Ignore:
Timestamp:
01/03/11 09:24:49 (12 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

bump up document dates, update to latest version of rfc2629.xslt

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp.xml

    r1144 r1145  
    4242  </author>
    4343
    44   <date month="February" year="2011"/>
     44  <date month="March" year="2011"/>
    4545  <workgroup>HTTPbis Working Group</workgroup>
    4646 
     
    764764<section title="Implementations (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)" anchor="alternatives.implementations">
    765765<t>
    766   Unfortunately, as of February 2011, neither the encoding defined in RFCs 2231
     766  Unfortunately, as of March 2011, neither the encoding defined in RFCs 2231
    767767  and 5987, nor any of the alternate approaches discussed above was
    768768  implemented interoperably. Thus, this specification recommends the approach
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.