source: wg_materials/interim0113/agenda.txt @ 2154

Last change on this file since 2154 was 2154, checked in by mnot@…, 7 years ago

add presentation from James

File size: 2.8 KB
Line 
1Agenda - HTTPbis Interim Meeting
2================================
3
4Tokyo, Japan  January 30-February 1, 2013
5
6[Arrangements](http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/F2F/Jan13)
7[Issues List](http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/21)
8[Current Draft](http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2)
9
10* January 30: 9am - 5pm
11* January 31: 9am - 5pm
12* February 1: 9am - 1pm
13
14
15Introduction
16------------
17
18- Blue sheets
19- Scribe selection
20- NOTE WELL
21- Meeting format, goals
22- Agenda bashing
23
24
25HTTP/2 Draft Status
26-------------------
27
28The editors (Alexey and Martin) will summarise their current status and
29plans for editorial work.
30
31
32HTTP/2 Issues
33-------------
34
35### Upgrade
36
37We've delegated TLS upgrade to the TLSWG, and have a plan of action for
38HTTP to use the Upgrade mechanism defined by HTTP/1.1, possibly augmented
39by hints in DNS and response headers.
40
41We currently have a proposal for the details of the upgrade, as well as a
42DNS hint proposal. Discussion will focus around these.
43
44- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-montenegro-httpbis-http2-negotiation
45- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
46
47
48### Header Compression
49
50SPDY3's header compression has an identified security issue, so we've
51been evaluating potential alternatives. Discussion will centre around the
52specifics of these proposals, the criteria we'll use for selecting one, and
53the general approach that HTTP/2 takes to header compression.
54
55- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rpeon-httpbis-header-compression
56- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe
57- http://http2.github.com/http_samples/mnot/
58- [Presentation from James Snell](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1x8GvY-7FJi57DW9vSvjTF1QnTkzM18mXi_LQUUprZeo/view)
59
60### Flow Control
61
62We'll discuss Gabriel's draft of general principles for flow control, and
63how best to reflect it in the draft.
64
65- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-montenegro-httpbis-http2-fc-principles
66
67
68### Frame Sizes
69
70SDPY3 has a data frame with a maximum size of 16MB. Some implementers have
71mentioned that this limits the use of sendfile() with large files; we'll
72discuss whether to include a "jumbo" frame size (as well as other sizes,
73depending on their use cases).
74
75
76### Prioritisation
77
78We'll start discussion of the prioritisation mechanism, with the aim of
79identifying specific issues and/or changes to make.
80
81[Presentation by Will Chan](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1OfgPJsW6P7pky5PiyEzBNZnf5dWXq-y19ReSSg6BIeM/edit#slide=id.p)
82
83### Other Issues and Deliverables
84
85Discussion of other potential issues (editorial or design), additional
86deliverables, etc.
87
88
89Implementation and Testing
90--------------------------
91
92Based upon the progress we make (or fail to), we'll attempt to sketch out
93a plan for proofs-of-concept, implementation and interoperability testing.
94
95
96Wrap-up
97-------
98
99- Review of Action Items
100- Next Steps
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.