![(please configure the [header_logo] section in trac.ini)](https://www.ietf.org/images/ietflogotrans.gif)
Changeset 2116 for draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.html
- Timestamp:
- Jan 12, 2013, 12:24:10 AM (7 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
-
draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.html (modified) (11 diffs)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.html
r2110 r2116 449 449 } 450 450 @bottom-center { 451 content: "Expires July 1 5, 2013";451 content: "Expires July 16, 2013"; 452 452 } 453 453 @bottom-right { … … 491 491 <meta name="dct.creator" content="Reschke, J. F."> 492 492 <meta name="dct.identifier" content="urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest"> 493 <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2013-01-1 1">493 <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2013-01-12"> 494 494 <meta name="dct.replaces" content="urn:ietf:rfc:2145"> 495 495 <meta name="dct.replaces" content="urn:ietf:rfc:2616"> … … 520 520 <tr> 521 521 <td class="left">Intended status: Standards Track</td> 522 <td class="right">January 1 1, 2013</td>522 <td class="right">January 12, 2013</td> 523 523 </tr> 524 524 <tr> 525 <td class="left">Expires: July 1 5, 2013</td>525 <td class="left">Expires: July 16, 2013</td> 526 526 <td class="right"></td> 527 527 </tr> … … 551 551 in progress”. 552 552 </p> 553 <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on July 1 5, 2013.</p>553 <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on July 16, 2013.</p> 554 554 <h1><a id="rfc.copyrightnotice" href="#rfc.copyrightnotice">Copyright Notice</a></h1> 555 555 <p>Copyright © 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.</p> … … 647 647 <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.2">6.2</a> <a href="#persistent.establishment">Establishment</a></li> 648 648 <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.3">6.3</a> <a href="#persistent.connections">Persistence</a><ul> 649 <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.1">6.3.1</a> <a href="#p ipelining">Pipelining</a></li>650 <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.2">6.3.2</a> <a href="#p ersistent.retrying.requests">Retrying Requests</a></li>649 <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.1">6.3.1</a> <a href="#persistent.retrying.requests">Retrying Requests</a></li> 650 <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.2">6.3.2</a> <a href="#pipelining">Pipelining</a></li> 651 651 </ul> 652 652 </li> … … 1990 1990 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.7">Clients and servers <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> assume that a persistent connection is maintained for HTTP versions less than 1.1 unless it is explicitly signaled. See <a href="#compatibility.with.http.1.0.persistent.connections" title="Keep-Alive Connections">Appendix A.1.2</a> for more information on backward compatibility with HTTP/1.0 clients. 1991 1991 </p> 1992 <h3 id="rfc.section.6.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.1">6.3.1</a> <a id="pipelining" href="#pipelining">Pipelining</a></h3> 1993 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.1.p.1">A client that supports persistent connections <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> "pipeline" its requests (i.e., send multiple requests without waiting for each response). A server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send its responses to those requests in the same order that the requests were received. 1994 </p> 1995 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.1.p.2">Clients that assume persistent connections and pipeline immediately after connection establishment <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be prepared to retry their connection if the first pipelined attempt fails. If a client does such a retry, it <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> pipeline before it knows the connection is persistent. Clients <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> also be prepared to resend their requests if the server closes the connection before sending all of the corresponding responses. 1996 </p> 1997 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.1.p.3">Clients <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> pipeline requests using non-idempotent request methods or non-idempotent sequences of request methods (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 4.2.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.23"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>). Otherwise, a premature termination of the transport connection could lead to indeterminate results. A client wishing to 1998 send a non-idempotent request <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> wait to send that request until it has received the response status line for the previous request. 1999 </p> 2000 <h3 id="rfc.section.6.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.2">6.3.2</a> <a id="persistent.retrying.requests" href="#persistent.retrying.requests">Retrying Requests</a></h3> 2001 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.p.1">Connections can be closed at any time, with or without intention. Implementations ought to anticipate the need to recover 2002 from asynchronous close events. A client <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> open a new connection and retransmit an aborted sequence of requests without user interaction so long as the request sequence 2003 is idempotent (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 4.2.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.24"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>). A client <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> automatically retry non-idempotent request sequences, although user agents <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> offer a human operator the choice of retrying the request(s). Confirmation by user agent software with semantic understanding 2004 of the application <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> substitute for user confirmation. An automatic retry <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> be repeated if a second sequence of requests fails. 1992 <h3 id="rfc.section.6.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.1">6.3.1</a> <a id="persistent.retrying.requests" href="#persistent.retrying.requests">Retrying Requests</a></h3> 1993 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.1.p.1">Connections can be closed at any time, with or without intention. Implementations ought to anticipate the need to recover 1994 from asynchronous close events. 1995 </p> 1996 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.1.p.2">When an inbound connection is closed prematurely, a client <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> open a new connection and automatically retransmit an aborted sequence of requests if all of those requests have idempotent 1997 methods (<a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 4.2.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.23"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>). A proxy <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> automatically retry non-idempotent requests. 1998 </p> 1999 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.1.p.3">A user agent <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> automatically retry a request with a non-idempotent method unless it has some means to know that the request semantics are 2000 actually idempotent, regardless of the method, or some means to detect that the original request was never applied. For example, 2001 a user agent that knows (through design or configuration) that a POST request to a given resource is safe can repeat that 2002 request automatically. Likewise, a user agent designed specifically to operate on a version control repository might be able 2003 to recover from partial failure conditions by checking the target resource revision(s) after a failed connection, reverting 2004 or fixing any changes that were partially applied, and then automatically retrying the requests that failed. 2005 </p> 2006 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.1.p.4">An automatic retry <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> be repeated if it fails. 2007 </p> 2008 <h3 id="rfc.section.6.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.2">6.3.2</a> <a id="pipelining" href="#pipelining">Pipelining</a></h3> 2009 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.p.1">A client that supports persistent connections <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> "<dfn>pipeline</dfn>" its requests (i.e., send multiple requests without waiting for each response). A server <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> process a sequence of pipelined requests in parallel if they all have safe methods (<a href="p2-semantics.html#safe.methods" title="Safe Methods">Section 4.2.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.24"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>), but <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send the corresponding responses in the same order that the requests were received. 2010 </p> 2011 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.p.2">A client that pipelines requests <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be prepared to retry those requests if the connection closes before it receives all of the corresponding responses. A client 2012 that assumes a persistent connection and pipelines immediately after connection establishment <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> pipeline on a retry connection until it knows the connection is persistent. 2013 </p> 2014 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.p.3">Idempotent methods (<a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 4.2.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.25"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>) are significant to pipelining because they can be automatically retried after a connection failure. A user agent <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> pipeline requests after a non-idempotent method until the final response status code for that method has been received, unless 2015 the user agent has a means to detect and recover from partial failure conditions involving the pipelined sequence. 2016 </p> 2017 <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.p.4">An intermediary that receives pipelined requests <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> pipeline those requests when forwarding them inbound, since it can rely on the outbound user agent(s) to determine what requests 2018 can be safely pipelined. If the inbound connection fails before receiving a response, the pipelining intermediary <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> attempt to retry a sequence of requests that have yet to receive a response if the requests all have idempotent methods; otherwise, 2019 the pipelining intermediary <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> forward any received responses and then close the corresponding outbound connection(s) so that the outbound user agent(s) 2020 can recover accordingly. 2005 2021 </p> 2006 2022 <h2 id="rfc.section.6.4"><a href="#rfc.section.6.4">6.4</a> <a id="persistent.concurrency" href="#persistent.concurrency">Concurrency</a></h2> … … 2095 2111 </p> 2096 2112 <p id="rfc.section.6.7.p.9">The Upgrade header field only applies to switching application-level protocols on the existing connection; it cannot be used 2097 to switch to a protocol on a different connection. For that purpose, it is more appropriate to use a <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.3xx" class="smpl">3xx (Redirection)</a> response (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.3xx" title="Redirection 3xx">Section 6.4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.2 5"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>).2113 to switch to a protocol on a different connection. For that purpose, it is more appropriate to use a <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.3xx" class="smpl">3xx (Redirection)</a> response (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.3xx" title="Redirection 3xx">Section 6.4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.26"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>). 2098 2114 </p> 2099 2115 <p id="rfc.section.6.7.p.10">This specification only defines the protocol name "HTTP" for use by the family of Hypertext Transfer Protocols, as defined … … 2356 2372 <li>Pointer to specification text</li> 2357 2373 </ul> 2358 <p id="rfc.section.7.4.p.3">Names of transfer codings <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> overlap with names of content codings (<a href="p2-semantics.html#content.codings" title="Content Codings">Section 3.1.2.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.2 6"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>) unless the encoding transformation is identical, as is the case for the compression codings defined in <a href="#compression.codings" title="Compression Codings">Section 4.2</a>.2374 <p id="rfc.section.7.4.p.3">Names of transfer codings <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> overlap with names of content codings (<a href="p2-semantics.html#content.codings" title="Content Codings">Section 3.1.2.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.27"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>) unless the encoding transformation is identical, as is the case for the compression codings defined in <a href="#compression.codings" title="Compression Codings">Section 4.2</a>. 2359 2375 </p> 2360 2376 <p id="rfc.section.7.4.p.4">Values to be added to this name space require IETF Review (see <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226#section-4.1">Section 4.1</a> of <a href="#RFC5226" id="rfc.xref.RFC5226.1"><cite title="Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs">[RFC5226]</cite></a>), and <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> conform to the purpose of transfer coding defined in this section. Use of program names for the identification of encoding … … 2481 2497 that most implementations will choose substantially higher limits. 2482 2498 </p> 2483 <p id="rfc.section.8.3.p.3">This specification also provides a way for servers to reject messages that have request-targets that are too long (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 6.5.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.2 7"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>) or request entities that are too large (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.4xx" title="Client Error 4xx">Section 6.5</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.28"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>).2499 <p id="rfc.section.8.3.p.3">This specification also provides a way for servers to reject messages that have request-targets that are too long (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 6.5.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.28"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>) or request entities that are too large (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.4xx" title="Client Error 4xx">Section 6.5</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.29"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[Part2]</cite></a>). 2484 2500 </p> 2485 2501 <p id="rfc.section.8.3.p.4">Recipients <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> carefully limit the extent to which they read other fields, including (but not limited to) request methods, response status … … 3257 3273 </li> 3258 3274 <li><a id="rfc.index.P" href="#rfc.index.P"><b>P</b></a><ul> 3259 <li><em>Part2</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">2.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.3">2.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">2.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.5">2.7.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.8">3.1.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">3.2.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.11">3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">3.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.14">3.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">3.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">3.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.17">4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.18">5.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.20">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.21">5.6</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.22">5.7.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.23">6.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.24">6.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.25">6. 7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.26">7.4</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.27">8.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.28">8.3</a>, <a href="#Part2"><b>10.1</b></a><ul>3275 <li><em>Part2</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">2.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.3">2.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">2.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.5">2.7.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.8">3.1.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">3.2.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.11">3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">3.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.14">3.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">3.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">3.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.17">4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.18">5.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.20">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.21">5.6</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.22">5.7.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.23">6.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.24">6.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.25">6.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.26">6.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.27">7.4</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.28">8.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.29">8.3</a>, <a href="#Part2"><b>10.1</b></a><ul> 3260 3276 <li><em>Section 2</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">2.7</a></li> 3261 3277 <li><em>Section 3</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.14">3.3.2</a></li> 3262 <li><em>Section 3.1.2.1</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">3.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2 6">7.4</a></li>3278 <li><em>Section 3.1.2.1</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">3.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.27">7.4</a></li> 3263 3279 <li><em>Section 3.3</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.22">5.7.2</a></li> 3264 3280 <li><em>Section 4</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.1.1</a></li> 3265 <li><em>Section 4.2.2</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.23">6.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.24">6.3.2</a></li> 3281 <li><em>Section 4.2.1</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.24">6.3.2</a></li> 3282 <li><em>Section 4.2.2</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.23">6.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.25">6.3.2</a></li> 3266 3283 <li><em>Section 4.3.2</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.11">3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">3.3.2</a></li> 3267 3284 <li><em>Section 4.3.6</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">3.3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">5.3</a></li> … … 3271 3288 <li><em>Section 6.2</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.21">5.6</a></li> 3272 3289 <li><em>Section 6.3.4</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.3">2.3</a></li> 3273 <li><em>Section 6.4</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2 5">6.7</a></li>3274 <li><em>Section 6.5</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2 8">8.3</a></li>3275 <li><em>Section 6.5.12</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2 7">8.3</a></li>3290 <li><em>Section 6.4</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.26">6.7</a></li> 3291 <li><em>Section 6.5</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.29">8.3</a></li> 3292 <li><em>Section 6.5.12</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.28">8.3</a></li> 3276 3293 <li><em>Section 7.1.1.2</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">3.2</a></li> 3277 3294 <li><em>Section 8.3</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">3.2.1</a></li>
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.
