source: draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.xml @ 1747

Last change on this file since 1747 was 1747, checked in by fielding@…, 7 years ago

fix [1682] so that it takes roles into consideration (#361)

  • Property svn:eol-style set to native
  • Property svn:mime-type set to text/xml
File size: 248.1 KB
Line 
1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
2<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='../myxml2rfc.xslt'?>
3<!DOCTYPE rfc [
4  <!ENTITY MAY "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>MAY</bcp14>">
5  <!ENTITY MUST "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>MUST</bcp14>">
6  <!ENTITY MUST-NOT "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>MUST NOT</bcp14>">
7  <!ENTITY OPTIONAL "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>OPTIONAL</bcp14>">
8  <!ENTITY RECOMMENDED "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>">
9  <!ENTITY REQUIRED "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>REQUIRED</bcp14>">
10  <!ENTITY SHALL "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>SHALL</bcp14>">
11  <!ENTITY SHALL-NOT "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>SHALL NOT</bcp14>">
12  <!ENTITY SHOULD "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>SHOULD</bcp14>">
13  <!ENTITY SHOULD-NOT "<bcp14 xmlns='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>">
14  <!ENTITY ID-VERSION "latest">
15  <!ENTITY ID-MONTH "July">
16  <!ENTITY ID-YEAR "2012">
17  <!ENTITY mdash "&#8212;">
18  <!ENTITY Note "<x:h xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>Note:</x:h>">
19  <!ENTITY caching-overview       "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#caching.overview' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
20  <!ENTITY cache-incomplete       "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#response.cacheability' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
21  <!ENTITY payload                "<xref target='Part2' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
22  <!ENTITY media-types            "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#media.types' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
23  <!ENTITY content-codings        "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#content.codings' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
24  <!ENTITY CONNECT                "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#CONNECT' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
25  <!ENTITY content.negotiation    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#content.negotiation' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
26  <!ENTITY diff-mime              "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#differences.between.http.and.mime' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
27  <!ENTITY representation         "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#representation' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
28  <!ENTITY header-cache-control   "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.cache-control' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
29  <!ENTITY header-content-encoding    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.content-encoding' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
30  <!ENTITY header-content-range   "<xref target='Part5' x:rel='#header.content-range' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
31  <!ENTITY header-content-type    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.content-type' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
32  <!ENTITY header-date            "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.date' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
33  <!ENTITY header-expect          "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#header.expect' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
34  <!ENTITY header-expires         "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.expires' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
35  <!ENTITY header-mime-version    "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#mime-version' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
36  <!ENTITY header-pragma          "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.pragma' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
37  <!ENTITY header-warning         "<xref target='Part6' x:rel='#header.warning' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
38  <!ENTITY header-proxy-authenticate  "<xref target='Part7' x:rel='#header.proxy-authenticate' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
39  <!ENTITY header-proxy-authorization "<xref target='Part7' x:rel='#header.proxy-authorization' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
40  <!ENTITY idempotent-methods     "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#idempotent.methods' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
41  <!ENTITY methods                "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#methods' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
42  <!ENTITY OPTIONS                "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#OPTIONS' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
43  <!ENTITY status-codes           "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.codes' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
44  <!ENTITY status-100             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.100' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
45  <!ENTITY status-1xx             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.1xx' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
46  <!ENTITY status-203             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.203' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
47  <!ENTITY status-3xx             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.3xx' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
48  <!ENTITY status-304             "<xref target='Part4' x:rel='#status.304' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
49  <!ENTITY status-4xx             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.4xx' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
50  <!ENTITY status-414             "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#status.414' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
51  <!ENTITY cons-new-header-fields "<xref target='Part2' x:rel='#considerations.for.creating.header.fields' xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'/>">
52]>
53<?rfc toc="yes" ?>
54<?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
55<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
56<?rfc compact="yes"?>
57<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
58<?rfc linkmailto="no" ?>
59<?rfc editing="no" ?>
60<?rfc comments="yes"?>
61<?rfc inline="yes"?>
62<?rfc rfcedstyle="yes"?>
63<?rfc-ext allow-markup-in-artwork="yes" ?>
64<?rfc-ext include-references-in-index="yes" ?>
65<rfc obsoletes="2145,2616" updates="2817" category="std" x:maturity-level="proposed"
66     ipr="pre5378Trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-&ID-VERSION;"
67     xmlns:x='http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext'>
68<x:link rel="next" basename="p2-semantics"/>
69<x:feedback template="mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org?subject={docname},%20%22{section}%22&amp;body=&lt;{ref}&gt;:"/>
70<front>
71
72  <title abbrev="HTTP/1.1, Part 1">HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing</title>
73
74  <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
75    <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
76    <address>
77      <postal>
78        <street>345 Park Ave</street>
79        <city>San Jose</city>
80        <region>CA</region>
81        <code>95110</code>
82        <country>USA</country>
83      </postal>
84      <email>fielding@gbiv.com</email>
85      <uri>http://roy.gbiv.com/</uri>
86    </address>
87  </author>
88
89  <author initials="Y." surname="Lafon" fullname="Yves Lafon" role="editor">
90    <organization abbrev="W3C">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
91    <address>
92      <postal>
93        <street>W3C / ERCIM</street>
94        <street>2004, rte des Lucioles</street>
95        <city>Sophia-Antipolis</city>
96        <region>AM</region>
97        <code>06902</code>
98        <country>France</country>
99      </postal>
100      <email>ylafon@w3.org</email>
101      <uri>http://www.raubacapeu.net/people/yves/</uri>
102    </address>
103  </author>
104
105  <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
106    <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
107    <address>
108      <postal>
109        <street>Hafenweg 16</street>
110        <city>Muenster</city><region>NW</region><code>48155</code>
111        <country>Germany</country>
112      </postal>
113      <email>julian.reschke@greenbytes.de</email>
114      <uri>http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/</uri>
115    </address>
116  </author>
117
118  <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
119  <workgroup>HTTPbis Working Group</workgroup>
120
121<abstract>
122<t>
123   The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for
124   distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. HTTP has been in
125   use by the World Wide Web global information initiative since 1990. This
126   document is Part 1 of the seven-part specification that defines the protocol
127   referred to as "HTTP/1.1" and, taken together, obsoletes
128   <xref target="RFC2616" x:fmt="none">RFC 2616</xref> and moves it to historic
129   status, along with its predecessor <xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="none">RFC
130   2068</xref>.
131</t>
132<t>
133   Part 1 provides an overview of HTTP and its associated terminology, defines
134   the "http" and "https" Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes, defines
135   the generic message syntax and parsing requirements for HTTP message frames,
136   and describes general security concerns for implementations.
137</t>
138<t>
139   This part also obsoletes RFCs <xref target="RFC2145" x:fmt="none">2145</xref>
140   (on HTTP version numbers) and <xref target="RFC2817" x:fmt="none">2817</xref>
141   (on using CONNECT for TLS upgrades) and moves them to historic status.
142</t>
143</abstract>
144
145<note title="Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)">
146  <t>
147    Discussion of this draft ought to take place on the HTTPBIS working group
148    mailing list (ietf-http-wg@w3.org), which is archived at
149    <eref target="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/"/>.
150  </t>
151  <t>
152    The current issues list is at
153    <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/3"/> and related
154    documents (including fancy diffs) can be found at
155    <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/"/>.
156  </t>
157  <t>
158    The changes in this draft are summarized in <xref target="changes.since.19"/>.
159  </t>
160</note>
161</front>
162<middle>
163<section title="Introduction" anchor="introduction">
164<t>
165   The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level
166   request/response protocol that uses extensible semantics and MIME-like
167   message payloads for flexible interaction with network-based hypertext
168   information systems. HTTP relies upon the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)
169   standard <xref target="RFC3986"/> to indicate the target resource
170   (<xref target="target-resource"/>) and relationships between resources.
171   Messages are passed in a format similar to that used by Internet mail
172   <xref target="RFC5322"/> and the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions
173   (MIME) <xref target="RFC2045"/> (see &diff-mime; for the differences
174   between HTTP and MIME messages).
175</t>
176<t>
177   HTTP is a generic interface protocol for information systems. It is
178   designed to hide the details of how a service is implemented by presenting
179   a uniform interface to clients that is independent of the types of
180   resources provided. Likewise, servers do not need to be aware of each
181   client's purpose: an HTTP request can be considered in isolation rather
182   than being associated with a specific type of client or a predetermined
183   sequence of application steps. The result is a protocol that can be used
184   effectively in many different contexts and for which implementations can
185   evolve independently over time.
186</t>
187<t>
188   HTTP is also designed for use as an intermediation protocol for translating
189   communication to and from non-HTTP information systems.
190   HTTP proxies and gateways can provide access to alternative information
191   services by translating their diverse protocols into a hypertext
192   format that can be viewed and manipulated by clients in the same way
193   as HTTP services.
194</t>
195<t>
196   One consequence of HTTP flexibility is that the protocol cannot be
197   defined in terms of what occurs behind the interface. Instead, we
198   are limited to defining the syntax of communication, the intent
199   of received communication, and the expected behavior of recipients.
200   If the communication is considered in isolation, then successful
201   actions ought to be reflected in corresponding changes to the
202   observable interface provided by servers. However, since multiple
203   clients might act in parallel and perhaps at cross-purposes, we
204   cannot require that such changes be observable beyond the scope
205   of a single response.
206</t>
207<t>
208   This document is Part 1 of the seven-part specification of HTTP,
209   defining the protocol referred to as "HTTP/1.1", obsoleting
210   <xref target="RFC2616"/> and <xref target="RFC2145"/>.
211   Part 1 describes the architectural elements that are used or
212   referred to in HTTP, defines the "http" and "https" URI schemes,
213   describes overall network operation and connection management,
214   and defines HTTP message framing and forwarding requirements.
215   Our goal is to define all of the mechanisms necessary for HTTP message
216   handling that are independent of message semantics, thereby defining the
217   complete set of requirements for message parsers and
218   message-forwarding intermediaries.
219</t>
220
221<section title="Requirement Notation" anchor="intro.requirements">
222<t>
223   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
224   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
225   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
226</t>
227</section>
228
229<section title="Syntax Notation" anchor="notation">
230<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="ALPHA"/>
231<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="CR"/>
232<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="CRLF"/>
233<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="CTL"/>
234<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="DIGIT"/>
235<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="DQUOTE"/>
236<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HEXDIG"/>
237<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HTAB"/>
238<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="LF"/>
239<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="OCTET"/>
240<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="SP"/>
241<iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="VCHAR"/>
242<t>
243   This specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation
244   of <xref target="RFC5234"/> with the list rule extension defined in
245   <xref target="abnf.extension"/><xref target="collected.abnf"/> shows
246   the collected ABNF with the list rule expanded.
247</t>
248<t anchor="core.rules">
249  <x:anchor-alias value="ALPHA"/>
250  <x:anchor-alias value="CTL"/>
251  <x:anchor-alias value="CR"/>
252  <x:anchor-alias value="CRLF"/>
253  <x:anchor-alias value="DIGIT"/>
254  <x:anchor-alias value="DQUOTE"/>
255  <x:anchor-alias value="HEXDIG"/>
256  <x:anchor-alias value="HTAB"/>
257  <x:anchor-alias value="LF"/>
258  <x:anchor-alias value="OCTET"/>
259  <x:anchor-alias value="SP"/>
260  <x:anchor-alias value="VCHAR"/>
261   The following core rules are included by
262   reference, as defined in <xref target="RFC5234" x:fmt="," x:sec="B.1"/>:
263   ALPHA (letters), CR (carriage return), CRLF (CR LF), CTL (controls),
264   DIGIT (decimal 0-9), DQUOTE (double quote),
265   HEXDIG (hexadecimal 0-9/A-F/a-f), HTAB (horizontal tab), LF (line feed),
266   OCTET (any 8-bit sequence of data), SP (space), and
267   VCHAR (any visible <xref target="USASCII"/> character).
268</t>
269<t>
270   As a convention, ABNF rule names prefixed with "obs-" denote
271   "obsolete" grammar rules that appear for historical reasons.
272</t>
273</section>
274</section>
275
276<section title="Architecture" anchor="architecture">
277<t>
278   HTTP was created for the World Wide Web architecture
279   and has evolved over time to support the scalability needs of a worldwide
280   hypertext system. Much of that architecture is reflected in the terminology
281   and syntax productions used to define HTTP.
282</t>
283
284<section title="Client/Server Messaging" anchor="operation">
285<iref primary="true" item="client"/>
286<iref primary="true" item="server"/>
287<iref primary="true" item="connection"/>
288<t>
289   HTTP is a stateless request/response protocol that operates by exchanging
290   <x:dfn>messages</x:dfn> (<xref target="http.message"/>) across a reliable
291   transport or session-layer
292   "<x:dfn>connection</x:dfn>". An HTTP "<x:dfn>client</x:dfn>" is a
293   program that establishes a connection to a server for the purpose of
294   sending one or more HTTP requests.  An HTTP "<x:dfn>server</x:dfn>" is a
295   program that accepts connections in order to service HTTP requests by
296   sending HTTP responses.
297</t>
298<iref primary="true" item="user agent"/>
299<iref primary="true" item="origin server"/>
300<iref primary="true" item="browser"/>
301<iref primary="true" item="spider"/>
302<iref primary="true" item="sender"/>
303<iref primary="true" item="recipient"/>
304<t>
305   Note that the terms client and server refer only to the roles that
306   these programs perform for a particular connection.  The same program
307   might act as a client on some connections and a server on others.  We use
308   the term "<x:dfn>user agent</x:dfn>" to refer to the program that initiates a request,
309   such as a WWW browser, editor, or spider (web-traversing robot), and
310   the term "<x:dfn>origin server</x:dfn>" to refer to the program that can originate
311   authoritative responses to a request.  For general requirements, we use
312   the term "<x:dfn>sender</x:dfn>" to refer to whichever component sent a given message
313   and the term "<x:dfn>recipient</x:dfn>" to refer to any component that receives the
314   message.
315</t>
316<x:note>
317  <t>
318    &Note; The term 'user agent' covers both those situations where
319    there is a user (human) interacting with the software agent (and for which
320    user interface or interactive suggestions might be made, e.g., warning the
321    user or given the user an option in the case of security or privacy
322    options) and also those where the software agent can act autonomously.
323  </t>
324</x:note>
325<t>
326   Most HTTP communication consists of a retrieval request (GET) for
327   a representation of some resource identified by a URI.  In the
328   simplest case, this might be accomplished via a single bidirectional
329   connection (===) between the user agent (UA) and the origin server (O).
330</t>
331<figure><artwork type="drawing">
332         request   &gt;
333    <x:highlight>UA</x:highlight> ======================================= <x:highlight>O</x:highlight>
334                                &lt;   response
335</artwork></figure>
336<iref primary="true" item="message"/>
337<iref primary="true" item="request"/>
338<iref primary="true" item="response"/>
339<t>
340   A client sends an HTTP request to the server in the form of a <x:dfn>request</x:dfn>
341   message, beginning with a request-line that includes a method, URI, and
342   protocol version (<xref target="request.line"/>),
343   followed by MIME-like header fields containing
344   request modifiers, client information, and representation metadata
345   (<xref target="header.fields"/>),
346   an empty line to indicate the end of the header section, and finally
347   a message body containing the payload body (if any,
348   <xref target="message.body"/>).
349</t>
350<t>
351   A server responds to the client's request by sending one or more HTTP
352   <x:dfn>response</x:dfn>
353   messages, each beginning with a status line that
354   includes the protocol version, a success or error code, and textual
355   reason phrase (<xref target="status.line"/>),
356   possibly followed by MIME-like header fields containing server
357   information, resource metadata, and representation metadata
358   (<xref target="header.fields"/>),
359   an empty line to indicate the end of the header section, and finally
360   a message body containing the payload body (if any,
361   <xref target="message.body"/>).
362</t>
363<t>
364   The following example illustrates a typical message exchange for a
365   GET request on the URI "http://www.example.com/hello.txt":
366</t>
367<figure><preamble>
368client request:
369</preamble><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
370GET /hello.txt HTTP/1.1
371User-Agent: curl/7.16.3 libcurl/7.16.3 OpenSSL/0.9.7l zlib/1.2.3
372Host: www.example.com
373Accept: */*
374
375</artwork></figure>
376<figure><preamble>
377server response:
378</preamble><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;response&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
379HTTP/1.1 200 OK
380Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:28:53 GMT
381Server: Apache
382Last-Modified: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:15:56 GMT
383ETag: "34aa387-d-1568eb00"
384Accept-Ranges: bytes
385Content-Length: <x:length-of target="exbody"/>
386Vary: Accept-Encoding
387Content-Type: text/plain
388
389<x:span anchor="exbody">Hello World!
390</x:span></artwork></figure>
391</section>
392
393<section title="Connections and Transport Independence" anchor="transport-independence">
394<t>
395   HTTP messaging is independent of the underlying transport or
396   session-layer connection protocol(s).  HTTP only presumes a reliable
397   transport with in-order delivery of requests and the corresponding
398   in-order delivery of responses.  The mapping of HTTP request and
399   response structures onto the data units of the underlying transport
400   protocol is outside the scope of this specification.
401</t>
402<t>
403   The specific connection protocols to be used for an interaction
404   are determined by client configuration and the target URI
405   (<xref target="target-resource"/>).
406   For example, the "http" URI scheme
407   (<xref target="http.uri"/>) indicates a default connection of TCP
408   over IP, with a default TCP port of 80, but the client might be
409   configured to use a proxy via some other connection port or protocol
410   instead of using the defaults.
411</t>
412<t>
413   A connection might be used for multiple HTTP request/response exchanges,
414   as defined in <xref target="persistent.connections"/>.
415</t>
416</section>
417
418<section title="Intermediaries" anchor="intermediaries">
419<iref primary="true" item="intermediary"/>
420<t>
421   HTTP enables the use of intermediaries to satisfy requests through
422   a chain of connections.  There are three common forms of HTTP
423   <x:dfn>intermediary</x:dfn>: proxy, gateway, and tunnel.  In some cases,
424   a single intermediary might act as an origin server, proxy, gateway,
425   or tunnel, switching behavior based on the nature of each request.
426</t>
427<figure><artwork type="drawing">
428         &gt;             &gt;             &gt;             &gt;
429    <x:highlight>UA</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>A</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>B</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>C</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>O</x:highlight>
430               &lt;             &lt;             &lt;             &lt;
431</artwork></figure>
432<t>
433   The figure above shows three intermediaries (A, B, and C) between the
434   user agent and origin server. A request or response message that
435   travels the whole chain will pass through four separate connections.
436   Some HTTP communication options
437   might apply only to the connection with the nearest, non-tunnel
438   neighbor, only to the end-points of the chain, or to all connections
439   along the chain. Although the diagram is linear, each participant might
440   be engaged in multiple, simultaneous communications. For example, B
441   might be receiving requests from many clients other than A, and/or
442   forwarding requests to servers other than C, at the same time that it
443   is handling A's request.
444</t>
445<t>
446<iref primary="true" item="upstream"/><iref primary="true" item="downstream"/>
447<iref primary="true" item="inbound"/><iref primary="true" item="outbound"/>
448   We use the terms "<x:dfn>upstream</x:dfn>" and "<x:dfn>downstream</x:dfn>"
449   to describe various requirements in relation to the directional flow of a
450   message: all messages flow from upstream to downstream.
451   Likewise, we use the terms inbound and outbound to refer to
452   directions in relation to the request path:
453   "<x:dfn>inbound</x:dfn>" means toward the origin server and
454   "<x:dfn>outbound</x:dfn>" means toward the user agent.
455</t>
456<t><iref primary="true" item="proxy"/>
457   A "<x:dfn>proxy</x:dfn>" is a message forwarding agent that is selected by the
458   client, usually via local configuration rules, to receive requests
459   for some type(s) of absolute URI and attempt to satisfy those
460   requests via translation through the HTTP interface.  Some translations
461   are minimal, such as for proxy requests for "http" URIs, whereas
462   other requests might require translation to and from entirely different
463   application-layer protocols. Proxies are often used to group an
464   organization's HTTP requests through a common intermediary for the
465   sake of security, annotation services, or shared caching.
466</t>
467<t>
468<iref primary="true" item="transforming proxy"/>
469<iref primary="true" item="non-transforming proxy"/>
470   An HTTP-to-HTTP proxy is called a "<x:dfn>transforming proxy</x:dfn>" if it is designed
471   or configured to modify request or response messages in a semantically
472   meaningful way (i.e., modifications, beyond those required by normal
473   HTTP processing, that change the message in a way that would be
474   significant to the original sender or potentially significant to
475   downstream recipients).  For example, a transforming proxy might be
476   acting as a shared annotation server (modifying responses to include
477   references to a local annotation database), a malware filter, a
478   format transcoder, or an intranet-to-Internet privacy filter.  Such
479   transformations are presumed to be desired by the client (or client
480   organization) that selected the proxy and are beyond the scope of
481   this specification.  However, when a proxy is not intended to transform
482   a given message, we use the term "<x:dfn>non-transforming proxy</x:dfn>" to target
483   requirements that preserve HTTP message semantics. See &status-203; and
484   &header-warning; for status and warning codes related to transformations.
485</t>
486<t><iref primary="true" item="gateway"/><iref primary="true" item="reverse proxy"/>
487<iref primary="true" item="accelerator"/>
488   A "<x:dfn>gateway</x:dfn>" (a.k.a., "<x:dfn>reverse proxy</x:dfn>")
489   is a receiving agent that acts
490   as a layer above some other server(s) and translates the received
491   requests to the underlying server's protocol.  Gateways are often
492   used to encapsulate legacy or untrusted information services, to
493   improve server performance through "<x:dfn>accelerator</x:dfn>" caching, and to
494   enable partitioning or load-balancing of HTTP services across
495   multiple machines.
496</t>
497<t>
498   A gateway behaves as an origin server on its outbound connection and
499   as a user agent on its inbound connection.
500   All HTTP requirements applicable to an origin server
501   also apply to the outbound communication of a gateway.
502   A gateway communicates with inbound servers using any protocol that
503   it desires, including private extensions to HTTP that are outside
504   the scope of this specification.  However, an HTTP-to-HTTP gateway
505   that wishes to interoperate with third-party HTTP servers &MUST;
506   conform to HTTP user agent requirements on the gateway's inbound
507   connection and &MUST; implement the <x:ref>Connection</x:ref>
508   (<xref target="header.connection"/>) and <x:ref>Via</x:ref>
509   (<xref target="header.via"/>) header fields for both connections.
510</t>
511<t><iref primary="true" item="tunnel"/>
512   A "<x:dfn>tunnel</x:dfn>" acts as a blind relay between two connections
513   without changing the messages. Once active, a tunnel is not
514   considered a party to the HTTP communication, though the tunnel might
515   have been initiated by an HTTP request. A tunnel ceases to exist when
516   both ends of the relayed connection are closed. Tunnels are used to
517   extend a virtual connection through an intermediary, such as when
518   transport-layer security is used to establish private communication
519   through a shared firewall proxy.
520</t>
521<t><iref primary="true" item="interception proxy"/>
522<iref primary="true" item="transparent proxy"/>
523<iref primary="true" item="captive portal"/>
524   The above categories for intermediary only consider those acting as
525   participants in the HTTP communication.  There are also intermediaries
526   that can act on lower layers of the network protocol stack, filtering or
527   redirecting HTTP traffic without the knowledge or permission of message
528   senders. Network intermediaries often introduce security flaws or
529   interoperability problems by violating HTTP semantics.  For example, an
530   "<x:dfn>interception proxy</x:dfn>" <xref target="RFC3040"/> (also commonly
531   known as a "<x:dfn>transparent proxy</x:dfn>" <xref target="RFC1919"/> or
532   "<x:dfn>captive portal</x:dfn>")
533   differs from an HTTP proxy because it is not selected by the client.
534   Instead, an interception proxy filters or redirects outgoing TCP port 80
535   packets (and occasionally other common port traffic).
536   Interception proxies are commonly found on public network access points,
537   as a means of enforcing account subscription prior to allowing use of
538   non-local Internet services, and within corporate firewalls to enforce
539   network usage policies.
540   They are indistinguishable from a man-in-the-middle attack.
541</t>
542<t>
543   HTTP is defined as a stateless protocol, meaning that each request message
544   can be understood in isolation.  Many implementations depend on HTTP's
545   stateless design in order to reuse proxied connections or dynamically
546   load balance requests across multiple servers.  Hence, servers &MUST-NOT;
547   assume that two requests on the same connection are from the same user
548   agent unless the connection is secured and specific to that agent.
549   Some non-standard HTTP extensions (e.g., <xref target="RFC4559"/>) have
550   been known to violate this requirement, resulting in security and
551   interoperability problems.
552</t>
553</section>
554
555<section title="Caches" anchor="caches">
556<iref primary="true" item="cache"/>
557<t>
558   A "<x:dfn>cache</x:dfn>" is a local store of previous response messages and the
559   subsystem that controls its message storage, retrieval, and deletion.
560   A cache stores cacheable responses in order to reduce the response
561   time and network bandwidth consumption on future, equivalent
562   requests. Any client or server &MAY; employ a cache, though a cache
563   cannot be used by a server while it is acting as a tunnel.
564</t>
565<t>
566   The effect of a cache is that the request/response chain is shortened
567   if one of the participants along the chain has a cached response
568   applicable to that request. The following illustrates the resulting
569   chain if B has a cached copy of an earlier response from O (via C)
570   for a request which has not been cached by UA or A.
571</t>
572<figure><artwork type="drawing">
573            &gt;             &gt;
574       <x:highlight>UA</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>A</x:highlight> =========== <x:highlight>B</x:highlight> - - - - - - <x:highlight>C</x:highlight> - - - - - - <x:highlight>O</x:highlight>
575                  &lt;             &lt;
576</artwork></figure>
577<t><iref primary="true" item="cacheable"/>
578   A response is "<x:dfn>cacheable</x:dfn>" if a cache is allowed to store a copy of
579   the response message for use in answering subsequent requests.
580   Even when a response is cacheable, there might be additional
581   constraints placed by the client or by the origin server on when
582   that cached response can be used for a particular request. HTTP
583   requirements for cache behavior and cacheable responses are
584   defined in &caching-overview;
585</t>
586<t>
587   There are a wide variety of architectures and configurations
588   of caches and proxies deployed across the World Wide Web and
589   inside large organizations. These systems include national hierarchies
590   of proxy caches to save transoceanic bandwidth, systems that
591   broadcast or multicast cache entries, organizations that distribute
592   subsets of cached data via optical media, and so on.
593</t>
594</section>
595
596<section title="Conformance and Error Handling" anchor="intro.conformance.and.error.handling">
597<t>
598   This specification targets conformance criteria according to the role of
599   a participant in HTTP communication.  Hence, HTTP requirements are placed
600   on senders, recipients, clients, servers, user agents, intermediaries,
601   origin servers, proxies, gateways, or caches, depending on what behavior
602   is being constrained by the requirement. The verb "generate" is used
603   instead of "send" where a requirement differentiates between creating a
604   protocol element and merely forwarding a received element downstream.
605</t>
606<t>
607   An implementation is considered conformant if it complies with all of the
608   requirements associated with the roles it partakes in HTTP.
609</t>
610<t>
611   A sender &MUST-NOT; generate protocol elements that do not match
612   the grammar defined by the ABNF rules for those protocol elements that
613   are applicable to the sender's role.
614   If a received protocol element is processed, the recipient &MUST; be able
615   to parse any value that would match the ABNF rules for that protocol
616   element, excluding only those rules not applicable to the recipient's role.
617</t>
618<t>
619   Unless noted otherwise, a recipient &MAY; attempt to recover a usable
620   protocol element from an invalid construct.  HTTP does not define
621   specific error handling mechanisms except when they have a direct impact
622   on security, since different applications of the protocol require
623   different error handling strategies.  For example, a Web browser might
624   wish to transparently recover from a response where the <x:ref>Location</x:ref>
625   header field doesn't parse according to the ABNF, whereas a systems control
626   client might consider any form of error recovery to be dangerous.
627</t>
628</section>
629
630<section title="Protocol Versioning" anchor="http.version">
631  <x:anchor-alias value="HTTP-version"/>
632  <x:anchor-alias value="HTTP-name"/>
633<t>
634   HTTP uses a "&lt;major&gt;.&lt;minor&gt;" numbering scheme to indicate
635   versions of the protocol. This specification defines version "1.1".
636   The protocol version as a whole indicates the sender's conformance
637   with the set of requirements laid out in that version's corresponding
638   specification of HTTP.
639</t>
640<t>
641   The version of an HTTP message is indicated by an HTTP-version field
642   in the first line of the message. HTTP-version is case-sensitive.
643</t>
644<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HTTP-version"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HTTP-name"/>
645  <x:ref>HTTP-version</x:ref>  = <x:ref>HTTP-name</x:ref> "/" <x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref> "." <x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref>
646  <x:ref>HTTP-name</x:ref>     = <x:abnf-char-sequence>"HTTP"</x:abnf-char-sequence> ; "HTTP", case-sensitive
647</artwork></figure>
648<t>
649   The HTTP version number consists of two decimal digits separated by a "."
650   (period or decimal point).  The first digit ("major version") indicates the
651   HTTP messaging syntax, whereas the second digit ("minor version") indicates
652   the highest minor version to which the sender is
653   conformant and able to understand for future communication.  The minor
654   version advertises the sender's communication capabilities even when the
655   sender is only using a backwards-compatible subset of the protocol,
656   thereby letting the recipient know that more advanced features can
657   be used in response (by servers) or in future requests (by clients).
658</t>
659<t>
660   When an HTTP/1.1 message is sent to an HTTP/1.0 recipient
661   <xref target="RFC1945"/> or a recipient whose version is unknown,
662   the HTTP/1.1 message is constructed such that it can be interpreted
663   as a valid HTTP/1.0 message if all of the newer features are ignored.
664   This specification places recipient-version requirements on some
665   new features so that a conformant sender will only use compatible
666   features until it has determined, through configuration or the
667   receipt of a message, that the recipient supports HTTP/1.1.
668</t>
669<t>
670   The interpretation of a header field does not change between minor
671   versions of the same major HTTP version, though the default
672   behavior of a recipient in the absence of such a field can change.
673   Unless specified otherwise, header fields defined in HTTP/1.1 are
674   defined for all versions of HTTP/1.x.  In particular, the <x:ref>Host</x:ref>
675   and <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header fields ought to be implemented by all
676   HTTP/1.x implementations whether or not they advertise conformance with
677   HTTP/1.1.
678</t>
679<t>
680   New header fields can be defined such that, when they are
681   understood by a recipient, they might override or enhance the
682   interpretation of previously defined header fields.  When an
683   implementation receives an unrecognized header field, the recipient
684   &MUST; ignore that header field for local processing regardless of
685   the message's HTTP version.  An unrecognized header field received
686   by a proxy &MUST; be forwarded downstream unless the header field's
687   field-name is listed in the message's <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field
688   (see <xref target="header.connection"/>).
689   These requirements allow HTTP's functionality to be enhanced without
690   requiring prior update of deployed intermediaries.
691</t>
692<t>
693   Intermediaries that process HTTP messages (i.e., all intermediaries
694   other than those acting as tunnels) &MUST; send their own HTTP-version
695   in forwarded messages.  In other words, they &MUST-NOT; blindly
696   forward the first line of an HTTP message without ensuring that the
697   protocol version in that message matches a version to which that
698   intermediary is conformant for both the receiving and
699   sending of messages.  Forwarding an HTTP message without rewriting
700   the HTTP-version might result in communication errors when downstream
701   recipients use the message sender's version to determine what features
702   are safe to use for later communication with that sender.
703</t>
704<t>
705   An HTTP client &SHOULD; send a request version equal to the highest
706   version to which the client is conformant and
707   whose major version is no higher than the highest version supported
708   by the server, if this is known.  An HTTP client &MUST-NOT; send a
709   version to which it is not conformant.
710</t>
711<t>
712   An HTTP client &MAY; send a lower request version if it is known that
713   the server incorrectly implements the HTTP specification, but only
714   after the client has attempted at least one normal request and determined
715   from the response status or header fields (e.g., <x:ref>Server</x:ref>) that
716   the server improperly handles higher request versions.
717</t>
718<t>
719   An HTTP server &SHOULD; send a response version equal to the highest
720   version to which the server is conformant and
721   whose major version is less than or equal to the one received in the
722   request.  An HTTP server &MUST-NOT; send a version to which it is not
723   conformant.  A server &MAY; send a <x:ref>505 (HTTP Version Not
724   Supported)</x:ref> response if it cannot send a response using the
725   major version used in the client's request.
726</t>
727<t>
728   An HTTP server &MAY; send an HTTP/1.0 response to an HTTP/1.0 request
729   if it is known or suspected that the client incorrectly implements the
730   HTTP specification and is incapable of correctly processing later
731   version responses, such as when a client fails to parse the version
732   number correctly or when an intermediary is known to blindly forward
733   the HTTP-version even when it doesn't conform to the given minor
734   version of the protocol. Such protocol downgrades &SHOULD-NOT; be
735   performed unless triggered by specific client attributes, such as when
736   one or more of the request header fields (e.g., <x:ref>User-Agent</x:ref>)
737   uniquely match the values sent by a client known to be in error.
738</t>
739<t>
740   The intention of HTTP's versioning design is that the major number
741   will only be incremented if an incompatible message syntax is
742   introduced, and that the minor number will only be incremented when
743   changes made to the protocol have the effect of adding to the message
744   semantics or implying additional capabilities of the sender.  However,
745   the minor version was not incremented for the changes introduced between
746   <xref target="RFC2068"/> and <xref target="RFC2616"/>, and this revision
747   is specifically avoiding any such changes to the protocol.
748</t>
749</section>
750
751<section title="Uniform Resource Identifiers" anchor="uri">
752<iref primary="true" item="resource"/>
753<t>
754   Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) <xref target="RFC3986"/> are used
755   throughout HTTP as the means for identifying resources. URI references
756   are used to target requests, indicate redirects, and define relationships.
757   HTTP does not limit what a resource might be; it merely defines an interface
758   that can be used to interact with a resource via HTTP. More information on
759   the scope of URIs and resources can be found in <xref target="RFC3986"/>.
760</t>
761  <x:anchor-alias value="URI-reference"/>
762  <x:anchor-alias value="absolute-URI"/>
763  <x:anchor-alias value="relative-part"/>
764  <x:anchor-alias value="authority"/>
765  <x:anchor-alias value="path-abempty"/>
766  <x:anchor-alias value="path-absolute"/>
767  <x:anchor-alias value="port"/>
768  <x:anchor-alias value="query"/>
769  <x:anchor-alias value="uri-host"/>
770  <x:anchor-alias value="partial-URI"/>
771<t>
772   This specification adopts the definitions of "URI-reference",
773   "absolute-URI", "relative-part", "port", "host",
774   "path-abempty", "path-absolute", "query", and "authority" from the
775   URI generic syntax <xref target="RFC3986"/>.
776   In addition, we define a partial-URI rule for protocol elements
777   that allow a relative URI but not a fragment.
778</t>
779<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="URI-reference"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="absolute-URI"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="authority"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="path-absolute"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="port"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="query"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="uri-host"/>
780  <x:ref>URI-reference</x:ref> = &lt;URI-reference, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="4.1"/>&gt;
781  <x:ref>absolute-URI</x:ref>  = &lt;absolute-URI, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="4.3"/>&gt;
782  <x:ref>relative-part</x:ref> = &lt;relative-part, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="4.2"/>&gt;
783  <x:ref>authority</x:ref>     = &lt;authority, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2"/>&gt;
784  <x:ref>path-abempty</x:ref>  = &lt;path-abempty, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.3"/>&gt;
785  <x:ref>path-absolute</x:ref> = &lt;path-absolute, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.3"/>&gt;
786  <x:ref>port</x:ref>          = &lt;port, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2.3"/>&gt;
787  <x:ref>query</x:ref>         = &lt;query, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.4"/>&gt;
788  <x:ref>uri-host</x:ref>      = &lt;host, defined in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2.2"/>&gt;
789 
790  <x:ref>partial-URI</x:ref>   = relative-part [ "?" query ]
791</artwork></figure>
792<t>
793   Each protocol element in HTTP that allows a URI reference will indicate
794   in its ABNF production whether the element allows any form of reference
795   (URI-reference), only a URI in absolute form (absolute-URI), only the
796   path and optional query components, or some combination of the above.
797   Unless otherwise indicated, URI references are parsed
798   relative to the effective request URI
799   (<xref target="effective.request.uri"/>).
800</t>
801
802<section title="http URI scheme" anchor="http.uri">
803  <x:anchor-alias value="http-URI"/>
804  <iref item="http URI scheme" primary="true"/>
805  <iref item="URI scheme" subitem="http" primary="true"/>
806<t>
807   The "http" URI scheme is hereby defined for the purpose of minting
808   identifiers according to their association with the hierarchical
809   namespace governed by a potential HTTP origin server listening for
810   TCP connections on a given port.
811</t>
812<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="http-URI"/>
813  <x:ref>http-URI</x:ref> = "http:" "//" <x:ref>authority</x:ref> <x:ref>path-abempty</x:ref> [ "?" <x:ref>query</x:ref> ]
814</artwork></figure>
815<t>
816   The HTTP origin server is identified by the generic syntax's
817   <x:ref>authority</x:ref> component, which includes a host identifier
818   and optional TCP port (<xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2.2"/>).
819   The remainder of the URI, consisting of both the hierarchical path
820   component and optional query component, serves as an identifier for
821   a potential resource within that origin server's name space.
822</t>
823<t>
824   If the host identifier is provided as an IP literal or IPv4 address,
825   then the origin server is any listener on the indicated TCP port at
826   that IP address. If host is a registered name, then that name is
827   considered an indirect identifier and the recipient might use a name
828   resolution service, such as DNS, to find the address of a listener
829   for that host.
830   The host &MUST-NOT; be empty; if an "http" URI is received with an
831   empty host, then it &MUST; be rejected as invalid.
832   If the port subcomponent is empty or not given, then TCP port 80 is
833   assumed (the default reserved port for WWW services).
834</t>
835<t>
836   Regardless of the form of host identifier, access to that host is not
837   implied by the mere presence of its name or address. The host might or might
838   not exist and, even when it does exist, might or might not be running an
839   HTTP server or listening to the indicated port. The "http" URI scheme
840   makes use of the delegated nature of Internet names and addresses to
841   establish a naming authority (whatever entity has the ability to place
842   an HTTP server at that Internet name or address) and allows that
843   authority to determine which names are valid and how they might be used.
844</t>
845<t>
846   When an "http" URI is used within a context that calls for access to the
847   indicated resource, a client &MAY; attempt access by resolving
848   the host to an IP address, establishing a TCP connection to that address
849   on the indicated port, and sending an HTTP request message
850   (<xref target="http.message"/>) containing the URI's identifying data
851   (<xref target="message.routing"/>) to the server.
852   If the server responds to that request with a non-interim HTTP response
853   message, as described in &status-codes;, then that response
854   is considered an authoritative answer to the client's request.
855</t>
856<t>
857   Although HTTP is independent of the transport protocol, the "http"
858   scheme is specific to TCP-based services because the name delegation
859   process depends on TCP for establishing authority.
860   An HTTP service based on some other underlying connection protocol
861   would presumably be identified using a different URI scheme, just as
862   the "https" scheme (below) is used for servers that require an SSL/TLS
863   transport layer on a connection. Other protocols might also be used to
864   provide access to "http" identified resources &mdash; it is only the
865   authoritative interface used for mapping the namespace that is
866   specific to TCP.
867</t>
868<t>
869   The URI generic syntax for authority also includes a deprecated
870   userinfo subcomponent (<xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.2.1"/>)
871   for including user authentication information in the URI.  Some
872   implementations make use of the userinfo component for internal
873   configuration of authentication information, such as within command
874   invocation options, configuration files, or bookmark lists, even
875   though such usage might expose a user identifier or password.
876   Senders &MUST-NOT; include a userinfo subcomponent (and its "@"
877   delimiter) when transmitting an "http" URI in a message.  Recipients
878   of HTTP messages that contain a URI reference &SHOULD; parse for the
879   existence of userinfo and treat its presence as an error, likely
880   indicating that the deprecated subcomponent is being used to obscure
881   the authority for the sake of phishing attacks.
882</t>
883</section>
884
885<section title="https URI scheme" anchor="https.uri">
886   <x:anchor-alias value="https-URI"/>
887   <iref item="https URI scheme"/>
888   <iref item="URI scheme" subitem="https"/>
889<t>
890   The "https" URI scheme is hereby defined for the purpose of minting
891   identifiers according to their association with the hierarchical
892   namespace governed by a potential HTTP origin server listening for
893   SSL/TLS-secured connections on a given TCP port.
894</t>
895<t>
896   All of the requirements listed above for the "http" scheme are also
897   requirements for the "https" scheme, except that a default TCP port
898   of 443 is assumed if the port subcomponent is empty or not given,
899   and the TCP connection &MUST; be secured for privacy through the
900   use of strong encryption prior to sending the first HTTP request.
901</t>
902<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="https-URI"/>
903  <x:ref>https-URI</x:ref> = "https:" "//" <x:ref>authority</x:ref> <x:ref>path-abempty</x:ref> [ "?" <x:ref>query</x:ref> ]
904</artwork></figure>
905<t>
906   Unlike the "http" scheme, responses to "https" identified requests
907   are never "public" and thus &MUST-NOT; be reused for shared caching.
908   They can, however, be reused in a private cache if the message is
909   cacheable by default in HTTP or specifically indicated as such by
910   the Cache-Control header field (&header-cache-control;).
911</t>
912<t>
913   Resources made available via the "https" scheme have no shared
914   identity with the "http" scheme even if their resource identifiers
915   indicate the same authority (the same host listening to the same
916   TCP port).  They are distinct name spaces and are considered to be
917   distinct origin servers.  However, an extension to HTTP that is
918   defined to apply to entire host domains, such as the Cookie protocol
919   <xref target="RFC6265"/>, can allow information
920   set by one service to impact communication with other services
921   within a matching group of host domains.
922</t>
923<t>
924   The process for authoritative access to an "https" identified
925   resource is defined in <xref target="RFC2818"/>.
926</t>
927</section>
928
929<section title="http and https URI Normalization and Comparison" anchor="uri.comparison">
930<t>
931   Since the "http" and "https" schemes conform to the URI generic syntax,
932   such URIs are normalized and compared according to the algorithm defined
933   in <xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="6"/>, using the defaults
934   described above for each scheme.
935</t>
936<t>
937   If the port is equal to the default port for a scheme, the normal
938   form is to elide the port subcomponent. Likewise, an empty path
939   component is equivalent to an absolute path of "/", so the normal
940   form is to provide a path of "/" instead. The scheme and host
941   are case-insensitive and normally provided in lowercase; all
942   other components are compared in a case-sensitive manner.
943   Characters other than those in the "reserved" set are equivalent
944   to their percent-encoded octets (see <xref target="RFC3986"
945   x:fmt="," x:sec="2.1"/>): the normal form is to not encode them.
946</t>
947<t>
948   For example, the following three URIs are equivalent:
949</t>
950<figure><artwork type="example">
951   http://example.com:80/~smith/home.html
952   http://EXAMPLE.com/%7Esmith/home.html
953   http://EXAMPLE.com:/%7esmith/home.html
954</artwork></figure>
955</section>
956</section>
957</section>
958
959<section title="Message Format" anchor="http.message">
960<x:anchor-alias value="generic-message"/>
961<x:anchor-alias value="message.types"/>
962<x:anchor-alias value="HTTP-message"/>
963<x:anchor-alias value="start-line"/>
964<iref item="header section"/>
965<iref item="headers"/>
966<iref item="header field"/>
967<t>
968   All HTTP/1.1 messages consist of a start-line followed by a sequence of
969   octets in a format similar to the Internet Message Format
970   <xref target="RFC5322"/>: zero or more header fields (collectively
971   referred to as the "headers" or the "header section"), an empty line
972   indicating the end of the header section, and an optional message body.
973</t>
974<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="HTTP-message"/>
975  <x:ref>HTTP-message</x:ref>   = <x:ref>start-line</x:ref>
976                   *( <x:ref>header-field</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref> )
977                   <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
978                   [ <x:ref>message-body</x:ref> ]
979</artwork></figure>
980<t>
981   The normal procedure for parsing an HTTP message is to read the
982   start-line into a structure, read each header field into a hash
983   table by field name until the empty line, and then use the parsed
984   data to determine if a message body is expected.  If a message body
985   has been indicated, then it is read as a stream until an amount
986   of octets equal to the message body length is read or the connection
987   is closed.
988</t>
989<t>
990   Recipients &MUST; parse an HTTP message as a sequence of octets in an
991   encoding that is a superset of US-ASCII <xref target="USASCII"/>.
992   Parsing an HTTP message as a stream of Unicode characters, without regard
993   for the specific encoding, creates security vulnerabilities due to the
994   varying ways that string processing libraries handle invalid multibyte
995   character sequences that contain the octet LF (%x0A).  String-based
996   parsers can only be safely used within protocol elements after the element
997   has been extracted from the message, such as within a header field-value
998   after message parsing has delineated the individual fields.
999</t>
1000<t>
1001   An HTTP message can be parsed as a stream for incremental processing or
1002   forwarding downstream.  However, recipients cannot rely on incremental
1003   delivery of partial messages, since some implementations will buffer or
1004   delay message forwarding for the sake of network efficiency, security
1005   checks, or payload transformations.
1006</t>
1007
1008<section title="Start Line" anchor="start.line">
1009  <x:anchor-alias value="Start-Line"/>
1010<t>
1011   An HTTP message can either be a request from client to server or a
1012   response from server to client.  Syntactically, the two types of message
1013   differ only in the start-line, which is either a request-line (for requests)
1014   or a status-line (for responses), and in the algorithm for determining
1015   the length of the message body (<xref target="message.body"/>).
1016   In theory, a client could receive requests and a server could receive
1017   responses, distinguishing them by their different start-line formats,
1018   but in practice servers are implemented to only expect a request
1019   (a response is interpreted as an unknown or invalid request method)
1020   and clients are implemented to only expect a response.
1021</t>
1022<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="start-line"/>
1023  <x:ref>start-line</x:ref>     = <x:ref>request-line</x:ref> / <x:ref>status-line</x:ref>
1024</artwork></figure>
1025<t>
1026   Implementations &MUST-NOT; send whitespace between the start-line and
1027   the first header field. The presence of such whitespace in a request
1028   might be an attempt to trick a server into ignoring that field or
1029   processing the line after it as a new request, either of which might
1030   result in a security vulnerability if other implementations within
1031   the request chain interpret the same message differently.
1032   Likewise, the presence of such whitespace in a response might be
1033   ignored by some clients or cause others to cease parsing.
1034</t>
1035
1036<section title="Request Line" anchor="request.line">
1037  <x:anchor-alias value="Request"/>
1038  <x:anchor-alias value="request-line"/>
1039<t>
1040   A request-line begins with a method token, followed by a single
1041   space (SP), the request-target, another single space (SP), the
1042   protocol version, and ending with CRLF.
1043</t>
1044<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="request-line"/>
1045  <x:ref>request-line</x:ref>   = <x:ref>method</x:ref> <x:ref>SP</x:ref> <x:ref>request-target</x:ref> <x:ref>SP</x:ref> <x:ref>HTTP-version</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1046</artwork></figure>
1047<t>
1048   A server &MUST; be able to parse any received message that begins
1049   with a request-line and matches the ABNF rule for HTTP-message.
1050</t>
1051<iref primary="true" item="method"/>
1052<t anchor="method">
1053   The method token indicates the request method to be performed on the
1054   target resource. The request method is case-sensitive.
1055</t>
1056<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="method"/>
1057  <x:ref>method</x:ref>         = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
1058</artwork></figure>
1059<t>
1060   The methods defined by this specification can be found in
1061   &methods;, along with information regarding the HTTP method registry
1062   and considerations for defining new methods.
1063</t>
1064<iref item="request-target"/>
1065<t>
1066   The request-target identifies the target resource upon which to apply
1067   the request, as defined in <xref target="request-target"/>.
1068</t>
1069<t>
1070   No whitespace is allowed inside the method, request-target, and
1071   protocol version.  Hence, recipients typically parse the request-line
1072   into its component parts by splitting on the SP characters.
1073</t>
1074<t>
1075   Unfortunately, some user agents fail to properly encode hypertext
1076   references that have embedded whitespace, sending the characters
1077   directly instead of properly percent-encoding the disallowed characters.
1078   Recipients of an invalid request-line &SHOULD; respond with either a
1079   <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> error or a <x:ref>301 (Moved Permanently)</x:ref>
1080   redirect with the request-target properly encoded.  Recipients &SHOULD-NOT;
1081   attempt to autocorrect and then process the request without a redirect,
1082   since the invalid request-line might be deliberately crafted to bypass
1083   security filters along the request chain.
1084</t>
1085<t>
1086   HTTP does not place a pre-defined limit on the length of a request-line.
1087   A server that receives a method longer than any that it implements
1088   &SHOULD; respond with either a <x:ref>405 (Method Not Allowed)</x:ref>, if it is an origin
1089   server, or a <x:ref>501 (Not Implemented)</x:ref> status code.
1090   A server &MUST; be prepared to receive URIs of unbounded length and
1091   respond with the <x:ref>414 (URI Too Long)</x:ref> status code if the received
1092   request-target would be longer than the server wishes to handle
1093   (see &status-414;).
1094</t>
1095<t>
1096   Various ad-hoc limitations on request-line length are found in practice.
1097   It is &RECOMMENDED; that all HTTP senders and recipients support, at a
1098   minimum, request-line lengths of up to 8000 octets.
1099</t>
1100</section>
1101
1102<section title="Status Line" anchor="status.line">
1103  <x:anchor-alias value="response"/>
1104  <x:anchor-alias value="status-line"/>
1105<t>
1106   The first line of a response message is the status-line, consisting
1107   of the protocol version, a space (SP), the status code, another space,
1108   a possibly-empty textual phrase describing the status code, and
1109   ending with CRLF.
1110</t>
1111<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="status-line"/>
1112  <x:ref>status-line</x:ref> = <x:ref>HTTP-version</x:ref> <x:ref>SP</x:ref> <x:ref>status-code</x:ref> <x:ref>SP</x:ref> <x:ref>reason-phrase</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1113</artwork></figure>
1114<t>
1115   A client &MUST; be able to parse any received message that begins
1116   with a status-line and matches the ABNF rule for HTTP-message.
1117</t>
1118
1119<t anchor="status-code">
1120   The status-code element is a 3-digit integer result code of the attempt to
1121   understand and satisfy the request. See &status-codes; for
1122   further information, such as the list of status codes defined by this
1123   specification, the IANA registry, and considerations for new status codes.
1124</t>
1125<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="status-code"/>
1126  <x:ref>status-code</x:ref>    = 3<x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref>
1127</artwork></figure>
1128
1129<t anchor="reason-phrase">   
1130   The reason-phrase element exists for the sole purpose of providing a
1131   textual description associated with the numeric status code, mostly
1132   out of deference to earlier Internet application protocols that were more
1133   frequently used with interactive text clients. A client &SHOULD; ignore
1134   the reason-phrase content.
1135</t>
1136<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="reason-phrase"/>
1137  <x:ref>reason-phrase</x:ref>  = *( <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> )
1138</artwork></figure>
1139</section>
1140</section>
1141
1142<section title="Header Fields" anchor="header.fields">
1143  <x:anchor-alias value="header-field"/>
1144  <x:anchor-alias value="field-content"/>
1145  <x:anchor-alias value="field-name"/>
1146  <x:anchor-alias value="field-value"/>
1147  <x:anchor-alias value="obs-fold"/>
1148<t>
1149   Each HTTP header field consists of a case-insensitive field name
1150   followed by a colon (":"), optional whitespace, and the field value.
1151</t>
1152<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="header-field"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="field-name"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="field-value"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="field-content"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="obs-fold"/>
1153  <x:ref>header-field</x:ref>   = <x:ref>field-name</x:ref> ":" <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> <x:ref>field-value</x:ref> <x:ref>BWS</x:ref>
1154  <x:ref>field-name</x:ref>     = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
1155  <x:ref>field-value</x:ref>    = *( <x:ref>field-content</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-fold</x:ref> )
1156  <x:ref>field-content</x:ref>  = *( <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> )
1157  <x:ref>obs-fold</x:ref>       = <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref> ( <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> )
1158                 ; obsolete line folding
1159                 ; see <xref target="field.parsing"/>
1160</artwork></figure>
1161<t>
1162   The field-name token labels the corresponding field-value as having the
1163   semantics defined by that header field.  For example, the <x:ref>Date</x:ref>
1164   header field is defined in &header-date; as containing the origination
1165   timestamp for the message in which it appears.
1166</t>
1167<t>
1168   HTTP header fields are fully extensible: there is no limit on the
1169   introduction of new field names, each presumably defining new semantics,
1170   or on the number of header fields used in a given message.  Existing
1171   fields are defined in each part of this specification and in many other
1172   specifications outside the standards process.
1173   New header fields can be introduced without changing the protocol version
1174   if their defined semantics allow them to be safely ignored by recipients
1175   that do not recognize them.
1176</t>
1177<t>
1178   New HTTP header fields &SHOULD; be registered with IANA according
1179   to the procedures in &cons-new-header-fields;.
1180   Unrecognized header fields &MUST; be forwarded by a proxy unless the
1181   field-name is listed in the <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field
1182   (<xref target="header.connection"/>) or the proxy is specifically
1183   configured to block or otherwise transform such fields.
1184   Unrecognized header fields &SHOULD; be ignored by other recipients.
1185</t>
1186<t>
1187   The order in which header fields with differing field names are
1188   received is not significant. However, it is "good practice" to send
1189   header fields that contain control data first, such as <x:ref>Host</x:ref>
1190   on requests and <x:ref>Date</x:ref> on responses, so that implementations
1191   can decide when not to handle a message as early as possible.  A server
1192   &MUST; wait until the entire header section is received before interpreting
1193   a request message, since later header fields might include conditionals,
1194   authentication credentials, or deliberately misleading duplicate
1195   header fields that would impact request processing.
1196</t>
1197<t>
1198   Multiple header fields with the same field name &MUST-NOT; be
1199   sent in a message unless the entire field value for that
1200   header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)].
1201   Multiple header fields with the same field name can be combined into
1202   one "field-name: field-value" pair, without changing the semantics of the
1203   message, by appending each subsequent field value to the combined
1204   field value in order, separated by a comma. The order in which
1205   header fields with the same field name are received is therefore
1206   significant to the interpretation of the combined field value;
1207   a proxy &MUST-NOT; change the order of these field values when
1208   forwarding a message.
1209</t>
1210<x:note>
1211  <t>
1212   &Note; The "Set-Cookie" header field as implemented in
1213   practice can occur multiple times, but does not use the list syntax, and
1214   thus cannot be combined into a single line (<xref target="RFC6265"/>). (See Appendix A.2.3 of <xref target="Kri2001"/>
1215   for details.) Also note that the Set-Cookie2 header field specified in
1216   <xref target="RFC2965"/> does not share this problem.
1217  </t>
1218</x:note>
1219
1220<section title="Whitespace" anchor="whitespace">
1221<t anchor="rule.LWS">
1222   This specification uses three rules to denote the use of linear
1223   whitespace: OWS (optional whitespace), RWS (required whitespace), and
1224   BWS ("bad" whitespace).
1225</t>
1226<t anchor="rule.OWS">
1227   The OWS rule is used where zero or more linear whitespace octets might
1228   appear. OWS &SHOULD; either not be produced or be produced as a single
1229   SP. Multiple OWS octets that occur within field-content &SHOULD; either
1230   be replaced with a single SP or transformed to all SP octets (each
1231   octet other than SP replaced with SP) before interpreting the field value
1232   or forwarding the message downstream.
1233</t>
1234<t anchor="rule.RWS">
1235   RWS is used when at least one linear whitespace octet is required to
1236   separate field tokens. RWS &SHOULD; be produced as a single SP.
1237   Multiple RWS octets that occur within field-content &SHOULD; either
1238   be replaced with a single SP or transformed to all SP octets before
1239   interpreting the field value or forwarding the message downstream.
1240</t>
1241<t anchor="rule.BWS">
1242   BWS is used where the grammar allows optional whitespace for historical
1243   reasons but senders &SHOULD-NOT; produce it in messages. HTTP/1.1
1244   recipients &MUST; accept such bad optional whitespace and remove it before
1245   interpreting the field value or forwarding the message downstream.
1246</t>
1247<t anchor="rule.whitespace">
1248  <x:anchor-alias value="BWS"/>
1249  <x:anchor-alias value="OWS"/>
1250  <x:anchor-alias value="RWS"/>
1251</t>
1252<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="OWS"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="RWS"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="BWS"/>
1253  <x:ref>OWS</x:ref>            = *( <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> )
1254                 ; "optional" whitespace
1255  <x:ref>RWS</x:ref>            = 1*( <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> )
1256                 ; "required" whitespace
1257  <x:ref>BWS</x:ref>            = <x:ref>OWS</x:ref>
1258                 ; "bad" whitespace
1259</artwork></figure>
1260</section>
1261
1262<section title="Field Parsing" anchor="field.parsing">
1263<t>
1264   No whitespace is allowed between the header field-name and colon.
1265   In the past, differences in the handling of such whitespace have led to
1266   security vulnerabilities in request routing and response handling.
1267   Any received request message that contains whitespace between a header
1268   field-name and colon &MUST; be rejected with a response code of 400
1269   (Bad Request).  A proxy &MUST; remove any such whitespace from a response
1270   message before forwarding the message downstream.
1271</t>
1272<t>
1273   A field value &MAY; be preceded by optional whitespace (OWS); a single SP is
1274   preferred. The field value does not include any leading or trailing white
1275   space: OWS occurring before the first non-whitespace octet of the
1276   field value or after the last non-whitespace octet of the field value
1277   is ignored and &SHOULD; be removed before further processing (as this does
1278   not change the meaning of the header field).
1279</t>
1280<t>
1281   Historically, HTTP header field values could be extended over multiple
1282   lines by preceding each extra line with at least one space or horizontal
1283   tab (obs-fold). This specification deprecates such line
1284   folding except within the message/http media type
1285   (<xref target="internet.media.type.message.http"/>).
1286   HTTP senders &MUST-NOT; produce messages that include line folding
1287   (i.e., that contain any field-value that matches the obs-fold rule) unless
1288   the message is intended for packaging within the message/http media type.
1289   HTTP recipients &SHOULD; accept line folding and replace any embedded
1290   obs-fold whitespace with either a single SP or a matching number of SP
1291   octets (to avoid buffer copying) prior to interpreting the field value or
1292   forwarding the message downstream.
1293</t>
1294<t>
1295   Historically, HTTP has allowed field content with text in the ISO-8859-1
1296   <xref target="ISO-8859-1"/> character encoding and supported other
1297   character sets only through use of <xref target="RFC2047"/> encoding.
1298   In practice, most HTTP header field values use only a subset of the
1299   US-ASCII character encoding <xref target="USASCII"/>. Newly defined
1300   header fields &SHOULD; limit their field values to US-ASCII octets.
1301   Recipients &SHOULD; treat other (obs-text) octets in field content as
1302   opaque data.
1303</t>
1304</section>
1305
1306<section title="Field Length" anchor="field.length">
1307<t>
1308   HTTP does not place a pre-defined limit on the length of header fields,
1309   either in isolation or as a set. A server &MUST; be prepared to receive
1310   request header fields of unbounded length and respond with a <x:ref>4xx
1311   (Client Error)</x:ref> status code if the received header field(s) would be
1312   longer than the server wishes to handle.
1313</t>
1314<t>
1315   A client that receives response headers that are longer than it wishes to
1316   handle can only treat it as a server error.
1317</t>
1318<t>
1319   Various ad-hoc limitations on header length are found in practice. It is
1320   &RECOMMENDED; that all HTTP senders and recipients support messages whose
1321   combined header fields have 4000 or more octets.
1322</t>
1323</section>
1324
1325<section title="Field value components" anchor="field.components">
1326<t anchor="rule.token.separators">
1327  <x:anchor-alias value="tchar"/>
1328  <x:anchor-alias value="token"/>
1329  <x:anchor-alias value="special"/>
1330  <x:anchor-alias value="word"/>
1331   Many HTTP/1.1 header field values consist of words (token or quoted-string)
1332   separated by whitespace or special characters. These special characters
1333   &MUST; be in a quoted string to be used within a parameter value (as defined
1334   in <xref target="transfer.codings"/>).
1335</t>
1336<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="word"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="token"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="tchar"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="special"/>
1337  <x:ref>word</x:ref>           = <x:ref>token</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-string</x:ref>
1338
1339  <x:ref>token</x:ref>          = 1*<x:ref>tchar</x:ref>
1340<!--
1341  IMPORTANT: when editing "tchar" make sure that "special" is updated accordingly!!!
1342 -->
1343  <x:ref>tchar</x:ref>          = "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&amp;" / "'" / "*"
1344                 / "+" / "-" / "." / "^" / "_" / "`" / "|" / "~"
1345                 / <x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref> / <x:ref>ALPHA</x:ref>
1346                 ; any <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref>, except <x:ref>special</x:ref>
1347
1348  <x:ref>special</x:ref>        = "(" / ")" / "&lt;" / ">" / "@" / ","
1349                 / ";" / ":" / "\" / DQUOTE / "/" / "["
1350                 / "]" / "?" / "=" / "{" / "}"
1351</artwork></figure>
1352<t anchor="rule.quoted-string">
1353  <x:anchor-alias value="quoted-string"/>
1354  <x:anchor-alias value="qdtext"/>
1355  <x:anchor-alias value="obs-text"/>
1356   A string of text is parsed as a single word if it is quoted using
1357   double-quote marks.
1358</t>
1359<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="quoted-string"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="qdtext"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="obs-text"/>
1360  <x:ref>quoted-string</x:ref>  = <x:ref>DQUOTE</x:ref> *( <x:ref>qdtext</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-pair</x:ref> ) <x:ref>DQUOTE</x:ref>
1361  <x:ref>qdtext</x:ref>         = <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> / %x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref>
1362  <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref>       = %x80-FF
1363</artwork></figure>
1364<t anchor="rule.quoted-pair">
1365  <x:anchor-alias value="quoted-pair"/>
1366   The backslash octet ("\") can be used as a single-octet
1367   quoting mechanism within quoted-string constructs:
1368</t>
1369<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="quoted-pair"/>
1370  <x:ref>quoted-pair</x:ref>    = "\" ( <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> )
1371</artwork></figure>
1372<t>
1373   Recipients that process the value of the quoted-string &MUST; handle a
1374   quoted-pair as if it were replaced by the octet following the backslash.
1375</t>
1376<t>
1377   Senders &SHOULD-NOT; escape octets in quoted-strings that do not require
1378   escaping (i.e., other than DQUOTE and the backslash octet).
1379</t>
1380<t anchor="rule.comment">
1381  <x:anchor-alias value="comment"/>
1382  <x:anchor-alias value="ctext"/>
1383   Comments can be included in some HTTP header fields by surrounding
1384   the comment text with parentheses. Comments are only allowed in
1385   fields containing "comment" as part of their field value definition.
1386</t>
1387<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="comment"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="ctext"/>
1388  <x:ref>comment</x:ref>        = "(" *( <x:ref>ctext</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-cpair</x:ref> / <x:ref>comment</x:ref> ) ")"
1389  <x:ref>ctext</x:ref>          = <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> / %x21-27 / %x2A-5B / %x5D-7E / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref>
1390</artwork></figure>
1391<t anchor="rule.quoted-cpair">
1392  <x:anchor-alias value="quoted-cpair"/>
1393   The backslash octet ("\") can be used as a single-octet
1394   quoting mechanism within comment constructs:
1395</t>
1396<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="quoted-cpair"/>
1397  <x:ref>quoted-cpair</x:ref>   = "\" ( <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / <x:ref>VCHAR</x:ref> / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> )
1398</artwork></figure>
1399<t>
1400   Senders &SHOULD-NOT; escape octets in comments that do not require escaping
1401   (i.e., other than the backslash octet "\" and the parentheses "(" and ")").
1402</t>
1403</section>
1404
1405<section title="ABNF list extension: #rule" anchor="abnf.extension">
1406<t>
1407  A #rule extension to the ABNF rules of <xref target="RFC5234"/> is used to
1408  improve readability in the definitions of some header field values.
1409</t>
1410<t>
1411  A construct "#" is defined, similar to "*", for defining comma-delimited
1412  lists of elements. The full form is "&lt;n&gt;#&lt;m&gt;element" indicating
1413  at least &lt;n&gt; and at most &lt;m&gt; elements, each separated by a single
1414  comma (",") and optional whitespace (OWS).   
1415</t>
1416<figure><preamble>
1417  Thus,
1418</preamble><artwork type="example">
1419  1#element =&gt; element *( OWS "," OWS element )
1420</artwork></figure>
1421<figure><preamble>
1422  and:
1423</preamble><artwork type="example">
1424  #element =&gt; [ 1#element ]
1425</artwork></figure>
1426<figure><preamble>
1427  and for n &gt;= 1 and m &gt; 1:
1428</preamble><artwork type="example">
1429  &lt;n&gt;#&lt;m&gt;element =&gt; element &lt;n-1&gt;*&lt;m-1&gt;( OWS "," OWS element )
1430</artwork></figure>
1431<t>
1432  For compatibility with legacy list rules, recipients &SHOULD; accept empty
1433  list elements. In other words, consumers would follow the list productions:
1434</t>
1435<figure><artwork type="example">
1436  #element =&gt; [ ( "," / element ) *( OWS "," [ OWS element ] ) ]
1437 
1438  1#element =&gt; *( "," OWS ) element *( OWS "," [ OWS element ] )
1439</artwork></figure>
1440<t>
1441  Note that empty elements do not contribute to the count of elements present,
1442  though.
1443</t>
1444<t>
1445  For example, given these ABNF productions:
1446</t>
1447<figure><artwork type="example">
1448  example-list      = 1#example-list-elmt
1449  example-list-elmt = token ; see <xref target="field.components"/> 
1450</artwork></figure>
1451<t>
1452  Then these are valid values for example-list (not including the double
1453  quotes, which are present for delimitation only):
1454</t>
1455<figure><artwork type="example">
1456  "foo,bar"
1457  "foo ,bar,"
1458  "foo , ,bar,charlie   "
1459</artwork></figure>
1460<t>
1461  But these values would be invalid, as at least one non-empty element is
1462  required:
1463</t>
1464<figure><artwork type="example">
1465  ""
1466  ","
1467  ",   ,"
1468</artwork></figure>
1469<t>
1470  <xref target="collected.abnf"/> shows the collected ABNF, with the list rules
1471  expanded as explained above.
1472</t>
1473</section>
1474</section>
1475
1476<section title="Message Body" anchor="message.body">
1477  <x:anchor-alias value="message-body"/>
1478<t>
1479   The message body (if any) of an HTTP message is used to carry the
1480   payload body of that request or response.  The message body is
1481   identical to the payload body unless a transfer coding has been
1482   applied, as described in <xref target="header.transfer-encoding"/>.
1483</t>
1484<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="message-body"/>
1485  <x:ref>message-body</x:ref> = *OCTET
1486</artwork></figure>
1487<t>
1488   The rules for when a message body is allowed in a message differ for
1489   requests and responses.
1490</t>
1491<t>
1492   The presence of a message body in a request is signaled by a
1493   a <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> or <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header
1494   field. Request message framing is independent of method semantics,
1495   even if the method does not define any use for a message body.
1496</t>
1497<t>
1498   The presence of a message body in a response depends on both
1499   the request method to which it is responding and the response
1500   status code (<xref target="status-code"/>).
1501   Responses to the HEAD request method never include a message body
1502   because the associated response header fields (e.g.,
1503   <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref>, <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref>, etc.) only
1504   indicate what their values would have been if the request method had been
1505   GET. <x:ref>2xx (Successful)</x:ref> responses to CONNECT switch to tunnel
1506   mode instead of having a message body.
1507   All <x:ref>1xx (Informational)</x:ref>, <x:ref>204 (No Content)</x:ref>, and
1508   <x:ref>304 (Not Modified)</x:ref> responses &MUST-NOT; include a message body.
1509   All other responses do include a message body, although the body
1510   &MAY; be of zero length. (See &status-codes; and &status-304;.)
1511</t>
1512
1513<section title="Transfer-Encoding" anchor="header.transfer-encoding">
1514  <iref primary="true" item="Transfer-Encoding header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
1515  <iref primary="true" item="Header Fields" subitem="Transfer-Encoding" x:for-anchor=""/>
1516  <x:anchor-alias value="Transfer-Encoding"/>
1517<t>
1518   When one or more transfer codings are applied to a payload body in order
1519   to form the message body, a Transfer-Encoding header field &MUST; be sent
1520   in the message and &MUST; contain the list of corresponding
1521   transfer-coding names in the same order that they were applied.
1522   Transfer codings are defined in <xref target="transfer.codings"/>.
1523</t>
1524<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Transfer-Encoding"/>
1525  <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> = 1#<x:ref>transfer-coding</x:ref>
1526</artwork></figure>
1527<t>
1528   Transfer-Encoding is analogous to the Content-Transfer-Encoding field of
1529   MIME, which was designed to enable safe transport of binary data over a
1530   7-bit transport service (<xref target="RFC2045" x:fmt="," x:sec="6"/>).
1531   However, safe transport has a different focus for an 8bit-clean transfer
1532   protocol. In HTTP's case, Transfer-Encoding is primarily intended to
1533   accurately delimit a dynamically generated payload and to distinguish
1534   payload encodings that are only applied for transport efficiency or
1535   security from those that are characteristics of the target resource.
1536</t>
1537<t>
1538   The "chunked" transfer-coding (<xref target="chunked.encoding"/>)
1539   &MUST; be implemented by all HTTP/1.1 recipients because it plays a
1540   crucial role in delimiting messages when the payload body size is not
1541   known in advance.
1542   When the "chunked" transfer-coding is used, it &MUST; be the last
1543   transfer-coding applied to form the message body and &MUST-NOT;
1544   be applied more than once in a message body.
1545   If any transfer-coding is applied to a request payload body,
1546   the final transfer-coding applied &MUST; be "chunked".
1547   If any transfer-coding is applied to a response payload body, then either
1548   the final transfer-coding applied &MUST; be "chunked" or
1549   the message &MUST; be terminated by closing the connection.
1550</t>
1551<figure><preamble>
1552   For example,
1553</preamble><artwork type="example">
1554  Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked
1555</artwork><postamble>
1556   indicates that the payload body has been compressed using the gzip
1557   coding and then chunked using the chunked coding while forming the
1558   message body.
1559</postamble></figure>
1560<t>
1561   If more than one Transfer-Encoding header field is present in a message,
1562   the multiple field-values &MUST; be combined into one field-value,
1563   according to the algorithm defined in <xref target="header.fields"/>,
1564   before determining the message body length.
1565</t>
1566<t>
1567   Unlike <x:ref>Content-Encoding</x:ref> (&content-codings;),
1568   Transfer-Encoding is a property of the message, not of the payload, and thus
1569   &MAY; be added or removed by any implementation along the request/response
1570   chain. Additional information about the encoding parameters &MAY; be
1571   provided by other header fields not defined by this specification.
1572</t>
1573<t>
1574   Transfer-Encoding &MAY; be sent in a response to a HEAD request or in a
1575   <x:ref>304 (Not Modified)</x:ref> response (&status-304;) to a GET request,
1576   neither of which includes a message body,
1577   to indicate that the origin server would have applied a transfer coding
1578   to the message body if the request had been an unconditional GET.
1579   This indication is not required, however, because any recipient on
1580   the response chain (including the origin server) can remove transfer
1581   codings when they are not needed.
1582</t>
1583<t>
1584   Transfer-Encoding was added in HTTP/1.1.  It is generally assumed that
1585   implementations advertising only HTTP/1.0 support will not understand
1586   how to process a transfer-encoded payload.
1587   A client &MUST-NOT; send a request containing Transfer-Encoding unless it
1588   knows the server will handle HTTP/1.1 (or later) requests; such knowledge
1589   might be in the form of specific user configuration or by remembering the
1590   version of a prior received response.
1591   A server &MUST-NOT; send a response containing Transfer-Encoding unless
1592   the corresponding request indicates HTTP/1.1 (or later).
1593</t>
1594<t>
1595   A server that receives a request message with a transfer-coding it does
1596   not understand &SHOULD; respond with <x:ref>501 (Not Implemented)</x:ref> and then
1597   close the connection.
1598</t>
1599</section>
1600
1601<section title="Content-Length" anchor="header.content-length">
1602  <iref primary="true" item="Content-Length header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
1603  <iref primary="true" item="Header Fields" subitem="Content-Length" x:for-anchor=""/>
1604  <x:anchor-alias value="Content-Length"/>
1605<t>
1606   When a message does not have a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header field
1607   and the payload body length can be determined prior to being transferred, a
1608   Content-Length header field &SHOULD; be sent to indicate the length of the
1609   payload body that is either present as the message body, for requests
1610   and non-HEAD responses other than <x:ref>304 (Not Modified)</x:ref>, or
1611   would have been present had the request been an unconditional GET.  The
1612   length is expressed as a decimal number of octets.
1613</t>
1614<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Content-Length"/>
1615  <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> = 1*<x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref>
1616</artwork></figure>
1617<t>
1618   An example is
1619</t>
1620<figure><artwork type="example">
1621  Content-Length: 3495
1622</artwork></figure>
1623<t>
1624   In the case of a response to a HEAD request, Content-Length indicates
1625   the size of the payload body (without any potential transfer-coding)
1626   that would have been sent had the request been a GET.
1627   In the case of a <x:ref>304 (Not Modified)</x:ref> response (&status-304;)
1628   to a GET request, Content-Length indicates the size of the payload body (without
1629   any potential transfer-coding) that would have been sent in a <x:ref>200 (OK)</x:ref>
1630   response.
1631</t>
1632<t>
1633   HTTP's use of Content-Length is significantly different from how it is
1634   used in MIME, where it is an optional field used only within the
1635   "message/external-body" media-type.
1636</t>
1637<t>
1638   Any Content-Length field value greater than or equal to zero is valid.
1639   Since there is no predefined limit to the length of an HTTP payload,
1640   recipients &SHOULD; anticipate potentially large decimal numerals and
1641   prevent parsing errors due to integer conversion overflows
1642   (<xref target="attack.protocol.element.size.overflows"/>).
1643</t>
1644<t>
1645   If a message is received that has multiple Content-Length header fields
1646   (<xref target="header.content-length"/>) with field-values consisting
1647   of the same decimal value, or a single Content-Length header field with
1648   a field value containing a list of identical decimal values (e.g.,
1649   "Content-Length: 42, 42"), indicating that duplicate Content-Length
1650   header fields have been generated or combined by an upstream message
1651   processor, then the recipient &MUST; either reject the message as invalid
1652   or replace the duplicated field-values with a single valid Content-Length
1653   field containing that decimal value prior to determining the message body
1654   length.
1655</t>
1656</section>
1657
1658<section title="Message Body Length" anchor="message.body.length">
1659<t>
1660   The length of a message body is determined by one of the following
1661   (in order of precedence):
1662</t>
1663<t>
1664  <list style="numbers">
1665    <x:lt><t>
1666     Any response to a HEAD request and any response with a
1667     <x:ref>1xx (Informational)</x:ref>, <x:ref>204 (No Content)</x:ref>, or
1668     <x:ref>304 (Not Modified)</x:ref> status code is always
1669     terminated by the first empty line after the header fields, regardless of
1670     the header fields present in the message, and thus cannot contain a
1671     message body.
1672    </t></x:lt>
1673    <x:lt><t>
1674     Any <x:ref>2xx (Successful)</x:ref> response to a CONNECT request implies that the
1675     connection will become a tunnel immediately after the empty line that
1676     concludes the header fields.  A client &MUST; ignore any
1677     <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> or <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header
1678     fields received in such a message.
1679    </t></x:lt>
1680    <x:lt><t>
1681     If a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header field is present
1682     and the "chunked" transfer-coding (<xref target="chunked.encoding"/>)
1683     is the final encoding, the message body length is determined by reading
1684     and decoding the chunked data until the transfer-coding indicates the
1685     data is complete.
1686    </t>
1687    <t>
1688     If a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header field is present in a
1689     response and the "chunked" transfer-coding is not the final encoding, the
1690     message body length is determined by reading the connection until it is
1691     closed by the server.
1692     If a Transfer-Encoding header field is present in a request and the
1693     "chunked" transfer-coding is not the final encoding, the message body
1694     length cannot be determined reliably; the server &MUST; respond with
1695     the <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> status code and then close the connection.
1696    </t>
1697    <t>
1698     If a message is received with both a <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref>
1699     and a <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header field, the
1700     Transfer-Encoding overrides the Content-Length.
1701     Such a message might indicate an attempt to perform request or response
1702     smuggling (bypass of security-related checks on message routing or content)
1703     and thus ought to be handled as an error.  The provided Content-Length &MUST;
1704     be removed, prior to forwarding the message downstream, or replaced with
1705     the real message body length after the transfer-coding is decoded.
1706    </t></x:lt>
1707    <x:lt><t>
1708     If a message is received without <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> and with
1709     either multiple <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header fields having
1710     differing field-values or a single Content-Length header field having an
1711     invalid value, then the message framing is invalid and &MUST; be treated
1712     as an error to prevent request or response smuggling.
1713     If this is a request message, the server &MUST; respond with
1714     a <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> status code and then close the connection.
1715     If this is a response message received by a proxy, the proxy
1716     &MUST; discard the received response, send a <x:ref>502 (Bad Gateway)</x:ref>
1717     status code as its downstream response, and then close the connection.
1718     If this is a response message received by a user-agent, it &MUST; be
1719     treated as an error by discarding the message and closing the connection.
1720    </t></x:lt>
1721    <x:lt><t>
1722     If a valid <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header field is present without
1723     <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref>, its decimal value defines the
1724     message body length in octets.  If the actual number of octets sent in
1725     the message is less than the indicated Content-Length, the recipient
1726     &MUST; consider the message to be incomplete and treat the connection
1727     as no longer usable.
1728     If the actual number of octets sent in the message is more than the indicated
1729     Content-Length, the recipient &MUST; only process the message body up to the
1730     field value's number of octets; the remainder of the message &MUST; either
1731     be discarded or treated as the next message in a pipeline.  For the sake of
1732     robustness, a user-agent &MAY; attempt to detect and correct such an error
1733     in message framing if it is parsing the response to the last request on
1734     a connection and the connection has been closed by the server.
1735    </t></x:lt>
1736    <x:lt><t>
1737     If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then the
1738     message body length is zero (no message body is present).
1739    </t></x:lt>
1740    <x:lt><t>
1741     Otherwise, this is a response message without a declared message body
1742     length, so the message body length is determined by the number of octets
1743     received prior to the server closing the connection.
1744    </t></x:lt>
1745  </list>
1746</t>
1747<t>
1748   Since there is no way to distinguish a successfully completed,
1749   close-delimited message from a partially-received message interrupted
1750   by network failure, implementations &SHOULD; use encoding or
1751   length-delimited messages whenever possible.  The close-delimiting
1752   feature exists primarily for backwards compatibility with HTTP/1.0.
1753</t>
1754<t>
1755   A server &MAY; reject a request that contains a message body but
1756   not a <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> by responding with
1757   <x:ref>411 (Length Required)</x:ref>.
1758</t>
1759<t>
1760   Unless a transfer-coding other than "chunked" has been applied,
1761   a client that sends a request containing a message body &SHOULD;
1762   use a valid <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header field if the message body
1763   length is known in advance, rather than the "chunked" encoding, since some
1764   existing services respond to "chunked" with a <x:ref>411 (Length Required)</x:ref>
1765   status code even though they understand the chunked encoding.  This
1766   is typically because such services are implemented via a gateway that
1767   requires a content-length in advance of being called and the server
1768   is unable or unwilling to buffer the entire request before processing.
1769</t>
1770<t>
1771   A client that sends a request containing a message body &MUST; include a
1772   valid <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header field if it does not know the
1773   server will handle HTTP/1.1 (or later) requests; such knowledge can be in
1774   the form of specific user configuration or by remembering the version of a
1775   prior received response.
1776</t>
1777</section>
1778</section>
1779
1780<section anchor="incomplete.messages" title="Handling Incomplete Messages">
1781<t>
1782   Request messages that are prematurely terminated, possibly due to a
1783   cancelled connection or a server-imposed time-out exception, &MUST;
1784   result in closure of the connection; sending an HTTP/1.1 error response
1785   prior to closing the connection is &OPTIONAL;.
1786</t>
1787<t>
1788   Response messages that are prematurely terminated, usually by closure
1789   of the connection prior to receiving the expected number of octets or by
1790   failure to decode a transfer-encoded message body, &MUST; be recorded
1791   as incomplete.  A response that terminates in the middle of the header
1792   block (before the empty line is received) cannot be assumed to convey the
1793   full semantics of the response and &MUST; be treated as an error.
1794</t>
1795<t>
1796   A message body that uses the chunked transfer encoding is
1797   incomplete if the zero-sized chunk that terminates the encoding has not
1798   been received.  A message that uses a valid <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> is
1799   incomplete if the size of the message body received (in octets) is less than
1800   the value given by Content-Length.  A response that has neither chunked
1801   transfer encoding nor Content-Length is terminated by closure of the
1802   connection, and thus is considered complete regardless of the number of
1803   message body octets received, provided that the header block was received
1804   intact.
1805</t>
1806<t>
1807   A user agent &MUST-NOT; render an incomplete response message body as if
1808   it were complete (i.e., some indication needs to be given to the user that an
1809   error occurred).  Cache requirements for incomplete responses are defined
1810   in &cache-incomplete;.
1811</t>
1812<t>
1813   A server &MUST; read the entire request message body or close
1814   the connection after sending its response, since otherwise the
1815   remaining data on a persistent connection would be misinterpreted
1816   as the next request.  Likewise,
1817   a client &MUST; read the entire response message body if it intends
1818   to reuse the same connection for a subsequent request.  Pipelining
1819   multiple requests on a connection is described in <xref target="pipelining"/>.
1820</t>
1821</section>
1822
1823<section title="Message Parsing Robustness" anchor="message.robustness">
1824<t>
1825   Older HTTP/1.0 client implementations might send an extra CRLF
1826   after a POST request as a lame workaround for some early server
1827   applications that failed to read message body content that was
1828   not terminated by a line-ending. An HTTP/1.1 client &MUST-NOT;
1829   preface or follow a request with an extra CRLF.  If terminating
1830   the request message body with a line-ending is desired, then the
1831   client &MUST; include the terminating CRLF octets as part of the
1832   message body length.
1833</t>
1834<t>
1835   In the interest of robustness, servers &SHOULD; ignore at least one
1836   empty line received where a request-line is expected. In other words, if
1837   the server is reading the protocol stream at the beginning of a
1838   message and receives a CRLF first, it &SHOULD; ignore the CRLF.
1839   Likewise, although the line terminator for the start-line and header
1840   fields is the sequence CRLF, we recommend that recipients recognize a
1841   single LF as a line terminator and ignore any CR.
1842</t>
1843<t>
1844   When a server listening only for HTTP request messages, or processing
1845   what appears from the start-line to be an HTTP request message,
1846   receives a sequence of octets that does not match the HTTP-message
1847   grammar aside from the robustness exceptions listed above, the
1848   server &MUST; respond with an HTTP/1.1 <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> response. 
1849</t>
1850</section>
1851</section>
1852
1853<section title="Transfer Codings" anchor="transfer.codings">
1854  <x:anchor-alias value="transfer-coding"/>
1855  <x:anchor-alias value="transfer-extension"/>
1856<t>
1857   Transfer-coding values are used to indicate an encoding
1858   transformation that has been, can be, or might need to be applied to a
1859   payload body in order to ensure "safe transport" through the network.
1860   This differs from a content coding in that the transfer-coding is a
1861   property of the message rather than a property of the representation
1862   that is being transferred.
1863</t>
1864<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="transfer-coding"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="transfer-extension"/>
1865  <x:ref>transfer-coding</x:ref>    = "chunked" ; <xref target="chunked.encoding"/>
1866                     / "compress" ; <xref target="compress.coding"/>
1867                     / "deflate" ; <xref target="deflate.coding"/>
1868                     / "gzip" ; <xref target="gzip.coding"/>
1869                     / <x:ref>transfer-extension</x:ref>
1870  <x:ref>transfer-extension</x:ref> = <x:ref>token</x:ref> *( <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> ";" <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> <x:ref>transfer-parameter</x:ref> )
1871</artwork></figure>
1872<t anchor="rule.parameter">
1873  <x:anchor-alias value="attribute"/>
1874  <x:anchor-alias value="transfer-parameter"/>
1875  <x:anchor-alias value="value"/>
1876   Parameters are in the form of attribute/value pairs.
1877</t>
1878<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="transfer-parameter"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="attribute"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="value"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="date2"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="date3"/>
1879  <x:ref>transfer-parameter</x:ref> = <x:ref>attribute</x:ref> <x:ref>BWS</x:ref> "=" <x:ref>BWS</x:ref> <x:ref>value</x:ref>
1880  <x:ref>attribute</x:ref>          = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
1881  <x:ref>value</x:ref>              = <x:ref>word</x:ref>
1882</artwork></figure>
1883<t>
1884   All transfer-coding values are case-insensitive.
1885   The HTTP Transfer Coding registry is defined in
1886   <xref target="transfer.coding.registry"/>.
1887   HTTP/1.1 uses transfer-coding values in the <x:ref>TE</x:ref> header field
1888   (<xref target="header.te"/>) and in the <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref>
1889   header field (<xref target="header.transfer-encoding"/>).
1890</t>
1891
1892<section title="Chunked Transfer Coding" anchor="chunked.encoding">
1893  <iref item="chunked (Coding Format)"/>
1894  <iref item="Coding Format" subitem="chunked"/>
1895  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk"/>
1896  <x:anchor-alias value="chunked-body"/>
1897  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-data"/>
1898  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-ext"/>
1899  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-ext-name"/>
1900  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-ext-val"/>
1901  <x:anchor-alias value="chunk-size"/>
1902  <x:anchor-alias value="last-chunk"/>
1903  <x:anchor-alias value="trailer-part"/>
1904  <x:anchor-alias value="quoted-str-nf"/>
1905  <x:anchor-alias value="qdtext-nf"/>
1906<t>
1907   The chunked encoding modifies the body of a message in order to
1908   transfer it as a series of chunks, each with its own size indicator,
1909   followed by an &OPTIONAL; trailer containing header fields. This
1910   allows dynamically produced content to be transferred along with the
1911   information necessary for the recipient to verify that it has
1912   received the full message.
1913</t>
1914<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunked-body"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-size"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="last-chunk"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-ext"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-ext-name"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-ext-val"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="chunk-data"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="trailer-part"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="quoted-str-nf"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="qdtext-nf"/>
1915  <x:ref>chunked-body</x:ref>   = *<x:ref>chunk</x:ref>
1916                   <x:ref>last-chunk</x:ref>
1917                   <x:ref>trailer-part</x:ref>
1918                   <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1919 
1920  <x:ref>chunk</x:ref>          = <x:ref>chunk-size</x:ref> [ <x:ref>chunk-ext</x:ref> ] <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1921                   <x:ref>chunk-data</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1922  <x:ref>chunk-size</x:ref>     = 1*<x:ref>HEXDIG</x:ref>
1923  <x:ref>last-chunk</x:ref>     = 1*("0") [ <x:ref>chunk-ext</x:ref> ] <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref>
1924 
1925  <x:ref>chunk-ext</x:ref>      = *( ";" <x:ref>chunk-ext-name</x:ref> [ "=" <x:ref>chunk-ext-val</x:ref> ] )
1926  <x:ref>chunk-ext-name</x:ref> = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
1927  <x:ref>chunk-ext-val</x:ref>  = <x:ref>token</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-str-nf</x:ref>
1928  <x:ref>chunk-data</x:ref>     = 1*<x:ref>OCTET</x:ref> ; a sequence of chunk-size octets
1929  <x:ref>trailer-part</x:ref>   = *( <x:ref>header-field</x:ref> <x:ref>CRLF</x:ref> )
1930 
1931  <x:ref>quoted-str-nf</x:ref>  = <x:ref>DQUOTE</x:ref> *( <x:ref>qdtext-nf</x:ref> / <x:ref>quoted-pair</x:ref> ) <x:ref>DQUOTE</x:ref>
1932                 ; like <x:ref>quoted-string</x:ref>, but disallowing line folding
1933  <x:ref>qdtext-nf</x:ref>      = <x:ref>HTAB</x:ref> / <x:ref>SP</x:ref> / %x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / <x:ref>obs-text</x:ref>
1934</artwork></figure>
1935<t>
1936   The chunk-size field is a string of hex digits indicating the size of
1937   the chunk-data in octets. The chunked encoding is ended by any chunk whose size is
1938   zero, followed by the trailer, which is terminated by an empty line.
1939</t>
1940<t>
1941   The trailer allows the sender to include additional HTTP header
1942   fields at the end of the message. The <x:ref>Trailer</x:ref> header field
1943   can be used to indicate which header fields are included in a trailer (see
1944   <xref target="header.trailer"/>).
1945</t>
1946<t>
1947   A server using chunked transfer-coding in a response &MUST-NOT; use the
1948   trailer for any header fields unless at least one of the following is
1949   true:
1950  <list style="numbers">
1951    <t>the request included a <x:ref>TE</x:ref> header field that indicates
1952    "trailers" is acceptable in the transfer-coding of the response, as
1953    described in <xref target="header.te"/>; or,</t>
1954     
1955    <t>the trailer fields consist entirely of optional metadata, and the
1956    recipient could use the message (in a manner acceptable to the server where
1957    the field originated) without receiving it. In other words, the server that
1958    generated the header (often but not always the origin server) is willing to
1959    accept the possibility that the trailer fields might be silently discarded
1960    along the path to the client.</t>
1961  </list>
1962</t>
1963<t>
1964   This requirement prevents an interoperability failure when the
1965   message is being received by an HTTP/1.1 (or later) proxy and
1966   forwarded to an HTTP/1.0 recipient. It avoids a situation where
1967   conformance with the protocol would have necessitated a possibly
1968   infinite buffer on the proxy.
1969</t>
1970<t>
1971   A process for decoding the "chunked" transfer-coding
1972   can be represented in pseudo-code as:
1973</t>
1974<figure><artwork type="code">
1975  length := 0
1976  read chunk-size, chunk-ext (if any) and CRLF
1977  while (chunk-size &gt; 0) {
1978     read chunk-data and CRLF
1979     append chunk-data to decoded-body
1980     length := length + chunk-size
1981     read chunk-size and CRLF
1982  }
1983  read header-field
1984  while (header-field not empty) {
1985     append header-field to existing header fields
1986     read header-field
1987  }
1988  Content-Length := length
1989  Remove "chunked" from Transfer-Encoding
1990</artwork></figure>
1991<t>
1992   All HTTP/1.1 applications &MUST; be able to receive and decode the
1993   "chunked" transfer-coding and &MUST; ignore chunk-ext extensions
1994   they do not understand.
1995</t>
1996<t>
1997   Use of chunk-ext extensions by senders is deprecated; they &SHOULD-NOT; be
1998   sent and definition of new chunk-extensions is discouraged.
1999</t>
2000</section>
2001
2002<section title="Compression Codings" anchor="compression.codings">
2003<t>
2004   The codings defined below can be used to compress the payload of a
2005   message.
2006</t>
2007<x:note><t>
2008   &Note; Use of program names for the identification of encoding formats
2009   is not desirable and is discouraged for future encodings. Their
2010   use here is representative of historical practice, not good
2011   design.
2012</t></x:note>
2013<x:note><t>
2014   &Note; For compatibility with previous implementations of HTTP,
2015   applications &SHOULD; consider "x-gzip" and "x-compress" to be
2016   equivalent to "gzip" and "compress" respectively.
2017</t></x:note>
2018
2019<section title="Compress Coding" anchor="compress.coding">
2020<iref item="compress (Coding Format)"/>
2021<iref item="Coding Format" subitem="compress"/>
2022<t>
2023   The "compress" format is produced by the common UNIX file compression
2024   program "compress". This format is an adaptive Lempel-Ziv-Welch
2025   coding (LZW).
2026</t>
2027</section>
2028
2029<section title="Deflate Coding" anchor="deflate.coding">
2030<iref item="deflate (Coding Format)"/>
2031<iref item="Coding Format" subitem="deflate"/>
2032<t>
2033   The "deflate" format is defined as the "deflate" compression mechanism
2034   (described in <xref target="RFC1951"/>) used inside the "zlib"
2035   data format (<xref target="RFC1950"/>).
2036</t>
2037<x:note>
2038  <t>
2039    &Note; Some incorrect implementations send the "deflate"
2040    compressed data without the zlib wrapper.
2041   </t>
2042</x:note>
2043</section>
2044
2045<section title="Gzip Coding" anchor="gzip.coding">
2046<iref item="gzip (Coding Format)"/>
2047<iref item="Coding Format" subitem="gzip"/>
2048<t>
2049   The "gzip" format is produced by the file compression program
2050   "gzip" (GNU zip), as described in <xref target="RFC1952"/>. This format is a
2051   Lempel-Ziv coding (LZ77) with a 32 bit CRC.
2052</t>
2053</section>
2054
2055</section>
2056
2057<section title="TE" anchor="header.te">
2058  <iref primary="true" item="TE header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2059  <iref primary="true" item="Header Fields" subitem="TE" x:for-anchor=""/>
2060  <x:anchor-alias value="TE"/>
2061  <x:anchor-alias value="t-codings"/>
2062  <x:anchor-alias value="te-params"/>
2063  <x:anchor-alias value="te-ext"/>
2064<t>
2065   The "TE" header field indicates what extension transfer-codings
2066   the client is willing to accept in the response, and whether or not it is
2067   willing to accept trailer fields in a chunked transfer-coding.
2068</t>
2069<t>
2070   Its value consists of the keyword "trailers" and/or a comma-separated
2071   list of extension transfer-coding names with optional accept
2072   parameters (as described in <xref target="transfer.codings"/>).
2073</t>
2074<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="TE"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="t-codings"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="te-params"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="te-ext"/>
2075  <x:ref>TE</x:ref>        = #<x:ref>t-codings</x:ref>
2076  <x:ref>t-codings</x:ref> = "trailers" / ( <x:ref>transfer-extension</x:ref> [ <x:ref>te-params</x:ref> ] )
2077  <x:ref>te-params</x:ref> = <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> ";" <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> "q=" <x:ref>qvalue</x:ref> *( <x:ref>te-ext</x:ref> )
2078  <x:ref>te-ext</x:ref>    = <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> ";" <x:ref>OWS</x:ref> <x:ref>token</x:ref> [ "=" <x:ref>word</x:ref> ]
2079</artwork></figure>
2080<t>
2081   The presence of the keyword "trailers" indicates that the client is
2082   willing to accept trailer fields in a chunked transfer-coding, as
2083   defined in <xref target="chunked.encoding"/>. This keyword is reserved for use with
2084   transfer-coding values even though it does not itself represent a
2085   transfer-coding.
2086</t>
2087<t>
2088   Examples of its use are:
2089</t>
2090<figure><artwork type="example">
2091  TE: deflate
2092  TE:
2093  TE: trailers, deflate;q=0.5
2094</artwork></figure>
2095<t>
2096   The TE header field only applies to the immediate connection.
2097   Therefore, the keyword &MUST; be supplied within a <x:ref>Connection</x:ref>
2098   header field (<xref target="header.connection"/>) whenever TE is present in
2099   an HTTP/1.1 message.
2100</t>
2101<t>
2102   A server tests whether a transfer-coding is acceptable, according to
2103   a TE field, using these rules:
2104  <list style="numbers">
2105    <x:lt>
2106      <t>The "chunked" transfer-coding is always acceptable. If the
2107         keyword "trailers" is listed, the client indicates that it is
2108         willing to accept trailer fields in the chunked response on
2109         behalf of itself and any downstream clients. The implication is
2110         that, if given, the client is stating that either all
2111         downstream clients are willing to accept trailer fields in the
2112         forwarded response, or that it will attempt to buffer the
2113         response on behalf of downstream recipients.
2114      </t><t>
2115         &Note; HTTP/1.1 does not define any means to limit the size of a
2116         chunked response such that a client can be assured of buffering
2117         the entire response.</t>
2118    </x:lt>
2119    <x:lt>
2120      <t>If the transfer-coding being tested is one of the transfer-codings
2121         listed in the TE field, then it is acceptable unless it
2122         is accompanied by a qvalue of 0. (As defined in <xref target="quality.values"/>, a
2123         qvalue of 0 means "not acceptable".)</t>
2124    </x:lt>
2125    <x:lt>
2126      <t>If multiple transfer-codings are acceptable, then the
2127         acceptable transfer-coding with the highest non-zero qvalue is
2128         preferred.  The "chunked" transfer-coding always has a qvalue
2129         of 1.</t>
2130    </x:lt>
2131  </list>
2132</t>
2133<t>
2134   If the TE field-value is empty or if no TE field is present, the only
2135   acceptable transfer-coding is "chunked". A message with no transfer-coding is
2136   always acceptable.
2137</t>
2138
2139<section title="Quality Values" anchor="quality.values">
2140  <x:anchor-alias value="qvalue"/>
2141<t>
2142   Both transfer codings (<x:ref>TE</x:ref> request header field,
2143   <xref target="header.te"/>) and content negotiation (&content.negotiation;)
2144   use short "floating point" numbers to indicate the relative importance
2145   ("weight") of various negotiable parameters.  A weight is normalized to a
2146   real number in the range 0 through 1, where 0 is the minimum and 1 the
2147   maximum value. If a parameter has a quality value of 0, then content with
2148   this parameter is "not acceptable" for the client. HTTP/1.1
2149   applications &MUST-NOT; generate more than three digits after the
2150   decimal point. User configuration of these values &SHOULD; also be
2151   limited in this fashion.
2152</t>
2153<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="qvalue"/>
2154  <x:ref>qvalue</x:ref>         = ( "0" [ "." 0*3<x:ref>DIGIT</x:ref> ] )
2155                 / ( "1" [ "." 0*3("0") ] )
2156</artwork></figure>
2157<x:note>
2158  <t>
2159     &Note; "Quality values" is a misnomer, since these values merely represent
2160     relative degradation in desired quality.
2161  </t>
2162</x:note>
2163</section>
2164</section>
2165
2166<section title="Trailer" anchor="header.trailer">
2167  <iref primary="true" item="Trailer header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2168  <iref primary="true" item="Header Fields" subitem="Trailer" x:for-anchor=""/>
2169  <x:anchor-alias value="Trailer"/>
2170<t>
2171   The "Trailer" header field indicates that the given set of
2172   header fields is present in the trailer of a message encoded with
2173   chunked transfer-coding.
2174</t>
2175<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Trailer"/>
2176  <x:ref>Trailer</x:ref> = 1#<x:ref>field-name</x:ref>
2177</artwork></figure>
2178<t>
2179   An HTTP/1.1 message &SHOULD; include a Trailer header field in a
2180   message using chunked transfer-coding with a non-empty trailer. Doing
2181   so allows the recipient to know which header fields to expect in the
2182   trailer.
2183</t>
2184<t>
2185   If no Trailer header field is present, the trailer &SHOULD-NOT;  include
2186   any header fields. See <xref target="chunked.encoding"/> for restrictions on the use of
2187   trailer fields in a "chunked" transfer-coding.
2188</t>
2189<t>
2190   Message header fields listed in the Trailer header field &MUST-NOT;
2191   include the following header fields:
2192  <list style="symbols">
2193    <t><x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref></t>
2194    <t><x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref></t>
2195    <t><x:ref>Trailer</x:ref></t>
2196  </list>
2197</t>
2198</section>
2199</section>
2200
2201<section title="Message Routing" anchor="message.routing">
2202<t>
2203   HTTP request message routing is determined by each client based on the
2204   target resource, the client's proxy configuration, and
2205   establishment or reuse of an inbound connection.  The corresponding
2206   response routing follows the same connection chain back to the client.
2207</t>
2208
2209<section title="Identifying a Target Resource" anchor="target-resource">
2210  <iref primary="true" item="target resource"/>
2211  <iref primary="true" item="target URI"/>
2212<t>
2213   HTTP is used in a wide variety of applications, ranging from
2214   general-purpose computers to home appliances.  In some cases,
2215   communication options are hard-coded in a client's configuration.
2216   However, most HTTP clients rely on the same resource identification
2217   mechanism and configuration techniques as general-purpose Web browsers.
2218</t>
2219<t>
2220   HTTP communication is initiated by a user agent for some purpose.
2221   The purpose is a combination of request semantics, which are defined in
2222   <xref target="Part2"/>, and a target resource upon which to apply those
2223   semantics.  A URI reference (<xref target="uri"/>) is typically used as
2224   an identifier for the "target resource", which a user agent would resolve
2225   to its absolute form in order to obtain the "target URI".  The target URI
2226   excludes the reference's fragment identifier component, if any,
2227   since fragment identifiers are reserved for client-side processing
2228   (<xref target="RFC3986" x:fmt="," x:sec="3.5"/>).
2229</t>
2230<t>
2231   HTTP intermediaries obtain the request semantics and target URI
2232   from the request-line of an incoming request message.
2233</t>
2234</section>
2235
2236<section title="Connecting Inbound" anchor="connecting.inbound">
2237<t>
2238   Once the target URI is determined, a client needs to decide whether
2239   a network request is necessary to accomplish the desired semantics and,
2240   if so, where that request is to be directed.
2241</t>
2242<t>
2243   If the client has a response cache and the request semantics can be
2244   satisfied by a cache (<xref target="Part6"/>), then the request is
2245   usually directed to the cache first.
2246</t>
2247<t>
2248   If the request is not satisfied by a cache, then a typical client will
2249   check its configuration to determine whether a proxy is to be used to
2250   satisfy the request.  Proxy configuration is implementation-dependent,
2251   but is often based on URI prefix matching, selective authority matching,
2252   or both, and the proxy itself is usually identified by an "http" or
2253   "https" URI.  If a proxy is applicable, the client connects inbound by
2254   establishing (or reusing) a connection to that proxy.
2255</t>
2256<t>
2257   If no proxy is applicable, a typical client will invoke a handler routine,
2258   usually specific to the target URI's scheme, to connect directly
2259   to an authority for the target resource.  How that is accomplished is
2260   dependent on the target URI scheme and defined by its associated
2261   specification, similar to how this specification defines origin server
2262   access for resolution of the "http" (<xref target="http.uri"/>) and
2263   "https" (<xref target="https.uri"/>) schemes.
2264</t>
2265</section>
2266
2267<section title="Request Target" anchor="request-target">
2268<t>
2269   Once an inbound connection is obtained
2270   (<xref target="connection.management"/>),
2271   the client sends an HTTP request message (<xref target="http.message"/>)
2272   with a request-target derived from the target URI.
2273   There are four distinct formats for the request-target, depending on both
2274   the method being requested and whether the request is to a proxy.
2275</t>   
2276<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="request-target"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="origin-form"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="absolute-form"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="authority-form"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="asterisk-form"/>
2277  <x:ref>request-target</x:ref> = <x:ref>origin-form</x:ref>
2278                 / <x:ref>absolute-form</x:ref>
2279                 / <x:ref>authority-form</x:ref>
2280                 / <x:ref>asterisk-form</x:ref>
2281
2282  <x:ref>origin-form</x:ref>    = <x:ref>path-absolute</x:ref> [ "?" <x:ref>query</x:ref> ]
2283  <x:ref>absolute-form</x:ref>  = <x:ref>absolute-URI</x:ref>
2284  <x:ref>authority-form</x:ref> = <x:ref>authority</x:ref>
2285  <x:ref>asterisk-form</x:ref>  = "*"
2286</artwork></figure>
2287<t anchor="origin-form"><iref item="origin-form (of request-target)"/>
2288   The most common form of request-target is the origin-form.
2289   When making a request directly to an origin server, other than a CONNECT
2290   or server-wide OPTIONS request (as detailed below),
2291   a client &MUST; send only the absolute path and query components of
2292   the target URI as the request-target.
2293   If the target URI's path component is empty, then the client &MUST; send
2294   "/" as the path within the origin-form of request-target.
2295   A <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header field is also sent, as defined in
2296   <xref target="header.host"/>, containing the target URI's
2297   authority component (excluding any userinfo).
2298</t>
2299<t>
2300   For example, a client wishing to retrieve a representation of the resource
2301   identified as
2302</t>
2303<figure><artwork x:indent-with="  " type="example">
2304http://www.example.org/where?q=now
2305</artwork></figure>
2306<t>
2307   directly from the origin server would open (or reuse) a TCP connection
2308   to port 80 of the host "www.example.org" and send the lines:
2309</t>
2310<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2311GET /where?q=now HTTP/1.1
2312Host: www.example.org
2313</artwork></figure>
2314<t>
2315   followed by the remainder of the request message.
2316</t>
2317<t anchor="absolute-form"><iref item="absolute-form (of request-target)"/>
2318   When making a request to a proxy, other than a CONNECT or server-wide
2319   OPTIONS request (as detailed below), a client &MUST; send the target URI
2320   in absolute-form as the request-target.
2321   The proxy is requested to either service that request from a valid cache,
2322   if possible, or make the same request on the client's behalf to either
2323   the next inbound proxy server or directly to the origin server indicated
2324   by the request-target.  Requirements on such "forwarding" of messages are
2325   defined in <xref target="intermediary.forwarding"/>.
2326</t>
2327<t>
2328   An example absolute-form of request-line would be:
2329</t>
2330<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2331GET http://www.example.org/pub/WWW/TheProject.html HTTP/1.1
2332</artwork></figure>
2333<t>
2334   To allow for transition to the absolute-form for all requests in some
2335   future version of HTTP, HTTP/1.1 servers &MUST; accept the absolute-form
2336   in requests, even though HTTP/1.1 clients will only send them in requests
2337   to proxies.
2338</t>
2339<t anchor="authority-form"><iref item="authority-form (of request-target)"/>
2340   The authority-form of request-target is only used for CONNECT requests
2341   (&CONNECT;).  When making a CONNECT request to establish a tunnel through
2342   one or more proxies, a client &MUST; send only the target URI's
2343   authority component (excluding any userinfo) as the request-target.
2344   For example,
2345</t>
2346<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2347CONNECT www.example.com:80 HTTP/1.1
2348</artwork></figure>
2349<t anchor="asterisk-form"><iref item="asterisk-form (of request-target)"/>
2350   The asterisk-form of request-target is only used for a server-wide
2351   OPTIONS request (&OPTIONS;).  When a client wishes to request OPTIONS
2352   for the server as a whole, as opposed to a specific named resource of
2353   that server, the client &MUST; send only "*" (%x2A) as the request-target.
2354   For example,
2355</t>
2356<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2357OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1
2358</artwork></figure>
2359<t>
2360   If a proxy receives an OPTIONS request with an absolute-form of
2361   request-target in which the URI has an empty path and no query component,
2362   then the last proxy on the request chain &MUST; send a request-target
2363   of "*" when it forwards the request to the indicated origin server.
2364</t>
2365<figure><preamble>   
2366   For example, the request
2367</preamble><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2368OPTIONS http://www.example.org:8001 HTTP/1.1
2369</artwork></figure>
2370<figure><preamble>   
2371  would be forwarded by the final proxy as
2372</preamble><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2373OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1
2374Host: www.example.org:8001
2375</artwork>
2376<postamble>
2377   after connecting to port 8001 of host "www.example.org".
2378</postamble>
2379</figure>
2380</section>
2381
2382<section title="Host" anchor="header.host">
2383  <iref primary="true" item="Host header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2384  <iref primary="true" item="Header Fields" subitem="Host" x:for-anchor=""/>
2385  <x:anchor-alias value="Host"/>
2386<t>
2387   The "Host" header field in a request provides the host and port
2388   information from the target URI, enabling the origin
2389   server to distinguish among resources while servicing requests
2390   for multiple host names on a single IP address.  Since the Host
2391   field-value is critical information for handling a request, it
2392   &SHOULD; be sent as the first header field following the request-line.
2393</t>
2394<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Host"/>
2395  <x:ref>Host</x:ref> = <x:ref>uri-host</x:ref> [ ":" <x:ref>port</x:ref> ] ; <xref target="http.uri"/>
2396</artwork></figure>
2397<t>
2398   A client &MUST; send a Host header field in all HTTP/1.1 request
2399   messages.  If the target URI includes an authority component, then
2400   the Host field-value &MUST; be identical to that authority component
2401   after excluding any userinfo (<xref target="http.uri"/>).
2402   If the authority component is missing or undefined for the target URI,
2403   then the Host header field &MUST; be sent with an empty field-value.
2404</t>
2405<t>
2406   For example, a GET request to the origin server for
2407   &lt;http://www.example.org/pub/WWW/&gt; would begin with:
2408</t>
2409<figure><artwork type="message/http; msgtype=&#34;request&#34;" x:indent-with="  ">
2410GET /pub/WWW/ HTTP/1.1
2411Host: www.example.org
2412</artwork></figure>
2413<t>
2414   The Host header field &MUST; be sent in an HTTP/1.1 request even
2415   if the request-target is in the absolute-form, since this
2416   allows the Host information to be forwarded through ancient HTTP/1.0
2417   proxies that might not have implemented Host.
2418</t>
2419<t>
2420   When an HTTP/1.1 proxy receives a request with an absolute-form of
2421   request-target, the proxy &MUST; ignore the received
2422   Host header field (if any) and instead replace it with the host
2423   information of the request-target.  If the proxy forwards the request,
2424   it &MUST; generate a new Host field-value based on the received
2425   request-target rather than forward the received Host field-value.
2426</t>
2427<t>
2428   Since the Host header field acts as an application-level routing
2429   mechanism, it is a frequent target for malware seeking to poison
2430   a shared cache or redirect a request to an unintended server.
2431   An interception proxy is particularly vulnerable if it relies on
2432   the Host field-value for redirecting requests to internal
2433   servers, or for use as a cache key in a shared cache, without
2434   first verifying that the intercepted connection is targeting a
2435   valid IP address for that host.
2436</t>
2437<t>
2438   A server &MUST; respond with a <x:ref>400 (Bad Request)</x:ref> status code
2439   to any HTTP/1.1 request message that lacks a Host header field and
2440   to any request message that contains more than one Host header field
2441   or a Host header field with an invalid field-value.
2442</t>
2443</section>
2444
2445<section title="Effective Request URI" anchor="effective.request.uri">
2446  <iref primary="true" item="effective request URI"/>
2447<t>
2448   A server that receives an HTTP request message &MUST; reconstruct
2449   the user agent's original target URI, based on the pieces of information
2450   learned from the request-target, <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header field, and
2451   connection context, in order to identify the intended target resource and
2452   properly service the request. The URI derived from this reconstruction
2453   process is referred to as the "effective request URI".
2454</t>
2455<t>
2456   For a user agent, the effective request URI is the target URI.
2457</t>
2458<t>
2459   If the request-target is in absolute-form, then the effective request URI
2460   is the same as the request-target.  Otherwise, the effective request URI
2461   is constructed as follows.
2462</t>
2463<t>
2464   If the request is received over an SSL/TLS-secured TCP connection,
2465   then the effective request URI's scheme is "https"; otherwise, the
2466   scheme is "http".
2467</t>
2468<t>
2469   If the request-target is in authority-form, then the effective
2470   request URI's authority component is the same as the request-target.
2471   Otherwise, if a <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header field is supplied with a
2472   non-empty field-value, then the authority component is the same as the
2473   Host field-value. Otherwise, the authority component is the concatenation of
2474   the default host name configured for the server, a colon (":"), and the
2475   connection's incoming TCP port number in decimal form.
2476</t>
2477<t>
2478   If the request-target is in authority-form or asterisk-form, then the
2479   effective request URI's combined path and query component is empty.
2480   Otherwise, the combined path and query component is the same as the
2481   request-target.
2482</t>
2483<t>
2484   The components of the effective request URI, once determined as above,
2485   can be combined into absolute-URI form by concatenating the scheme,
2486   "://", authority, and combined path and query component.
2487</t>
2488<figure>
2489<preamble>
2490   Example 1: the following message received over an insecure TCP connection
2491</preamble> 
2492<artwork type="example" x:indent-with="  ">
2493GET /pub/WWW/TheProject.html HTTP/1.1
2494Host: www.example.org:8080
2495</artwork>
2496</figure>
2497<figure>
2498<preamble>
2499  has an effective request URI of
2500</preamble>
2501<artwork type="example" x:indent-with="  ">
2502http://www.example.org:8080/pub/WWW/TheProject.html
2503</artwork>
2504</figure>
2505<figure>
2506<preamble>
2507   Example 2: the following message received over an SSL/TLS-secured TCP
2508   connection
2509</preamble> 
2510<artwork type="example" x:indent-with="  ">
2511OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1
2512Host: www.example.org
2513</artwork>
2514</figure>
2515<figure>
2516<preamble>
2517  has an effective request URI of
2518</preamble>
2519<artwork type="example" x:indent-with="  ">
2520https://www.example.org
2521</artwork>
2522</figure>
2523<t>
2524   An origin server that does not allow resources to differ by requested
2525   host &MAY; ignore the <x:ref>Host</x:ref> field-value and instead replace it
2526   with a configured server name when constructing the effective request URI.
2527</t>
2528<t>
2529   Recipients of an HTTP/1.0 request that lacks a <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header
2530   field &MAY; attempt to use heuristics (e.g., examination of the URI path for
2531   something unique to a particular host) in order to guess the
2532   effective request URI's authority component.
2533</t>
2534</section>
2535
2536<section title="Intermediary Forwarding" anchor="intermediary.forwarding">
2537<t>
2538   As described in <xref target="intermediaries"/>, intermediaries can serve
2539   a variety of roles in the processing of HTTP requests and responses.
2540   Some intermediaries are used to improve performance or availability.
2541   Others are used for access control or to filter content.
2542   Since an HTTP stream has characteristics similar to a pipe-and-filter
2543   architecture, there are no inherent limits to the extent an intermediary
2544   can enhance (or interfere) with either direction of the stream.
2545</t>
2546<t>
2547   In order to avoid request loops, a proxy that forwards requests to other
2548   proxies &MUST; be able to recognize and exclude all of its own server
2549   names, including any aliases, local variations, or literal IP addresses.
2550</t>
2551<t>
2552   If a proxy receives a request-target with a host name that is not a
2553   fully qualified domain name, it &MAY; add its domain to the host name
2554   it received when forwarding the request.  A proxy &MUST-NOT; change the
2555   host name if it is a fully qualified domain name.
2556</t>
2557<t>
2558   A non-transforming proxy &MUST-NOT; rewrite the "path-absolute" and "query"
2559   parts of the received request-target when forwarding it to the next inbound
2560   server, except as noted above to replace an empty path with "/" or "*".
2561</t>
2562<t>
2563   Intermediaries that forward a message &MUST; implement the
2564   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field as specified in
2565   <xref target="header.connection"/>.
2566</t>
2567
2568<section title="End-to-end and Hop-by-hop Header Fields" anchor="end-to-end.and.hop-by-hop.header-fields">
2569<!--<t>
2570  <cref anchor="TODO-end-to-end" source="jre">
2571    Restored from <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-05#section-7.1"/>.
2572    See also <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/60"/>.
2573  </cref>
2574</t>-->
2575<t>
2576   For the purpose of defining the behavior of caches and non-caching
2577   proxies, we divide HTTP header fields into two categories:
2578  <list style="symbols">
2579      <t>End-to-end header fields, which are  transmitted to the ultimate
2580        recipient of a request or response. End-to-end header fields in
2581        responses &MUST; be stored as part of a cache entry and &MUST; be
2582        transmitted in any response formed from a cache entry.</t>
2583
2584      <t>Hop-by-hop header fields, which are meaningful only for a single
2585        transport-level connection, and are not stored by caches or
2586        forwarded by proxies.</t>
2587  </list>
2588</t>
2589<t>
2590   The following HTTP/1.1 header fields are hop-by-hop header fields:
2591  <list style="symbols">
2592      <t><x:ref>Connection</x:ref></t>
2593      <t>Keep-Alive (<xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="of" x:sec="19.7.1.1"/>)</t>
2594      <t><x:ref>Proxy-Authenticate</x:ref> (&header-proxy-authenticate;)</t>
2595      <t><x:ref>Proxy-Authorization</x:ref> (&header-proxy-authorization;)</t>
2596      <t><x:ref>TE</x:ref></t>
2597      <t><x:ref>Trailer</x:ref></t>
2598      <t><x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref></t>
2599      <t><x:ref>Upgrade</x:ref></t>
2600  </list>
2601</t>
2602<t>
2603   All other header fields defined by HTTP/1.1 are end-to-end header fields.
2604</t>
2605<t>
2606   Other hop-by-hop header fields &MUST; be listed in a
2607   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field (<xref target="header.connection"/>).
2608</t>
2609</section>
2610
2611<section title="Non-modifiable Header Fields" anchor="non-modifiable.header-fields">
2612<!--<t>
2613  <cref anchor="TODO-non-mod-headers" source="jre">
2614    Restored from <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-05#section-7.2"/>.
2615    See also <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/60"/>.
2616  </cref>
2617</t>-->
2618<t>
2619   Some features of HTTP/1.1, such as Digest Authentication, depend on the
2620   value of certain end-to-end header fields. A non-transforming proxy &SHOULD-NOT;
2621   modify an end-to-end header field unless the definition of that header field requires
2622   or specifically allows that.
2623</t>
2624<t>
2625   A non-transforming proxy &MUST-NOT; modify any of the following fields in a
2626   request or response, and it &MUST-NOT; add any of these fields if not
2627   already present:
2628  <list style="symbols">
2629    <t>Allow</t>
2630    <t>Content-Location</t>
2631    <t>Content-MD5</t>
2632    <t>ETag</t>
2633    <t>Last-Modified</t>
2634    <t>Server</t>
2635  </list>
2636</t>
2637<t>
2638   A non-transforming proxy &MUST-NOT; modify any of the following fields in a
2639   response:
2640  <list style="symbols">
2641    <t><x:ref>Expires</x:ref> (&header-expires;)</t>
2642  </list>
2643</t>
2644<t>
2645   but it &MAY; add any of these fields if not already present. If an
2646   <x:ref>Expires</x:ref> header field is added, it &MUST; be given a
2647   field value identical to that of the <x:ref>Date</x:ref> header field in
2648   that response.
2649</t>
2650<t>
2651   A proxy &MUST-NOT; modify or add any of the following fields in a
2652   message that contains the no-transform cache-control directive, or in
2653   any request:
2654  <list style="symbols">
2655    <t><x:ref>Content-Encoding</x:ref> (&header-content-encoding;)</t>
2656    <t><x:ref>Content-Range</x:ref> (&header-content-range;)</t>
2657    <t><x:ref>Content-Type</x:ref> (&header-content-type;)</t>
2658  </list>
2659</t>
2660<t>
2661   A transforming proxy &MAY; modify or add these fields to a message
2662   that does not include no-transform, but if it does so, it &MUST; add a
2663   Warning 214 (Transformation applied) if one does not already appear
2664   in the message (see &header-warning;).
2665</t>
2666<x:note>
2667  <t>
2668    <x:h>Warning:</x:h> Unnecessary modification of end-to-end header fields might
2669    cause authentication failures if stronger authentication
2670    mechanisms are introduced in later versions of HTTP. Such
2671    authentication mechanisms &MAY; rely on the values of header fields
2672    not listed here.
2673  </t>
2674</x:note>
2675<t>
2676   A non-transforming proxy &MUST; preserve the message payload (&payload;),
2677   though it &MAY; change the message body through application or removal
2678   of a transfer-coding (<xref target="transfer.codings"/>).
2679</t>
2680</section>
2681
2682</section>
2683
2684<section title="Associating a Response to a Request" anchor="associating.response.to.request">
2685<t>
2686   HTTP does not include a request identifier for associating a given
2687   request message with its corresponding one or more response messages.
2688   Hence, it relies on the order of response arrival to correspond exactly
2689   to the order in which requests are made on the same connection.
2690   More than one response message per request only occurs when one or more
2691   informational responses (<x:ref>1xx</x:ref>, see &status-1xx;) precede a final response
2692   to the same request.
2693</t>
2694<t>
2695   A client that uses persistent connections and sends more than one request
2696   per connection &MUST; maintain a list of outstanding requests in the
2697   order sent on that connection and &MUST; associate each received response
2698   message to the highest ordered request that has not yet received a final
2699   (non-<x:ref>1xx</x:ref>) response.
2700</t>
2701</section>
2702</section>
2703
2704<section title="Connection Management" anchor="connection.management">
2705
2706<section title="Connection" anchor="header.connection">
2707  <iref primary="true" item="Connection header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2708  <iref primary="true" item="Header Fields" subitem="Connection" x:for-anchor=""/>
2709  <x:anchor-alias value="Connection"/>
2710  <x:anchor-alias value="connection-option"/>
2711<t>
2712   The "Connection" header field allows the sender to specify
2713   options that are desired only for that particular connection.
2714   Such connection options &MUST; be removed or replaced before the
2715   message can be forwarded downstream by a proxy or gateway.
2716   This mechanism also allows the sender to indicate which HTTP
2717   header fields used in the message are only intended for the
2718   immediate recipient ("hop-by-hop"), as opposed to all recipients
2719   on the chain ("end-to-end"), enabling the message to be
2720   self-descriptive and allowing future connection-specific extensions
2721   to be deployed in HTTP without fear that they will be blindly
2722   forwarded by previously deployed intermediaries.
2723</t>
2724<t>
2725   The Connection header field's value has the following grammar:
2726</t>
2727<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Connection"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="connection-option"/>
2728  <x:ref>Connection</x:ref>        = 1#<x:ref>connection-option</x:ref>
2729  <x:ref>connection-option</x:ref> = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
2730</artwork></figure>
2731<t>
2732   Connection options are compared case-insensitively.
2733</t>
2734<t>
2735   A proxy or gateway &MUST; parse a received Connection
2736   header field before a message is forwarded and, for each
2737   connection-option in this field, remove any header field(s) from
2738   the message with the same name as the connection-option, and then
2739   remove the Connection header field itself or replace it with the
2740   sender's own connection options for the forwarded message.
2741</t>
2742<t>
2743   A sender &MUST-NOT; include field-names in the Connection header
2744   field-value for fields that are defined as expressing constraints
2745   for all recipients in the request or response chain, such as the
2746   Cache-Control header field (&header-cache-control;).
2747</t>
2748<t>
2749   The connection options do not have to correspond to a header field
2750   present in the message, since a connection-specific header field
2751   might not be needed if there are no parameters associated with that
2752   connection option.  Recipients that trigger certain connection
2753   behavior based on the presence of connection options &MUST; do so
2754   based on the presence of the connection-option rather than only the
2755   presence of the optional header field.  In other words, if the
2756   connection option is received as a header field but not indicated
2757   within the Connection field-value, then the recipient &MUST; ignore
2758   the connection-specific header field because it has likely been
2759   forwarded by an intermediary that is only partially conformant.
2760</t>
2761<t>
2762   When defining new connection options, specifications ought to
2763   carefully consider existing deployed header fields and ensure
2764   that the new connection option does not share the same name as
2765   an unrelated header field that might already be deployed.
2766   Defining a new connection option essentially reserves that potential
2767   field-name for carrying additional information related to the
2768   connection option, since it would be unwise for senders to use
2769   that field-name for anything else.
2770</t>
2771<t>
2772   HTTP/1.1 defines the "close" connection option for the sender to
2773   signal that the connection will be closed after completion of the
2774   response. For example,
2775</t>
2776<figure><artwork type="example">
2777  Connection: close
2778</artwork></figure>
2779<t>
2780   in either the request or the response header fields indicates that
2781   the connection &SHOULD-NOT;  be considered "persistent" (<xref target="persistent.connections"/>)
2782   after the current request/response is complete.
2783</t>
2784<t>
2785   An HTTP/1.1 client that does not support persistent connections &MUST;
2786   include the "close" connection option in every request message.
2787</t>
2788<t>
2789   An HTTP/1.1 server that does not support persistent connections &MUST;
2790   include the "close" connection option in every response message that
2791   does not have a <x:ref>1xx (Informational)</x:ref> status code.
2792</t>
2793</section>
2794
2795<section title="Via" anchor="header.via">
2796  <iref primary="true" item="Via header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
2797  <iref primary="true" item="Header Fields" subitem="Via" x:for-anchor=""/>
2798  <x:anchor-alias value="pseudonym"/>
2799  <x:anchor-alias value="received-by"/>
2800  <x:anchor-alias value="received-protocol"/>
2801  <x:anchor-alias value="Via"/>
2802<t>
2803   The "Via" header field &MUST; be sent by a proxy or gateway to
2804   indicate the intermediate protocols and recipients between the user
2805   agent and the server on requests, and between the origin server and
2806   the client on responses. It is analogous to the "Received" field
2807   used by email systems (<xref target="RFC5322" x:fmt="of" x:sec="3.6.7"/>)
2808   and is intended to be used for tracking message forwards,
2809   avoiding request loops, and identifying the protocol capabilities of
2810   all senders along the request/response chain.
2811</t>
2812<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Via"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="received-protocol"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="protocol-name"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="protocol-version"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="received-by"/><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="pseudonym"/>
2813  <x:ref>Via</x:ref>               = 1#( <x:ref>received-protocol</x:ref> <x:ref>RWS</x:ref> <x:ref>received-by</x:ref>
2814                          [ <x:ref>RWS</x:ref> <x:ref>comment</x:ref> ] )
2815  <x:ref>received-protocol</x:ref> = [ <x:ref>protocol-name</x:ref> "/" ] <x:ref>protocol-version</x:ref>
2816  <x:ref>received-by</x:ref>       = ( <x:ref>uri-host</x:ref> [ ":" <x:ref>port</x:ref> ] ) / <x:ref>pseudonym</x:ref>
2817  <x:ref>pseudonym</x:ref>         = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
2818</artwork></figure>
2819<t>
2820   The received-protocol indicates the protocol version of the message
2821   received by the server or client along each segment of the
2822   request/response chain. The received-protocol version is appended to
2823   the Via field value when the message is forwarded so that information
2824   about the protocol capabilities of upstream applications remains
2825   visible to all recipients.
2826</t>
2827<t>
2828   The protocol-name is excluded if and only if it would be "HTTP". The
2829   received-by field is normally the host and optional port number of a
2830   recipient server or client that subsequently forwarded the message.
2831   However, if the real host is considered to be sensitive information,
2832   it &MAY; be replaced by a pseudonym. If the port is not given, it &MAY;
2833   be assumed to be the default port of the received-protocol.
2834</t>
2835<t>
2836   Multiple Via field values represent each proxy or gateway that has
2837   forwarded the message. Each recipient &MUST; append its information
2838   such that the end result is ordered according to the sequence of
2839   forwarding applications.
2840</t>
2841<t>
2842   Comments &MAY; be used in the Via header field to identify the software
2843   of each recipient, analogous to the <x:ref>User-Agent</x:ref> and
2844   <x:ref>Server</x:ref> header fields. However, all comments in the Via field
2845   are optional and &MAY; be removed by any recipient prior to forwarding the
2846   message.
2847</t>
2848<t>
2849   For example, a request message could be sent from an HTTP/1.0 user
2850   agent to an internal proxy code-named "fred", which uses HTTP/1.1 to
2851   forward the request to a public proxy at p.example.net, which completes
2852   the request by forwarding it to the origin server at www.example.com.
2853   The request received by www.example.com would then have the following
2854   Via header field:
2855</t>
2856<figure><artwork type="example">
2857  Via: 1.0 fred, 1.1 p.example.net (Apache/1.1)
2858</artwork></figure>
2859<t>
2860   A proxy or gateway used as a portal through a network firewall
2861   &SHOULD-NOT; forward the names and ports of hosts within the firewall
2862   region unless it is explicitly enabled to do so. If not enabled, the
2863   received-by host of any host behind the firewall &SHOULD; be replaced
2864   by an appropriate pseudonym for that host.
2865</t>
2866<t>
2867   For organizations that have strong privacy requirements for hiding
2868   internal structures, a proxy or gateway &MAY; combine an ordered
2869   subsequence of Via header field entries with identical received-protocol
2870   values into a single such entry. For example,
2871</t>
2872<figure><artwork type="example">
2873  Via: 1.0 ricky, 1.1 ethel, 1.1 fred, 1.0 lucy
2874</artwork></figure>
2875<t>
2876  could be collapsed to
2877</t>
2878<figure><artwork type="example">
2879  Via: 1.0 ricky, 1.1 mertz, 1.0 lucy
2880</artwork></figure>
2881<t>
2882   Senders &SHOULD-NOT; combine multiple entries unless they are all
2883   under the same organizational control and the hosts have already been
2884   replaced by pseudonyms. Senders &MUST-NOT; combine entries which
2885   have different received-protocol values.
2886</t>
2887</section>
2888
2889<section title="Persistent Connections" anchor="persistent.connections">
2890
2891<section title="Purpose" anchor="persistent.purpose">
2892<t>
2893   Prior to persistent connections, a separate TCP connection was
2894   established for each request, increasing the load on HTTP servers
2895   and causing congestion on the Internet. The use of inline images and
2896   other associated data often requires a client to make multiple
2897   requests of the same server in a short amount of time. Analysis of
2898   these performance problems and results from a prototype
2899   implementation are available <xref target="Pad1995"/> <xref target="Spe"/>. Implementation experience and
2900   measurements of actual HTTP/1.1 implementations show good
2901   results <xref target="Nie1997"/>. Alternatives have also been explored, for example,
2902   T/TCP <xref target="Tou1998"/>.
2903</t>
2904<t>
2905   Persistent HTTP connections have a number of advantages:
2906  <list style="symbols">
2907      <t>
2908        By opening and closing fewer TCP connections, CPU time is saved
2909        in routers and hosts (clients, servers, proxies, gateways,
2910        tunnels, or caches), and memory used for TCP protocol control
2911        blocks can be saved in hosts.
2912      </t>
2913      <t>
2914        HTTP requests and responses can be pipelined on a connection.
2915        Pipelining allows a client to make multiple requests without
2916        waiting for each response, allowing a single TCP connection to
2917        be used much more efficiently, with much lower elapsed time.
2918      </t>
2919      <t>
2920        Network congestion is reduced by reducing the number of packets
2921        caused by TCP opens, and by allowing TCP sufficient time to
2922        determine the congestion state of the network.
2923      </t>
2924      <t>
2925        Latency on subsequent requests is reduced since there is no time
2926        spent in TCP's connection opening handshake.
2927      </t>
2928      <t>
2929        HTTP can evolve more gracefully, since errors can be reported
2930        without the penalty of closing the TCP connection. Clients using
2931        future versions of HTTP might optimistically try a new feature,
2932        but if communicating with an older server, retry with old
2933        semantics after an error is reported.
2934      </t>
2935    </list>
2936</t>
2937<t>
2938   HTTP implementations &SHOULD; implement persistent connections.
2939</t>
2940</section>
2941
2942<section title="Overall Operation" anchor="persistent.overall">
2943<t>
2944   A significant difference between HTTP/1.1 and earlier versions of
2945   HTTP is that persistent connections are the default behavior of any
2946   HTTP connection. That is, unless otherwise indicated, the client
2947   &SHOULD; assume that the server will maintain a persistent connection,
2948   even after error responses from the server.
2949</t>
2950<t>
2951   Persistent connections provide a mechanism by which a client and a
2952   server can signal the close of a TCP connection. This signaling takes
2953   place using the <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field
2954   (<xref target="header.connection"/>). Once a close has been signaled, the
2955   client &MUST-NOT; send any more requests on that
2956   connection.
2957</t>
2958
2959<section title="Negotiation" anchor="persistent.negotiation">
2960<t>
2961   An HTTP/1.1 server &MAY; assume that a HTTP/1.1 client intends to
2962   maintain a persistent connection unless a <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header
2963   field including the connection option "close" was sent in the request. If
2964   the server chooses to close the connection immediately after sending the
2965   response, it &SHOULD; send a Connection header field including the
2966   connection option "close".
2967</t>
2968<t>
2969   An HTTP/1.1 client &MAY; expect a connection to remain open, but would
2970   decide to keep it open based on whether the response from a server
2971   contains a <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field with the connection option
2972   "close". In case the client does not want to maintain a connection for more
2973   than that request, it &SHOULD; send a Connection header field including the
2974   connection option "close".
2975</t>
2976<t>
2977   If either the client or the server sends the "close" option in the
2978   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field, that request becomes the last one
2979   for the connection.
2980</t>
2981<t>
2982   Clients and servers &SHOULD-NOT;  assume that a persistent connection is
2983   maintained for HTTP versions less than 1.1 unless it is explicitly
2984   signaled. See <xref target="compatibility.with.http.1.0.persistent.connections"/> for more information on backward
2985   compatibility with HTTP/1.0 clients.
2986</t>
2987<t>
2988   Each persistent connection applies to only one transport link.
2989</t>
2990<t>
2991   A proxy server &MUST-NOT; establish a HTTP/1.1 persistent connection
2992   with an HTTP/1.0 client (but see <xref x:sec="19.7.1" x:fmt="of" target="RFC2068"/>
2993   for information and discussion of the problems with the Keep-Alive header field
2994   implemented by many HTTP/1.0 clients).
2995</t>
2996<t>
2997   In order to remain persistent, all messages on the connection &MUST;
2998   have a self-defined message length (i.e., one not defined by closure
2999   of the connection), as described in <xref target="message.body"/>.
3000</t>
3001</section>
3002
3003<section title="Pipelining" anchor="pipelining">
3004<t>
3005   A client that supports persistent connections &MAY; "pipeline" its
3006   requests (i.e., send multiple requests without waiting for each
3007   response). A server &MUST; send its responses to those requests in the
3008   same order that the requests were received.
3009</t>
3010<t>
3011   Clients which assume persistent connections and pipeline immediately
3012   after connection establishment &SHOULD; be prepared to retry their
3013   connection if the first pipelined attempt fails. If a client does
3014   such a retry, it &MUST-NOT; pipeline before it knows the connection is
3015   persistent. Clients &MUST; also be prepared to resend their requests if
3016   the server closes the connection before sending all of the
3017   corresponding responses.
3018</t>
3019<t>
3020   Clients &SHOULD-NOT; pipeline requests using non-idempotent request methods or
3021   non-idempotent sequences of request methods (see &idempotent-methods;). Otherwise, a
3022   premature termination of the transport connection could lead to
3023   indeterminate results. A client wishing to send a non-idempotent
3024   request &SHOULD; wait to send that request until it has received the
3025   response status line for the previous request.
3026</t>
3027</section>
3028</section>
3029
3030<section title="Practical Considerations" anchor="persistent.practical">
3031<t>
3032   Servers will usually have some time-out value beyond which they will
3033   no longer maintain an inactive connection. Proxy servers might make
3034   this a higher value since it is likely that the client will be making
3035   more connections through the same server. The use of persistent
3036   connections places no requirements on the length (or existence) of
3037   this time-out for either the client or the server.
3038</t>
3039<t>
3040   When a client or server wishes to time-out it &SHOULD; issue a graceful
3041   close on the transport connection. Clients and servers &SHOULD; both
3042   constantly watch for the other side of the transport close, and
3043   respond to it as appropriate. If a client or server does not detect
3044   the other side's close promptly it could cause unnecessary resource
3045   drain on the network.
3046</t>
3047<t>
3048   A client, server, or proxy &MAY; close the transport connection at any
3049   time. For example, a client might have started to send a new request
3050   at the same time that the server has decided to close the "idle"
3051   connection. From the server's point of view, the connection is being
3052   closed while it was idle, but from the client's point of view, a
3053   request is in progress.
3054</t>
3055<t>
3056   Clients (including proxies) &SHOULD; limit the number of simultaneous
3057   connections that they maintain to a given server (including proxies).
3058</t>
3059<t>
3060   Previous revisions of HTTP gave a specific number of connections as a
3061   ceiling, but this was found to be impractical for many applications. As a
3062   result, this specification does not mandate a particular maximum number of
3063   connections, but instead encourages clients to be conservative when opening
3064   multiple connections.
3065</t>
3066<t>
3067   In particular, while using multiple connections avoids the "head-of-line
3068   blocking" problem (whereby a request that takes significant server-side
3069   processing and/or has a large payload can block subsequent requests on the
3070   same connection), each connection used consumes server resources (sometimes
3071   significantly), and furthermore using multiple connections can cause
3072   undesirable side effects in congested networks.
3073</t>
3074<t>
3075   Note that servers might reject traffic that they deem abusive, including an
3076   excessive number of connections from a client.
3077</t>
3078</section>
3079
3080<section title="Retrying Requests" anchor="persistent.retrying.requests">
3081<t>
3082   Senders can close the transport connection at any time. Therefore,
3083   clients, servers, and proxies &MUST; be able to recover
3084   from asynchronous close events. Client software &MAY; reopen the
3085   transport connection and retransmit the aborted sequence of requests
3086   without user interaction so long as the request sequence is
3087   idempotent (see &idempotent-methods;). Non-idempotent request methods or sequences
3088   &MUST-NOT; be automatically retried, although user agents &MAY; offer a
3089   human operator the choice of retrying the request(s). Confirmation by
3090   user-agent software with semantic understanding of the application
3091   &MAY; substitute for user confirmation. The automatic retry &SHOULD-NOT; 
3092   be repeated if the second sequence of requests fails.
3093</t>
3094</section>
3095</section>
3096
3097<section title="Message Transmission Requirements" anchor="message.transmission.requirements">
3098
3099<section title="Persistent Connections and Flow Control" anchor="persistent.flow">
3100<t>
3101   HTTP/1.1 servers &SHOULD; maintain persistent connections and use TCP's
3102   flow control mechanisms to resolve temporary overloads, rather than
3103   terminating connections with the expectation that clients will retry.
3104   The latter technique can exacerbate network congestion.
3105</t>
3106</section>
3107
3108<section title="Monitoring Connections for Error Status Messages" anchor="persistent.monitor">
3109<t>
3110   An HTTP/1.1 (or later) client sending a message body &SHOULD; monitor
3111   the network connection for an error status code while it is transmitting
3112   the request. If the client sees an error status code, it &SHOULD;
3113   immediately cease transmitting the body. If the body is being sent
3114   using a "chunked" encoding (<xref target="transfer.codings"/>), a zero length chunk and
3115   empty trailer &MAY; be used to prematurely mark the end of the message.
3116   If the body was preceded by a Content-Length header field, the client &MUST;
3117   close the connection.
3118</t>
3119</section>
3120
3121<section title="Use of the 100 (Continue) Status" anchor="use.of.the.100.status">
3122<t>
3123   The purpose of the <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> status code (see &status-100;)
3124   is to allow a client that is sending a request message with a request body
3125   to determine if the origin server is willing to accept the request
3126   (based on the request header fields) before the client sends the request
3127   body. In some cases, it might either be inappropriate or highly
3128   inefficient for the client to send the body if the server will reject
3129   the message without looking at the body.
3130</t>
3131<t>
3132   Requirements for HTTP/1.1 clients:
3133  <list style="symbols">
3134    <t>
3135        If a client will wait for a <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> response before
3136        sending the request body, it &MUST; send an <x:ref>Expect</x:ref> header
3137        field (&header-expect;) with the "100-continue" expectation.
3138    </t>
3139    <t>
3140        A client &MUST-NOT; send an <x:ref>Expect</x:ref> header field with
3141        the "100-continue" expectation if it does not intend to send a request
3142        body.
3143    </t>
3144  </list>
3145</t>
3146<t>
3147   Because of the presence of older implementations, the protocol allows
3148   ambiguous situations in which a client might send "Expect: 100-continue"
3149   without receiving either a <x:ref>417 (Expectation Failed)</x:ref> 
3150   or a <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> status code. Therefore, when a client sends this
3151   header field to an origin server (possibly via a proxy) from which it
3152   has never seen a <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> status code, the client &SHOULD-NOT; 
3153   wait for an indefinite period before sending the request body.
3154</t>
3155<t>
3156   Requirements for HTTP/1.1 origin servers:
3157  <list style="symbols">
3158    <t> Upon receiving a request which includes an <x:ref>Expect</x:ref> header
3159        field with the "100-continue" expectation, an origin server &MUST;
3160        either respond with <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> status code and continue to read
3161        from the input stream, or respond with a final status code. The
3162        origin server &MUST-NOT; wait for the request body before sending
3163        the <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> response. If it responds with a final status
3164        code, it &MAY; close the transport connection or it &MAY; continue
3165        to read and discard the rest of the request.  It &MUST-NOT;
3166        perform the request method if it returns a final status code.
3167    </t>
3168    <t> An origin server &SHOULD-NOT;  send a <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> response if
3169        the request message does not include an <x:ref>Expect</x:ref> header
3170        field with the "100-continue" expectation, and &MUST-NOT; send a
3171        <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> response if such a request comes from an HTTP/1.0
3172        (or earlier) client. There is an exception to this rule: for
3173        compatibility with <xref target="RFC2068"/>, a server &MAY; send a <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref>
3174        status code in response to an HTTP/1.1 PUT or POST request that does
3175        not include an Expect header field with the "100-continue"
3176        expectation. This exception, the purpose of which is
3177        to minimize any client processing delays associated with an
3178        undeclared wait for <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> status code, applies only to
3179        HTTP/1.1 requests, and not to requests with any other HTTP-version
3180        value.
3181    </t>
3182    <t> An origin server &MAY; omit a <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> response if it has
3183        already received some or all of the request body for the
3184        corresponding request.
3185    </t>
3186    <t> An origin server that sends a <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> response &MUST;
3187        ultimately send a final status code, once the request body is
3188        received and processed, unless it terminates the transport
3189        connection prematurely.
3190    </t>
3191    <t> If an origin server receives a request that does not include an
3192        <x:ref>Expect</x:ref> header field with the "100-continue" expectation,
3193        the request includes a request body, and the server responds
3194        with a final status code before reading the entire request body
3195        from the transport connection, then the server &SHOULD-NOT;  close
3196        the transport connection until it has read the entire request,
3197        or until the client closes the connection. Otherwise, the client
3198        might not reliably receive the response message. However, this
3199        requirement ought not be construed as preventing a server from
3200        defending itself against denial-of-service attacks, or from
3201        badly broken client implementations.
3202      </t>
3203    </list>
3204</t>
3205<t>
3206   Requirements for HTTP/1.1 proxies:
3207  <list style="symbols">
3208    <t> If a proxy receives a request that includes an <x:ref>Expect</x:ref>
3209        header field with the "100-continue" expectation, and the proxy
3210        either knows that the next-hop server complies with HTTP/1.1 or
3211        higher, or does not know the HTTP version of the next-hop
3212        server, it &MUST; forward the request, including the Expect header
3213        field.
3214    </t>
3215    <t> If the proxy knows that the version of the next-hop server is
3216        HTTP/1.0 or lower, it &MUST-NOT; forward the request, and it &MUST;
3217        respond with a <x:ref>417 (Expectation Failed)</x:ref> status code.
3218    </t>
3219    <t> Proxies &SHOULD; maintain a record of the HTTP version
3220        numbers received from recently-referenced next-hop servers.
3221    </t>
3222    <t> A proxy &MUST-NOT; forward a <x:ref>100 (Continue)</x:ref> response if the
3223        request message was received from an HTTP/1.0 (or earlier)
3224        client and did not include an <x:ref>Expect</x:ref> header field with
3225        the "100-continue" expectation. This requirement overrides the
3226        general rule for forwarding of <x:ref>1xx</x:ref> responses (see &status-1xx;).
3227    </t>
3228  </list>
3229</t>
3230</section>
3231
3232<section title="Closing Connections on Error" anchor="closing.connections.on.error">
3233<t>
3234   If the client is sending data, a server implementation using TCP
3235   &SHOULD; be careful to ensure that the client acknowledges receipt of
3236   the packet(s) containing the response, before the server closes the
3237   input connection. If the client continues sending data to the server
3238   after the close, the server's TCP stack will send a reset packet to
3239   the client, which might erase the client's unacknowledged input buffers
3240   before they can be read and interpreted by the HTTP application.
3241</t>
3242</section>
3243
3244</section>
3245
3246<section title="Upgrade" anchor="header.upgrade">
3247  <iref primary="true" item="Upgrade header field" x:for-anchor=""/>
3248  <iref primary="true" item="Header Fields" subitem="Upgrade" x:for-anchor=""/>
3249  <x:anchor-alias value="Upgrade"/>
3250  <x:anchor-alias value="protocol"/>
3251  <x:anchor-alias value="protocol-name"/>
3252  <x:anchor-alias value="protocol-version"/>
3253<t>
3254   The "Upgrade" header field allows the client to specify what
3255   additional communication protocols it would like to use, if the server
3256   chooses to switch protocols. Servers can use it to indicate what protocols
3257   they are willing to switch to.
3258</t>
3259<figure><artwork type="abnf2616"><iref primary="true" item="Grammar" subitem="Upgrade"/>
3260  <x:ref>Upgrade</x:ref>          = 1#<x:ref>protocol</x:ref>
3261
3262  <x:ref>protocol</x:ref>         = <x:ref>protocol-name</x:ref> ["/" <x:ref>protocol-version</x:ref>]
3263  <x:ref>protocol-name</x:ref>    = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
3264  <x:ref>protocol-version</x:ref> = <x:ref>token</x:ref>
3265</artwork></figure>
3266<t>
3267   For example,
3268</t>
3269<figure><artwork type="example">
3270  Upgrade: HTTP/2.0, SHTTP/1.3, IRC/6.9, RTA/x11
3271</artwork></figure>
3272<t>
3273   The Upgrade header field is intended to provide a simple mechanism
3274   for transitioning from HTTP/1.1 to some other, incompatible protocol. It
3275   does so by allowing the client to advertise its desire to use another
3276   protocol, such as a later version of HTTP with a higher major version
3277   number, even though the current request has been made using HTTP/1.1.
3278   This eases the difficult transition between incompatible protocols by
3279   allowing the client to initiate a request in the more commonly
3280   supported protocol while indicating to the server that it would like
3281   to use a "better" protocol if available (where "better" is determined
3282   by the server, possibly according to the nature of the request method
3283   or target resource).
3284</t>
3285<t>
3286   The Upgrade header field only applies to switching application-layer
3287   protocols upon the existing transport-layer connection. Upgrade
3288   cannot be used to insist on a protocol change; its acceptance and use
3289   by the server is optional. The capabilities and nature of the
3290   application-layer communication after the protocol change is entirely
3291   dependent upon the new protocol chosen, although the first action
3292   after changing the protocol &MUST; be a response to the initial HTTP
3293   request containing the Upgrade header field.
3294</t>
3295<t>
3296   The Upgrade header field only applies to the immediate connection.
3297   Therefore, the upgrade keyword &MUST; be supplied within a
3298   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref> header field (<xref target="header.connection"/>)
3299   whenever Upgrade is present in an HTTP/1.1 message.
3300</t>
3301<t>
3302   The Upgrade header field cannot be used to indicate a switch to a
3303   protocol on a different connection. For that purpose, it is more
3304   appropriate to use a <x:ref>3xx (Redirection)</x:ref> response (&status-3xx;).
3305</t>
3306<t>
3307   Servers &MUST; include the "Upgrade" header field in <x:ref>101 (Switching
3308   Protocols)</x:ref> responses to indicate which protocol(s) are being switched to,
3309   and &MUST; include it in <x:ref>426 (Upgrade Required)</x:ref> responses to indicate
3310   acceptable protocols to upgrade to. Servers &MAY; include it in any other
3311   response to indicate that they are willing to upgrade to one of the
3312   specified protocols.
3313</t>
3314<t>
3315   This specification only defines the protocol name "HTTP" for use by
3316   the family of Hypertext Transfer Protocols, as defined by the HTTP
3317   version rules of <xref target="http.version"/> and future updates to this
3318   specification. Additional tokens can be registered with IANA using the
3319   registration procedure defined in <xref target="upgrade.token.registry"/>.
3320</t>
3321</section>
3322
3323</section>
3324
3325<section title="IANA Considerations" anchor="IANA.considerations">
3326
3327<section title="Header Field Registration" anchor="header.field.registration">
3328<t>
3329   HTTP header fields are registered within the Message Header Field Registry
3330   <xref target="RFC3864"/> maintained by IANA at
3331   <eref target="http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/message-header-index.html"/>.
3332</t>
3333<t>
3334   This document defines the following HTTP header fields, so their
3335   associated registry entries shall be updated according to the permanent
3336   registrations below:
3337</t>
3338<?BEGININC p1-messaging.iana-headers ?>
3339<!--AUTOGENERATED FROM extract-header-defs.xslt, do not edit manually-->
3340<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true" anchor="iana.header.registration.table">
3341   <ttcol>Header Field Name</ttcol>
3342   <ttcol>Protocol</ttcol>
3343   <ttcol>Status</ttcol>
3344   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3345
3346   <c>Connection</c>
3347   <c>http</c>
3348   <c>standard</c>
3349   <c>
3350      <xref target="header.connection"/>
3351   </c>
3352   <c>Content-Length</c>
3353   <c>http</c>
3354   <c>standard</c>
3355   <c>
3356      <xref target="header.content-length"/>
3357   </c>
3358   <c>Host</c>
3359   <c>http</c>
3360   <c>standard</c>
3361   <c>
3362      <xref target="header.host"/>
3363   </c>
3364   <c>TE</c>
3365   <c>http</c>
3366   <c>standard</c>
3367   <c>
3368      <xref target="header.te"/>
3369   </c>
3370   <c>Trailer</c>
3371   <c>http</c>
3372   <c>standard</c>
3373   <c>
3374      <xref target="header.trailer"/>
3375   </c>
3376   <c>Transfer-Encoding</c>
3377   <c>http</c>
3378   <c>standard</c>
3379   <c>
3380      <xref target="header.transfer-encoding"/>
3381   </c>
3382   <c>Upgrade</c>
3383   <c>http</c>
3384   <c>standard</c>
3385   <c>
3386      <xref target="header.upgrade"/>
3387   </c>
3388   <c>Via</c>
3389   <c>http</c>
3390   <c>standard</c>
3391   <c>
3392      <xref target="header.via"/>
3393   </c>
3394</texttable>
3395<!--(END)-->
3396<?ENDINC p1-messaging.iana-headers ?>
3397<t>
3398   Furthermore, the header field-name "Close" shall be registered as
3399   "reserved", since using that name as an HTTP header field might
3400   conflict with the "close" connection option of the "<x:ref>Connection</x:ref>"
3401   header field (<xref target="header.connection"/>).
3402</t>
3403<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true">
3404   <ttcol>Header Field Name</ttcol>
3405   <ttcol>Protocol</ttcol>
3406   <ttcol>Status</ttcol>
3407   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3408
3409   <c>Close</c>
3410   <c>http</c>
3411   <c>reserved</c>
3412   <c>
3413      <xref target="header.field.registration"/>
3414   </c>
3415</texttable>
3416<t>
3417   The change controller is: "IETF (iesg@ietf.org) - Internet Engineering Task Force".
3418</t>
3419</section>
3420
3421<section title="URI Scheme Registration" anchor="uri.scheme.registration">
3422<t>
3423   IANA maintains the registry of URI Schemes <xref target="RFC4395"/> at
3424   <eref target="http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html"/>.
3425</t>
3426<t>
3427   This document defines the following URI schemes, so their
3428   associated registry entries shall be updated according to the permanent
3429   registrations below:
3430</t>
3431<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true">
3432   <ttcol>URI Scheme</ttcol>
3433   <ttcol>Description</ttcol>
3434   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3435
3436   <c>http</c>
3437   <c>Hypertext Transfer Protocol</c>
3438   <c><xref target="http.uri"/></c>
3439
3440   <c>https</c>
3441   <c>Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure</c>
3442   <c><xref target="https.uri"/></c>
3443</texttable>
3444</section>
3445
3446<section title="Internet Media Type Registrations" anchor="internet.media.type.http">
3447<t>
3448   This document serves as the specification for the Internet media types
3449   "message/http" and "application/http". The following is to be registered with
3450   IANA (see <xref target="RFC4288"/>).
3451</t>
3452<section title="Internet Media Type message/http" anchor="internet.media.type.message.http">
3453<iref item="Media Type" subitem="message/http" primary="true"/>
3454<iref item="message/http Media Type" primary="true"/>
3455<t>
3456   The message/http type can be used to enclose a single HTTP request or
3457   response message, provided that it obeys the MIME restrictions for all
3458   "message" types regarding line length and encodings.
3459</t>
3460<t>
3461  <list style="hanging" x:indent="12em">
3462    <t hangText="Type name:">
3463      message
3464    </t>
3465    <t hangText="Subtype name:">
3466      http
3467    </t>
3468    <t hangText="Required parameters:">
3469      none
3470    </t>
3471    <t hangText="Optional parameters:">
3472      version, msgtype
3473      <list style="hanging">
3474        <t hangText="version:">
3475          The HTTP-version number of the enclosed message
3476          (e.g., "1.1"). If not present, the version can be
3477          determined from the first line of the body.
3478        </t>
3479        <t hangText="msgtype:">
3480          The message type &mdash; "request" or "response". If not
3481          present, the type can be determined from the first
3482          line of the body.
3483        </t>
3484      </list>
3485    </t>
3486    <t hangText="Encoding considerations:">
3487      only "7bit", "8bit", or "binary" are permitted
3488    </t>
3489    <t hangText="Security considerations:">
3490      none
3491    </t>
3492    <t hangText="Interoperability considerations:">
3493      none
3494    </t>
3495    <t hangText="Published specification:">
3496      This specification (see <xref target="internet.media.type.message.http"/>).
3497    </t>
3498    <t hangText="Applications that use this media type:">
3499    </t>
3500    <t hangText="Additional information:">
3501      <list style="hanging">
3502        <t hangText="Magic number(s):">none</t>
3503        <t hangText="File extension(s):">none</t>
3504        <t hangText="Macintosh file type code(s):">none</t>
3505      </list>
3506    </t>
3507    <t hangText="Person and email address to contact for further information:">
3508      See Authors Section.
3509    </t>
3510    <t hangText="Intended usage:">
3511      COMMON
3512    </t>
3513    <t hangText="Restrictions on usage:">
3514      none
3515    </t>
3516    <t hangText="Author/Change controller:">
3517      IESG
3518    </t>
3519  </list>
3520</t>
3521</section>
3522<section title="Internet Media Type application/http" anchor="internet.media.type.application.http">
3523<iref item="Media Type" subitem="application/http" primary="true"/>
3524<iref item="application/http Media Type" primary="true"/>
3525<t>
3526   The application/http type can be used to enclose a pipeline of one or more
3527   HTTP request or response messages (not intermixed).
3528</t>
3529<t>
3530  <list style="hanging" x:indent="12em">
3531    <t hangText="Type name:">
3532      application
3533    </t>
3534    <t hangText="Subtype name:">
3535      http
3536    </t>
3537    <t hangText="Required parameters:">
3538      none
3539    </t>
3540    <t hangText="Optional parameters:">
3541      version, msgtype
3542      <list style="hanging">
3543        <t hangText="version:">
3544          The HTTP-version number of the enclosed messages
3545          (e.g., "1.1"). If not present, the version can be
3546          determined from the first line of the body.
3547        </t>
3548        <t hangText="msgtype:">
3549          The message type &mdash; "request" or "response". If not
3550          present, the type can be determined from the first
3551          line of the body.
3552        </t>
3553      </list>
3554    </t>
3555    <t hangText="Encoding considerations:">
3556      HTTP messages enclosed by this type
3557      are in "binary" format; use of an appropriate
3558      Content-Transfer-Encoding is required when
3559      transmitted via E-mail.
3560    </t>
3561    <t hangText="Security considerations:">
3562      none
3563    </t>
3564    <t hangText="Interoperability considerations:">
3565      none
3566    </t>
3567    <t hangText="Published specification:">
3568      This specification (see <xref target="internet.media.type.application.http"/>).
3569    </t>
3570    <t hangText="Applications that use this media type:">
3571    </t>
3572    <t hangText="Additional information:">
3573      <list style="hanging">
3574        <t hangText="Magic number(s):">none</t>
3575        <t hangText="File extension(s):">none</t>
3576        <t hangText="Macintosh file type code(s):">none</t>
3577      </list>
3578    </t>
3579    <t hangText="Person and email address to contact for further information:">
3580      See Authors Section.
3581    </t>
3582    <t hangText="Intended usage:">
3583      COMMON
3584    </t>
3585    <t hangText="Restrictions on usage:">
3586      none
3587    </t>
3588    <t hangText="Author/Change controller:">
3589      IESG
3590    </t>
3591  </list>
3592</t>
3593</section>
3594</section>
3595
3596<section title="Transfer Coding Registry" anchor="transfer.coding.registry">
3597<t>
3598   The HTTP Transfer Coding Registry defines the name space for transfer
3599   coding names.
3600</t>
3601<t>
3602   Registrations &MUST; include the following fields:
3603   <list style="symbols">
3604     <t>Name</t>
3605     <t>Description</t>
3606     <t>Pointer to specification text</t>
3607   </list>
3608</t>
3609<t>
3610   Names of transfer codings &MUST-NOT; overlap with names of content codings
3611   (&content-codings;) unless the encoding transformation is identical, as it
3612   is the case for the compression codings defined in
3613   <xref target="compression.codings"/>.
3614</t>
3615<t>
3616   Values to be added to this name space require IETF Review (see
3617   <xref target="RFC5226" x:fmt="of" x:sec="4.1"/>), and &MUST;
3618   conform to the purpose of transfer coding defined in this section.
3619</t>
3620<t>
3621   The registry itself is maintained at
3622   <eref target="http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-parameters"/>.
3623</t>
3624</section>
3625
3626<section title="Transfer Coding Registrations" anchor="transfer.coding.registration">
3627<t>
3628   The HTTP Transfer Coding Registry shall be updated with the registrations
3629   below:
3630</t>
3631<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true" anchor="iana.transfer.coding.registration.table">
3632   <ttcol>Name</ttcol>
3633   <ttcol>Description</ttcol>
3634   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3635   <c>chunked</c>
3636   <c>Transfer in a series of chunks</c>
3637   <c>
3638      <xref target="chunked.encoding"/>
3639   </c>
3640   <c>compress</c>
3641   <c>UNIX "compress" program method</c>
3642   <c>
3643      <xref target="compress.coding"/>
3644   </c>
3645   <c>deflate</c>
3646   <c>"deflate" compression mechanism (<xref target="RFC1951"/>) used inside
3647   the "zlib" data format (<xref target="RFC1950"/>)
3648   </c>
3649   <c>
3650      <xref target="deflate.coding"/>
3651   </c>
3652   <c>gzip</c>
3653   <c>Same as GNU zip <xref target="RFC1952"/></c>
3654   <c>
3655      <xref target="gzip.coding"/>
3656   </c>
3657</texttable>
3658</section>
3659
3660<section title="Upgrade Token Registry" anchor="upgrade.token.registry">
3661<t>
3662   The HTTP Upgrade Token Registry defines the name space for protocol-name
3663   tokens used to identify protocols in the <x:ref>Upgrade</x:ref> header
3664   field. Each registered protocol name is associated with contact information
3665   and an optional set of specifications that details how the connection
3666   will be processed after it has been upgraded.
3667</t>
3668<t>
3669   Registrations happen on a "First Come First Served" basis (see
3670   <xref target="RFC5226" x:sec="4.1" x:fmt="of"/>) and are subject to the
3671   following rules:
3672  <list style="numbers">
3673    <t>A protocol-name token, once registered, stays registered forever.</t>
3674    <t>The registration &MUST; name a responsible party for the
3675       registration.</t>
3676    <t>The registration &MUST; name a point of contact.</t>
3677    <t>The registration &MAY; name a set of specifications associated with
3678       that token. Such specifications need not be publicly available.</t>
3679    <t>The registration &SHOULD; name a set of expected "protocol-version"
3680       tokens associated with that token at the time of registration.</t>
3681    <t>The responsible party &MAY; change the registration at any time.
3682       The IANA will keep a record of all such changes, and make them
3683       available upon request.</t>
3684    <t>The IESG &MAY; reassign responsibility for a protocol token.
3685       This will normally only be used in the case when a
3686       responsible party cannot be contacted.</t>
3687  </list>
3688</t>
3689<t>
3690   This registration procedure for HTTP Upgrade Tokens replaces that
3691   previously defined in <xref target="RFC2817" x:fmt="of" x:sec="7.2"/>.
3692</t>
3693</section>
3694
3695<section title="Upgrade Token Registration" anchor="upgrade.token.registration">
3696<t>
3697   The HTTP Upgrade Token Registry shall be updated with the registration
3698   below:
3699</t>
3700<texttable align="left" suppress-title="true">
3701   <ttcol>Value</ttcol>
3702   <ttcol>Description</ttcol>
3703   <ttcol>Expected Version Tokens</ttcol>
3704   <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
3705
3706   <c>HTTP</c>
3707   <c>Hypertext Transfer Protocol</c>
3708   <c>any DIGIT.DIGIT (e.g, "2.0")</c>
3709   <c><xref target="http.version"/></c>
3710</texttable>
3711<t>
3712   The responsible party is: "IETF (iesg@ietf.org) - Internet Engineering Task Force".
3713</t>
3714</section>
3715
3716</section>
3717
3718<section title="Security Considerations" anchor="security.considerations">
3719<t>
3720   This section is meant to inform application developers, information
3721   providers, and users of the security limitations in HTTP/1.1 as
3722   described by this document. The discussion does not include
3723   definitive solutions to the problems revealed, though it does make
3724   some suggestions for reducing security risks.
3725</t>
3726
3727<section title="Personal Information" anchor="personal.information">
3728<t>
3729   HTTP clients are often privy to large amounts of personal information
3730   (e.g., the user's name, location, mail address, passwords, encryption
3731   keys, etc.), and &SHOULD; be very careful to prevent unintentional
3732   leakage of this information.
3733   We very strongly recommend that a convenient interface be provided
3734   for the user to control dissemination of such information, and that
3735   designers and implementors be particularly careful in this area.
3736   History shows that errors in this area often create serious security
3737   and/or privacy problems and generate highly adverse publicity for the
3738   implementor's company.
3739</t>
3740</section>
3741
3742<section title="Abuse of Server Log Information" anchor="abuse.of.server.log.information">
3743<t>
3744   A server is in the position to save personal data about a user's
3745   requests which might identify their reading patterns or subjects of
3746   interest.  In particular, log information gathered at an intermediary
3747   often contains a history of user agent interaction, across a multitude
3748   of sites, that can be traced to individual users.
3749</t>
3750<t>
3751   HTTP log information is confidential in nature; its handling is often
3752   constrained by laws and regulations.  Log information needs to be securely
3753   stored and appropriate guidelines followed for its analysis.
3754   Anonymization of personal information within individual entries helps,
3755   but is generally not sufficient to prevent real log traces from being
3756   re-identified based on correlation with other access characteristics.
3757   As such, access traces that are keyed to a specific client should not
3758   be published even if the key is pseudonymous.
3759</t>
3760<t>
3761   To minimize the risk of theft or accidental publication, log information
3762   should be purged of personally identifiable information, including
3763   user identifiers, IP addresses, and user-provided query parameters,
3764   as soon as that information is no longer necessary to support operational
3765   needs for security, auditing, or fraud control.
3766</t>
3767</section>
3768
3769<section title="Attacks Based On File and Path Names" anchor="attack.pathname">
3770<t>
3771   Implementations of HTTP origin servers &SHOULD; be careful to restrict
3772   the documents returned by HTTP requests to be only those that were
3773   intended by the server administrators. If an HTTP server translates
3774   HTTP URIs directly into file system calls, the server &MUST; take
3775   special care not to serve files that were not intended to be
3776   delivered to HTTP clients. For example, UNIX, Microsoft Windows, and
3777   other operating systems use ".." as a path component to indicate a
3778   directory level above the current one. On such a system, an HTTP
3779   server &MUST; disallow any such construct in the request-target if it
3780   would otherwise allow access to a resource outside those intended to
3781   be accessible via the HTTP server. Similarly, files intended for
3782   reference only internally to the server (such as access control
3783   files, configuration files, and script code) &MUST; be protected from
3784   inappropriate retrieval, since they might contain sensitive
3785   information. Experience has shown that minor bugs in such HTTP server
3786   implementations have turned into security risks.
3787</t>
3788</section>
3789
3790<section title="DNS-related Attacks" anchor="dns.related.attacks">
3791<t>
3792   HTTP clients rely heavily on the Domain Name Service (DNS), and are thus
3793   generally prone to security attacks based on the deliberate misassociation
3794   of IP addresses and DNS names not protected by DNSSec. Clients need to be
3795   cautious in assuming the validity of an IP number/DNS name association unless
3796   the response is protected by DNSSec (<xref target="RFC4033"/>).
3797</t>
3798</section>
3799
3800<section title="Intermediaries and Caching" anchor="attack.intermediaries">
3801<t>
3802   By their very nature, HTTP intermediaries are men-in-the-middle, and
3803   represent an opportunity for man-in-the-middle attacks. Compromise of
3804   the systems on which the intermediaries run can result in serious security
3805   and privacy problems. Intermediaries have access to security-related
3806   information, personal information about individual users and
3807   organizations, and proprietary information belonging to users and
3808   content providers. A compromised intermediary, or an intermediary
3809   implemented or configured without regard to security and privacy
3810   considerations, might be used in the commission of a wide range of
3811   potential attacks.
3812</t>
3813<t>
3814   Intermediaries that contain a shared cache are especially vulnerable
3815   to cache poisoning attacks.
3816</t>
3817<t>
3818   Implementors need to consider the privacy and security
3819   implications of their design and coding decisions, and of the
3820   configuration options they provide to operators (especially the
3821   default configuration).
3822</t>
3823<t>
3824   Users need to be aware that intermediaries are no more trustworthy than
3825   the people who run them; HTTP itself cannot solve this problem.
3826</t>
3827<t>
3828   The judicious use of cryptography, when appropriate, might suffice to
3829   protect against a broad range of security and privacy attacks. Such
3830   cryptography is beyond the scope of the HTTP/1.1 specification.
3831</t>
3832</section>
3833
3834<section title="Protocol Element Size Overflows" anchor="attack.protocol.element.size.overflows">
3835<t>
3836   Because HTTP uses mostly textual, character-delimited fields, attackers can
3837   overflow buffers in implementations, and/or perform a Denial of Service
3838   against implementations that accept fields with unlimited lengths.
3839</t>
3840<t>
3841   To promote interoperability, this specification makes specific
3842   recommendations for minimum size limits on request-line
3843   (<xref target="request.line"/>)
3844   and blocks of header fields (<xref target="header.fields"/>). These are
3845   minimum recommendations, chosen to be supportable even by implementations
3846   with limited resources; it is expected that most implementations will
3847   choose substantially higher limits.
3848</t>
3849<t>
3850   This specification also provides a way for servers to reject messages that
3851   have request-targets that are too long (&status-414;) or request entities
3852   that are too large (&status-4xx;).
3853</t>
3854<t>
3855   Other fields (including but not limited to request methods, response status
3856   phrases, header field-names, and body chunks) &SHOULD; be limited by
3857   implementations carefully, so as to not impede interoperability.
3858</t>
3859</section>
3860</section>
3861
3862<section title="Acknowledgments" anchor="acks">
3863<t>
3864   This edition of HTTP builds on the many contributions that went into
3865   <xref target="RFC1945" format="none">RFC 1945</xref>,
3866   <xref target="RFC2068" format="none">RFC 2068</xref>,
3867   <xref target="RFC2145" format="none">RFC 2145</xref>, and
3868   <xref target="RFC2616" format="none">RFC 2616</xref>, including
3869   substantial contributions made by the previous authors, editors, and
3870   working group chairs: Tim Berners-Lee, Ari Luotonen, Roy T. Fielding,
3871   Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, Jim Gettys, Jeffrey C. Mogul, Larry Masinter,
3872   Paul J. Leach, and Mark Nottingham.
3873   See <xref target="RFC2616" x:fmt="of" x:sec="16"/> for additional
3874   acknowledgements from prior revisions.
3875</t>
3876<t>
3877   Since 1999, the following contributors have helped improve the HTTP
3878   specification by reporting bugs, asking smart questions, drafting or
3879   reviewing text, and evaluating open issues:
3880</t>
3881<?BEGININC acks ?>
3882<t>Adam Barth,
3883Adam Roach,
3884Addison Phillips,
3885Adrian Chadd,
3886Adrien W. de Croy,
3887Alan Ford,
3888Alan Ruttenberg,
3889Albert Lunde,
3890Alek Storm,
3891Alex Rousskov,
3892Alexandre Morgaut,
3893Alexey Melnikov,
3894Alisha Smith,
3895Amichai Rothman,
3896Amit Klein,
3897Amos Jeffries,
3898Andreas Maier,
3899Andreas Petersson,
3900Anne van Kesteren,
3901Anthony Bryan,
3902Asbjorn Ulsberg,
3903Balachander Krishnamurthy,
3904Barry Leiba,
3905Ben Laurie,
3906Benjamin Niven-Jenkins,
3907Bil Corry,
3908Bill Burke,
3909Bjoern Hoehrmann,
3910Bob Scheifler,
3911Boris Zbarsky,
3912Brett Slatkin,
3913Brian Kell,
3914Brian McBarron,
3915Brian Pane,
3916Brian Smith,
3917Bryce Nesbitt,
3918Cameron Heavon-Jones,
3919Carl Kugler,
3920Carsten Bormann,
3921Charles Fry,
3922Chris Newman,
3923Cyrus Daboo,
3924Dale Robert Anderson,
3925Dan Winship,
3926Daniel Stenberg,
3927Dave Cridland,
3928Dave Crocker,
3929Dave Kristol,
3930David Booth,
3931David Singer,
3932David W. Morris,
3933Diwakar Shetty,
3934Dmitry Kurochkin,
3935Drummond Reed,
3936Duane Wessels,
3937Edward Lee,
3938Eliot Lear,
3939Eran Hammer-Lahav,
3940Eric D. Williams,
3941Eric J. Bowman,
3942Eric Lawrence,
3943Eric Rescorla,
3944Erik Aronesty,
3945Florian Weimer,
3946Frank Ellermann,
3947Fred Bohle,
3948Geoffrey Sneddon,
3949Gervase Markham,
3950Greg Wilkins,
3951Harald Tveit Alvestrand,
3952Harry Halpin,
3953Helge Hess,
3954Henrik Nordstrom,
3955Henry S. Thompson,
3956Henry Story,
3957Herbert van de Sompel,
3958Howard Melman,
3959Hugo Haas,
3960Ian Hickson,
3961Ingo Struck,
3962J. Ross Nicoll,
3963James H. Manger,
3964James Lacey,
3965James M. Snell,
3966Jamie Lokier,
3967Jan Algermissen,
3968Jeff Hodges (who came up with the term 'effective Request-URI'),
3969Jeff Walden,
3970Jim Luther,
3971Joe D. Williams,
3972Joe Gregorio,
3973Joe Orton,
3974John C. Klensin,
3975John C. Mallery,
3976John Cowan,
3977John Kemp,
3978John Panzer,
3979John Schneider,
3980John Stracke,
3981John Sullivan,
3982Jonas Sicking,
3983Jonathan Billington,
3984Jonathan Moore,
3985Jonathan Rees,
3986Jordi Ros,
3987Joris Dobbelsteen,
3988Josh Cohen,
3989Julien Pierre,
3990Jungshik Shin,
3991Justin Chapweske,
3992Justin Erenkrantz,
3993Justin James,
3994Kalvinder Singh,
3995Karl Dubost,
3996Keith Hoffman,
3997Keith Moore,
3998Koen Holtman,
3999Konstantin Voronkov,
4000Kris Zyp,
4001Lisa Dusseault,
4002Maciej Stachowiak,
4003Marc Schneider,
4004Marc Slemko,
4005Mark Baker,
4006Mark Pauley,
4007Mark Watson,
4008Markus Isomaki,
4009Markus Lanthaler,
4010Martin J. Duerst,
4011Martin Musatov,
4012Martin Nilsson,
4013Martin Thomson,
4014Matt Lynch,
4015Matthew Cox,
4016Max Clark,
4017Michael Burrows,
4018Michael Hausenblas,
4019Mike Amundsen,
4020Mike Belshe,
4021Mike Kelly,
4022Mike Schinkel,
4023Miles Sabin,
4024Murray S. Kucherawy,
4025Mykyta Yevstifeyev,
4026Nathan Rixham,
4027Nicholas Shanks,
4028Nico Williams,
4029Nicolas Alvarez,
4030Nicolas Mailhot,
4031Noah Slater,
4032Pablo Castro,
4033Pat Hayes,
4034Patrick R. McManus,
4035Paul E. Jones,
4036Paul Hoffman,
4037Paul Marquess,
4038Peter Lepeska,
4039Peter Saint-Andre,
4040Peter Watkins,
4041Phil Archer,
4042Phillip Hallam-Baker,
4043Poul-Henning Kamp,
4044Preethi Natarajan,
4045Ray Polk,
4046Reto Bachmann-Gmuer,
4047Richard Cyganiak,
4048Robert Brewer,
4049Robert Collins,
4050Robert O'Callahan,
4051Robert Olofsson,
4052Robert Sayre,
4053Robert Siemer,
4054Robert de Wilde,
4055Roberto Javier Godoy,
4056Roberto Peon,
4057Ronny Widjaja,
4058S. Mike Dierken,
4059Salvatore Loreto,
4060Sam Johnston,
4061Sam Ruby,
4062Scott Lawrence (who maintained the original issues list),
4063Sean B. Palmer,
4064Shane McCarron,
4065Stefan Eissing,
4066Stefan Tilkov,
4067Stefanos Harhalakis,
4068Stephane Bortzmeyer,
4069Stephen Farrell,
4070Stuart Williams,
4071Subbu Allamaraju,
4072Sylvain Hellegouarch,
4073Tapan Divekar,
4074Ted Hardie,
4075Thomas Broyer,
4076Thomas Nordin,
4077Thomas Roessler,
4078Tim Bray,
4079Tim Morgan,
4080Tim Olsen,
4081Tom Zhou,
4082Travis Snoozy,
4083Tyler Close,
4084Vincent Murphy,
4085Wenbo Zhu,
4086Werner Baumann,
4087Wilbur Streett,
4088Wilfredo Sanchez Vega,
4089William A. Rowe Jr.,
4090William Chan,
4091Willy Tarreau,
4092Xiaoshu Wang,
4093Yaron Goland,
4094Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen,
4095Yoav Nir,
4096Yogesh Bang,
4097Yutaka Oiwa,
4098Zed A. Shaw, and
4099Zhong Yu.
4100</t>
4101<?ENDINC acks ?>
4102</section>
4103
4104</middle>
4105<back>
4106
4107<references title="Normative References">
4108
4109<reference anchor="ISO-8859-1">
4110  <front>
4111    <title>
4112     Information technology -- 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets -- Part 1: Latin alphabet No. 1
4113    </title>
4114    <author>
4115      <organization>International Organization for Standardization</organization>
4116    </author>
4117    <date year="1998"/>
4118  </front>
4119  <seriesInfo name="ISO/IEC" value="8859-1:1998"/>
4120</reference>
4121
4122<reference anchor="Part2">
4123  <front>
4124    <title>HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics, Payload and Content Negotiation</title>
4125    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
4126      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
4127      <address><email>fielding@gbiv.com</email></address>
4128    </author>
4129    <author initials="Y." surname="Lafon" fullname="Yves Lafon" role="editor">
4130      <organization abbrev="W3C">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
4131      <address><email>ylafon@w3.org</email></address>
4132    </author>
4133    <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
4134      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
4135      <address><email>julian.reschke@greenbytes.de</email></address>
4136    </author>
4137    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
4138  </front>
4139  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-&ID-VERSION;"/>
4140  <x:source href="p2-semantics.xml" basename="p2-semantics">
4141    <x:defines>1xx (Informational)</x:defines>
4142    <x:defines>1xx</x:defines>
4143    <x:defines>100 (Continue)</x:defines>
4144    <x:defines>101 (Switching Protocols)</x:defines>
4145    <x:defines>2xx (Successful)</x:defines>
4146    <x:defines>2xx</x:defines>
4147    <x:defines>200 (OK)</x:defines>
4148    <x:defines>204 (No Content)</x:defines>
4149    <x:defines>3xx (Redirection)</x:defines>
4150    <x:defines>3xx</x:defines>
4151    <x:defines>301 (Moved Permanently)</x:defines>
4152    <x:defines>4xx (Client Error)</x:defines>
4153    <x:defines>4xx</x:defines>
4154    <x:defines>400 (Bad Request)</x:defines>
4155    <x:defines>405 (Method Not Allowed)</x:defines>
4156    <x:defines>411 (Length Required)</x:defines>
4157    <x:defines>414 (URI Too Long)</x:defines>
4158    <x:defines>417 (Expectation Failed)</x:defines>
4159    <x:defines>426 (Upgrade Required)</x:defines>
4160    <x:defines>501 (Not Implemented)</x:defines>
4161    <x:defines>502 (Bad Gateway)</x:defines>
4162    <x:defines>505 (HTTP Version Not Supported)</x:defines>
4163    <x:defines>Content-Encoding</x:defines>
4164    <x:defines>Content-Type</x:defines>
4165    <x:defines>Date</x:defines>
4166    <x:defines>Expect</x:defines>
4167    <x:defines>Location</x:defines>
4168    <x:defines>Server</x:defines>
4169    <x:defines>User-Agent</x:defines>
4170  </x:source>
4171</reference>
4172
4173<reference anchor="Part4">
4174  <front>
4175    <title>HTTP/1.1, part 4: Conditional Requests</title>
4176    <author fullname="Roy T. Fielding" initials="R." role="editor" surname="Fielding">
4177      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
4178      <address><email>fielding@gbiv.com</email></address>
4179    </author>
4180    <author fullname="Yves Lafon" initials="Y." role="editor" surname="Lafon">
4181      <organization abbrev="W3C">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
4182      <address><email>ylafon@w3.org</email></address>
4183    </author>
4184    <author fullname="Julian F. Reschke" initials="J. F." role="editor" surname="Reschke">
4185      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
4186      <address><email>julian.reschke@greenbytes.de</email></address>
4187    </author>
4188    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;" />
4189  </front>
4190  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-&ID-VERSION;" />
4191  <x:source basename="p4-conditional" href="p4-conditional.xml">
4192    <x:defines>304 (Not Modified)</x:defines>
4193  </x:source>
4194</reference>
4195
4196<reference anchor="Part5">
4197  <front>
4198    <title>HTTP/1.1, part 5: Range Requests and Partial Responses</title>
4199    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
4200      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
4201      <address><email>fielding@gbiv.com</email></address>
4202    </author>
4203    <author initials="Y." surname="Lafon" fullname="Yves Lafon" role="editor">
4204      <organization abbrev="W3C">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
4205      <address><email>ylafon@w3.org</email></address>
4206    </author>
4207    <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
4208      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
4209      <address><email>julian.reschke@greenbytes.de</email></address>
4210    </author>
4211    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
4212  </front>
4213  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-&ID-VERSION;"/>
4214  <x:source href="p5-range.xml" basename="p5-range">
4215    <x:defines>Content-Range</x:defines>
4216  </x:source>
4217</reference>
4218
4219<reference anchor="Part6">
4220  <front>
4221    <title>HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching</title>
4222    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
4223      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
4224      <address><email>fielding@gbiv.com</email></address>
4225    </author>
4226    <author initials="Y." surname="Lafon" fullname="Yves Lafon" role="editor">
4227      <organization abbrev="W3C">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
4228      <address><email>ylafon@w3.org</email></address>
4229    </author>
4230    <author initials="M." surname="Nottingham" fullname="Mark Nottingham" role="editor">
4231      <organization>Rackspace</organization>
4232      <address><email>mnot@mnot.net</email></address>
4233    </author>
4234    <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
4235      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
4236      <address><email>julian.reschke@greenbytes.de</email></address>
4237    </author>
4238    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
4239  </front>
4240  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-&ID-VERSION;"/>
4241  <x:source href="p6-cache.xml" basename="p6-cache">
4242    <x:defines>Expires</x:defines>
4243  </x:source>
4244</reference>
4245
4246<reference anchor="Part7">
4247  <front>
4248    <title>HTTP/1.1, part 7: Authentication</title>
4249    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding" role="editor">
4250      <organization abbrev="Adobe">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
4251      <address><email>fielding@gbiv.com</email></address>
4252    </author>
4253    <author initials="Y." surname="Lafon" fullname="Yves Lafon" role="editor">
4254      <organization abbrev="W3C">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
4255      <address><email>ylafon@w3.org</email></address>
4256    </author>
4257    <author initials="J. F." surname="Reschke" fullname="Julian F. Reschke" role="editor">
4258      <organization abbrev="greenbytes">greenbytes GmbH</organization>
4259      <address><email>julian.reschke@greenbytes.de</email></address>
4260    </author>
4261    <date month="&ID-MONTH;" year="&ID-YEAR;"/>
4262  </front>
4263  <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-&ID-VERSION;"/>
4264  <x:source href="p7-auth.xml" basename="p7-auth">
4265    <x:defines>Proxy-Authenticate</x:defines>
4266    <x:defines>Proxy-Authorization</x:defines>
4267  </x:source>
4268</reference>
4269
4270<reference anchor="RFC5234">
4271  <front>
4272    <title abbrev="ABNF for Syntax Specifications">Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF</title>
4273    <author initials="D." surname="Crocker" fullname="Dave Crocker" role="editor">
4274      <organization>Brandenburg InternetWorking</organization>
4275      <address>
4276        <email>dcrocker@bbiw.net</email>
4277      </address> 
4278    </author>
4279    <author initials="P." surname="Overell" fullname="Paul Overell">
4280      <organization>THUS plc.</organization>
4281      <address>
4282        <email>paul.overell@thus.net</email>
4283      </address>
4284    </author>
4285    <date month="January" year="2008"/>
4286  </front>
4287  <seriesInfo name="STD" value="68"/>
4288  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5234"/>
4289</reference>
4290
4291<reference anchor="RFC2119">
4292  <front>
4293    <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
4294    <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="Scott Bradner">
4295      <organization>Harvard University</organization>
4296      <address><email>sob@harvard.edu</email></address>
4297    </author>
4298    <date month="March" year="1997"/>
4299  </front>
4300  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
4301  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
4302</reference>
4303
4304<reference anchor="RFC3986">
4305 <front>
4306  <title abbrev='URI Generic Syntax'>Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax</title>
4307  <author initials='T.' surname='Berners-Lee' fullname='Tim Berners-Lee'>
4308    <organization abbrev="W3C/MIT">World Wide Web Consortium</organization>
4309    <address>
4310       <email>timbl@w3.org</email>
4311       <uri>http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/</uri>
4312    </address>
4313  </author>
4314  <author initials='R.' surname='Fielding' fullname='Roy T. Fielding'>
4315    <organization abbrev="Day Software">Day Software</organization>
4316    <address>
4317      <email>fielding@gbiv.com</email>
4318      <uri>http://roy.gbiv.com/</uri>
4319    </address>
4320  </author>
4321  <author initials='L.' surname='Masinter' fullname='Larry Masinter'>
4322    <organization abbrev="Adobe Systems">Adobe Systems Incorporated</organization>
4323    <address>
4324      <email>LMM@acm.org</email>
4325      <uri>http://larry.masinter.net/</uri>
4326    </address>
4327  </author>
4328  <date month='January' year='2005'></date>
4329 </front>
4330 <seriesInfo name="STD" value="66"/>
4331 <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3986"/>
4332</reference>
4333
4334<reference anchor="USASCII">
4335  <front>
4336    <title>Coded Character Set -- 7-bit American Standard Code for Information Interchange</title>
4337    <author>
4338      <organization>American National Standards Institute</organization>
4339    </author>
4340    <date year="1986"/>
4341  </front>
4342  <seriesInfo name="ANSI" value="X3.4"/>
4343</reference>
4344
4345<reference anchor="RFC1950">
4346  <front>
4347    <title>ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3</title>
4348    <author initials="L.P." surname="Deutsch" fullname="L. Peter Deutsch">
4349      <organization>Aladdin Enterprises</organization>
4350      <address><email>ghost@aladdin.com</email></address>
4351    </author>
4352    <author initials="J-L." surname="Gailly" fullname="Jean-Loup Gailly"/>
4353    <date month="May" year="1996"/>
4354  </front>
4355  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1950"/>
4356  <!--<annotation>
4357    RFC 1950 is an Informational RFC, thus it might be less stable than
4358    this specification. On the other hand, this downward reference was
4359    present since the publication of <xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="none">RFC 2068</xref> in 1997,
4360    therefore it is unlikely to cause problems in practice. See also
4361    <xref target="BCP97"/>.
4362  </annotation>-->
4363</reference>
4364
4365<reference anchor="RFC1951">
4366  <front>
4367    <title>DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3</title>
4368    <author initials="P." surname="Deutsch" fullname="L. Peter Deutsch">
4369      <organization>Aladdin Enterprises</organization>
4370      <address><email>ghost@aladdin.com</email></address>
4371    </author>
4372    <date month="May" year="1996"/>
4373  </front>
4374  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1951"/>
4375  <!--<annotation>
4376    RFC 1951 is an Informational RFC, thus it might be less stable than
4377    this specification. On the other hand, this downward reference was
4378    present since the publication of <xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="none">RFC 2068</xref> in 1997,
4379    therefore it is unlikely to cause problems in practice. See also
4380    <xref target="BCP97"/>.
4381  </annotation>-->
4382</reference>
4383
4384<reference anchor="RFC1952">
4385  <front>
4386    <title>GZIP file format specification version 4.3</title>
4387    <author initials="P." surname="Deutsch" fullname="L. Peter Deutsch">
4388      <organization>Aladdin Enterprises</organization>
4389      <address><email>ghost@aladdin.com</email></address>
4390    </author>
4391    <author initials="J-L." surname="Gailly" fullname="Jean-Loup Gailly">
4392      <address><email>gzip@prep.ai.mit.edu</email></address>
4393    </author>
4394    <author initials="M." surname="Adler" fullname="Mark Adler">
4395      <address><email>madler@alumni.caltech.edu</email></address>
4396    </author>
4397    <author initials="L.P." surname="Deutsch" fullname="L. Peter Deutsch">
4398      <address><email>ghost@aladdin.com</email></address>
4399    </author>
4400    <author initials="G." surname="Randers-Pehrson" fullname="Glenn Randers-Pehrson">
4401      <address><email>randeg@alumni.rpi.edu</email></address>
4402    </author>
4403    <date month="May" year="1996"/>
4404  </front>
4405  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1952"/>
4406  <!--<annotation>
4407    RFC 1952 is an Informational RFC, thus it might be less stable than
4408    this specification. On the other hand, this downward reference was
4409    present since the publication of <xref target="RFC2068" x:fmt="none">RFC 2068</xref> in 1997,
4410    therefore it is unlikely to cause problems in practice. See also
4411    <xref target="BCP97"/>.
4412  </annotation>-->
4413</reference>
4414
4415</references>
4416
4417<references title="Informative References">
4418
4419<reference anchor="Nie1997" target="http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/263105.263157">
4420  <front>
4421    <title>Network Performance Effects of HTTP/1.1, CSS1, and PNG</title>
4422    <author initials="H." surname="Frystyk" fullname="Henrik Frystyk Nielsen"/>
4423    <author initials="J." surname="Gettys" fullname="J. Gettys"/>
4424    <author initials="E." surname="Prud'hommeaux" fullname="E. Prud'hommeaux"/>
4425    <author initials="H." surname="Lie" fullname="H. Lie"/>
4426    <author initials="C." surname="Lilley" fullname="C. Lilley"/>
4427    <date year="1997" month="September"/>
4428  </front>
4429  <seriesInfo name="ACM" value="Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '97 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication SIGCOMM '97"/>
4430</reference>
4431
4432<reference anchor="Pad1995" target="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=219094">
4433  <front>
4434    <title>Improving HTTP Latency</title>
4435    <author initials="V.N." surname="Padmanabhan" fullname="Venkata N. Padmanabhan"/>
4436    <author initials="J.C." surname="Mogul" fullname="Jeffrey C. Mogul"/>
4437    <date year="1995" month="December"/>
4438  </front>
4439  <seriesInfo name="Computer Networks and ISDN Systems" value="v. 28, pp. 25-35"/>
4440</reference>
4441
4442<reference anchor='RFC1919'>
4443  <front>
4444    <title>Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies</title>
4445    <author initials='M.' surname='Chatel' fullname='Marc Chatel'>
4446      <address><email>mchatel@pax.eunet.ch</email></address>
4447    </author>
4448    <date year='1996' month='March' />
4449  </front>
4450  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='1919' />
4451</reference>
4452
4453<reference anchor="RFC1945">
4454  <front>
4455    <title abbrev="HTTP/1.0">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0</title>
4456    <author initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee" fullname="Tim Berners-Lee">
4457      <organization>MIT, Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4458      <address><email>timbl@w3.org</email></address>
4459    </author>
4460    <author initials="R.T." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding">
4461      <organization>University of California, Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science</organization>
4462      <address><email>fielding@ics.uci.edu</email></address>
4463    </author>
4464    <author initials="H.F." surname="Nielsen" fullname="Henrik Frystyk Nielsen">
4465      <organization>W3 Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4466      <address><email>frystyk@w3.org</email></address>
4467    </author>
4468    <date month="May" year="1996"/>
4469  </front>
4470  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1945"/>
4471</reference>
4472
4473<reference anchor="RFC2045">
4474  <front>
4475    <title abbrev="Internet Message Bodies">Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies</title>
4476    <author initials="N." surname="Freed" fullname="Ned Freed">
4477      <organization>Innosoft International, Inc.</organization>
4478      <address><email>ned@innosoft.com</email></address>
4479    </author>
4480    <author initials="N.S." surname="Borenstein" fullname="Nathaniel S. Borenstein">
4481      <organization>First Virtual Holdings</organization>
4482      <address><email>nsb@nsb.fv.com</email></address>
4483    </author>
4484    <date month="November" year="1996"/>
4485  </front>
4486  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2045"/>
4487</reference>
4488
4489<reference anchor="RFC2047">
4490  <front>
4491    <title abbrev="Message Header Extensions">MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text</title>
4492    <author initials="K." surname="Moore" fullname="Keith Moore">
4493      <organization>University of Tennessee</organization>
4494      <address><email>moore@cs.utk.edu</email></address>
4495    </author>
4496    <date month="November" year="1996"/>
4497  </front>
4498  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2047"/>
4499</reference>
4500
4501<reference anchor="RFC2068">
4502  <front>
4503    <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</title>
4504    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding">
4505      <organization>University of California, Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science</organization>
4506      <address><email>fielding@ics.uci.edu</email></address>
4507    </author>
4508    <author initials="J." surname="Gettys" fullname="Jim Gettys">
4509      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4510      <address><email>jg@w3.org</email></address>
4511    </author>
4512    <author initials="J." surname="Mogul" fullname="Jeffrey C. Mogul">
4513      <organization>Digital Equipment Corporation, Western Research Laboratory</organization>
4514      <address><email>mogul@wrl.dec.com</email></address>
4515    </author>
4516    <author initials="H." surname="Nielsen" fullname="Henrik Frystyk Nielsen">
4517      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4518      <address><email>frystyk@w3.org</email></address>
4519    </author>
4520    <author initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee" fullname="Tim Berners-Lee">
4521      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4522      <address><email>timbl@w3.org</email></address>
4523    </author>
4524    <date month="January" year="1997"/>
4525  </front>
4526  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2068"/>
4527</reference>
4528
4529<reference anchor="RFC2145">
4530  <front>
4531    <title abbrev="HTTP Version Numbers">Use and Interpretation of HTTP Version Numbers</title>
4532    <author initials="J.C." surname="Mogul" fullname="Jeffrey C. Mogul">
4533      <organization>Western Research Laboratory</organization>
4534      <address><email>mogul@wrl.dec.com</email></address>
4535    </author>
4536    <author initials="R.T." surname="Fielding" fullname="Roy T. Fielding">
4537      <organization>Department of Information and Computer Science</organization>
4538      <address><email>fielding@ics.uci.edu</email></address>
4539    </author>
4540    <author initials="J." surname="Gettys" fullname="Jim Gettys">
4541      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4542      <address><email>jg@w3.org</email></address>
4543    </author>
4544    <author initials="H.F." surname="Nielsen" fullname="Henrik Frystyk Nielsen">
4545      <organization>W3 Consortium</organization>
4546      <address><email>frystyk@w3.org</email></address>
4547    </author>
4548    <date month="May" year="1997"/>
4549  </front>
4550  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2145"/>
4551</reference>
4552
4553<reference anchor="RFC2616">
4554  <front>
4555    <title>Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</title>
4556    <author initials="R." surname="Fielding" fullname="R. Fielding">
4557      <organization>University of California, Irvine</organization>
4558      <address><email>fielding@ics.uci.edu</email></address>
4559    </author>
4560    <author initials="J." surname="Gettys" fullname="J. Gettys">
4561      <organization>W3C</organization>
4562      <address><email>jg@w3.org</email></address>
4563    </author>
4564    <author initials="J." surname="Mogul" fullname="J. Mogul">
4565      <organization>Compaq Computer Corporation</organization>
4566      <address><email>mogul@wrl.dec.com</email></address>
4567    </author>
4568    <author initials="H." surname="Frystyk" fullname="H. Frystyk">
4569      <organization>MIT Laboratory for Computer Science</organization>
4570      <address><email>frystyk@w3.org</email></address>
4571    </author>
4572    <author initials="L." surname="Masinter" fullname="L. Masinter">
4573      <organization>Xerox Corporation</organization>
4574      <address><email>masinter@parc.xerox.com</email></address>
4575    </author>
4576    <author initials="P." surname="Leach" fullname="P. Leach">
4577      <organization>Microsoft Corporation</organization>
4578      <address><email>paulle@microsoft.com</email></address>
4579    </author>
4580    <author initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee" fullname="T. Berners-Lee">
4581      <organization>W3C</organization>
4582      <address><email>timbl@w3.org</email></address>
4583    </author>
4584    <date month="June" year="1999"/>
4585  </front>
4586  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2616"/>
4587</reference>
4588
4589<reference anchor='RFC2817'>
4590  <front>
4591    <title>Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1</title>
4592    <author initials='R.' surname='Khare' fullname='R. Khare'>
4593      <organization>4K Associates / UC Irvine</organization>
4594      <address><email>rohit@4K-associates.com</email></address>
4595    </author>
4596    <author initials='S.' surname='Lawrence' fullname='S. Lawrence'>
4597      <organization>Agranat Systems, Inc.</organization>
4598      <address><email>lawrence@agranat.com</email></address>
4599    </author>
4600    <date year='2000' month='May' />
4601  </front>
4602  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='2817' />
4603</reference>
4604
4605<reference anchor='RFC2818'>
4606  <front>
4607    <title>HTTP Over TLS</title>
4608    <author initials='E.' surname='Rescorla' fullname='Eric Rescorla'>
4609      <organization>RTFM, Inc.</organization>
4610      <address><email>ekr@rtfm.com</email></address>
4611    </author>
4612    <date year='2000' month='May' />
4613  </front>
4614  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='2818' />
4615</reference>
4616
4617<reference anchor='RFC2965'>
4618  <front>
4619    <title>HTTP State Management Mechanism</title>
4620    <author initials='D. M.' surname='Kristol' fullname='David M. Kristol'>
4621      <organization>Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies</organization>
4622      <address><email>dmk@bell-labs.com</email></address>
4623    </author>
4624    <author initials='L.' surname='Montulli' fullname='Lou Montulli'>
4625      <organization>Epinions.com, Inc.</organization>
4626      <address><email>lou@montulli.org</email></address>
4627    </author>
4628    <date year='2000' month='October' />
4629  </front>
4630  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='2965' />
4631</reference>
4632
4633<reference anchor='RFC3040'>
4634  <front>
4635    <title>Internet Web Replication and Caching Taxonomy</title>
4636    <author initials='I.' surname='Cooper' fullname='I. Cooper'>
4637      <organization>Equinix, Inc.</organization>
4638    </author>
4639    <author initials='I.' surname='Melve' fullname='I. Melve'>
4640      <organization>UNINETT</organization>
4641    </author>
4642    <author initials='G.' surname='Tomlinson' fullname='G. Tomlinson'>
4643      <organization>CacheFlow Inc.</organization>
4644    </author>
4645    <date year='2001' month='January' />
4646  </front>
4647  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='3040' />
4648</reference>
4649
4650<reference anchor='RFC3864'>
4651  <front>
4652    <title>Registration Procedures for Message Header Fields</title>
4653    <author initials='G.' surname='Klyne' fullname='G. Klyne'>
4654      <organization>Nine by Nine</organization>
4655      <address><email>GK-IETF@ninebynine.org</email></address>
4656    </author>
4657    <author initials='M.' surname='Nottingham' fullname='M. Nottingham'>
4658      <organization>BEA Systems</organization>
4659      <address><email>mnot@pobox.com</email></address>
4660    </author>
4661    <author initials='J.' surname='Mogul' fullname='J. Mogul'>
4662      <organization>HP Labs</organization>
4663      <address><email>JeffMogul@acm.org</email></address>
4664    </author>
4665    <date year='2004' month='September' />
4666  </front>
4667  <seriesInfo name='BCP' value='90' />
4668  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='3864' />
4669</reference>
4670
4671<reference anchor='RFC4033'>
4672  <front>
4673    <title>DNS Security Introduction and Requirements</title>
4674    <author initials='R.' surname='Arends' fullname='R. Arends'/>
4675    <author initials='R.' surname='Austein' fullname='R. Austein'/>
4676    <author initials='M.' surname='Larson' fullname='M. Larson'/>
4677    <author initials='D.' surname='Massey' fullname='D. Massey'/>
4678    <author initials='S.' surname='Rose' fullname='S. Rose'/>
4679    <date year='2005' month='March' />
4680  </front>
4681  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4033' />
4682</reference>
4683
4684<reference anchor="RFC4288">
4685  <front>
4686    <title>Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures</title>
4687    <author initials="N." surname="Freed" fullname="N. Freed">
4688      <organization>Sun Microsystems</organization>
4689      <address>
4690        <email>ned.freed@mrochek.com</email>
4691      </address>
4692    </author>
4693    <author initials="J." surname="Klensin" fullname="J. Klensin">
4694      <address>
4695        <email>klensin+ietf@jck.com</email>
4696      </address>
4697    </author>
4698    <date year="2005" month="December"/>
4699  </front>
4700  <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="13"/>
4701  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4288"/>
4702</reference>
4703
4704<reference anchor='RFC4395'>
4705  <front>
4706    <title>Guidelines and Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes</title>
4707    <author initials='T.' surname='Hansen' fullname='T. Hansen'>
4708      <organization>AT&amp;T Laboratories</organization>
4709      <address>
4710        <email>tony+urireg@maillennium.att.com</email>
4711      </address>
4712    </author>
4713    <author initials='T.' surname='Hardie' fullname='T. Hardie'>
4714      <organization>Qualcomm, Inc.</organization>
4715      <address>
4716        <email>hardie@qualcomm.com</email>
4717      </address>
4718    </author>
4719    <author initials='L.' surname='Masinter' fullname='L. Masinter'>
4720      <organization>Adobe Systems</organization>
4721      <address>
4722        <email>LMM@acm.org</email>
4723      </address>
4724    </author>
4725    <date year='2006' month='February' />
4726  </front>
4727  <seriesInfo name='BCP' value='115' />
4728  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4395' />
4729</reference>
4730
4731<reference anchor='RFC4559'>
4732  <front>
4733    <title>SPNEGO-based Kerberos and NTLM HTTP Authentication in Microsoft Windows</title>
4734    <author initials='K.' surname='Jaganathan' fullname='K. Jaganathan'/>
4735    <author initials='L.' surname='Zhu' fullname='L. Zhu'/>
4736    <author initials='J.' surname='Brezak' fullname='J. Brezak'/>
4737    <date year='2006' month='June' />
4738  </front>
4739  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4559' />
4740</reference>
4741
4742<reference anchor='RFC5226'>
4743  <front>
4744    <title>Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs</title>
4745    <author initials='T.' surname='Narten' fullname='T. Narten'>
4746      <organization>IBM</organization>
4747      <address><email>narten@us.ibm.com</email></address>
4748    </author>
4749    <author initials='H.' surname='Alvestrand' fullname='H. Alvestrand'>
4750      <organization>Google</organization>
4751      <address><email>Harald@Alvestrand.no</email></address>
4752    </author>
4753    <date year='2008' month='May' />
4754  </front>
4755  <seriesInfo name='BCP' value='26' />
4756  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='5226' />
4757</reference>
4758
4759<reference anchor="RFC5322">
4760  <front>
4761    <title>Internet Message Format</title>
4762    <author initials="P." surname="Resnick" fullname="P. Resnick">
4763      <organization>Qualcomm Incorporated</organization>
4764    </author>
4765    <date year="2008" month="October"/>
4766  </front> 
4767  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5322"/>
4768</reference>
4769
4770<reference anchor="RFC6265">
4771  <front>
4772    <title>HTTP State Management Mechanism</title>
4773    <author initials="A." surname="Barth" fullname="Adam Barth">
4774      <organization abbrev="U.C. Berkeley">
4775        University of California, Berkeley
4776      </organization>
4777      <address><email>abarth@eecs.berkeley.edu</email></address>
4778    </author>
4779    <date year="2011" month="April" />
4780  </front>
4781  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6265"/>
4782</reference>
4783
4784<!--<reference anchor='BCP97'>
4785  <front>
4786    <title>Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents</title>
4787    <author initials='J.' surname='Klensin' fullname='J. Klensin'>
4788      <address>
4789        <email>klensin+ietf@jck.com</email>
4790      </address>
4791    </author>
4792    <author initials='S.' surname='Hartman' fullname='S. Hartman'>
4793      <organization>MIT</organization>
4794      <address>
4795        <email>hartmans-ietf@mit.edu</email>
4796      </address>
4797    </author>
4798    <date year='2007' month='June' />
4799  </front>
4800  <seriesInfo name='BCP' value='97' />
4801  <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4897' />
4802</reference>-->
4803
4804<reference anchor="Kri2001" target="http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.SE/0105018">
4805  <front>
4806    <title>HTTP Cookies: Standards, Privacy, and Politics</title>
4807    <author initials="D." surname="Kristol" fullname="David M. Kristol"/>
4808    <date year="2001" month="November"/>
4809  </front>
4810  <seriesInfo name="ACM Transactions on Internet Technology" value="Vol. 1, #2"/>
4811</reference>
4812
4813<reference anchor="Spe" target="http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdma-release/http-prob.html">
4814  <front>
4815    <title>Analysis of HTTP Performance Problems</title>
4816    <author initials="S." surname="Spero" fullname="Simon E. Spero"/>
4817    <date/>
4818  </front>
4819</reference>
4820
4821<reference anchor="Tou1998" target="http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/http-perf96/">
4822  <front>
4823  <title>Analysis of HTTP Performance</title>
4824  <author initials="J." surname="Touch" fullname="Joe Touch">
4825    <organization>USC/Information Sciences Institute</organization>
4826    <address><email>touch@isi.edu</email></address>
4827  </author>
4828  <author initials="J." surname="Heidemann" fullname="John Heidemann">
4829    <organization>USC/Information Sciences Institute</organization>
4830    <address><email>johnh@isi.edu</email></address>
4831  </author>
4832  <author initials="K." surname="Obraczka" fullname="Katia Obraczka">
4833    <organization>USC/Information Sciences Institute</organization>
4834    <address><email>katia@isi.edu</email></address>
4835  </author>
4836  <date year="1998" month="Aug"/>
4837  </front>
4838  <seriesInfo name="ISI Research Report" value="ISI/RR-98-463"/>
4839  <annotation>(original report dated Aug. 1996)</annotation>
4840</reference>
4841
4842</references>
4843
4844
4845<section title="HTTP Version History" anchor="compatibility">
4846<t>
4847   HTTP has been in use by the World-Wide Web global information initiative
4848   since 1990. The first version of HTTP, later referred to as HTTP/0.9,
4849   was a simple protocol for hypertext data transfer across the Internet
4850   with only a single request method (GET) and no metadata.
4851   HTTP/1.0, as defined by <xref target="RFC1945"/>, added a range of request
4852   methods and MIME-like messaging that could include metadata about the data
4853   transferred and modifiers on the request/response semantics. However,
4854   HTTP/1.0 did not sufficiently take into consideration the effects of
4855   hierarchical proxies, caching, the need for persistent connections, or
4856   name-based virtual hosts. The proliferation of incompletely-implemented
4857   applications calling themselves "HTTP/1.0" further necessitated a
4858   protocol version change in order for two communicating applications
4859   to determine each other's true capabilities.
4860</t>
4861<t>
4862   HTTP/1.1 remains compatible with HTTP/1.0 by including more stringent
4863   requirements that enable reliable implementations, adding only
4864   those new features that will either be safely ignored by an HTTP/1.0
4865   recipient or only sent when communicating with a party advertising
4866   conformance with HTTP/1.1.
4867</t>
4868<t>
4869   It is beyond the scope of a protocol specification to mandate
4870   conformance with previous versions. HTTP/1.1 was deliberately
4871   designed, however, to make supporting previous versions easy.
4872   We would expect a general-purpose HTTP/1.1 server to understand
4873   any valid request in the format of HTTP/1.0 and respond appropriately
4874   with an HTTP/1.1 message that only uses features understood (or
4875   safely ignored) by HTTP/1.0 clients.  Likewise, we would expect
4876   an HTTP/1.1 client to understand any valid HTTP/1.0 response.
4877</t>
4878<t>
4879   Since HTTP/0.9 did not support header fields in a request,
4880   there is no mechanism for it to support name-based virtual
4881   hosts (selection of resource by inspection of the <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header
4882   field).  Any server that implements name-based virtual hosts
4883   ought to disable support for HTTP/0.9.  Most requests that
4884   appear to be HTTP/0.9 are, in fact, badly constructed HTTP/1.x
4885   requests wherein a buggy client failed to properly encode
4886   linear whitespace found in a URI reference and placed in
4887   the request-target.
4888</t>
4889
4890<section title="Changes from HTTP/1.0" anchor="changes.from.1.0">
4891<t>
4892   This section summarizes major differences between versions HTTP/1.0
4893   and HTTP/1.1.
4894</t>
4895
4896<section title="Multi-homed Web Servers" anchor="changes.to.simplify.multi-homed.web.servers.and.conserve.ip.addresses">
4897<t>
4898   The requirements that clients and servers support the <x:ref>Host</x:ref>
4899   header field (<xref target="header.host"/>), report an error if it is
4900   missing from an HTTP/1.1 request, and accept absolute URIs (<xref target="request-target"/>)
4901   are among the most important changes defined by HTTP/1.1.
4902</t>
4903<t>
4904   Older HTTP/1.0 clients assumed a one-to-one relationship of IP
4905   addresses and servers; there was no other established mechanism for
4906   distinguishing the intended server of a request than the IP address
4907   to which that request was directed. The <x:ref>Host</x:ref> header field was
4908   introduced during the development of HTTP/1.1 and, though it was
4909   quickly implemented by most HTTP/1.0 browsers, additional requirements
4910   were placed on all HTTP/1.1 requests in order to ensure complete
4911   adoption.  At the time of this writing, most HTTP-based services
4912   are dependent upon the Host header field for targeting requests.
4913</t>
4914</section>
4915
4916<section title="Keep-Alive Connections" anchor="compatibility.with.http.1.0.persistent.connections">
4917<t>
4918   In HTTP/1.0, each connection is established by the client prior to the
4919   request and closed by the server after sending the response. However, some
4920   implementations implement the explicitly negotiated ("Keep-Alive") version
4921   of persistent connections described in <xref x:sec="19.7.1" x:fmt="of"
4922   target="RFC2068"/>.
4923</t>
4924<t>
4925   Some clients and servers might wish to be compatible with these previous
4926   approaches to persistent connections, by explicitly negotiating for them
4927   with a "Connection: keep-alive" request header field. However, some
4928   experimental implementations of HTTP/1.0 persistent connections are faulty;
4929   for example, if a HTTP/1.0 proxy server doesn't understand
4930   <x:ref>Connection</x:ref>, it will erroneously forward that header to the
4931   next inbound server, which would result in a hung connection.
4932</t>
4933<t>
4934   One attempted solution was the introduction of a Proxy-Connection header,
4935   targeted specifically at proxies. In practice, this was also unworkable,
4936   because proxies are often deployed in multiple layers, bringing about the
4937   same problem discussed above.
4938</t>
4939<t>
4940   As a result, clients are encouraged not to send the Proxy-Connection header
4941   in any requests.
4942</t>
4943<t>
4944   Clients are also encouraged to consider the use of Connection: keep-alive
4945   in requests carefully; while they can enable persistent connections with
4946   HTTP/1.0 servers, clients using them need will need to monitor the
4947   connection for "hung" requests (which indicate that the client ought stop
4948   sending the header), and this mechanism ought not be used by clients at all
4949   when a proxy is being used.
4950</t>
4951</section>
4952
4953<section title="Introduction of Transfer-Encoding" anchor="introduction.of.transfer-encoding">
4954<t>
4955   HTTP/1.1 introduces the <x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> header field
4956   (<xref target="header.transfer-encoding"/>). Proxies/gateways &MUST; remove
4957   any transfer-coding prior to forwarding a message via a MIME-compliant
4958   protocol.
4959</t>
4960</section>
4961
4962</section>
4963
4964<section title="Changes from RFC 2616" anchor="changes.from.rfc.2616">
4965<t>
4966  Clarify that the string "HTTP" in the HTTP-version ABFN production is case
4967  sensitive. Restrict the version numbers to be single digits due to the fact
4968  that implementations are known to handle multi-digit version numbers
4969  incorrectly.
4970  (<xref target="http.version"/>)
4971</t>
4972<t>
4973  Update use of abs_path production from RFC 1808 to the path-absolute + query
4974  components of RFC 3986. State that the asterisk form is allowed for the OPTIONS
4975  request method only.
4976  (<xref target="request-target"/>)
4977</t>
4978<t>
4979  Require that invalid whitespace around field-names be rejected.
4980  (<xref target="header.fields"/>)
4981</t>
4982<t>
4983  Rules about implicit linear whitespace between certain grammar productions
4984  have been removed; now whitespace is only allowed where specifically
4985  defined in the ABNF.
4986  (<xref target="whitespace"/>)
4987</t>
4988<t> 
4989  The NUL octet is no longer allowed in comment and quoted-string
4990  text. The quoted-pair rule no longer allows escaping control characters other than HTAB.
4991  Non-ASCII content in header fields and reason phrase has been obsoleted and
4992  made opaque (the TEXT rule was removed).
4993  (<xref target="field.components"/>)
4994</t>
4995<t>
4996  Empty list elements in list productions have been deprecated.
4997  (<xref target="abnf.extension"/>)
4998</t>
4999<t>
5000  Require recipients to handle bogus <x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> header
5001  fields as errors.
5002  (<xref target="message.body"/>)
5003</t>
5004<t>
5005  Remove reference to non-existent identity transfer-coding value tokens.
5006  (Sections <xref format="counter" target="message.body"/> and
5007  <xref format="counter" target="transfer.codings"/>)
5008</t>
5009<t>
5010  Clarification that the chunk length does not include the count of the octets
5011  in the chunk header and trailer. Furthermore disallowed line folding
5012  in chunk extensions, and deprecate their use.
5013  (<xref target="chunked.encoding"/>)
5014</t>
5015<t>
5016  Registration of Transfer Codings now requires IETF Review
5017  (<xref target="transfer.coding.registry"/>)
5018</t>
5019<t>
5020  Remove hard limit of two connections per server.
5021  Remove requirement to retry a sequence of requests as long it was idempotent.
5022  Remove requirements about when servers are allowed to close connections
5023  prematurely.
5024  (<xref target="persistent.practical"/>)
5025</t>
5026<t>
5027  Remove requirement to retry requests under certain cirumstances when the
5028  server prematurely closes the connection.
5029  (<xref target="message.transmission.requirements"/>)
5030</t>
5031<t>
5032  Change ABNF productions for header fields to only define the field value.
5033</t>
5034<t>
5035  Clarify exactly when "close" connection options have to be sent.
5036  (<xref target="header.connection"/>)
5037</t>
5038<t>
5039  Define the semantics of the <x:ref>Upgrade</x:ref> header field in responses
5040  other than 101 (this was incorporated from <xref target="RFC2817"/>).
5041  (<xref target="header.upgrade"/>)
5042</t>
5043</section>
5044</section>
5045
5046<?BEGININC p1-messaging.abnf-appendix ?>
5047<section xmlns:x="http://purl.org/net/xml2rfc/ext" title="Collected ABNF" anchor="collected.abnf">
5048<figure>
5049<artwork type="abnf" name="p1-messaging.parsed-abnf">
5050<x:ref>BWS</x:ref> = OWS
5051
5052<x:ref>Connection</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) connection-option *( OWS "," [ OWS
5053 connection-option ] )
5054<x:ref>Content-Length</x:ref> = 1*DIGIT
5055
5056<x:ref>HTTP-message</x:ref> = start-line *( header-field CRLF ) CRLF [ message-body
5057 ]
5058<x:ref>HTTP-name</x:ref> = %x48.54.54.50 ; HTTP
5059<x:ref>HTTP-version</x:ref> = HTTP-name "/" DIGIT "." DIGIT
5060<x:ref>Host</x:ref> = uri-host [ ":" port ]
5061
5062<x:ref>OWS</x:ref> = *( SP / HTAB )
5063
5064<x:ref>RWS</x:ref> = 1*( SP / HTAB )
5065
5066<x:ref>TE</x:ref> = [ ( "," / t-codings ) *( OWS "," [ OWS t-codings ] ) ]
5067<x:ref>Trailer</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) field-name *( OWS "," [ OWS field-name ] )
5068<x:ref>Transfer-Encoding</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) transfer-coding *( OWS "," [ OWS
5069 transfer-coding ] )
5070
5071<x:ref>URI-reference</x:ref> = &lt;URI-reference, defined in [RFC3986], Section 4.1&gt;
5072<x:ref>Upgrade</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) protocol *( OWS "," [ OWS protocol ] )
5073
5074<x:ref>Via</x:ref> = *( "," OWS ) ( received-protocol RWS received-by [ RWS comment
5075 ] ) *( OWS "," [ OWS ( received-protocol RWS received-by [ RWS
5076 comment ] ) ] )
5077
5078<x:ref>absolute-URI</x:ref> = &lt;absolute-URI, defined in [RFC3986], Section 4.3&gt;
5079<x:ref>absolute-form</x:ref> = absolute-URI
5080<x:ref>asterisk-form</x:ref> = "*"
5081<x:ref>attribute</x:ref> = token
5082<x:ref>authority</x:ref> = &lt;authority, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.2&gt;
5083<x:ref>authority-form</x:ref> = authority
5084
5085<x:ref>chunk</x:ref> = chunk-size [ chunk-ext ] CRLF chunk-data CRLF
5086<x:ref>chunk-data</x:ref> = 1*OCTET
5087<x:ref>chunk-ext</x:ref> = *( ";" chunk-ext-name [ "=" chunk-ext-val ] )
5088<x:ref>chunk-ext-name</x:ref> = token
5089<x:ref>chunk-ext-val</x:ref> = token / quoted-str-nf
5090<x:ref>chunk-size</x:ref> = 1*HEXDIG
5091<x:ref>chunked-body</x:ref> = *chunk last-chunk trailer-part CRLF
5092<x:ref>comment</x:ref> = "(" *( ctext / quoted-cpair / comment ) ")"
5093<x:ref>connection-option</x:ref> = token
5094<x:ref>ctext</x:ref> = OWS / %x21-27 ; '!'-'''
5095 / %x2A-5B ; '*'-'['
5096 / %x5D-7E ; ']'-'~'
5097 / obs-text
5098
5099<x:ref>field-content</x:ref> = *( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
5100<x:ref>field-name</x:ref> = token
5101<x:ref>field-value</x:ref> = *( field-content / obs-fold )
5102
5103<x:ref>header-field</x:ref> = field-name ":" OWS field-value BWS
5104<x:ref>http-URI</x:ref> = "http://" authority path-abempty [ "?" query ]
5105<x:ref>https-URI</x:ref> = "https://" authority path-abempty [ "?" query ]
5106
5107<x:ref>last-chunk</x:ref> = 1*"0" [ chunk-ext ] CRLF
5108
5109<x:ref>message-body</x:ref> = *OCTET
5110<x:ref>method</x:ref> = token
5111
5112<x:ref>obs-fold</x:ref> = CRLF ( SP / HTAB )
5113<x:ref>obs-text</x:ref> = %x80-FF
5114<x:ref>origin-form</x:ref> = path-absolute [ "?" query ]
5115
5116<x:ref>partial-URI</x:ref> = relative-part [ "?" query ]
5117<x:ref>path-abempty</x:ref> = &lt;path-abempty, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.3&gt;
5118<x:ref>path-absolute</x:ref> = &lt;path-absolute, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.3&gt;
5119<x:ref>port</x:ref> = &lt;port, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.2.3&gt;
5120<x:ref>protocol</x:ref> = protocol-name [ "/" protocol-version ]
5121<x:ref>protocol-name</x:ref> = token
5122<x:ref>protocol-version</x:ref> = token
5123<x:ref>pseudonym</x:ref> = token
5124
5125<x:ref>qdtext</x:ref> = OWS / "!" / %x23-5B ; '#'-'['
5126 / %x5D-7E ; ']'-'~'
5127 / obs-text
5128<x:ref>qdtext-nf</x:ref> = HTAB / SP / "!" / %x23-5B ; '#'-'['
5129 / %x5D-7E ; ']'-'~'
5130 / obs-text
5131<x:ref>query</x:ref> = &lt;query, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.4&gt;
5132<x:ref>quoted-cpair</x:ref> = "\" ( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
5133<x:ref>quoted-pair</x:ref> = "\" ( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
5134<x:ref>quoted-str-nf</x:ref> = DQUOTE *( qdtext-nf / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE
5135<x:ref>quoted-string</x:ref> = DQUOTE *( qdtext / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE
5136<x:ref>qvalue</x:ref> = ( "0" [ "." *3DIGIT ] ) / ( "1" [ "." *3"0" ] )
5137
5138<x:ref>reason-phrase</x:ref> = *( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
5139<x:ref>received-by</x:ref> = ( uri-host [ ":" port ] ) / pseudonym
5140<x:ref>received-protocol</x:ref> = [ protocol-name "/" ] protocol-version
5141<x:ref>relative-part</x:ref> = &lt;relative-part, defined in [RFC3986], Section 4.2&gt;
5142<x:ref>request-line</x:ref> = method SP request-target SP HTTP-version CRLF
5143<x:ref>request-target</x:ref> = origin-form / absolute-form / authority-form /
5144 asterisk-form
5145
5146<x:ref>special</x:ref> = "(" / ")" / "&lt;" / "&gt;" / "@" / "," / ";" / ":" / "\" /
5147 DQUOTE / "/" / "[" / "]" / "?" / "=" / "{" / "}"
5148<x:ref>start-line</x:ref> = request-line / status-line
5149<x:ref>status-code</x:ref> = 3DIGIT
5150<x:ref>status-line</x:ref> = HTTP-version SP status-code SP reason-phrase CRLF
5151
5152<x:ref>t-codings</x:ref> = "trailers" / ( transfer-extension [ te-params ] )
5153<x:ref>tchar</x:ref> = "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&amp;" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "." /
5154 "^" / "_" / "`" / "|" / "~" / DIGIT / ALPHA
5155<x:ref>te-ext</x:ref> = OWS ";" OWS token [ "=" word ]
5156<x:ref>te-params</x:ref> = OWS ";" OWS "q=" qvalue *te-ext
5157<x:ref>token</x:ref> = 1*tchar
5158<x:ref>trailer-part</x:ref> = *( header-field CRLF )
5159<x:ref>transfer-coding</x:ref> = "chunked" / "compress" / "deflate" / "gzip" /
5160 transfer-extension
5161<x:ref>transfer-extension</x:ref> = token *( OWS ";" OWS transfer-parameter )
5162<x:ref>transfer-parameter</x:ref> = attribute BWS "=" BWS value
5163
5164<x:ref>uri-host</x:ref> = &lt;host, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.2.2&gt;
5165
5166<x:ref>value</x:ref> = word
5167
5168<x:ref>word</x:ref> = token / quoted-string
5169</artwork>
5170</figure>
5171<figure><preamble>ABNF diagnostics:</preamble><artwork type="inline">
5172; Connection defined but not used
5173; Content-Length defined but not used
5174; HTTP-message defined but not used
5175; Host defined but not used
5176; TE defined but not used
5177; Trailer defined but not used
5178; Transfer-Encoding defined but not used
5179; URI-reference defined but not used
5180; Upgrade defined but not used
5181; Via defined but not used
5182; chunked-body defined but not used
5183; http-URI defined but not used
5184; https-URI defined but not used
5185; partial-URI defined but not used
5186; special defined but not used
5187</artwork></figure></section>
5188<?ENDINC p1-messaging.abnf-appendix ?>
5189
5190<section title="Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)" anchor="change.log">
5191
5192<section title="Since RFC 2616">
5193<t>
5194  Extracted relevant partitions from <xref target="RFC2616"/>.
5195</t>
5196</section>
5197
5198<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-00">
5199<t>
5200  Closed issues:
5201  <list style="symbols"> 
5202    <t>
5203      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/1"/>:
5204      "HTTP Version should be case sensitive"
5205      (<eref target="http://purl.org/NET/http-errata#verscase"/>)
5206    </t>
5207    <t>
5208      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/2"/>:
5209      "'unsafe' characters"
5210      (<eref target="http://purl.org/NET/http-errata#unsafe-uri"/>)
5211    </t>
5212    <t>
5213      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/3"/>:
5214      "Chunk Size Definition"
5215      (<eref target="http://purl.org/NET/http-errata#chunk-size"/>)
5216    </t>
5217    <t>
5218      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/4"/>:
5219      "Message Length"
5220      (<eref target="http://purl.org/NET/http-errata#msg-len-chars"/>)
5221    </t>
5222    <t>
5223      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/8"/>:
5224      "Media Type Registrations"
5225      (<eref target="http://purl.org/NET/http-errata#media-reg"/>)
5226    </t>
5227    <t>
5228      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/11"/>:
5229      "URI includes query"
5230      (<eref target="http://purl.org/NET/http-errata#uriquery"/>)
5231    </t>
5232    <t>
5233      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/15"/>:
5234      "No close on 1xx responses"
5235      (<eref target="http://purl.org/NET/http-errata#noclose1xx"/>)
5236    </t>
5237    <t>
5238      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/16"/>:
5239      "Remove 'identity' token references"
5240      (<eref target="http://purl.org/NET/http-errata#identity"/>)
5241    </t>
5242    <t>
5243      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/26"/>:
5244      "Import query BNF"
5245    </t>
5246    <t>
5247      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/31"/>:
5248      "qdtext BNF"
5249    </t>
5250    <t>
5251      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/35"/>:
5252      "Normative and Informative references"
5253    </t>
5254    <t>
5255      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/42"/>:
5256      "RFC2606 Compliance"
5257    </t>
5258    <t>
5259      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/45"/>:
5260      "RFC977 reference"
5261    </t>
5262    <t>
5263      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/46"/>:
5264      "RFC1700 references"
5265    </t>
5266    <t>
5267      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/47"/>:
5268      "inconsistency in date format explanation"
5269    </t>
5270    <t>
5271      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/48"/>:
5272      "Date reference typo"
5273    </t>
5274    <t>
5275      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/65"/>:
5276      "Informative references"
5277    </t>
5278    <t>
5279      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/66"/>:
5280      "ISO-8859-1 Reference"
5281    </t>
5282    <t>
5283      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/86"/>:
5284      "Normative up-to-date references"
5285    </t>
5286  </list>
5287</t>
5288<t>
5289  Other changes:
5290  <list style="symbols"> 
5291    <t>
5292      Update media type registrations to use RFC4288 template.
5293    </t>
5294    <t>
5295      Use names of RFC4234 core rules DQUOTE and HTAB,
5296      fix broken ABNF for chunk-data
5297      (work in progress on <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36"/>)
5298    </t>
5299  </list>
5300</t>
5301</section>
5302
5303<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-01">
5304<t>
5305  Closed issues:
5306  <list style="symbols"> 
5307    <t>
5308      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/19"/>:
5309      "Bodies on GET (and other) requests"
5310    </t>
5311    <t>
5312      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/55"/>:
5313      "Updating to RFC4288"
5314    </t>
5315    <t>
5316      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/57"/>:
5317      "Status Code and Reason Phrase"
5318    </t>
5319    <t>
5320      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/82"/>:
5321      "rel_path not used"
5322    </t>
5323  </list>
5324</t>
5325<t>
5326  Ongoing work on ABNF conversion (<eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36"/>):
5327  <list style="symbols"> 
5328    <t>
5329      Get rid of duplicate BNF rule names ("host" -> "uri-host", "trailer" ->
5330      "trailer-part").
5331    </t>
5332    <t>
5333      Avoid underscore character in rule names ("http_URL" ->
5334      "http-URL", "abs_path" -> "path-absolute").
5335    </t>
5336    <t>
5337      Add rules for terms imported from URI spec ("absoluteURI", "authority",
5338      "path-absolute", "port", "query", "relativeURI", "host) &mdash; these will
5339      have to be updated when switching over to RFC3986.
5340    </t>
5341    <t>
5342      Synchronize core rules with RFC5234.
5343    </t>
5344    <t>
5345      Get rid of prose rules that span multiple lines.
5346    </t>
5347    <t>
5348      Get rid of unused rules LOALPHA and UPALPHA.
5349    </t>
5350    <t>
5351      Move "Product Tokens" section (back) into Part 1, as "token" is used
5352      in the definition of the Upgrade header field.
5353    </t>
5354    <t>
5355      Add explicit references to BNF syntax and rules imported from other parts of the specification.
5356    </t>
5357    <t>
5358      Rewrite prose rule "token" in terms of "tchar", rewrite prose rule "TEXT".
5359    </t>
5360  </list>
5361</t>
5362</section>
5363
5364<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-02" anchor="changes.since.02">
5365<t>
5366  Closed issues:
5367  <list style="symbols"> 
5368    <t>
5369      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/51"/>:
5370      "HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date"
5371    </t>
5372    <t>
5373      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/64"/>:
5374      "WS in quoted-pair"
5375    </t>
5376  </list>
5377</t>
5378<t>
5379  Ongoing work on IANA Message Header Field Registration (<eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/40"/>):
5380  <list style="symbols"> 
5381    <t>
5382      Reference RFC 3984, and update header field registrations for headers defined
5383      in this document.
5384    </t>
5385  </list>
5386</t>
5387<t>
5388  Ongoing work on ABNF conversion (<eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36"/>):
5389  <list style="symbols"> 
5390    <t>
5391      Replace string literals when the string really is case-sensitive (HTTP-version).
5392    </t>
5393  </list>
5394</t>
5395</section>
5396
5397<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-03" anchor="changes.since.03">
5398<t>
5399  Closed issues:
5400  <list style="symbols"> 
5401    <t>
5402      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/28"/>:
5403      "Connection closing"
5404    </t>
5405    <t>
5406      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/97"/>:
5407      "Move registrations and registry information to IANA Considerations"
5408    </t>
5409    <t>
5410      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/120"/>:
5411      "need new URL for PAD1995 reference"
5412    </t>
5413    <t>
5414      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/127"/>:
5415      "IANA Considerations: update HTTP URI scheme registration"
5416    </t>
5417    <t>
5418      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/128"/>:
5419      "Cite HTTPS URI scheme definition"
5420    </t>
5421    <t>
5422      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/129"/>:
5423      "List-type headers vs Set-Cookie"
5424    </t>
5425  </list>
5426</t>
5427<t>
5428  Ongoing work on ABNF conversion (<eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36"/>):
5429  <list style="symbols"> 
5430    <t>
5431      Replace string literals when the string really is case-sensitive (HTTP-Date).
5432    </t>
5433    <t>
5434      Replace HEX by HEXDIG for future consistence with RFC 5234's core rules.
5435    </t>
5436  </list>
5437</t>
5438</section>
5439
5440<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-04" anchor="changes.since.04">
5441<t>
5442  Closed issues:
5443  <list style="symbols"> 
5444    <t>
5445      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/34"/>:
5446      "Out-of-date reference for URIs"
5447    </t>
5448    <t>
5449      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/132"/>:
5450      "RFC 2822 is updated by RFC 5322"
5451    </t>
5452  </list>
5453</t>
5454<t>
5455  Ongoing work on ABNF conversion (<eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36"/>):
5456  <list style="symbols"> 
5457    <t>
5458      Use "/" instead of "|" for alternatives.
5459    </t>
5460    <t>
5461      Get rid of RFC822 dependency; use RFC5234 plus extensions instead.
5462    </t>
5463    <t>
5464      Only reference RFC 5234's core rules.
5465    </t>
5466    <t>
5467      Introduce new ABNF rules for "bad" whitespace ("BWS"), optional
5468      whitespace ("OWS") and required whitespace ("RWS").
5469    </t>
5470    <t>
5471      Rewrite ABNFs to spell out whitespace rules, factor out
5472      header field value format definitions.
5473    </t>
5474  </list>
5475</t>
5476</section>
5477
5478<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-05" anchor="changes.since.05">
5479<t>
5480  Closed issues:
5481  <list style="symbols"> 
5482    <t>
5483      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/30"/>:
5484      "Header LWS"
5485    </t>
5486    <t>
5487      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/52"/>:
5488      "Sort 1.3 Terminology"
5489    </t>
5490    <t>
5491      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/63"/>:
5492      "RFC2047 encoded words"
5493    </t>
5494    <t>
5495      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/74"/>:
5496      "Character Encodings in TEXT"
5497    </t>
5498    <t>
5499      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/77"/>:
5500      "Line Folding"
5501    </t>
5502    <t>
5503      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/83"/>:
5504      "OPTIONS * and proxies"
5505    </t>
5506    <t>
5507      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/94"/>:
5508      "reason-phrase BNF"
5509    </t>
5510    <t>
5511      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/111"/>:
5512      "Use of TEXT"
5513    </t>
5514    <t>
5515      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/118"/>:
5516      "Join "Differences Between HTTP Entities and RFC 2045 Entities"?"
5517    </t>
5518    <t>
5519      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/134"/>:
5520      "RFC822 reference left in discussion of date formats"
5521    </t>
5522  </list>
5523</t>
5524<t>
5525  Final work on ABNF conversion (<eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36"/>):
5526  <list style="symbols"> 
5527    <t>
5528      Rewrite definition of list rules, deprecate empty list elements.
5529    </t>
5530    <t>
5531      Add appendix containing collected and expanded ABNF.
5532    </t>
5533  </list>
5534</t>
5535<t>
5536  Other changes:
5537  <list style="symbols"> 
5538    <t>
5539      Rewrite introduction; add mostly new Architecture Section.
5540    </t>
5541    <t>
5542      Move definition of quality values from Part 3 into Part 1;
5543      make TE request header field grammar independent of accept-params (defined in Part 3).
5544    </t>
5545  </list>
5546</t>
5547</section>
5548
5549<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-06" anchor="changes.since.06">
5550<t>
5551  Closed issues:
5552  <list style="symbols"> 
5553    <t>
5554      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/161"/>:
5555      "base for numeric protocol elements"
5556    </t>
5557    <t>
5558      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/162"/>:
5559      "comment ABNF"
5560    </t>
5561  </list>
5562</t>
5563<t>
5564  Partly resolved issues:
5565  <list style="symbols"> 
5566    <t>
5567      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/88"/>:
5568      "205 Bodies" (took out language that implied that there might be
5569      methods for which a request body MUST NOT be included)
5570    </t>
5571    <t>
5572      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/163"/>:
5573      "editorial improvements around HTTP-date"
5574    </t>
5575  </list>
5576</t>
5577</section>
5578
5579<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-07" anchor="changes.since.07">
5580<t>
5581  Closed issues:
5582  <list style="symbols"> 
5583    <t>
5584      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/93"/>:
5585      "Repeating single-value headers"
5586    </t>
5587    <t>
5588      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/131"/>:
5589      "increase connection limit"
5590    </t>
5591    <t>
5592      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/157"/>:
5593      "IP addresses in URLs"
5594    </t>
5595    <t>
5596      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/172"/>:
5597      "take over HTTP Upgrade Token Registry"
5598    </t>
5599    <t>
5600      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/173"/>:
5601      "CR and LF in chunk extension values"
5602    </t>
5603    <t>
5604      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/184"/>:
5605      "HTTP/0.9 support"
5606    </t>
5607    <t>
5608      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/188"/>:
5609      "pick IANA policy (RFC5226) for Transfer Coding / Content Coding"
5610    </t>
5611    <t>
5612      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/189"/>:
5613      "move definitions of gzip/deflate/compress to part 1"
5614    </t>
5615    <t>
5616      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/194"/>:
5617      "disallow control characters in quoted-pair"
5618    </t>
5619  </list>
5620</t>
5621<t>
5622  Partly resolved issues:
5623  <list style="symbols"> 
5624    <t>
5625      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/148"/>:
5626      "update IANA requirements wrt Transfer-Coding values" (add the
5627      IANA Considerations subsection)
5628    </t>
5629  </list>
5630</t>
5631</section>
5632
5633<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-08" anchor="changes.since.08">
5634<t>
5635  Closed issues:
5636  <list style="symbols"> 
5637    <t>
5638      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/201"/>:
5639      "header parsing, treatment of leading and trailing OWS"
5640    </t>
5641  </list>
5642</t>
5643<t>
5644  Partly resolved issues:
5645  <list style="symbols"> 
5646    <t>
5647      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/60"/>:
5648      "Placement of 13.5.1 and 13.5.2"
5649    </t>
5650    <t>
5651      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/200"/>:
5652      "use of term "word" when talking about header structure"
5653    </t>
5654  </list>
5655</t>
5656</section>
5657
5658<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-09" anchor="changes.since.09">
5659<t>
5660  Closed issues:
5661  <list style="symbols"> 
5662    <t>
5663      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/73"/>:
5664      "Clarification of the term 'deflate'"
5665    </t>
5666    <t>
5667      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/83"/>:
5668      "OPTIONS * and proxies"
5669    </t>
5670    <t>
5671      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/122"/>:
5672      "MIME-Version not listed in P1, general header fields"
5673    </t>
5674    <t>
5675      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/143"/>:
5676      "IANA registry for content/transfer encodings"
5677    </t>
5678    <t>
5679      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/165"/>:
5680      "Case-sensitivity of HTTP-date"
5681    </t>
5682    <t>
5683      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/200"/>:
5684      "use of term "word" when talking about header structure"
5685    </t>
5686  </list>
5687</t>
5688<t>
5689  Partly resolved issues:
5690  <list style="symbols"> 
5691    <t>
5692      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/196"/>:
5693      "Term for the requested resource's URI"
5694    </t>
5695  </list>
5696</t>
5697</section>
5698
5699<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-10" anchor="changes.since.10">
5700<t>
5701  Closed issues:
5702  <list style="symbols">
5703    <t>
5704      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/28"/>:
5705      "Connection Closing"
5706    </t>
5707    <t>
5708      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/90"/>:
5709      "Delimiting messages with multipart/byteranges"
5710    </t>
5711    <t>
5712      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/95"/>:
5713      "Handling multiple Content-Length headers"
5714    </t>
5715    <t>
5716      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/109"/>:
5717      "Clarify entity / representation / variant terminology"
5718    </t>
5719    <t>
5720      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/220"/>:
5721      "consider removing the 'changes from 2068' sections"
5722    </t>
5723  </list>
5724</t>
5725<t>
5726  Partly resolved issues:
5727  <list style="symbols"> 
5728    <t>
5729      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/159"/>:
5730      "HTTP(s) URI scheme definitions"
5731    </t>
5732  </list>
5733</t>
5734</section>
5735
5736<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-11" anchor="changes.since.11">
5737<t>
5738  Closed issues:
5739  <list style="symbols">
5740    <t>
5741      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/193"/>:
5742      "Trailer requirements"
5743    </t>
5744    <t>
5745      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/204"/>:
5746      "Text about clock requirement for caches belongs in p6"
5747    </t>
5748    <t>
5749      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/221"/>:
5750      "effective request URI: handling of missing host in HTTP/1.0"
5751    </t>
5752    <t>
5753      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/248"/>:
5754      "confusing Date requirements for clients"
5755    </t>
5756  </list>
5757</t>
5758<t>
5759  Partly resolved issues:
5760  <list style="symbols"> 
5761    <t>
5762      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/95"/>:
5763      "Handling multiple Content-Length headers"
5764    </t>
5765  </list>
5766</t>
5767</section>
5768
5769<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-12" anchor="changes.since.12">
5770<t>
5771  Closed issues:
5772  <list style="symbols">
5773    <t>
5774      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/75"/>:
5775      "RFC2145 Normative"
5776    </t>
5777    <t>
5778      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/159"/>:
5779      "HTTP(s) URI scheme definitions" (tune the requirements on userinfo)
5780    </t>
5781    <t>
5782      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/210"/>:
5783      "define 'transparent' proxy"
5784    </t>
5785    <t>
5786      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/224"/>:
5787      "Header Classification"
5788    </t>
5789    <t>
5790      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/233"/>:
5791      "Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?"
5792    </t>
5793    <t>
5794      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/240"/>:
5795      "Migrate Upgrade details from RFC2817"
5796    </t>
5797    <t>
5798      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/276"/>:
5799      "untangle ABNFs for header fields"
5800    </t>
5801    <t>
5802      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/279"/>:
5803      "update RFC 2109 reference"
5804    </t>
5805  </list>
5806</t>
5807</section>
5808
5809<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-13" anchor="changes.since.13">
5810<t>
5811  Closed issues:
5812  <list style="symbols">
5813    <t>
5814      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/53"/>:
5815      "Allow is not in 13.5.2"
5816    </t>
5817    <t>
5818      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/95"/>:
5819      "Handling multiple Content-Length headers"
5820    </t>
5821    <t>
5822      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/276"/>:
5823      "untangle ABNFs for header fields"
5824    </t>
5825    <t>
5826      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/286"/>:
5827      "Content-Length ABNF broken"
5828    </t>
5829  </list>
5830</t>
5831</section>
5832
5833<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-14" anchor="changes.since.14">
5834<t>
5835  Closed issues:
5836  <list style="symbols">
5837    <t>
5838      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/273"/>:
5839      "HTTP-version should be redefined as fixed length pair of DIGIT . DIGIT"
5840    </t>
5841    <t>
5842      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/282"/>:
5843      "Recommend minimum sizes for protocol elements"
5844    </t>
5845    <t>
5846      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/283"/>:
5847      "Set expectations around buffering"
5848    </t>
5849    <t>
5850      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/288"/>:
5851      "Considering messages in isolation"
5852    </t>
5853  </list>
5854</t>
5855</section>
5856
5857<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-15" anchor="changes.since.15">
5858<t>
5859  Closed issues:
5860  <list style="symbols">
5861    <t>
5862      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/100"/>:
5863      "DNS Spoofing / DNS Binding advice"
5864    </t>
5865    <t>
5866      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/254"/>:
5867      "move RFCs 2145, 2616, 2817 to Historic status"
5868    </t>
5869    <t>
5870      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/270"/>:
5871      "\-escaping in quoted strings"
5872    </t>
5873    <t>
5874      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/305"/>:
5875      "'Close' should be reserved in the HTTP header field registry"
5876    </t>
5877  </list>
5878</t>
5879</section>
5880
5881<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-16" anchor="changes.since.16">
5882<t>
5883  Closed issues:
5884  <list style="symbols">
5885    <t>
5886      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/186"/>:
5887      "Document HTTP's error-handling philosophy"
5888    </t>
5889    <t>
5890      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/215"/>:
5891      "Explain header registration"
5892    </t>
5893    <t>
5894      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/219"/>:
5895      "Revise Acknowledgements Sections"
5896    </t>
5897    <t>
5898      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/297"/>:
5899      "Retrying Requests"
5900    </t>
5901    <t>
5902      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/318"/>:
5903      "Closing the connection on server error"
5904    </t>
5905  </list>
5906</t>
5907</section>
5908
5909<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-17" anchor="changes.since.17">
5910<t>
5911  Closed issues:
5912  <list style="symbols">
5913    <t>
5914      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/158"/>:
5915      "Proxy-Connection and Keep-Alive"
5916    </t>
5917    <t>
5918      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/166"/>:
5919      "Clarify 'User Agent'"
5920    </t>
5921    <t>
5922      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/300"/>:
5923      "Define non-final responses"
5924    </t>
5925    <t>
5926      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/323"/>:
5927      "intended maturity level vs normative references"
5928    </t>
5929    <t>
5930      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/324"/>:
5931      "Intermediary rewriting of queries"
5932    </t>
5933  </list>
5934</t>
5935</section>
5936
5937<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-18" anchor="changes.since.18">
5938<t>
5939  Closed issues:
5940  <list style="symbols">
5941    <t>
5942      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/250"/>:
5943      "message-body in CONNECT response"
5944    </t>
5945    <t>
5946      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/302"/>:
5947      "Misplaced text on connection handling in p2"
5948    </t>
5949    <t>
5950      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/335"/>:
5951      "wording of line folding rule"
5952    </t>
5953    <t>
5954      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/343"/>:
5955      "chunk-extensions"
5956    </t>
5957    <t>
5958      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/346"/>:
5959      "make IANA policy definitions consistent"
5960    </t>
5961  </list>
5962</t>
5963</section>
5964
5965<section title="Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-19" anchor="changes.since.19">
5966<t>
5967  Closed issues:
5968  <list style="symbols">
5969    <t>
5970      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/346"/>:
5971      "make IANA policy definitions consistent"
5972    </t>
5973    <t>
5974      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/359"/>:
5975      "clarify connection header field values are case-insensitive"
5976    </t>
5977    <t>
5978      <eref target="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/361"/>:
5979      "ABNF requirements for recipients"
5980    </t>
5981  </list>
5982</t>
5983</section>
5984
5985</section>
5986
5987</back>
5988</rfc>
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.