source: draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p4-conditional.html @ 2734

Last change on this file since 2734 was 2734, checked in by julian.reschke@…, 6 years ago

update XSLTs, switch to Saxon 9.6 HE in Makefile, regen specs

  • Property svn:eol-style set to native
  • Property svn:mime-type set to text/html;charset=utf-8
File size: 118.3 KB
RevLine 
[52]1<!DOCTYPE html
2  PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
3<html lang="en">
[2365]4   <head profile="http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/08/04/dc-html/">
[52]5      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
[1864]6      <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests</title><script>
[1522]7var buttonsAdded = false;
8
[2628]9function initFeedback() {
[1522]10  var fb = document.createElement("div");
[1528]11  fb.className = "feedback noprint";
[1522]12  fb.setAttribute("onclick", "feedback();");
13  fb.appendChild(document.createTextNode("feedback"));
14
[2734]15  document.body.appendChild(fb);
[1522]16}
17
18function feedback() {
19  toggleButtonsToElementsByName("h1");
20  toggleButtonsToElementsByName("h2");
21  toggleButtonsToElementsByName("h3");
22  toggleButtonsToElementsByName("h4");
[2273]23
[1522]24  buttonsAdded = !buttonsAdded;
25}
26
27function toggleButtonsToElementsByName(name) {
28  var list = document.getElementsByTagName(name);
29  for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i++) {
30    toggleButton(list.item(i));
31  }
32}
33
34function toggleButton(node) {
35  if (! buttonsAdded) {
[2273]36
[1522]37    // docname
38    var template = "mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org?subject={docname},%20%22{section}%22&body=<{ref}>:";
39
40    var id = node.getAttribute("id");
41    // better id available?
42    var titlelinks = node.getElementsByTagName("a");
43    for (var i = 0; i < titlelinks.length; i++) {
44      var tl = titlelinks.item(i);
45      if (tl.getAttribute("id")) {
46        id = tl.getAttribute("id");
47      }
48    }
49
50    // ref
51    var ref = window.location.toString();
52    var hash = ref.indexOf("#");
53    if (hash != -1) {
54      ref = ref.substring(0, hash);
55    }
56    if (id != "") {
57      ref += "#" + id;
58    }
[2273]59
[1522]60    // docname
[2724]61    var docname = "draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-latest";
[1522]62
63    // section
64    var section = node.textContent;
[1528]65    section = section.replace("\u00a0", " ");
[2273]66
[1522]67    // build URI from template
68    var uri = template.replace("{docname}", encodeURIComponent(docname));
69    uri = uri.replace("{section}", encodeURIComponent(section));
70    uri = uri.replace("{ref}", encodeURIComponent(ref));
[2273]71
[1522]72    var button = document.createElement("a");
[1528]73    button.className = "fbbutton noprint";
[1522]74    button.setAttribute("href", uri);
75    button.appendChild(document.createTextNode("send feedback"));
76    node.appendChild(button);
77  }
78  else {
79    var buttons = node.getElementsByTagName("a");
80    for (var i = 0; i < buttons.length; i++) {
81      var b = buttons.item(i);
[1528]82      if (b.className == "fbbutton noprint") {
[1522]83        node.removeChild(b);
84      }
85    }
86  }
87}</script><style type="text/css" title="Xml2Rfc (sans serif)">
[52]88a {
89  text-decoration: none;
90}
91a.smpl {
92  color: black;
93}
94a:hover {
95  text-decoration: underline;
96}
97a:active {
98  text-decoration: underline;
99}
100address {
101  margin-top: 1em;
102  margin-left: 2em;
103  font-style: normal;
104}
105body {
106  color: black;
[2734]107  font-family: cambria, georgia, serif;
108  font-size: 12pt;
109  margin: 2em auto;
110  max-width: 1000px;
[52]111}
[2734]112samp, tt, code, pre {
113  font-family: consolas, monaco, monospace;
114}
[52]115cite {
116  font-style: normal;
117}
[563]118div.note {
119  margin-left: 2em;
120}
[52]121dl {
122  margin-left: 2em;
123}
[2734]124dl > dt {
125  float: left;
126  margin-right: 1em;
127}
128dl.nohang > dt {
129  float: none;
130}
131dl > dd {
132  margin-bottom: .5em;
133}
134dl.compact > dd {
135  margin-bottom: .0em;
136}
137dl > dd > dl {
138  margin-top: 0.5em;
139}
[729]140ul.empty {
141  list-style-type: none;
142}
143ul.empty li {
[52]144  margin-top: .5em;
145}
146dl p {
147  margin-left: 0em;
148}
149h1 {
[2418]150  font-size: 130%;
[52]151  line-height: 21pt;
152  page-break-after: avoid;
153}
154h1.np {
155  page-break-before: always;
156}
157h2 {
[2418]158  font-size: 120%;
[52]159  line-height: 15pt;
160  page-break-after: avoid;
161}
[2501]162h3 {
[2418]163  font-size: 110%;
[52]164  page-break-after: avoid;
165}
[2501]166h4, h5, h6 {
167  page-break-after: avoid;
168}
[2418]169h1 a, h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a, h6 a {
[52]170  color: black;
171}
172img {
173  margin-left: 3em;
174}
175li {
176  margin-left: 2em;
177}
178ol {
179  margin-left: 2em;
180}
[1145]181ol.la {
182  list-style-type: lower-alpha;
183}
184ol.ua {
185  list-style-type: upper-alpha;
186}
[52]187ol p {
188  margin-left: 0em;
189}
190p {
191  margin-left: 2em;
192}
193pre {
[2734]194  font-size: 11pt;
[52]195  margin-left: 3em;
196  background-color: lightyellow;
197  padding: .25em;
[1667]198  page-break-inside: avoid;
[52]199}
200pre.text2 {
201  border-style: dotted;
202  border-width: 1px;
203  background-color: #f0f0f0;
204}
205pre.inline {
206  background-color: white;
207  padding: 0em;
[2734]208  page-break-inside: auto;
[52]209}
210pre.text {
211  border-style: dotted;
212  border-width: 1px;
213  background-color: #f8f8f8;
214}
215pre.drawing {
216  border-style: solid;
217  border-width: 1px;
218  background-color: #f8f8f8;
219  padding: 2em;
220}
221table {
222  margin-left: 2em;
223}
[253]224table.tt {
225  vertical-align: top;
[2626]226  border-color: gray;
[253]227}
[2626]228table.tt th {
229  border-color: gray;
230}
231table.tt td {
232  border-color: gray;
233}
234table.all {
235  border-style: solid;
236  border-width: 2px;
237}
[253]238table.full {
[2626]239  border-style: solid;
240  border-width: 2px;
[253]241}
242table.tt td {
243  vertical-align: top;
244}
[2626]245table.all td {
246  border-style: solid;
247  border-width: 1px;
248}
[253]249table.full td {
[2626]250  border-style: none solid;
[253]251  border-width: 1px;
252}
253table.tt th {
254  vertical-align: top;
255}
[2626]256table.all th {
257  border-style: solid;
[253]258  border-width: 1px;
259}
[2626]260table.full th {
261  border-style: solid;
262  border-width: 1px 1px 2px 1px;
263}
[253]264table.headers th {
[2626]265  border-style: none none solid none;
266  border-width: 2px;
[253]267}
[675]268table.left {
269  margin-right: auto;
270}
271table.right {
272  margin-left: auto;
273}
274table.center {
275  margin-left: auto;
276  margin-right: auto;
277}
[454]278caption {
279  caption-side: bottom;
280  font-weight: bold;
[2418]281  font-size: 10pt;
[454]282  margin-top: .5em;
283}
284
[52]285table.header {
[729]286  border-spacing: 1px;
[52]287  width: 95%;
[2418]288  font-size: 11pt;
[52]289  color: white;
290}
291td.top {
292  vertical-align: top;
293}
294td.topnowrap {
295  vertical-align: top;
[2273]296  white-space: nowrap;
[52]297}
[729]298table.header td {
[52]299  background-color: gray;
300  width: 50%;
301}
[729]302table.header a {
[227]303  color: white;
304}
[52]305td.reference {
306  vertical-align: top;
307  white-space: nowrap;
308  padding-right: 1em;
309}
310thead {
311  display:table-header-group;
312}
[1072]313ul.toc, ul.toc ul {
[52]314  list-style: none;
315  margin-left: 1.5em;
316  padding-left: 0em;
317}
[1072]318ul.toc li {
[52]319  line-height: 150%;
320  font-weight: bold;
321  margin-left: 0em;
322}
[1072]323ul.toc li li {
[52]324  line-height: normal;
325  font-weight: normal;
[2734]326  font-size: 11pt;
[52]327  margin-left: 0em;
328}
[1072]329li.excluded {
[52]330  font-size: 0pt;
331}
332ul p {
333  margin-left: 0em;
334}
[2418]335.title, .filename, h1, h2, h3, h4 {
[2734]336  font-family: candara, calibri, segoe, optima, arial, sans-serif;
[2418]337}
[1095]338ul.ind, ul.ind ul {
[52]339  list-style: none;
340  margin-left: 1.5em;
341  padding-left: 0em;
[440]342  page-break-before: avoid;
[52]343}
[1072]344ul.ind li {
[52]345  font-weight: bold;
346  line-height: 200%;
347  margin-left: 0em;
348}
[1072]349ul.ind li li {
[52]350  font-weight: normal;
351  line-height: 150%;
352  margin-left: 0em;
353}
[2734]354.avoidbreakinside {
[662]355  page-break-inside: avoid;
356}
[2734]357.avoidbreakafter {
358  page-break-after: avoid;
359}
[52]360.bcp14 {
361  font-style: normal;
362  text-transform: lowercase;
363  font-variant: small-caps;
364}
365.comment {
366  background-color: yellow;
367}
368.center {
369  text-align: center;
370}
371.error {
372  color: red;
373  font-style: italic;
374  font-weight: bold;
375}
376.figure {
377  font-weight: bold;
378  text-align: center;
[2418]379  font-size: 10pt;
[52]380}
381.filename {
382  color: #333333;
[2418]383  font-size: 75%;
[52]384  font-weight: bold;
385  line-height: 21pt;
386  text-align: center;
387}
388.fn {
389  font-weight: bold;
390}
391.left {
392  text-align: left;
393}
394.right {
395  text-align: right;
396}
397.title {
[2418]398  color: green;
399  font-size: 150%;
[52]400  line-height: 18pt;
401  font-weight: bold;
402  text-align: center;
403  margin-top: 36pt;
404}
405.warning {
[2418]406  font-size: 130%;
[52]407  background-color: yellow;
[2734]408}.feedback {
[1522]409  position: fixed;
410  bottom: 1%;
411  right: 1%;
412  padding: 3px 5px;
413  color: white;
414  border-radius: 5px;
[2734]415  background: #006400;
[1522]416  border: 1px solid silver;
[2734]417  -webkit-user-select: none;
418  -moz-user-select: none;
419  -ms-user-select: none;
[1522]420}
421.fbbutton {
422  margin-left: 1em;
423  color: #303030;
424  font-size: small;
425  font-weight: normal;
426  background: #d0d000;
427  padding: 1px 4px;
428  border: 1px solid silver;
429  border-radius: 5px;
430}
[52]431
[2734]432@media screen {
433  pre.text, pre.text2 {
434    width: 69em;
435  }
436}
437
[52]438@media print {
439  .noprint {
440    display: none;
441  }
[2273]442
[52]443  a {
444    color: black;
445    text-decoration: none;
446  }
447
448  table.header {
449    width: 90%;
450  }
451
452  td.header {
453    width: 50%;
454    color: black;
455    background-color: white;
456    vertical-align: top;
[2418]457    font-size: 110%;
[52]458  }
459
[2734]460  ul.toc a:last-child::after {
[52]461    content: leader('.') target-counter(attr(href), page);
462  }
[2273]463
[1072]464  ul.ind li li a {
[52]465    content: target-counter(attr(href), page);
466  }
[2273]467
[2734]468  pre {
469    font-size: 10pt;
470  }
471
[52]472  .print2col {
473    column-count: 2;
[1528]474    -moz-column-count: 2;
[52]475    column-fill: auto;
476  }
477}
478
479@page {
480  @top-left {
[2724]481       content: "Internet-Draft";
[2273]482  }
[52]483  @top-right {
[2707]484       content: "June 2014";
[2273]485  }
[52]486  @top-center {
[2273]487       content: "HTTP/1.1 Conditional Requests";
488  }
[52]489  @bottom-left {
[2273]490       content: "Fielding & Reschke";
491  }
[52]492  @bottom-center {
[2734]493       content: "Expires December 2014";
[2273]494  }
[52]495  @bottom-right {
[2273]496       content: "[Page " counter(page) "]";
497  }
[52]498}
499
[2273]500@page:first {
[52]501    @top-left {
502      content: normal;
503    }
504    @top-right {
505      content: normal;
506    }
507    @top-center {
508      content: normal;
509    }
510}
511</style><link rel="Contents" href="#rfc.toc">
512      <link rel="Author" href="#rfc.authors">
[754]513      <link rel="Copyright" href="#rfc.copyrightnotice">
[52]514      <link rel="Index" href="#rfc.index">
515      <link rel="Chapter" title="1 Introduction" href="#rfc.section.1">
[1381]516      <link rel="Chapter" title="2 Validators" href="#rfc.section.2">
[1253]517      <link rel="Chapter" title="3 Precondition Header Fields" href="#rfc.section.3">
518      <link rel="Chapter" title="4 Status Code Definitions" href="#rfc.section.4">
[2361]519      <link rel="Chapter" title="5 Evaluation" href="#rfc.section.5">
520      <link rel="Chapter" title="6 Precedence" href="#rfc.section.6">
521      <link rel="Chapter" title="7 IANA Considerations" href="#rfc.section.7">
522      <link rel="Chapter" title="8 Security Considerations" href="#rfc.section.8">
523      <link rel="Chapter" title="9 Acknowledgments" href="#rfc.section.9">
524      <link rel="Chapter" href="#rfc.section.10" title="10 References">
[912]525      <link rel="Appendix" title="A Changes from RFC 2616" href="#rfc.section.A">
[1805]526      <link rel="Appendix" title="B Imported ABNF" href="#rfc.section.B">
527      <link rel="Appendix" title="C Collected ABNF" href="#rfc.section.C">
[2723]528      <link rel="Alternate" title="RFC7232" href="http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/specs/rfc7232.html">
[1810]529      <link href="p2-semantics.html" rel="prev">
[1472]530      <link href="p5-range.html" rel="next">
[2734]531      <meta name="generator" content="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629.xslt, Revision 1.710, 2014/12/09 13:12:18, XSLT vendor: Saxonica http://www.saxonica.com/">
[2662]532      <meta name="keywords" content="Hypertext Transfer Protocol, HTTP, HTTP conditional requests">
[754]533      <link rel="schema.dct" href="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
534      <meta name="dct.creator" content="Fielding, R.">
535      <meta name="dct.creator" content="Reschke, J. F.">
[2724]536      <meta name="dct.identifier" content="urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-latest">
[2734]537      <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2014-06">
[754]538      <meta name="dct.replaces" content="urn:ietf:rfc:2616">
[2554]539      <meta name="dct.abstract" content="The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a stateless application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document defines HTTP/1.1 conditional requests, including metadata header fields for indicating state changes, request header fields for making preconditions on such state, and rules for constructing the responses to a conditional request when one or more preconditions evaluate to false.">
540      <meta name="description" content="The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a stateless application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document defines HTTP/1.1 conditional requests, including metadata header fields for indicating state changes, request header fields for making preconditions on such state, and rules for constructing the responses to a conditional request when one or more preconditions evaluate to false.">
[52]541   </head>
[2628]542   <body onload="initFeedback();">
[2734]543      <table class="header" id="rfc.headerblock">
[729]544         <tbody>
545            <tr>
[2724]546               <td class="left">HTTPbis Working Group</td>
[729]547               <td class="right">R. Fielding, Editor</td>
548            </tr>
549            <tr>
[2724]550               <td class="left">Internet-Draft</td>
[1106]551               <td class="right">Adobe</td>
[729]552            </tr>
553            <tr>
[2724]554               <td class="left">Obsoletes: <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616">2616</a> (if approved)
555               </td>
[1917]556               <td class="right">J. Reschke, Editor</td>
[729]557            </tr>
558            <tr>
[2724]559               <td class="left">Intended status: Standards Track</td>
[729]560               <td class="right">greenbytes</td>
561            </tr>
562            <tr>
[2734]563               <td class="left">Expires: December 2014</td>
564               <td class="right">June 2014</td>
[729]565            </tr>
566         </tbody>
[52]567      </table>
[2734]568      <p class="title" id="rfc.title">Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests<br><span class="filename">draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-latest</span></p>
[2723]569      <p style="color: green; text-align: center; font-size: 14pt; background-color: yellow;"><b>Note:</b> a later version of this document has been published as <a href="http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/specs/rfc7232.html">RFC7232</a>.
570         
571      </p>
[2273]572      <h1 id="rfc.abstract"><a href="#rfc.abstract">Abstract</a></h1>
[2734]573      <p>The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a stateless application-level protocol for
574         distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document defines HTTP/1.1
575         conditional requests, including metadata header fields for indicating state changes,
576         request header fields for making preconditions on such state, and rules for constructing
577         the responses to a conditional request when one or more preconditions evaluate to
578         false.
[2273]579      </p>
580      <h1 id="rfc.note.1"><a href="#rfc.note.1">Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)</a></h1>
[2734]581      <p>Discussion of this draft takes place on the HTTPBIS working group mailing list (ietf-http-wg@w3.org),
582         which is archived at &lt;<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/</a>&gt;.
[2273]583      </p>
[1268]584      <p>The current issues list is at &lt;<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/3">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/3</a>&gt; and related documents (including fancy diffs) can be found at &lt;<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/</a>&gt;.
[2273]585      </p>
[2734]586      <p><em>This is a temporary document for the purpose of tracking the editorial changes made
587            during the AUTH48 (RFC publication) phase.</em>
[2273]588      </p>
[2418]589      <div id="rfc.status">
590         <h1><a href="#rfc.status">Status of This Memo</a></h1>
[2734]591         <p>This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78
592            and BCP 79.
[2418]593         </p>
[2734]594         <p>Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
595            Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The
596            list of current Internet-Drafts is at <a href="http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/">http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/</a>.
[2418]597         </p>
[2734]598         <p>Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated,
599            replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use
600            Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress”.
601         </p>
602         <p>This Internet-Draft will expire in December 2014.</p>
[2418]603      </div>
604      <div id="rfc.copyrightnotice">
605         <h1><a href="#rfc.copyrightnotice">Copyright Notice</a></h1>
[2734]606         <p>Copyright © 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All
607            rights reserved.
[2418]608         </p>
[2734]609         <p>This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating
610            to IETF Documents (<a href="http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info">http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info</a>) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents
611            carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.
612            Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
613            as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
614            warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
[2418]615         </p>
[2734]616         <p>This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published
617            or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the
618            copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to
619            allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining
620            an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials,
621            this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative
622            works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
623            it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.
624         </p>
[2418]625      </div>
[52]626      <hr class="noprint">
[2734]627      <div id="rfc.toc">
628         <h1 class="np"><a href="#rfc.toc">Table of Contents</a></h1>
629         <ul class="toc">
630            <li><a href="#rfc.section.1">1.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a><ul>
631                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#conformance">Conformance and Error Handling</a></li>
632                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.1.2">1.2</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#notation">Syntax Notation</a></li>
633               </ul>
634            </li>
635            <li><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#validators">Validators</a><ul>
636                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.1">2.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#weak.and.strong.validators">Weak versus Strong</a></li>
637                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.2">2.2</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#header.last-modified">Last-Modified</a><ul>
638                        <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.2.1">2.2.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#lastmod.generation">Generation</a></li>
639                        <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.2.2">2.2.2</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#lastmod.comparison">Comparison</a></li>
640                     </ul>
641                  </li>
642                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3">2.3</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#header.etag">ETag</a><ul>
643                        <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.1">2.3.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#entity.tag.generation">Generation</a></li>
644                        <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2">2.3.2</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#entity.tag.comparison">Comparison</a></li>
645                        <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.3">2.3.3</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#example.entity.tag.vs.conneg">Example: Entity-Tags Varying on Content-Negotiated Resources</a></li>
646                     </ul>
647                  </li>
648                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.2.4">2.4</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#when.to.use.entity.tags.and.last-modified.dates">When to Use Entity-Tags and Last-Modified Dates</a></li>
649               </ul>
650            </li>
651            <li><a href="#rfc.section.3">3.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#preconditions">Precondition Header Fields</a><ul>
652                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.1">3.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-match">If-Match</a></li>
653                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.2">3.2</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-none-match">If-None-Match</a></li>
654                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.3">3.3</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-modified-since">If-Modified-Since</a></li>
655                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.4">3.4</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-unmodified-since">If-Unmodified-Since</a></li>
656                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.5">3.5</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-range">If-Range</a></li>
657               </ul>
658            </li>
659            <li><a href="#rfc.section.4">4.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#status.code.definitions">Status Code Definitions</a><ul>
660                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.4.1">4.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#status.304">304 Not Modified</a></li>
661                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.4.2">4.2</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#status.412">412 Precondition Failed</a></li>
662               </ul>
663            </li>
664            <li><a href="#rfc.section.5">5.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#evaluation">Evaluation</a></li>
665            <li><a href="#rfc.section.6">6.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#precedence">Precedence</a></li>
666            <li><a href="#rfc.section.7">7.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#IANA.considerations">IANA Considerations</a><ul>
667                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.7.1">7.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#status.code.registration">Status Code Registration</a></li>
668                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.7.2">7.2</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#header.field.registration">Header Field Registration</a></li>
669               </ul>
670            </li>
671            <li><a href="#rfc.section.8">8.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#security.considerations">Security Considerations</a></li>
672            <li><a href="#rfc.section.9">9.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#acks">Acknowledgments</a></li>
673            <li><a href="#rfc.section.10">10.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.references">References</a><ul>
674                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.10.1">10.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.references.1">Normative References</a></li>
675                  <li><a href="#rfc.section.10.2">10.2</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.references.2">Informative References</a></li>
676               </ul>
677            </li>
678            <li><a href="#rfc.section.A">A.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#changes.from.rfc.2616">Changes from RFC 2616</a></li>
679            <li><a href="#rfc.section.B">B.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#imported.abnf">Imported ABNF</a></li>
680            <li><a href="#rfc.section.C">C.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#collected.abnf">Collected ABNF</a></li>
681            <li><a href="#rfc.index">Index</a></li>
682            <li><a href="#rfc.authors">Authors' Addresses</a></li>
683         </ul>
684      </div>
[2418]685      <div id="introduction">
686         <h1 id="rfc.section.1" class="np"><a href="#rfc.section.1">1.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></h1>
[2734]687         <div id="rfc.section.1.p.1">
688            <p>Conditional requests are HTTP requests <a href="#RFC7231" id="rfc.xref.RFC7231.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[RFC7231]</cite></a> that include one or more header fields indicating a precondition to be tested before
689               applying the method semantics to the target resource. This document defines the HTTP/1.1
690               conditional request mechanisms in terms of the architecture, syntax notation, and
691               conformance criteria defined in <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a>.
[2418]692            </p>
[2734]693         </div>
694         <div id="rfc.section.1.p.2">
695            <p>Conditional GET requests are the most efficient mechanism for HTTP cache updates <a href="#RFC7234" id="rfc.xref.RFC7234.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching">[RFC7234]</cite></a>. Conditionals can also be applied to state-changing methods, such as PUT and DELETE,
696               to prevent the "lost update" problem: one client accidentally overwriting the work
697               of another client that has been acting in parallel.
[2418]698            </p>
699         </div>
[2734]700         <div id="rfc.section.1.p.3">
701            <p><span id="rfc.iref.s.1"></span> Conditional request preconditions are based on the state of the target resource as
702               a whole (its current value set) or the state as observed in a previously obtained
703               representation (one value in that set). A resource might have multiple current representations,
704               each with its own observable state. The conditional request mechanisms assume that
705               the mapping of requests to a "selected representation" (<a href="p2-semantics.html#representations" title="Representations">Section 3</a> of <a href="#RFC7231" id="rfc.xref.RFC7231.2"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[RFC7231]</cite></a>) will be consistent over time if the server intends to take advantage of conditionals.
706               Regardless, if the mapping is inconsistent and the server is unable to select the
707               appropriate representation, then no harm will result when the precondition evaluates
708               to false.
709            </p>
710         </div>
711         <div id="rfc.section.1.p.4">
712            <p>The conditional request preconditions defined by this specification (<a href="#preconditions" title="Precondition Header Fields">Section&nbsp;3</a>) are evaluated when applicable to the recipient (<a href="#evaluation" title="Evaluation">Section&nbsp;5</a>) according to their order of precedence (<a href="#precedence" title="Precedence">Section&nbsp;6</a>).
713            </p>
714         </div>
715         <div id="conformance">
716            <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a>&nbsp;<a href="#conformance">Conformance and Error Handling</a></h2>
717            <div id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">
718               <p>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD
719                  NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted
720                  as described in <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>.
721               </p>
722            </div>
723            <div id="rfc.section.1.1.p.2">
724               <p>Conformance criteria and considerations regarding error handling are defined in <a href="p1-messaging.html#conformance" title="Conformance and Error Handling">Section 2.5</a> of <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.2"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a>.
725               </p>
726            </div>
727         </div>
[2418]728         <div id="notation">
729            <h2 id="rfc.section.1.2"><a href="#rfc.section.1.2">1.2</a>&nbsp;<a href="#notation">Syntax Notation</a></h2>
[2734]730            <div id="rfc.section.1.2.p.1">
731               <p>This specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation of <a href="#RFC5234" id="rfc.xref.RFC5234.1"><cite title="Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF">[RFC5234]</cite></a> with a list extension, defined in <a href="p1-messaging.html#abnf.extension" title="ABNF List Extension: #rule">Section 7</a> of <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.3"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a>, that allows for compact definition of comma-separated lists using a '#' operator
732                  (similar to how the '*' operator indicates repetition). <a href="#imported.abnf" title="Imported ABNF">Appendix&nbsp;B</a> describes rules imported from other documents. <a href="#collected.abnf" title="Collected ABNF">Appendix&nbsp;C</a> shows the collected grammar with all list operators expanded to standard ABNF notation.
733               </p>
734            </div>
[2418]735         </div>
736      </div>
737      <div id="validators">
738         <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#validators">Validators</a></h1>
[2734]739         <div id="rfc.section.2.p.1">
740            <p>This specification defines two forms of metadata that are commonly used to observe
741               resource state and test for preconditions: modification dates (<a href="#header.last-modified" id="rfc.xref.header.last-modified.1" title="Last-Modified">Section&nbsp;2.2</a>) and opaque entity tags (<a href="#header.etag" id="rfc.xref.header.etag.1" title="ETag">Section&nbsp;2.3</a>). Additional metadata that reflects resource state has been defined by various extensions
742               of HTTP, such as Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV, <a href="#RFC4918" id="rfc.xref.RFC4918.1"><cite title="HTTP Extensions for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)">[RFC4918]</cite></a>), that are beyond the scope of this specification. A resource metadata value is referred
743               to as a "<dfn>validator</dfn>" when it is used within a precondition.
744            </p>
745         </div>
[2418]746         <div id="weak.and.strong.validators">
747            <h2 id="rfc.section.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.1">2.1</a>&nbsp;<a href="#weak.and.strong.validators">Weak versus Strong</a></h2>
[2734]748            <div id="rfc.section.2.1.p.1">
749               <p>Validators come in two flavors: strong or weak. Weak validators are easy to generate
750                  but are far less useful for comparisons. Strong validators are ideal for comparisons
751                  but can be very difficult (and occasionally impossible) to generate efficiently. Rather
752                  than impose that all forms of resource adhere to the same strength of validator, HTTP
753                  exposes the type of validator in use and imposes restrictions on when weak validators
754                  can be used as preconditions.
[2418]755               </p>
[2734]756            </div>
757            <div id="rfc.section.2.1.p.2">
758               <p>A "strong validator" is representation metadata that changes value whenever a change
759                  occurs to the representation data that would be observable in the payload body of
760                  a <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.200" class="smpl">200 (OK)</a> response to GET.
[2418]761               </p>
[2734]762            </div>
763            <div id="rfc.section.2.1.p.3">
764               <p>A strong validator might change for reasons other than a change to the representation
765                  data, such as when a semantically significant part of the representation metadata
766                  is changed (e.g., <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.content-type" class="smpl">Content-Type</a>), but it is in the best interests of the origin server to only change the value when
767                  it is necessary to invalidate the stored responses held by remote caches and authoring
768                  tools.
[2418]769               </p>
[2734]770            </div>
771            <div id="rfc.section.2.1.p.4">
772               <p>Cache entries might persist for arbitrarily long periods, regardless of expiration
773                  times. Thus, a cache might attempt to validate an entry using a validator that it
774                  obtained in the distant past. A strong validator is unique across all versions of
775                  all representations associated with a particular resource over time. However, there
776                  is no implication of uniqueness across representations of different resources (i.e.,
777                  the same strong validator might be in use for representations of multiple resources
778                  at the same time and does not imply that those representations are equivalent).
[2418]779               </p>
[2734]780            </div>
781            <div id="rfc.section.2.1.p.5">
782               <p>There are a variety of strong validators used in practice. The best are based on strict
783                  revision control, wherein each change to a representation always results in a unique
784                  node name and revision identifier being assigned before the representation is made
785                  accessible to GET. A collision-resistant hash function applied to the representation
786                  data is also sufficient if the data is available prior to the response header fields
787                  being sent and the digest does not need to be recalculated every time a validation
788                  request is received. However, if a resource has distinct representations that differ
789                  only in their metadata, such as might occur with content negotiation over media types
790                  that happen to share the same data format, then the origin server needs to incorporate
791                  additional information in the validator to distinguish those representations.
[2418]792               </p>
793            </div>
[2734]794            <div id="rfc.section.2.1.p.6">
795               <p>In contrast, a "weak validator" is representation metadata that might not change for
796                  every change to the representation data. This weakness might be due to limitations
797                  in how the value is calculated, such as clock resolution, an inability to ensure uniqueness
798                  for all possible representations of the resource, or a desire of the resource owner
799                  to group representations by some self-determined set of equivalency rather than unique
800                  sequences of data. An origin server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> change a weak entity-tag whenever it considers prior representations to be unacceptable
801                  as a substitute for the current representation. In other words, a weak entity-tag
802                  ought to change whenever the origin server wants caches to invalidate old responses.
[2418]803               </p>
[2734]804            </div>
805            <div id="rfc.section.2.1.p.7">
806               <p>For example, the representation of a weather report that changes in content every
807                  second, based on dynamic measurements, might be grouped into sets of equivalent representations
808                  (from the origin server's perspective) with the same weak validator in order to allow
809                  cached representations to be valid for a reasonable period of time (perhaps adjusted
810                  dynamically based on server load or weather quality). Likewise, a representation's
811                  modification time, if defined with only one-second resolution, might be a weak validator
812                  if it is possible for the representation to be modified twice during a single second
813                  and retrieved between those modifications.
[2418]814               </p>
815            </div>
[2734]816            <div id="rfc.section.2.1.p.8">
817               <p>Likewise, a validator is weak if it is shared by two or more representations of a
818                  given resource at the same time, unless those representations have identical representation
819                  data. For example, if the origin server sends the same validator for a representation
820                  with a gzip content coding applied as it does for a representation with no content
821                  coding, then that validator is weak. However, two simultaneous representations might
822                  share the same strong validator if they differ only in the representation metadata,
823                  such as when two different media types are available for the same representation data.
824               </p>
825            </div>
826            <div id="rfc.section.2.1.p.9">
827               <p>Strong validators are usable for all conditional requests, including cache validation,
828                  partial content ranges, and "lost update" avoidance. Weak validators are only usable
829                  when the client does not require exact equality with previously obtained representation
830                  data, such as when validating a cache entry or limiting a web traversal to recent
831                  changes.
832               </p>
833            </div>
[2418]834         </div>
[2734]835         <div id="header.last-modified">
836            <h2 id="rfc.section.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.2">2.2</a>&nbsp;<a href="#header.last-modified">Last-Modified</a></h2>
837            <div id="rfc.section.2.2.p.1">
838               <p>The "Last-Modified" header field in a response provides a timestamp indicating the
839                  date and time at which the origin server believes the selected representation was
840                  last modified, as determined at the conclusion of handling the request.
841               </p>
842            </div>
843            <div id="rfc.figure.u.1"><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.1"></span>  <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> = <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">HTTP-date</a>
844</pre></div>
845            <div id="rfc.section.2.2.p.2">
846               <p>An example of its use is</p>
847            </div>
848            <div id="rfc.figure.u.2"><pre class="text">  Last-Modified: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 12:45:26 GMT
849</pre></div>
850            <div id="lastmod.generation">
851               <h3 id="rfc.section.2.2.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.2.1">2.2.1</a>&nbsp;<a href="#lastmod.generation">Generation</a></h3>
852               <div id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.1">
853                  <p>An origin server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send Last-Modified for any selected representation for which a last modification date
854                     can be reasonably and consistently determined, since its use in conditional requests
855                     and evaluating cache freshness (<a href="#RFC7234" id="rfc.xref.RFC7234.2"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching">[RFC7234]</cite></a>) results in a substantial reduction of HTTP traffic on the Internet and can be a
856                     significant factor in improving service scalability and reliability.
857                  </p>
858               </div>
859               <div id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.2">
860                  <p>A representation is typically the sum of many parts behind the resource interface.
861                     The last-modified time would usually be the most recent time that any of those parts
862                     were changed. How that value is determined for any given resource is an implementation
863                     detail beyond the scope of this specification. What matters to HTTP is how recipients
864                     of the Last-Modified header field can use its value to make conditional requests and
865                     test the validity of locally cached responses.
866                  </p>
867               </div>
868               <div id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.3">
869                  <p>An origin server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> obtain the Last-Modified value of the representation as close as possible to the time
870                     that it generates the <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" class="smpl">Date</a> field value for its response. This allows a recipient to make an accurate assessment
871                     of the representation's modification time, especially if the representation changes
872                     near the time that the response is generated.
873                  </p>
874               </div>
875               <div id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.4">
876                  <p>An origin server with a clock <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> send a Last-Modified date that is later than the server's time of message origination
877                     (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" class="smpl">Date</a>). If the last modification time is derived from implementation-specific metadata
878                     that evaluates to some time in the future, according to the origin server's clock,
879                     then the origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> replace that value with the message origination date. This prevents a future modification
880                     date from having an adverse impact on cache validation.
881                  </p>
882               </div>
883               <div id="rfc.section.2.2.1.p.5">
884                  <p>An origin server without a clock <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> assign Last-Modified values to a response unless these values were associated with
885                     the resource by some other system or user with a reliable clock.
886                  </p>
887               </div>
888            </div>
889            <div id="lastmod.comparison">
890               <h3 id="rfc.section.2.2.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.2.2">2.2.2</a>&nbsp;<a href="#lastmod.comparison">Comparison</a></h3>
891               <div id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.1">
892                  <p>A Last-Modified time, when used as a validator in a request, is implicitly weak unless
893                     it is possible to deduce that it is strong, using the following rules:
894                  </p>
895                  <ul>
896                     <li>The validator is being compared by an origin server to the actual current validator
897                        for the representation and,
898                     </li>
899                     <li>That origin server reliably knows that the associated representation did not change
900                        twice during the second covered by the presented validator.
901                     </li>
902                  </ul>
903               </div>
904               <div id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.2">
905                  <p>or </p>
906                  <ul>
907                     <li>The validator is about to be used by a client in an <a href="#header.if-modified-since" class="smpl">If-Modified-Since</a>, <a href="#header.if-unmodified-since" class="smpl">If-Unmodified-Since</a>, or <a href="p5-range.html#header.if-range" class="smpl">If-Range</a> header field, because the client has a cache entry for the associated representation,
908                        and
909                     </li>
910                     <li>That cache entry includes a <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" class="smpl">Date</a> value, which gives the time when the origin server sent the original response, and
911                     </li>
912                     <li>The presented Last-Modified time is at least 60 seconds before the Date value.</li>
913                  </ul>
914               </div>
915               <div id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.3">
916                  <p>or </p>
917                  <ul>
918                     <li>The validator is being compared by an intermediate cache to the validator stored in
919                        its cache entry for the representation, and
920                     </li>
921                     <li>That cache entry includes a <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" class="smpl">Date</a> value, which gives the time when the origin server sent the original response, and
922                     </li>
923                     <li>The presented Last-Modified time is at least 60 seconds before the Date value.</li>
924                  </ul>
925               </div>
926               <div id="rfc.section.2.2.2.p.4">
927                  <p>This method relies on the fact that if two different responses were sent by the origin
928                     server during the same second, but both had the same Last-Modified time, then at least
929                     one of those responses would have a <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" class="smpl">Date</a> value equal to its Last-Modified time. The arbitrary 60-second limit guards against
930                     the possibility that the Date and Last-Modified values are generated from different
931                     clocks or at somewhat different times during the preparation of the response. An implementation <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> use a value larger than 60 seconds, if it is believed that 60 seconds is too short.
932                  </p>
933               </div>
934            </div>
935         </div>
[2418]936         <div id="header.etag">
937            <h2 id="rfc.section.2.3"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3">2.3</a>&nbsp;<a href="#header.etag">ETag</a></h2>
[2734]938            <div id="rfc.section.2.3.p.1">
939               <p>The "ETag" header field in a response provides the current entity-tag for the selected
940                  representation, as determined at the conclusion of handling the request. An entity-tag
941                  is an opaque validator for differentiating between multiple representations of the
942                  same resource, regardless of whether those multiple representations are due to resource
943                  state changes over time, content negotiation resulting in multiple representations
944                  being valid at the same time, or both. An entity-tag consists of an opaque quoted
945                  string, possibly prefixed by a weakness indicator.
946               </p>
947            </div>
948            <div id="rfc.figure.u.3"><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.2"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.3"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.4"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.5"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.6"></span>  <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">ETag</a>       = <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">entity-tag</a>
[1260]949
950  <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">entity-tag</a> = [ <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">weak</a> ] <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">opaque-tag</a>
951  <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">weak</a>       = %x57.2F ; "W/", case-sensitive
[1805]952  <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">opaque-tag</a> = <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">DQUOTE</a> *<a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">etagc</a> <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">DQUOTE</a>
953  <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">etagc</a>      = %x21 / %x23-7E / <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">obs-text</a>
954             ; <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">VCHAR</a> except double quotes, plus obs-text
[2734]955</pre></div>
956            <div class="note">
957               <div id="rfc.section.2.3.p.2">
958                  <p><b>Note:</b> Previously, opaque-tag was defined to be a quoted-string (<a href="#RFC2616" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2616]</cite></a>, <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-3.11">Section 3.11</a>); thus, some recipients might perform backslash unescaping. Servers therefore ought
959                     to avoid backslash characters in entity tags.
960                  </p>
961               </div>
[2418]962            </div>
[2734]963            <div id="rfc.section.2.3.p.3">
964               <p>An entity-tag can be more reliable for validation than a modification date in situations
965                  where it is inconvenient to store modification dates, where the one-second resolution
966                  of HTTP date values is not sufficient, or where modification dates are not consistently
967                  maintained.
968               </p>
969            </div>
970            <div id="rfc.figure.u.4">
971               <p>Examples:</p><pre class="text">  ETag: "xyzzy"
[1253]972  ETag: W/"xyzzy"
973  ETag: ""
[2734]974</pre></div>
975            <div id="rfc.section.2.3.p.4">
976               <p>An entity-tag can be either a weak or strong validator, with strong being the default.
977                  If an origin server provides an entity-tag for a representation and the generation
978                  of that entity-tag does not satisfy all of the characteristics of a strong validator
979                  (<a href="#weak.and.strong.validators" title="Weak versus Strong">Section&nbsp;2.1</a>), then the origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> mark the entity-tag as weak by prefixing its opaque value with "W/" (case-sensitive).
980               </p>
981            </div>
[2418]982            <div id="entity.tag.generation">
983               <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.1">2.3.1</a>&nbsp;<a href="#entity.tag.generation">Generation</a></h3>
[2734]984               <div id="rfc.section.2.3.1.p.1">
985                  <p>The principle behind entity-tags is that only the service author knows the implementation
986                     of a resource well enough to select the most accurate and efficient validation mechanism
987                     for that resource, and that any such mechanism can be mapped to a simple sequence
988                     of octets for easy comparison. Since the value is opaque, there is no need for the
989                     client to be aware of how each entity-tag is constructed.
990                  </p>
991               </div>
992               <div id="rfc.section.2.3.1.p.2">
993                  <p>For example, a resource that has implementation-specific versioning applied to all
994                     changes might use an internal revision number, perhaps combined with a variance identifier
995                     for content negotiation, to accurately differentiate between representations. Other
996                     implementations might use a collision-resistant hash of representation content, a
997                     combination of various file attributes, or a modification timestamp that has sub-second
998                     resolution.
999                  </p>
1000               </div>
1001               <div id="rfc.section.2.3.1.p.3">
1002                  <p>An origin server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send an ETag for any selected representation for which detection of changes can be
1003                     reasonably and consistently determined, since the entity-tag's use in conditional
1004                     requests and evaluating cache freshness (<a href="#RFC7234" id="rfc.xref.RFC7234.3"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching">[RFC7234]</cite></a>) can result in a substantial reduction of HTTP network traffic and can be a significant
1005                     factor in improving service scalability and reliability.
1006                  </p>
1007               </div>
[2418]1008            </div>
1009            <div id="entity.tag.comparison">
1010               <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.2">2.3.2</a>&nbsp;<a href="#entity.tag.comparison">Comparison</a></h3>
[2734]1011               <div id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.1">
1012                  <p>There are two entity-tag comparison functions, depending on whether or not the comparison
1013                     context allows the use of weak validators:
1014                  </p>
1015                  <ul>
1016                     <li><dfn>Strong comparison</dfn>: two entity-tags are equivalent if both are not weak and their opaque-tags match
1017                        character-by-character.
1018                     </li>
1019                     <li><dfn>Weak comparison</dfn>: two entity-tags are equivalent if their opaque-tags match character-by-character,
1020                        regardless of either or both being tagged as "weak".
1021                     </li>
1022                  </ul>
1023               </div>
1024               <div id="rfc.section.2.3.2.p.2">
1025                  <p>The example below shows the results for a set of entity-tag pairs and both the weak
1026                     and strong comparison function results:
1027                  </p>
1028               </div>
[2418]1029               <div id="rfc.table.u.1">
1030                  <table class="tt full left" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0">
1031                     <thead>
1032                        <tr>
1033                           <th>ETag 1</th>
1034                           <th>ETag 2</th>
1035                           <th>Strong Comparison</th>
1036                           <th>Weak Comparison</th>
1037                        </tr>
1038                     </thead>
1039                     <tbody>
1040                        <tr>
1041                           <td class="left">W/"1"</td>
1042                           <td class="left">W/"1"</td>
1043                           <td class="left">no match</td>
1044                           <td class="left">match</td>
1045                        </tr>
1046                        <tr>
1047                           <td class="left">W/"1"</td>
1048                           <td class="left">W/"2"</td>
1049                           <td class="left">no match</td>
1050                           <td class="left">no match</td>
1051                        </tr>
1052                        <tr>
1053                           <td class="left">W/"1"</td>
1054                           <td class="left">"1"</td>
1055                           <td class="left">no match</td>
1056                           <td class="left">match</td>
1057                        </tr>
1058                        <tr>
1059                           <td class="left">"1"</td>
1060                           <td class="left">"1"</td>
1061                           <td class="left">match</td>
1062                           <td class="left">match</td>
1063                        </tr>
1064                     </tbody>
1065                  </table>
1066               </div>
1067            </div>
1068            <div id="example.entity.tag.vs.conneg">
[2671]1069               <h3 id="rfc.section.2.3.3"><a href="#rfc.section.2.3.3">2.3.3</a>&nbsp;<a href="#example.entity.tag.vs.conneg">Example: Entity-Tags Varying on Content-Negotiated Resources</a></h3>
[2734]1070               <div id="rfc.section.2.3.3.p.1">
1071                  <p>Consider a resource that is subject to content negotiation (<a href="p2-semantics.html#content.negotiation" title="Content Negotiation">Section 3.4</a> of <a href="#RFC7231" id="rfc.xref.RFC7231.3"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[RFC7231]</cite></a>), and where the representations sent in response to a GET request vary based on the <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.accept-encoding" class="smpl">Accept-Encoding</a> request header field (<a href="p2-semantics.html#header.accept-encoding" title="Accept-Encoding">Section 5.3.4</a> of <a href="#RFC7231" id="rfc.xref.RFC7231.4"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[RFC7231]</cite></a>):
1072                  </p>
1073               </div>
1074               <div id="rfc.figure.u.5">
1075                  <p>&gt;&gt; Request:</p><pre class="text2">GET /index HTTP/1.1
[1381]1076Host: www.example.com
1077Accept-Encoding: gzip
1078
[2734]1079</pre></div>
1080               <div id="rfc.section.2.3.3.p.2">
1081                  <p>In this case, the response might or might not use the gzip content coding. If it does
1082                     not, the response might look like:
1083                  </p>
1084               </div>
1085               <div id="rfc.figure.u.6">
1086                  <p>&gt;&gt; Response:</p><pre class="text">HTTP/1.1 200 OK
[2207]1087Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:05:00 GMT
[1381]1088ETag: "123-a"
1089Content-Length: 70
1090Vary: Accept-Encoding
1091Content-Type: text/plain
1092
1093<span id="exbody">Hello World!
1094Hello World!
1095Hello World!
1096Hello World!
1097Hello World!
[2734]1098</span></pre></div>
1099               <div id="rfc.section.2.3.3.p.3">
1100                  <p>An alternative representation that does use gzip content coding would be:</p>
1101               </div>
1102               <div id="rfc.figure.u.7">
1103                  <p>&gt;&gt; Response:</p><pre class="text">HTTP/1.1 200 OK
[2207]1104Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:05:00 GMT
[1381]1105ETag: "123-b"
1106Content-Length: 43
1107Vary: Accept-Encoding
1108Content-Type: text/plain
1109Content-Encoding: gzip
1110
[2734]1111<em>...binary data...</em></pre></div>
1112               <div class="note">
1113                  <div id="rfc.section.2.3.3.p.4">
1114                     <p><b>Note:</b> Content codings are a property of the representation data, so a strong entity-tag
1115                        for a content-encoded representation has to be distinct from the entity tag of an
1116                        unencoded representation to prevent potential conflicts during cache updates and range
1117                        requests. In contrast, transfer codings (<a href="p1-messaging.html#transfer.codings" title="Transfer Codings">Section 4</a> of <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.4"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a>) apply only during message transfer and do not result in distinct entity-tags.
1118                     </p>
1119                  </div>
[2418]1120               </div>
1121            </div>
1122         </div>
1123         <div id="when.to.use.entity.tags.and.last-modified.dates">
[2671]1124            <h2 id="rfc.section.2.4"><a href="#rfc.section.2.4">2.4</a>&nbsp;<a href="#when.to.use.entity.tags.and.last-modified.dates">When to Use Entity-Tags and Last-Modified Dates</a></h2>
[2734]1125            <div id="rfc.section.2.4.p.1">
1126               <p>In <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.200" class="smpl">200 (OK)</a> responses to GET or HEAD, an origin server:
1127               </p>
1128               <ul>
1129                  <li><em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send an entity-tag validator unless it is not feasible to generate one.
1130                  </li>
1131                  <li><em class="bcp14">MAY</em> send a weak entity-tag instead of a strong entity-tag, if performance considerations
1132                     support the use of weak entity-tags, or if it is unfeasible to send a strong entity-tag.
1133                  </li>
1134                  <li><em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send a <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> value if it is feasible to send one.
1135                  </li>
1136               </ul>
1137            </div>
1138            <div id="rfc.section.2.4.p.2">
1139               <p>In other words, the preferred behavior for an origin server is to send both a strong
1140                  entity-tag and a <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> value in successful responses to a retrieval request.
1141               </p>
1142            </div>
1143            <div id="rfc.section.2.4.p.3">
1144               <p>A client: </p>
1145               <ul>
1146                  <li><em class="bcp14">MUST</em> send that entity-tag in any cache validation request (using <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> or <a href="#header.if-none-match" class="smpl">If-None-Match</a>) if an entity-tag has been provided by the origin server.
1147                  </li>
1148                  <li><em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send the <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> value in non-subrange cache validation requests (using <a href="#header.if-modified-since" class="smpl">If-Modified-Since</a>) if only a Last-Modified value has been provided by the origin server.
1149                  </li>
1150                  <li><em class="bcp14">MAY</em> send the <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> value in subrange cache validation requests (using <a href="#header.if-unmodified-since" class="smpl">If-Unmodified-Since</a>) if only a Last-Modified value has been provided by an HTTP/1.0 origin server. The
1151                     user agent <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> provide a way to disable this, in case of difficulty.
1152                  </li>
1153                  <li><em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send both validators in cache validation requests if both an entity-tag and a <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> value have been provided by the origin server. This allows both HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1
1154                     caches to respond appropriately.
1155                  </li>
1156               </ul>
1157            </div>
[2418]1158         </div>
[1381]1159      </div>
[2418]1160      <div id="preconditions">
1161         <h1 id="rfc.section.3"><a href="#rfc.section.3">3.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#preconditions">Precondition Header Fields</a></h1>
[2734]1162         <div id="rfc.section.3.p.1">
1163            <p>This section defines the syntax and semantics of HTTP/1.1 header fields for applying
1164               preconditions on requests. <a href="#evaluation" title="Evaluation">Section&nbsp;5</a> defines when the preconditions are applied. <a href="#precedence" title="Precedence">Section&nbsp;6</a> defines the order of evaluation when more than one precondition is present.
1165            </p>
1166         </div>
[2418]1167         <div id="header.if-match">
1168            <h2 id="rfc.section.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.1">3.1</a>&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-match">If-Match</a></h2>
[2734]1169            <div id="rfc.section.3.1.p.1">
1170               <p>The "If-Match" header field makes the request method conditional on the recipient
1171                  origin server either having at least one current representation of the target resource,
1172                  when the field-value is "*", or having a current representation of the target resource
1173                  that has an entity-tag matching a member of the list of entity-tags provided in the
1174                  field-value.
1175               </p>
1176            </div>
1177            <div id="rfc.section.3.1.p.2">
1178               <p>An origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> use the strong comparison function when comparing entity-tags for If-Match (<a href="#entity.tag.comparison" title="Comparison">Section&nbsp;2.3.2</a>), since the client intends this precondition to prevent the method from being applied
1179                  if there have been any changes to the representation data.
1180               </p>
1181            </div>
1182            <div id="rfc.figure.u.8"><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.7"></span>  <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> = "*" / 1#<a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">entity-tag</a>
1183</pre></div>
1184            <div id="rfc.section.3.1.p.3">
1185               <p>Examples:</p>
1186            </div>
1187            <div id="rfc.figure.u.9"><pre class="text">  If-Match: "xyzzy"
[2355]1188  If-Match: "xyzzy", "r2d2xxxx", "c3piozzzz"
1189  If-Match: *
[2734]1190</pre></div>
1191            <div id="rfc.section.3.1.p.4">
1192               <p>If-Match is most often used with state-changing methods (e.g., POST, PUT, DELETE)
1193                  to prevent accidental overwrites when multiple user agents might be acting in parallel
1194                  on the same resource (i.e., to prevent the "lost update" problem). It can also be
1195                  used with safe methods to abort a request if the <a href="p2-semantics.html#representations" class="smpl">selected representation</a> does not match one already stored (or partially stored) from a prior request.
1196               </p>
1197            </div>
1198            <div id="rfc.section.3.1.p.5">
1199               <p>An origin server that receives an If-Match header field <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> evaluate the condition prior to performing the method (<a href="#evaluation" title="Evaluation">Section&nbsp;5</a>). If the field-value is "*", the condition is false if the origin server does not
1200                  have a current representation for the target resource. If the field-value is a list
1201                  of entity-tags, the condition is false if none of the listed tags match the entity-tag
1202                  of the selected representation.
1203               </p>
1204            </div>
1205            <div id="rfc.section.3.1.p.6">
1206               <p>An origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> perform the requested method if a received If-Match condition evaluates to false;
1207                  instead, the origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> respond with either a) the <a href="#status.412" class="smpl">412 (Precondition Failed)</a> status code or b) one of the <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.2xx" class="smpl">2xx (Successful)</a> status codes if the origin server has verified that a state change is being requested
1208                  and the final state is already reflected in the current state of the target resource
1209                  (i.e., the change requested by the user agent has already succeeded, but the user
1210                  agent might not be aware of it, perhaps because the prior response was lost or a compatible
1211                  change was made by some other user agent). In the latter case, the origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> send a validator header field in the response unless it can verify that the request
1212                  is a duplicate of an immediately prior change made by the same user agent.
1213               </p>
1214            </div>
1215            <div id="rfc.section.3.1.p.7">
1216               <p>The If-Match header field can be ignored by caches and intermediaries because it is
1217                  not applicable to a stored response.
1218               </p>
1219            </div>
[2418]1220         </div>
1221         <div id="header.if-none-match">
1222            <h2 id="rfc.section.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2">3.2</a>&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-none-match">If-None-Match</a></h2>
[2734]1223            <div id="rfc.section.3.2.p.1">
1224               <p>The "If-None-Match" header field makes the request method conditional on a recipient
1225                  cache or origin server either not having any current representation of the target
1226                  resource, when the field-value is "*", or having a selected representation with an
1227                  entity-tag that does not match any of those listed in the field-value.
1228               </p>
1229            </div>
1230            <div id="rfc.section.3.2.p.2">
1231               <p>A recipient <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> use the weak comparison function when comparing entity-tags for If-None-Match (<a href="#entity.tag.comparison" title="Comparison">Section&nbsp;2.3.2</a>), since weak entity-tags can be used for cache validation even if there have been
1232                  changes to the representation data.
1233               </p>
1234            </div>
1235            <div id="rfc.figure.u.10"><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.8"></span>  <a href="#header.if-none-match" class="smpl">If-None-Match</a> = "*" / 1#<a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">entity-tag</a>
1236</pre></div>
1237            <div id="rfc.section.3.2.p.3">
1238               <p>Examples:</p>
1239            </div>
1240            <div id="rfc.figure.u.11"><pre class="text">  If-None-Match: "xyzzy"
[2361]1241  If-None-Match: W/"xyzzy"
1242  If-None-Match: "xyzzy", "r2d2xxxx", "c3piozzzz"
1243  If-None-Match: W/"xyzzy", W/"r2d2xxxx", W/"c3piozzzz"
1244  If-None-Match: *
[2734]1245</pre></div>
1246            <div id="rfc.section.3.2.p.4">
1247               <p>If-None-Match is primarily used in conditional GET requests to enable efficient updates
1248                  of cached information with a minimum amount of transaction overhead. When a client
1249                  desires to update one or more stored responses that have entity-tags, the client <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> generate an If-None-Match header field containing a list of those entity-tags when
1250                  making a GET request; this allows recipient servers to send a <a href="#status.304" class="smpl">304 (Not Modified)</a> response to indicate when one of those stored responses matches the selected representation.
1251               </p>
1252            </div>
1253            <div id="rfc.section.3.2.p.5">
1254               <p>If-None-Match can also be used with a value of "*" to prevent an unsafe request method
1255                  (e.g., PUT) from inadvertently modifying an existing representation of the target
1256                  resource when the client believes that the resource does not have a current representation
1257                  (<a href="p2-semantics.html#safe.methods" title="Safe Methods">Section 4.2.1</a> of <a href="#RFC7231" id="rfc.xref.RFC7231.5"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[RFC7231]</cite></a>). This is a variation on the "lost update" problem that might arise if more than
1258                  one client attempts to create an initial representation for the target resource.
1259               </p>
1260            </div>
1261            <div id="rfc.section.3.2.p.6">
1262               <p>An origin server that receives an If-None-Match header field <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> evaluate the condition prior to performing the method (<a href="#evaluation" title="Evaluation">Section&nbsp;5</a>). If the field-value is "*", the condition is false if the origin server has a current
1263                  representation for the target resource. If the field-value is a list of entity-tags,
1264                  the condition is false if one of the listed tags match the entity-tag of the selected
1265                  representation.
1266               </p>
1267            </div>
1268            <div id="rfc.section.3.2.p.7">
1269               <p>An origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> perform the requested method if the condition evaluates to false; instead, the origin
1270                  server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> respond with either a) the <a href="#status.304" class="smpl">304 (Not Modified)</a> status code if the request method is GET or HEAD or b) the <a href="#status.412" class="smpl">412 (Precondition Failed)</a> status code for all other request methods.
1271               </p>
1272            </div>
1273            <div id="rfc.section.3.2.p.8">
1274               <p>Requirements on cache handling of a received If-None-Match header field are defined
1275                  in <a href="p6-cache.html#validation.received" title="Handling a Received Validation Request">Section 4.3.2</a> of <a href="#RFC7234" id="rfc.xref.RFC7234.4"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching">[RFC7234]</cite></a>.
1276               </p>
1277            </div>
[2418]1278         </div>
1279         <div id="header.if-modified-since">
1280            <h2 id="rfc.section.3.3"><a href="#rfc.section.3.3">3.3</a>&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-modified-since">If-Modified-Since</a></h2>
[2734]1281            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.1">
1282               <p>The "If-Modified-Since" header field makes a GET or HEAD request method conditional
1283                  on the selected representation's modification date being more recent than the date
1284                  provided in the field-value. Transfer of the selected representation's data is avoided
1285                  if that data has not changed.
1286               </p>
1287            </div>
1288            <div id="rfc.figure.u.12"><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.9"></span>  <a href="#header.if-modified-since" class="smpl">If-Modified-Since</a> = <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">HTTP-date</a>
1289</pre></div>
1290            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.2">
1291               <p>An example of the field is:</p>
1292            </div>
1293            <div id="rfc.figure.u.13"><pre class="text">  If-Modified-Since: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 19:43:31 GMT
1294</pre></div>
1295            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.3">
1296               <p>A recipient <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> ignore If-Modified-Since if the request contains an <a href="#header.if-none-match" class="smpl">If-None-Match</a> header field; the condition in <a href="#header.if-none-match" class="smpl">If-None-Match</a> is considered to be a more accurate replacement for the condition in If-Modified-Since,
1297                  and the two are only combined for the sake of interoperating with older intermediaries
1298                  that might not implement <a href="#header.if-none-match" class="smpl">If-None-Match</a>.
1299               </p>
1300            </div>
1301            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.4">
1302               <p>A recipient <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> ignore the If-Modified-Since header field if the received field-value is not a valid
1303                  HTTP-date, or if the request method is neither GET nor HEAD.
1304               </p>
1305            </div>
1306            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.5">
1307               <p>A recipient <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> interpret an If-Modified-Since field-value's timestamp in terms of the origin server's
1308                  clock.
1309               </p>
1310            </div>
1311            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.6">
1312               <p>If-Modified-Since is typically used for two distinct purposes: 1) to allow efficient
1313                  updates of a cached representation that does not have an entity-tag and 2) to limit
1314                  the scope of a web traversal to resources that have recently changed.
1315               </p>
1316            </div>
1317            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.7">
1318               <p>When used for cache updates, a cache will typically use the value of the cached message's <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> field to generate the field value of If-Modified-Since. This behavior is most interoperable
1319                  for cases where clocks are poorly synchronized or when the server has chosen to only
1320                  honor exact timestamp matches (due to a problem with Last-Modified dates that appear
1321                  to go "back in time" when the origin server's clock is corrected or a representation
1322                  is restored from an archived backup). However, caches occasionally generate the field
1323                  value based on other data, such as the <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" class="smpl">Date</a> header field of the cached message or the local clock time that the message was received,
1324                  particularly when the cached message does not contain a <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> field.
1325               </p>
1326            </div>
1327            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.8">
1328               <p>When used for limiting the scope of retrieval to a recent time window, a user agent
1329                  will generate an If-Modified-Since field value based on either its own local clock
1330                  or a <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" class="smpl">Date</a> header field received from the server in a prior response. Origin servers that choose
1331                  an exact timestamp match based on the selected representation's <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> field will not be able to help the user agent limit its data transfers to only those
1332                  changed during the specified window.
1333               </p>
1334            </div>
1335            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.9">
1336               <p>An origin server that receives an If-Modified-Since header field <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> evaluate the condition prior to performing the method (<a href="#evaluation" title="Evaluation">Section&nbsp;5</a>). The origin server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> perform the requested method if the selected representation's last modification date
1337                  is earlier than or equal to the date provided in the field-value; instead, the origin
1338                  server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> generate a <a href="#status.304" class="smpl">304 (Not Modified)</a> response, including only those metadata that are useful for identifying or updating
1339                  a previously cached response.
1340               </p>
1341            </div>
1342            <div id="rfc.section.3.3.p.10">
1343               <p>Requirements on cache handling of a received If-Modified-Since header field are defined
1344                  in <a href="p6-cache.html#validation.received" title="Handling a Received Validation Request">Section 4.3.2</a> of <a href="#RFC7234" id="rfc.xref.RFC7234.5"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching">[RFC7234]</cite></a>.
1345               </p>
1346            </div>
[2418]1347         </div>
1348         <div id="header.if-unmodified-since">
1349            <h2 id="rfc.section.3.4"><a href="#rfc.section.3.4">3.4</a>&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-unmodified-since">If-Unmodified-Since</a></h2>
[2734]1350            <div id="rfc.section.3.4.p.1">
1351               <p>The "If-Unmodified-Since" header field makes the request method conditional on the
1352                  selected representation's last modification date being earlier than or equal to the
1353                  date provided in the field-value. This field accomplishes the same purpose as <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> for cases where the user agent does not have an entity-tag for the representation.
1354               </p>
1355            </div>
1356            <div id="rfc.figure.u.14"><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.10"></span>  <a href="#header.if-unmodified-since" class="smpl">If-Unmodified-Since</a> = <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">HTTP-date</a>
1357</pre></div>
1358            <div id="rfc.section.3.4.p.2">
1359               <p>An example of the field is:</p>
1360            </div>
1361            <div id="rfc.figure.u.15"><pre class="text">  If-Unmodified-Since: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 19:43:31 GMT
1362</pre></div>
1363            <div id="rfc.section.3.4.p.3">
1364               <p>A recipient <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> ignore If-Unmodified-Since if the request contains an <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> header field; the condition in <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> is considered to be a more accurate replacement for the condition in If-Unmodified-Since,
1365                  and the two are only combined for the sake of interoperating with older intermediaries
1366                  that might not implement <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a>.
1367               </p>
1368            </div>
1369            <div id="rfc.section.3.4.p.4">
1370               <p>A recipient <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> ignore the If-Unmodified-Since header field if the received field-value is not a valid
1371                  HTTP-date.
1372               </p>
1373            </div>
1374            <div id="rfc.section.3.4.p.5">
1375               <p>A recipient <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> interpret an If-Unmodified-Since field-value's timestamp in terms of the origin server's
1376                  clock.
1377               </p>
1378            </div>
1379            <div id="rfc.section.3.4.p.6">
1380               <p>If-Unmodified-Since is most often used with state-changing methods (e.g., POST, PUT,
1381                  DELETE) to prevent accidental overwrites when multiple user agents might be acting
1382                  in parallel on a resource that does not supply entity-tags with its representations
1383                  (i.e., to prevent the "lost update" problem). It can also be used with safe methods
1384                  to abort a request if the <a href="p2-semantics.html#representations" class="smpl">selected representation</a> does not match one already stored (or partially stored) from a prior request.
1385               </p>
1386            </div>
1387            <div id="rfc.section.3.4.p.7">
1388               <p>An origin server that receives an If-Unmodified-Since header field <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> evaluate the condition prior to performing the method (<a href="#evaluation" title="Evaluation">Section&nbsp;5</a>). The origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> perform the requested method if the selected representation's last modification date
1389                  is more recent than the date provided in the field-value; instead the origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> respond with either a) the <a href="#status.412" class="smpl">412 (Precondition Failed)</a> status code or b) one of the <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.2xx" class="smpl">2xx (Successful)</a> status codes if the origin server has verified that a state change is being requested
1390                  and the final state is already reflected in the current state of the target resource
1391                  (i.e., the change requested by the user agent has already succeeded, but the user
1392                  agent might not be aware of that because the prior response message was lost or a
1393                  compatible change was made by some other user agent). In the latter case, the origin
1394                  server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> send a validator header field in the response unless it can verify that the request
1395                  is a duplicate of an immediately prior change made by the same user agent.
1396               </p>
1397            </div>
1398            <div id="rfc.section.3.4.p.8">
1399               <p>The If-Unmodified-Since header field can be ignored by caches and intermediaries because
1400                  it is not applicable to a stored response.
1401               </p>
1402            </div>
[2418]1403         </div>
1404         <div id="header.if-range">
1405            <h2 id="rfc.section.3.5"><a href="#rfc.section.3.5">3.5</a>&nbsp;<a href="#header.if-range">If-Range</a></h2>
[2734]1406            <div id="rfc.section.3.5.p.1">
1407               <p>The "If-Range" header field provides a special conditional request mechanism that
1408                  is similar to the <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> and <a href="#header.if-unmodified-since" class="smpl">If-Unmodified-Since</a> header fields but that instructs the recipient to ignore the <a href="p5-range.html#header.range" class="smpl">Range</a> header field if the validator doesn't match, resulting in transfer of the new selected
1409                  representation instead of a <a href="#status.412" class="smpl">412 (Precondition Failed)</a> response. If-Range is defined in <a href="p5-range.html#header.if-range" title="If-Range">Section 3.2</a> of <a href="#RFC7233" id="rfc.xref.RFC7233.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests">[RFC7233]</cite></a>.
1410               </p>
1411            </div>
[2418]1412         </div>
[700]1413      </div>
[2418]1414      <div id="status.code.definitions">
1415         <h1 id="rfc.section.4"><a href="#rfc.section.4">4.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#status.code.definitions">Status Code Definitions</a></h1>
1416         <div id="status.304">
1417            <h2 id="rfc.section.4.1"><a href="#rfc.section.4.1">4.1</a>&nbsp;<a href="#status.304">304 Not Modified</a></h2>
[2734]1418            <div id="rfc.section.4.1.p.1">
1419               <p>The <dfn>304 (Not Modified)</dfn> status code indicates that a conditional GET or HEAD request has been received and
1420                  would have resulted in a <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.200" class="smpl">200 (OK)</a> response if it were not for the fact that the condition evaluated to false. In other
1421                  words, there is no need for the server to transfer a representation of the target
1422                  resource because the request indicates that the client, which made the request conditional,
1423                  already has a valid representation; the server is therefore redirecting the client
1424                  to make use of that stored representation as if it were the payload of a <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.200" class="smpl">200 (OK)</a> response.
1425               </p>
1426            </div>
1427            <div id="rfc.section.4.1.p.2">
1428               <p>The server generating a 304 response <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> generate any of the following header fields that would have been sent in a <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.200" class="smpl">200 (OK)</a> response to the same request: <a href="p6-cache.html#header.cache-control" class="smpl">Cache-Control</a>, <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.content-location" class="smpl">Content-Location</a>, <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.date" class="smpl">Date</a>, <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">ETag</a>, <a href="p6-cache.html#header.expires" class="smpl">Expires</a>, and <a href="p2-semantics.html#header.vary" class="smpl">Vary</a>.
1429               </p>
1430            </div>
1431            <div id="rfc.section.4.1.p.3">
1432               <p>Since the goal of a 304 response is to minimize information transfer when the recipient
1433                  already has one or more cached representations, a sender <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> generate representation metadata other than the above listed fields unless said metadata
1434                  exists for the purpose of guiding cache updates (e.g., <a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> might be useful if the response does not have an <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">ETag</a> field).
1435               </p>
1436            </div>
1437            <div id="rfc.section.4.1.p.4">
1438               <p>Requirements on a cache that receives a 304 response are defined in <a href="p6-cache.html#freshening.responses" title="Freshening Stored Responses upon Validation">Section 4.3.4</a> of <a href="#RFC7234" id="rfc.xref.RFC7234.6"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching">[RFC7234]</cite></a>. If the conditional request originated with an outbound client, such as a user agent
1439                  with its own cache sending a conditional GET to a shared proxy, then the proxy <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> forward the 304 response to that client.
1440               </p>
1441            </div>
1442            <div id="rfc.section.4.1.p.5">
1443               <p>A 304 response cannot contain a message-body; it is always terminated by the first
1444                  empty line after the header fields.
1445               </p>
1446            </div>
[2418]1447         </div>
1448         <div id="status.412">
1449            <h2 id="rfc.section.4.2"><a href="#rfc.section.4.2">4.2</a>&nbsp;<a href="#status.412">412 Precondition Failed</a></h2>
[2734]1450            <div id="rfc.section.4.2.p.1">
1451               <p>The <dfn>412 (Precondition Failed)</dfn> status code indicates that one or more conditions given in the request header fields
1452                  evaluated to false when tested on the server. This response code allows the client
1453                  to place preconditions on the current resource state (its current representations
1454                  and metadata) and, thus, prevent the request method from being applied if the target
1455                  resource is in an unexpected state.
1456               </p>
1457            </div>
[2418]1458         </div>
[253]1459      </div>
[2418]1460      <div id="evaluation">
1461         <h1 id="rfc.section.5"><a href="#rfc.section.5">5.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#evaluation">Evaluation</a></h1>
[2734]1462         <div id="rfc.section.5.p.1">
1463            <p>Except when excluded below, a recipient cache or origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> evaluate received request preconditions after it has successfully performed its normal
1464               request checks and just before it would perform the action associated with the request
1465               method. A server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> ignore all received preconditions if its response to the same request without those
1466               conditions would have been a status code other than a <a href="p2-semantics.html#status.2xx" class="smpl">2xx (Successful)</a> or <a href="#status.412" class="smpl">412 (Precondition Failed)</a>. In other words, redirects and failures take precedence over the evaluation of preconditions
1467               in conditional requests.
1468            </p>
1469         </div>
1470         <div id="rfc.section.5.p.2">
1471            <p>A server that is not the origin server for the target resource and cannot act as a
1472               cache for requests on the target resource <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> evaluate the conditional request header fields defined by this specification, and
1473               it <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> forward them if the request is forwarded, since the generating client intends that
1474               they be evaluated by a server that can provide a current representation. Likewise,
1475               a server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> ignore the conditional request header fields defined by this specification when received
1476               with a request method that does not involve the selection or modification of a <a href="p2-semantics.html#representations" class="smpl">selected representation</a>, such as CONNECT, OPTIONS, or TRACE.
1477            </p>
1478         </div>
1479         <div id="rfc.section.5.p.3">
1480            <p>Conditional request header fields that are defined by extensions to HTTP might place
1481               conditions on all recipients, on the state of the target resource in general, or on
1482               a group of resources. For instance, the "If" header field in WebDAV can make a request
1483               conditional on various aspects of multiple resources, such as locks, if the recipient
1484               understands and implements that field (<a href="#RFC4918" id="rfc.xref.RFC4918.2"><cite title="HTTP Extensions for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)">[RFC4918]</cite></a>, <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4918#section-10.4">Section 10.4</a>).
1485            </p>
1486         </div>
1487         <div id="rfc.section.5.p.4">
1488            <p>Although conditional request header fields are defined as being usable with the HEAD
1489               method (to keep HEAD's semantics consistent with those of GET), there is no point
1490               in sending a conditional HEAD because a successful response is around the same size
1491               as a <a href="#status.304" class="smpl">304 (Not Modified)</a> response and more useful than a <a href="#status.412" class="smpl">412 (Precondition Failed)</a> response.
1492            </p>
1493         </div>
[2418]1494      </div>
1495      <div id="precedence">
1496         <h1 id="rfc.section.6"><a href="#rfc.section.6">6.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#precedence">Precedence</a></h1>
[2734]1497         <div id="rfc.section.6.p.1">
1498            <p>When more than one conditional request header field is present in a request, the order
1499               in which the fields are evaluated becomes important. In practice, the fields defined
1500               in this document are consistently implemented in a single, logical order, since "lost
1501               update" preconditions have more strict requirements than cache validation, a validated
1502               cache is more efficient than a partial response, and entity tags are presumed to be
1503               more accurate than date validators.
1504            </p>
1505         </div>
1506         <div id="rfc.section.6.p.2">
1507            <p>A recipient cache or origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> evaluate the request preconditions defined by this specification in the following
1508               order:
1509            </p>
1510            <ol>
1511               <li id="precedence1">When recipient is the origin server and <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> is present, evaluate the <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> precondition:
1512                  <ul>
1513                     <li>if true, continue to step <a href="#precedence3">3</a></li>
1514                     <li>if false, respond <a href="#status.412" class="smpl">412 (Precondition Failed)</a> unless it can be determined that the state-changing request has already succeeded
1515                        (see <a href="#header.if-match" id="rfc.xref.header.if-match.1" title="If-Match">Section&nbsp;3.1</a>)
1516                     </li>
1517                  </ul>
1518               </li>
1519               <li id="precedence2">When recipient is the origin server, <a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> is not present, and <a href="#header.if-unmodified-since" class="smpl">If-Unmodified-Since</a> is present, evaluate the <a href="#header.if-unmodified-since" class="smpl">If-Unmodified-Since</a> precondition:
1520                  <ul>
1521                     <li>if true, continue to step <a href="#precedence3">3</a></li>
1522                     <li>if false, respond <a href="#status.412" class="smpl">412 (Precondition Failed)</a> unless it can be determined that the state-changing request has already succeeded
1523                        (see <a href="#header.if-unmodified-since" id="rfc.xref.header.if-unmodified-since.1" title="If-Unmodified-Since">Section&nbsp;3.4</a>)
1524                     </li>
1525                  </ul>
1526               </li>
1527               <li id="precedence3">When <a href="#header.if-none-match" class="smpl">If-None-Match</a> is present, evaluate the <a href="#header.if-none-match" class="smpl">If-None-Match</a> precondition:
1528                  <ul>
1529                     <li>if true, continue to step <a href="#precedence5">5</a></li>
1530                     <li>if false for GET/HEAD, respond <a href="#status.304" class="smpl">304 (Not Modified)</a></li>
1531                     <li>if false for other methods, respond <a href="#status.412" class="smpl">412 (Precondition Failed)</a></li>
1532                  </ul>
1533               </li>
1534               <li id="precedence4">When the method is GET or HEAD, <a href="#header.if-none-match" class="smpl">If-None-Match</a> is not present, and <a href="#header.if-modified-since" class="smpl">If-Modified-Since</a> is present, evaluate the <a href="#header.if-modified-since" class="smpl">If-Modified-Since</a> precondition:
1535                  <ul>
1536                     <li>if true, continue to step <a href="#precedence5">5</a></li>
1537                     <li>if false, respond <a href="#status.304" class="smpl">304 (Not Modified)</a></li>
1538                  </ul>
1539               </li>
1540               <li id="precedence5">When the method is GET and both <a href="p5-range.html#header.range" class="smpl">Range</a> and <a href="p5-range.html#header.if-range" class="smpl">If-Range</a> are present, evaluate the <a href="p5-range.html#header.if-range" class="smpl">If-Range</a> precondition:
1541                  <ul>
1542                     <li>if the validator matches and the Range specification is applicable to the selected
1543                        representation, respond <a href="p5-range.html#status.206" class="smpl">206 (Partial Content)</a> <a href="#RFC7233" id="rfc.xref.RFC7233.2"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests">[RFC7233]</cite></a></li>
1544                  </ul>
1545               </li>
1546               <li id="precedencelast">Otherwise,
1547                  <ul>
1548                     <li>all conditions are met, so perform the requested action and respond according to its
1549                        success or failure.
1550                     </li>
1551                  </ul>
1552               </li>
1553            </ol>
1554         </div>
1555         <div id="rfc.section.6.p.3">
1556            <p>Any extension to HTTP/1.1 that defines additional conditional request header fields
1557               ought to define its own expectations regarding the order for evaluating such fields
1558               in relation to those defined in this document and other conditionals that might be
1559               found in practice.
1560            </p>
1561         </div>
[2418]1562      </div>
1563      <div id="IANA.considerations">
1564         <h1 id="rfc.section.7"><a href="#rfc.section.7">7.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#IANA.considerations">IANA Considerations</a></h1>
1565         <div id="status.code.registration">
1566            <h2 id="rfc.section.7.1"><a href="#rfc.section.7.1">7.1</a>&nbsp;<a href="#status.code.registration">Status Code Registration</a></h2>
[2734]1567            <div id="rfc.section.7.1.p.1">
1568               <p>The "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code Registry" located at &lt;<a href="http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes">http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes</a>&gt; has been updated with the registrations below:
1569               </p>
1570            </div>
[2418]1571            <div id="rfc.table.1">
1572               <div id="iana.status.code.registration.table"></div>
1573               <table class="tt full left" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0">
1574                  <thead>
1575                     <tr>
1576                        <th>Value</th>
1577                        <th>Description</th>
1578                        <th>Reference</th>
1579                     </tr>
1580                  </thead>
1581                  <tbody>
1582                     <tr>
1583                        <td class="left">304</td>
1584                        <td class="left">Not Modified</td>
1585                        <td class="left"><a href="#status.304" id="rfc.xref.status.304.1" title="304 Not Modified">Section&nbsp;4.1</a>
1586                        </td>
1587                     </tr>
1588                     <tr>
1589                        <td class="left">412</td>
1590                        <td class="left">Precondition Failed</td>
1591                        <td class="left"><a href="#status.412" id="rfc.xref.status.412.1" title="412 Precondition Failed">Section&nbsp;4.2</a>
1592                        </td>
1593                     </tr>
1594                  </tbody>
1595               </table>
1596            </div>
1597         </div>
1598         <div id="header.field.registration">
1599            <h2 id="rfc.section.7.2"><a href="#rfc.section.7.2">7.2</a>&nbsp;<a href="#header.field.registration">Header Field Registration</a></h2>
[2734]1600            <div id="rfc.section.7.2.p.1">
1601               <p>HTTP header fields are registered within the "Message Headers" registry maintained
1602                  at &lt;<a href="http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/">http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/</a>&gt;.
1603               </p>
1604            </div>
1605            <div id="rfc.section.7.2.p.2">
1606               <p>This document defines the following HTTP header fields, so their associated registry
1607                  entries have been updated according to the permanent registrations below (see <a href="#BCP90" id="rfc.xref.BCP90.1"><cite title="Registration Procedures for Message Header Fields">[BCP90]</cite></a>):
1608               </p>
1609            </div>
[2418]1610            <div id="rfc.table.2">
1611               <div id="iana.header.registration.table"></div>
1612               <table class="tt full left" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0">
1613                  <thead>
1614                     <tr>
1615                        <th>Header Field Name</th>
1616                        <th>Protocol</th>
1617                        <th>Status</th>
1618                        <th>Reference</th>
1619                     </tr>
1620                  </thead>
1621                  <tbody>
1622                     <tr>
1623                        <td class="left">ETag</td>
1624                        <td class="left">http</td>
1625                        <td class="left">standard</td>
1626                        <td class="left"><a href="#header.etag" id="rfc.xref.header.etag.2" title="ETag">Section&nbsp;2.3</a>
1627                        </td>
1628                     </tr>
1629                     <tr>
1630                        <td class="left">If-Match</td>
1631                        <td class="left">http</td>
1632                        <td class="left">standard</td>
1633                        <td class="left"><a href="#header.if-match" id="rfc.xref.header.if-match.2" title="If-Match">Section&nbsp;3.1</a>
1634                        </td>
1635                     </tr>
1636                     <tr>
1637                        <td class="left">If-Modified-Since</td>
1638                        <td class="left">http</td>
1639                        <td class="left">standard</td>
1640                        <td class="left"><a href="#header.if-modified-since" id="rfc.xref.header.if-modified-since.1" title="If-Modified-Since">Section&nbsp;3.3</a>
1641                        </td>
1642                     </tr>
1643                     <tr>
1644                        <td class="left">If-None-Match</td>
1645                        <td class="left">http</td>
1646                        <td class="left">standard</td>
1647                        <td class="left"><a href="#header.if-none-match" id="rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.1" title="If-None-Match">Section&nbsp;3.2</a>
1648                        </td>
1649                     </tr>
1650                     <tr>
1651                        <td class="left">If-Unmodified-Since</td>
1652                        <td class="left">http</td>
1653                        <td class="left">standard</td>
1654                        <td class="left"><a href="#header.if-unmodified-since" id="rfc.xref.header.if-unmodified-since.2" title="If-Unmodified-Since">Section&nbsp;3.4</a>
1655                        </td>
1656                     </tr>
1657                     <tr>
1658                        <td class="left">Last-Modified</td>
1659                        <td class="left">http</td>
1660                        <td class="left">standard</td>
1661                        <td class="left"><a href="#header.last-modified" id="rfc.xref.header.last-modified.2" title="Last-Modified">Section&nbsp;2.2</a>
1662                        </td>
1663                     </tr>
1664                  </tbody>
1665               </table>
1666            </div>
[2734]1667            <div id="rfc.section.7.2.p.3">
1668               <p>The change controller is: "IETF (iesg@ietf.org) - Internet Engineering Task Force".</p>
1669            </div>
[2418]1670         </div>
1671      </div>
1672      <div id="security.considerations">
1673         <h1 id="rfc.section.8"><a href="#rfc.section.8">8.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#security.considerations">Security Considerations</a></h1>
[2734]1674         <div id="rfc.section.8.p.1">
1675            <p>This section is meant to inform developers, information providers, and users of known
1676               security concerns specific to the HTTP conditional request mechanisms. More general
1677               security considerations are addressed in HTTP "Message Syntax and Routing" <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.5"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a> and "Semantics and Content" <a href="#RFC7231" id="rfc.xref.RFC7231.6"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[RFC7231]</cite></a>.
1678            </p>
1679         </div>
1680         <div id="rfc.section.8.p.2">
1681            <p>The validators defined by this specification are not intended to ensure the validity
1682               of a representation, guard against malicious changes, or detect man-in-the-middle
1683               attacks. At best, they enable more efficient cache updates and optimistic concurrent
1684               writes when all participants are behaving nicely. At worst, the conditions will fail
1685               and the client will receive a response that is no more harmful than an HTTP exchange
1686               without conditional requests.
1687            </p>
1688         </div>
1689         <div id="rfc.section.8.p.3">
1690            <p>An entity-tag can be abused in ways that create privacy risks. For example, a site
1691               might deliberately construct a semantically invalid entity-tag that is unique to the
1692               user or user agent, send it in a cacheable response with a long freshness time, and
1693               then read that entity-tag in later conditional requests as a means of re-identifying
1694               that user or user agent. Such an identifying tag would become a persistent identifier
1695               for as long as the user agent retained the original cache entry. User agents that
1696               cache representations ought to ensure that the cache is cleared or replaced whenever
1697               the user performs privacy-maintaining actions, such as clearing stored cookies or
1698               changing to a private browsing mode.
1699            </p>
1700         </div>
[2418]1701      </div>
1702      <div id="acks">
1703         <h1 id="rfc.section.9"><a href="#rfc.section.9">9.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#acks">Acknowledgments</a></h1>
[2734]1704         <div id="rfc.section.9.p.1">
1705            <p>See <a href="p1-messaging.html#acks" title="Acknowledgments">Section 10</a> of <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.6"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a>.
1706            </p>
1707         </div>
[2418]1708      </div>
[2361]1709      <h1 id="rfc.references"><a id="rfc.section.10" href="#rfc.section.10">10.</a> References
[52]1710      </h1>
[2361]1711      <h2 id="rfc.references.1"><a href="#rfc.section.10.1" id="rfc.section.10.1">10.1</a> Normative References
[119]1712      </h2>
[2232]1713      <table>
[52]1714         <tr>
[2629]1715            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2119">[RFC2119]</b></td>
[2734]1716            <td class="top">Bradner, S., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>”, BCP&nbsp;14, RFC&nbsp;2119, March&nbsp;1997.
[52]1717            </td>
1718         </tr>
1719         <tr>
[2629]1720            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC5234">[RFC5234]</b></td>
[2734]1721            <td class="top">Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5234">Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF</a>”, STD&nbsp;68, RFC&nbsp;5234, January&nbsp;2008.
[1436]1722            </td>
1723         </tr>
1724         <tr>
[2629]1725            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC7230">[RFC7230]</b></td>
[2734]1726            <td class="top">Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest">Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest (work in progress), June&nbsp;2014.
[52]1727            </td>
1728         </tr>
1729         <tr>
[2629]1730            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC7231">[RFC7231]</b></td>
[2734]1731            <td class="top">Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest">Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest (work in progress), June&nbsp;2014.
[52]1732            </td>
1733         </tr>
1734         <tr>
[2629]1735            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC7233">[RFC7233]</b></td>
[2734]1736            <td class="top">Fielding, R., Ed., Lafon, Y., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest">Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest (work in progress), June&nbsp;2014.
[52]1737            </td>
1738         </tr>
[425]1739         <tr>
[2629]1740            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC7234">[RFC7234]</b></td>
[2734]1741            <td class="top">Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest">Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching</a>”, Internet-Draft&nbsp;draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest (work in progress), June&nbsp;2014.
[425]1742            </td>
1743         </tr>
[119]1744      </table>
[2361]1745      <h2 id="rfc.references.2"><a href="#rfc.section.10.2" id="rfc.section.10.2">10.2</a> Informative References
[119]1746      </h2>
[2232]1747      <table>
[52]1748         <tr>
[2046]1749            <td class="reference"><b id="BCP90">[BCP90]</b></td>
[2734]1750            <td class="top">Klyne, G., Nottingham, M., and J. Mogul, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3864">Registration Procedures for Message Header Fields</a>”, BCP&nbsp;90, RFC&nbsp;3864, September&nbsp;2004.
[52]1751            </td>
1752         </tr>
[253]1753         <tr>
[2046]1754            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2616">[RFC2616]</b></td>
[2734]1755            <td class="top">Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a>”, RFC&nbsp;2616, June&nbsp;1999.
[253]1756            </td>
1757         </tr>
[1251]1758         <tr>
1759            <td class="reference"><b id="RFC4918">[RFC4918]</b></td>
[2734]1760            <td class="top">Dusseault, L., Ed., “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4918">HTTP Extensions for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)</a>”, RFC&nbsp;4918, June&nbsp;2007.
[1251]1761            </td>
1762         </tr>
[52]1763      </table>
[2418]1764      <div id="changes.from.rfc.2616">
1765         <h1 id="rfc.section.A" class="np"><a href="#rfc.section.A">A.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#changes.from.rfc.2616">Changes from RFC 2616</a></h1>
[2734]1766         <div id="rfc.section.A.p.1">
1767            <p>The definition of validator weakness has been expanded and clarified. (<a href="#weak.and.strong.validators" title="Weak versus Strong">Section&nbsp;2.1</a>)
1768            </p>
1769         </div>
1770         <div id="rfc.section.A.p.2">
1771            <p>Weak entity-tags are now allowed in all requests except range requests. (Sections <a href="#weak.and.strong.validators" title="Weak versus Strong">2.1</a> and <a href="#header.if-none-match" id="rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.2" title="If-None-Match">3.2</a>)
1772            </p>
1773         </div>
1774         <div id="rfc.section.A.p.3">
1775            <p>The <a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">ETag</a> header field ABNF has been changed to not use quoted-string, thus avoiding escaping
1776               issues. (<a href="#header.etag" id="rfc.xref.header.etag.3" title="ETag">Section&nbsp;2.3</a>)
1777            </p>
1778         </div>
1779         <div id="rfc.section.A.p.4">
1780            <p>ETag is defined to provide an entity tag for the selected representation, thereby
1781               clarifying what it applies to in various situations (such as a PUT response). (<a href="#header.etag" id="rfc.xref.header.etag.4" title="ETag">Section&nbsp;2.3</a>)
1782            </p>
1783         </div>
1784         <div id="rfc.section.A.p.5">
1785            <p>The precedence for evaluation of conditional requests has been defined. (<a href="#precedence" title="Precedence">Section&nbsp;6</a>)
1786            </p>
1787         </div>
[2418]1788      </div>
1789      <div id="imported.abnf">
1790         <h1 id="rfc.section.B"><a href="#rfc.section.B">B.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#imported.abnf">Imported ABNF</a></h1>
[2734]1791         <div id="rfc.section.B.p.1">
1792            <p>The following core rules are included by reference, as defined in <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5234#appendix-B.1">Appendix B.1</a> of <a href="#RFC5234" id="rfc.xref.RFC5234.2"><cite title="Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF">[RFC5234]</cite></a>: ALPHA (letters), CR (carriage return), CRLF (CR LF), CTL (controls), DIGIT (decimal
1793               0-9), DQUOTE (double quote), HEXDIG (hexadecimal 0-9/A-F/a-f), LF (line feed), OCTET
1794               (any 8-bit sequence of data), SP (space), and VCHAR (any visible US-ASCII character).
1795            </p>
1796         </div>
1797         <div id="rfc.section.B.p.2">
1798            <p>The rules below are defined in <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.7"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a>:
1799            </p>
1800         </div>
1801         <div id="rfc.figure.u.16"><pre class="inline">  <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">OWS</a>           = &lt;OWS, see <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.8"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a>, <a href="p1-messaging.html#whitespace" title="Whitespace">Section 3.2.3</a>&gt;
[2667]1802  <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">obs-text</a>      = &lt;obs-text, see <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.9"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a>, <a href="p1-messaging.html#field.components" title="Field Value Components">Section 3.2.6</a>&gt;
[2418]1803</pre></div>
[2734]1804         <div id="rfc.section.B.p.3">
1805            <p>The rules below are defined in other parts:</p>
1806         </div>
1807         <div id="rfc.figure.u.17"><pre class="inline">  <a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">HTTP-date</a>     = &lt;HTTP-date, see <a href="#RFC7231" id="rfc.xref.RFC7231.7"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content">[RFC7231]</cite></a>, <a href="p2-semantics.html#http.date" title="Date/Time Formats">Section 7.1.1.1</a>&gt;
1808</pre></div>
1809      </div>
[2418]1810      <div id="collected.abnf">
1811         <h1 id="rfc.section.C"><a href="#rfc.section.C">C.</a>&nbsp;<a href="#collected.abnf">Collected ABNF</a></h1>
[2734]1812         <div id="rfc.section.C.p.1">
1813            <p>In the collected ABNF below, list rules are expanded as per <a href="p1-messaging.html#notation" title="Syntax Notation">Section 1.2</a> of <a href="#RFC7230" id="rfc.xref.RFC7230.10"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing">[RFC7230]</cite></a>.
1814            </p>
1815         </div>
1816         <div id="rfc.figure.u.18"><pre class="inline"><a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">ETag</a> = entity-tag
[427]1817
[2667]1818<a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">HTTP-date</a> = &lt;HTTP-date, see [RFC7231], Section 7.1.1.1&gt;
[427]1819
[1233]1820<a href="#header.if-match" class="smpl">If-Match</a> = "*" / ( *( "," OWS ) entity-tag *( OWS "," [ OWS
[421]1821 entity-tag ] ) )
[1233]1822<a href="#header.if-modified-since" class="smpl">If-Modified-Since</a> = HTTP-date
1823<a href="#header.if-none-match" class="smpl">If-None-Match</a> = "*" / ( *( "," OWS ) entity-tag *( OWS "," [ OWS
[421]1824 entity-tag ] ) )
[1233]1825<a href="#header.if-unmodified-since" class="smpl">If-Unmodified-Since</a> = HTTP-date
[427]1826
[1233]1827<a href="#header.last-modified" class="smpl">Last-Modified</a> = HTTP-date
[427]1828
[2667]1829<a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">OWS</a> = &lt;OWS, see [RFC7230], Section 3.2.3&gt;
[427]1830
[1260]1831<a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">entity-tag</a> = [ weak ] opaque-tag
[1470]1832<a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">etagc</a> = "!" / %x23-7E ; '#'-'~'
1833 / obs-text
[427]1834
[2667]1835<a href="#imported.abnf" class="smpl">obs-text</a> = &lt;obs-text, see [RFC7230], Section 3.2.6&gt;
[1470]1836<a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">opaque-tag</a> = DQUOTE *etagc DQUOTE
[427]1837
[1260]1838<a href="#header.etag" class="smpl">weak</a> = %x57.2F ; W/
[2418]1839</pre></div>
[2734]1840      </div>
[52]1841      <h1 id="rfc.index"><a href="#rfc.index">Index</a></h1>
[2629]1842      <p class="noprint"><a href="#rfc.index.3">3</a> <a href="#rfc.index.4">4</a> <a href="#rfc.index.B">B</a> <a href="#rfc.index.E">E</a> <a href="#rfc.index.G">G</a> <a href="#rfc.index.I">I</a> <a href="#rfc.index.L">L</a> <a href="#rfc.index.M">M</a> <a href="#rfc.index.R">R</a> <a href="#rfc.index.S">S</a> <a href="#rfc.index.V">V</a>
[52]1843      </p>
1844      <div class="print2col">
1845         <ul class="ind">
[1072]1846            <li><a id="rfc.index.3" href="#rfc.index.3"><b>3</b></a><ul>
[2734]1847                  <li>304 Not Modified (status code)&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.4.1"><b>4.1</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.status.304.1">7.1</a></li>
[52]1848               </ul>
1849            </li>
[1072]1850            <li><a id="rfc.index.4" href="#rfc.index.4"><b>4</b></a><ul>
[2734]1851                  <li>412 Precondition Failed (status code)&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.4.2"><b>4.2</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.status.412.1">7.1</a></li>
[52]1852               </ul>
1853            </li>
[2046]1854            <li><a id="rfc.index.B" href="#rfc.index.B"><b>B</b></a><ul>
[2361]1855                  <li><em>BCP90</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.BCP90.1">7.2</a>, <a href="#BCP90"><b>10.2</b></a></li>
[2046]1856               </ul>
1857            </li>
[1072]1858            <li><a id="rfc.index.E" href="#rfc.index.E"><b>E</b></a><ul>
[2734]1859                  <li>ETag header field&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.header.etag.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.section.2.3"><b>2.3</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.etag.2">7.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.etag.3">A</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.etag.4">A</a></li>
[52]1860               </ul>
1861            </li>
[1072]1862            <li><a id="rfc.index.G" href="#rfc.index.G"><b>G</b></a><ul>
1863                  <li><tt>Grammar</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;
1864                     <ul>
[1381]1865                        <li><tt>entity-tag</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.3"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
1866                        <li><tt>ETag</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.2"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
[1470]1867                        <li><tt>etagc</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.6"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
1868                        <li><tt>If-Match</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.7"><b>3.1</b></a></li>
1869                        <li><tt>If-Modified-Since</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.9"><b>3.3</b></a></li>
1870                        <li><tt>If-None-Match</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.8"><b>3.2</b></a></li>
1871                        <li><tt>If-Unmodified-Since</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.10"><b>3.4</b></a></li>
[1381]1872                        <li><tt>Last-Modified</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.1"><b>2.2</b></a></li>
1873                        <li><tt>opaque-tag</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.5"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
1874                        <li><tt>weak</tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.g.4"><b>2.3</b></a></li>
[52]1875                     </ul>
1876                  </li>
1877               </ul>
1878            </li>
[1072]1879            <li><a id="rfc.index.I" href="#rfc.index.I"><b>I</b></a><ul>
[2734]1880                  <li>If-Match header field&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.3.1"><b>3.1</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-match.1">6</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-match.2">7.2</a></li>
1881                  <li>If-Modified-Since header field&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.3.3"><b>3.3</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-modified-since.1">7.2</a></li>
1882                  <li>If-None-Match header field&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.3.2"><b>3.2</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.1">7.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.2">A</a></li>
1883                  <li>If-Unmodified-Since header field&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.3.4"><b>3.4</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-unmodified-since.1">6</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-unmodified-since.2">7.2</a></li>
[52]1884               </ul>
1885            </li>
[1072]1886            <li><a id="rfc.index.L" href="#rfc.index.L"><b>L</b></a><ul>
[2734]1887                  <li>Last-Modified header field&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.header.last-modified.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.section.2.2"><b>2.2</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.last-modified.2">7.2</a></li>
[52]1888               </ul>
1889            </li>
[1253]1890            <li><a id="rfc.index.M" href="#rfc.index.M"><b>M</b></a><ul>
[2734]1891                  <li>metadata&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.2"><b>2</b></a></li>
[1253]1892               </ul>
1893            </li>
[1072]1894            <li><a id="rfc.index.R" href="#rfc.index.R"><b>R</b></a><ul>
[2361]1895                  <li><em>RFC2119</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2119.1">1.1</a>, <a href="#RFC2119"><b>10.1</b></a></li>
1896                  <li><em>RFC2616</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">2.3</a>, <a href="#RFC2616"><b>10.2</b></a><ul>
[1470]1897                        <li><em>Section 3.11</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">2.3</a></li>
1898                     </ul>
1899                  </li>
[2361]1900                  <li><em>RFC4918</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC4918.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC4918.2">5</a>, <a href="#RFC4918"><b>10.2</b></a><ul>
[2164]1901                        <li><em>Section 10.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC4918.2">5</a></li>
1902                     </ul>
1903                  </li>
[2361]1904                  <li><em>RFC5234</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC5234.1">1.2</a>, <a href="#RFC5234"><b>10.1</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC5234.2">B</a><ul>
[1805]1905                        <li><em>Appendix B.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC5234.2">B</a></li>
[425]1906                     </ul>
1907                  </li>
[2629]1908                  <li><em>RFC7230</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.1">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.2">1.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.3">1.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.4">2.3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.5">8</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.6">9</a>, <a href="#RFC7230"><b>10.1</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.7">B</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.8">B</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.9">B</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.10">C</a><ul>
1909                        <li><em>Section 1.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.10">C</a></li>
1910                        <li><em>Section 2.5</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.2">1.1</a></li>
1911                        <li><em>Section 3.2.3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.8">B</a></li>
1912                        <li><em>Section 3.2.6</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.9">B</a></li>
1913                        <li><em>Section 4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.4">2.3.3</a></li>
1914                        <li><em>Section 7</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.3">1.2</a></li>
1915                        <li><em>Section 10</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7230.6">9</a></li>
1916                     </ul>
1917                  </li>
1918                  <li><em>RFC7231</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.1">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.2">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.3">2.3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.4">2.3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.5">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.6">8</a>, <a href="#RFC7231"><b>10.1</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.7">B</a><ul>
1919                        <li><em>Section 3</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.2">1</a></li>
1920                        <li><em>Section 3.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.3">2.3.3</a></li>
1921                        <li><em>Section 4.2.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.5">3.2</a></li>
1922                        <li><em>Section 5.3.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.4">2.3.3</a></li>
1923                        <li><em>Section 7.1.1.1</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7231.7">B</a></li>
1924                     </ul>
1925                  </li>
1926                  <li><em>RFC7233</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7233.1">3.5</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7233.2">6</a>, <a href="#RFC7233"><b>10.1</b></a><ul>
1927                        <li><em>Section 3.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7233.1">3.5</a></li>
1928                     </ul>
1929                  </li>
1930                  <li><em>RFC7234</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7234.1">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7234.2">2.2.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7234.3">2.3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7234.4">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7234.5">3.3</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7234.6">4.1</a>, <a href="#RFC7234"><b>10.1</b></a><ul>
1931                        <li><em>Section 4.3.2</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7234.4">3.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7234.5">3.3</a></li>
1932                        <li><em>Section 4.3.4</em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.xref.RFC7234.6">4.1</a></li>
1933                     </ul>
1934                  </li>
[52]1935               </ul>
1936            </li>
[1072]1937            <li><a id="rfc.index.S" href="#rfc.index.S"><b>S</b></a><ul>
[1224]1938                  <li>selected representation&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.iref.s.1"><b>1</b></a></li>
[52]1939               </ul>
1940            </li>
[1253]1941            <li><a id="rfc.index.V" href="#rfc.index.V"><b>V</b></a><ul>
[2734]1942                  <li>validator&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.2"><b>2</b></a><ul>
1943                        <li>strong&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.2.1"><b>2.1</b></a></li>
1944                        <li>weak&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.section.2.1"><b>2.1</b></a></li>
[1381]1945                     </ul>
1946                  </li>
[1253]1947               </ul>
1948            </li>
[52]1949         </ul>
1950      </div>
[2734]1951      <div class="avoidbreakinside">
[2628]1952         <h1 id="rfc.authors"><a href="#rfc.authors">Authors' Addresses</a></h1>
1953         <p><b>Roy T. Fielding</b>
1954            (editor)
[2734]1955            <br>Adobe Systems Incorporated<br>345 Park Ave<br>San Jose, CA&nbsp;95110<br>USA<br>Email: fielding@gbiv.com<br>URI: <a href="http://roy.gbiv.com/">http://roy.gbiv.com/</a></p>
[2628]1956         <p><b>Julian F. Reschke</b>
1957            (editor)
[2734]1958            <br>greenbytes GmbH<br>Hafenweg 16<br>Muenster, NW&nbsp;48155<br>Germany<br>Email: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de<br>URI: <a href="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/">http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/</a></p>
[2628]1959      </div>
[52]1960   </body>
1961</html>
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.