1 | # HTTPbis Working Group Agenda - IETF 87 |
---|
2 | |
---|
3 | - Meeting chat: <xmpp:httpbis@jabber.ietf.org?join> |
---|
4 | - Minutes: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/minutes> |
---|
5 | |
---|
6 | ## WEDNESDAY 31 July 2013 - 1510-1720 Afternoon Session II/III |
---|
7 | |
---|
8 | ### Potsdam 2: HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 |
---|
9 | |
---|
10 | * 1 min - Blue sheets / scribe selection |
---|
11 | * 4 min - Agenda bashing |
---|
12 | * 30 min - HTTP/1.x |
---|
13 | - draft -23 changes [Julian Reschke] |
---|
14 | - WGLC summary |
---|
15 | - Issue discussion |
---|
16 | * 85 min - HTTP/2.x |
---|
17 | - San Francisco Interim meeting summary |
---|
18 | - Draft changes and open questions [Martin Thomson] |
---|
19 | - Implementation Status summary |
---|
20 | - update from TLS WG |
---|
21 | - Issue discussion |
---|
22 | |
---|
23 | |
---|
24 | ## FRIDAY 2 August 2013 - 0900-1100 Morning Session I |
---|
25 | |
---|
26 | ### Bellevue: HTTP/2 and Transport Joint Meeting |
---|
27 | |
---|
28 | * 1 min - Blue sheets / scribe selection |
---|
29 | * 4 min - Agenda bashing |
---|
30 | * 20 min - HTTP/2 With A Transport Eye [Allison Mankin] |
---|
31 | * 20 min - Flow Control |
---|
32 | HTTP2 does flow control on top of TCP; in particular, how does HTTP2 |
---|
33 | mitigate pain from shrinking and sometimes zeroing the flow control windows? |
---|
34 | Also, which entities are advised to use and which to not use flow control? |
---|
35 | * 20 min - Priorities |
---|
36 | What is the relationship between HTTP priorities and QoS (or lack thereof)? |
---|
37 | * 20 min - Initial Congestion Window |
---|
38 | Previous versions of HTTP/2 (and SPDY) experimented with storing the |
---|
39 | congestion window size to reuse in future connections. This has been |
---|
40 | recently removed, but discussion may still be helpful. |
---|
41 | * 35 min - General Discussion / Other Issues |
---|