Changeset 1134 for draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp.html

Timestamp:

21/02/11 13:29:47 (12 years ago)

Author:

julian.reschke@…

Message:

give the reader an early hint about when 'inline' can be useful

File:

• draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp.html (modified) (1 diff)

draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp/latest/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp.html

@@ -599 +599 @@
          to save the response locally, rather than process it normally (as per its media type).
       </p>
-      <p id="rfc.section.4.2.p.2">On the other hand, if it matches "inline" (case-insensitively), this implies default processing.</p>
+      <p id="rfc.section.4.2.p.2">On the other hand, if it matches "inline" (case-insensitively), this implies default processing. Therefore, the disposition
+         type "inline" is only useful when it is augmented with additional parameters, such as the filename (see below).
+      </p>
       <p id="rfc.section.4.2.p.3">Unknown or unhandled disposition types <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be handled by recipients the same way as "attachment" (see also <a href="#RFC2183" id="rfc.xref.RFC2183.2"><cite title="Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition Header Field">[RFC2183]</cite></a>, <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2183#section-2.8">Section 2.8</a>).
       </p>