source: draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.xml @ 2070

Last change on this file since 2070 was 2070, checked in by fielding@…, 9 years ago

(editorial) move p1 security considerations regarding semantics to p2

  • Property svn:eol-style set to native
  • Property svn:mime-type set to text/xml
File size: 222.2 KB
1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
2<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='../myxml2rfc.xslt'?>
3<!DOCTYPE rfc [
4  <!ENTITY MAY "<bcp14 xmlns=''>MAY</bcp14>">
5  <!ENTITY MUST "<bcp14 xmlns=''>MUST</bcp14>">
6  <!ENTITY MUST-NOT "<bcp14 xmlns=''>MUST NOT</bcp14>">
7  <!ENTITY OPTIONAL "<bcp14 xmlns=''>OPTIONAL</bcp14>">
8  <!ENTITY RECOMMENDED "<bcp14 xmlns=''>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>">
9  <!ENTITY REQUIRED "<bcp14 xmlns=''>REQUIRED</bcp14>">
10  <!ENTITY SHALL "<bcp14 xmlns=''>SHALL</bcp14>">
11  <!ENTITY SHALL-NOT "<bcp14 xmlns=''>SHALL NOT</bcp14>">
12  <!ENTITY SHOULD "<bcp14 xmlns=''>SHOULD</bcp14>">
13  <!ENTITY SHOULD-NOT "<bcp14 xmlns=''>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>">
14  <!ENTITY ID-VERSION "latest">
15  <!ENTITY ID-MONTH "December">
16  <!ENTITY ID-YEAR "2012">
17  <!ENTITY mdash "&#8212;">
18  <!ENTITY Note "<x:h xmlns:x=''>Note:</x:h>">
19  <!ENTITY caching-overview       "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#caching.overview' xmlns:x=''/>">
20  <!ENTITY cache-incomplete       "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#response.cacheability' xmlns:x=''/>">
21  <!ENTITY payload                "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#payload' xmlns:x=''/>">
22  <!ENTITY media-type            "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#media.type' xmlns:x=''/>">
23  <!ENTITY content-codings        "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#content.codings' xmlns:x=''/>">
24  <!ENTITY CONNECT                "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#CONNECT' xmlns:x=''/>">
25  <!ENTITY content.negotiation    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#content.negotiation' xmlns:x=''/>">
26  <!ENTITY diff-mime              "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#differences.between.http.and.mime' xmlns:x=''/>">
27  <!ENTITY representation         "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#representations' xmlns:x=''/>">
28  <!ENTITY HEAD                   "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#HEAD' xmlns:x=''/>">
29  <!ENTITY header-allow           "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.allow' xmlns:x=''/>">
30  <!ENTITY header-cache-control   "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.cache-control' xmlns:x=''/>">
31  <!ENTITY header-content-encoding    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.content-encoding' xmlns:x=''/>">
32  <!ENTITY header-content-location    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.content-location' xmlns:x=''/>">
33  <!ENTITY header-content-range   "<xref target='Part5' x:rel='#header.content-range' xmlns:x=''/>">
34  <!ENTITY header-content-type    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.content-type' xmlns:x=''/>">
35  <!ENTITY header-date            "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='' xmlns:x=''/>">
36  <!ENTITY header-etag            "<xref target='Part4' x:rel='#header.etag' xmlns:x=''/>">
37  <!ENTITY header-expires         "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.expires' xmlns:x=''/>">
38  <!ENTITY header-last-modified   "<xref target='Part4' x:rel='#header.last-modified' xmlns:x=''/>">
39  <!ENTITY header-mime-version    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#mime-version' xmlns:x=''/>">
40  <!ENTITY header-pragma          "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.pragma' xmlns:x=''/>">
41  <!ENTITY header-proxy-authenticate  "<xref target='Part7' x:rel='#header.proxy-authenticate' xmlns:x=''/>">
42  <!ENTITY header-proxy-authorization "<xref target='Part7' x:rel='#header.proxy-authorization' xmlns:x=''/>">
43  <!ENTITY header-server          "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.server' xmlns:x=''/>">
44  <!ENTITY header-warning         "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.warning' xmlns:x=''/>">
45  <!ENTITY idempotent-methods     "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#idempotent.methods' xmlns:x=''/>">
46  <!ENTITY methods                "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#methods' xmlns:x=''/>">
47  <!ENTITY OPTIONS                "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#OPTIONS' xmlns:x=''/>">
48  <!ENTITY qvalue                 "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#quality.values' xmlns:x=''/>">
49  <!ENTITY resource               "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#resources' xmlns:x=''/>">
50  <!ENTITY selected-representation    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#selected.representation' xmlns:x=''/>">
51  <!ENTITY status-codes           "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='' xmlns:x=''/>">
52  <!ENTITY status-1xx             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.1xx' xmlns:x=''/>">
53  <!ENTITY status-203             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.203' xmlns:x=''/>">
54  <!ENTITY status-3xx             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.3xx' xmlns:x=''/>">
55  <!ENTITY status-304             "<xref target='Part4' x:rel='#status.304' xmlns:x=''/>">
56  <!ENTITY status-4xx             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.4xx' xmlns:x=''/>">
57  <!ENTITY status-414             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.414' xmlns:x=''/>">
58  <!ENTITY iana-header-registry   "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.field.registry' xmlns:x=''/>">
60<?rfc toc="yes" ?>
61<?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
62<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
63<?rfc compact="yes"?>
64<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
65<?rfc linkmailto="no" ?>
66<?rfc editing="no" ?>
67<?rfc comments="yes"?>
68<?rfc inline="yes"?>
69<?rfc rfcedstyle="yes"?>
70<?rfc-ext allow-markup-in-artwork="yes" ?>
71<?rfc-ext include-references-in-index="yes" ?>
72<rfc obsoletes="2145,2616" updates="2817,2818" category="std" x:maturity-level="proposed"
73     ipr="pre5378Trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-&ID-VERSION;"
74     xmlns:x=''>
75<x:link rel="next" basename="p2-semantics"/>
76<x:feedback template="{docname},%20%22{section}%22&amp;body=&lt;{ref}&gt;:"/>
79  <title abbrev="HTTP/1.1 Message Syntax and Routing">Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing</title>
81  <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
82    <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
83    <address>
84      <postal>
85        <street>345 Park Ave</street>
86        <city>San Jose</city>
87        <region>CA</region>
88        <code>95110</code>
89        <country>USA</country>
90      </postal>
91      <email></email>
92      <uri></uri>
93    </address>
94  </author>
96  <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
97    <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
98    <address>
99      <postal>
100        <street>Hafenweg 16</street>
101        <city>Muenster</city><region>NW</region><code>48155</code>
102        <country>Germany</country>
103      </postal>
104      <email></email>
105      <uri></uri>
106    </address>
107  </author>
109  <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
110  <workgroup>HTTPbis Working Group</workgroup>
114   The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for
115   distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. HTTP has been in
116   use by the World Wide Web global information initiative since 1990.
117   This document provides an overview of HTTP architecture and its associated
118   terminology, defines the "http" and "https" Uniform Resource Identifier
119   (URI) schemes, defines the HTTP/1.1 message syntax and parsing requirements,
120   and describes general security concerns for implementations.
124<note title="Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)">
125  <t>
126    Discussion of this draft takes place on the HTTPBIS working group
127    mailing list (, which is archived at
128    <eref target=""/>.
129  </t>
130  <t>
131    The current issues list is at
132    <eref target=""/> and related
133    documents (including fancy diffs) can be found at
134    <eref target=""/>.
135  </t>
136  <t>
137    The changes in this draft are summarized in <xref target="changes.since.21"/>.
138  </t>
142<section title="Introduction" anchor="introduction">
144   The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level
145   request/response protocol that uses extensible semantics and MIME-like
146   message payloads for flexible interaction with network-based hypertext
147   information systems. This document is the first in a series of documents
148   that collectively form the HTTP/1.1 specification:
149   <list style="empty">
150    <t>RFC xxx1: Message Syntax and Routing</t>
151    <t><xref target="Part2" x:fmt="none">RFC xxx2</xref>: Semantics and Content</t>
152    <t><xref target="Part4" x:fmt="none">RFC xxx3</xref>: Conditional Requests</t>
153    <t><xref target="Part5" x:fmt="none">RFC xxx4</xref>: Range Requests</t>
154    <t><xref target="Part6" x:fmt="none">RFC xxx5</xref>: Caching</t>
155    <t><xref target="Part7" x:fmt="none">RFC xxx6</xref>: Authentication</t>
156   </list>
159   This HTTP/1.1 specification obsoletes and moves to historic status
160   <xref target="RFC2616" x:fmt="none">RFC 2616</xref>, its predecessor
161   <xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="none">RFC 2068</xref>, and
162   <xref target="RFC2145" x:fmt="none">RFC 2145</xref> (on HTTP versioning).
163   This specification also updates the use of CONNECT to establish a tunnel,
164   previously defined in <xref target="RFC2817" x:fmt="none">RFC 2817</xref>,
165   and defines the "https" URI scheme that was described informally in
166   <xref target="RFC2818" x:fmt="none">RFC 2818</xref>.
169   HTTP is a generic interface protocol for information systems. It is
170   designed to hide the details of how a service is implemented by presenting
171   a uniform interface to clients that is independent of the types of
172   resources provided. Likewise, servers do not need to be aware of each
173   client's purpose: an HTTP request can be considered in isolation rather
174   than being associated with a specific type of client or a predetermined
175   sequence of application steps. The result is a protocol that can be used
176   effectively in many different contexts and for which implementations can
177   evolve independently over time.
180   HTTP is also designed for use as an intermediation protocol for translating
181   communication to and from non-HTTP information systems.
182   HTTP proxies and gateways can provide access to alternative information
183   services by translating their diverse protocols into a hypertext
184   format that can be viewed and manipulated by clients in the same way
185   as HTTP services.
188   One consequence of this flexibility is that the protocol cannot be
189   defined in terms of what occurs behind the interface. Instead, we
190   are limited to defining the syntax of communication, the intent
191   of received communication, and the expected behavior of recipients.
192   If the communication is considered in isolation, then successful
193   actions ought to be reflected in corresponding changes to the
194   observable interface provided by servers. However, since multiple
195   clients might act in parallel and perhaps at cross-purposes, we
196   cannot require that such changes be observable beyond the scope
197   of a single response.
200   This document describes the architectural elements that are used or
201   referred to in HTTP, defines the "http" and "https" URI schemes,
202   describes overall network operation and connection management,
203   and defines HTTP message framing and forwarding requirements.
204   Our goal is to define all of the mechanisms necessary for HTTP message
205   handling that are independent of message semantics, thereby defining the
206   complete set of requirements for message parsers and
207   message-forwarding intermediaries.
211<section title="Requirement Notation" anchor="intro.requirements">
213   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
214   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
215   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
218   Conformance criteria and considerations regarding error handling
219   are defined in <xref target="conformance"/>.
223<section title="Syntax Notation" anchor="notation">
224<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="ALPHA"/>
225<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="CR"/>
226<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="CRLF"/>
227<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="CTL"/>
228<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="DIGIT"/>
229<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="DQUOTE"/>
230<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HEXDIG"/>
231<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HTAB"/>
232<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="LF"/>
233<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="OCTET"/>
234<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="SP"/>
235<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="VCHAR"/>
237   This specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation
238   of <xref target="RFC5234"/> with the list rule extension defined in
239   <xref target="abnf.extension"/>.  <xref target="collected.abnf"/> shows
240   the collected ABNF with the list rule expanded.
242<t anchor="core.rules">
243  <x:anchor-alias value="ALPHA"/>
244  <x:anchor-alias value="CTL"/>
245  <x:anchor-alias value="CR"/>
246  <x:anchor-alias value="CRLF"/>
247  <x:anchor-alias value="DIGIT"/>
248  <x:anchor-alias value="DQUOTE"/>
249  <x:anchor-alias value="HEXDIG"/>
250  <x:anchor-alias value="HTAB"/>
251  <x:anchor-alias value="LF"/>
252  <x:anchor-alias value="OCTET"/>
253  <x:anchor-alias value="SP"/>
254  <x:anchor-alias value="VCHAR"/>
255   The following core rules are included by
256   reference, as defined in <xref target="RFC5234" x:fmt="," x:sec="B.1"/>:
257   ALPHA (letters), CR (carriage return), CRLF (CR LF), CTL (controls),
258   DIGIT (decimal 0-9), DQUOTE (double quote),
259   HEXDIG (hexadecimal 0-9/A-F/a-f), HTAB (horizontal tab), LF (line feed),
260   OCTET (any 8-bit sequence of data), SP (space), and
261   VCHAR (any visible <xref target="USASCII"/> character).
264   As a convention, ABNF rule names prefixed with "obs-" denote
265   "obsolete" grammar rules that appear for historical reasons.
270<section title="Architecture" anchor="architecture">
272   HTTP was created for the World Wide Web architecture
273   and has evolved over time to support the scalability needs of a worldwide
274   hypertext system. Much of that architecture is reflected in the terminology
275   and syntax productions used to define HTTP.
278<section title="Client/Server Messaging" anchor="operation">
279<iref primary="true" item="client"/>
280<iref primary="true" item="server"/>
281<iref primary="true" item="connection"/>
283   HTTP is a stateless request/response protocol that operates by exchanging
284   <x:dfn>messages</x:dfn> (<xref target="http.message"/>) across a reliable
285   transport or session-layer
286   "<x:dfn>connection</x:dfn>" (<xref target=""/>).
287   An HTTP "<x:dfn>client</x:dfn>" is a program that establishes a connection
288   to a server for the purpose of sending one or more HTTP requests.
289   An HTTP "<x:dfn>server</x:dfn>" is a program that accepts connections
290   in order to service HTTP requests by sending HTTP responses.
292<iref primary="true" item="user agent"/>
293<iref primary="true" item="origin server"/>
294<iref primary="true" item="browser"/>
295<iref primary="true" item="spider"/>
296<iref primary="true" item="sender"/>
297<iref primary="true" item="recipient"/>
299   The terms client and server refer only to the roles that
300   these programs perform for a particular connection.  The same program
301   might act as a client on some connections and a server on others.
302   We use the term "<x:dfn>user agent</x:dfn>" to refer to any of the various
303   client programs that initiate a request, including (but not limited to)
304   browsers, spiders (web-based robots), command-line tools, native
305   applications, and mobile apps.  The term "<x:dfn>origin server</x:dfn>" is
306   used to refer to the program that can originate authoritative responses to
307   a request. For general requirements, we use the terms
308   "<x:dfn>sender</x:dfn>" and "<x:dfn>recipient</x:dfn>" to refer to any
309   component that sends or receives, respectively, a given message.
312   HTTP relies upon the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)
313   standard <xref target="RFC3986"/> to indicate the target resource
314   (<xref target="target-resource"/>) and relationships between resources.
315   Messages are passed in a format similar to that used by Internet mail
316   <xref target="RFC5322"/> and the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions
317   (MIME) <xref target="RFC2045"/> (see &diff-mime; for the differences
318   between HTTP and MIME messages).
321   Most HTTP communication consists of a retrieval request (GET) for
322   a representation of some resource identified by a URI.  In the
323   simplest case, this might be accomplished via a single bidirectional
324   connection (===) between the user agent (UA) and the origin server (O).
326<figure><artwork type="drawing">
327         request   &gt;
328    <x:highlight>UA</x:highlight> ======================================= <x:highlight>O</x:highlight>
329                                &lt;   response
331<iref primary="true" item="message"/>
332<iref primary="true" item="request"/>
333<iref primary="true" item="response"/>
335   A client sends an HTTP request to a server in the form of a <x:dfn>request</x:dfn>
336   message, beginning with a request-line that includes a method, URI, and
337   protocol version (<xref target="request.line"/>),
338   followed by header fields containing
339   request modifiers, client information, and representation metadata
340   (<xref target="header.fields"/>),
341   an empty line to indicate the end of the header section, and finally
342   a message body containing the payload body (if any,
343   <xref target="message.body"/>).
346   A server responds to a client's request by sending one or more HTTP
347   <x:dfn>response</x:dfn>
348   messages, each beginning with a status line that
349   includes the protocol version, a success or error code, and textual
350   reason phrase (<xref target="status.line"/>),
351   possibly followed by header fields containing server
352   information, resource metadata, and representation metadata
353   (<xref target="header.fields"/>),
354   an empty line to indicate the end of the header section, and finally
355   a message body containing the payload body (if any,
356   <xref target="message.body"/>).
359   A connection might be used for multiple request/response exchanges,
360   as defined in <xref target="persistent.connections"/>.
363   The following example illustrates a typical message exchange for a
364   GET request on the URI "":
367client request:
368</preamble><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
369GET /hello.txt HTTP/1.1
370User-Agent: curl/7.16.3 libcurl/7.16.3 OpenSSL/0.9.7l zlib/1.2.3
372Accept-Language: en, mi
376server response:
377</preamble><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;response&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
378HTTP/1.1 200 OK
379Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:28:53 GMT
380Server: Apache
381Last-Modified: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:15:56 GMT
382ETag: "34aa387-d-1568eb00"
383Accept-Ranges: bytes
384Content-Length: <x:length-of target="exbody"/>
385Vary: Accept-Encoding
386Content-Type: text/plain
388<x:span anchor="exbody">Hello World!
392<section title="Implementation Diversity" anchor="implementation-diversity">
394   When considering the design of HTTP, it is easy to fall into a trap of
395   thinking that all user agents are general-purpose browsers and all origin
396   servers are large public websites. That is not the case in practice.
397   Common HTTP user agents include household appliances, stereos, scales,
398   firmware update scripts, command-line programs, mobile apps,
399   and communication devices in a multitude of shapes and sizes.  Likewise,
400   common HTTP origin servers include home automation units, configurable
401   networking components, office machines, autonomous robots, news feeds,
402   traffic cameras, ad selectors, and video delivery platforms.
405   The term "user agent" does not imply that there is a human user directly
406   interacting with the software agent at the time of a request. In many
407   cases, a user agent is installed or configured to run in the background
408   and save its results for later inspection (or save only a subset of those
409   results that might be interesting or erroneous). Spiders, for example, are
410   typically given a start URI and configured to follow certain behavior while
411   crawling the Web as a hypertext graph.
414   The implementation diversity of HTTP means that we cannot assume the
415   user agent can make interactive suggestions to a user or provide adequate
416   warning for security or privacy options.  In the few cases where this
417   specification requires reporting of errors to the user, it is acceptable
418   for such reporting to only be observable in an error console or log file.
419   Likewise, requirements that an automated action be confirmed by the user
420   before proceeding can be met via advance configuration choices,
421   run-time options, or simply not proceeding with the unsafe action.
425<section title="Intermediaries" anchor="intermediaries">
426<iref primary="true" item="intermediary"/>
428   HTTP enables the use of intermediaries to satisfy requests through
429   a chain of connections.  There are three common forms of HTTP
430   <x:dfn>intermediary</x:dfn>: proxy, gateway, and tunnel.  In some cases,
431   a single intermediary might act as an origin server, proxy, gateway,
432   or tunnel, switching behavior based on the nature of each request.
434<figure><artwork type="drawing">
435         &gt;             &gt;             &gt;             &gt;
436    <x:highlight>UA</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>A</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>B</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>C</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>O</x:highlight>
437               &lt;             &lt;             &lt;             &lt;
440   The figure above shows three intermediaries (A, B, and C) between the
441   user agent and origin server. A request or response message that
442   travels the whole chain will pass through four separate connections.
443   Some HTTP communication options
444   might apply only to the connection with the nearest, non-tunnel
445   neighbor, only to the end-points of the chain, or to all connections
446   along the chain. Although the diagram is linear, each participant might
447   be engaged in multiple, simultaneous communications. For example, B
448   might be receiving requests from many clients other than A, and/or
449   forwarding requests to servers other than C, at the same time that it
450   is handling A's request.
453<iref primary="true" item="upstream"/><iref primary="true" item="downstream"/>
454<iref primary="true" item="inbound"/><iref primary="true" item="outbound"/>
455   We use the terms "<x:dfn>upstream</x:dfn>" and "<x:dfn>downstream</x:dfn>"
456   to describe various requirements in relation to the directional flow of a
457   message: all messages flow from upstream to downstream.
458   Likewise, we use the terms inbound and outbound to refer to
459   directions in relation to the request path:
460   "<x:dfn>inbound</x:dfn>" means toward the origin server and
461   "<x:dfn>outbound</x:dfn>" means toward the user agent.
463<t><iref primary="true" item="proxy"/>
464   A "<x:dfn>proxy</x:dfn>" is a message forwarding agent that is selected by the
465   client, usually via local configuration rules, to receive requests
466   for some type(s) of absolute URI and attempt to satisfy those
467   requests via translation through the HTTP interface.  Some translations
468   are minimal, such as for proxy requests for "http" URIs, whereas
469   other requests might require translation to and from entirely different
470   application-level protocols. Proxies are often used to group an
471   organization's HTTP requests through a common intermediary for the
472   sake of security, annotation services, or shared caching.
475<iref primary="true" item="transforming proxy"/>
476<iref primary="true" item="non-transforming proxy"/>
477   An HTTP-to-HTTP proxy is called a "<x:dfn>transforming proxy</x:dfn>" if it is designed
478   or configured to modify request or response messages in a semantically
479   meaningful way (i.e., modifications, beyond those required by normal
480   HTTP processing, that change the message in a way that would be
481   significant to the original sender or potentially significant to
482   downstream recipients).  For example, a transforming proxy might be
483   acting as a shared annotation server (modifying responses to include
484   references to a local annotation database), a malware filter, a
485   format transcoder, or an intranet-to-Internet privacy filter.  Such
486   transformations are presumed to be desired by the client (or client
487   organization) that selected the proxy and are beyond the scope of
488   this specification.  However, when a proxy is not intended to transform
489   a given message, we use the term "<x:dfn>non-transforming proxy</x:dfn>" to target
490   requirements that preserve HTTP message semantics. See &status-203; and
491   &header-warning; for status and warning codes related to transformations.
493<t><iref primary="true" item="gateway"/><iref primary="true" item="reverse proxy"/>
494<iref primary="true" item="accelerator"/>
495   A "<x:dfn>gateway</x:dfn>" (a.k.a., "<x:dfn>reverse proxy</x:dfn>")
496   is a receiving agent that acts
497   as a layer above some other server(s) and translates the received
498   requests to the underlying server's protocol.  Gateways are often
499   used to encapsulate legacy or untrusted information services, to
500   improve server performance through "<x:dfn>accelerator</x:dfn>" caching, and to
501   enable partitioning or load-balancing of HTTP services across
502   multiple machines.
505   A gateway behaves as an origin server on its outbound connection and
506   as a user agent on its inbound connection.
507   All HTTP requirements applicable to an origin server
508   also apply to the outbound communication of a gateway.
509   A gateway communicates with inbound servers using any protocol that
510   it desires, including private extensions to HTTP that are outside
511   the scope of this specification.  However, an HTTP-to-HTTP gateway
512   that wishes to interoperate with third-party HTTP servers &MUST;
513   conform to HTTP user agent requirements on the gateway's inbound
514   connection and &MUST; implement the <x:ref>Connection</x:ref>
515   (<xref target="header.connection"/>) and <x:ref>Via</x:ref>
516   (<xref target="header.via"/>) header fields for both connections.
518<t><iref primary="true" item="tunnel"/>
519   A "<x:dfn>tunnel</x:dfn>" acts as a blind relay between two connections
520   without changing the messages. Once active, a tunnel is not
521   considered a party to the HTTP communication, though the tunnel might
522   have been initiated by an HTTP request. A tunnel ceases to exist when
523   both ends of the relayed connection are closed. Tunnels are used to
524   extend a virtual connection through an intermediary, such as when
525   Transport Layer Security (TLS, <xref target="RFC5246"/>) is used to
526   establish confidential communication through a shared firewall proxy.
528<t><iref primary="true" item="interception proxy"/>
529<iref primary="true" item="transparent proxy"/>
530<iref primary="true" item="captive portal"/>
531   The above categories for intermediary only consider those acting as
532   participants in the HTTP communication.  There are also intermediaries
533   that can act on lower layers of the network protocol stack, filtering or
534   redirecting HTTP traffic without the knowledge or permission of message
535   senders. Network intermediaries often introduce security flaws or
536   interoperability problems by violating HTTP semantics.  For example, an
537   "<x:dfn>interception proxy</x:dfn>" <xref target="RFC3040"/> (also commonly
538   known as a "<x:dfn>transparent proxy</x:dfn>" <xref target="RFC1919"/> or
539   "<x:dfn>captive portal</x:dfn>")
540   differs from an HTTP proxy because it is not selected by the client.
541   Instead, an interception proxy filters or redirects outgoing TCP port 80
542   packets (and occasionally other common port traffic).
543   Interception proxies are commonly found on public network access points,
544   as a means of enforcing account subscription prior to allowing use of
545   non-local Internet services, and within corporate firewalls to enforce
546   network usage policies.
547   They are indistinguishable from a man-in-the-middle attack.
550   HTTP is defined as a stateless protocol, meaning that each request message
551   can be understood in isolation.  Many implementations depend on HTTP's
552   stateless design in order to reuse proxied connections or dynamically
553   load-balance requests across multiple servers.  Hence, servers &MUST-NOT;
554   assume that two requests on the same connection are from the same user
555   agent unless the connection is secured and specific to that agent.
556   Some non-standard HTTP extensions (e.g., <xref target="RFC4559"/>) have
557   been known to violate this requirement, resulting in security and
558   interoperability problems.
562<section title="Caches" anchor="caches">
563<iref primary="true" item="cache"/>
565   A "<x:dfn>cache</x:dfn>" is a local store of previous response messages and the
566   subsystem that controls its message storage, retrieval, and deletion.
567   A cache stores cacheable responses in order to reduce the response
568   time and network bandwidth consumption on future, equivalent
569   requests. Any client or server &MAY; employ a cache, though a cache
570   cannot be used by a server while it is acting as a tunnel.
573   The effect of a cache is that the request/response chain is shortened
574   if one of the participants along the chain has a cached response
575   applicable to that request. The following illustrates the resulting
576   chain if B has a cached copy of an earlier response from O (via C)
577   for a request which has not been cached by UA or A.
579<figure><artwork type="drawing">
580            &gt;             &gt;
581       <x:highlight>UA</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>A</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>B</x:highlight> - - - - - - <x:highlight>C</x:highlight> - - - - - - <x:highlight>O</x:highlight>
582                  &lt;             &lt;
584<t><iref primary="true" item="cacheable"/>
585   A response is "<x:dfn>cacheable</x:dfn>" if a cache is allowed to store a copy of
586   the response message for use in answering subsequent requests.
587   Even when a response is cacheable, there might be additional
588   constraints placed by the client or by the origin server on when
589   that cached response can be used for a particular request. HTTP
590   requirements for cache behavior and cacheable responses are
591   defined in &caching-overview;. 
594   There are a wide variety of architectures and configurations
595   of caches deployed across the World Wide Web and
596   inside large organizations. These include national hierarchies
597   of proxy caches to save transoceanic bandwidth, collaborative systems that
598   broadcast or multicast cache entries, archives of pre-fetched cache
599   entries for use in off-line or high-latency environments, and so on.
603<section title="Conformance and Error Handling" anchor="conformance">
605   This specification targets conformance criteria according to the role of
606   a participant in HTTP communication.  Hence, HTTP requirements are placed
607   on senders, recipients, clients, servers, user agents, intermediaries,
608   origin servers, proxies, gateways, or caches, depending on what behavior
609   is being constrained by the requirement. Additional (social) requirements
610   are placed on implementations, resource owners, and protocol element
611   registrations when they apply beyond the scope of a single communication.
614   The verb "generate" is used instead of "send" where a requirement
615   differentiates between creating a protocol element and merely forwarding a
616   received element downstream.
619   An implementation is considered conformant if it complies with all of the
620   requirements associated with the roles it partakes in HTTP. Note that
621   SHOULD-level requirements are relevant here, unless one of the documented
622   exceptions is applicable.
625   Conformance applies to both the syntax and semantics of HTTP protocol
626   elements. A sender &MUST-NOT; generate protocol elements that convey a
627   meaning that is known by that sender to be false. A sender &MUST-NOT;
628   generate protocol elements that do not match the grammar defined by the
629   ABNF rules for those protocol elements that are applicable to the sender's
630   role. If a received protocol element is processed, the recipient &MUST; be
631   able to parse any value that would match the ABNF rules for that protocol
632   element, excluding only those rules not applicable to the recipient's role.
635   Unless noted otherwise, a recipient &MAY; attempt to recover a usable
636   protocol element from an invalid construct.  HTTP does not define
637   specific error handling mechanisms except when they have a direct impact
638   on security, since different applications of the protocol require
639   different error handling strategies.  For example, a Web browser might
640   wish to transparently recover from a response where the
641   <x:ref>Location</x:ref> header field doesn't parse according to the ABNF,
642   whereas a systems control client might consider any form of error recovery
643   to be dangerous.
647<section title="Protocol Versioning" anchor="http.version">
648  <x:anchor-alias value="HTTP-version"/>
649  <x:anchor-alias value="HTTP-name"/>
651   HTTP uses a "&lt;major&gt;.&lt;minor&gt;" numbering scheme to indicate
652   versions of the protocol. This specification defines version "1.1".
653   The protocol version as a whole indicates the sender's conformance
654   with the set of requirements laid out in that version's corresponding
655   specification of HTTP.
658   The version of an HTTP message is indicated by an HTTP-version field
659   in the first line of the message. HTTP-version is case-sensitive.
661<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HTTP-version"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HTTP-name"/>
662  <x:ref>HTTP-version</x:ref>  = <x:ref>HTTP-name</x:ref> "/" <x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref> "." <x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref>
663  <x:ref>HTTP-name</x:ref>     = <x:abnf-char-sequence>"HTTP"</x:abnf-char-sequence> ; "HTTP", case-sensitive
666   The HTTP version number consists of two decimal digits separated by a "."
667   (period or decimal point).  The first digit ("major version") indicates the
668   HTTP messaging syntax, whereas the second digit ("minor version") indicates
669   the highest minor version to which the sender is
670   conformant and able to understand for future communication.  The minor
671   version advertises the sender's communication capabilities even when the
672   sender is only using a backwards-compatible subset of the protocol,
673   thereby letting the recipient know that more advanced features can
674   be used in response (by servers) or in future requests (by clients).
677   When an HTTP/1.1 message is sent to an HTTP/1.0 recipient
678   <xref target="RFC1945"/> or a recipient whose version is unknown,
679   the HTTP/1.1 message is constructed such that it can be interpreted
680   as a valid HTTP/1.0 message if all of the newer features are ignored.
681   This specification places recipient-version requirements on some
682   new features so that a conformant sender will only use compatible
683   features until it has determined, through configuration or the
684   receipt of a message, that the recipient supports HTTP/1.1.
687   The interpretation of a header field does not change between minor
688   versions of the same major HTTP version, though the default
689   behavior of a recipient in the absence of such a field can change.
690   Unless specified otherwise, header fields defined in HTTP/1.1 are
691   defined for all versions of HTTP/1.x.  In particular, the <x:ref>Host</x:ref>
692   and <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header fields ought to be implemented by all
693   HTTP/1.x implementations whether or not they advertise conformance with
694   HTTP/1.1.
697   New header fields can be defined such that, when they are
698   understood by a recipient, they might override or enhance the
699   interpretation of previously defined header fields.  When an
700   implementation receives an unrecognized header field, the recipient
701   &MUST; ignore that header field for local processing regardless of
702   the message's HTTP version.  An unrecognized header field received
703   by a proxy &MUST; be forwarded downstream unless the header field's
704   field-name is listed in the message's <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field
705   (see <xref target="header.connection"/>).
706   These requirements allow HTTP's functionality to be enhanced without
707   requiring prior update of deployed intermediaries.
710   Intermediaries that process HTTP messages (i.e., all intermediaries
711   other than those acting as tunnels) &MUST; send their own HTTP-version
712   in forwarded messages.  In other words, they &MUST-NOT; blindly
713   forward the first line of an HTTP message without ensuring that the
714   protocol version in that message matches a version to which that
715   intermediary is conformant for both the receiving and
716   sending of messages.  Forwarding an HTTP message without rewriting
717   the HTTP-version might result in communication errors when downstream
718   recipients use the message sender's version to determine what features
719   are safe to use for later communication with that sender.
722   An HTTP client &SHOULD; send a request version equal to the highest
723   version to which the client is conformant and
724   whose major version is no higher than the highest version supported
725   by the server, if this is known.  An HTTP client &MUST-NOT; send a
726   version to which it is not conformant.
729   An HTTP client &MAY; send a lower request version if it is known that
730   the server incorrectly implements the HTTP specification, but only
731   after the client has attempted at least one normal request and determined
732   from the response status or header fields (e.g., <x:ref>Server</x:ref>) that
733   the server improperly handles higher request versions.
736   An HTTP server &SHOULD; send a response version equal to the highest
737   version to which the server is conformant and
738   whose major version is less than or equal to the one received in the
739   request.  An HTTP server &MUST-NOT; send a version to which it is not
740   conformant.  A server &MAY; send a <x:ref>505 (HTTP Version Not
741   Supported)</x:ref> response if it cannot send a response using the
742   major version used in the client's request.
745   An HTTP server &MAY; send an HTTP/1.0 response to an HTTP/1.0 request
746   if it is known or suspected that the client incorrectly implements the
747   HTTP specification and is incapable of correctly processing later
748   version responses, such as when a client fails to parse the version
749   number correctly or when an intermediary is known to blindly forward
750   the HTTP-version even when it doesn't conform to the given minor
751   version of the protocol. Such protocol downgrades &SHOULD-NOT; be
752   performed unless triggered by specific client attributes, such as when
753   one or more of the request header fields (e.g., <x:ref>User-Agent</x:ref>)
754   uniquely match the values sent by a client known to be in error.
757   The intention of HTTP's versioning design is that the major number
758   will only be incremented if an incompatible message syntax is
759   introduced, and that the minor number will only be incremented when
760   changes made to the protocol have the effect of adding to the message
761   semantics or implying additional capabilities of the sender.  However,
762   the minor version was not incremented for the changes introduced between
763   <xref target="RFC2068"/> and <xref target="RFC2616"/>, and this revision
764   has specifically avoiding any such changes to the protocol.
768<section title="Uniform Resource Identifiers" anchor="uri">
769<iref primary="true" item="resource"/>
771   Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) <xref target="RFC3986"/> are used
772   throughout HTTP as the means for identifying resources (&resource;).
773   URI references are used to target requests, indicate redirects, and define
774   relationships.
776  <x:anchor-alias value="URI-reference"/>
777  <x:anchor-alias value="absolute-URI"/>
778  <x:anchor-alias value="relative-part"/>
779  <x:anchor-alias value="authority"/>
780  <x:anchor-alias value="path-abempty"/>
781  <x:anchor-alias value="path-absolute"/>
782  <x:anchor-alias value="port"/>
783  <x:anchor-alias value="query"/>
784  <x:anchor-alias value="uri-host"/>
785  <x:anchor-alias value="partial-URI"/>
787   This specification adopts the definitions of "URI-reference",
788   "absolute-URI", "relative-part", "port", "host",
789   "path-abempty", "path-absolute", "query", and "authority" from the
790   URI generic syntax.
791   In addition, we define a partial-URI rule for protocol elements
792   that allow a relative URI but not a fragment.
794<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="URI-reference"><!--exported production--></iref><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="absolute-URI"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="authority"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="path-absolute"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="port"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="query"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="uri-host"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="partial-URI"><!--exported production--></iref>
795  <x:ref>URI-reference</x:ref> = &lt;URI-reference, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="4.1"/>&gt;
796  <x:ref>absolute-URI</x:ref>  = &lt;absolute-URI, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="4.3"/>&gt;
797  <x:ref>relative-part</x:ref> = &lt;relative-part, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="4.2"/>&gt;
798  <x:ref>authority</x:ref>     = &lt;authority, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2"/>&gt;
799  <x:ref>path-abempty</x:ref>  = &lt;path-abempty, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.3"/>&gt;
800  <x:ref>path-absolute</x:ref> = &lt;path-absolute, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.3"/>&gt;
801  <x:ref>port</x:ref>          = &lt;port, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2.3"/>&gt;
802  <x:ref>query</x:ref>         = &lt;query, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.4"/>&gt;
803  <x:ref>uri-host</x:ref>      = &lt;host, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2.2"/>&gt;
805  <x:ref>partial-URI</x:ref>   = relative-part [ "?" query ]
808   Each protocol element in HTTP that allows a URI reference will indicate
809   in its ABNF production whether the element allows any form of reference
810   (URI-reference), only a URI in absolute form (absolute-URI), only the
811   path and optional query components, or some combination of the above.
812   Unless otherwise indicated, URI references are parsed
813   relative to the effective request URI
814   (<xref target="effective.request.uri"/>).
817<section title="http URI scheme" anchor="http.uri">
818  <x:anchor-alias value="http-URI"/>
819  <iref item="http URI scheme" primary="true"/>
820  <iref item="URI scheme" subitem="http" primary="true"/>
822   The "http" URI scheme is hereby defined for the purpose of minting
823   identifiers according to their association with the hierarchical
824   namespace governed by a potential HTTP origin server listening for
825   TCP connections on a given port.
827<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="http-URI"><!--terminal production--></iref>
828  <x:ref>http-URI</x:ref> = "http:" "//" <x:ref>authority</x:ref> <x:ref>path-abempty</x:ref> [ "?" <x:ref>query</x:ref> ]
831   The HTTP origin server is identified by the generic syntax's
832   <x:ref>authority</x:ref> component, which includes a host identifier
833   and optional TCP port (<xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2.2"/>).
834   The remainder of the URI, consisting of both the hierarchical path
835   component and optional query component, serves as an identifier for
836   a potential resource within that origin server's name space.
839   If the host identifier is provided as an IP address,
840   then the origin server is any listener on the indicated TCP port at
841   that IP address. If host is a registered name, then that name is
842   considered an indirect identifier and the recipient might use a name
843   resolution service, such as DNS, to find the address of a listener
844   for that host.
845   The host &MUST-NOT; be empty; if an "http" URI is received with an
846   empty host, then it &MUST; be rejected as invalid.
847   If the port subcomponent is empty or not given, then TCP port 80 is
848   assumed (the default reserved port for WWW services).
851   Regardless of the form of host identifier, access to that host is not
852   implied by the mere presence of its name or address. The host might or might
853   not exist and, even when it does exist, might or might not be running an
854   HTTP server or listening to the indicated port. The "http" URI scheme
855   makes use of the delegated nature of Internet names and addresses to
856   establish a naming authority (whatever entity has the ability to place
857   an HTTP server at that Internet name or address) and allows that
858   authority to determine which names are valid and how they might be used.
861   When an "http" URI is used within a context that calls for access to the
862   indicated resource, a client &MAY; attempt access by resolving
863   the host to an IP address, establishing a TCP connection to that address
864   on the indicated port, and sending an HTTP request message
865   (<xref target="http.message"/>) containing the URI's identifying data
866   (<xref target="message.routing"/>) to the server.
867   If the server responds to that request with a non-interim HTTP response
868   message, as described in &status-codes;, then that response
869   is considered an authoritative answer to the client's request.
872   Although HTTP is independent of the transport protocol, the "http"
873   scheme is specific to TCP-based services because the name delegation
874   process depends on TCP for establishing authority.
875   An HTTP service based on some other underlying connection protocol
876   would presumably be identified using a different URI scheme, just as
877   the "https" scheme (below) is used for resources that require an
878   end-to-end secured connection. Other protocols might also be used to
879   provide access to "http" identified resources &mdash; it is only the
880   authoritative interface used for mapping the namespace that is
881   specific to TCP.
884   The URI generic syntax for authority also includes a deprecated
885   userinfo subcomponent (<xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2.1"/>)
886   for including user authentication information in the URI.  Some
887   implementations make use of the userinfo component for internal
888   configuration of authentication information, such as within command
889   invocation options, configuration files, or bookmark lists, even
890   though such usage might expose a user identifier or password.
891   Senders &MUST; exclude the userinfo subcomponent (and its "@"
892   delimiter) when an "http" URI is transmitted within a message as a
893   request target or header field value.
894   Recipients of an "http" URI reference &SHOULD; parse for userinfo and
895   treat its presence as an error, since it is likely being used to obscure
896   the authority for the sake of phishing attacks.
900<section title="https URI scheme" anchor="https.uri">
901   <x:anchor-alias value="https-URI"/>
902   <iref item="https URI scheme"/>
903   <iref item="URI scheme" subitem="https"/>
905   The "https" URI scheme is hereby defined for the purpose of minting
906   identifiers according to their association with the hierarchical
907   namespace governed by a potential HTTP origin server listening to a
908   given TCP port for TLS-secured connections <xref target="RFC5246"/>.
911   All of the requirements listed above for the "http" scheme are also
912   requirements for the "https" scheme, except that a default TCP port
913   of 443 is assumed if the port subcomponent is empty or not given,
914   and the TCP connection &MUST; be secured, end-to-end, through the
915   use of strong encryption prior to sending the first HTTP request.
917<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="https-URI"><!--terminal production--></iref>
918  <x:ref>https-URI</x:ref> = "https:" "//" <x:ref>authority</x:ref> <x:ref>path-abempty</x:ref> [ "?" <x:ref>query</x:ref> ]
921   Resources made available via the "https" scheme have no shared
922   identity with the "http" scheme even if their resource identifiers
923   indicate the same authority (the same host listening to the same
924   TCP port).  They are distinct name spaces and are considered to be
925   distinct origin servers.  However, an extension to HTTP that is
926   defined to apply to entire host domains, such as the Cookie protocol
927   <xref target="RFC6265"/>, can allow information
928   set by one service to impact communication with other services
929   within a matching group of host domains.
932   The process for authoritative access to an "https" identified
933   resource is defined in <xref target="RFC2818"/>.
937<section title="http and https URI Normalization and Comparison" anchor="uri.comparison">
939   Since the "http" and "https" schemes conform to the URI generic syntax,
940   such URIs are normalized and compared according to the algorithm defined
941   in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="6"/>, using the defaults
942   described above for each scheme.
945   If the port is equal to the default port for a scheme, the normal form is
946   to elide the port subcomponent. When not being used in absolute form as the
947   request target of an OPTIONS request, an empty path component is equivalent
948   to an absolute path of "/", so the normal form is to provide a path of "/"
949   instead. The scheme and host are case-insensitive and normally provided in
950   lowercase; all other components are compared in a case-sensitive manner.
951   Characters other than those in the "reserved" set are equivalent to their
952   percent-encoded octets (see <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt=","
953   x:sec="2.1"/>): the normal form is to not encode them.
956   For example, the following three URIs are equivalent:
958<figure><artwork type="example">
967<section title="Message Format" anchor="http.message">
968<x:anchor-alias value="generic-message"/>
969<x:anchor-alias value="message.types"/>
970<x:anchor-alias value="HTTP-message"/>
971<x:anchor-alias value="start-line"/>
972<iref item="header section"/>
973<iref item="headers"/>
974<iref item="header field"/>
976   All HTTP/1.1 messages consist of a start-line followed by a sequence of
977   octets in a format similar to the Internet Message Format
978   <xref target="RFC5322"/>: zero or more header fields (collectively
979   referred to as the "headers" or the "header section"), an empty line
980   indicating the end of the header section, and an optional message body.
982<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HTTP-message"><!--terminal production--></iref>
983  <x:ref>HTTP-message</x:ref>   = <x:ref>start-line</x:ref>
984                   *( <x:ref>header-field</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref> )
985                   <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
986                   [ <x:ref>message-body</x:ref> ]
989   The normal procedure for parsing an HTTP message is to read the
990   start-line into a structure, read each header field into a hash
991   table by field name until the empty line, and then use the parsed
992   data to determine if a message body is expected.  If a message body
993   has been indicated, then it is read as a stream until an amount
994   of octets equal to the message body length is read or the connection
995   is closed.
998   Recipients &MUST; parse an HTTP message as a sequence of octets in an
999   encoding that is a superset of US-ASCII <xref target="USASCII"/>.
1000   Parsing an HTTP message as a stream of Unicode characters, without regard
1001   for the specific encoding, creates security vulnerabilities due to the
1002   varying ways that string processing libraries handle invalid multibyte
1003   character sequences that contain the octet LF (%x0A).  String-based
1004   parsers can only be safely used within protocol elements after the element
1005   has been extracted from the message, such as within a header field-value
1006   after message parsing has delineated the individual fields.
1009   An HTTP message can be parsed as a stream for incremental processing or
1010   forwarding downstream.  However, recipients cannot rely on incremental
1011   delivery of partial messages, since some implementations will buffer or
1012   delay message forwarding for the sake of network efficiency, security
1013   checks, or payload transformations.
1016<section title="Start Line" anchor="start.line">
1017  <x:anchor-alias value="Start-Line"/>
1019   An HTTP message can either be a request from client to server or a
1020   response from server to client.  Syntactically, the two types of message
1021   differ only in the start-line, which is either a request-line (for requests)
1022   or a status-line (for responses), and in the algorithm for determining
1023   the length of the message body (<xref target="message.body"/>).
1026   In theory, a client could receive requests and a server could receive
1027   responses, distinguishing them by their different start-line formats,
1028   but in practice servers are implemented to only expect a request
1029   (a response is interpreted as an unknown or invalid request method)
1030   and clients are implemented to only expect a response.
1032<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="start-line"/>
1033  <x:ref>start-line</x:ref>     = <x:ref>request-line</x:ref> / <x:ref>status-line</x:ref>
1036   A sender &MUST-NOT; send whitespace between the start-line and
1037   the first header field. The presence of such whitespace in a request
1038   might be an attempt to trick a server into ignoring that field or
1039   processing the line after it as a new request, either of which might
1040   result in a security vulnerability if other implementations within
1041   the request chain interpret the same message differently.
1042   Likewise, the presence of such whitespace in a response might be
1043   ignored by some clients or cause others to cease parsing.
1046   A recipient that receives whitespace between the start-line and
1047   the first header field &MUST; either reject the message as invalid or
1048   consume each whitespace-preceded line without further processing of it
1049   (i.e., ignore the entire line, along with any subsequent lines preceded
1050   by whitespace, until a properly formed header field is received or the
1051   header block is terminated).
1054<section title="Request Line" anchor="request.line">
1055  <x:anchor-alias value="Request"/>
1056  <x:anchor-alias value="request-line"/>
1058   A request-line begins with a method token, followed by a single
1059   space (SP), the request-target, another single space (SP), the
1060   protocol version, and ending with CRLF.
1062<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="request-line"/>
1063  <x:ref>request-line</x:ref>   = <x:ref>method</x:ref> <x:ref>SP</x:ref> <x:ref>request-target</x:ref> <x:ref>SP</x:ref> <x:ref>HTTP-version</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1065<iref primary="true" item="method"/>
1066<t anchor="method">
1067   The method token indicates the request method to be performed on the
1068   target resource. The request method is case-sensitive.
1070<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="method"/>
1071  <x:ref>method</x:ref>         = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
1074   The methods defined by this specification can be found in
1075   &methods;, along with information regarding the HTTP method registry
1076   and considerations for defining new methods.
1078<iref item="request-target"/>
1080   The request-target identifies the target resource upon which to apply
1081   the request, as defined in <xref target="request-target"/>.
1084   No whitespace is allowed inside the method, request-target, and
1085   protocol version.  Hence, recipients typically parse the request-line
1086   into its component parts by splitting on whitespace
1087   (see <xref target="message.robustness"/>).
1090   Unfortunately, some user agents fail to properly encode hypertext
1091   references that have embedded whitespace, sending the characters directly
1092   instead of properly encoding or excluding the disallowed characters.
1093   Recipients of an invalid request-line &SHOULD; respond with either a
1094   <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> error or a <x:ref>301 (Moved Permanently)</x:ref>
1095   redirect with the request-target properly encoded.  Recipients &SHOULD-NOT;
1096   attempt to autocorrect and then process the request without a redirect,
1097   since the invalid request-line might be deliberately crafted to bypass
1098   security filters along the request chain.
1101   HTTP does not place a pre-defined limit on the length of a request-line.
1102   A server that receives a method longer than any that it implements
1103   &SHOULD; respond with either a <x:ref>405 (Method Not Allowed)</x:ref>, if it is an origin
1104   server, or a <x:ref>501 (Not Implemented)</x:ref> status code.
1105   A server &MUST; be prepared to receive URIs of unbounded length and
1106   respond with the <x:ref>414 (URI Too Long)</x:ref> status code if the received
1107   request-target would be longer than the server wishes to handle
1108   (see &status-414;).
1111   Various ad-hoc limitations on request-line length are found in practice.
1112   It is &RECOMMENDED; that all HTTP senders and recipients support, at a
1113   minimum, request-line lengths of 8000 octets.
1117<section title="Status Line" anchor="status.line">
1118  <x:anchor-alias value="response"/>
1119  <x:anchor-alias value="status-line"/>
1120  <x:anchor-alias value="status-code"/>
1121  <x:anchor-alias value="reason-phrase"/>
1123   The first line of a response message is the status-line, consisting
1124   of the protocol version, a space (SP), the status code, another space,
1125   a possibly-empty textual phrase describing the status code, and
1126   ending with CRLF.
1128<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="status-line"/>
1129  <x:ref>status-line</x:ref> = <x:ref>HTTP-version</x:ref> <x:ref>SP</x:ref> <x:ref>status-code</x:ref> <x:ref>SP</x:ref> <x:ref>reason-phrase</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1132   The status-code element is a 3-digit integer code describing the
1133   result of the server's attempt to understand and satisfy the client's
1134   corresponding request. The rest of the response message is to be
1135   interpreted in light of the semantics defined for that status code.
1136   See &status-codes; for information about the semantics of status codes,
1137   including the classes of status code (indicated by the first digit),
1138   the status codes defined by this specification, considerations for the
1139   definition of new status codes, and the IANA registry.
1141<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="status-code"/>
1142  <x:ref>status-code</x:ref>    = 3<x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref>
1145   The reason-phrase element exists for the sole purpose of providing a
1146   textual description associated with the numeric status code, mostly
1147   out of deference to earlier Internet application protocols that were more
1148   frequently used with interactive text clients. A client &SHOULD; ignore
1149   the reason-phrase content.
1151<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="reason-phrase"/>
1152  <x:ref>reason-phrase</x:ref>  = *( <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> )
1157<section title="Header Fields" anchor="header.fields">
1158  <x:anchor-alias value="header-field"/>
1159  <x:anchor-alias value="field-content"/>
1160  <x:anchor-alias value="field-name"/>
1161  <x:anchor-alias value="field-value"/>
1162  <x:anchor-alias value="obs-fold"/>
1164   Each HTTP header field consists of a case-insensitive field name
1165   followed by a colon (":"), optional whitespace, and the field value.
1167<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="header-field"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="field-name"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="field-value"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="field-content"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="obs-fold"/>
1168  <x:ref>header-field</x:ref>   = <x:ref>field-name</x:ref> ":" <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> <x:ref>field-value</x:ref> <x:ref>BWS</x:ref>
1169  <x:ref>field-name</x:ref>     = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
1170  <x:ref>field-value</x:ref>    = *( <x:ref>field-content</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-fold</x:ref> )
1171  <x:ref>field-content</x:ref>  = *( <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> )
1172  <x:ref>obs-fold</x:ref>       = <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref> ( <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> )
1173                 ; obsolete line folding
1174                 ; see <xref target="field.parsing"/>
1177   The field-name token labels the corresponding field-value as having the
1178   semantics defined by that header field.  For example, the <x:ref>Date</x:ref>
1179   header field is defined in &header-date; as containing the origination
1180   timestamp for the message in which it appears.
1183<section title="Field Extensibility" anchor="field.extensibility">
1185   HTTP header fields are fully extensible: there is no limit on the
1186   introduction of new field names, each presumably defining new semantics,
1187   nor on the number of header fields used in a given message.  Existing
1188   fields are defined in each part of this specification and in many other
1189   specifications outside the core standard.
1190   New header fields can be introduced without changing the protocol version
1191   if their defined semantics allow them to be safely ignored by recipients
1192   that do not recognize them.
1195   New HTTP header fields ought to be be registered with IANA in the
1196   Message Header Field Registry, as described in &iana-header-registry;.
1197   A proxy &MUST; forward unrecognized header fields unless the
1198   field-name is listed in the <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field
1199   (<xref target="header.connection"/>) or the proxy is specifically
1200   configured to block, or otherwise transform, such fields.
1201   Other recipients &SHOULD; ignore unrecognized header fields.
1205<section title="Field Order" anchor="field.order">
1207   The order in which header fields with differing field names are
1208   received is not significant. However, it is "good practice" to send
1209   header fields that contain control data first, such as <x:ref>Host</x:ref>
1210   on requests and <x:ref>Date</x:ref> on responses, so that implementations
1211   can decide when not to handle a message as early as possible.  A server
1212   &MUST; wait until the entire header section is received before interpreting
1213   a request message, since later header fields might include conditionals,
1214   authentication credentials, or deliberately misleading duplicate
1215   header fields that would impact request processing.
1218   A sender &MUST-NOT; generate multiple header fields with the same field
1219   name in a message unless either the entire field value for that
1220   header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)]
1221   or the header field is a well-known exception (as noted below).
1224   Multiple header fields with the same field name can be combined into
1225   one "field-name: field-value" pair, without changing the semantics of the
1226   message, by appending each subsequent field value to the combined
1227   field value in order, separated by a comma. The order in which
1228   header fields with the same field name are received is therefore
1229   significant to the interpretation of the combined field value;
1230   a proxy &MUST-NOT; change the order of these field values when
1231   forwarding a message.
1234  <t>
1235   &Note; In practice, the "Set-Cookie" header field (<xref target="RFC6265"/>)
1236   often appears multiple times in a response message and does not use the
1237   list syntax, violating the above requirements on multiple header fields
1238   with the same name. Since it cannot be combined into a single field-value,
1239   recipients ought to handle "Set-Cookie" as a special case while processing
1240   header fields. (See Appendix A.2.3 of <xref target="Kri2001"/> for details.)
1241  </t>
1245<section title="Whitespace" anchor="whitespace">
1246<t anchor="rule.LWS">
1247   This specification uses three rules to denote the use of linear
1248   whitespace: OWS (optional whitespace), RWS (required whitespace), and
1249   BWS ("bad" whitespace).
1251<t anchor="rule.OWS">
1252   The OWS rule is used where zero or more linear whitespace octets might
1253   appear. OWS &SHOULD; either not be generated or be generated as a single
1254   SP. Multiple OWS octets that occur within field-content &SHOULD; either
1255   be replaced with a single SP or transformed to all SP octets (each
1256   octet other than SP replaced with SP) before interpreting the field value
1257   or forwarding the message downstream.
1259<t anchor="rule.RWS">
1260   RWS is used when at least one linear whitespace octet is required to
1261   separate field tokens. RWS &SHOULD; be generated as a single SP.
1262   Multiple RWS octets that occur within field-content &SHOULD; either
1263   be replaced with a single SP or transformed to all SP octets before
1264   interpreting the field value or forwarding the message downstream.
1266<t anchor="rule.BWS">
1267   BWS is used where the grammar allows optional whitespace, for historical
1268   reasons, but senders &SHOULD-NOT; generate it in messages;
1269   recipients &MUST; accept such bad optional whitespace and remove it before
1270   interpreting the field value or forwarding the message downstream.
1272<t anchor="rule.whitespace">
1273  <x:anchor-alias value="BWS"/>
1274  <x:anchor-alias value="OWS"/>
1275  <x:anchor-alias value="RWS"/>
1277<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="OWS"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="RWS"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="BWS"/>
1278  <x:ref>OWS</x:ref>            = *( <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> )
1279                 ; optional whitespace
1280  <x:ref>RWS</x:ref>            = 1*( <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> )
1281                 ; required whitespace
1282  <x:ref>BWS</x:ref>            = <x:ref>OWS</x:ref>
1283                 ; "bad" whitespace
1287<section title="Field Parsing" anchor="field.parsing">
1289   No whitespace is allowed between the header field-name and colon.
1290   In the past, differences in the handling of such whitespace have led to
1291   security vulnerabilities in request routing and response handling.
1292   A server &MUST; reject any received request message that contains
1293   whitespace between a header field-name and colon with a response code of
1294   <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref>. A proxy &MUST; remove any such whitespace
1295   from a response message before forwarding the message downstream.
1298   A field value is preceded by optional whitespace (OWS); a single SP is
1299   preferred. The field value does not include any leading or trailing white
1300   space: OWS occurring before the first non-whitespace octet of the
1301   field value or after the last non-whitespace octet of the field value
1302   is ignored and &SHOULD; be removed before further processing (as this does
1303   not change the meaning of the header field).
1306   Historically, HTTP header field values could be extended over multiple
1307   lines by preceding each extra line with at least one space or horizontal
1308   tab (obs-fold). This specification deprecates such line
1309   folding except within the message/http media type
1310   (<xref target=""/>).
1311   Senders &MUST-NOT; generate messages that include line folding
1312   (i.e., that contain any field-value that matches the obs-fold rule) unless
1313   the message is intended for packaging within the message/http media type.
1314   Recipients &MUST; accept line folding and replace any embedded
1315   obs-fold whitespace with either a single SP or a matching number of SP
1316   octets (to avoid buffer copying) prior to interpreting the field value or
1317   forwarding the message downstream.
1320   Historically, HTTP has allowed field content with text in the ISO-8859-1
1321   <xref target="ISO-8859-1"/> charset, supporting other charsets only
1322   through use of <xref target="RFC2047"/> encoding.
1323   In practice, most HTTP header field values use only a subset of the
1324   US-ASCII charset <xref target="USASCII"/>. Newly defined
1325   header fields &SHOULD; limit their field values to US-ASCII octets.
1326   Recipients &SHOULD; treat other octets in field content (obs-text) as
1327   opaque data.
1331<section title="Field Limits" anchor="field.limits">
1333   HTTP does not place a pre-defined limit on the length of each header field
1334   or on the length of the header block as a whole.  Various ad-hoc
1335   limitations on individual header field length are found in practice,
1336   often depending on the specific field semantics.
1339   A server &MUST; be prepared to receive request header fields of unbounded
1340   length and respond with an appropriate <x:ref>4xx (Client Error)</x:ref>
1341   status code if the received header field(s) are larger than the server
1342   wishes to process.
1345   A client &MUST; be prepared to receive response header fields of unbounded
1346   length. A client &MAY; discard or truncate received header fields that are
1347   larger than the client wishes to process if the field semantics are such
1348   that the dropped value(s) can be safely ignored without changing the
1349   response semantics.
1353<section title="Field value components" anchor="field.components">
1354<t anchor="rule.token.separators">
1355  <x:anchor-alias value="tchar"/>
1356  <x:anchor-alias value="token"/>
1357  <x:anchor-alias value="special"/>
1358  <x:anchor-alias value="word"/>
1359   Many HTTP header field values consist of words (token or quoted-string)
1360   separated by whitespace or special characters. These special characters
1361   &MUST; be in a quoted string to be used within a parameter value (as defined
1362   in <xref target="transfer.codings"/>).
1364<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="word"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="token"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="tchar"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="special"><!--unused production--></iref>
1365  <x:ref>word</x:ref>           = <x:ref>token</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-string</x:ref>
1367  <x:ref>token</x:ref>          = 1*<x:ref>tchar</x:ref>
1369  IMPORTANT: when editing "tchar" make sure that "special" is updated accordingly!!!
1370 -->
1371  <x:ref>tchar</x:ref>          = "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&amp;" / "'" / "*"
1372                 / "+" / "-" / "." / "^" / "_" / "`" / "|" / "~"
1373                 / <x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref> / <x:ref>ALPHA</x:ref>
1374                 ; any <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref>, except <x:ref>special</x:ref>
1376  <x:ref>special</x:ref>        = "(" / ")" / "&lt;" / ">" / "@" / ","
1377                 / ";" / ":" / "\" / DQUOTE / "/" / "["
1378                 / "]" / "?" / "=" / "{" / "}"
1380<t anchor="rule.quoted-string">
1381  <x:anchor-alias value="quoted-string"/>
1382  <x:anchor-alias value="qdtext"/>
1383  <x:anchor-alias value="obs-text"/>
1384   A string of text is parsed as a single word if it is quoted using
1385   double-quote marks.
1387<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="quoted-string"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="qdtext"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="obs-text"/>
1388  <x:ref>quoted-string</x:ref>  = <x:ref>DQUOTE</x:ref> *( <x:ref>qdtext</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-pair</x:ref> ) <x:ref>DQUOTE</x:ref>
1389  <x:ref>qdtext</x:ref>         = <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> /%x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref>
1390  <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref>       = %x80-FF
1392<t anchor="rule.quoted-pair">
1393  <x:anchor-alias value="quoted-pair"/>
1394   The backslash octet ("\") can be used as a single-octet
1395   quoting mechanism within quoted-string constructs:
1397<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="quoted-pair"/>
1398  <x:ref>quoted-pair</x:ref>    = "\" ( <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> )
1401   Recipients that process the value of a quoted-string &MUST; handle a
1402   quoted-pair as if it were replaced by the octet following the backslash.
1405   Senders &SHOULD-NOT; generate a quoted-pair in a quoted-string except where
1406   necessary to quote DQUOTE and backslash octets occurring within that string.
1408<t anchor="rule.comment">
1409  <x:anchor-alias value="comment"/>
1410  <x:anchor-alias value="ctext"/>
1411   Comments can be included in some HTTP header fields by surrounding
1412   the comment text with parentheses. Comments are only allowed in
1413   fields containing "comment" as part of their field value definition.
1415<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="comment"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="ctext"/>
1416  <x:ref>comment</x:ref>        = "(" *( <x:ref>ctext</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-cpair</x:ref> / <x:ref>comment</x:ref> ) ")"
1417  <x:ref>ctext</x:ref>          = <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / %x21-27 / %x2A-5B / %x5D-7E / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref>
1419<t anchor="rule.quoted-cpair">
1420  <x:anchor-alias value="quoted-cpair"/>
1421   The backslash octet ("\") can be used as a single-octet
1422   quoting mechanism within comment constructs:
1424<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="quoted-cpair"/>
1425  <x:ref>quoted-cpair</x:ref>   = "\" ( <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> )
1428   Senders &SHOULD-NOT; escape octets in comments that do not require escaping
1429   (i.e., other than the backslash octet "\" and the parentheses "(" and ")").
1435<section title="Message Body" anchor="message.body">
1436  <x:anchor-alias value="message-body"/>
1438   The message body (if any) of an HTTP message is used to carry the
1439   payload body of that request or response.  The message body is
1440   identical to the payload body unless a transfer coding has been
1441   applied, as described in <xref target="header.transfer-encoding"/>.
1443<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="message-body"/>
1444  <x:ref>message-body</x:ref> = *OCTET
1447   The rules for when a message body is allowed in a message differ for
1448   requests and responses.
1451   The presence of a message body in a request is signaled by a
1452   <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> or <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header
1453   field. Request message framing is independent of method semantics,
1454   even if the method does not define any use for a message body.
1457   The presence of a message body in a response depends on both
1458   the request method to which it is responding and the response
1459   status code (<xref target="status.line"/>).
1460   Responses to the HEAD request method never include a message body
1461   because the associated response header fields (e.g.,
1462   <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref>, <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref>, etc.),
1463   if present, indicate only what their values would have been if the request
1464   method had been GET (&HEAD;).
1465   <x:ref>2xx (Successful)</x:ref> responses to CONNECT switch to tunnel
1466   mode instead of having a message body (&CONNECT;).
1467   All <x:ref>1xx (Informational)</x:ref>, <x:ref>204 (No Content)</x:ref>, and
1468   <x:ref>304 (Not Modified)</x:ref> responses &MUST-NOT; include a message body.
1469   All other responses do include a message body, although the body
1470   &MAY; be of zero length.
1473<section title="Transfer-Encoding" anchor="header.transfer-encoding">
1474  <iref primary="true" item="Transfer-Encoding header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
1475  <iref item="chunked (Coding Format)"/>
1476  <x:anchor-alias value="Transfer-Encoding"/>
1478   The Transfer-Encoding header field lists the transfer coding names
1479   corresponding to the sequence of transfer codings that have been
1480   (or will be) applied to the payload body in order to form the message body.
1481   Transfer codings are defined in <xref target="transfer.codings"/>.
1483<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Transfer-Encoding"/>
1484  <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> = 1#<x:ref>transfer-coding</x:ref>
1487   Transfer-Encoding is analogous to the Content-Transfer-Encoding field of
1488   MIME, which was designed to enable safe transport of binary data over a
1489   7-bit transport service (<xref target="RFC2045" x:fmt="," x:sec="6"/>).
1490   However, safe transport has a different focus for an 8bit-clean transfer
1491   protocol. In HTTP's case, Transfer-Encoding is primarily intended to
1492   accurately delimit a dynamically generated payload and to distinguish
1493   payload encodings that are only applied for transport efficiency or
1494   security from those that are characteristics of the selected resource.
1497   All HTTP/1.1 recipients &MUST; implement the chunked transfer coding
1498   (<xref target="chunked.encoding"/>) because it plays a crucial role in
1499   framing messages when the payload body size is not known in advance.
1500   If chunked is applied to a payload body, the sender &MUST-NOT; apply
1501   chunked more than once (i.e., chunking an already chunked message is not
1502   allowed).
1503   If any transfer coding is applied to a request payload body, the
1504   sender &MUST; apply chunked as the final transfer coding to ensure that
1505   the message is properly framed.
1506   If any transfer coding is applied to a response payload body, the
1507   sender &MUST; either apply chunked as the final transfer coding or
1508   terminate the message by closing the connection.
1511   For example,
1512</preamble><artwork type="example">
1513  Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked
1515   indicates that the payload body has been compressed using the gzip
1516   coding and then chunked using the chunked coding while forming the
1517   message body.
1520   Unlike <x:ref>Content-Encoding</x:ref> (&content-codings;),
1521   Transfer-Encoding is a property of the message, not of the payload, and
1522   any recipient along the request/response chain &MAY; decode the received
1523   transfer coding(s) or apply additional transfer coding(s) to the message
1524   body, assuming that corresponding changes are made to the Transfer-Encoding
1525   field-value. Additional information about the encoding parameters &MAY; be
1526   provided by other header fields not defined by this specification.
1529   Transfer-Encoding &MAY; be sent in a response to a HEAD request or in a
1530   <x:ref>304 (Not Modified)</x:ref> response (&status-304;) to a GET request,
1531   neither of which includes a message body,
1532   to indicate that the origin server would have applied a transfer coding
1533   to the message body if the request had been an unconditional GET.
1534   This indication is not required, however, because any recipient on
1535   the response chain (including the origin server) can remove transfer
1536   codings when they are not needed.
1539   Transfer-Encoding was added in HTTP/1.1.  It is generally assumed that
1540   implementations advertising only HTTP/1.0 support will not understand
1541   how to process a transfer-encoded payload.
1542   A client &MUST-NOT; send a request containing Transfer-Encoding unless it
1543   knows the server will handle HTTP/1.1 (or later) requests; such knowledge
1544   might be in the form of specific user configuration or by remembering the
1545   version of a prior received response.
1546   A server &MUST-NOT; send a response containing Transfer-Encoding unless
1547   the corresponding request indicates HTTP/1.1 (or later).
1550   A server that receives a request message with a transfer coding it does
1551   not understand &SHOULD; respond with <x:ref>501 (Not Implemented)</x:ref>.
1555<section title="Content-Length" anchor="header.content-length">
1556  <iref primary="true" item="Content-Length header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
1557  <x:anchor-alias value="Content-Length"/>
1559   When a message does not have a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header
1560   field, a Content-Length header field can provide the anticipated size,
1561   as a decimal number of octets, for a potential payload body.
1562   For messages that do include a payload body, the Content-Length field-value
1563   provides the framing information necessary for determining where the body
1564   (and message) ends.  For messages that do not include a payload body, the
1565   Content-Length indicates the size of the selected representation
1566   (&selected-representation;).
1568<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Content-Length"/>
1569  <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> = 1*<x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref>
1572   An example is
1574<figure><artwork type="example">
1575  Content-Length: 3495
1578   A sender &MUST-NOT; send a Content-Length header field in any message that
1579   contains a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header field.
1582   A user agent &SHOULD; send a Content-Length in a request message when no
1583   <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> is sent and the request method defines
1584   a meaning for an enclosed payload body. For example, a Content-Length
1585   header field is normally sent in a POST request even when the value is
1586   0 (indicating an empty payload body).  A user agent &SHOULD-NOT; send a
1587   Content-Length header field when the request message does not contain a
1588   payload body and the method semantics do not anticipate such a body.
1591   A server &MAY; send a Content-Length header field in a response to a HEAD
1592   request (&HEAD;); a server &MUST-NOT; send Content-Length in such a
1593   response unless its field-value equals the decimal number of octets that
1594   would have been sent in the payload body of a response if the same
1595   request had used the GET method.
1598   A server &MAY; send a Content-Length header field in a
1599   <x:ref>304 (Not Modified)</x:ref> response to a conditional GET request
1600   (&status-304;); a server &MUST-NOT; send Content-Length in such a
1601   response unless its field-value equals the decimal number of octets that
1602   would have been sent in the payload body of a <x:ref>200 (OK)</x:ref>
1603   response to the same request.
1606   A server &MUST-NOT; send a Content-Length header field in any response
1607   with a status code of
1608   <x:ref>1xx (Informational)</x:ref> or <x:ref>204 (No Content)</x:ref>.
1609   A server &SHOULD-NOT; send a Content-Length header field in any
1610   <x:ref>2xx (Successful)</x:ref> response to a CONNECT request (&CONNECT;).
1613   Aside from the cases defined above, in the absence of Transfer-Encoding,
1614   an origin server &SHOULD; send a Content-Length header field when the
1615   payload body size is known prior to sending the complete header block.
1616   This will allow downstream recipients to measure transfer progress,
1617   know when a received message is complete, and potentially reuse the
1618   connection for additional requests.
1621   Any Content-Length field value greater than or equal to zero is valid.
1622   Since there is no predefined limit to the length of an HTTP payload,
1623   recipients &SHOULD; anticipate potentially large decimal numerals and
1624   prevent parsing errors due to integer conversion overflows
1625   (<xref target="attack.protocol.element.size.overflows"/>).
1628   If a message is received that has multiple Content-Length header fields
1629   with field-values consisting of the same decimal value, or a single
1630   Content-Length header field with a field value containing a list of
1631   identical decimal values (e.g., "Content-Length: 42, 42"), indicating that
1632   duplicate Content-Length header fields have been generated or combined by an
1633   upstream message processor, then the recipient &MUST; either reject the
1634   message as invalid or replace the duplicated field-values with a single
1635   valid Content-Length field containing that decimal value prior to
1636   determining the message body length.
1639  <t>
1640   &Note; HTTP's use of Content-Length for message framing differs
1641   significantly from the same field's use in MIME, where it is an optional
1642   field used only within the "message/external-body" media-type.
1643  </t>
1647<section title="Message Body Length" anchor="message.body.length">
1648  <iref item="chunked (Coding Format)"/>
1650   The length of a message body is determined by one of the following
1651   (in order of precedence):
1654  <list style="numbers">
1655    <x:lt><t>
1656     Any response to a HEAD request and any response with a
1657     <x:ref>1xx (Informational)</x:ref>, <x:ref>204 (No Content)</x:ref>, or
1658     <x:ref>304 (Not Modified)</x:ref> status code is always
1659     terminated by the first empty line after the header fields, regardless of
1660     the header fields present in the message, and thus cannot contain a
1661     message body.
1662    </t></x:lt>
1663    <x:lt><t>
1664     Any <x:ref>2xx (Successful)</x:ref> response to a CONNECT request implies that the
1665     connection will become a tunnel immediately after the empty line that
1666     concludes the header fields.  A client &MUST; ignore any
1667     <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> or <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header
1668     fields received in such a message.
1669    </t></x:lt>
1670    <x:lt><t>
1671     If a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header field is present
1672     and the chunked transfer coding (<xref target="chunked.encoding"/>)
1673     is the final encoding, the message body length is determined by reading
1674     and decoding the chunked data until the transfer coding indicates the
1675     data is complete.
1676    </t>
1677    <t>
1678     If a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header field is present in a
1679     response and the chunked transfer coding is not the final encoding, the
1680     message body length is determined by reading the connection until it is
1681     closed by the server.
1682     If a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header field is present in a request and the
1683     chunked transfer coding is not the final encoding, the message body
1684     length cannot be determined reliably; the server &MUST; respond with
1685     the <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> status code and then close the connection.
1686    </t>
1687    <t>
1688     If a message is received with both a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref>
1689     and a <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header field, the Transfer-Encoding
1690     overrides the Content-Length. Such a message might indicate an attempt
1691     to perform request or response smuggling (bypass of security-related
1692     checks on message routing or content) and thus ought to be handled as
1693     an error.  A sender &MUST; remove the received Content-Length field
1694     prior to forwarding such a message downstream.
1695    </t></x:lt>
1696    <x:lt><t>
1697     If a message is received without <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> and with
1698     either multiple <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header fields having
1699     differing field-values or a single Content-Length header field having an
1700     invalid value, then the message framing is invalid and &MUST; be treated
1701     as an error to prevent request or response smuggling.
1702     If this is a request message, the server &MUST; respond with
1703     a <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> status code and then close the connection.
1704     If this is a response message received by a proxy, the proxy
1705     &MUST; discard the received response, send a <x:ref>502 (Bad Gateway)</x:ref>
1706     status code as its downstream response, and then close the connection.
1707     If this is a response message received by a user agent, it &MUST; be
1708     treated as an error by discarding the message and closing the connection.
1709    </t></x:lt>
1710    <x:lt><t>
1711     If a valid <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header field is present without
1712     <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref>, its decimal value defines the
1713     expected message body length in octets.
1714     If the sender closes the connection or the recipient times out before the
1715     indicated number of octets are received, the recipient &MUST; consider
1716     the message to be incomplete and close the connection.
1717    </t></x:lt>
1718    <x:lt><t>
1719     If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then the
1720     message body length is zero (no message body is present).
1721    </t></x:lt>
1722    <x:lt><t>
1723     Otherwise, this is a response message without a declared message body
1724     length, so the message body length is determined by the number of octets
1725     received prior to the server closing the connection.
1726    </t></x:lt>
1727  </list>
1730   Since there is no way to distinguish a successfully completed,
1731   close-delimited message from a partially-received message interrupted
1732   by network failure, a server &SHOULD; use encoding or
1733   length-delimited messages whenever possible.  The close-delimiting
1734   feature exists primarily for backwards compatibility with HTTP/1.0.
1737   A server &MAY; reject a request that contains a message body but
1738   not a <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> by responding with
1739   <x:ref>411 (Length Required)</x:ref>.
1742   Unless a transfer coding other than chunked has been applied,
1743   a client that sends a request containing a message body &SHOULD;
1744   use a valid <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header field if the message body
1745   length is known in advance, rather than the chunked transfer coding, since some
1746   existing services respond to chunked with a <x:ref>411 (Length Required)</x:ref>
1747   status code even though they understand the chunked transfer coding.  This
1748   is typically because such services are implemented via a gateway that
1749   requires a content-length in advance of being called and the server
1750   is unable or unwilling to buffer the entire request before processing.
1753   A user agent that sends a request containing a message body &MUST; send a
1754   valid <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header field if it does not know the
1755   server will handle HTTP/1.1 (or later) requests; such knowledge can be in
1756   the form of specific user configuration or by remembering the version of a
1757   prior received response.
1760   If the final response to the last request on a connection has been
1761   completely received and there remains additional data to read, a user agent
1762   &MAY; discard the remaining data or attempt to determine if that data
1763   belongs as part of the prior response body, which might be the case if the
1764   prior message's Content-Length value is incorrect. A client &MUST-NOT;
1765   process, cache, or forward such extra data as a separate response, since
1766   such behavior would be vulnerable to cache poisoning.
1771<section anchor="incomplete.messages" title="Handling Incomplete Messages">
1773   A server that receives an incomplete request message, usually due to a
1774   canceled request or a triggered time-out exception, &MAY; send an error
1775   response prior to closing the connection.
1778   A client that receives an incomplete response message, which can occur
1779   when a connection is closed prematurely or when decoding a supposedly
1780   chunked transfer coding fails, &MUST; record the message as incomplete.
1781   Cache requirements for incomplete responses are defined in
1782   &cache-incomplete;.
1785   If a response terminates in the middle of the header block (before the
1786   empty line is received) and the status code might rely on header fields to
1787   convey the full meaning of the response, then the client cannot assume
1788   that meaning has been conveyed; the client might need to repeat the
1789   request in order to determine what action to take next.
1792   A message body that uses the chunked transfer coding is
1793   incomplete if the zero-sized chunk that terminates the encoding has not
1794   been received.  A message that uses a valid <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> is
1795   incomplete if the size of the message body received (in octets) is less than
1796   the value given by Content-Length.  A response that has neither chunked
1797   transfer coding nor Content-Length is terminated by closure of the
1798   connection, and thus is considered complete regardless of the number of
1799   message body octets received, provided that the header block was received
1800   intact.
1804<section title="Message Parsing Robustness" anchor="message.robustness">
1806   Older HTTP/1.0 user agent implementations might send an extra CRLF
1807   after a POST request as a lame workaround for some early server
1808   applications that failed to read message body content that was
1809   not terminated by a line-ending. An HTTP/1.1 user agent &MUST-NOT;
1810   preface or follow a request with an extra CRLF.  If terminating
1811   the request message body with a line-ending is desired, then the
1812   user agent &MUST; count the terminating CRLF octets as part of the
1813   message body length.
1816   In the interest of robustness, servers &SHOULD; ignore at least one
1817   empty line received where a request-line is expected. In other words, if
1818   a server is reading the protocol stream at the beginning of a
1819   message and receives a CRLF first, the server &SHOULD; ignore the CRLF.
1822   Although the line terminator for the start-line and header
1823   fields is the sequence CRLF, recipients &MAY; recognize a
1824   single LF as a line terminator and ignore any preceding CR.
1827   Although the request-line and status-line grammar rules require that each
1828   of the component elements be separated by a single SP octet, recipients
1829   &MAY; instead parse on whitespace-delimited word boundaries and, aside
1830   from the CRLF terminator, treat any form of whitespace as the SP separator
1831   while ignoring preceding or trailing whitespace;
1832   such whitespace includes one or more of the following octets:
1833   SP, HTAB, VT (%x0B), FF (%x0C), or bare CR.
1836   When a server listening only for HTTP request messages, or processing
1837   what appears from the start-line to be an HTTP request message,
1838   receives a sequence of octets that does not match the HTTP-message
1839   grammar aside from the robustness exceptions listed above, the
1840   server &SHOULD; respond with a <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> response. 
1845<section title="Transfer Codings" anchor="transfer.codings">
1846  <x:anchor-alias value="transfer-coding"/>
1847  <x:anchor-alias value="transfer-extension"/>
1849   Transfer coding names are used to indicate an encoding
1850   transformation that has been, can be, or might need to be applied to a
1851   payload body in order to ensure "safe transport" through the network.
1852   This differs from a content coding in that the transfer coding is a
1853   property of the message rather than a property of the representation
1854   that is being transferred.
1856<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="transfer-coding"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="transfer-extension"/>
1857  <x:ref>transfer-coding</x:ref>    = "chunked" ; <xref target="chunked.encoding"/>
1858                     / "compress" ; <xref target="compress.coding"/>
1859                     / "deflate" ; <xref target="deflate.coding"/>
1860                     / "gzip" ; <xref target="gzip.coding"/>
1861                     / <x:ref>transfer-extension</x:ref>
1862  <x:ref>transfer-extension</x:ref> = <x:ref>token</x:ref> *( <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> ";" <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> <x:ref>transfer-parameter</x:ref> )
1864<t anchor="rule.parameter">
1865  <x:anchor-alias value="attribute"/>
1866  <x:anchor-alias value="transfer-parameter"/>
1867  <x:anchor-alias value="value"/>
1868   Parameters are in the form of attribute/value pairs.
1870<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="transfer-parameter"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="attribute"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="value"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="date2"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="date3"/>
1871  <x:ref>transfer-parameter</x:ref> = <x:ref>attribute</x:ref> <x:ref>BWS</x:ref> "=" <x:ref>BWS</x:ref> <x:ref>value</x:ref>
1872  <x:ref>attribute</x:ref>          = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
1873  <x:ref>value</x:ref>              = <x:ref>word</x:ref>
1876   All transfer-coding names are case-insensitive and ought to be registered
1877   within the HTTP Transfer Coding registry, as defined in
1878   <xref target="transfer.coding.registry"/>.
1879   They are used in the <x:ref>TE</x:ref> (<xref target="header.te"/>) and
1880   <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> (<xref target="header.transfer-encoding"/>)
1881   header fields.
1884<section title="Chunked Transfer Coding" anchor="chunked.encoding">
1885  <iref primary="true" item="chunked (Coding Format)"/>
1886  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk"/>
1887  <x:anchor-alias value="chunked-body"/>
1888  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-data"/>
1889  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-ext"/>
1890  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-ext-name"/>
1891  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-ext-val"/>
1892  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-size"/>
1893  <x:anchor-alias value="last-chunk"/>
1894  <x:anchor-alias value="trailer-part"/>
1895  <x:anchor-alias value="quoted-str-nf"/>
1896  <x:anchor-alias value="qdtext-nf"/>
1898   The chunked transfer coding modifies the body of a message in order to
1899   transfer it as a series of chunks, each with its own size indicator,
1900   followed by an &OPTIONAL; trailer containing header fields. This
1901   allows dynamically generated content to be transferred along with the
1902   information necessary for the recipient to verify that it has
1903   received the full message.
1905<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunked-body"><!--terminal production--></iref><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-size"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="last-chunk"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-ext"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-ext-name"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-ext-val"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-data"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="trailer-part"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="quoted-str-nf"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="qdtext-nf"/>
1906  <x:ref>chunked-body</x:ref>   = *<x:ref>chunk</x:ref>
1907                   <x:ref>last-chunk</x:ref>
1908                   <x:ref>trailer-part</x:ref>
1909                   <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1911  <x:ref>chunk</x:ref>          = <x:ref>chunk-size</x:ref> [ <x:ref>chunk-ext</x:ref> ] <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1912                   <x:ref>chunk-data</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1913  <x:ref>chunk-size</x:ref>     = 1*<x:ref>HEXDIG</x:ref>
1914  <x:ref>last-chunk</x:ref>     = 1*("0") [ <x:ref>chunk-ext</x:ref> ] <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1916  <x:ref>chunk-ext</x:ref>      = *( ";" <x:ref>chunk-ext-name</x:ref> [ "=" <x:ref>chunk-ext-val</x:ref> ] )
1917  <x:ref>chunk-ext-name</x:ref> = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
1918  <x:ref>chunk-ext-val</x:ref>  = <x:ref>token</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-str-nf</x:ref>
1919  <x:ref>chunk-data</x:ref>     = 1*<x:ref>OCTET</x:ref> ; a sequence of chunk-size octets
1920  <x:ref>trailer-part</x:ref>   = *( <x:ref>header-field</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref> )
1922  <x:ref>quoted-str-nf</x:ref>  = <x:ref>DQUOTE</x:ref> *( <x:ref>qdtext-nf</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-pair</x:ref> ) <x:ref>DQUOTE</x:ref>
1923                 ; like <x:ref>quoted-string</x:ref>, but disallowing line folding
1924  <x:ref>qdtext-nf</x:ref>      = <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / %x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref>
1927   Chunk extensions within the chunked transfer coding are deprecated.
1928   Senders &SHOULD-NOT; send chunk-ext.
1929   Definition of new chunk extensions is discouraged.
1932   The chunk-size field is a string of hex digits indicating the size of
1933   the chunk-data in octets. The chunked transfer coding is complete when a
1934   chunk with a chunk-size of zero is received, possibly followed by a
1935   trailer, and finally terminated by an empty line.
1938<section title="Trailer" anchor="header.trailer">
1939  <iref primary="true" item="Trailer header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
1940  <x:anchor-alias value="Trailer"/>
1942   A trailer allows the sender to include additional fields at the end of a
1943   chunked message in order to supply metadata that might be dynamically
1944   generated while the message body is sent, such as a message integrity
1945   check, digital signature, or post-processing status.
1946   The trailer &MUST-NOT; contain fields that need to be known before a
1947   recipient processes the body, such as <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref>,
1948   <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref>, and <x:ref>Trailer</x:ref>.
1951   When a message includes a message body encoded with the chunked
1952   transfer coding and the sender desires to send metadata in the form of
1953   trailer fields at the end of the message, the sender &SHOULD; send a
1954   <x:ref>Trailer</x:ref> header field before the message body to indicate
1955   which fields will be present in the trailers. This allows the recipient
1956   to prepare for receipt of that metadata before it starts processing the body,
1957   which is useful if the message is being streamed and the recipient wishes
1958   to confirm an integrity check on the fly.
1960<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Trailer"/>
1961  <x:ref>Trailer</x:ref> = 1#<x:ref>field-name</x:ref>
1964   If no <x:ref>Trailer</x:ref> header field is present, the sender of a
1965   chunked message body &SHOULD; send an empty trailer.
1968   A server &MUST; send an empty trailer with the chunked transfer coding
1969   unless at least one of the following is true:
1970  <list style="numbers">
1971    <t>the request included a <x:ref>TE</x:ref> header field that indicates
1972    "trailers" is acceptable in the transfer coding of the response, as
1973    described in <xref target="header.te"/>; or,</t>
1975    <t>the trailer fields consist entirely of optional metadata and the
1976    recipient could use the message (in a manner acceptable to the server where
1977    the field originated) without receiving that metadata. In other words,
1978    the server that generated the header field is willing to accept the
1979    possibility that the trailer fields might be silently discarded along
1980    the path to the client.</t>
1981  </list>
1984   The above requirement prevents the need for an infinite buffer when a
1985   message is being received by an HTTP/1.1 (or later) proxy and forwarded to
1986   an HTTP/1.0 recipient.
1990<section title="Decoding chunked" anchor="decoding.chunked">
1992   A process for decoding the chunked transfer coding
1993   can be represented in pseudo-code as:
1995<figure><artwork type="code">
1996  length := 0
1997  read chunk-size, chunk-ext (if any) and CRLF
1998  while (chunk-size &gt; 0) {
1999     read chunk-data and CRLF
2000     append chunk-data to decoded-body
2001     length := length + chunk-size
2002     read chunk-size and CRLF
2003  }
2004  read header-field
2005  while (header-field not empty) {
2006     append header-field to existing header fields
2007     read header-field
2008  }
2009  Content-Length := length
2010  Remove "chunked" from Transfer-Encoding
2011  Remove Trailer from existing header fields
2014   All recipients &MUST; be able to receive and decode the
2015   chunked transfer coding and &MUST; ignore chunk-ext extensions
2016   they do not understand.
2021<section title="Compression Codings" anchor="compression.codings">
2023   The codings defined below can be used to compress the payload of a
2024   message.
2027<section title="Compress Coding" anchor="compress.coding">
2028<iref item="compress (Coding Format)"/>
2030   The "compress" format is produced by the common UNIX file compression
2031   program "compress". This format is an adaptive Lempel-Ziv-Welch
2032   coding (LZW). Recipients &SHOULD; consider "x-compress" to be
2033   equivalent to "compress".
2037<section title="Deflate Coding" anchor="deflate.coding">
2038<iref item="deflate (Coding Format)"/>
2040   The "deflate" format is defined as the "deflate" compression mechanism
2041   (described in <xref target="RFC1951"/>) used inside the "zlib"
2042   data format (<xref target="RFC1950"/>).
2045  <t>
2046    &Note; Some incorrect implementations send the "deflate"
2047    compressed data without the zlib wrapper.
2048   </t>
2052<section title="Gzip Coding" anchor="gzip.coding">
2053<iref item="gzip (Coding Format)"/>
2055   The "gzip" format is produced by the file compression program
2056   "gzip" (GNU zip), as described in <xref target="RFC1952"/>. This format is a
2057   Lempel-Ziv coding (LZ77) with a 32 bit CRC.
2058   Recipients &SHOULD; consider "x-gzip" to be equivalent to "gzip".
2064<section title="TE" anchor="header.te">
2065  <iref primary="true" item="TE header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2066  <x:anchor-alias value="TE"/>
2067  <x:anchor-alias value="t-codings"/>
2068  <x:anchor-alias value="t-ranking"/>
2069  <x:anchor-alias value="rank"/>
2071   The "TE" header field in a request indicates what transfer codings,
2072   besides chunked, the client is willing to accept in response, and
2073   whether or not the client is willing to accept trailer fields in a
2074   chunked transfer coding.
2077   The TE field-value consists of a comma-separated list of transfer coding
2078   names, each allowing for optional parameters (as described in
2079   <xref target="transfer.codings"/>), and/or the keyword "trailers".
2080   Clients &MUST-NOT; send the chunked transfer coding name in TE;
2081   chunked is always acceptable for HTTP/1.1 recipients.
2083<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="TE"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="t-codings"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="t-ranking"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="rank"/>
2084  <x:ref>TE</x:ref>        = #<x:ref>t-codings</x:ref>
2085  <x:ref>t-codings</x:ref> = "trailers" / ( <x:ref>transfer-coding</x:ref> [ <x:ref>t-ranking</x:ref> ] )
2086  <x:ref>t-ranking</x:ref> = <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> ";" <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> "q=" <x:ref>rank</x:ref>
2087  <x:ref>rank</x:ref>      = ( "0" [ "." 0*3<x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref> ] )
2088             / ( "1" [ "." 0*3("0") ] )
2091   Three examples of TE use are below.
2093<figure><artwork type="example">
2094  TE: deflate
2095  TE:
2096  TE: trailers, deflate;q=0.5
2099   The presence of the keyword "trailers" indicates that the client is
2100   willing to accept trailer fields in a chunked transfer coding,
2101   as defined in <xref target="chunked.encoding"/>, on behalf of itself and
2102   any downstream clients. For chained requests, this implies that either:
2103   (a) all downstream clients are willing to accept trailer fields in the
2104   forwarded response; or,
2105   (b) the client will attempt to buffer the response on behalf of downstream
2106   recipients.
2107   Note that HTTP/1.1 does not define any means to limit the size of a
2108   chunked response such that a client can be assured of buffering the
2109   entire response.
2112   When multiple transfer codings are acceptable, the client &MAY; rank the
2113   codings by preference using a case-insensitive "q" parameter (similar to
2114   the qvalues used in content negotiation fields, &qvalue;). The rank value
2115   is a real number in the range 0 through 1, where 0.001 is the least
2116   preferred and 1 is the most preferred; a value of 0 means "not acceptable".
2119   If the TE field-value is empty or if no TE field is present, the only
2120   acceptable transfer coding is chunked. A message with no transfer coding
2121   is always acceptable.
2124   Since the TE header field only applies to the immediate connection,
2125   a sender of TE &MUST; also send a "TE" connection option within the
2126   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field (<xref target="header.connection"/>)
2127   in order to prevent the TE field from being forwarded by intermediaries
2128   that do not support its semantics.
2133<section title="Message Routing" anchor="message.routing">
2135   HTTP request message routing is determined by each client based on the
2136   target resource, the client's proxy configuration, and
2137   establishment or reuse of an inbound connection.  The corresponding
2138   response routing follows the same connection chain back to the client.
2141<section title="Identifying a Target Resource" anchor="target-resource">
2142  <iref primary="true" item="target resource"/>
2143  <iref primary="true" item="target URI"/>
2144  <x:anchor-alias value="target resource"/>
2145  <x:anchor-alias value="target URI"/>
2147   HTTP is used in a wide variety of applications, ranging from
2148   general-purpose computers to home appliances.  In some cases,
2149   communication options are hard-coded in a client's configuration.
2150   However, most HTTP clients rely on the same resource identification
2151   mechanism and configuration techniques as general-purpose Web browsers.
2154   HTTP communication is initiated by a user agent for some purpose.
2155   The purpose is a combination of request semantics, which are defined in
2156   <xref target="Part2"/>, and a target resource upon which to apply those
2157   semantics.  A URI reference (<xref target="uri"/>) is typically used as
2158   an identifier for the "<x:dfn>target resource</x:dfn>", which a user agent
2159   would resolve to its absolute form in order to obtain the
2160   "<x:dfn>target URI</x:dfn>".  The target URI
2161   excludes the reference's fragment identifier component, if any,
2162   since fragment identifiers are reserved for client-side processing
2163   (<xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.5"/>).
2167<section title="Connecting Inbound" anchor="connecting.inbound">
2169   Once the target URI is determined, a client needs to decide whether
2170   a network request is necessary to accomplish the desired semantics and,
2171   if so, where that request is to be directed.
2174   If the client has a response cache and the request semantics can be
2175   satisfied by a cache (<xref target="Part6"/>), then the request is
2176   usually directed to the cache first.
2179   If the request is not satisfied by a cache, then a typical client will
2180   check its configuration to determine whether a proxy is to be used to
2181   satisfy the request.  Proxy configuration is implementation-dependent,
2182   but is often based on URI prefix matching, selective authority matching,
2183   or both, and the proxy itself is usually identified by an "http" or
2184   "https" URI.  If a proxy is applicable, the client connects inbound by
2185   establishing (or reusing) a connection to that proxy.
2188   If no proxy is applicable, a typical client will invoke a handler routine,
2189   usually specific to the target URI's scheme, to connect directly
2190   to an authority for the target resource.  How that is accomplished is
2191   dependent on the target URI scheme and defined by its associated
2192   specification, similar to how this specification defines origin server
2193   access for resolution of the "http" (<xref target="http.uri"/>) and
2194   "https" (<xref target="https.uri"/>) schemes.
2197   HTTP requirements regarding connection management are defined in
2198   <xref target=""/>.
2202<section title="Request Target" anchor="request-target">
2204   Once an inbound connection is obtained,
2205   the client sends an HTTP request message (<xref target="http.message"/>)
2206   with a request-target derived from the target URI.
2207   There are four distinct formats for the request-target, depending on both
2208   the method being requested and whether the request is to a proxy.
2210<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="request-target"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="origin-form"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="absolute-form"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="authority-form"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="asterisk-form"/>
2211  <x:ref>request-target</x:ref> = <x:ref>origin-form</x:ref>
2212                 / <x:ref>absolute-form</x:ref>
2213                 / <x:ref>authority-form</x:ref>
2214                 / <x:ref>asterisk-form</x:ref>
2216  <x:ref>origin-form</x:ref>    = <x:ref>path-absolute</x:ref> [ "?" <x:ref>query</x:ref> ]
2217  <x:ref>absolute-form</x:ref>  = <x:ref>absolute-URI</x:ref>
2218  <x:ref>authority-form</x:ref> = <x:ref>authority</x:ref>
2219  <x:ref>asterisk-form</x:ref>  = "*"
2221<t anchor="origin-form"><iref item="origin-form (of request-target)"/>
2222   The most common form of request-target is the origin-form.
2223   When making a request directly to an origin server, other than a CONNECT
2224   or server-wide OPTIONS request (as detailed below),
2225   a client &MUST; send only the absolute path and query components of
2226   the target URI as the request-target.
2227   If the target URI's path component is empty, then the client &MUST; send
2228   "/" as the path within the origin-form of request-target.
2229   A <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header field is also sent, as defined in
2230   <xref target=""/>, containing the target URI's
2231   authority component (excluding any userinfo).
2234   For example, a client wishing to retrieve a representation of the resource
2235   identified as
2237<figure><artwork x:indent-with="  " type="example">
2241   directly from the origin server would open (or reuse) a TCP connection
2242   to port 80 of the host "" and send the lines:
2244<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2245GET /where?q=now HTTP/1.1
2249   followed by the remainder of the request message.
2251<t anchor="absolute-form"><iref item="absolute-form (of request-target)"/>
2252   When making a request to a proxy, other than a CONNECT or server-wide
2253   OPTIONS request (as detailed below), a client &MUST; send the target URI
2254   in absolute-form as the request-target.
2255   The proxy is requested to either service that request from a valid cache,
2256   if possible, or make the same request on the client's behalf to either
2257   the next inbound proxy server or directly to the origin server indicated
2258   by the request-target.  Requirements on such "forwarding" of messages are
2259   defined in <xref target="message.forwarding"/>.
2262   An example absolute-form of request-line would be:
2264<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2265GET HTTP/1.1
2268   To allow for transition to the absolute-form for all requests in some
2269   future version of HTTP, HTTP/1.1 servers &MUST; accept the absolute-form
2270   in requests, even though HTTP/1.1 clients will only send them in requests
2271   to proxies.
2273<t anchor="authority-form"><iref item="authority-form (of request-target)"/>
2274   The authority-form of request-target is only used for CONNECT requests
2275   (&CONNECT;).  When making a CONNECT request to establish a tunnel through
2276   one or more proxies, a client &MUST; send only the target URI's
2277   authority component (excluding any userinfo) as the request-target.
2278   For example,
2280<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2283<t anchor="asterisk-form"><iref item="asterisk-form (of request-target)"/>
2284   The asterisk-form of request-target is only used for a server-wide
2285   OPTIONS request (&OPTIONS;).  When a client wishes to request OPTIONS
2286   for the server as a whole, as opposed to a specific named resource of
2287   that server, the client &MUST; send only "*" (%x2A) as the request-target.
2288   For example,
2290<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2291OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1
2294   If a proxy receives an OPTIONS request with an absolute-form of
2295   request-target in which the URI has an empty path and no query component,
2296   then the last proxy on the request chain &MUST; send a request-target
2297   of "*" when it forwards the request to the indicated origin server.
2300   For example, the request
2301</preamble><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2305  would be forwarded by the final proxy as
2306</preamble><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2307OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1
2311   after connecting to port 8001 of host "".
2316<section title="Host" anchor="">
2317  <iref primary="true" item="Host header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2318  <x:anchor-alias value="Host"/>
2320   The "Host" header field in a request provides the host and port
2321   information from the target URI, enabling the origin
2322   server to distinguish among resources while servicing requests
2323   for multiple host names on a single IP address.  Since the Host
2324   field-value is critical information for handling a request, it
2325   &SHOULD; be sent as the first header field following the request-line.
2327<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Host"/>
2328  <x:ref>Host</x:ref> = <x:ref>uri-host</x:ref> [ ":" <x:ref>port</x:ref> ] ; <xref target="http.uri"/>
2331   A client &MUST; send a Host header field in all HTTP/1.1 request
2332   messages.  If the target URI includes an authority component, then
2333   the Host field-value &MUST; be identical to that authority component
2334   after excluding any userinfo (<xref target="http.uri"/>).
2335   If the authority component is missing or undefined for the target URI,
2336   then the Host header field &MUST; be sent with an empty field-value.
2339   For example, a GET request to the origin server for
2340   &lt;; would begin with:
2342<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2343GET /pub/WWW/ HTTP/1.1
2347   The Host header field &MUST; be sent in an HTTP/1.1 request even
2348   if the request-target is in the absolute-form, since this
2349   allows the Host information to be forwarded through ancient HTTP/1.0
2350   proxies that might not have implemented Host.
2353   When a proxy receives a request with an absolute-form of
2354   request-target, the proxy &MUST; ignore the received
2355   Host header field (if any) and instead replace it with the host
2356   information of the request-target.  If the proxy forwards the request,
2357   it &MUST; generate a new Host field-value based on the received
2358   request-target rather than forward the received Host field-value.
2361   Since the Host header field acts as an application-level routing
2362   mechanism, it is a frequent target for malware seeking to poison
2363   a shared cache or redirect a request to an unintended server.
2364   An interception proxy is particularly vulnerable if it relies on
2365   the Host field-value for redirecting requests to internal
2366   servers, or for use as a cache key in a shared cache, without
2367   first verifying that the intercepted connection is targeting a
2368   valid IP address for that host.
2371   A server &MUST; respond with a <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> status code
2372   to any HTTP/1.1 request message that lacks a Host header field and
2373   to any request message that contains more than one Host header field
2374   or a Host header field with an invalid field-value.
2378<section title="Effective Request URI" anchor="effective.request.uri">
2379  <iref primary="true" item="effective request URI"/>
2381   A server that receives an HTTP request message &MUST; reconstruct
2382   the user agent's original target URI, based on the pieces of information
2383   learned from the request-target, <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header field, and
2384   connection context, in order to identify the intended target resource and
2385   properly service the request. The URI derived from this reconstruction
2386   process is referred to as the "<x:dfn>effective request URI</x:dfn>".
2389   For a user agent, the effective request URI is the target URI.
2392   If the request-target is in absolute-form, then the effective request URI
2393   is the same as the request-target.  Otherwise, the effective request URI
2394   is constructed as follows.
2397   If the request is received over a TLS-secured TCP connection,
2398   then the effective request URI's scheme is "https"; otherwise, the
2399   scheme is "http".
2402   If the request-target is in authority-form, then the effective
2403   request URI's authority component is the same as the request-target.
2404   Otherwise, if a <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header field is supplied with a
2405   non-empty field-value, then the authority component is the same as the
2406   Host field-value. Otherwise, the authority component is the concatenation of
2407   the default host name configured for the server, a colon (":"), and the
2408   connection's incoming TCP port number in decimal form.
2411   If the request-target is in authority-form or asterisk-form, then the
2412   effective request URI's combined path and query component is empty.
2413   Otherwise, the combined path and query component is the same as the
2414   request-target.
2417   The components of the effective request URI, once determined as above,
2418   can be combined into absolute-URI form by concatenating the scheme,
2419   "://", authority, and combined path and query component.
2423   Example 1: the following message received over an insecure TCP connection
2425<artwork type="example" x:indent-with="  ">
2426GET /pub/WWW/TheProject.html HTTP/1.1
2432  has an effective request URI of
2434<artwork type="example" x:indent-with="  ">
2440   Example 2: the following message received over a TLS-secured TCP connection
2442<artwork type="example" x:indent-with="  ">
2443OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1
2449  has an effective request URI of
2451<artwork type="example" x:indent-with="  ">
2456   An origin server that does not allow resources to differ by requested
2457   host &MAY; ignore the <x:ref>Host</x:ref> field-value and instead replace it
2458   with a configured server name when constructing the effective request URI.
2461   Recipients of an HTTP/1.0 request that lacks a <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header
2462   field &MAY; attempt to use heuristics (e.g., examination of the URI path for
2463   something unique to a particular host) in order to guess the
2464   effective request URI's authority component.
2468<section title="Associating a Response to a Request" anchor="">
2470   HTTP does not include a request identifier for associating a given
2471   request message with its corresponding one or more response messages.
2472   Hence, it relies on the order of response arrival to correspond exactly
2473   to the order in which requests are made on the same connection.
2474   More than one response message per request only occurs when one or more
2475   informational responses (<x:ref>1xx</x:ref>, see &status-1xx;) precede a
2476   final response to the same request.
2479   A client that has more than one outstanding request on a connection &MUST;
2480   maintain a list of outstanding requests in the order sent and &MUST;
2481   associate each received response message on that connection to the highest
2482   ordered request that has not yet received a final (non-<x:ref>1xx</x:ref>)
2483   response.
2487<section title="Message Forwarding" anchor="message.forwarding">
2489   As described in <xref target="intermediaries"/>, intermediaries can serve
2490   a variety of roles in the processing of HTTP requests and responses.
2491   Some intermediaries are used to improve performance or availability.
2492   Others are used for access control or to filter content.
2493   Since an HTTP stream has characteristics similar to a pipe-and-filter
2494   architecture, there are no inherent limits to the extent an intermediary
2495   can enhance (or interfere) with either direction of the stream.
2498   Intermediaries that forward a message &MUST; implement the
2499   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field, as specified in
2500   <xref target="header.connection"/>, to exclude fields that are only
2501   intended for the incoming connection.
2504   In order to avoid request loops, a proxy that forwards requests to other
2505   proxies &MUST; be able to recognize and exclude all of its own server
2506   names, including any aliases, local variations, or literal IP addresses.
2509<section title="Via" anchor="header.via">
2510  <iref primary="true" item="Via header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2511  <x:anchor-alias value="pseudonym"/>
2512  <x:anchor-alias value="received-by"/>
2513  <x:anchor-alias value="received-protocol"/>
2514  <x:anchor-alias value="Via"/>
2516   The "Via" header field &MUST; be sent by a proxy or gateway in forwarded
2517   messages to indicate the intermediate protocols and recipients between the
2518   user agent and the server on requests, and between the origin server and
2519   the client on responses. It is analogous to the "Received" field
2520   used by email systems (<xref target="RFC5322" x:fmt="of" x:sec="3.6.7"/>).
2521   Via is used in HTTP for tracking message forwards,
2522   avoiding request loops, and identifying the protocol capabilities of
2523   all senders along the request/response chain.
2525<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Via"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="received-protocol"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="protocol-name"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="protocol-version"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="received-by"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="pseudonym"/>
2526  <x:ref>Via</x:ref>               = 1#( <x:ref>received-protocol</x:ref> <x:ref>RWS</x:ref> <x:ref>received-by</x:ref>
2527                          [ <x:ref>RWS</x:ref> <x:ref>comment</x:ref> ] )
2528  <x:ref>received-protocol</x:ref> = [ <x:ref>protocol-name</x:ref> "/" ] <x:ref>protocol-version</x:ref>
2529                      ; see <xref target="header.upgrade"/>
2530  <x:ref>received-by</x:ref>       = ( <x:ref>uri-host</x:ref> [ ":" <x:ref>port</x:ref> ] ) / <x:ref>pseudonym</x:ref>
2531  <x:ref>pseudonym</x:ref>         = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
2534   The received-protocol indicates the protocol version of the message
2535   received by the server or client along each segment of the
2536   request/response chain. The received-protocol version is appended to
2537   the Via field value when the message is forwarded so that information
2538   about the protocol capabilities of upstream applications remains
2539   visible to all recipients.
2542   The protocol-name is excluded if and only if it would be "HTTP". The
2543   received-by field is normally the host and optional port number of a
2544   recipient server or client that subsequently forwarded the message.
2545   However, if the real host is considered to be sensitive information,
2546   it &MAY; be replaced by a pseudonym. If the port is not given, it &MAY;
2547   be assumed to be the default port of the received-protocol.
2550   Multiple Via field values represent each proxy or gateway that has
2551   forwarded the message. Each recipient &MUST; append its information
2552   such that the end result is ordered according to the sequence of
2553   forwarding applications.
2556   Comments &MAY; be used in the Via header field to identify the software
2557   of each recipient, analogous to the <x:ref>User-Agent</x:ref> and
2558   <x:ref>Server</x:ref> header fields. However, all comments in the Via field
2559   are optional and &MAY; be removed by any recipient prior to forwarding the
2560   message.
2563   For example, a request message could be sent from an HTTP/1.0 user
2564   agent to an internal proxy code-named "fred", which uses HTTP/1.1 to
2565   forward the request to a public proxy at, which completes
2566   the request by forwarding it to the origin server at
2567   The request received by would then have the following
2568   Via header field:
2570<figure><artwork type="example">
2571  Via: 1.0 fred, 1.1 (Apache/1.1)
2574   A proxy or gateway used as a portal through a network firewall
2575   &SHOULD-NOT; forward the names and ports of hosts within the firewall
2576   region unless it is explicitly enabled to do so. If not enabled, the
2577   received-by host of any host behind the firewall &SHOULD; be replaced
2578   by an appropriate pseudonym for that host.
2581   A proxy or gateway &MAY; combine an ordered subsequence of Via header
2582   field entries into a single such entry if the entries have identical
2583   received-protocol values. For example,
2585<figure><artwork type="example">
2586  Via: 1.0 ricky, 1.1 ethel, 1.1 fred, 1.0 lucy
2589  could be collapsed to
2591<figure><artwork type="example">
2592  Via: 1.0 ricky, 1.1 mertz, 1.0 lucy
2595   Senders &SHOULD-NOT; combine multiple entries unless they are all
2596   under the same organizational control and the hosts have already been
2597   replaced by pseudonyms. Senders &MUST-NOT; combine entries which
2598   have different received-protocol values.
2602<section title="Transformations" anchor="message.transformations">
2604   Some intermediaries include features for transforming messages and their
2605   payloads.  A transforming proxy might, for example, convert between image
2606   formats in order to save cache space or to reduce the amount of traffic on
2607   a slow link. However, operational problems might occur when these
2608   transformations are applied to payloads intended for critical applications,
2609   such as medical imaging or scientific data analysis, particularly when
2610   integrity checks or digital signatures are used to ensure that the payload
2611   received is identical to the original.
2614   If a proxy receives a request-target with a host name that is not a
2615   fully qualified domain name, it &MAY; add its own domain to the host name
2616   it received when forwarding the request.  A proxy &MUST-NOT; change the
2617   host name if it is a fully qualified domain name.
2620   A proxy &MUST-NOT; modify the "path-absolute" and "query" parts of the
2621   received request-target when forwarding it to the next inbound server,
2622   except as noted above to replace an empty path with "/" or "*".
2625   A proxy &MUST-NOT; modify header fields that provide information about the
2626   end points of the communication chain, the resource state, or the selected
2627   representation. A proxy &MAY; change the message body through application
2628   or removal of a transfer coding (<xref target="transfer.codings"/>).
2631   A non-transforming proxy &MUST; preserve the message payload (&payload;).
2632   A transforming proxy &MUST; preserve the payload of a message that
2633   contains the no-transform cache-control directive.
2636   A transforming proxy &MAY; transform the payload of a message
2637   that does not contain the no-transform cache-control directive;
2638   if the payload is transformed, the transforming proxy &MUST; add a
2639   Warning 214 (Transformation applied) header field if one does not
2640   already appear in the message (see &header-warning;).
2646<section title="Connection Management" anchor="">
2648   HTTP messaging is independent of the underlying transport or
2649   session-layer connection protocol(s).  HTTP only presumes a reliable
2650   transport with in-order delivery of requests and the corresponding
2651   in-order delivery of responses.  The mapping of HTTP request and
2652   response structures onto the data units of an underlying transport
2653   protocol is outside the scope of this specification.
2656   As described in <xref target="connecting.inbound"/>, the specific
2657   connection protocols to be used for an HTTP interaction are determined by
2658   client configuration and the <x:ref>target URI</x:ref>.
2659   For example, the "http" URI scheme
2660   (<xref target="http.uri"/>) indicates a default connection of TCP
2661   over IP, with a default TCP port of 80, but the client might be
2662   configured to use a proxy via some other connection, port, or protocol.
2665   HTTP implementations are expected to engage in connection management,
2666   which includes maintaining the state of current connections,
2667   establishing a new connection or reusing an existing connection,
2668   processing messages received on a connection, detecting connection
2669   failures, and closing each connection.
2670   Most clients maintain multiple connections in parallel, including
2671   more than one connection per server endpoint.
2672   Most servers are designed to maintain thousands of concurrent connections,
2673   while controlling request queues to enable fair use and detect
2674   denial of service attacks.
2677<section title="Connection" anchor="header.connection">
2678  <iref primary="true" item="Connection header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2679  <iref primary="true" item="close" x:for-anchor=""/>
2680  <x:anchor-alias value="Connection"/>
2681  <x:anchor-alias value="connection-option"/>
2682  <x:anchor-alias value="close"/>
2684   The "Connection" header field allows the sender to indicate desired
2685   control options for the current connection.  In order to avoid confusing
2686   downstream recipients, a proxy or gateway &MUST; remove or replace any
2687   received connection options before forwarding the message.
2690   When a header field aside from Connection is used to supply control
2691   information for or about the current connection, the sender &MUST; list
2692   the corresponding field-name within the "Connection" header field.
2693   A proxy or gateway &MUST; parse a received Connection
2694   header field before a message is forwarded and, for each
2695   connection-option in this field, remove any header field(s) from
2696   the message with the same name as the connection-option, and then
2697   remove the Connection header field itself (or replace it with the
2698   intermediary's own connection options for the forwarded message).
2701   Hence, the Connection header field provides a declarative way of
2702   distinguishing header fields that are only intended for the
2703   immediate recipient ("hop-by-hop") from those fields that are
2704   intended for all recipients on the chain ("end-to-end"), enabling the
2705   message to be self-descriptive and allowing future connection-specific
2706   extensions to be deployed without fear that they will be blindly
2707   forwarded by older intermediaries.
2710   The Connection header field's value has the following grammar:
2712<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Connection"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="connection-option"/>
2713  <x:ref>Connection</x:ref>        = 1#<x:ref>connection-option</x:ref>
2714  <x:ref>connection-option</x:ref> = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
2717   Connection options are case-insensitive.
2720   A sender &MUST-NOT; include field-names in the Connection header
2721   field-value for fields that are defined as expressing constraints
2722   for all recipients in the request or response chain, such as the
2723   Cache-Control header field (&header-cache-control;).
2726   The connection options do not have to correspond to a header field
2727   present in the message, since a connection-specific header field
2728   might not be needed if there are no parameters associated with that
2729   connection option.  Recipients that trigger certain connection
2730   behavior based on the presence of connection options &MUST; do so
2731   based on the presence of the connection-option rather than only the
2732   presence of the optional header field.  In other words, if the
2733   connection option is received as a header field but not indicated
2734   within the Connection field-value, then the recipient &MUST; ignore
2735   the connection-specific header field because it has likely been
2736   forwarded by an intermediary that is only partially conformant.
2739   When defining new connection options, specifications ought to
2740   carefully consider existing deployed header fields and ensure
2741   that the new connection option does not share the same name as
2742   an unrelated header field that might already be deployed.
2743   Defining a new connection option essentially reserves that potential
2744   field-name for carrying additional information related to the
2745   connection option, since it would be unwise for senders to use
2746   that field-name for anything else.
2749   The "<x:dfn>close</x:dfn>" connection option is defined for a
2750   sender to signal that this connection will be closed after completion of
2751   the response. For example,
2753<figure><artwork type="example">
2754  Connection: close
2757   in either the request or the response header fields indicates that
2758   the connection &MUST; be closed after the current request/response
2759   is complete (<xref target="persistent.tear-down"/>).
2762   A client that does not support <x:ref>persistent connections</x:ref> &MUST;
2763   send the "close" connection option in every request message.
2766   A server that does not support <x:ref>persistent connections</x:ref> &MUST;
2767   send the "close" connection option in every response message that
2768   does not have a <x:ref>1xx (Informational)</x:ref> status code.
2772<section title="Establishment" anchor="persistent.establishment">
2774   It is beyond the scope of this specification to describe how connections
2775   are established via various transport or session-layer protocols.
2776   Each connection applies to only one transport link.
2780<section title="Persistence" anchor="persistent.connections">
2781   <x:anchor-alias value="persistent connections"/>
2783   HTTP/1.1 defaults to the use of "<x:dfn>persistent connections</x:dfn>",
2784   which allow multiple requests and responses to be carried over a single
2785   connection. The "<x:ref>close</x:ref>" connection-option is used to signal
2786   that a connection will not persist after the current request/response.
2787   HTTP implementations &SHOULD; support persistent connections.
2790   A recipient determines whether a connection is persistent or not based on
2791   the most recently received message's protocol version and
2792   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field (if any):
2793   <list style="symbols">
2794     <t>If the <x:ref>close</x:ref> connection option is present, the
2795        connection will not persist after the current response; else,</t>
2796     <t>If the received protocol is HTTP/1.1 (or later), the connection will
2797        persist after the current response; else,</t>
2798     <t>If the received protocol is HTTP/1.0, the "keep-alive"
2799        connection option is present, the recipient is not a proxy, and
2800        the recipient wishes to honor the HTTP/1.0 "keep-alive" mechanism,
2801        the connection will persist after the current response; otherwise,</t>
2802     <t>The connection will close after the current response.</t>
2803   </list>
2806   A server &MAY; assume that an HTTP/1.1 client intends to maintain a
2807   persistent connection until a <x:ref>close</x:ref> connection option
2808   is received in a request.
2811   A client &MAY; reuse a persistent connection until it sends or receives
2812   a <x:ref>close</x:ref> connection option or receives an HTTP/1.0 response
2813   without a "keep-alive" connection option.
2816   In order to remain persistent, all messages on a connection &MUST;
2817   have a self-defined message length (i.e., one not defined by closure
2818   of the connection), as described in <xref target="message.body"/>.
2819   A server &MUST; read the entire request message body or close
2820   the connection after sending its response, since otherwise the
2821   remaining data on a persistent connection would be misinterpreted
2822   as the next request.  Likewise,
2823   a client &MUST; read the entire response message body if it intends
2824   to reuse the same connection for a subsequent request.
2827   A proxy server &MUST-NOT; maintain a persistent connection with an
2828   HTTP/1.0 client (see <xref x:sec="19.7.1" x:fmt="of" target="RFC2068"/> for
2829   information and discussion of the problems with the Keep-Alive header field
2830   implemented by many HTTP/1.0 clients).
2833   Clients and servers &SHOULD-NOT; assume that a persistent connection is
2834   maintained for HTTP versions less than 1.1 unless it is explicitly
2835   signaled.
2836   See <xref target="compatibility.with.http.1.0.persistent.connections"/>
2837   for more information on backward compatibility with HTTP/1.0 clients.
2840<section title="Pipelining" anchor="pipelining">
2842   A client that supports persistent connections &MAY; "pipeline" its
2843   requests (i.e., send multiple requests without waiting for each
2844   response). A server &MUST; send its responses to those requests in the
2845   same order that the requests were received.
2848   Clients which assume persistent connections and pipeline immediately
2849   after connection establishment &SHOULD; be prepared to retry their
2850   connection if the first pipelined attempt fails. If a client does
2851   such a retry, it &MUST-NOT; pipeline before it knows the connection is
2852   persistent. Clients &MUST; also be prepared to resend their requests if
2853   the server closes the connection before sending all of the
2854   corresponding responses.
2857   Clients &SHOULD-NOT; pipeline requests using non-idempotent request methods
2858   or non-idempotent sequences of request methods (see &idempotent-methods;).
2859   Otherwise, a premature termination of the transport connection could lead
2860   to indeterminate results. A client wishing to send a non-idempotent
2861   request &SHOULD; wait to send that request until it has received the
2862   response status line for the previous request.
2866<section title="Retrying Requests" anchor="persistent.retrying.requests">
2868   Connections can be closed at any time, with or without intention.
2869   Implementations ought to anticipate the need to recover
2870   from asynchronous close events.
2871   A client &MAY; open a new connection and retransmit an aborted sequence
2872   of requests without user interaction so long as the request sequence is
2873   idempotent (see &idempotent-methods;).
2874   A client &MUST-NOT; automatically retry non-idempotent request sequences,
2875   although user agents &MAY; offer a human operator the choice of retrying
2876   the request(s). Confirmation by
2877   user agent software with semantic understanding of the application
2878   &MAY; substitute for user confirmation. An automatic retry &SHOULD-NOT;
2879   be repeated if a second sequence of requests fails.
2884<section title="Concurrency" anchor="persistent.concurrency">
2886   Clients &SHOULD; limit the number of simultaneous
2887   connections that they maintain to a given server.
2890   Previous revisions of HTTP gave a specific number of connections as a
2891   ceiling, but this was found to be impractical for many applications. As a
2892   result, this specification does not mandate a particular maximum number of
2893   connections, but instead encourages clients to be conservative when opening
2894   multiple connections.
2897   Multiple connections are typically used to avoid the "head-of-line
2898   blocking" problem, wherein a request that takes significant server-side
2899   processing and/or has a large payload blocks subsequent requests on the
2900   same connection. However, each connection consumes server resources.
2901   Furthermore, using multiple connections can cause undesirable side effects
2902   in congested networks.
2905   Note that servers might reject traffic that they deem abusive, including an
2906   excessive number of connections from a client.
2910<section title="Failures and Time-outs" anchor="persistent.failures">
2912   Servers will usually have some time-out value beyond which they will
2913   no longer maintain an inactive connection. Proxy servers might make
2914   this a higher value since it is likely that the client will be making
2915   more connections through the same server. The use of persistent
2916   connections places no requirements on the length (or existence) of
2917   this time-out for either the client or the server.
2920   When a client or server wishes to time-out it &SHOULD; issue a graceful
2921   close on the transport connection. Clients and servers &SHOULD; both
2922   constantly watch for the other side of the transport close, and
2923   respond to it as appropriate. If a client or server does not detect
2924   the other side's close promptly it could cause unnecessary resource
2925   drain on the network.
2928   A client, server, or proxy &MAY; close the transport connection at any
2929   time. For example, a client might have started to send a new request
2930   at the same time that the server has decided to close the "idle"
2931   connection. From the server's point of view, the connection is being
2932   closed while it was idle, but from the client's point of view, a
2933   request is in progress.
2936   Servers &SHOULD; maintain persistent connections and allow the underlying
2937   transport's flow control mechanisms to resolve temporary overloads, rather
2938   than terminate connections with the expectation that clients will retry.
2939   The latter technique can exacerbate network congestion.
2942   A client sending a message body &SHOULD; monitor
2943   the network connection for an error status code while it is transmitting
2944   the request. If the client sees an error status code, it &SHOULD;
2945   immediately cease transmitting the body and close the connection.
2949<section title="Tear-down" anchor="persistent.tear-down">
2950  <iref primary="false" item="Connection header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2951  <iref primary="false" item="close" x:for-anchor=""/>
2953   The <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field
2954   (<xref target="header.connection"/>) provides a "<x:ref>close</x:ref>"
2955   connection option that a sender &SHOULD; send when it wishes to close
2956   the connection after the current request/response pair.
2959   A client that sends a <x:ref>close</x:ref> connection option &MUST-NOT;
2960   send further requests on that connection (after the one containing
2961   <x:ref>close</x:ref>) and &MUST; close the connection after reading the
2962   final response message corresponding to this request.
2965   A server that receives a <x:ref>close</x:ref> connection option &MUST;
2966   initiate a lingering close (see below) of the connection after it sends the
2967   final response to the request that contained <x:ref>close</x:ref>.
2968   The server &SHOULD; include a <x:ref>close</x:ref> connection option
2969   in its final response on that connection. The server &MUST-NOT; process
2970   any further requests received on that connection.
2973   A server that sends a <x:ref>close</x:ref> connection option &MUST;
2974   initiate a lingering close of the connection after it sends the
2975   response containing <x:ref>close</x:ref>. The server &MUST-NOT; process
2976   any further requests received on that connection.
2979   A client that receives a <x:ref>close</x:ref> connection option &MUST;
2980   cease sending requests on that connection and close the connection
2981   after reading the response message containing the close; if additional
2982   pipelined requests had been sent on the connection, the client &SHOULD;
2983   assume that they will not be processed by the server.
2986   If a server performs an immediate close of a TCP connection, there is a
2987   significant risk that the client will not be able to read the last HTTP
2988   response.  If the server receives additional data from the client on a
2989   fully-closed connection, such as another request that was sent by the
2990   client before receiving the server's response, the server's TCP stack will
2991   send a reset packet to the client; unfortunately, the reset packet might
2992   erase the client's unacknowledged input buffers before they can be read
2993   and interpreted by the client's HTTP parser.
2996   To avoid the TCP reset problem, a server can perform a lingering close on a
2997   connection by closing only the write side of the read/write connection
2998   (a half-close) and continuing to read from the connection until the
2999   connection is closed by the client or the server is reasonably certain
3000   that its own TCP stack has received the client's acknowledgement of the
3001   packet(s) containing the server's last response. It is then safe for the
3002   server to fully close the connection.
3005   It is unknown whether the reset problem is exclusive to TCP or might also
3006   be found in other transport connection protocols.
3010<section title="Upgrade" anchor="header.upgrade">
3011  <iref primary="true" item="Upgrade header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
3012  <x:anchor-alias value="Upgrade"/>
3013  <x:anchor-alias value="protocol"/>
3014  <x:anchor-alias value="protocol-name"/>
3015  <x:anchor-alias value="protocol-version"/>
3017   The "Upgrade" header field is intended to provide a simple mechanism
3018   for transitioning from HTTP/1.1 to some other protocol on the same
3019   connection.  A client &MAY; send a list of protocols in the Upgrade
3020   header field of a request to invite the server to switch to one or
3021   more of those protocols before sending the final response.
3022   A server &MUST; send an Upgrade header field in <x:ref>101 (Switching
3023   Protocols)</x:ref> responses to indicate which protocol(s) are being
3024   switched to, and &MUST; send it in <x:ref>426 (Upgrade Required)</x:ref>
3025   responses to indicate acceptable protocols.
3026   A server &MAY; send an Upgrade header field in any other response to
3027   indicate that they might be willing to upgrade to one of the
3028   specified protocols for a future request.
3030<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Upgrade"/>
3031  <x:ref>Upgrade</x:ref>          = 1#<x:ref>protocol</x:ref>
3033  <x:ref>protocol</x:ref>         = <x:ref>protocol-name</x:ref> ["/" <x:ref>protocol-version</x:ref>]
3034  <x:ref>protocol-name</x:ref>    = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
3035  <x:ref>protocol-version</x:ref> = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
3038   For example,
3040<figure><artwork type="example">
3041  Upgrade: HTTP/2.0, SHTTP/1.3, IRC/6.9, RTA/x11
3044   Upgrade eases the difficult transition between incompatible protocols by
3045   allowing the client to initiate a request in the more commonly
3046   supported protocol while indicating to the server that it would like
3047   to use a "better" protocol if available (where "better" is determined
3048   by the server, possibly according to the nature of the request method
3049   or target resource).
3052   Upgrade cannot be used to insist on a protocol change; its acceptance and
3053   use by the server is optional. The capabilities and nature of the
3054   application-level communication after the protocol change is entirely
3055   dependent upon the new protocol chosen, although the first action
3056   after changing the protocol &MUST; be a response to the initial HTTP
3057   request that contained the Upgrade header field.
3060   For example, if the Upgrade header field is received in a GET request
3061   and the server decides to switch protocols, then it &MUST; first respond
3062   with a <x:ref>101 (Switching Protocols)</x:ref> message in HTTP/1.1 and
3063   then immediately follow that with the new protocol's equivalent of a
3064   response to a GET on the target resource.  This allows a connection to be
3065   upgraded to protocols with the same semantics as HTTP without the
3066   latency cost of an additional round-trip.  A server &MUST-NOT; switch
3067   protocols unless the received message semantics can be honored by the new
3068   protocol; an OPTIONS request can be honored by any protocol.
3071   When Upgrade is sent, a sender &MUST; also send a
3072   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field (<xref target="header.connection"/>)
3073   that contains the "upgrade" connection option, in order to prevent Upgrade
3074   from being accidentally forwarded by intermediaries that might not implement
3075   the listed protocols.  A server &MUST; ignore an Upgrade header field that
3076   is received in an HTTP/1.0 request.
3079   The Upgrade header field only applies to switching application-level
3080   protocols on the existing connection; it cannot be used
3081   to switch to a protocol on a different connection. For that purpose, it is
3082   more appropriate to use a <x:ref>3xx (Redirection)</x:ref> response
3083   (&status-3xx;).
3086   This specification only defines the protocol name "HTTP" for use by
3087   the family of Hypertext Transfer Protocols, as defined by the HTTP
3088   version rules of <xref target="http.version"/> and future updates to this
3089   specification. Additional tokens ought to be registered with IANA using the
3090   registration procedure defined in <xref target="upgrade.token.registry"/>.
3095<section title="IANA Considerations" anchor="IANA.considerations">
3097<section title="Header Field Registration" anchor="header.field.registration">
3099   HTTP header fields are registered within the Message Header Field Registry
3100   <xref target="BCP90"/> maintained by IANA at
3101   <eref target=""/>.
3104   This document defines the following HTTP header fields, so their
3105   associated registry entries shall be updated according to the permanent
3106   registrations below:
3108<?BEGININC p1-messaging.iana-headers ?>
3109<!--AUTOGENERATED FROM extract-header-defs.xslt, do not edit manually-->
3110<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true" anchor="iana.header.registration.table">
3111   <ttcol>Header Field Name</ttcol>
3112   <ttcol>Protocol</ttcol>
3113   <ttcol>Status</ttcol>
3114   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3116   <c>Connection</c>
3117   <c>http</c>
3118   <c>standard</c>
3119   <c>
3120      <xref target="header.connection"/>
3121   </c>
3122   <c>Content-Length</c>
3123   <c>http</c>
3124   <c>standard</c>
3125   <c>
3126      <xref target="header.content-length"/>
3127   </c>
3128   <c>Host</c>
3129   <c>http</c>
3130   <c>standard</c>
3131   <c>
3132      <xref target=""/>
3133   </c>
3134   <c>TE</c>
3135   <c>http</c>
3136   <c>standard</c>
3137   <c>
3138      <xref target="header.te"/>
3139   </c>
3140   <c>Trailer</c>
3141   <c>http</c>
3142   <c>standard</c>
3143   <c>
3144      <xref target="header.trailer"/>
3145   </c>
3146   <c>Transfer-Encoding</c>
3147   <c>http</c>
3148   <c>standard</c>
3149   <c>
3150      <xref target="header.transfer-encoding"/>
3151   </c>
3152   <c>Upgrade</c>
3153   <c>http</c>
3154   <c>standard</c>
3155   <c>
3156      <xref target="header.upgrade"/>
3157   </c>
3158   <c>Via</c>
3159   <c>http</c>
3160   <c>standard</c>
3161   <c>
3162      <xref target="header.via"/>
3163   </c>
3166<?ENDINC p1-messaging.iana-headers ?>
3168   Furthermore, the header field-name "Close" shall be registered as
3169   "reserved", since using that name as an HTTP header field might
3170   conflict with the "close" connection option of the "<x:ref>Connection</x:ref>"
3171   header field (<xref target="header.connection"/>).
3173<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true">
3174   <ttcol>Header Field Name</ttcol>
3175   <ttcol>Protocol</ttcol>
3176   <ttcol>Status</ttcol>
3177   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3179   <c>Close</c>
3180   <c>http</c>
3181   <c>reserved</c>
3182   <c>
3183      <xref target="header.field.registration"/>
3184   </c>
3187   The change controller is: "IETF ( - Internet Engineering Task Force".
3191<section title="URI Scheme Registration" anchor="uri.scheme.registration">
3193   IANA maintains the registry of URI Schemes <xref target="BCP115"/> at
3194   <eref target=""/>.
3197   This document defines the following URI schemes, so their
3198   associated registry entries shall be updated according to the permanent
3199   registrations below:
3201<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true">
3202   <ttcol>URI Scheme</ttcol>
3203   <ttcol>Description</ttcol>
3204   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3206   <c>http</c>
3207   <c>Hypertext Transfer Protocol</c>
3208   <c><xref target="http.uri"/></c>
3210   <c>https</c>
3211   <c>Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure</c>
3212   <c><xref target="https.uri"/></c>
3216<section title="Internet Media Type Registration" anchor="">
3218   This document serves as the specification for the Internet media types
3219   "message/http" and "application/http". The following is to be registered with
3220   IANA (see <xref target="BCP13"/>).
3222<section title="Internet Media Type message/http" anchor="">
3223<iref item="Media Type" subitem="message/http" primary="true"/>
3224<iref item="message/http Media Type" primary="true"/>
3226   The message/http type can be used to enclose a single HTTP request or
3227   response message, provided that it obeys the MIME restrictions for all
3228   "message" types regarding line length and encodings.
3231  <list style="hanging" x:indent="12em">
3232    <t hangText="Type name:">
3233      message
3234    </t>
3235    <t hangText="Subtype name:">
3236      http
3237    </t>
3238    <t hangText="Required parameters:">
3239      none
3240    </t>
3241    <t hangText="Optional parameters:">
3242      version, msgtype
3243      <list style="hanging">
3244        <t hangText="version:">
3245          The HTTP-version number of the enclosed message
3246          (e.g., "1.1"). If not present, the version can be
3247          determined from the first line of the body.
3248        </t>
3249        <t hangText="msgtype:">
3250          The message type &mdash; "request" or "response". If not
3251          present, the type can be determined from the first
3252          line of the body.
3253        </t>
3254      </list>
3255    </t>
3256    <t hangText="Encoding considerations:">
3257      only "7bit", "8bit", or "binary" are permitted
3258    </t>
3259    <t hangText="Security considerations:">
3260      none
3261    </t>
3262    <t hangText="Interoperability considerations:">
3263      none
3264    </t>
3265    <t hangText="Published specification:">
3266      This specification (see <xref target=""/>).
3267    </t>
3268    <t hangText="Applications that use this media type:">
3269    </t>
3270    <t hangText="Additional information:">
3271      <list style="hanging">
3272        <t hangText="Magic number(s):">none</t>
3273        <t hangText="File extension(s):">none</t>
3274        <t hangText="Macintosh file type code(s):">none</t>
3275      </list>
3276    </t>
3277    <t hangText="Person and email address to contact for further information:">
3278      See Authors Section.
3279    </t>
3280    <t hangText="Intended usage:">
3281      COMMON
3282    </t>
3283    <t hangText="Restrictions on usage:">
3284      none
3285    </t>
3286    <t hangText="Author/Change controller:">
3287      IESG
3288    </t>
3289  </list>
3292<section title="Internet Media Type application/http" anchor="">
3293<iref item="Media Type" subitem="application/http" primary="true"/>
3294<iref item="application/http Media Type" primary="true"/>
3296   The application/http type can be used to enclose a pipeline of one or more
3297   HTTP request or response messages (not intermixed).
3300  <list style="hanging" x:indent="12em">
3301    <t hangText="Type name:">
3302      application
3303    </t>
3304    <t hangText="Subtype name:">
3305      http
3306    </t>
3307    <t hangText="Required parameters:">
3308      none
3309    </t>
3310    <t hangText="Optional parameters:">
3311      version, msgtype
3312      <list style="hanging">
3313        <t hangText="version:">
3314          The HTTP-version number of the enclosed messages
3315          (e.g., "1.1"). If not present, the version can be
3316          determined from the first line of the body.
3317        </t>
3318        <t hangText="msgtype:">
3319          The message type &mdash; "request" or "response". If not
3320          present, the type can be determined from the first
3321          line of the body.
3322        </t>
3323      </list>
3324    </t>
3325    <t hangText="Encoding considerations:">
3326      HTTP messages enclosed by this type
3327      are in "binary" format; use of an appropriate
3328      Content-Transfer-Encoding is required when
3329      transmitted via E-mail.
3330    </t>
3331    <t hangText="Security considerations:">
3332      none
3333    </t>
3334    <t hangText="Interoperability considerations:">
3335      none
3336    </t>
3337    <t hangText="Published specification:">
3338      This specification (see <xref target=""/>).
3339    </t>
3340    <t hangText="Applications that use this media type:">
3341    </t>
3342    <t hangText="Additional information:">
3343      <list style="hanging">
3344        <t hangText="Magic number(s):">none</t>
3345        <t hangText="File extension(s):">none</t>
3346        <t hangText="Macintosh file type code(s):">none</t>
3347      </list>
3348    </t>
3349    <t hangText="Person and email address to contact for further information:">
3350      See Authors Section.
3351    </t>
3352    <t hangText="Intended usage:">
3353      COMMON
3354    </t>
3355    <t hangText="Restrictions on usage:">
3356      none
3357    </t>
3358    <t hangText="Author/Change controller:">
3359      IESG
3360    </t>
3361  </list>
3366<section title="Transfer Coding Registry" anchor="transfer.coding.registry">
3368   The HTTP Transfer Coding Registry defines the name space for transfer
3369   coding names.
3372   Registrations &MUST; include the following fields:
3373   <list style="symbols">
3374     <t>Name</t>
3375     <t>Description</t>
3376     <t>Pointer to specification text</t>
3377   </list>
3380   Names of transfer codings &MUST-NOT; overlap with names of content codings
3381   (&content-codings;) unless the encoding transformation is identical, as
3382   is the case for the compression codings defined in
3383   <xref target="compression.codings"/>.
3386   Values to be added to this name space require IETF Review (see
3387   <xref target="RFC5226" x:fmt="of" x:sec="4.1"/>), and &MUST;
3388   conform to the purpose of transfer coding defined in this section.
3389   Use of program names for the identification of encoding formats
3390   is not desirable and is discouraged for future encodings.
3393   The registry itself is maintained at
3394   <eref target=""/>.
3398<section title="Transfer Coding Registration" anchor="transfer.coding.registration">
3400   The HTTP Transfer Coding Registry shall be updated with the registrations
3401   below:
3403<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true" anchor="iana.transfer.coding.registration.table">
3404   <ttcol>Name</ttcol>
3405   <ttcol>Description</ttcol>
3406   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3407   <c>chunked</c>
3408   <c>Transfer in a series of chunks</c>
3409   <c>
3410      <xref target="chunked.encoding"/>
3411   </c>
3412   <c>compress</c>
3413   <c>UNIX "compress" program method</c>
3414   <c>
3415      <xref target="compress.coding"/>
3416   </c>
3417   <c>deflate</c>
3418   <c>"deflate" compression mechanism (<xref target="RFC1951"/>) used inside
3419   the "zlib" data format (<xref target="RFC1950"/>)
3420   </c>
3421   <c>
3422      <xref target="deflate.coding"/>
3423   </c>
3424   <c>gzip</c>
3425   <c>Same as GNU zip <xref target="RFC1952"/></c>
3426   <c>
3427      <xref target="gzip.coding"/>
3428   </c>
3432<section title="Upgrade Token Registry" anchor="upgrade.token.registry">
3434   The HTTP Upgrade Token Registry defines the name space for protocol-name
3435   tokens used to identify protocols in the <x:ref>Upgrade</x:ref> header
3436   field. Each registered protocol name is associated with contact information
3437   and an optional set of specifications that details how the connection
3438   will be processed after it has been upgraded.
3441   Registrations happen on a "First Come First Served" basis (see
3442   <xref target="RFC5226" x:sec="4.1" x:fmt="of"/>) and are subject to the
3443   following rules:
3444  <list style="numbers">
3445    <t>A protocol-name token, once registered, stays registered forever.</t>
3446    <t>The registration &MUST; name a responsible party for the
3447       registration.</t>
3448    <t>The registration &MUST; name a point of contact.</t>
3449    <t>The registration &MAY; name a set of specifications associated with
3450       that token. Such specifications need not be publicly available.</t>
3451    <t>The registration &SHOULD; name a set of expected "protocol-version"
3452       tokens associated with that token at the time of registration.</t>
3453    <t>The responsible party &MAY; change the registration at any time.
3454       The IANA will keep a record of all such changes, and make them
3455       available upon request.</t>
3456    <t>The IESG &MAY; reassign responsibility for a protocol token.
3457       This will normally only be used in the case when a
3458       responsible party cannot be contacted.</t>
3459  </list>
3462   This registration procedure for HTTP Upgrade Tokens replaces that
3463   previously defined in <xref target="RFC2817" x:fmt="of" x:sec="7.2"/>.
3467<section title="Upgrade Token Registration" anchor="upgrade.token.registration">
3469   The HTTP Upgrade Token Registry shall be updated with the registration
3470   below:
3472<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true">
3473   <ttcol>Value</ttcol>
3474   <ttcol>Description</ttcol>
3475   <ttcol>Expected Version Tokens</ttcol>
3476   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3478   <c>HTTP</c>
3479   <c>Hypertext Transfer Protocol</c>
3480   <c>any DIGIT.DIGIT (e.g, "2.0")</c>
3481   <c><xref target="http.version"/></c>
3484   The responsible party is: "IETF ( - Internet Engineering Task Force".
3490<section title="Security Considerations" anchor="security.considerations">
3492   This section is meant to inform developers, information providers, and
3493   users of known security concerns relevant to HTTP/1.1 message syntax,
3494   parsing, and routing.
3497<section title="DNS-related Attacks" anchor="dns.related.attacks">
3499   HTTP clients rely heavily on the Domain Name Service (DNS), and are thus
3500   generally prone to security attacks based on the deliberate misassociation
3501   of IP addresses and DNS names not protected by DNSSEC. Clients need to be
3502   cautious in assuming the validity of an IP number/DNS name association unless
3503   the response is protected by DNSSEC (<xref target="RFC4033"/>).
3507<section title="Intermediaries and Caching" anchor="attack.intermediaries">
3509   By their very nature, HTTP intermediaries are men-in-the-middle, and
3510   represent an opportunity for man-in-the-middle attacks. Compromise of
3511   the systems on which the intermediaries run can result in serious security
3512   and privacy problems. Intermediaries have access to security-related
3513   information, personal information about individual users and
3514   organizations, and proprietary information belonging to users and
3515   content providers. A compromised intermediary, or an intermediary
3516   implemented or configured without regard to security and privacy
3517   considerations, might be used in the commission of a wide range of
3518   potential attacks.
3521   Intermediaries that contain a shared cache are especially vulnerable
3522   to cache poisoning attacks.
3525   Implementers need to consider the privacy and security
3526   implications of their design and coding decisions, and of the
3527   configuration options they provide to operators (especially the
3528   default configuration).
3531   Users need to be aware that intermediaries are no more trustworthy than
3532   the people who run them; HTTP itself cannot solve this problem.
3536<section title="Buffer Overflows" anchor="attack.protocol.element.size.overflows">
3538   Because HTTP uses mostly textual, character-delimited fields, attackers can
3539   overflow buffers in implementations, and/or perform a Denial of Service
3540   against implementations that accept fields with unlimited lengths.
3543   To promote interoperability, this specification makes specific
3544   recommendations for minimum size limits on request-line
3545   (<xref target="request.line"/>)
3546   and blocks of header fields (<xref target="header.fields"/>). These are
3547   minimum recommendations, chosen to be supportable even by implementations
3548   with limited resources; it is expected that most implementations will
3549   choose substantially higher limits.
3552   This specification also provides a way for servers to reject messages that
3553   have request-targets that are too long (&status-414;) or request entities
3554   that are too large (&status-4xx;).
3557   Recipients &SHOULD; carefully limit the extent to which they read other
3558   fields, including (but not limited to) request methods, response status
3559   phrases, header field-names, and body chunks, so as to avoid denial of
3560   service attacks without impeding interoperability.
3564<section title="Message Integrity" anchor="message.integrity">
3566   HTTP does not define a specific mechanism for ensuring message integrity,
3567   instead relying on the error-detection ability of underlying transport
3568   protocols and the use of length or chunk-delimited framing to detect
3569   completeness. Additional integrity mechanisms, such as hash functions or
3570   digital signatures applied to the content, can be selectively added to
3571   messages via extensible metadata header fields. Historically, the lack of
3572   a single integrity mechanism has been justified by the informal nature of
3573   most HTTP communication.  However, the prevalence of HTTP as an information
3574   access mechanism has resulted in its increasing use within environments
3575   where verification of message integrity is crucial.
3578   User agents are encouraged to implement configurable means for detecting
3579   and reporting failures of message integrity such that those means can be
3580   enabled within environments for which integrity is necessary. For example,
3581   a browser being used to view medical history or drug interaction
3582   information needs to indicate to the user when such information is detected
3583   by the protocol to be incomplete, expired, or corrupted during transfer.
3584   Such mechanisms might be selectively enabled via user agent extensions or
3585   the presence of message integrity metadata in a response.
3586   At a minimum, user agents ought to provide some indication that allows a
3587   user to distinguish between a complete and incomplete response message
3588   (<xref target="incomplete.messages"/>) when such verification is desired.
3592<section title="Server Log Information" anchor="abuse.of.server.log.information">
3594   A server is in the position to save personal data about a user's requests
3595   over time, which might identify their reading patterns or subjects of
3596   interest.  In particular, log information gathered at an intermediary
3597   often contains a history of user agent interaction, across a multitude
3598   of sites, that can be traced to individual users.
3601   HTTP log information is confidential in nature; its handling is often
3602   constrained by laws and regulations.  Log information needs to be securely
3603   stored and appropriate guidelines followed for its analysis.
3604   Anonymization of personal information within individual entries helps,
3605   but is generally not sufficient to prevent real log traces from being
3606   re-identified based on correlation with other access characteristics.
3607   As such, access traces that are keyed to a specific client should not
3608   be published even if the key is pseudonymous.
3611   To minimize the risk of theft or accidental publication, log information
3612   should be purged of personally identifiable information, including
3613   user identifiers, IP addresses, and user-provided query parameters,
3614   as soon as that information is no longer necessary to support operational
3615   needs for security, auditing, or fraud control.
3620<section title="Acknowledgments" anchor="acks">
3622   This edition of HTTP/1.1 builds on the many contributions that went into
3623   <xref target="RFC1945" format="none">RFC 1945</xref>,
3624   <xref target="RFC2068" format="none">RFC 2068</xref>,
3625   <xref target="RFC2145" format="none">RFC 2145</xref>, and
3626   <xref target="RFC2616" format="none">RFC 2616</xref>, including
3627   substantial contributions made by the previous authors, editors, and
3628   working group chairs: Tim Berners-Lee, Ari Luotonen, Roy T. Fielding,
3629   Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, Jim Gettys, Jeffrey C. Mogul, Larry Masinter,
3630   and Paul J. Leach. Mark Nottingham oversaw this effort as working group chair.
3633   Since 1999, the following contributors have helped improve the HTTP
3634   specification by reporting bugs, asking smart questions, drafting or
3635   reviewing text, and evaluating open issues:
3637<?BEGININC acks ?>
3638<t>Adam Barth,
3639Adam Roach,
3640Addison Phillips,
3641Adrian Chadd,
3642Adrien W. de Croy,
3643Alan Ford,
3644Alan Ruttenberg,
3645Albert Lunde,
3646Alek Storm,
3647Alex Rousskov,
3648Alexandre Morgaut,
3649Alexey Melnikov,
3650Alisha Smith,
3651Amichai Rothman,
3652Amit Klein,
3653Amos Jeffries,
3654Andreas Maier,
3655Andreas Petersson,
3656Anil Sharma,
3657Anne van Kesteren,
3658Anthony Bryan,
3659Asbjorn Ulsberg,
3660Ashok Kumar,
3661Balachander Krishnamurthy,
3662Barry Leiba,
3663Ben Laurie,
3664Benjamin Niven-Jenkins,
3665Bil Corry,
3666Bill Burke,
3667Bjoern Hoehrmann,
3668Bob Scheifler,
3669Boris Zbarsky,
3670Brett Slatkin,
3671Brian Kell,
3672Brian McBarron,
3673Brian Pane,
3674Brian Smith,
3675Bryce Nesbitt,
3676Cameron Heavon-Jones,
3677Carl Kugler,
3678Carsten Bormann,
3679Charles Fry,
3680Chris Newman,
3681Cyrus Daboo,
3682Dale Robert Anderson,
3683Dan Wing,
3684Dan Winship,
3685Daniel Stenberg,
3686Darrel Miller,
3687Dave Cridland,
3688Dave Crocker,
3689Dave Kristol,
3690David Booth,
3691David Singer,
3692David W. Morris,
3693Diwakar Shetty,
3694Dmitry Kurochkin,
3695Drummond Reed,
3696Duane Wessels,
3697Edward Lee,
3698Eliot Lear,
3699Eran Hammer-Lahav,
3700Eric D. Williams,
3701Eric J. Bowman,
3702Eric Lawrence,
3703Eric Rescorla,
3704Erik Aronesty,
3705Evan Prodromou,
3706Florian Weimer,
3707Frank Ellermann,
3708Fred Bohle,
3709Gabriel Montenegro,
3710Geoffrey Sneddon,
3711Gervase Markham,
3712Grahame Grieve,
3713Greg Wilkins,
3714Harald Tveit Alvestrand,
3715Harry Halpin,
3716Helge Hess,
3717Henrik Nordstrom,
3718Henry S. Thompson,
3719Henry Story,
3720Herbert van de Sompel,
3721Howard Melman,
3722Hugo Haas,
3723Ian Fette,
3724Ian Hickson,
3725Ido Safruti,
3726Ilya Grigorik,
3727Ingo Struck,
3728J. Ross Nicoll,
3729James H. Manger,
3730James Lacey,
3731James M. Snell,
3732Jamie Lokier,
3733Jan Algermissen,
3734Jeff Hodges (who came up with the term 'effective Request-URI'),
3735Jeff Walden,
3736Jim Luther,
3737Joe D. Williams,
3738Joe Gregorio,
3739Joe Orton,
3740John C. Klensin,
3741John C. Mallery,
3742John Cowan,
3743John Kemp,
3744John Panzer,
3745John Schneider,
3746John Stracke,
3747John Sullivan,
3748Jonas Sicking,
3749Jonathan Billington,
3750Jonathan Moore,
3751Jonathan Rees,
3752Jonathan Silvera,
3753Jordi Ros,
3754Joris Dobbelsteen,
3755Josh Cohen,
3756Julien Pierre,
3757Jungshik Shin,
3758Justin Chapweske,
3759Justin Erenkrantz,
3760Justin James,
3761Kalvinder Singh,
3762Karl Dubost,
3763Keith Hoffman,
3764Keith Moore,
3765Ken Murchison,
3766Koen Holtman,
3767Konstantin Voronkov,
3768Kris Zyp,
3769Lisa Dusseault,
3770Maciej Stachowiak,
3771Marc Schneider,
3772Marc Slemko,
3773Mark Baker,
3774Mark Pauley,
3775Mark Watson,
3776Markus Isomaki,
3777Markus Lanthaler,
3778Martin J. Duerst,
3779Martin Musatov,
3780Martin Nilsson,
3781Martin Thomson,
3782Matt Lynch,
3783Matthew Cox,
3784Max Clark,
3785Michael Burrows,
3786Michael Hausenblas,
3787Mike Amundsen,
3788Mike Belshe,
3789Mike Kelly,
3790Mike Schinkel,
3791Miles Sabin,
3792Murray S. Kucherawy,
3793Mykyta Yevstifeyev,
3794Nathan Rixham,
3795Nicholas Shanks,
3796Nico Williams,
3797Nicolas Alvarez,
3798Nicolas Mailhot,
3799Noah Slater,
3800Pablo Castro,
3801Pat Hayes,
3802Patrick R. McManus,
3803Paul E. Jones,
3804Paul Hoffman,
3805Paul Marquess,
3806Peter Lepeska,
3807Peter Saint-Andre,
3808Peter Watkins,
3809Phil Archer,
3810Philippe Mougin,
3811Phillip Hallam-Baker,
3812Poul-Henning Kamp,
3813Preethi Natarajan,
3814Rajeev Bector,
3815Ray Polk,
3816Reto Bachmann-Gmuer,
3817Richard Cyganiak,
3818Robert Brewer,
3819Robert Collins,
3820Robert O'Callahan,
3821Robert Olofsson,
3822Robert Sayre,
3823Robert Siemer,
3824Robert de Wilde,
3825Roberto Javier Godoy,
3826Roberto Peon,
3827Roland Zink,
3828Ronny Widjaja,
3829S. Mike Dierken,
3830Salvatore Loreto,
3831Sam Johnston,
3832Sam Ruby,
3833Scott Lawrence (who maintained the original issues list),
3834Sean B. Palmer,
3835Shane McCarron,
3836Stefan Eissing,
3837Stefan Tilkov,
3838Stefanos Harhalakis,
3839Stephane Bortzmeyer,
3840Stephen Farrell,
3841Stephen Ludin,
3842Stuart Williams,
3843Subbu Allamaraju,
3844Sylvain Hellegouarch,
3845Tapan Divekar,
3846Tatsuya Hayashi,
3847Ted Hardie,
3848Thomas Broyer,
3849Thomas Fossati,
3850Thomas Nordin,
3851Thomas Roessler,
3852Tim Bray,
3853Tim Morgan,
3854Tim Olsen,
3855Tom Zhou,
3856Travis Snoozy,
3857Tyler Close,
3858Vincent Murphy,
3859Wenbo Zhu,
3860Werner Baumann,
3861Wilbur Streett,
3862Wilfredo Sanchez Vega,
3863William A. Rowe Jr.,
3864William Chan,
3865Willy Tarreau,
3866Xiaoshu Wang,
3867Yaron Goland,
3868Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen,
3869Yoav Nir,
3870Yogesh Bang,
3871Yutaka Oiwa,
3872Yves Lafon (long-time member of the editor team),
3873Zed A. Shaw, and
3874Zhong Yu.
3876<?ENDINC acks ?>
3878   See <xref target="RFC2616" x:fmt="of" x:sec="16"/> for additional
3879   acknowledgements from prior revisions.
3886<references title="Normative References">
3888<reference anchor="Part2">
3889  <front>
3890    <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content</title>
3891    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
3892      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
3893      <address><email></email></address>
3894    </author>
3895    <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
3896      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
3897      <address><email></email></address>
3898    </author>
3899    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
3900  </front>
3901  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-&ID-VERSION;"/>
3902  <x:source href="p2-semantics.xml" basename="p2-semantics">
3903    <x:defines>1xx (Informational)</x:defines>
3904    <x:defines>1xx</x:defines>
3905    <x:defines>100 (Continue)</x:defines>
3906    <x:defines>101 (Switching Protocols)</x:defines>
3907    <x:defines>2xx (Successful)</x:defines>
3908    <x:defines>2xx</x:defines>
3909    <x:defines>200 (OK)</x:defines>
3910    <x:defines>204 (No Content)</x:defines>
3911    <x:defines>3xx (Redirection)</x:defines>
3912    <x:defines>3xx</x:defines>
3913    <x:defines>301 (Moved Permanently)</x:defines>
3914    <x:defines>4xx (Client Error)</x:defines>
3915    <x:defines>4xx</x:defines>
3916    <x:defines>400 (Bad Request)</x:defines>
3917    <x:defines>405 (Method Not Allowed)</x:defines>
3918    <x:defines>411 (Length Required)</x:defines>
3919    <x:defines>414 (URI Too Long)</x:defines>
3920    <x:defines>417 (Expectation Failed)</x:defines>
3921    <x:defines>426 (Upgrade Required)</x:defines>
3922    <x:defines>501 (Not Implemented)</x:defines>
3923    <x:defines>502 (Bad Gateway)</x:defines>
3924    <x:defines>505 (HTTP Version Not Supported)</x:defines>
3925    <x:defines>Allow</x:defines>
3926    <x:defines>Content-Encoding</x:defines>
3927    <x:defines>Content-Location</x:defines>
3928    <x:defines>Content-Type</x:defines>
3929    <x:defines>Date</x:defines>
3930    <x:defines>Expect</x:defines>
3931    <x:defines>Location</x:defines>
3932    <x:defines>Server</x:defines>
3933    <x:defines>User-Agent</x:defines>
3934  </x:source>
3937<reference anchor="Part4">
3938  <front>
3939    <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests</title>
3940    <author fullname="Roy T. Fielding" initials="R." role="editor" surname="Fielding">
3941      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
3942      <address><email></email></address>
3943    </author>
3944    <author fullname="Julian F. Reschke" initials="J. F." role="editor" surname="Reschke">
3945      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
3946      <address><email></email></address>
3947    </author>
3948    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;" />
3949  </front>
3950  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-&ID-VERSION;" />
3951  <x:source basename="p4-conditional" href="p4-conditional.xml">
3952    <x:defines>304 (Not Modified)</x:defines>
3953    <x:defines>ETag</x:defines>
3954    <x:defines>Last-Modified</x:defines>
3955  </x:source>
3958<reference anchor="Part5">
3959  <front>
3960    <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests</title>
3961    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
3962      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
3963      <address><email></email></address>
3964    </author>
3965    <author initials="Y." surname="Lafon" fullname="Yves Lafon" role="editor">
3966      <organization abbrev="W3C">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
3967      <address><email></email></address>
3968    </author>
3969    <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
3970      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
3971      <address><email></email></address>
3972    </author>
3973    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
3974  </front>
3975  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-&ID-VERSION;"/>
3976  <x:source href="p5-range.xml" basename="p5-range">
3977    <x:defines>Content-Range</x:defines>
3978  </x:source>
3981<reference anchor="Part6">
3982  <front>
3983    <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching</title>
3984    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
3985      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
3986      <address><email></email></address>
3987    </author>
3988    <author initials="M." surname="Nottingham" fullname="Mark Nottingham" role="editor">
3989      <organization>Akamai</organization>
3990      <address><email></email></address>
3991    </author>
3992    <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
3993      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
3994      <address><email></email></address>
3995    </author>
3996    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
3997  </front>
3998  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-&ID-VERSION;"/>
3999  <x:source href="p6-cache.xml" basename="p6-cache">
4000    <x:defines>Expires</x:defines>
4001  </x:source>
4004<reference anchor="Part7">
4005  <front>
4006    <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Authentication</title>
4007    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
4008      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
4009      <address><email></email></address>
4010    </author>
4011    <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
4012      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
4013      <address><email></email></address>
4014    </author>
4015    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
4016  </front>
4017  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-&ID-VERSION;"/>
4018  <x:source href="p7-auth.xml" basename="p7-auth">
4019    <x:defines>Proxy-Authenticate</x:defines>
4020    <x:defines>Proxy-Authorization</x:defines>
4021  </x:source>
4024<reference anchor="RFC5234">
4025  <front>
4026    <title abbrev="ABNF for Syntax Specifications">Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF</title>
4027    <author initials="D." surname="Crocker" fullname="Dave Crocker" role="editor">
4028      <organization>Brandenburg InternetWorking</organization>
4029      <address>
4030        <email></email>
4031      </address> 
4032    </author>
4033    <author initials="P." surname="Overell" fullname="Paul Overell">
4034      <organization>THUS plc.</organization>
4035      <address>
4036        <email></email>
4037      </address>
4038    </author>
4039    <date month="January" year="2008"/>
4040  </front>
4041  <seriesInfo name="STD" value="68"/>
4042  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5234"/>
4045<reference anchor="RFC2119">
4046  <front>
4047    <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
4048    <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
4049      <organization>Harvard University</organization>
4050      <address><email></email></address>
4051    </author>
4052    <date month="March" year="1997"/>
4053  </front>
4054  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
4055  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
4058<reference anchor="RFC3986">
4059 <front>
4060  <title abbrev='URI Generic Syntax'>Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax</title>
4061  <author initials='T.' surname='Berners-Lee' fullname='Tim Berners-Lee'>
4062    <organization abbrev="W3C/MIT">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
4063    <address>
4064       <email></email>
4065       <uri></uri>
4066    </address>
4067  </author>
4068  <author initials='R.' surname='Fielding' fullname='Roy T. Fielding'>
4069    <organization abbrev="Day Software">Day Software</organization>
4070    <address>
4071      <email></email>
4072      <uri></uri>
4073    </address>
4074  </author>
4075  <author initials='L.' surname='Masinter' fullname='Larry Masinter'>
4076    <organization abbrev="Adobe Systems">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
4077    <address>
4078      <email></email>
4079      <uri></uri>
4080    </address>
4081  </author>
4082  <date month='January' year='2005'></date>
4083 </front>
4084 <seriesInfo name="STD" value="66"/>
4085 <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3986"/>
4088<reference anchor="USASCII">
4089  <front>
4090    <title>Coded Character Set -- 7-bit American Standard Code for Information Interchange</title>
4091    <author>
4092      <organization>American National Standards Institute</organization>
4093    </author>
4094    <date year="1986"/>
4095  </front>
4096  <seriesInfo name="ANSI" value="X3.4"/>
4099<reference anchor="RFC1950">
4100  <front>
4101    <title>ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3</title>
4102    <author initials="L.P." surname="Deutsch" fullname="L. Peter Deutsch">
4103      <organization>Aladdin Enterprises</organization>
4104      <address><email></email></address>
4105    </author>
4106    <author initials="J-L." surname="Gailly" fullname="Jean-Loup Gailly"/>
4107    <date month="May" year="1996"/>
4108  </front>
4109  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1950"/>
4110  <!--<annotation>
4111    RFC 1950 is an Informational RFC, thus it might be less stable than
4112    this specification. On the other hand, this downward reference was
4113    present since the publication of <xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="none">RFC 2068</xref> in 1997,
4114    therefore it is unlikely to cause problems in practice. See also
4115    <xref target="BCP97"/>.
4116  </annotation>-->
4119<reference anchor="RFC1951">
4120  <front>
4121    <title>DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3</title>
4122    <author initials="P." surname="Deutsch" fullname="L. Peter Deutsch">
4123      <organization>Aladdin Enterprises</organization>
4124      <address><email></email></address>
4125    </author>
4126    <date month="May" year="1996"/>
4127  </front>
4128  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1951"/>
4129  <!--<annotation>
4130    RFC 1951 is an Informational RFC, thus it might be less stable than
4131    this specification. On the other hand, this downward reference was
4132    present since the publication of <xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="none">RFC 2068</xref> in 1997,
4133    therefore it is unlikely to cause problems in practice. See also
4134    <xref target="BCP97"/>.
4135  </annotation>-->
4138<reference anchor="RFC1952">
4139  <front>
4140    <title>GZIP file format specification version 4.3</title>
4141    <author initials="P." surname="Deutsch" fullname="L. Peter Deutsch">
4142      <organization>Aladdin Enterprises</organization>
4143      <address><email></email></address>
4144    </author>
4145    <author initials="J-L." surname="Gailly" fullname="Jean-Loup Gailly">
4146      <address><email></email></address>
4147    </author>
4148    <author initials="M." surname="Adler" fullname="Mark Adler">
4149      <address><email></email></address>
4150    </author>
4151    <author initials="L.P." surname="Deutsch" fullname="L. Peter Deutsch">
4152      <address><email></email></address>
4153    </author>
4154    <author initials="G." surname="Randers-Pehrson" fullname="Glenn Randers-Pehrson">
4155      <address><email></email></address>
4156    </author>
4157    <date month="May" year="1996"/>
4158  </front>
4159  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1952"/>
4160  <!--<annotation>
4161    RFC 1952 is an Informational RFC, thus it might be less stable than
4162    this specification. On the other hand, this downward reference was
4163    present since the publication of <xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="none">RFC 2068</xref> in 1997,
4164    therefore it is unlikely to cause problems in practice. See also
4165    <xref target="BCP97"/>.
4166  </annotation>-->
4171<references title="Informative References">
4173<reference anchor="ISO-8859-1">
4174  <front>
4175    <title>
4176     Information technology -- 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets -- Part 1: Latin alphabet No. 1
4177    </title>
4178    <author>
4179      <organization>International Organization for Standardization</organization>
4180    </author>
4181    <date year="1998"/>
4182  </front>
4183  <seriesInfo name="ISO/IEC" value="8859-1:1998"/>
4186<reference anchor='RFC1919'>
4187  <front>
4188    <title>Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies</title>
4189    <author initials='M.' surname='Chatel' fullname='Marc Chatel'>
4190      <address><email></email></address>
4191    </author>
4192    <date year='1996' month='March' />
4193  </front>
4194  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='1919' />
4197<reference anchor="RFC1945">
4198  <front>
4199    <title abbrev="HTTP/1.0">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0</title>
4200    <author initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee" fullname="Tim Berners-Lee">
4201      <organization>MIT, Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4202      <address><email></email></address>
4203    </author>
4204    <author initials="R.T." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding">
4205      <organization>University of California, Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science</organization>
4206      <address><email></email></address>
4207    </author>
4208    <author initials="H.F." surname="Nielsen" fullname="Henrik Frystyk Nielsen">
4209      <organization>W3 Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4210      <address><email></email></address>
4211    </author>
4212    <date month="May" year="1996"/>
4213  </front>
4214  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1945"/>
4217<reference anchor="RFC2045">
4218  <front>
4219    <title abbrev="Internet Message Bodies">Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies</title>
4220    <author initials="N." surname="Freed" fullname="Ned Freed">
4221      <organization>Innosoft International, Inc.</organization>
4222      <address><email></email></address>
4223    </author>
4224    <author initials="N.S." surname="Borenstein" fullname="Nathaniel S. Borenstein">
4225      <organization>First Virtual Holdings</organization>
4226      <address><email></email></address>
4227    </author>
4228    <date month="November" year="1996"/>
4229  </front>
4230  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2045"/>
4233<reference anchor="RFC2047">
4234  <front>
4235    <title abbrev="Message Header Extensions">MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text</title>
4236    <author initials="K." surname="Moore" fullname="Keith Moore">
4237      <organization>University of Tennessee</organization>
4238      <address><email></email></address>
4239    </author>
4240    <date month="November" year="1996"/>
4241  </front>
4242  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2047"/>
4245<reference anchor="RFC2068">
4246  <front>
4247    <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</title>
4248    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding">
4249      <organization>University of California, Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science</organization>
4250      <address><email></email></address>
4251    </author>
4252    <author initials="J." surname="Gettys" fullname="Jim Gettys">
4253      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4254      <address><email></email></address>
4255    </author>
4256    <author initials="J." surname="Mogul" fullname="Jeffrey C. Mogul">
4257      <organization>Digital Equipment Corporation, Western Research Laboratory</organization>
4258      <address><email></email></address>
4259    </author>
4260    <author initials="H." surname="Nielsen" fullname="Henrik Frystyk Nielsen">
4261      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4262      <address><email></email></address>
4263    </author>
4264    <author initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee" fullname="Tim Berners-Lee">
4265      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4266      <address><email></email></address>
4267    </author>
4268    <date month="January" year="1997"/>
4269  </front>
4270  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2068"/>
4273<reference anchor="RFC2145">
4274  <front>
4275    <title abbrev="HTTP Version Numbers">Use and Interpretation of HTTP Version Numbers</title>
4276    <author initials="J.C." surname="Mogul" fullname="Jeffrey C. Mogul">
4277      <organization>Western Research Laboratory</organization>
4278      <address><email></email></address>
4279    </author>
4280    <author initials="R.T." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding">
4281      <organization>Department of Information and Computer Science</organization>
4282      <address><email></email></address>
4283    </author>
4284    <author initials="J." surname="Gettys" fullname="Jim Gettys">
4285      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4286      <address><email></email></address>
4287    </author>
4288    <author initials="H.F." surname="Nielsen" fullname="Henrik Frystyk Nielsen">
4289      <organization>W3 Consortium</organization>
4290      <address><email></email></address>
4291    </author>
4292    <date month="May" year="1997"/>
4293  </front>
4294  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2145"/>
4297<reference anchor="RFC2616">
4298  <front>
4299    <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</title>
4300    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="R. Fielding">
4301      <organization>University of California, Irvine</organization>
4302      <address><email></email></address>
4303    </author>
4304    <author initials="J." surname="Gettys" fullname="J. Gettys">
4305      <organization>W3C</organization>
4306      <address><email></email></address>
4307    </author>
4308    <author initials="J." surname="Mogul" fullname="J. Mogul">
4309      <organization>Compaq Computer Corporation</organization>
4310      <address><email></email></address>
4311    </author>
4312    <author initials="H." surname="Frystyk" fullname="H. Frystyk">
4313      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4314      <address><email></email></address>
4315    </author>
4316    <author initials="L." surname="Masinter" fullname="L. Masinter">
4317      <organization>Xerox Corporation</organization>
4318      <address><email></email></address>
4319    </author>
4320    <author initials="P." surname="Leach" fullname="P. Leach">
4321      <organization>Microsoft Corporation</organization>
4322      <address><email></email></address>
4323    </author>
4324    <author initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee" fullname="T. Berners-Lee">
4325      <organization>W3C</organization>
4326      <address><email></email></address>
4327    </author>
4328    <date month="June" year="1999"/>
4329  </front>
4330  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2616"/>
4333<reference anchor='RFC2817'>
4334  <front>
4335    <title>Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1</title>
4336    <author initials='R.' surname='Khare' fullname='R. Khare'>
4337      <organization>4K Associates / UC Irvine</organization>
4338      <address><email></email></address>
4339    </author>
4340    <author initials='S.' surname='Lawrence' fullname='S. Lawrence'>
4341      <organization>Agranat Systems, Inc.</organization>
4342      <address><email></email></address>
4343    </author>
4344    <date year='2000' month='May' />
4345  </front>
4346  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='2817' />
4349<reference anchor='RFC2818'>
4350  <front>
4351    <title>HTTP Over TLS</title>
4352    <author initials='E.' surname='Rescorla' fullname='Eric Rescorla'>
4353      <organization>RTFM, Inc.</organization>
4354      <address><email></email></address>
4355    </author>
4356    <date year='2000' month='May' />
4357  </front>
4358  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='2818' />
4361<reference anchor='RFC3040'>
4362  <front>
4363    <title>Internet Web Replication and Caching Taxonomy</title>
4364    <author initials='I.' surname='Cooper' fullname='I. Cooper'>
4365      <organization>Equinix, Inc.</organization>
4366    </author>
4367    <author initials='I.' surname='Melve' fullname='I. Melve'>
4368      <organization>UNINETT</organization>
4369    </author>
4370    <author initials='G.' surname='Tomlinson' fullname='G. Tomlinson'>
4371      <organization>CacheFlow Inc.</organization>
4372    </author>
4373    <date year='2001' month='January' />
4374  </front>
4375  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='3040' />
4378<reference anchor='BCP90'>
4379  <front>
4380    <title>Registration Procedures for Message Header Fields</title>
4381    <author initials='G.' surname='Klyne' fullname='G. Klyne'>
4382      <organization>Nine by Nine</organization>
4383      <address><email></email></address>
4384    </author>
4385    <author initials='M.' surname='Nottingham' fullname='M. Nottingham'>
4386      <organization>BEA Systems</organization>
4387      <address><email></email></address>
4388    </author>
4389    <author initials='J.' surname='Mogul' fullname='J. Mogul'>
4390      <organization>HP Labs</organization>
4391      <address><email></email></address>
4392    </author>
4393    <date year='2004' month='September' />
4394  </front>
4395  <seriesInfo name='BCP' value='90' />
4396  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='3864' />
4399<reference anchor='RFC4033'>
4400  <front>
4401    <title>DNS Security Introduction and Requirements</title>
4402    <author initials='R.' surname='Arends' fullname='R. Arends'/>
4403    <author initials='R.' surname='Austein' fullname='R. Austein'/>
4404    <author initials='M.' surname='Larson' fullname='M. Larson'/>
4405    <author initials='D.' surname='Massey' fullname='D. Massey'/>
4406    <author initials='S.' surname='Rose' fullname='S. Rose'/>
4407    <date year='2005' month='March' />
4408  </front>
4409  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4033' />
4412<reference anchor="BCP13">
4413  <front>
4414    <title>Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures</title>
4415    <author initials="N." surname="Freed" fullname="N. Freed">
4416      <organization>Sun Microsystems</organization>
4417      <address>
4418        <email></email>
4419      </address>
4420    </author>
4421    <author initials="J." surname="Klensin" fullname="J. Klensin">
4422      <address>
4423        <email></email>
4424      </address>
4425    </author>
4426    <date year="2005" month="December"/>
4427  </front>
4428  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="13"/>
4429  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4288"/>
4432<reference anchor='BCP115'>
4433  <front>
4434    <title>Guidelines and Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes</title>
4435    <author initials='T.' surname='Hansen' fullname='T. Hansen'>
4436      <organization>AT&amp;T Laboratories</organization>
4437      <address>
4438        <email></email>
4439      </address>
4440    </author>
4441    <author initials='T.' surname='Hardie' fullname='T. Hardie'>
4442      <organization>Qualcomm, Inc.</organization>
4443      <address>
4444        <email></email>
4445      </address>
4446    </author>
4447    <author initials='L.' surname='Masinter' fullname='L. Masinter'>
4448      <organization>Adobe Systems</organization>
4449      <address>
4450        <email></email>
4451      </address>
4452    </author>
4453    <date year='2006' month='February' />
4454  </front>
4455  <seriesInfo name='BCP' value='115' />
4456  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4395' />
4459<reference anchor='RFC4559'>
4460  <front>
4461    <title>SPNEGO-based Kerberos and NTLM HTTP Authentication in Microsoft Windows</title>
4462    <author initials='K.' surname='Jaganathan' fullname='K. Jaganathan'/>
4463    <author initials='L.' surname='Zhu' fullname='L. Zhu'/>
4464    <author initials='J.' surname='Brezak' fullname='J. Brezak'/>
4465    <date year='2006' month='June' />
4466  </front>
4467  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4559' />
4470<reference anchor='RFC5226'>
4471  <front>
4472    <title>Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs</title>
4473    <author initials='T.' surname='Narten' fullname='T. Narten'>
4474      <organization>IBM</organization>
4475      <address><email></email></address>
4476    </author>
4477    <author initials='H.' surname='Alvestrand' fullname='H. Alvestrand'>
4478      <organization>Google</organization>
4479      <address><email></email></address>
4480    </author>
4481    <date year='2008' month='May' />
4482  </front>
4483  <seriesInfo name='BCP' value='26' />
4484  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='5226' />
4487<reference anchor='RFC5246'>
4488   <front>
4489      <title>The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2</title>
4490      <author initials='T.' surname='Dierks' fullname='T. Dierks'>
4491         <organization />
4492      </author>
4493      <author initials='E.' surname='Rescorla' fullname='E. Rescorla'>
4494         <organization>RTFM, Inc.</organization>
4495      </author>
4496      <date year='2008' month='August' />
4497   </front>
4498   <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='5246' />
4501<reference anchor="RFC5322">
4502  <front>
4503    <title>Internet Message Format</title>
4504    <author initials="P." surname="Resnick" fullname="P. Resnick">
4505      <organization>Qualcomm Incorporated</organization>
4506    </author>
4507    <date year="2008" month="October"/>
4508  </front>
4509  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5322"/>
4512<reference anchor="RFC6265">
4513  <front>
4514    <title>HTTP State Management Mechanism</title>
4515    <author initials="A." surname="Barth" fullname="Adam Barth">
4516      <organization abbrev="U.C. Berkeley">
4517        University of California, Berkeley
4518      </organization>
4519      <address><email></email></address>
4520    </author>
4521    <date year="2011" month="April" />
4522  </front>
4523  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6265"/>
4526<!--<reference anchor='BCP97'>
4527  <front>
4528    <title>Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents</title>
4529    <author initials='J.' surname='Klensin' fullname='J. Klensin'>
4530      <address>
4531        <email></email>
4532      </address>
4533    </author>
4534    <author initials='S.' surname='Hartman' fullname='S. Hartman'>
4535      <organization>MIT</organization>
4536      <address>
4537        <email></email>
4538      </address>
4539    </author>
4540    <date year='2007' month='June' />
4541  </front>
4542  <seriesInfo name='BCP' value='97' />
4543  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4897' />
4546<reference anchor="Kri2001" target="">
4547  <front>
4548    <title>HTTP Cookies: Standards, Privacy, and Politics</title>
4549    <author initials="D." surname="Kristol" fullname="David M. Kristol"/>
4550    <date year="2001" month="November"/>
4551  </front>
4552  <seriesInfo name="ACM Transactions on Internet Technology" value="Vol. 1, #2"/>
4558<section title="HTTP Version History" anchor="compatibility">
4560   HTTP has been in use by the World-Wide Web global information initiative
4561   since 1990. The first version of HTTP, later referred to as HTTP/0.9,
4562   was a simple protocol for hypertext data transfer across the Internet
4563   with only a single request method (GET) and no metadata.
4564   HTTP/1.0, as defined by <xref target="RFC1945"/>, added a range of request
4565   methods and MIME-like messaging that could include metadata about the data
4566   transferred and modifiers on the request/response semantics. However,
4567   HTTP/1.0 did not sufficiently take into consideration the effects of
4568   hierarchical proxies, caching, the need for persistent connections, or
4569   name-based virtual hosts. The proliferation of incompletely-implemented
4570   applications calling themselves "HTTP/1.0" further necessitated a
4571   protocol version change in order for two communicating applications
4572   to determine each other's true capabilities.
4575   HTTP/1.1 remains compatible with HTTP/1.0 by including more stringent
4576   requirements that enable reliable implementations, adding only
4577   those new features that will either be safely ignored by an HTTP/1.0
4578   recipient or only sent when communicating with a party advertising
4579   conformance with HTTP/1.1.
4582   It is beyond the scope of a protocol specification to mandate
4583   conformance with previous versions. HTTP/1.1 was deliberately
4584   designed, however, to make supporting previous versions easy.
4585   We would expect a general-purpose HTTP/1.1 server to understand
4586   any valid request in the format of HTTP/1.0 and respond appropriately
4587   with an HTTP/1.1 message that only uses features understood (or
4588   safely ignored) by HTTP/1.0 clients.  Likewise, we would expect
4589   an HTTP/1.1 client to understand any valid HTTP/1.0 response.
4592   Since HTTP/0.9 did not support header fields in a request,
4593   there is no mechanism for it to support name-based virtual
4594   hosts (selection of resource by inspection of the <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header
4595   field).  Any server that implements name-based virtual hosts
4596   ought to disable support for HTTP/0.9.  Most requests that
4597   appear to be HTTP/0.9 are, in fact, badly constructed HTTP/1.x
4598   requests wherein a buggy client failed to properly encode
4599   linear whitespace found in a URI reference and placed in
4600   the request-target.
4603<section title="Changes from HTTP/1.0" anchor="changes.from.1.0">
4605   This section summarizes major differences between versions HTTP/1.0
4606   and HTTP/1.1.
4609<section title="Multi-homed Web Servers" anchor="">
4611   The requirements that clients and servers support the <x:ref>Host</x:ref>
4612   header field (<xref target=""/>), report an error if it is
4613   missing from an HTTP/1.1 request, and accept absolute URIs (<xref target="request-target"/>)
4614   are among the most important changes defined by HTTP/1.1.
4617   Older HTTP/1.0 clients assumed a one-to-one relationship of IP
4618   addresses and servers; there was no other established mechanism for
4619   distinguishing the intended server of a request than the IP address
4620   to which that request was directed. The <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header field was
4621   introduced during the development of HTTP/1.1 and, though it was
4622   quickly implemented by most HTTP/1.0 browsers, additional requirements
4623   were placed on all HTTP/1.1 requests in order to ensure complete
4624   adoption.  At the time of this writing, most HTTP-based services
4625   are dependent upon the Host header field for targeting requests.
4629<section title="Keep-Alive Connections" anchor="compatibility.with.http.1.0.persistent.connections">
4631   In HTTP/1.0, each connection is established by the client prior to the
4632   request and closed by the server after sending the response. However, some
4633   implementations implement the explicitly negotiated ("Keep-Alive") version
4634   of persistent connections described in <xref x:sec="19.7.1" x:fmt="of"
4635   target="RFC2068"/>.
4638   Some clients and servers might wish to be compatible with these previous
4639   approaches to persistent connections, by explicitly negotiating for them
4640   with a "Connection: keep-alive" request header field. However, some
4641   experimental implementations of HTTP/1.0 persistent connections are faulty;
4642   for example, if an HTTP/1.0 proxy server doesn't understand
4643   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref>, it will erroneously forward that header field
4644   to the next inbound server, which would result in a hung connection.
4647   One attempted solution was the introduction of a Proxy-Connection header
4648   field, targeted specifically at proxies. In practice, this was also
4649   unworkable, because proxies are often deployed in multiple layers, bringing
4650   about the same problem discussed above.
4653   As a result, clients are encouraged not to send the Proxy-Connection header
4654   field in any requests.
4657   Clients are also encouraged to consider the use of Connection: keep-alive
4658   in requests carefully; while they can enable persistent connections with
4659   HTTP/1.0 servers, clients using them need will need to monitor the
4660   connection for "hung" requests (which indicate that the client ought stop
4661   sending the header field), and this mechanism ought not be used by clients
4662   at all when a proxy is being used.
4666<section title="Introduction of Transfer-Encoding" anchor="introduction.of.transfer-encoding">
4668   HTTP/1.1 introduces the <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header field
4669   (<xref target="header.transfer-encoding"/>). Proxies/gateways &MUST; remove
4670   any transfer coding prior to forwarding a message via a MIME-compliant
4671   protocol.
4677<section title="Changes from RFC 2616" anchor="changes.from.rfc.2616">
4679  HTTP's approach to error handling has been explained.
4680  (<xref target="conformance"/>)
4683  The expectation to support HTTP/0.9 requests has been removed.
4686  The term "Effective Request URI" has been introduced.
4687  (<xref target="effective.request.uri" />)
4690  HTTP messages can be (and often are) buffered by implementations; despite
4691  it sometimes being available as a stream, HTTP is fundamentally a
4692  message-oriented protocol.
4693  (<xref target="http.message" />)
4696  Minimum supported sizes for various protocol elements have been
4697  suggested, to improve interoperability.
4700  Header fields that span multiple lines ("line folding") are deprecated.
4701  (<xref target="field.parsing" />)
4704  The HTTP-version ABNF production has been clarified to be case-sensitive.
4705  Additionally, version numbers has been restricted to single digits, due
4706  to the fact that implementations are known to handle multi-digit version
4707  numbers incorrectly.
4708  (<xref target="http.version"/>)
4711  The HTTPS URI scheme is now defined by this specification; previously,
4712  it was done in  <xref target="RFC2818" x:fmt="of" x:sec="2.4"/>.
4713  (<xref target="https.uri"/>)
4716  The HTTPS URI scheme implies end-to-end security.
4717  (<xref target="https.uri"/>)
4720  Userinfo (i.e., username and password) are now disallowed in HTTP and
4721  HTTPS URIs, because of security issues related to their transmission on the
4722  wire.
4723  (<xref target="http.uri" />)
4726  Invalid whitespace around field-names is now required to be rejected,
4727  because accepting it represents a security vulnerability.
4728  (<xref target="header.fields"/>)
4731  The ABNF productions defining header fields now only list the field value.
4732  (<xref target="header.fields"/>)
4735  Rules about implicit linear whitespace between certain grammar productions
4736  have been removed; now whitespace is only allowed where specifically
4737  defined in the ABNF.
4738  (<xref target="whitespace"/>)
4741  The NUL octet is no longer allowed in comment and quoted-string text, and
4742  handling of backslash-escaping in them has been clarified.
4743  (<xref target="field.components"/>)
4746  The quoted-pair rule no longer allows escaping control characters other than
4747  HTAB.
4748  (<xref target="field.components"/>)
4751  Non-ASCII content in header fields and the reason phrase has been obsoleted
4752  and made opaque (the TEXT rule was removed).
4753  (<xref target="field.components"/>)
4756  Bogus "<x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref>" header fields are now required to be
4757  handled as errors by recipients.
4758  (<xref target="header.content-length"/>)
4761  The "identity" transfer coding token has been removed.
4762  (Sections <xref format="counter" target="message.body"/> and
4763  <xref format="counter" target="transfer.codings"/>)
4766  The algorithm for determining the message body length has been clarified
4767  to indicate all of the special cases (e.g., driven by methods or status
4768  codes) that affect it, and that new protocol elements cannot define such
4769  special cases.
4770  (<xref target="message.body.length"/>)
4773  "multipart/byteranges" is no longer a way of determining message body length
4774  detection.
4775  (<xref target="message.body.length"/>)
4778  CONNECT is a new, special case in determining message body length.
4779  (<xref target="message.body.length"/>)
4782  Chunk length does not include the count of the octets in the
4783  chunk header and trailer.
4784  (<xref target="chunked.encoding"/>)
4787  Use of chunk extensions is deprecated, and line folding in them is
4788  disallowed.
4789  (<xref target="chunked.encoding"/>)
4792  The path-absolute + query components of RFC3986 have been used to define the
4793  request-target, instead of abs_path from RFC 1808.
4794  (<xref target="request-target"/>)
4797  The asterisk form of the request-target is only allowed in the OPTIONS
4798  method.
4799  (<xref target="request-target"/>)
4802  Exactly when "close" connection options have to be sent has been clarified.
4803  (<xref target="header.connection"/>)
4806  "hop-by-hop" header fields are required to appear in the Connection header
4807  field; just because they're defined as hop-by-hop in this specification
4808  doesn't exempt them.
4809  (<xref target="header.connection"/>)
4812  The limit of two connections per server has been removed.
4813  (<xref target="persistent.connections"/>)
4816  An idempotent sequence of requests is no longer required to be retried.
4817  (<xref target="persistent.connections"/>)
4820  The requirement to retry requests under certain circumstances when the
4821  server prematurely closes the connection has been removed.
4822  (<xref target="persistent.connections"/>)
4825  Some extraneous requirements about when servers are allowed to close
4826  connections prematurely have been removed.
4827  (<xref target="persistent.connections"/>)
4830  The semantics of the <x:ref>Upgrade</x:ref> header field is now defined in
4831  responses other than 101 (this was incorporated from <xref
4832  target="RFC2817"/>).
4833  (<xref target="header.upgrade"/>)
4836  Registration of Transfer Codings now requires IETF Review
4837  (<xref target="transfer.coding.registry"/>)
4840  The meaning of the "deflate" content coding has been clarified.
4841  (<xref target="deflate.coding" />)
4844  This specification now defines the Upgrade Token Registry, previously
4845  defined in <xref target="RFC2817" x:fmt="of" x:sec="7.2"/>.
4846  (<xref target="upgrade.token.registry"/>)
4849  Empty list elements in list productions (e.g., a list header containing
4850  ", ,") have been deprecated.
4851  (<xref target="abnf.extension"/>)
4854  Issues with the Keep-Alive and Proxy-Connection headers in requests
4855  are pointed out, with use of the latter being discouraged altogether.
4856  (<xref target="compatibility.with.http.1.0.persistent.connections" />)
4861<section title="ABNF list extension: #rule" anchor="abnf.extension">
4863  A #rule extension to the ABNF rules of <xref target="RFC5234"/> is used to
4864  improve readability in the definitions of some header field values.
4867  A construct "#" is defined, similar to "*", for defining comma-delimited
4868  lists of elements. The full form is "&lt;n&gt;#&lt;m&gt;element" indicating
4869  at least &lt;n&gt; and at most &lt;m&gt; elements, each separated by a single
4870  comma (",") and optional whitespace (OWS).   
4873  Thus,
4874</preamble><artwork type="example">
4875  1#element =&gt; element *( OWS "," OWS element )
4878  and:
4879</preamble><artwork type="example">
4880  #element =&gt; [ 1#element ]
4883  and for n &gt;= 1 and m &gt; 1:
4884</preamble><artwork type="example">
4885  &lt;n&gt;#&lt;m&gt;element =&gt; element &lt;n-1&gt;*&lt;m-1&gt;( OWS "," OWS element )
4888  For compatibility with legacy list rules, recipients &SHOULD; accept empty
4889  list elements. In other words, consumers would follow the list productions:
4891<figure><artwork type="example">
4892  #element =&gt; [ ( "," / element ) *( OWS "," [ OWS element ] ) ]
4894  1#element =&gt; *( "," OWS ) element *( OWS "," [ OWS element ] )
4897  Note that empty elements do not contribute to the count of elements present,
4898  though.
4901  For example, given these ABNF productions:
4903<figure><artwork type="example">
4904  example-list      = 1#example-list-elmt
4905  example-list-elmt = token ; see <xref target="field.components"/>
4908  Then these are valid values for example-list (not including the double
4909  quotes, which are present for delimitation only):
4911<figure><artwork type="example">
4912  "foo,bar"
4913  "foo ,bar,"
4914  "foo , ,bar,charlie   "
4917  But these values would be invalid, as at least one non-empty element is
4918  required:
4920<figure><artwork type="example">
4921  ""
4922  ","
4923  ",   ,"
4926  <xref target="collected.abnf"/> shows the collected ABNF, with the list rules
4927  expanded as explained above.
4931<?BEGININC p1-messaging.abnf-appendix ?>
4932<section xmlns:x="" title="Collected ABNF" anchor="collected.abnf">
4934<artwork type="abnf" name="p1-messaging.parsed-abnf">
4935<x:ref>BWS</x:ref> = OWS
4937<x:ref>Connection</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) connection-option *( OWS "," [ OWS
4938 connection-option ] )
4939<x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> = 1*DIGIT
4941<x:ref>HTTP-message</x:ref> = start-line *( header-field CRLF ) CRLF [ message-body
4942 ]
4943<x:ref>HTTP-name</x:ref> = %x48.54.54.50 ; HTTP
4944<x:ref>HTTP-version</x:ref> = HTTP-name "/" DIGIT "." DIGIT
4945<x:ref>Host</x:ref> = uri-host [ ":" port ]
4947<x:ref>OWS</x:ref> = *( SP / HTAB )
4949<x:ref>RWS</x:ref> = 1*( SP / HTAB )
4951<x:ref>TE</x:ref> = [ ( "," / t-codings ) *( OWS "," [ OWS t-codings ] ) ]
4952<x:ref>Trailer</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) field-name *( OWS "," [ OWS field-name ] )
4953<x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) transfer-coding *( OWS "," [ OWS
4954 transfer-coding ] )
4956<x:ref>URI-reference</x:ref> = &lt;URI-reference, defined in [RFC3986], Section 4.1&gt;
4957<x:ref>Upgrade</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) protocol *( OWS "," [ OWS protocol ] )
4959<x:ref>Via</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) ( received-protocol RWS received-by [ RWS comment
4960 ] ) *( OWS "," [ OWS ( received-protocol RWS received-by [ RWS
4961 comment ] ) ] )
4963<x:ref>absolute-URI</x:ref> = &lt;absolute-URI, defined in [RFC3986], Section 4.3&gt;
4964<x:ref>absolute-form</x:ref> = absolute-URI
4965<x:ref>asterisk-form</x:ref> = "*"
4966<x:ref>attribute</x:ref> = token
4967<x:ref>authority</x:ref> = &lt;authority, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.2&gt;
4968<x:ref>authority-form</x:ref> = authority
4970<x:ref>chunk</x:ref> = chunk-size [ chunk-ext ] CRLF chunk-data CRLF
4971<x:ref>chunk-data</x:ref> = 1*OCTET
4972<x:ref>chunk-ext</x:ref> = *( ";" chunk-ext-name [ "=" chunk-ext-val ] )
4973<x:ref>chunk-ext-name</x:ref> = token
4974<x:ref>chunk-ext-val</x:ref> = token / quoted-str-nf
4975<x:ref>chunk-size</x:ref> = 1*HEXDIG
4976<x:ref>chunked-body</x:ref> = *chunk last-chunk trailer-part CRLF
4977<x:ref>comment</x:ref> = "(" *( ctext / quoted-cpair / comment ) ")"
4978<x:ref>connection-option</x:ref> = token
4979<x:ref>ctext</x:ref> = HTAB / SP / %x21-27 ; '!'-'''
4980 / %x2A-5B ; '*'-'['
4981 / %x5D-7E ; ']'-'~'
4982 / obs-text
4984<x:ref>field-content</x:ref> = *( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
4985<x:ref>field-name</x:ref> = token
4986<x:ref>field-value</x:ref> = *( field-content / obs-fold )
4988<x:ref>header-field</x:ref> = field-name ":" OWS field-value BWS
4989<x:ref>http-URI</x:ref> = "http://" authority path-abempty [ "?" query ]
4990<x:ref>https-URI</x:ref> = "https://" authority path-abempty [ "?" query ]
4992<x:ref>last-chunk</x:ref> = 1*"0" [ chunk-ext ] CRLF
4994<x:ref>message-body</x:ref> = *OCTET
4995<x:ref>method</x:ref> = token
4997<x:ref>obs-fold</x:ref> = CRLF ( SP / HTAB )
4998<x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> = %x80-FF
4999<x:ref>origin-form</x:ref> = path-absolute [ "?" query ]
5001<x:ref>partial-URI</x:ref> = relative-part [ "?" query ]
5002<x:ref>path-abempty</x:ref> = &lt;path-abempty, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.3&gt;
5003<x:ref>path-absolute</x:ref> = &lt;path-absolute, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.3&gt;
5004<x:ref>port</x:ref> = &lt;port, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.2.3&gt;
5005<x:ref>protocol</x:ref> = protocol-name [ "/" protocol-version ]
5006<x:ref>protocol-name</x:ref> = token
5007<x:ref>protocol-version</x:ref> = token
5008<x:ref>pseudonym</x:ref> = token
5010<x:ref>qdtext</x:ref> = HTAB / SP / "!" / %x23-5B ; '#'-'['
5011 / %x5D-7E ; ']'-'~'
5012 / obs-text
5013<x:ref>qdtext-nf</x:ref> = HTAB / SP / "!" / %x23-5B ; '#'-'['
5014 / %x5D-7E ; ']'-'~'
5015 / obs-text
5016<x:ref>query</x:ref> = &lt;query, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.4&gt;
5017<x:ref>quoted-cpair</x:ref> = "\" ( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
5018<x:ref>quoted-pair</x:ref> = "\" ( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
5019<x:ref>quoted-str-nf</x:ref> = DQUOTE *( qdtext-nf / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE
5020<x:ref>quoted-string</x:ref> = DQUOTE *( qdtext / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE
5022<x:ref>rank</x:ref> = ( "0" [ "." *3DIGIT ] ) / ( "1" [ "." *3"0" ] )
5023<x:ref>reason-phrase</x:ref> = *( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
5024<x:ref>received-by</x:ref> = ( uri-host [ ":" port ] ) / pseudonym
5025<x:ref>received-protocol</x:ref> = [ protocol-name "/" ] protocol-version
5026<x:ref>relative-part</x:ref> = &lt;relative-part, defined in [RFC3986], Section 4.2&gt;
5027<x:ref>request-line</x:ref> = method SP request-target SP HTTP-version CRLF
5028<x:ref>request-target</x:ref> = origin-form / absolute-form / authority-form /
5029 asterisk-form
5031<x:ref>special</x:ref> = "(" / ")" / "&lt;" / "&gt;" / "@" / "," / ";" / ":" / "\" /
5032 DQUOTE / "/" / "[" / "]" / "?" / "=" / "{" / "}"
5033<x:ref>start-line</x:ref> = request-line / status-line
5034<x:ref>status-code</x:ref> = 3DIGIT
5035<x:ref>status-line</x:ref> = HTTP-version SP status-code SP reason-phrase CRLF
5037<x:ref>t-codings</x:ref> = "trailers" / ( transfer-coding [ t-ranking ] )
5038<x:ref>t-ranking</x:ref> = OWS ";" OWS "q=" rank
5039<x:ref>tchar</x:ref> = "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&amp;" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "." /
5040 "^" / "_" / "`" / "|" / "~" / DIGIT / ALPHA
5041<x:ref>token</x:ref> = 1*tchar
5042<x:ref>trailer-part</x:ref> = *( header-field CRLF )
5043<x:ref>transfer-coding</x:ref> = "chunked" / "compress" / "deflate" / "gzip" /
5044 transfer-extension
5045<x:ref>transfer-extension</x:ref> = token *( OWS ";" OWS transfer-parameter )
5046<x:ref>transfer-parameter</x:ref> = attribute BWS "=" BWS value
5048<x:ref>uri-host</x:ref> = &lt;host, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.2.2&gt;
5050<x:ref>value</x:ref> = word
5052<x:ref>word</x:ref> = token / quoted-string
5056<?ENDINC p1-messaging.abnf-appendix ?>
5058<section title="Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)" anchor="change.log">
5060<section title="Since RFC 2616">
5062  Changes up to the first Working Group Last Call draft are summarized
5063  in <eref target=""/>.
5067<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-21" anchor="changes.since.21">
5069  Closed issues:
5070  <list style="symbols">
5071    <t>
5072      <eref target=""/>:
5073      "Cite HTTPS URI scheme definition" (the spec now includes the HTTPs
5074      scheme definition and thus updates RFC 2818)
5075    </t>
5076    <t>
5077      <eref target=""/>:
5078      "mention of 'proxies' in section about caches"
5079    </t>
5080    <t>
5081      <eref target=""/>:
5082      "use of ABNF terms from RFC 3986"
5083    </t>
5084    <t>
5085      <eref target=""/>:
5086      "editorial improvements to message length definition"
5087    </t>
5088    <t>
5089      <eref target=""/>:
5090      "Connection header field MUST vs SHOULD"
5091    </t>
5092    <t>
5093      <eref target=""/>:
5094      "editorial improvements to persistent connections section"
5095    </t>
5096    <t>
5097      <eref target=""/>:
5098      "URI normalization vs empty path"
5099    </t>
5100    <t>
5101      <eref target=""/>:
5102      "p1 feedback"
5103    </t>
5104    <t>
5105      <eref target=""/>:
5106      "is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory?"
5107    </t>
5108    <t>
5109      <eref target=""/>:
5110      "HTTPS and Shared Caching"
5111    </t>
5112    <t>
5113      <eref target=""/>:
5114      "Requirements for recipients of ws between start-line and first header field"
5115    </t>
5116    <t>
5117      <eref target=""/>:
5118      "SP and HT when being tolerant"
5119    </t>
5120    <t>
5121      <eref target=""/>:
5122      "Message Parsing Strictness"
5123    </t>
5124    <t>
5125      <eref target=""/>:
5126      "'Render'"
5127    </t>
5128    <t>
5129      <eref target=""/>:
5130      "No-Transform"
5131    </t>
5132    <t>
5133      <eref target=""/>:
5134      "p2 editorial feedback"
5135    </t>
5136    <t>
5137      <eref target=""/>:
5138      "Content-Length SHOULD be sent"
5139    </t>
5140  </list>
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.