Ignore:
Timestamp:
28/03/12 11:29:44 (11 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

fix broken inter-document links, regen HTML

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed

  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.html

    r1617 r1625  
    460460  }
    461461  @bottom-center {
    462        content: "Expires September 27, 2012";
     462       content: "Expires September 29, 2012";
    463463  }
    464464  @bottom-right {
    … …  
    502502      <meta name="dct.creator" content="Reschke, J. F.">
    503503      <meta name="dct.identifier" content="urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest">
    504       <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2012-03-26">
     504      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2012-03-28">
    505505      <meta name="dct.replaces" content="urn:ietf:rfc:2145">
    506506      <meta name="dct.replaces" content="urn:ietf:rfc:2616">
    … …  
    534534            </tr>
    535535            <tr>
    536                <td class="left">Expires: September 27, 2012</td>
     536               <td class="left">Expires: September 29, 2012</td>
    537537               <td class="right">greenbytes</td>
    538538            </tr>
    539539            <tr>
    540540               <td class="left"></td>
    541                <td class="right">March 26, 2012</td>
     541               <td class="right">March 28, 2012</td>
    542542            </tr>
    543543         </tbody>
    … …  
    572572         in progress”.
    573573      </p>
    574       <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on September 27, 2012.</p>
     574      <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on September 29, 2012.</p>
    575575      <h1><a id="rfc.copyrightnotice" href="#rfc.copyrightnotice">Copyright Notice</a></h1>
    576576      <p>Copyright © 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.</p>
    … …  
    910910         or an intranet-to-Internet privacy filter. Such transformations are presumed to be desired by the client (or client organization)
    911911         that selected the proxy and are beyond the scope of this specification. However, when a proxy is not intended to transform
    912          a given message, we use the term "<dfn>non-transforming proxy</dfn>" to target requirements that preserve HTTP message semantics. See <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.203" title="203 Non-Authoritative Information">Section 7.2.4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> and <a href="p6-cache.html#header.warning" title="Warning">Section 3.6</a> of <a href="#Part6" id="rfc.xref.Part6.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching">[Part6]</cite></a> for status and warning codes related to transformations.
     912         a given message, we use the term "<dfn>non-transforming proxy</dfn>" to target requirements that preserve HTTP message semantics. See <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.203" title="203 Non-Authoritative Information">Section 4.4.4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> and <a href="p6-cache.html#header.warning" title="Warning">Section 3.6</a> of <a href="#Part6" id="rfc.xref.Part6.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching">[Part6]</cite></a> for status and warning codes related to transformations.
    913913      </p>
    914914      <p id="rfc.section.2.3.p.7"><span id="rfc.iref.g.13"></span><span id="rfc.iref.r.4"></span>  <span id="rfc.iref.a.1"></span> A "<dfn>gateway</dfn>" (a.k.a., "<dfn>reverse proxy</dfn>") is a receiving agent that acts as a layer above some other server(s) and translates the received requests to the underlying
    … …  
    11741174      </div>
    11751175      <div id="rfc.figure.u.14"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.28"></span>  <a href="#method" class="smpl">method</a>         = <a href="#rule.token.separators" class="smpl">token</a>
    1176 </pre><p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.5">The methods defined by this specification can be found in <a href="p2-semantics.html#method" title="Method">Section 2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.3"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>, along with information regarding the HTTP method registry and considerations for defining new methods.
     1176</pre><p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.5">The methods defined by this specification can be found in <a href="p2-semantics.html#methods" title="Methods">Section 2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.3"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>, along with information regarding the HTTP method registry and considerations for defining new methods.
    11771177      </p>
    11781178      <div id="rfc.iref.r.6"></div>
    … …  
    11891189      <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.9">HTTP does not place a pre-defined limit on the length of a request-line. A server that receives a method longer than any that
    11901190         it implements <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> respond with either a 405 (Not Allowed), if it is an origin server, or a 501 (Not Implemented) status code. A server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be prepared to receive URIs of unbounded length and respond with the 414 (URI Too Long) status code if the received request-target
    1191          would be longer than the server wishes to handle (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 7.4.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.4"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
     1191         would be longer than the server wishes to handle (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 4.6.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.4"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
    11921192      </p>
    11931193      <p id="rfc.section.3.1.1.p.10">Various ad-hoc limitations on request-line length are found in practice. It is <em class="bcp14">RECOMMENDED</em> that all HTTP senders and recipients support, at a minimum, request-line lengths of up to 8000 octets.
    … …  
    12231223                 ; see <a href="#field.parsing" title="Field Parsing">Section&nbsp;3.2.2</a>
    12241224</pre><p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.3">The field-name token labels the corresponding field-value as having the semantics defined by that header field. For example,
    1225          the Date header field is defined in <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" title="Date">Section 9.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.6"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> as containing the origination timestamp for the message in which it appears.
     1225         the Date header field is defined in <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" title="Date">Section 7.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.6"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a> as containing the origination timestamp for the message in which it appears.
    12261226      </p>
    12271227      <p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.4">HTTP header fields are fully extensible: there is no limit on the introduction of new field names, each presumably defining
    … …  
    18261826      </p>
    18271827      <div id="authority-form">
    1828          <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.13"><span id="rfc.iref.a.3"></span> The authority-form of request-target is only used for CONNECT requests (<a href="p2-semantics.html#CONNECT" title="CONNECT">Section 6.9</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.9"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). When making a CONNECT request to establish a tunnel through one or more proxies, a client <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send only the target URI's authority component (excluding any userinfo) as the request-target. For example,
     1828         <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.13"><span id="rfc.iref.a.3"></span> The authority-form of request-target is only used for CONNECT requests (<a href="p2-semantics.html#CONNECT" title="CONNECT">Section 2.3.8</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.9"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). When making a CONNECT request to establish a tunnel through one or more proxies, a client <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send only the target URI's authority component (excluding any userinfo) as the request-target. For example,
    18291829         </p>
    18301830      </div>
    18311831      <div id="rfc.figure.u.49"></div><pre class="text2">CONNECT www.example.com:80 HTTP/1.1
    18321832</pre><div id="asterisk-form">
    1833          <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.15"><span id="rfc.iref.a.4"></span> The asterisk-form of request-target is only used for a server-wide OPTIONS request (<a href="p2-semantics.html#OPTIONS" title="OPTIONS">Section 6.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.10"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). When a client wishes to request OPTIONS for the server as a whole, as opposed to a specific named resource of that server,
     1833         <p id="rfc.section.5.3.p.15"><span id="rfc.iref.a.4"></span> The asterisk-form of request-target is only used for a server-wide OPTIONS request (<a href="p2-semantics.html#OPTIONS" title="OPTIONS">Section 2.3.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.10"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). When a client wishes to request OPTIONS for the server as a whole, as opposed to a specific named resource of that server,
    18341834            the client <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send only "*" (%x2A) as the request-target. For example,
    18351835         </p>
    … …  
    19921992         messages. Hence, it relies on the order of response arrival to correspond exactly to the order in which requests are made
    19931993         on the same connection. More than one response message per request only occurs when one or more informational responses (1xx,
    1994          see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.1xx" title="Informational 1xx">Section 7.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.11"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) precede a final response to the same request.
     1994         see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.1xx" title="Informational 1xx">Section 4.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.11"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) precede a final response to the same request.
    19951995      </p>
    19961996      <p id="rfc.section.5.7.p.2">A client that uses persistent connections and sends more than one request per connection <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> maintain a list of outstanding requests in the order sent on that connection and <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> associate each received response message to the highest ordered request that has not yet received a final (non-1xx) response.
    … …  
    21372137      <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.2.p.2">Clients which assume persistent connections and pipeline immediately after connection establishment <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be prepared to retry their connection if the first pipelined attempt fails. If a client does such a retry, it <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> pipeline before it knows the connection is persistent. Clients <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> also be prepared to resend their requests if the server closes the connection before sending all of the corresponding responses.
    21382138      </p>
    2139       <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.2.p.3">Clients <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> pipeline requests using non-idempotent request methods or non-idempotent sequences of request methods (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 6.1.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.12"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). Otherwise, a premature termination of the transport connection could lead to indeterminate results. A client wishing to
     2139      <p id="rfc.section.6.3.2.2.p.3">Clients <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> pipeline requests using non-idempotent request methods or non-idempotent sequences of request methods (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 2.1.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.12"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). Otherwise, a premature termination of the transport connection could lead to indeterminate results. A client wishing to
    21402140         send a non-idempotent request <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> wait to send that request until it has received the response status line for the previous request.
    21412141      </p>
    … …  
    21672167      <h3 id="rfc.section.6.3.4"><a href="#rfc.section.6.3.4">6.3.4</a>&nbsp;<a id="persistent.retrying.requests" href="#persistent.retrying.requests">Retrying Requests</a></h3>
    21682168      <p id="rfc.section.6.3.4.p.1">Senders can close the transport connection at any time. Therefore, clients, servers, and proxies <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be able to recover from asynchronous close events. Client software <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> reopen the transport connection and retransmit the aborted sequence of requests without user interaction so long as the request
    2169          sequence is idempotent (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 6.1.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.13"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). Non-idempotent request methods or sequences <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be automatically retried, although user agents <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> offer a human operator the choice of retrying the request(s). Confirmation by user-agent software with semantic understanding
     2169         sequence is idempotent (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#idempotent.methods" title="Idempotent Methods">Section 2.1.2</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.13"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>). Non-idempotent request methods or sequences <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be automatically retried, although user agents <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> offer a human operator the choice of retrying the request(s). Confirmation by user-agent software with semantic understanding
    21702170         of the application <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> substitute for user confirmation. The automatic retry <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> be repeated if the second sequence of requests fails.
    21712171      </p>
    … …  
    21802180      </p>
    21812181      <h3 id="rfc.section.6.4.3"><a href="#rfc.section.6.4.3">6.4.3</a>&nbsp;<a id="use.of.the.100.status" href="#use.of.the.100.status">Use of the 100 (Continue) Status</a></h3>
    2182       <p id="rfc.section.6.4.3.p.1">The purpose of the 100 (Continue) status code (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.100" title="100 Continue">Section 7.1.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.14"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) is to allow a client that is sending a request message with a request body to determine if the origin server is willing
     2182      <p id="rfc.section.6.4.3.p.1">The purpose of the 100 (Continue) status code (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.100" title="100 Continue">Section 4.3.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.14"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) is to allow a client that is sending a request message with a request body to determine if the origin server is willing
    21832183         to accept the request (based on the request header fields) before the client sends the request body. In some cases, it might
    21842184         either be inappropriate or highly inefficient for the client to send the body if the server will reject the message without
    … …  
    21872187      <p id="rfc.section.6.4.3.p.2">Requirements for HTTP/1.1 clients: </p>
    21882188      <ul>
    2189          <li>If a client will wait for a 100 (Continue) response before sending the request body, it <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send an Expect header field (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.expect" title="Expect">Section 9.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.15"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) with the "100-continue" expectation.
    2190          </li>
    2191          <li>A client <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> send an Expect header field (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.expect" title="Expect">Section 9.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.16"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) with the "100-continue" expectation if it does not intend to send a request body.
     2189         <li>If a client will wait for a 100 (Continue) response before sending the request body, it <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send an Expect header field (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.expect" title="Expect">Section 7.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.15"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) with the "100-continue" expectation.
     2190         </li>
     2191         <li>A client <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> send an Expect header field (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.expect" title="Expect">Section 7.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.16"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) with the "100-continue" expectation if it does not intend to send a request body.
    21922192         </li>
    21932193      </ul>
    … …  
    22332233         <li>A proxy <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> forward a 100 (Continue) response if the request message was received from an HTTP/1.0 (or earlier) client and did not include
    22342234            an Expect header field with the "100-continue" expectation. This requirement overrides the general rule for forwarding of
    2235             1xx responses (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.1xx" title="Informational 1xx">Section 7.1</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.17"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
     2235            1xx responses (see <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.1xx" title="Informational 1xx">Section 4.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.17"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
    22362236         </li>
    22372237      </ul>
    … …  
    22702270      </p>
    22712271      <p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.8">The Upgrade header field cannot be used to indicate a switch to a protocol on a different connection. For that purpose, it
    2272          is more appropriate to use a 3xx redirection response (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.3xx" title="Redirection 3xx">Section 7.3</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.18"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
     2272         is more appropriate to use a 3xx redirection response (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.3xx" title="Redirection 3xx">Section 4.5</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.18"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
    22732273      </p>
    22742274      <p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.9">Servers <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> include the "Upgrade" header field in 101 (Switching Protocols) responses to indicate which protocol(s) are being switched
    … …  
    26942694         that most implementations will choose substantially higher limits.
    26952695      </p>
    2696       <p id="rfc.section.8.6.p.3">This specification also provides a way for servers to reject messages that have request-targets that are too long (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 7.4.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.19"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) or request entities that are too large (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.4xx" title="Client Error 4xx">Section 7.4</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.20"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
     2696      <p id="rfc.section.8.6.p.3">This specification also provides a way for servers to reject messages that have request-targets that are too long (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.414" title="414 URI Too Long">Section 4.6.12</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.19"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>) or request entities that are too large (<a href="p2-semantics.html#status.4xx" title="Client Error 4xx">Section 4.6</a> of <a href="#Part2" id="rfc.xref.Part2.20"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics">[Part2]</cite></a>).
    26972697      </p>
    26982698      <p id="rfc.section.8.6.p.4">Other fields (including but not limited to request methods, response status phrases, header field-names, and body chunks) <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be limited by implementations carefully, so as to not impede interoperability.
    … …  
    37523752                  <li><em>Part2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">2.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">2.7.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.3">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.5">3.1.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.8">5.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">5.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.11">5.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">6.3.2.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">6.3.4</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.14">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.17">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.18">6.5</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">8.6</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.20">8.6</a>, <a href="#Part2"><b>10.1</b></a><ul>
    37533753                        <li><em>Section 2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.3">3.1.1</a></li>
     3754                        <li><em>Section 2.1.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">6.3.2.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">6.3.4</a></li>
     3755                        <li><em>Section 2.3.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">5.3</a></li>
     3756                        <li><em>Section 2.3.8</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">5.3</a></li>
    37543757                        <li><em>Section 3.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.7">3.2</a></li>
    37553758                        <li><em>Section 4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.2">2.7.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.5">3.1.2</a></li>
    3756                         <li><em>Section 6.1.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.12">6.3.2.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.13">6.3.4</a></li>
    3757                         <li><em>Section 6.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.10">5.3</a></li>
    3758                         <li><em>Section 6.9</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.9">5.3</a></li>
    3759                         <li><em>Section 7.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.11">5.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.17">6.4.3</a></li>
    3760                         <li><em>Section 7.1.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.14">6.4.3</a></li>
    3761                         <li><em>Section 7.2.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">2.3</a></li>
    3762                         <li><em>Section 7.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.18">6.5</a></li>
    3763                         <li><em>Section 7.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.20">8.6</a></li>
    3764                         <li><em>Section 7.4.12</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">8.6</a></li>
    3765                         <li><em>Section 9.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.2</a></li>
    3766                         <li><em>Section 9.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">6.4.3</a></li>
     3759                        <li><em>Section 4.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.11">5.7</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.17">6.4.3</a></li>
     3760                        <li><em>Section 4.3.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.14">6.4.3</a></li>
     3761                        <li><em>Section 4.4.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.1">2.3</a></li>
     3762                        <li><em>Section 4.5</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.18">6.5</a></li>
     3763                        <li><em>Section 4.6</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.20">8.6</a></li>
     3764                        <li><em>Section 4.6.12</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.4">3.1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.19">8.6</a></li>
     3765                        <li><em>Section 7.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.6">3.2</a></li>
     3766                        <li><em>Section 7.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.15">6.4.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part2.16">6.4.3</a></li>
    37673767                     </ul>
    37683768                  </li>
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.