Changeset 1628


Ignore:
Timestamp:
28/03/12 15:57:43 (11 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:
 
Location:
draft-ietf-httpbis/experiment
Files:
2 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/experiment/p1-messaging.html

    r1627 r1628  
    757757      <p id="rfc.section.1.p.1">The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level request/response protocol that uses extensible semantics and
    758758         MIME-like message payloads for flexible interaction with network-based hypertext information systems. HTTP relies upon the
    759          Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) standard <a href="#RFC3986" id="rfc.xref.RFC3986.1"><cite title="Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax">[RFC3986]</cite></a> to indicate the target resource (<a href="#target-resource" title="Identifying a Target Resource">Section&nbsp;5.1</a>) and relationships between resources. Messages are passed in a format similar to that used by Internet mail <a href="#RFC5322" id="rfc.xref.RFC5322.1"><cite title="Internet Message Format">[RFC5322]</cite></a> and the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) <a href="#RFC2045" id="rfc.xref.RFC2045.1"><cite title="Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies">[RFC2045]</cite></a> (see <a href="p3-payload.html#differences.between.http.and.mime" title="ERROR: Anchor 'differences.between.http.and.mime' not found in p3-payload.xml.">Appendix ERROR: Anchor 'differences.between.http.and.mime' in Part3 not found in source file 'p3-payload.xml'.</a> of <a href="#Part3" id="rfc.xref.Part3.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 3: Message Payload and Content Negotiation">[Part3]</cite></a> for the differences between HTTP and MIME messages).
     759         Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) standard <a href="#RFC3986" id="rfc.xref.RFC3986.1"><cite title="Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax">[RFC3986]</cite></a> to indicate the target resource (<a href="#target-resource" title="Identifying a Target Resource">Section&nbsp;5.1</a>) and relationships between resources. Messages are passed in a format similar to that used by Internet mail <a href="#RFC5322" id="rfc.xref.RFC5322.1"><cite title="Internet Message Format">[RFC5322]</cite></a> and the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) <a href="#RFC2045" id="rfc.xref.RFC2045.1"><cite title="Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies">[RFC2045]</cite></a> (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#differences.between.http.and.mime" title="Differences between HTTP and MIME">Appendix A</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> for the differences between HTTP and MIME messages).
    760760      </p>
    761761      <p id="rfc.section.1.p.2">HTTP is a generic interface protocol for information systems. It is designed to hide the details of how a service is implemented
    … …  
    910910         or an intranet-to-Internet privacy filter. Such transformations are presumed to be desired by the client (or client organization)
    911911         that selected the proxy and are beyond the scope of this specification. However, when a proxy is not intended to transform
    912          a given message, we use the term "<dfn>non-transforming proxy</dfn>" to target requirements that preserve HTTP message semantics. See <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.203" title="203 Non-Authoritative Information">Section 4.4.4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> and <a href="p6-cache.html#header.warning" title="Warning">Section 3.6</a> of <a href="#Part6" id="rfc.xref.Part6.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching">[Part6]</cite></a> for status and warning codes related to transformations.
     912         a given message, we use the term "<dfn>non-transforming proxy</dfn>" to target requirements that preserve HTTP message semantics. See <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.203" title="203 Non-Authoritative Information">Section 4.4.4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.2"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> and <a href="p6-cache.html#header.warning" title="Warning">Section 3.6</a> of <a href="#Part6" id="rfc.xref.Part6.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching">[Part6]</cite></a> for status and warning codes related to transformations.
    913913      </p>
    914914      <p id="rfc.section.2.3.p.7"><span id="rfc.iref.g.13"></span><span id="rfc.iref.r.4"></span>  <span id="rfc.iref.a.1"></span> A "<dfn>gateway</dfn>" (a.k.a., "<dfn>reverse proxy</dfn>") is a receiving agent that acts as a layer above some other server(s) and translates the received requests to the underlying
    … …  
    10781078      </p>
    10791079      <p id="rfc.section.2.7.1.p.6">When an "http" URI is used within a context that calls for access to the indicated resource, a client <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> attempt access by resolving the host to an IP address, establishing a TCP connection to that address on the indicated port,
    1080          and sending an HTTP request message (<a href="#http.message" title="Message Format">Section&nbsp;3</a>) containing the URI's identifying data (<a href="#message.routing" title="Message Routing">Section&nbsp;5</a>) to the server. If the server responds to that request with a non-interim HTTP response message, as described in <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.code.and.reason.phrase" title="Status Code and Reason Phrase">Section 4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.2"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>, then that response is considered an authoritative answer to the client's request.
     1080         and sending an HTTP request message (<a href="#http.message" title="Message Format">Section&nbsp;3</a>) containing the URI's identifying data (<a href="#message.routing" title="Message Routing">Section&nbsp;5</a>) to the server. If the server responds to that request with a non-interim HTTP response message, as described in <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.code.and.reason.phrase" title="Status Code and Reason Phrase">Section 4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.3"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>, then that response is considered an authoritative answer to the client's request.
    10811081      </p>
    10821082      <p id="rfc.section.2.7.1.p.7">Although HTTP is independent of the transport protocol, the "http" scheme is specific to TCP-based services because the name
    … …  
    11741174      </div>
    11751175      <div id="rfc.figure.u.14"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.28"></span>  <a href="#method" class="smpl">method</a>         = <a href="#rule.token.separators" class="smpl">token</a>
    1176 </pre><p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.5">The methods defined by this specification can be found in <a href="p2-semantics.html#methods" title="Methods">Section 2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.3"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>, along with information regarding the HTTP method registry and considerations for defining new methods.
     1176</pre><p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.5">The methods defined by this specification can be found in <a href="p2-semantics.html#methods" title="Methods">Section 2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.4"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>, along with information regarding the HTTP method registry and considerations for defining new methods.
    11771177      </p>
    11781178      <div id="rfc.iref.r.6"></div>
    … …  
    11891189      <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.9">HTTP does not place a pre-defined limit on the length of a request-line. A server that receives a method longer than any that
    11901190         it implements <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> respond with either a 405 (Not Allowed), if it is an origin server, or a 501 (Not Implemented) status code. A server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be prepared to receive URIs of unbounded length and respond with the 414 (URI Too Long) status code if the received request-target
    1191          would be longer than the server wishes to handle (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 4.6.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.4"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
     1191         would be longer than the server wishes to handle (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 4.6.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.5"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
    11921192      </p>
    11931193      <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.10">Various ad-hoc limitations on request-line length are found in practice. It is <em class="bcp14">RECOMMENDED</em> that all HTTP senders and recipients support, at a minimum, request-line lengths of up to 8000 octets.
    … …  
    11991199      <div id="rfc.figure.u.15"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.29"></span>  <a href="#status.line" class="smpl">status-line</a> = <a href="#http.version" class="smpl">HTTP-version</a> <a href="#core.rules" class="smpl">SP</a> <a href="#status-code" class="smpl">status-code</a> <a href="#core.rules" class="smpl">SP</a> <a href="#reason-phrase" class="smpl">reason-phrase</a> <a href="#core.rules" class="smpl">CRLF</a>
    12001200</pre><div id="status-code">
    1201          <p id="rfc.section.3.1.2.p.3">The status-code element is a 3-digit integer result code of the attempt to understand and satisfy the request. See <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.code.and.reason.phrase" title="Status Code and Reason Phrase">Section 4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.5"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> for further information, such as the list of status codes defined by this specification, the IANA registry, and considerations
     1201         <p id="rfc.section.3.1.2.p.3">The status-code element is a 3-digit integer result code of the attempt to understand and satisfy the request. See <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.code.and.reason.phrase" title="Status Code and Reason Phrase">Section 4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.6"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> for further information, such as the list of status codes defined by this specification, the IANA registry, and considerations
    12021202            for new status codes.
    12031203         </p>
    … …  
    12231223                 ; see <a href="#field.parsing" title="Field Parsing">Section&nbsp;3.2.2</a>
    12241224</pre><p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.3">The field-name token labels the corresponding field-value as having the semantics defined by that header field. For example,
    1225          the Date header field is defined in <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" title="Date">Section 11.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.6"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> as containing the origination timestamp for the message in which it appears.
     1225         the Date header field is defined in <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" title="Date">Section 11.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.7"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> as containing the origination timestamp for the message in which it appears.
    12261226      </p>
    12271227      <p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.4">HTTP header fields are fully extensible: there is no limit on the introduction of new field names, each presumably defining
    … …  
    12311231         them.
    12321232      </p>
    1233       <p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.5">New HTTP header fields <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be registered with IANA according to the procedures in <a href="p2-semantics.html#considerations.for.creating.header.fields" title="Considerations for Creating Header Fields">Section 3.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.7"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>. Unrecognized header fields <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be forwarded by a proxy unless the field-name is listed in the Connection header field (<a href="#header.connection" id="rfc.xref.header.connection.3" title="Connection">Section&nbsp;6.1</a>) or the proxy is specifically configured to block or otherwise transform such fields. Unrecognized header fields <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be ignored by other recipients.
     1233      <p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.5">New HTTP header fields <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be registered with IANA according to the procedures in <a href="p2-semantics.html#considerations.for.creating.header.fields" title="Considerations for Creating Header Fields">Section 3.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.8"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>. Unrecognized header fields <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be forwarded by a proxy unless the field-name is listed in the Connection header field (<a href="#header.connection" id="rfc.xref.header.connection.3" title="Connection">Section&nbsp;6.1</a>) or the proxy is specifically configured to block or otherwise transform such fields. Unrecognized header fields <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be ignored by other recipients.
    12341234      </p>
    12351235      <p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.6">The order in which header fields with differing field names are received is not significant. However, it is "good practice"
    … …  
    14181418      <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.6">If more than one Transfer-Encoding header field is present in a message, the multiple field-values <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be combined into one field-value, according to the algorithm defined in <a href="#header.fields" title="Header Fields">Section&nbsp;3.2</a>, before determining the message body length.
    14191419      </p>
    1420       <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.7">Unlike Content-Encoding (<a href="p3-payload.html#content.codings" title="ERROR: Anchor 'content.codings' not found in p3-payload.xml.">Appendix ERROR: Anchor 'content.codings' in Part3 not found in source file 'p3-payload.xml'.</a> of <a href="#Part3" id="rfc.xref.Part3.2"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 3: Message Payload and Content Negotiation">[Part3]</cite></a>), Transfer-Encoding is a property of the message, not of the payload, and thus <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be added or removed by any implementation along the request/response chain. Additional information about the encoding parameters <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be provided by other header fields not defined by this specification.
     1420      <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.7">Unlike Content-Encoding (<a href="p2-semantics.html#content.codings" title="Content Codings">Section 7.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.9"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>), Transfer-Encoding is a property of the message, not of the payload, and thus <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be added or removed by any implementation along the request/response chain. Additional information about the encoding parameters <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be provided by other header fields not defined by this specification.
    14211421      </p>
    14221422      <p id="rfc.section.3.3.1.p.8">Transfer-Encoding <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be sent in a response to a HEAD request or in a 304 response to a GET request, neither of which includes a message body, to
    … …  
    17251725      </p>
    17261726      <h3 id="rfc.section.4.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.4.3.1">4.3.1</a>&nbsp;<a id="quality.values" href="#quality.values">Quality Values</a></h3>
    1727       <p id="rfc.section.4.3.1.p.1">Both transfer codings (TE request header field, <a href="#header.te" id="rfc.xref.header.te.3" title="TE">Section&nbsp;4.3</a>) and content negotiation (<a href="p3-payload.html#content.negotiation" title="ERROR: Anchor 'content.negotiation' not found in p3-payload.xml.">Appendix ERROR: Anchor 'content.negotiation' in Part3 not found in source file 'p3-payload.xml'.</a> of <a href="#Part3" id="rfc.xref.Part3.3"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 3: Message Payload and Content Negotiation">[Part3]</cite></a>) use short "floating point" numbers to indicate the relative importance ("weight") of various negotiable parameters. A weight
     1727      <p id="rfc.section.4.3.1.p.1">Both transfer codings (TE request header field, <a href="#header.te" id="rfc.xref.header.te.3" title="TE">Section&nbsp;4.3</a>) and content negotiation (<a href="p2-semantics.html#content.negotiation" title="Content Negotiation">Section 10</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.10"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) use short "floating point" numbers to indicate the relative importance ("weight") of various negotiable parameters. A weight
    17281728         is normalized to a real number in the range 0 through 1, where 0 is the minimum and 1 the maximum value. If a parameter has
    17291729         a quality value of 0, then content with this parameter is "not acceptable" for the client. HTTP/1.1 applications <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> generate more than three digits after the decimal point. User configuration of these values <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> also be limited in this fashion.
    … …  
    17671767      </p>
    17681768      <p id="rfc.section.5.1.p.2">HTTP communication is initiated by a user agent for some purpose. The purpose is a combination of request semantics, which
    1769          are defined in <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.8"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>, and a target resource upon which to apply those semantics. A URI reference (<a href="#uri" title="Uniform Resource Identifiers">Section&nbsp;2.7</a>) is typically used as an identifier for the "target resource", which a user agent would resolve to its absolute form in order
     1769         are defined in <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.11"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>, and a target resource upon which to apply those semantics. A URI reference (<a href="#uri" title="Uniform Resource Identifiers">Section&nbsp;2.7</a>) is typically used as an identifier for the "target resource", which a user agent would resolve to its absolute form in order
    17701770         to obtain the "target URI". The target URI excludes the reference's fragment identifier component, if any, since fragment
    17711771         identifiers are reserved for client-side processing (<a href="#RFC3986" id="rfc.xref.RFC3986.18"><cite title="Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax">[RFC3986]</cite></a>, <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5">Section 3.5</a>).
    … …  
    18261826      </p>
    18271827      <div id="authority-form">
    1828          <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.13"><span id="rfc.iref.a.3"></span> The authority-form of request-target is only used for CONNECT requests (<a href="p2-semantics.html#CONNECT" title="CONNECT">Section 2.3.8</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.9"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). When making a CONNECT request to establish a tunnel through one or more proxies, a client <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send only the target URI's authority component (excluding any userinfo) as the request-target. For example,
     1828         <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.13"><span id="rfc.iref.a.3"></span> The authority-form of request-target is only used for CONNECT requests (<a href="p2-semantics.html#CONNECT" title="CONNECT">Section 2.3.8</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.12"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). When making a CONNECT request to establish a tunnel through one or more proxies, a client <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send only the target URI's authority component (excluding any userinfo) as the request-target. For example,
    18291829         </p>
    18301830      </div>
    18311831      <div id="rfc.figure.u.49"></div><pre class="text2">CONNECT www.example.com:80 HTTP/1.1
    18321832</pre><div id="asterisk-form">
    1833          <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.15"><span id="rfc.iref.a.4"></span> The asterisk-form of request-target is only used for a server-wide OPTIONS request (<a href="p2-semantics.html#OPTIONS" title="OPTIONS">Section 2.3.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.10"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). When a client wishes to request OPTIONS for the server as a whole, as opposed to a specific named resource of that server,
     1833         <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.15"><span id="rfc.iref.a.4"></span> The asterisk-form of request-target is only used for a server-wide OPTIONS request (<a href="p2-semantics.html#OPTIONS" title="OPTIONS">Section 2.3.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.13"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). When a client wishes to request OPTIONS for the server as a whole, as opposed to a specific named resource of that server,
    18341834            the client <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send only "*" (%x2A) as the request-target. For example,
    18351835         </p>
    … …  
    19861986         </p>
    19871987      </div>
    1988       <p id="rfc.section.5.6.2.p.8">A non-transforming proxy <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> preserve the message payload (<a href="#Part3" id="rfc.xref.Part3.4"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 3: Message Payload and Content Negotiation">[Part3]</cite></a>), though it <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> change the message body through application or removal of a transfer-coding (<a href="#transfer.codings" title="Transfer Codings">Section&nbsp;4</a>).
     1988      <p id="rfc.section.5.6.2.p.8">A non-transforming proxy <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> preserve the message payload (<a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.14"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>), though it <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> change the message body through application or removal of a transfer-coding (<a href="#transfer.codings" title="Transfer Codings">Section&nbsp;4</a>).
    19891989      </p>
    19901990      <h2 id="rfc.section.5.7"><a href="#rfc.section.5.7">5.7</a>&nbsp;<a id="associating.response.to.request" href="#associating.response.to.request">Associating a Response to a Request</a></h2>
    … …  
    19921992         messages. Hence, it relies on the order of response arrival to correspond exactly to the order in which requests are made
    19931993         on the same connection. More than one response message per request only occurs when one or more informational responses (1xx,
    1994          see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.1xx" title="Informational 1xx">Section 4.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.11"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) precede a final response to the same request.
     1994         see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.1xx" title="Informational 1xx">Section 4.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.15"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) precede a final response to the same request.
    19951995      </p>
    19961996      <p id="rfc.section.5.7.p.2">A client that uses persistent connections and sends more than one request per connection <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> maintain a list of outstanding requests in the order sent on that connection and <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> associate each received response message to the highest ordered request that has not yet received a final (non-1xx) response.
    … …  
    21372137      <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.2.p.2">Clients which assume persistent connections and pipeline immediately after connection establishment <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be prepared to retry their connection if the first pipelined attempt fails. If a client does such a retry, it <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> pipeline before it knows the connection is persistent. Clients <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> also be prepared to resend their requests if the server closes the connection before sending all of the corresponding responses.
    21382138      </p>
    2139       <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.2.p.3">Clients <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> pipeline requests using non-idempotent request methods or non-idempotent sequences of request methods (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 2.1.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.12"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). Otherwise, a premature termination of the transport connection could lead to indeterminate results. A client wishing to
     2139      <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.2.p.3">Clients <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> pipeline requests using non-idempotent request methods or non-idempotent sequences of request methods (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 2.1.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.16"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). Otherwise, a premature termination of the transport connection could lead to indeterminate results. A client wishing to
    21402140         send a non-idempotent request <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> wait to send that request until it has received the response status line for the previous request.
    21412141      </p>
    … …  
    21672167      <h3 id="rfc.section.6.3.4"><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.4">6.3.4</a>&nbsp;<a id="persistent.retrying.requests" href="#persistent.retrying.requests">Retrying Requests</a></h3>
    21682168      <p id="rfc.section.6.3.4.p.1">Senders can close the transport connection at any time. Therefore, clients, servers, and proxies <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be able to recover from asynchronous close events. Client software <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> reopen the transport connection and retransmit the aborted sequence of requests without user interaction so long as the request
    2169          sequence is idempotent (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 2.1.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.13"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). Non-idempotent request methods or sequences <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be automatically retried, although user agents <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> offer a human operator the choice of retrying the request(s). Confirmation by user-agent software with semantic understanding
     2169         sequence is idempotent (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 2.1.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.17"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). Non-idempotent request methods or sequences <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be automatically retried, although user agents <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> offer a human operator the choice of retrying the request(s). Confirmation by user-agent software with semantic understanding
    21702170         of the application <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> substitute for user confirmation. The automatic retry <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> be repeated if the second sequence of requests fails.
    21712171      </p>
    … …  
    21802180      </p>
    21812181      <h3 id="rfc.section.6.4.3"><a href="#rfc.section.6.4.3">6.4.3</a>&nbsp;<a id="use.of.the.100.status" href="#use.of.the.100.status">Use of the 100 (Continue) Status</a></h3>
    2182       <p id="rfc.section.6.4.3.p.1">The purpose of the 100 (Continue) status code (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.100" title="100 Continue">Section 4.3.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.14"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) is to allow a client that is sending a request message with a request body to determine if the origin server is willing
     2182      <p id="rfc.section.6.4.3.p.1">The purpose of the 100 (Continue) status code (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.100" title="100 Continue">Section 4.3.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.18"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) is to allow a client that is sending a request message with a request body to determine if the origin server is willing
    21832183         to accept the request (based on the request header fields) before the client sends the request body. In some cases, it might
    21842184         either be inappropriate or highly inefficient for the client to send the body if the server will reject the message without
    … …  
    21872187      <p id="rfc.section.6.4.3.p.2">Requirements for HTTP/1.1 clients: </p>
    21882188      <ul>
    2189          <li>If a client will wait for a 100 (Continue) response before sending the request body, it <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send an Expect header field (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.expect" title="Expect">Section 11.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.15"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) with the "100-continue" expectation.
    2190          </li>
    2191          <li>A client <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> send an Expect header field (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.expect" title="Expect">Section 11.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.16"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) with the "100-continue" expectation if it does not intend to send a request body.
     2189         <li>If a client will wait for a 100 (Continue) response before sending the request body, it <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send an Expect header field (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.expect" title="Expect">Section 11.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.19"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) with the "100-continue" expectation.
     2190         </li>
     2191         <li>A client <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> send an Expect header field (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.expect" title="Expect">Section 11.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.20"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) with the "100-continue" expectation if it does not intend to send a request body.
    21922192         </li>
    21932193      </ul>
    … …  
    22332233         <li>A proxy <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> forward a 100 (Continue) response if the request message was received from an HTTP/1.0 (or earlier) client and did not include
    22342234            an Expect header field with the "100-continue" expectation. This requirement overrides the general rule for forwarding of
    2235             1xx responses (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.1xx" title="Informational 1xx">Section 4.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.17"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
     2235            1xx responses (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.1xx" title="Informational 1xx">Section 4.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.21"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
    22362236         </li>
    22372237      </ul>
    … …  
    22702270      </p>
    22712271      <p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.8">The Upgrade header field cannot be used to indicate a switch to a protocol on a different connection. For that purpose, it
    2272          is more appropriate to use a 3xx redirection response (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.3xx" title="Redirection 3xx">Section 4.5</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.18"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
     2272         is more appropriate to use a 3xx redirection response (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.3xx" title="Redirection 3xx">Section 4.5</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.22"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
    22732273      </p>
    22742274      <p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.9">Servers <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> include the "Upgrade" header field in 101 (Switching Protocols) responses to indicate which protocol(s) are being switched
    … …  
    25342534         <li>Pointer to specification text</li>
    25352535      </ul>
    2536       <p id="rfc.section.7.4.p.3">Names of transfer codings <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> overlap with names of content codings (<a href="p3-payload.html#content.codings" title="ERROR: Anchor 'content.codings' not found in p3-payload.xml.">Appendix ERROR: Anchor 'content.codings' in Part3 not found in source file 'p3-payload.xml'.</a> of <a href="#Part3" id="rfc.xref.Part3.5"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 3: Message Payload and Content Negotiation">[Part3]</cite></a>) unless the encoding transformation is identical, as it is the case for the compression codings defined in <a href="#compression.codings" title="Compression Codings">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>.
     2536      <p id="rfc.section.7.4.p.3">Names of transfer codings <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> overlap with names of content codings (<a href="p2-semantics.html#content.codings" title="Content Codings">Section 7.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.23"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) unless the encoding transformation is identical, as it is the case for the compression codings defined in <a href="#compression.codings" title="Compression Codings">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>.
    25372537      </p>
    25382538      <p id="rfc.section.7.4.p.4">Values to be added to this name space require IETF Review (see <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226#section-4.1">Section 4.1</a> of <a href="#RFC5226" id="rfc.xref.RFC5226.1"><cite title="Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs">[RFC5226]</cite></a>), and <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> conform to the purpose of transfer coding defined in this section.
    … …  
    26942694         that most implementations will choose substantially higher limits.
    26952695      </p>
    2696       <p id="rfc.section.8.6.p.3">This specification also provides a way for servers to reject messages that have request-targets that are too long (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 4.6.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.19"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) or request entities that are too large (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.4xx" title="Client Error 4xx">Section 4.6</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.20"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
     2696      <p id="rfc.section.8.6.p.3">This specification also provides a way for servers to reject messages that have request-targets that are too long (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 4.6.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.24"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) or request entities that are too large (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.4xx" title="Client Error 4xx">Section 4.6</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.25"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
    26972697      </p>
    26982698      <p id="rfc.section.8.6.p.4">Other fields (including but not limited to request methods, response status phrases, header field-names, and body chunks) <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be limited by implementations carefully, so as to not impede interoperability.
    … …  
    27382738      <h2 id="rfc.references.1"><a href="#rfc.section.10.1" id="rfc.section.10.1">10.1</a> Normative References
    27392739      </h2>
    2740       <table>                     
     2740      <table>                   
    27412741         <tr>
    27422742            <td class="reference"><b id="ISO-8859-1">[ISO-8859-1]</b></td>
    … …  
    27462746            <td class="reference"><b id="Part2">[Part2]</b></td>
    27472747            <td class="top"><a href="mailto:fielding@gbiv.com" title="Adobe Systems Incorporated">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a href="mailto:ylafon@w3.org" title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a href="mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de" title="greenbytes GmbH">J. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest">HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest (work in progress), March&nbsp;2012.
    2748             </td>
    2749          </tr>
    2750          <tr>
    2751             <td class="reference"><b id="Part3">[Part3]</b></td>
    2752             <td class="top"><a href="mailto:fielding@gbiv.com" title="Adobe Systems Incorporated">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a href="mailto:ylafon@w3.org" title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a href="mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de" title="greenbytes GmbH">J. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-latest">HTTP/1.1, part 3: Message Payload and Content Negotiation</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-latest (work in progress), March&nbsp;2012.
    27532748            </td>
    27542749         </tr>
    … …  
    37503745            <li><a id="rfc.index.P" href="#rfc.index.P"><b>P</b></a><ul>
    37513746                  <li><em>Pad1995</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Pad1995.1">6.3.1</a>, <a href="#Pad1995"><b>10.2</b></a></li>
    3752                   <li><em>Part2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">2.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">2.7.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.3">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.5">3.1.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.8">5.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.11">5.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">6.3.2.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">6.3.4</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.14">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.17">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.18">6.5</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">8.6</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.20">8.6</a>, <a href="#Part2"><b>10.1</b></a><ul>
    3753                         <li><em>Section 2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.3">3.1.1</a></li>
    3754                         <li><em>Section 2.1.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">6.3.2.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">6.3.4</a></li>
    3755                         <li><em>Section 2.3.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">5.3</a></li>
    3756                         <li><em>Section 2.3.8</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">5.3</a></li>
    3757                         <li><em>Section 3.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.2</a></li>
    3758                         <li><em>Section 4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">2.7.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.5">3.1.2</a></li>
    3759                         <li><em>Section 4.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.11">5.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.17">6.4.3</a></li>
    3760                         <li><em>Section 4.3.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.14">6.4.3</a></li>
    3761                         <li><em>Section 4.4.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">2.3</a></li>
    3762                         <li><em>Section 4.5</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.18">6.5</a></li>
    3763                         <li><em>Section 4.6</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.20">8.6</a></li>
    3764                         <li><em>Section 4.6.12</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">8.6</a></li>
    3765                         <li><em>Section 11.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.2</a></li>
    3766                         <li><em>Section 11.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">6.4.3</a></li>
    3767                      </ul>
    3768                   </li>
    3769                   <li><em>Part3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part3.1">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part3.2">3.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part3.3">4.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part3.4">5.6.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part3.5">7.4</a>, <a href="#Part3"><b>10.1</b></a><ul>
    3770                         <li><em>Appendix </em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part3.1">1</a></li>
    3771                         <li><em>Appendix </em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part3.2">3.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part3.5">7.4</a></li>
    3772                         <li><em>Appendix </em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part3.3">4.3.1</a></li>
     3747                  <li><em>Part2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">2.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.3">2.7.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.5">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.1.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.8">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">3.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">4.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.11">5.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.14">5.6.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">5.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">6.3.2.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.17">6.3.4</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.18">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.20">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.21">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.22">6.5</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.23">7.4</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.24">8.6</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.25">8.6</a>, <a href="#Part2"><b>10.1</b></a><ul>
     3748                        <li><em>Section 2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">3.1.1</a></li>
     3749                        <li><em>Section 2.1.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">6.3.2.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.17">6.3.4</a></li>
     3750                        <li><em>Section 2.3.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">5.3</a></li>
     3751                        <li><em>Section 2.3.8</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">5.3</a></li>
     3752                        <li><em>Section 3.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.8">3.2</a></li>
     3753                        <li><em>Section 4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.3">2.7.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.1.2</a></li>
     3754                        <li><em>Section 4.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">5.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.21">6.4.3</a></li>
     3755                        <li><em>Section 4.3.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.18">6.4.3</a></li>
     3756                        <li><em>Section 4.4.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">2.3</a></li>
     3757                        <li><em>Section 4.5</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.22">6.5</a></li>
     3758                        <li><em>Section 4.6</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.25">8.6</a></li>
     3759                        <li><em>Section 4.6.12</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.5">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.24">8.6</a></li>
     3760                        <li><em>Section 7.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">3.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.23">7.4</a></li>
     3761                        <li><em>Section 10</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">4.3.1</a></li>
     3762                        <li><em>Section 11.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.2</a></li>
     3763                        <li><em>Section 11.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.20">6.4.3</a></li>
     3764                        <li><em>Appendix A</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">1</a></li>
    37733765                     </ul>
    37743766                  </li>

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/experiment/p1-messaging.xml

    r1625 r1628  
    1818  <!ENTITY caching-overview       "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#caching.overview' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    1919  <!ENTITY cache-incomplete       "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#response.cacheability' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    20   <!ENTITY payload                "<xref target='Part3' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    21   <!ENTITY media-types            "<xref target='Part3' x:rel='#media.types' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    22   <!ENTITY content-codings        "<xref target='Part3' x:rel='#content.codings' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
     20  <!ENTITY payload                "<xref target='Part2' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
     21  <!ENTITY media-types            "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#media.types' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
     22  <!ENTITY content-codings        "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#content.codings' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    2323  <!ENTITY CONNECT                "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#CONNECT' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    24   <!ENTITY content.negotiation    "<xref target='Part3' x:rel='#content.negotiation' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    25   <!ENTITY diff-mime              "<xref target='Part3' x:rel='#differences.between.http.and.mime' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    26   <!ENTITY representation         "<xref target='Part3' x:rel='#representation' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
     24  <!ENTITY content.negotiation    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#content.negotiation' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
     25  <!ENTITY diff-mime              "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#differences.between.http.and.mime' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
     26  <!ENTITY representation         "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#representation' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    2727  <!ENTITY header-cache-control   "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.cache-control' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    2828  <!ENTITY header-date            "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.date' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    2929  <!ENTITY header-expect          "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.expect' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    30   <!ENTITY header-mime-version    "<xref target='Part3' x:rel='#mime-version' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
     30  <!ENTITY header-mime-version    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#mime-version' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    3131  <!ENTITY header-pragma          "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.pragma' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    3232  <!ENTITY header-warning         "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.warning' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
    … …  
    40944094</reference>
    40954095
    4096 <reference anchor="Part3">
    4097   <front>
    4098     <title abbrev="HTTP/1.1">HTTP/1.1, part 3: Message Payload and Content Negotiation</title>
    4099     <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
    4100       <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
    4101       <address><email>fielding@gbiv.com</email></address>
    4102     </author>
    4103     <author initials="Y." surname="Lafon" fullname="Yves Lafon" role="editor">
    4104       <organization abbrev="W3C">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
    4105       <address><email>ylafon@w3.org</email></address>
    4106     </author>
    4107     <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
    4108       <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
    4109       <address><email>julian.reschke@greenbytes.de</email></address>
    4110     </author>
    4111     <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
    4112   </front>
    4113   <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-&ID-VERSION;"/>
    4114   <x:source href="p3-payload.xml" basename="p3-payload"/>
    4115 </reference>
    4116 
    41174096<reference anchor="Part6">
    41184097  <front>
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.