Ignore:
Timestamp:
20/12/13 07:58:52 (7 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

add note about method-specific security considerations (see #529)

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.xml

    r2513 r2514  
    8787    There are no security considerations related to the registration itself.
    8888  </t>
     89  <t>
     90    Security relations applicable to the individual HTTP methods ought to be
     91    discussed in the specifications that define them.
     92  </t>
    8993</section> 
    9094
     
    449453<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14" anchor="changes.since.14">
    450454<t>
     455  Closed issues:
     456  <list style="symbols">
     457    <t>
     458      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/529"/>:
     459      "IESG ballot on draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14"
     460    </t>
     461  </list>
     462</t>
     463<t>
    451464  Removed misleading statement about "standards-track" RFCs, as some of the
    452465  methods registered here indeed originate from Experimental RFCs, and furthermore
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.