Changeset 2514

Timestamp:

20/12/13 07:58:52 (6 years ago)

Author:

julian.reschke@…

Message:

add note about method-specific security considerations (see #529)

Location:

draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest

Files:

• draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.html (modified) (6 diffs)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.xml (modified) (2 diffs)

draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.html

@@ -421 +421 @@
   }
   @bottom-center {
-       content: "Expires June 22, 2014";
+       content: "Expires June 23, 2014";
   }
   @bottom-right {
@@ -451 +451 @@
       <meta name="dct.creator" content="Reschke, J. F.">
       <meta name="dct.identifier" content="urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-latest">
-      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2013-12-19">
+      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2013-12-20">
       <meta name="dct.abstract" content="This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) methods which have been defined in RFCs before the IANA HTTP Method Registry was established.">
       <meta name="description" content="This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) methods which have been defined in RFCs before the IANA HTTP Method Registry was established.">
@@ -468 +468 @@
             <tr>
                <td class="left">Intended status: Informational</td>
-               <td class="right">December 19, 2013</td>
+               <td class="right">December 20, 2013</td>
             </tr>
             <tr>
-               <td class="left">Expires: June 22, 2014</td>
+               <td class="left">Expires: June 23, 2014</td>
                <td class="right"></td>
             </tr>
@@ -498 +498 @@
             in progress”.
          </p>
-         <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on June 22, 2014.</p>
+         <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on June 23, 2014.</p>
       </div>
       <div id="rfc.copyrightnotice">
@@ -531 +531 @@
          <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#security.considerations">Security Considerations</a></h1>
          <p id="rfc.section.2.p.1">There are no security considerations related to the registration itself.</p>
+         <p id="rfc.section.2.p.2">Security relations applicable to the individual HTTP methods ought to be discussed in the specifications that define them.</p>
       </div>
       <div id="iana.considerations">
@@ -810 +811 @@
          <div id="changes.since.14">
             <h2 id="rfc.section.A.2"><a href="#rfc.section.A.2">A.2</a>&nbsp;<a href="#changes.since.14">Since draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14</a></h2>
-            <p id="rfc.section.A.2.p.1">Removed misleading statement about "standards-track" RFCs, as some of the methods registered here indeed originate from Experimental
+            <p id="rfc.section.A.2.p.1">Closed issues: </p>
+            <ul>
+               <li>&lt;<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/529">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/529</a>&gt;: "IESG ballot on draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14"
+               </li>
+            </ul>
+            <p id="rfc.section.A.2.p.2">Removed misleading statement about "standards-track" RFCs, as some of the methods registered here indeed originate from Experimental
                RFCs, and furthermore the new registry established in <a href="../../draft-ietf-httpbis/25/p2-semantics.html#method.registry" title="Method Registry">Section 8.1</a> of <a href="#draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics]</cite></a> uses "IETF Review".
             </p>

draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.xml

@@ -87 +87 @@
     There are no security considerations related to the registration itself.
   </t>
+  <t>
+    Security relations applicable to the individual HTTP methods ought to be
+    discussed in the specifications that define them.
+  </t>
 </section>  
 
@@ -449 +453 @@
 <section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14" anchor="changes.since.14">
 <t>
+  Closed issues:
+  <list style="symbols">
+    <t>
+      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/529"/>:
+      "IESG ballot on draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14"
+    </t>
+  </list>
+</t>
+<t>
   Removed misleading statement about "standards-track" RFCs, as some of the 
   methods registered here indeed originate from Experimental RFCs, and furthermore