Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 14, 2010, 5:01:48 AM (9 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Message:

Use consistent syntax when talking about RFCs in prose (not references)

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.xml

    r1001 r1002  
    48904890</t>
    48914891<t>
    4892   Update use of abs_path production from RFC1808 to the path-absolute + query
    4893   components of RFC3986.
     4892  Update use of abs_path production from RFC 1808 to the path-absolute + query
     4893  components of RFC 3986.
    48944894  (<xref target="request-target"/>)
    48954895</t>
     
    51245124<section title="Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)" anchor="change.log">
    51255125
    5126 <section title="Since RFC2616">
     5126<section title="Since RFC 2616">
    51275127<t>
    51285128  Extracted relevant partitions from <xref target="RFC2616"/>.
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.