Changeset 2529

Timestamp:

03/01/14 15:12:58 (7 years ago)

Author:

julian.reschke@…

Message:

do not move 2068/2616/2145 to historic (see #544)

Location:

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest

Files:

• p1-messaging.html (modified) (11 diffs)
• p1-messaging.xml (modified) (2 diffs)

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.html

@@ -448 +448 @@
   }
   @bottom-center {
-       content: "Expires July 6, 2014";
+       content: "Expires July 7, 2014";
   }
   @bottom-right {
@@ -490 +490 @@
       <meta name="dct.creator" content="Reschke, J. F.">
       <meta name="dct.identifier" content="urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest">
-      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2014-01-02">
+      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2014-01-03">
       <meta name="dct.replaces" content="urn:ietf:rfc:2145">
       <meta name="dct.replaces" content="urn:ietf:rfc:2616">
@@ -519 +519 @@
             <tr>
                <td class="left">Intended status: Standards Track</td>
-               <td class="right">January 2, 2014</td>
+               <td class="right">January 3, 2014</td>
             </tr>
             <tr>
-               <td class="left">Expires: July 6, 2014</td>
+               <td class="left">Expires: July 7, 2014</td>
                <td class="right"></td>
             </tr>
@@ -551 +551 @@
             in progress”.
          </p>
-         <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on July 6, 2014.</p>
+         <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on July 7, 2014.</p>
       </div>
       <div id="rfc.copyrightnotice">
@@ -737 +737 @@
             </li>
          </ul>
-         <p id="rfc.section.1.p.2">This HTTP/1.1 specification obsoletes and moves to historic status <cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">RFC 2616</cite>, its predecessor <cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.1">RFC 2068</cite>, and <cite title="Use and Interpretation of HTTP Version Numbers" id="rfc.xref.RFC2145.1">RFC 2145</cite> (on HTTP versioning). This specification also updates the use of CONNECT to establish a tunnel, previously defined in <cite title="Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2817.1">RFC 2817</cite>, and defines the "https" URI scheme that was described informally in <cite title="HTTP Over TLS" id="rfc.xref.RFC2818.1">RFC 2818</cite>.
+         <p id="rfc.section.1.p.2">This HTTP/1.1 specification obsoletes <cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">RFC 2616</cite> and <cite title="Use and Interpretation of HTTP Version Numbers" id="rfc.xref.RFC2145.1">RFC 2145</cite> (on HTTP versioning). This specification also updates the use of CONNECT to establish a tunnel, previously defined in <cite title="Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1" id="rfc.xref.RFC2817.1">RFC 2817</cite>, and defines the "https" URI scheme that was described informally in <cite title="HTTP Over TLS" id="rfc.xref.RFC2818.1">RFC 2818</cite>.
          </p>
          <p id="rfc.section.1.p.3">HTTP is a generic interface protocol for information systems. It is designed to hide the details of how a service is implemented
@@ -1056 +1056 @@
                is introduced, and that the minor number will only be incremented when changes made to the protocol have the effect of adding
                to the message semantics or implying additional capabilities of the sender. However, the minor version was not incremented
-               for the changes introduced between <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.2"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a> and <a href="#RFC2616" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.2"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2616]</cite></a>, and this revision has specifically avoided any such changes to the protocol.
+               for the changes introduced between <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a> and <a href="#RFC2616" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.2"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2616]</cite></a>, and this revision has specifically avoided any such changes to the protocol.
             </p>
             <p id="rfc.section.2.6.p.14">When an HTTP message is received with a major version number that the recipient implements, but a higher minor version number
@@ -2180 +2180 @@
                on a persistent connection would be misinterpreted as the next request. Likewise, a client <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> read the entire response message body if it intends to reuse the same connection for a subsequent request.
             </p>
-            <p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.6">A proxy server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> maintain a persistent connection with an HTTP/1.0 client (see <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-19.7.1">Section 19.7.1</a> of <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.3"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a> for information and discussion of the problems with the Keep-Alive header field implemented by many HTTP/1.0 clients).
+            <p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.6">A proxy server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> maintain a persistent connection with an HTTP/1.0 client (see <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-19.7.1">Section 19.7.1</a> of <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.2"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a> for information and discussion of the problems with the Keep-Alive header field implemented by many HTTP/1.0 clients).
             </p>
             <p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.7">Clients and servers <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> assume that a persistent connection is maintained for HTTP versions less than 1.1 unless it is explicitly signaled. See <a href="#compatibility.with.http.1.0.persistent.connections" title="Keep-Alive Connections">Appendix&nbsp;A.1.2</a> for more information on backward compatibility with HTTP/1.0 clients.
@@ -2920 +2920 @@
       <div id="acks">
          <h1 id="rfc.section.10"><a href="#rfc.section.10">10.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#acks">Acknowledgments</a></h1>
-         <p id="rfc.section.10.p.1">This edition of HTTP/1.1 builds on the many contributions that went into <a href="#RFC1945" id="rfc.xref.RFC1945.2">RFC 1945</a>, <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.4">RFC 2068</a>, <a href="#RFC2145" id="rfc.xref.RFC2145.2">RFC 2145</a>, and <a href="#RFC2616" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.3">RFC 2616</a>, including substantial contributions made by the previous authors, editors, and working group chairs: Tim Berners-Lee, Ari
+         <p id="rfc.section.10.p.1">This edition of HTTP/1.1 builds on the many contributions that went into <a href="#RFC1945" id="rfc.xref.RFC1945.2">RFC 1945</a>, <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.3">RFC 2068</a>, <a href="#RFC2145" id="rfc.xref.RFC2145.2">RFC 2145</a>, and <a href="#RFC2616" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.3">RFC 2616</a>, including substantial contributions made by the previous authors, editors, and working group chairs: Tim Berners-Lee, Ari
             Luotonen, Roy T. Fielding, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, Jim Gettys, Jeffrey C. Mogul, Larry Masinter, and Paul J. Leach. Mark Nottingham
             oversaw this effort as working group chair.
@@ -3204 +3204 @@
                <p id="rfc.section.A.1.2.p.1">In HTTP/1.0, each connection is established by the client prior to the request and closed by the server after sending the
                   response. However, some implementations implement the explicitly negotiated ("Keep-Alive") version of persistent connections
-                  described in <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-19.7.1">Section 19.7.1</a> of <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.5"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a>.
+                  described in <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-19.7.1">Section 19.7.1</a> of <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.4"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a>.
                </p>
                <p id="rfc.section.A.1.2.p.2">Some clients and servers might wish to be compatible with these previous approaches to persistent connections, by explicitly
@@ -3447 +3447 @@
                </li>
                <li>&lt;<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/542">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/542</a>&gt;: "improve introduction of list rule"
+               </li>
+               <li>&lt;<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/544">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/544</a>&gt;: "moving 2616/2068/2145 to historic"
                </li>
             </ul>
@@ -3689 +3691 @@
                   </li>
                   <li><em>RFC2047</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2047.1">3.2.4</a>, <a href="#RFC2047"><b>11.2</b></a></li>
-                  <li><em>RFC2068</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.1">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.2">2.6</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.3">6.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.4">10</a>, <a href="#RFC2068"><b>11.2</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.5">A.1.2</a><ul>
-                        <li><em>Section 19.7.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.3">6.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.5">A.1.2</a></li>
+                  <li><em>RFC2068</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.1">2.6</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.2">6.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.3">10</a>, <a href="#RFC2068"><b>11.2</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.4">A.1.2</a><ul>
+                        <li><em>Section 19.7.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.2">6.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.4">A.1.2</a></li>
                      </ul>
                   </li>

draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.xml

@@ -158 +158 @@
 </t>
 <t>
-   This HTTP/1.1 specification obsoletes and moves to historic status
-   <xref target="RFC2616" x:fmt="none">RFC 2616</xref>, its predecessor
-   <xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="none">RFC 2068</xref>, and
+   This HTTP/1.1 specification obsoletes 
+   <xref target="RFC2616" x:fmt="none">RFC 2616</xref> and
    <xref target="RFC2145" x:fmt="none">RFC 2145</xref> (on HTTP versioning).
    This specification also updates the use of CONNECT to establish a tunnel,
@@ -5443 +5442 @@
       "improve introduction of list rule"
     </t>
+    <t>
+      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/544"/>:
+      "moving 2616/2068/2145 to historic"
+    </t>
   </list>
 </t>