Ignore:
Timestamp:
20/12/13 07:58:52 (7 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

add note about method-specific security considerations (see #529)

Location:
draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest
Files:
2 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.html

    r2513 r2514  
    421421  }
    422422  @bottom-center {
    423        content: "Expires June 22, 2014";
     423       content: "Expires June 23, 2014";
    424424  }
    425425  @bottom-right {
     
    451451      <meta name="dct.creator" content="Reschke, J. F.">
    452452      <meta name="dct.identifier" content="urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-latest">
    453       <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2013-12-19">
     453      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2013-12-20">
    454454      <meta name="dct.abstract" content="This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) methods which have been defined in RFCs before the IANA HTTP Method Registry was established.">
    455455      <meta name="description" content="This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) methods which have been defined in RFCs before the IANA HTTP Method Registry was established.">
     
    468468            <tr>
    469469               <td class="left">Intended status: Informational</td>
    470                <td class="right">December 19, 2013</td>
     470               <td class="right">December 20, 2013</td>
    471471            </tr>
    472472            <tr>
    473                <td class="left">Expires: June 22, 2014</td>
     473               <td class="left">Expires: June 23, 2014</td>
    474474               <td class="right"></td>
    475475            </tr>
     
    498498            in progress”.
    499499         </p>
    500          <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on June 22, 2014.</p>
     500         <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on June 23, 2014.</p>
    501501      </div>
    502502      <div id="rfc.copyrightnotice">
     
    531531         <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#security.considerations">Security Considerations</a></h1>
    532532         <p id="rfc.section.2.p.1">There are no security considerations related to the registration itself.</p>
     533         <p id="rfc.section.2.p.2">Security relations applicable to the individual HTTP methods ought to be discussed in the specifications that define them.</p>
    533534      </div>
    534535      <div id="iana.considerations">
     
    810811         <div id="changes.since.14">
    811812            <h2 id="rfc.section.A.2"><a href="#rfc.section.A.2">A.2</a>&nbsp;<a href="#changes.since.14">Since draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14</a></h2>
    812             <p id="rfc.section.A.2.p.1">Removed misleading statement about "standards-track" RFCs, as some of the methods registered here indeed originate from Experimental
     813            <p id="rfc.section.A.2.p.1">Closed issues: </p>
     814            <ul>
     815               <li>&lt;<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/529">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/529</a>&gt;: "IESG ballot on draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14"
     816               </li>
     817            </ul>
     818            <p id="rfc.section.A.2.p.2">Removed misleading statement about "standards-track" RFCs, as some of the methods registered here indeed originate from Experimental
    813819               RFCs, and furthermore the new registry established in <a href="../../draft-ietf-httpbis/25/p2-semantics.html#method.registry" title="Method Registry">Section 8.1</a> of <a href="#draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics]</cite></a> uses "IETF Review".
    814820            </p>
  • draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.xml

    r2513 r2514  
    8787    There are no security considerations related to the registration itself.
    8888  </t>
     89  <t>
     90    Security relations applicable to the individual HTTP methods ought to be
     91    discussed in the specifications that define them.
     92  </t>
    8993</section> 
    9094
     
    449453<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14" anchor="changes.since.14">
    450454<t>
     455  Closed issues:
     456  <list style="symbols">
     457    <t>
     458      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/529"/>:
     459      "IESG ballot on draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14"
     460    </t>
     461  </list>
     462</t>
     463<t>
    451464  Removed misleading statement about "standards-track" RFCs, as some of the
    452465  methods registered here indeed originate from Experimental RFCs, and furthermore
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.