Changeset 1870

Timestamp:

06/09/12 12:22:04 (10 years ago)

Author:

julian.reschke@…

Message:

note idempotency of LINK and UNLINK (see #377)

Location:

draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest

Files:

• draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.html (modified) (7 diffs)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.xml (modified) (3 diffs)

draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.html

@@ -422 +422 @@
   } 
   @bottom-center {
-       content: "Expires March 5, 2013"; 
+       content: "Expires March 10, 2013"; 
   } 
   @bottom-right {
@@ -453 +453 @@
       <meta name="dct.creator" content="Reschke, J. F.">
       <meta name="dct.identifier" content="urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-latest">
-      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2012-09-01">
+      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2012-09-06">
       <meta name="dct.abstract" content="This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) methods which have been defined in standards-track RFCs before the IANA HTTP Method Registry was established.">
       <meta name="description" content="This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) methods which have been defined in standards-track RFCs before the IANA HTTP Method Registry was established.">
@@ -470 +470 @@
             <tr>
                <td class="left">Intended status: Informational</td>
-               <td class="right">September 1, 2012</td>
+               <td class="right">September 6, 2012</td>
             </tr>
             <tr>
-               <td class="left">Expires: March 5, 2013</td>
+               <td class="left">Expires: March 10, 2013</td>
                <td class="right"></td>
             </tr>
@@ -499 +499 @@
          in progress”.
       </p>
-      <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on March 5, 2013.</p>
+      <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on March 10, 2013.</p>
       <h1><a id="rfc.copyrightnotice" href="#rfc.copyrightnotice">Copyright Notice</a></h1>
       <p>Copyright © 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.</p>
@@ -659 +659 @@
                   <td class="left">LINK</td>
                   <td class="left">no</td>
-                  <td class="left"></td>
+                  <td class="left">yes</td>
                   <td class="left"><a href="#RFC2068"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a>, <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-19.6.1.2">Section 19.6.1.2</a></td>
                </tr>
@@ -767 +767 @@
                   <td class="left">UNLINK</td>
                   <td class="left">no</td>
-                  <td class="left"></td>
+                  <td class="left">yes</td>
                   <td class="left"><a href="#RFC2068"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a>, <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-19.6.1.3">Section 19.6.1.3</a></td>
                </tr>
@@ -825 +825 @@
       <p id="rfc.section.B.9.p.1">Added itempotency information. Update draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics reference.</p>
       <h2 id="rfc.section.B.10"><a href="#rfc.section.B.10">B.10</a>&nbsp;<a id="changes.since.09" href="#changes.since.09">Since draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-09</a></h2>
-      <p id="rfc.section.B.10.p.1">None yet.</p>
+      <p id="rfc.section.B.10.p.1">Closed issues: </p>
+      <ul>
+         <li> &lt;<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/377">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/377</a>&gt;: "what is the idempotency of LINK and UNLINK?"
+         </li>
+      </ul>
    </body>
 </html>

draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations.xml

@@ -396 +396 @@
 
 <c>LABEL</c><c>no</c><c>yes</c><c><xref target="RFC3253" x:fmt="," x:sec="8.2"/></c>
-<c>LINK</c><c>no</c><c></c><c><xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="," x:sec="19.6.1.2"/></c>
+<c>LINK</c><c>no</c><c>yes</c><c><xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="," x:sec="19.6.1.2"/></c>
 <c>LOCK</c><c>no</c><c>no</c><c><xref target="RFC4918" x:fmt="," x:sec="9.10"/></c>
 
@@ -420 +420 @@
 <c>UNBIND</c><c>no</c><c>yes</c><c><xref target="RFC5842" x:fmt="," x:sec="5"/></c>
 <c>UNCHECKOUT</c><c>no</c><c>yes</c><c><xref target="RFC3253" x:fmt="," x:sec="4.5"/></c>
-<c>UNLINK</c><c>no</c><c></c><c><xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="," x:sec="19.6.1.3"/></c>
+<c>UNLINK</c><c>no</c><c>yes</c><c><xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="," x:sec="19.6.1.3"/></c>
 <c>UNLOCK</c><c>no</c><c>yes</c><c><xref target="RFC4918" x:fmt="," x:sec="9.11"/></c>
 <c>UPDATE</c><c>no</c><c>yes</c><c><xref target="RFC3253" x:fmt="," x:sec="7.1"/></c>
@@ -495 +495 @@
 <section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-09" anchor="changes.since.09">
 <t>
-  None yet.
+  Closed issues:
+  <list style="symbols">
+    <t>
+      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/377"/>:
+      "what is the idempotency of LINK and UNLINK?"
+    </t>
+  </list>
 </t>
 </section>