 Castle Business Village<br>36 Station Road<br>Hampton, Middlesex TW12 2BX<br>UK<br>Email: <a href="mailto:Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com">Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com</a></p> 2185 </div> 2071 2186 </body> 2072 2187 </html>
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.