| [52] | 1 | <!DOCTYPE html |
|---|
| 2 | PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"> |
|---|
| 3 | <html lang="en"> |
|---|
| [2726] | 4 | <head profile="http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/08/04/dc-html/"> |
|---|
| [52] | 5 | <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> |
|---|
| 6 | <title>HTTP/1.1, part 4: Conditional Requests</title><style type="text/css" title="Xml2Rfc (sans serif)"> |
|---|
| 7 | a { |
|---|
| 8 | text-decoration: none; |
|---|
| 9 | } |
|---|
| 10 | a.smpl { |
|---|
| 11 | color: black; |
|---|
| 12 | } |
|---|
| 13 | a:hover { |
|---|
| 14 | text-decoration: underline; |
|---|
| 15 | } |
|---|
| 16 | a:active { |
|---|
| 17 | text-decoration: underline; |
|---|
| 18 | } |
|---|
| 19 | address { |
|---|
| 20 | margin-top: 1em; |
|---|
| 21 | margin-left: 2em; |
|---|
| 22 | font-style: normal; |
|---|
| 23 | } |
|---|
| 24 | body { |
|---|
| 25 | color: black; |
|---|
| [2726] | 26 | font-family: cambria, helvetica, arial, sans-serif; |
|---|
| 27 | font-size: 11pt; |
|---|
| 28 | margin-right: 2em; |
|---|
| [52] | 29 | } |
|---|
| 30 | cite { |
|---|
| 31 | font-style: normal; |
|---|
| 32 | } |
|---|
| 33 | dl { |
|---|
| 34 | margin-left: 2em; |
|---|
| 35 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 36 | ul.empty { |
|---|
| 37 | list-style-type: none; |
|---|
| 38 | } |
|---|
| 39 | ul.empty li { |
|---|
| [52] | 40 | margin-top: .5em; |
|---|
| 41 | } |
|---|
| 42 | dl p { |
|---|
| 43 | margin-left: 0em; |
|---|
| 44 | } |
|---|
| 45 | dt { |
|---|
| 46 | margin-top: .5em; |
|---|
| 47 | } |
|---|
| 48 | h1 { |
|---|
| [2726] | 49 | font-size: 130%; |
|---|
| [52] | 50 | line-height: 21pt; |
|---|
| 51 | page-break-after: avoid; |
|---|
| 52 | } |
|---|
| 53 | h1.np { |
|---|
| 54 | page-break-before: always; |
|---|
| 55 | } |
|---|
| 56 | h2 { |
|---|
| [2726] | 57 | font-size: 120%; |
|---|
| [52] | 58 | line-height: 15pt; |
|---|
| 59 | page-break-after: avoid; |
|---|
| 60 | } |
|---|
| [2726] | 61 | h3 { |
|---|
| 62 | font-size: 110%; |
|---|
| [52] | 63 | page-break-after: avoid; |
|---|
| 64 | } |
|---|
| [2726] | 65 | h4, h5, h6 { |
|---|
| 66 | page-break-after: avoid; |
|---|
| 67 | } |
|---|
| 68 | h1 a, h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a, h6 a { |
|---|
| [52] | 69 | color: black; |
|---|
| 70 | } |
|---|
| 71 | img { |
|---|
| 72 | margin-left: 3em; |
|---|
| 73 | } |
|---|
| 74 | li { |
|---|
| 75 | margin-left: 2em; |
|---|
| 76 | } |
|---|
| 77 | ol { |
|---|
| 78 | margin-left: 2em; |
|---|
| 79 | } |
|---|
| [2726] | 80 | ol.la { |
|---|
| 81 | list-style-type: lower-alpha; |
|---|
| 82 | } |
|---|
| 83 | ol.ua { |
|---|
| 84 | list-style-type: upper-alpha; |
|---|
| 85 | } |
|---|
| [52] | 86 | ol p { |
|---|
| 87 | margin-left: 0em; |
|---|
| 88 | } |
|---|
| 89 | p { |
|---|
| 90 | margin-left: 2em; |
|---|
| 91 | } |
|---|
| 92 | pre { |
|---|
| 93 | margin-left: 3em; |
|---|
| 94 | background-color: lightyellow; |
|---|
| 95 | padding: .25em; |
|---|
| [2726] | 96 | page-break-inside: avoid; |
|---|
| [52] | 97 | } |
|---|
| 98 | pre.text2 { |
|---|
| 99 | border-style: dotted; |
|---|
| 100 | border-width: 1px; |
|---|
| 101 | background-color: #f0f0f0; |
|---|
| 102 | width: 69em; |
|---|
| 103 | } |
|---|
| 104 | pre.inline { |
|---|
| 105 | background-color: white; |
|---|
| 106 | padding: 0em; |
|---|
| 107 | } |
|---|
| 108 | pre.text { |
|---|
| 109 | border-style: dotted; |
|---|
| 110 | border-width: 1px; |
|---|
| 111 | background-color: #f8f8f8; |
|---|
| 112 | width: 69em; |
|---|
| 113 | } |
|---|
| 114 | pre.drawing { |
|---|
| 115 | border-style: solid; |
|---|
| 116 | border-width: 1px; |
|---|
| 117 | background-color: #f8f8f8; |
|---|
| 118 | padding: 2em; |
|---|
| 119 | } |
|---|
| 120 | table { |
|---|
| 121 | margin-left: 2em; |
|---|
| 122 | } |
|---|
| 123 | table.header { |
|---|
| [1099] | 124 | border-spacing: 1px; |
|---|
| [52] | 125 | width: 95%; |
|---|
| [2726] | 126 | font-size: 11pt; |
|---|
| [52] | 127 | color: white; |
|---|
| 128 | } |
|---|
| 129 | td.top { |
|---|
| 130 | vertical-align: top; |
|---|
| 131 | } |
|---|
| 132 | td.topnowrap { |
|---|
| 133 | vertical-align: top; |
|---|
| [2726] | 134 | white-space: nowrap; |
|---|
| [52] | 135 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 136 | table.header td { |
|---|
| [52] | 137 | background-color: gray; |
|---|
| 138 | width: 50%; |
|---|
| 139 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 140 | table.header a { |
|---|
| [227] | 141 | color: white; |
|---|
| 142 | } |
|---|
| [52] | 143 | td.reference { |
|---|
| 144 | vertical-align: top; |
|---|
| 145 | white-space: nowrap; |
|---|
| 146 | padding-right: 1em; |
|---|
| 147 | } |
|---|
| 148 | thead { |
|---|
| 149 | display:table-header-group; |
|---|
| 150 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 151 | ul.toc, ul.toc ul { |
|---|
| [52] | 152 | list-style: none; |
|---|
| 153 | margin-left: 1.5em; |
|---|
| 154 | padding-left: 0em; |
|---|
| 155 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 156 | ul.toc li { |
|---|
| [52] | 157 | line-height: 150%; |
|---|
| 158 | font-weight: bold; |
|---|
| 159 | margin-left: 0em; |
|---|
| 160 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 161 | ul.toc li li { |
|---|
| [52] | 162 | line-height: normal; |
|---|
| 163 | font-weight: normal; |
|---|
| [2726] | 164 | font-size: 10pt; |
|---|
| [52] | 165 | margin-left: 0em; |
|---|
| 166 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 167 | li.excluded { |
|---|
| [52] | 168 | font-size: 0pt; |
|---|
| 169 | } |
|---|
| 170 | ul p { |
|---|
| 171 | margin-left: 0em; |
|---|
| 172 | } |
|---|
| [2726] | 173 | .title, .filename, h1, h2, h3, h4 { |
|---|
| 174 | font-family: candara, helvetica, arial, sans-serif; |
|---|
| 175 | } |
|---|
| 176 | samp, tt, code, pre { |
|---|
| 177 | font: consolas, monospace; |
|---|
| 178 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 179 | ul.ind, ul.ind ul { |
|---|
| [52] | 180 | list-style: none; |
|---|
| 181 | margin-left: 1.5em; |
|---|
| 182 | padding-left: 0em; |
|---|
| [1099] | 183 | page-break-before: avoid; |
|---|
| [52] | 184 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 185 | ul.ind li { |
|---|
| [52] | 186 | font-weight: bold; |
|---|
| 187 | line-height: 200%; |
|---|
| 188 | margin-left: 0em; |
|---|
| 189 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 190 | ul.ind li li { |
|---|
| [52] | 191 | font-weight: normal; |
|---|
| 192 | line-height: 150%; |
|---|
| 193 | margin-left: 0em; |
|---|
| 194 | } |
|---|
| [1099] | 195 | .avoidbreak { |
|---|
| 196 | page-break-inside: avoid; |
|---|
| 197 | } |
|---|
| [52] | 198 | .bcp14 { |
|---|
| 199 | font-style: normal; |
|---|
| 200 | text-transform: lowercase; |
|---|
| 201 | font-variant: small-caps; |
|---|
| 202 | } |
|---|
| 203 | .comment { |
|---|
| 204 | background-color: yellow; |
|---|
| 205 | } |
|---|
| 206 | .center { |
|---|
| 207 | text-align: center; |
|---|
| 208 | } |
|---|
| 209 | .error { |
|---|
| 210 | color: red; |
|---|
| 211 | font-style: italic; |
|---|
| 212 | font-weight: bold; |
|---|
| 213 | } |
|---|
| 214 | .figure { |
|---|
| 215 | font-weight: bold; |
|---|
| 216 | text-align: center; |
|---|
| [2726] | 217 | font-size: 10pt; |
|---|
| [52] | 218 | } |
|---|
| 219 | .filename { |
|---|
| 220 | color: #333333; |
|---|
| [2726] | 221 | font-size: 75%; |
|---|
| [52] | 222 | font-weight: bold; |
|---|
| 223 | line-height: 21pt; |
|---|
| 224 | text-align: center; |
|---|
| 225 | } |
|---|
| 226 | .fn { |
|---|
| 227 | font-weight: bold; |
|---|
| 228 | } |
|---|
| 229 | .left { |
|---|
| 230 | text-align: left; |
|---|
| 231 | } |
|---|
| 232 | .right { |
|---|
| 233 | text-align: right; |
|---|
| 234 | } |
|---|
| 235 | .title { |
|---|
| [2726] | 236 | color: green; |
|---|
| 237 | font-size: 150%; |
|---|
| [52] | 238 | line-height: 18pt; |
|---|
| 239 | font-weight: bold; |
|---|
| 240 | text-align: center; |
|---|
| 241 | margin-top: 36pt; |
|---|
| 242 | } |
|---|
| 243 | .warning { |
|---|
| [2726] | 244 | font-size: 130%; |
|---|
| [52] | 245 | background-color: yellow; |
|---|
| 246 | } |
|---|
| 247 | |
|---|
| 248 | |
|---|
| 249 | @media print { |
|---|
| 250 | .noprint { |
|---|
| 251 | display: none; |
|---|
| 252 | } |
|---|
| [2726] | 253 | |
|---|
| [52] | 254 | a { |
|---|
| 255 | color: black; |
|---|
| 256 | text-decoration: none; |
|---|
| 257 | } |
|---|
| 258 | |
|---|
| 259 | table.header { |
|---|
| 260 | width: 90%; |
|---|
| 261 | } |
|---|
| 262 | |
|---|
| 263 | td.header { |
|---|
| 264 | width: 50%; |
|---|
| 265 | color: black; |
|---|
| 266 | background-color: white; |
|---|
| 267 | vertical-align: top; |
|---|
| [2726] | 268 | font-size: 110%; |
|---|
| [52] | 269 | } |
|---|
| 270 | |
|---|
| [2726] | 271 | ul.toc a:nth-child(2)::after { |
|---|
| [52] | 272 | content: leader('.') target-counter(attr(href), page); |
|---|
| 273 | } |
|---|
| [2726] | 274 | |
|---|
| [1099] | 275 | ul.ind li li a { |
|---|
| [52] | 276 | content: target-counter(attr(href), page); |
|---|
| 277 | } |
|---|
| [2726] | 278 | |
|---|
| [52] | 279 | .print2col { |
|---|
| 280 | column-count: 2; |
|---|
| 281 | -moz-column-count: 2; |
|---|
| 282 | column-fill: auto; |
|---|
| 283 | } |
|---|
| 284 | } |
|---|
| 285 | |
|---|
| 286 | @page { |
|---|
| 287 | @top-left { |
|---|
| [2726] | 288 | content: "Internet-Draft"; |
|---|
| 289 | } |
|---|
| [52] | 290 | @top-right { |
|---|
| [2726] | 291 | content: "January 2008"; |
|---|
| 292 | } |
|---|
| [52] | 293 | @top-center { |
|---|
| [2726] | 294 | content: "HTTP/1.1, Part 4"; |
|---|
| 295 | } |
|---|
| [52] | 296 | @bottom-left { |
|---|
| [2726] | 297 | content: "Fielding, et al."; |
|---|
| 298 | } |
|---|
| [52] | 299 | @bottom-center { |
|---|
| [2726] | 300 | content: "Expires July 15, 2008"; |
|---|
| 301 | } |
|---|
| [52] | 302 | @bottom-right { |
|---|
| [2726] | 303 | content: "[Page " counter(page) "]"; |
|---|
| 304 | } |
|---|
| [52] | 305 | } |
|---|
| 306 | |
|---|
| [2726] | 307 | @page:first { |
|---|
| [52] | 308 | @top-left { |
|---|
| 309 | content: normal; |
|---|
| 310 | } |
|---|
| 311 | @top-right { |
|---|
| 312 | content: normal; |
|---|
| 313 | } |
|---|
| 314 | @top-center { |
|---|
| 315 | content: normal; |
|---|
| 316 | } |
|---|
| 317 | } |
|---|
| 318 | </style><link rel="Contents" href="#rfc.toc"> |
|---|
| 319 | <link rel="Author" href="#rfc.authors"> |
|---|
| 320 | <link rel="Copyright" href="#rfc.copyright"> |
|---|
| 321 | <link rel="Index" href="#rfc.index"> |
|---|
| 322 | <link rel="Chapter" title="1 Introduction" href="#rfc.section.1"> |
|---|
| 323 | <link rel="Chapter" title="2 Entity Tags" href="#rfc.section.2"> |
|---|
| 324 | <link rel="Chapter" title="3 Status Code Definitions" href="#rfc.section.3"> |
|---|
| 325 | <link rel="Chapter" title="4 Weak and Strong Validators" href="#rfc.section.4"> |
|---|
| 326 | <link rel="Chapter" title="5 Rules for When to Use Entity Tags and Last-Modified Dates" href="#rfc.section.5"> |
|---|
| 327 | <link rel="Chapter" title="6 Header Field Definitions" href="#rfc.section.6"> |
|---|
| 328 | <link rel="Chapter" title="7 IANA Considerations" href="#rfc.section.7"> |
|---|
| 329 | <link rel="Chapter" title="8 Security Considerations" href="#rfc.section.8"> |
|---|
| 330 | <link rel="Chapter" title="9 Acknowledgments" href="#rfc.section.9"> |
|---|
| 331 | <link rel="Chapter" href="#rfc.section.10" title="10 References"> |
|---|
| [99] | 332 | <link rel="Appendix" title="A Compatibility with Previous Versions" href="#rfc.section.A"> |
|---|
| [115] | 333 | <link rel="Appendix" title="B Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)" href="#rfc.section.B"> |
|---|
| [2726] | 334 | <meta name="generator" content="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629.xslt, Revision 1.640, 2014/06/13 12:42:58, XSLT vendor: SAXON 8.9 from Saxonica http://www.saxonica.com/"> |
|---|
| [1099] | 335 | <link rel="schema.dct" href="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"> |
|---|
| 336 | <meta name="dct.creator" content="Fielding, R."> |
|---|
| 337 | <meta name="dct.creator" content="Gettys, J."> |
|---|
| 338 | <meta name="dct.creator" content="Mogul, J."> |
|---|
| 339 | <meta name="dct.creator" content="Frystyk, H."> |
|---|
| 340 | <meta name="dct.creator" content="Masinter, L."> |
|---|
| 341 | <meta name="dct.creator" content="Leach, P."> |
|---|
| 342 | <meta name="dct.creator" content="Berners-Lee, T."> |
|---|
| 343 | <meta name="dct.creator" content="Lafon, Y."> |
|---|
| 344 | <meta name="dct.creator" content="Reschke, J. F."> |
|---|
| 345 | <meta name="dct.identifier" content="urn:ietf:id:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-01"> |
|---|
| 346 | <meta name="dct.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2008-01-12"> |
|---|
| 347 | <meta name="dct.replaces" content="urn:ietf:rfc:2616"> |
|---|
| 348 | <meta name="dct.abstract" content="The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information systems. HTTP has been in use by the World Wide Web global information initiative since 1990. This document is Part 4 of the seven-part specification that defines the protocol referred to as "HTTP/1.1" and, taken together, obsoletes RFC 2616. Part 4 defines request header fields for indicating conditional requests and the rules for constructing responses to those requests."> |
|---|
| 349 | <meta name="description" content="The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information systems. HTTP has been in use by the World Wide Web global information initiative since 1990. This document is Part 4 of the seven-part specification that defines the protocol referred to as "HTTP/1.1" and, taken together, obsoletes RFC 2616. Part 4 defines request header fields for indicating conditional requests and the rules for constructing responses to those requests."> |
|---|
| [52] | 350 | </head> |
|---|
| 351 | <body> |
|---|
| [1099] | 352 | <table class="header"> |
|---|
| 353 | <tbody> |
|---|
| 354 | <tr> |
|---|
| 355 | <td class="left">Network Working Group</td> |
|---|
| 356 | <td class="right">R. Fielding, Editor</td> |
|---|
| 357 | </tr> |
|---|
| 358 | <tr> |
|---|
| 359 | <td class="left">Internet-Draft</td> |
|---|
| 360 | <td class="right">Day Software</td> |
|---|
| 361 | </tr> |
|---|
| 362 | <tr> |
|---|
| [2726] | 363 | <td class="left">Obsoletes: <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616">2616</a> (if approved) |
|---|
| [1099] | 364 | </td> |
|---|
| 365 | <td class="right">J. Gettys</td> |
|---|
| 366 | </tr> |
|---|
| 367 | <tr> |
|---|
| 368 | <td class="left">Intended status: Standards Track</td> |
|---|
| 369 | <td class="right">One Laptop per Child</td> |
|---|
| 370 | </tr> |
|---|
| 371 | <tr> |
|---|
| 372 | <td class="left">Expires: July 15, 2008</td> |
|---|
| 373 | <td class="right">J. Mogul</td> |
|---|
| 374 | </tr> |
|---|
| 375 | <tr> |
|---|
| 376 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 377 | <td class="right">HP</td> |
|---|
| 378 | </tr> |
|---|
| 379 | <tr> |
|---|
| 380 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 381 | <td class="right">H. Frystyk</td> |
|---|
| 382 | </tr> |
|---|
| 383 | <tr> |
|---|
| 384 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 385 | <td class="right">Microsoft</td> |
|---|
| 386 | </tr> |
|---|
| 387 | <tr> |
|---|
| 388 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 389 | <td class="right">L. Masinter</td> |
|---|
| 390 | </tr> |
|---|
| 391 | <tr> |
|---|
| 392 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 393 | <td class="right">Adobe Systems</td> |
|---|
| 394 | </tr> |
|---|
| 395 | <tr> |
|---|
| 396 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 397 | <td class="right">P. Leach</td> |
|---|
| 398 | </tr> |
|---|
| 399 | <tr> |
|---|
| 400 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 401 | <td class="right">Microsoft</td> |
|---|
| 402 | </tr> |
|---|
| 403 | <tr> |
|---|
| 404 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 405 | <td class="right">T. Berners-Lee</td> |
|---|
| 406 | </tr> |
|---|
| 407 | <tr> |
|---|
| 408 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 409 | <td class="right">W3C/MIT</td> |
|---|
| 410 | </tr> |
|---|
| 411 | <tr> |
|---|
| 412 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 413 | <td class="right">Y. Lafon, Editor</td> |
|---|
| 414 | </tr> |
|---|
| 415 | <tr> |
|---|
| 416 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 417 | <td class="right">W3C</td> |
|---|
| 418 | </tr> |
|---|
| 419 | <tr> |
|---|
| 420 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 421 | <td class="right">J. Reschke, Editor</td> |
|---|
| 422 | </tr> |
|---|
| 423 | <tr> |
|---|
| 424 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 425 | <td class="right">greenbytes</td> |
|---|
| 426 | </tr> |
|---|
| 427 | <tr> |
|---|
| 428 | <td class="left"></td> |
|---|
| 429 | <td class="right">January 12, 2008</td> |
|---|
| 430 | </tr> |
|---|
| 431 | </tbody> |
|---|
| [52] | 432 | </table> |
|---|
| [165] | 433 | <p class="title">HTTP/1.1, part 4: Conditional Requests<br><span class="filename">draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-01</span></p> |
|---|
| [2726] | 434 | <div id="rfc.status"> |
|---|
| 435 | <h1><a href="#rfc.status">Status of this Memo</a></h1> |
|---|
| 436 | <p>By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she |
|---|
| 437 | is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section |
|---|
| 438 | 6 of BCP 79. |
|---|
| 439 | </p> |
|---|
| 440 | <p>Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note |
|---|
| 441 | that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. |
|---|
| 442 | </p> |
|---|
| 443 | <p>Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other |
|---|
| 444 | documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work |
|---|
| 445 | in progress”. |
|---|
| 446 | </p> |
|---|
| 447 | <p>The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at <a href="http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt">http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt</a>. |
|---|
| 448 | </p> |
|---|
| 449 | <p>The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at <a href="http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html">http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html</a>. |
|---|
| 450 | </p> |
|---|
| 451 | <p>This Internet-Draft will expire on July 15, 2008.</p> |
|---|
| 452 | </div> |
|---|
| 453 | <h1 id="rfc.abstract"><a href="#rfc.abstract">Abstract</a></h1> |
|---|
| [52] | 454 | <p>The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information |
|---|
| 455 | systems. HTTP has been in use by the World Wide Web global information initiative since 1990. This document is Part 4 of the |
|---|
| 456 | seven-part specification that defines the protocol referred to as "HTTP/1.1" and, taken together, obsoletes RFC 2616. Part |
|---|
| 457 | 4 defines request header fields for indicating conditional requests and the rules for constructing responses to those requests. |
|---|
| [2726] | 458 | </p> |
|---|
| 459 | <h1 id="rfc.note.1"><a href="#rfc.note.1">Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)</a></h1> |
|---|
| [52] | 460 | <p>Discussion of this draft should take place on the HTTPBIS working group mailing list (ietf-http-wg@w3.org). The current issues |
|---|
| [113] | 461 | list is at <<a href="http://www.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/11">http://www.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/11</a>> and related documents (including fancy diffs) can be found at <<a href="http://www.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/">http://www.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/</a>>. |
|---|
| [2726] | 462 | </p> |
|---|
| [153] | 463 | <p>This draft incorporates those issue resolutions that were either collected in the original RFC2616 errata list (<<a href="http://purl.org/NET/http-errata">http://purl.org/NET/http-errata</a>>), or which were agreed upon on the mailing list between October 2006 and November 2007 (as published in "draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-03"). |
|---|
| [2726] | 464 | </p> |
|---|
| [52] | 465 | <hr class="noprint"> |
|---|
| 466 | <h1 class="np" id="rfc.toc"><a href="#rfc.toc">Table of Contents</a></h1> |
|---|
| 467 | <ul class="toc"> |
|---|
| [2726] | 468 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.1">1.</a> <a href="#introduction">Introduction</a><ul> |
|---|
| 469 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a> <a href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></li> |
|---|
| [96] | 470 | </ul> |
|---|
| 471 | </li> |
|---|
| [2726] | 472 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a> <a href="#entity.tags">Entity Tags</a></li> |
|---|
| 473 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.3">3.</a> <a href="#rfc.section.3">Status Code Definitions</a><ul> |
|---|
| 474 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.1">3.1</a> <a href="#status.304">304 Not Modified</a></li> |
|---|
| 475 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.3.2">3.2</a> <a href="#status.412">412 Precondition Failed</a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 476 | </ul> |
|---|
| 477 | </li> |
|---|
| [2726] | 478 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.4">4.</a> <a href="#weak.and.strong.validators">Weak and Strong Validators</a></li> |
|---|
| 479 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.5">5.</a> <a href="#rules.for.when.to.use.entity.tags.and.last-modified.dates">Rules for When to Use Entity Tags and Last-Modified Dates</a></li> |
|---|
| 480 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.6">6.</a> <a href="#header.fields">Header Field Definitions</a><ul> |
|---|
| 481 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.1">6.1</a> <a href="#header.etag">ETag</a></li> |
|---|
| 482 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.2">6.2</a> <a href="#header.if-match">If-Match</a></li> |
|---|
| 483 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.3">6.3</a> <a href="#header.if-modified-since">If-Modified-Since</a></li> |
|---|
| 484 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.4">6.4</a> <a href="#header.if-none-match">If-None-Match</a></li> |
|---|
| 485 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.5">6.5</a> <a href="#header.if-unmodified-since">If-Unmodified-Since</a></li> |
|---|
| 486 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.6.6">6.6</a> <a href="#header.last-modified">Last-Modified</a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 487 | </ul> |
|---|
| 488 | </li> |
|---|
| [2726] | 489 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.7">7.</a> <a href="#IANA.considerations">IANA Considerations</a></li> |
|---|
| 490 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.8">8.</a> <a href="#security.considerations">Security Considerations</a></li> |
|---|
| 491 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.9">9.</a> <a href="#ack">Acknowledgments</a></li> |
|---|
| 492 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.10">10.</a> <a href="#rfc.references">References</a><ul> |
|---|
| 493 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.10.1">10.1</a> <a href="#rfc.references.1">Normative References</a></li> |
|---|
| 494 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.10.2">10.2</a> <a href="#rfc.references.2">Informative References</a></li> |
|---|
| [119] | 495 | </ul> |
|---|
| 496 | </li> |
|---|
| [2726] | 497 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.A">A.</a> <a href="#compatibility">Compatibility with Previous Versions</a><ul> |
|---|
| 498 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.A.1">A.1</a> <a href="#changes.from.rfc.2616">Changes from RFC 2616</a></li> |
|---|
| [99] | 499 | </ul> |
|---|
| 500 | </li> |
|---|
| [2726] | 501 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.B">B.</a> <a href="#rfc.section.B">Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)</a><ul> |
|---|
| 502 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.B.1">B.1</a> <a href="#rfc.section.B.1">Since RFC2616</a></li> |
|---|
| 503 | <li><a href="#rfc.section.B.2">B.2</a> <a href="#rfc.section.B.2">Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-00</a></li> |
|---|
| [115] | 504 | </ul> |
|---|
| 505 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 506 | <li><a href="#rfc.index">Index</a></li> |
|---|
| [2726] | 507 | <li><a href="#rfc.authors">Authors' Addresses</a></li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 508 | <li><a href="#rfc.ipr">Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements</a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 509 | </ul> |
|---|
| [2726] | 510 | <div id="introduction"> |
|---|
| 511 | <h1 id="rfc.section.1" class="np"><a href="#rfc.section.1">1.</a> <a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></h1> |
|---|
| 512 | <p id="rfc.section.1.p.1">This document defines HTTP/1.1 response metadata for indicating potential changes to payload content, including modification |
|---|
| 513 | time stamps and opaque entity-tags, and the HTTP conditional request mechanisms that allow preconditions to be placed on a |
|---|
| 514 | request method. Conditional GET requests allow for efficient cache updates. Other conditional request methods are used to |
|---|
| 515 | protect against overwriting or misunderstanding the state of a resource that has been changed unbeknownst to the requesting |
|---|
| 516 | client. |
|---|
| 517 | </p> |
|---|
| 518 | <p id="rfc.section.1.p.2">This document is currently disorganized in order to minimize the changes between drafts and enable reviewers to see the smaller |
|---|
| 519 | errata changes. The next draft will reorganize the sections to better reflect the content. In particular, the sections on |
|---|
| 520 | resource metadata will be discussed first and then followed by each conditional request-header, concluding with a definition |
|---|
| 521 | of precedence and the expectation of ordering strong validator checks before weak validator checks. It is likely that more |
|---|
| 522 | content from <a href="#Part6" id="rfc.xref.Part6.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching">[Part6]</cite></a> will migrate to this part, where appropriate. The current mess reflects how widely dispersed these topics and associated requirements |
|---|
| 523 | had become in <a href="#RFC2616" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2616]</cite></a>. |
|---|
| 524 | </p> |
|---|
| 525 | <div id="intro.requirements"> |
|---|
| 526 | <h2 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1</a> <a href="#intro.requirements">Requirements</a></h2> |
|---|
| 527 | <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" |
|---|
| 528 | in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="#RFC2119" id="rfc.xref.RFC2119.1"><cite title="Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels">[RFC2119]</cite></a>. |
|---|
| 529 | </p> |
|---|
| 530 | <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.2">An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> or <em class="bcp14">REQUIRED</em> level and all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> level requirements but not all the <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> level requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant." |
|---|
| 531 | </p> |
|---|
| 532 | </div> |
|---|
| 533 | </div> |
|---|
| 534 | <div id="entity.tags"> |
|---|
| 535 | <h1 id="rfc.section.2"><a href="#rfc.section.2">2.</a> <a href="#entity.tags">Entity Tags</a></h1> |
|---|
| 536 | <p id="rfc.section.2.p.1">Entity tags are used for comparing two or more entities from the same requested resource. HTTP/1.1 uses entity tags in the |
|---|
| 537 | ETag (<a href="#header.etag" id="rfc.xref.header.etag.1" title="ETag">Section 6.1</a>), If-Match (<a href="#header.if-match" id="rfc.xref.header.if-match.1" title="If-Match">Section 6.2</a>), If-None-Match (<a href="#header.if-none-match" id="rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.1" title="If-None-Match">Section 6.4</a>), and If-Range (<a href="p5-range.html#header.if-range" title="If-Range">Section 5.3</a> of <a href="#Part5" id="rfc.xref.Part5.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 5: Range Requests and Partial Responses">[Part5]</cite></a>) header fields. The definition of how they are used and compared as cache validators is in <a href="#weak.and.strong.validators" title="Weak and Strong Validators">Section 4</a>. An entity tag consists of an opaque quoted string, possibly prefixed by a weakness indicator. |
|---|
| 538 | </p> |
|---|
| 539 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.1"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.1"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.2"></span><span id="rfc.iref.g.3"></span> entity-tag = [ weak ] opaque-tag |
|---|
| [135] | 540 | weak = "W/" |
|---|
| 541 | opaque-tag = quoted-string |
|---|
| [52] | 542 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.2.p.3">A "strong entity tag" <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be shared by two entities of a resource only if they are equivalent by octet equality. |
|---|
| [2726] | 543 | </p> |
|---|
| 544 | <p id="rfc.section.2.p.4">A "weak entity tag," indicated by the "W/" prefix, <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be shared by two entities of a resource only if the entities are equivalent and could be substituted for each other with no |
|---|
| 545 | significant change in semantics. A weak entity tag can only be used for weak comparison. |
|---|
| 546 | </p> |
|---|
| 547 | <p id="rfc.section.2.p.5">An entity tag <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be unique across all versions of all entities associated with a particular resource. A given entity tag value <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be used for entities obtained by requests on different URIs. The use of the same entity tag value in conjunction with entities |
|---|
| 548 | obtained by requests on different URIs does not imply the equivalence of those entities. |
|---|
| 549 | </p> |
|---|
| 550 | </div> |
|---|
| 551 | <div> |
|---|
| 552 | <h1 id="rfc.section.3"><a href="#rfc.section.3">3.</a> Status Code Definitions |
|---|
| 553 | </h1> |
|---|
| 554 | <div id="status.304"> |
|---|
| 555 | <div id="rfc.iref.3.1"></div> |
|---|
| 556 | <div id="rfc.iref.s.1"></div> |
|---|
| 557 | <h2 id="rfc.section.3.1"><a href="#rfc.section.3.1">3.1</a> <a href="#status.304">304 Not Modified</a></h2> |
|---|
| 558 | <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.1">If the client has performed a conditional GET request and access is allowed, but the document has not been modified, the server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> respond with this status code. The 304 response <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> contain a message-body, and thus is always terminated by the first empty line after the header fields. |
|---|
| 559 | </p> |
|---|
| 560 | <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.2">The response <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> include the following header fields: |
|---|
| 561 | </p> |
|---|
| 562 | <ul> |
|---|
| 563 | <li>Date, unless its omission is required by <a href="p1-messaging.html#clockless.origin.server.operation" title="Clockless Origin Server Operation">Section 8.3.1</a> of <a href="#Part1" id="rfc.xref.Part1.1"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing">[Part1]</cite></a></li> |
|---|
| 564 | </ul> |
|---|
| 565 | <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.3">If a clockless origin server obeys these rules, and proxies and clients add their own Date to any response received without |
|---|
| 566 | one (as already specified by <a href="#RFC2068" id="rfc.xref.RFC2068.1"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2068]</cite></a>, <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-14.19">Section 14.19</a>), caches will operate correctly. |
|---|
| 567 | </p> |
|---|
| 568 | <ul> |
|---|
| 569 | <li>ETag and/or Content-Location, if the header would have been sent in a 200 response to the same request</li> |
|---|
| 570 | <li>Expires, Cache-Control, and/or Vary, if the field-value might differ from that sent in any previous response for the same |
|---|
| 571 | variant |
|---|
| 572 | </li> |
|---|
| 573 | </ul> |
|---|
| 574 | <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.4">If the conditional GET used a strong cache validator (see <a href="#weak.and.strong.validators" title="Weak and Strong Validators">Section 4</a>), the response <em class="bcp14">SHOULD NOT</em> include other entity-headers. Otherwise (i.e., the conditional GET used a weak validator), the response <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> include other entity-headers; this prevents inconsistencies between cached entity-bodies and updated headers. |
|---|
| 575 | </p> |
|---|
| 576 | <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.5">If a 304 response indicates an entity not currently cached, then the cache <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> disregard the response and repeat the request without the conditional. |
|---|
| 577 | </p> |
|---|
| 578 | <p id="rfc.section.3.1.p.6">If a cache uses a received 304 response to update a cache entry, the cache <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> update the entry to reflect any new field values given in the response. |
|---|
| 579 | </p> |
|---|
| 580 | </div> |
|---|
| 581 | <div id="status.412"> |
|---|
| 582 | <div id="rfc.iref.4.1"></div> |
|---|
| 583 | <div id="rfc.iref.s.2"></div> |
|---|
| 584 | <h2 id="rfc.section.3.2"><a href="#rfc.section.3.2">3.2</a> <a href="#status.412">412 Precondition Failed</a></h2> |
|---|
| 585 | <p id="rfc.section.3.2.p.1">The precondition given in one or more of the request-header fields evaluated to false when it was tested on the server. This |
|---|
| 586 | response code allows the client to place preconditions on the current resource metainformation (header field data) and thus |
|---|
| 587 | prevent the requested method from being applied to a resource other than the one intended. |
|---|
| 588 | </p> |
|---|
| 589 | </div> |
|---|
| 590 | </div> |
|---|
| 591 | <div id="weak.and.strong.validators"> |
|---|
| 592 | <h1 id="rfc.section.4"><a href="#rfc.section.4">4.</a> <a href="#weak.and.strong.validators">Weak and Strong Validators</a></h1> |
|---|
| 593 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.1">Since both origin servers and caches will compare two validators to decide if they represent the same or different entities, |
|---|
| 594 | one normally would expect that if the entity (the entity-body or any entity-headers) changes in any way, then the associated |
|---|
| 595 | validator would change as well. If this is true, then we call this validator a "strong validator." |
|---|
| 596 | </p> |
|---|
| 597 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.2">However, there might be cases when a server prefers to change the validator only on semantically significant changes, and |
|---|
| 598 | not when insignificant aspects of the entity change. A validator that does not always change when the resource changes is |
|---|
| 599 | a "weak validator." |
|---|
| 600 | </p> |
|---|
| 601 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.3">Entity tags are normally "strong validators," but the protocol provides a mechanism to tag an entity tag as "weak." One can |
|---|
| 602 | think of a strong validator as one that changes whenever the bits of an entity changes, while a weak value changes whenever |
|---|
| 603 | the meaning of an entity changes. Alternatively, one can think of a strong validator as part of an identifier for a specific |
|---|
| 604 | entity, while a weak validator is part of an identifier for a set of semantically equivalent entities. |
|---|
| 605 | </p> |
|---|
| 606 | <ul class="empty"> |
|---|
| 607 | <li><b>Note:</b> One example of a strong validator is an integer that is incremented in stable storage every time an entity is changed. |
|---|
| 608 | </li> |
|---|
| 609 | <li>An entity's modification time, if represented with one-second resolution, could be a weak validator, since it is possible |
|---|
| 610 | that the resource might be modified twice during a single second. |
|---|
| 611 | </li> |
|---|
| 612 | <li>Support for weak validators is optional. However, weak validators allow for more efficient caching of equivalent objects; |
|---|
| 613 | for example, a hit counter on a site is probably good enough if it is updated every few days or weeks, and any value during |
|---|
| 614 | that period is likely "good enough" to be equivalent. |
|---|
| 615 | </li> |
|---|
| 616 | </ul> |
|---|
| 617 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.4">A "use" of a validator is either when a client generates a request and includes the validator in a validating header field, |
|---|
| 618 | or when a server compares two validators. |
|---|
| 619 | </p> |
|---|
| 620 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.5">Strong validators are usable in any context. Weak validators are only usable in contexts that do not depend on exact equality |
|---|
| 621 | of an entity. For example, either kind is usable for a conditional GET of a full entity. However, only a strong validator |
|---|
| 622 | is usable for a sub-range retrieval, since otherwise the client might end up with an internally inconsistent entity. |
|---|
| 623 | </p> |
|---|
| 624 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.6">Clients <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> issue simple (non-subrange) GET requests with either weak validators or strong validators. Clients <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> use weak validators in other forms of request. |
|---|
| 625 | </p> |
|---|
| 626 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.7">The only function that the HTTP/1.1 protocol defines on validators is comparison. There are two validator comparison functions, |
|---|
| 627 | depending on whether the comparison context allows the use of weak validators or not: |
|---|
| 628 | </p> |
|---|
| 629 | <ul> |
|---|
| 630 | <li>The strong comparison function: in order to be considered equal, both validators <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be identical in every way, and both <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be weak. |
|---|
| 631 | </li> |
|---|
| 632 | <li>The weak comparison function: in order to be considered equal, both validators <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be identical in every way, but either or both of them <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be tagged as "weak" without affecting the result. |
|---|
| 633 | </li> |
|---|
| 634 | </ul> |
|---|
| 635 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.8">An entity tag is strong unless it is explicitly tagged as weak. <a href="#entity.tags" title="Entity Tags">Section 2</a> gives the syntax for entity tags. |
|---|
| 636 | </p> |
|---|
| 637 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.9">A Last-Modified time, when used as a validator in a request, is implicitly weak unless it is possible to deduce that it is |
|---|
| 638 | strong, using the following rules: |
|---|
| 639 | </p> |
|---|
| 640 | <ul> |
|---|
| 641 | <li>The validator is being compared by an origin server to the actual current validator for the entity and,</li> |
|---|
| 642 | <li>That origin server reliably knows that the associated entity did not change twice during the second covered by the presented |
|---|
| 643 | validator. |
|---|
| 644 | </li> |
|---|
| 645 | </ul> |
|---|
| 646 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.10">or </p> |
|---|
| 647 | <ul> |
|---|
| 648 | <li>The validator is about to be used by a client in an If-Modified-Since or If-Unmodified-Since header, because the client has |
|---|
| 649 | a cache entry for the associated entity, and |
|---|
| 650 | </li> |
|---|
| 651 | <li>That cache entry includes a Date value, which gives the time when the origin server sent the original response, and</li> |
|---|
| 652 | <li>The presented Last-Modified time is at least 60 seconds before the Date value.</li> |
|---|
| 653 | </ul> |
|---|
| 654 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.11">or </p> |
|---|
| 655 | <ul> |
|---|
| 656 | <li>The validator is being compared by an intermediate cache to the validator stored in its cache entry for the entity, and</li> |
|---|
| 657 | <li>That cache entry includes a Date value, which gives the time when the origin server sent the original response, and</li> |
|---|
| 658 | <li>The presented Last-Modified time is at least 60 seconds before the Date value.</li> |
|---|
| 659 | </ul> |
|---|
| 660 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.12">This method relies on the fact that if two different responses were sent by the origin server during the same second, but |
|---|
| 661 | both had the same Last-Modified time, then at least one of those responses would have a Date value equal to its Last-Modified |
|---|
| 662 | time. The arbitrary 60-second limit guards against the possibility that the Date and Last-Modified values are generated from |
|---|
| 663 | different clocks, or at somewhat different times during the preparation of the response. An implementation <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> use a value larger than 60 seconds, if it is believed that 60 seconds is too short. |
|---|
| 664 | </p> |
|---|
| 665 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.13">If a client wishes to perform a sub-range retrieval on a value for which it has only a Last-Modified time and no opaque validator, |
|---|
| 666 | it <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> do this only if the Last-Modified time is strong in the sense described here. |
|---|
| 667 | </p> |
|---|
| 668 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.14">A cache or origin server receiving a conditional request, other than a full-body GET request, <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> use the strong comparison function to evaluate the condition. |
|---|
| 669 | </p> |
|---|
| 670 | <p id="rfc.section.4.p.15">These rules allow HTTP/1.1 caches and clients to safely perform sub-range retrievals on values that have been obtained from |
|---|
| 671 | HTTP/1.0 servers. |
|---|
| 672 | </p> |
|---|
| 673 | </div> |
|---|
| 674 | <div id="rules.for.when.to.use.entity.tags.and.last-modified.dates"> |
|---|
| 675 | <h1 id="rfc.section.5"><a href="#rfc.section.5">5.</a> <a href="#rules.for.when.to.use.entity.tags.and.last-modified.dates">Rules for When to Use Entity Tags and Last-Modified Dates</a></h1> |
|---|
| 676 | <p id="rfc.section.5.p.1">We adopt a set of rules and recommendations for origin servers, clients, and caches regarding when various validator types |
|---|
| 677 | ought to be used, and for what purposes. |
|---|
| 678 | </p> |
|---|
| 679 | <p id="rfc.section.5.p.2">HTTP/1.1 origin servers: </p> |
|---|
| 680 | <ul> |
|---|
| 681 | <li><em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send an entity tag validator unless it is not feasible to generate one. |
|---|
| 682 | </li> |
|---|
| 683 | <li><em class="bcp14">MAY</em> send a weak entity tag instead of a strong entity tag, if performance considerations support the use of weak entity tags, |
|---|
| 684 | or if it is unfeasible to send a strong entity tag. |
|---|
| 685 | </li> |
|---|
| 686 | <li><em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send a Last-Modified value if it is feasible to send one, unless the risk of a breakdown in semantic transparency that could |
|---|
| 687 | result from using this date in an If-Modified-Since header would lead to serious problems. |
|---|
| 688 | </li> |
|---|
| 689 | </ul> |
|---|
| 690 | <p id="rfc.section.5.p.3">In other words, the preferred behavior for an HTTP/1.1 origin server is to send both a strong entity tag and a Last-Modified |
|---|
| 691 | value. |
|---|
| 692 | </p> |
|---|
| 693 | <p id="rfc.section.5.p.4">In order to be legal, a strong entity tag <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> change whenever the associated entity value changes in any way. A weak entity tag <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> change whenever the associated entity changes in a semantically significant way. |
|---|
| 694 | </p> |
|---|
| 695 | <ul class="empty"> |
|---|
| 696 | <li><b>Note:</b> in order to provide semantically transparent caching, an origin server must avoid reusing a specific strong entity tag value |
|---|
| 697 | for two different entities, or reusing a specific weak entity tag value for two semantically different entities. Cache entries |
|---|
| 698 | might persist for arbitrarily long periods, regardless of expiration times, so it might be inappropriate to expect that a |
|---|
| 699 | cache will never again attempt to validate an entry using a validator that it obtained at some point in the past. |
|---|
| 700 | </li> |
|---|
| 701 | </ul> |
|---|
| 702 | <p id="rfc.section.5.p.5">HTTP/1.1 clients: </p> |
|---|
| 703 | <ul> |
|---|
| 704 | <li>If an entity tag has been provided by the origin server, <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> use that entity tag in any cache-conditional request (using If-Match or If-None-Match). |
|---|
| 705 | </li> |
|---|
| 706 | <li>If only a Last-Modified value has been provided by the origin server, <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> use that value in non-subrange cache-conditional requests (using If-Modified-Since). |
|---|
| 707 | </li> |
|---|
| 708 | <li>If only a Last-Modified value has been provided by an HTTP/1.0 origin server, <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> use that value in subrange cache-conditional requests (using If-Unmodified-Since:). The user agent <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> provide a way to disable this, in case of difficulty. |
|---|
| 709 | </li> |
|---|
| 710 | <li>If both an entity tag and a Last-Modified value have been provided by the origin server, <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> use both validators in cache-conditional requests. This allows both HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1 caches to respond appropriately. |
|---|
| 711 | </li> |
|---|
| 712 | </ul> |
|---|
| 713 | <p id="rfc.section.5.p.6">An HTTP/1.1 origin server, upon receiving a conditional request that includes both a Last-Modified date (e.g., in an If-Modified-Since |
|---|
| 714 | or If-Unmodified-Since header field) and one or more entity tags (e.g., in an If-Match, If-None-Match, or If-Range header |
|---|
| 715 | field) as cache validators, <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> return a response status of 304 (Not Modified) unless doing so is consistent with all of the conditional header fields in |
|---|
| 716 | the request. |
|---|
| 717 | </p> |
|---|
| 718 | <p id="rfc.section.5.p.7">An HTTP/1.1 caching proxy, upon receiving a conditional request that includes both a Last-Modified date and one or more entity |
|---|
| 719 | tags as cache validators, <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> return a locally cached response to the client unless that cached response is consistent with all of the conditional header |
|---|
| 720 | fields in the request. |
|---|
| 721 | </p> |
|---|
| 722 | <ul class="empty"> |
|---|
| 723 | <li><b>Note:</b> The general principle behind these rules is that HTTP/1.1 servers and clients should transmit as much non-redundant information |
|---|
| 724 | as is available in their responses and requests. HTTP/1.1 systems receiving this information will make the most conservative |
|---|
| 725 | assumptions about the validators they receive. |
|---|
| 726 | </li> |
|---|
| 727 | <li>HTTP/1.0 clients and caches will ignore entity tags. Generally, last-modified values received or used by these systems will |
|---|
| 728 | support transparent and efficient caching, and so HTTP/1.1 origin servers should provide Last-Modified values. In those rare |
|---|
| 729 | cases where the use of a Last-Modified value as a validator by an HTTP/1.0 system could result in a serious problem, then |
|---|
| 730 | HTTP/1.1 origin servers should not provide one. |
|---|
| 731 | </li> |
|---|
| 732 | </ul> |
|---|
| 733 | </div> |
|---|
| 734 | <div id="header.fields"> |
|---|
| 735 | <h1 id="rfc.section.6"><a href="#rfc.section.6">6.</a> <a href="#header.fields">Header Field Definitions</a></h1> |
|---|
| 736 | <p id="rfc.section.6.p.1">This section defines the syntax and semantics of HTTP/1.1 header fields related to conditional requests.</p> |
|---|
| 737 | <p id="rfc.section.6.p.2">For entity-header fields, both sender and recipient refer to either the client or the server, depending on who sends and who |
|---|
| 738 | receives the entity. |
|---|
| 739 | </p> |
|---|
| 740 | <div id="header.etag"> |
|---|
| 741 | <div id="rfc.iref.e.1"></div> |
|---|
| 742 | <div id="rfc.iref.h.1"></div> |
|---|
| 743 | <h2 id="rfc.section.6.1"><a href="#rfc.section.6.1">6.1</a> <a href="#header.etag">ETag</a></h2> |
|---|
| 744 | <p id="rfc.section.6.1.p.1">The ETag response-header field provides the current value of the entity tag for the requested variant. The headers used with |
|---|
| 745 | entity tags are described in Sections <a href="#header.if-match" id="rfc.xref.header.if-match.2" title="If-Match">6.2</a> and <a href="#header.if-none-match" id="rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.2" title="If-None-Match">6.4</a> of this document, and in <a href="p5-range.html#header.if-range" title="If-Range">Section 5.3</a> of <a href="#Part5" id="rfc.xref.Part5.2"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 5: Range Requests and Partial Responses">[Part5]</cite></a>. The entity tag <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> be used for comparison with other entities from the same resource (see <a href="#weak.and.strong.validators" title="Weak and Strong Validators">Section 4</a>). |
|---|
| 746 | </p> |
|---|
| 747 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.2"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.4"></span> ETag = "ETag" ":" entity-tag |
|---|
| [52] | 748 | </pre><div id="rfc.figure.u.3"></div> |
|---|
| [2726] | 749 | <p>Examples:</p><pre class="text"> ETag: "xyzzy" |
|---|
| [52] | 750 | ETag: W/"xyzzy" |
|---|
| 751 | ETag: "" |
|---|
| [2726] | 752 | </pre></div> |
|---|
| 753 | <div id="header.if-match"> |
|---|
| 754 | <div id="rfc.iref.i.1"></div> |
|---|
| 755 | <div id="rfc.iref.h.2"></div> |
|---|
| 756 | <h2 id="rfc.section.6.2"><a href="#rfc.section.6.2">6.2</a> <a href="#header.if-match">If-Match</a></h2> |
|---|
| 757 | <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.1">The If-Match request-header field is used with a method to make it conditional. A client that has one or more entities previously |
|---|
| 758 | obtained from the resource can verify that one of those entities is current by including a list of their associated entity |
|---|
| 759 | tags in the If-Match header field. Entity tags are defined in <a href="#entity.tags" title="Entity Tags">Section 2</a>. The purpose of this feature is to allow efficient updates of cached information with a minimum amount of transaction overhead. |
|---|
| 760 | It is also used, on updating requests, to prevent inadvertent modification of the wrong version of a resource. As a special |
|---|
| 761 | case, the value "*" matches any current entity of the resource. |
|---|
| 762 | </p> |
|---|
| 763 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.4"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.5"></span> If-Match = "If-Match" ":" ( "*" | 1#entity-tag ) |
|---|
| [52] | 764 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.3">If any of the entity tags match the entity tag of the entity that would have been returned in the response to a similar GET |
|---|
| [2726] | 765 | request (without the If-Match header) on that resource, or if "*" is given and any current entity exists for that resource, |
|---|
| 766 | then the server <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> perform the requested method as if the If-Match header field did not exist. |
|---|
| 767 | </p> |
|---|
| 768 | <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.4">A server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> use the strong comparison function (see <a href="#weak.and.strong.validators" title="Weak and Strong Validators">Section 4</a>) to compare the entity tags in If-Match. |
|---|
| 769 | </p> |
|---|
| 770 | <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.5">If none of the entity tags match, or if "*" is given and no current entity exists, the server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> perform the requested method, and <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> return a 412 (Precondition Failed) response. This behavior is most useful when the client wants to prevent an updating method, |
|---|
| 771 | such as PUT, from modifying a resource that has changed since the client last retrieved it. |
|---|
| 772 | </p> |
|---|
| 773 | <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.6">If the request would, without the If-Match header field, result in anything other than a 2xx or 412 status, then the If-Match |
|---|
| 774 | header <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be ignored. |
|---|
| 775 | </p> |
|---|
| 776 | <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.7">The meaning of "If-Match: *" is that the method <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be performed if the representation selected by the origin server (or by a cache, possibly using the Vary mechanism, see <a href="p6-cache.html#header.vary" title="Vary">Section 15.5</a> of <a href="#Part6" id="rfc.xref.Part6.2"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching">[Part6]</cite></a>) exists, and <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be performed if the representation does not exist. |
|---|
| 777 | </p> |
|---|
| 778 | <p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.8">A request intended to update a resource (e.g., a PUT) <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> include an If-Match header field to signal that the request method <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be applied if the entity corresponding to the If-Match value (a single entity tag) is no longer a representation of that resource. |
|---|
| 779 | This allows the user to indicate that they do not wish the request to be successful if the resource has been changed without |
|---|
| 780 | their knowledge. Examples: |
|---|
| 781 | </p> |
|---|
| 782 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.5"></div><pre class="text"> If-Match: "xyzzy" |
|---|
| [52] | 783 | If-Match: "xyzzy", "r2d2xxxx", "c3piozzzz" |
|---|
| 784 | If-Match: * |
|---|
| 785 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.2.p.10">The result of a request having both an If-Match header field and either an If-None-Match or an If-Modified-Since header fields |
|---|
| [2726] | 786 | is undefined by this specification. |
|---|
| 787 | </p> |
|---|
| 788 | </div> |
|---|
| 789 | <div id="header.if-modified-since"> |
|---|
| 790 | <div id="rfc.iref.i.2"></div> |
|---|
| 791 | <div id="rfc.iref.h.3"></div> |
|---|
| 792 | <h2 id="rfc.section.6.3"><a href="#rfc.section.6.3">6.3</a> <a href="#header.if-modified-since">If-Modified-Since</a></h2> |
|---|
| 793 | <p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.1">The If-Modified-Since request-header field is used with a method to make it conditional: if the requested variant has not |
|---|
| 794 | been modified since the time specified in this field, an entity will not be returned from the server; instead, a 304 (Not |
|---|
| 795 | Modified) response will be returned without any message-body. |
|---|
| 796 | </p> |
|---|
| 797 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.6"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.6"></span> If-Modified-Since = "If-Modified-Since" ":" HTTP-date |
|---|
| [52] | 798 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.3">An example of the field is:</p> |
|---|
| [2726] | 799 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.7"></div><pre class="text"> If-Modified-Since: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 19:43:31 GMT |
|---|
| [52] | 800 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.5">A GET method with an If-Modified-Since header and no Range header requests that the identified entity be transferred only |
|---|
| [2726] | 801 | if it has been modified since the date given by the If-Modified-Since header. The algorithm for determining this includes |
|---|
| 802 | the following cases: |
|---|
| 803 | </p> |
|---|
| 804 | <ol> |
|---|
| 805 | <li>If the request would normally result in anything other than a 200 (OK) status, or if the passed If-Modified-Since date is |
|---|
| 806 | invalid, the response is exactly the same as for a normal GET. A date which is later than the server's current time is invalid. |
|---|
| 807 | </li> |
|---|
| 808 | <li>If the variant has been modified since the If-Modified-Since date, the response is exactly the same as for a normal GET.</li> |
|---|
| 809 | <li>If the variant has not been modified since a valid If-Modified-Since date, the server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> return a 304 (Not Modified) response. |
|---|
| 810 | </li> |
|---|
| 811 | </ol> |
|---|
| 812 | <p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.6">The purpose of this feature is to allow efficient updates of cached information with a minimum amount of transaction overhead. </p> |
|---|
| 813 | <ul class="empty"> |
|---|
| 814 | <li><b>Note:</b> The Range request-header field modifies the meaning of If-Modified-Since; see <a href="p5-range.html#header.range" title="Range">Section 5.4</a> of <a href="#Part5" id="rfc.xref.Part5.3"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 5: Range Requests and Partial Responses">[Part5]</cite></a> for full details. |
|---|
| 815 | </li> |
|---|
| 816 | <li><b>Note:</b> If-Modified-Since times are interpreted by the server, whose clock might not be synchronized with the client. |
|---|
| 817 | </li> |
|---|
| 818 | <li><b>Note:</b> When handling an If-Modified-Since header field, some servers will use an exact date comparison function, rather than a less-than |
|---|
| 819 | function, for deciding whether to send a 304 (Not Modified) response. To get best results when sending an If-Modified-Since |
|---|
| 820 | header field for cache validation, clients are advised to use the exact date string received in a previous Last-Modified header |
|---|
| 821 | field whenever possible. |
|---|
| 822 | </li> |
|---|
| 823 | <li><b>Note:</b> If a client uses an arbitrary date in the If-Modified-Since header instead of a date taken from the Last-Modified header for |
|---|
| 824 | the same request, the client should be aware of the fact that this date is interpreted in the server's understanding of time. |
|---|
| 825 | The client should consider unsynchronized clocks and rounding problems due to the different encodings of time between the |
|---|
| 826 | client and server. This includes the possibility of race conditions if the document has changed between the time it was first |
|---|
| 827 | requested and the If-Modified-Since date of a subsequent request, and the possibility of clock-skew-related problems if the |
|---|
| 828 | If-Modified-Since date is derived from the client's clock without correction to the server's clock. Corrections for different |
|---|
| 829 | time bases between client and server are at best approximate due to network latency. |
|---|
| 830 | </li> |
|---|
| 831 | </ul> |
|---|
| 832 | <p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.7">The result of a request having both an If-Modified-Since header field and either an If-Match or an If-Unmodified-Since header |
|---|
| 833 | fields is undefined by this specification. |
|---|
| 834 | </p> |
|---|
| 835 | </div> |
|---|
| 836 | <div id="header.if-none-match"> |
|---|
| 837 | <div id="rfc.iref.i.3"></div> |
|---|
| 838 | <div id="rfc.iref.h.4"></div> |
|---|
| 839 | <h2 id="rfc.section.6.4"><a href="#rfc.section.6.4">6.4</a> <a href="#header.if-none-match">If-None-Match</a></h2> |
|---|
| 840 | <p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.1">The If-None-Match request-header field is used with a method to make it conditional. A client that has one or more entities |
|---|
| 841 | previously obtained from the resource can verify that none of those entities is current by including a list of their associated |
|---|
| 842 | entity tags in the If-None-Match header field. The purpose of this feature is to allow efficient updates of cached information |
|---|
| 843 | with a minimum amount of transaction overhead. It is also used to prevent a method (e.g. PUT) from inadvertently modifying |
|---|
| 844 | an existing resource when the client believes that the resource does not exist. |
|---|
| 845 | </p> |
|---|
| 846 | <p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.2">As a special case, the value "*" matches any current entity of the resource.</p> |
|---|
| 847 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.8"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.7"></span> If-None-Match = "If-None-Match" ":" ( "*" | 1#entity-tag ) |
|---|
| [52] | 848 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.4">If any of the entity tags match the entity tag of the entity that would have been returned in the response to a similar GET |
|---|
| [2726] | 849 | request (without the If-None-Match header) on that resource, or if "*" is given and any current entity exists for that resource, |
|---|
| 850 | then the server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> perform the requested method, unless required to do so because the resource's modification date fails to match that supplied |
|---|
| 851 | in an If-Modified-Since header field in the request. Instead, if the request method was GET or HEAD, the server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> respond with a 304 (Not Modified) response, including the cache-related header fields (particularly ETag) of one of the entities |
|---|
| 852 | that matched. For all other request methods, the server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> respond with a status of 412 (Precondition Failed). |
|---|
| 853 | </p> |
|---|
| 854 | <p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.5">See <a href="#weak.and.strong.validators" title="Weak and Strong Validators">Section 4</a> for rules on how to determine if two entities tags match. The weak comparison function can only be used with GET or HEAD requests. |
|---|
| 855 | </p> |
|---|
| 856 | <p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.6">If none of the entity tags match, then the server <em class="bcp14">MAY</em> perform the requested method as if the If-None-Match header field did not exist, but <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> also ignore any If-Modified-Since header field(s) in the request. That is, if no entity tags match, then the server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> return a 304 (Not Modified) response. |
|---|
| 857 | </p> |
|---|
| 858 | <p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.7">If the request would, without the If-None-Match header field, result in anything other than a 2xx or 304 status, then the |
|---|
| 859 | If-None-Match header <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> be ignored. (See <a href="#rules.for.when.to.use.entity.tags.and.last-modified.dates" title="Rules for When to Use Entity Tags and Last-Modified Dates">Section 5</a> for a discussion of server behavior when both If-Modified-Since and If-None-Match appear in the same request.) |
|---|
| 860 | </p> |
|---|
| 861 | <p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.8">The meaning of "If-None-Match: *" is that the method <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> be performed if the representation selected by the origin server (or by a cache, possibly using the Vary mechanism, see <a href="p6-cache.html#header.vary" title="Vary">Section 15.5</a> of <a href="#Part6" id="rfc.xref.Part6.3"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching">[Part6]</cite></a>) exists, and <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be performed if the representation does not exist. This feature is intended to be useful in preventing races between PUT operations. |
|---|
| 862 | </p> |
|---|
| 863 | <p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.9">Examples:</p> |
|---|
| 864 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.9"></div><pre class="text"> If-None-Match: "xyzzy" |
|---|
| [52] | 865 | If-None-Match: W/"xyzzy" |
|---|
| 866 | If-None-Match: "xyzzy", "r2d2xxxx", "c3piozzzz" |
|---|
| 867 | If-None-Match: W/"xyzzy", W/"r2d2xxxx", W/"c3piozzzz" |
|---|
| 868 | If-None-Match: * |
|---|
| 869 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.11">The result of a request having both an If-None-Match header field and either an If-Match or an If-Unmodified-Since header |
|---|
| [2726] | 870 | fields is undefined by this specification. |
|---|
| 871 | </p> |
|---|
| 872 | </div> |
|---|
| 873 | <div id="header.if-unmodified-since"> |
|---|
| 874 | <div id="rfc.iref.i.4"></div> |
|---|
| 875 | <div id="rfc.iref.h.5"></div> |
|---|
| 876 | <h2 id="rfc.section.6.5"><a href="#rfc.section.6.5">6.5</a> <a href="#header.if-unmodified-since">If-Unmodified-Since</a></h2> |
|---|
| 877 | <p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.1">The If-Unmodified-Since request-header field is used with a method to make it conditional. If the requested resource has not |
|---|
| 878 | been modified since the time specified in this field, the server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> perform the requested operation as if the If-Unmodified-Since header were not present. |
|---|
| 879 | </p> |
|---|
| 880 | <p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.2">If the requested variant has been modified since the specified time, the server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> perform the requested operation, and <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> return a 412 (Precondition Failed). |
|---|
| 881 | </p> |
|---|
| 882 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.10"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.8"></span> If-Unmodified-Since = "If-Unmodified-Since" ":" HTTP-date |
|---|
| [52] | 883 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.4">An example of the field is:</p> |
|---|
| [2726] | 884 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.11"></div><pre class="text"> If-Unmodified-Since: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 19:43:31 GMT |
|---|
| [52] | 885 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.6">If the request normally (i.e., without the If-Unmodified-Since header) would result in anything other than a 2xx or 412 status, |
|---|
| [2726] | 886 | the If-Unmodified-Since header <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> be ignored. |
|---|
| 887 | </p> |
|---|
| 888 | <p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.7">If the specified date is invalid, the header is ignored.</p> |
|---|
| 889 | <p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.8">The result of a request having both an If-Unmodified-Since header field and either an If-None-Match or an If-Modified-Since |
|---|
| 890 | header fields is undefined by this specification. |
|---|
| 891 | </p> |
|---|
| 892 | </div> |
|---|
| 893 | <div id="header.last-modified"> |
|---|
| 894 | <div id="rfc.iref.l.1"></div> |
|---|
| 895 | <div id="rfc.iref.h.6"></div> |
|---|
| 896 | <h2 id="rfc.section.6.6"><a href="#rfc.section.6.6">6.6</a> <a href="#header.last-modified">Last-Modified</a></h2> |
|---|
| 897 | <p id="rfc.section.6.6.p.1">The Last-Modified entity-header field indicates the date and time at which the origin server believes the variant was last |
|---|
| 898 | modified. |
|---|
| 899 | </p> |
|---|
| 900 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.12"></div><pre class="inline"><span id="rfc.iref.g.9"></span> Last-Modified = "Last-Modified" ":" HTTP-date |
|---|
| [52] | 901 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.6.p.3">An example of its use is</p> |
|---|
| [2726] | 902 | <div id="rfc.figure.u.13"></div><pre class="text"> Last-Modified: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 12:45:26 GMT |
|---|
| [52] | 903 | </pre><p id="rfc.section.6.6.p.5">The exact meaning of this header field depends on the implementation of the origin server and the nature of the original resource. |
|---|
| [2726] | 904 | For files, it may be just the file system last-modified time. For entities with dynamically included parts, it may be the |
|---|
| 905 | most recent of the set of last-modify times for its component parts. For database gateways, it may be the last-update time |
|---|
| 906 | stamp of the record. For virtual objects, it may be the last time the internal state changed. |
|---|
| 907 | </p> |
|---|
| 908 | <p id="rfc.section.6.6.p.6">An origin server <em class="bcp14">MUST NOT</em> send a Last-Modified date which is later than the server's time of message origination. In such cases, where the resource's |
|---|
| 909 | last modification would indicate some time in the future, the server <em class="bcp14">MUST</em> replace that date with the message origination date. |
|---|
| 910 | </p> |
|---|
| 911 | <p id="rfc.section.6.6.p.7">An origin server <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> obtain the Last-Modified value of the entity as close as possible to the time that it generates the Date value of its response. |
|---|
| 912 | This allows a recipient to make an accurate assessment of the entity's modification time, especially if the entity changes |
|---|
| 913 | near the time that the response is generated. |
|---|
| 914 | </p> |
|---|
| 915 | <p id="rfc.section.6.6.p.8">HTTP/1.1 servers <em class="bcp14">SHOULD</em> send Last-Modified whenever feasible. |
|---|
| 916 | </p> |
|---|
| 917 | </div> |
|---|
| 918 | </div> |
|---|
| 919 | <div id="IANA.considerations"> |
|---|
| 920 | <h1 id="rfc.section.7"><a href="#rfc.section.7">7.</a> <a href="#IANA.considerations">IANA Considerations</a></h1> |
|---|
| 921 | <p id="rfc.section.7.p.1">TBD.</p> |
|---|
| 922 | </div> |
|---|
| 923 | <div id="security.considerations"> |
|---|
| 924 | <h1 id="rfc.section.8"><a href="#rfc.section.8">8.</a> <a href="#security.considerations">Security Considerations</a></h1> |
|---|
| 925 | <p id="rfc.section.8.p.1">No additional security considerations have been identified beyond those applicable to HTTP in general <a href="#Part1" id="rfc.xref.Part1.2"><cite title="HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing">[Part1]</cite></a>. |
|---|
| 926 | </p> |
|---|
| 927 | </div> |
|---|
| 928 | <div id="ack"> |
|---|
| 929 | <h1 id="rfc.section.9"><a href="#rfc.section.9">9.</a> <a href="#ack">Acknowledgments</a></h1> |
|---|
| 930 | </div> |
|---|
| [119] | 931 | <h1 id="rfc.references"><a id="rfc.section.10" href="#rfc.section.10">10.</a> References |
|---|
| [52] | 932 | </h1> |
|---|
| [119] | 933 | <h2 id="rfc.references.1"><a href="#rfc.section.10.1" id="rfc.section.10.1">10.1</a> Normative References |
|---|
| 934 | </h2> |
|---|
| [2726] | 935 | <table> |
|---|
| [52] | 936 | <tr> |
|---|
| 937 | <td class="reference"><b id="Part1">[Part1]</b></td> |
|---|
| [2726] | 938 | <td class="top"><a href="mailto:fielding@gbiv.com" title="Day Software">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a href="mailto:jg@laptop.org" title="One Laptop per Child">Gettys, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:JeffMogul@acm.org" title="Hewlett-Packard Company">Mogul, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a href="mailto:LMM@acm.org" title="Adobe Systems, Incorporated">Masinter, L.</a>, <a href="mailto:paulle@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, <a href="mailto:timbl@w3.org" title="World Wide Web Consortium">Berners-Lee, T.</a>, <a href="mailto:ylafon@w3.org" title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a href="mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de" title="greenbytes GmbH">J. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-01">HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing</a>”, Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-01 (work in progress), January 2008. |
|---|
| [52] | 939 | </td> |
|---|
| 940 | </tr> |
|---|
| 941 | <tr> |
|---|
| 942 | <td class="reference"><b id="Part5">[Part5]</b></td> |
|---|
| [2726] | 943 | <td class="top"><a href="mailto:fielding@gbiv.com" title="Day Software">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a href="mailto:jg@laptop.org" title="One Laptop per Child">Gettys, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:JeffMogul@acm.org" title="Hewlett-Packard Company">Mogul, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a href="mailto:LMM@acm.org" title="Adobe Systems, Incorporated">Masinter, L.</a>, <a href="mailto:paulle@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, <a href="mailto:timbl@w3.org" title="World Wide Web Consortium">Berners-Lee, T.</a>, <a href="mailto:ylafon@w3.org" title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a href="mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de" title="greenbytes GmbH">J. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-01">HTTP/1.1, part 5: Range Requests and Partial Responses</a>”, Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-01 (work in progress), January 2008. |
|---|
| [52] | 944 | </td> |
|---|
| 945 | </tr> |
|---|
| 946 | <tr> |
|---|
| 947 | <td class="reference"><b id="Part6">[Part6]</b></td> |
|---|
| [2726] | 948 | <td class="top"><a href="mailto:fielding@gbiv.com" title="Day Software">Fielding, R., Ed.</a>, <a href="mailto:jg@laptop.org" title="One Laptop per Child">Gettys, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:JeffMogul@acm.org" title="Hewlett-Packard Company">Mogul, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a href="mailto:LMM@acm.org" title="Adobe Systems, Incorporated">Masinter, L.</a>, <a href="mailto:paulle@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, <a href="mailto:timbl@w3.org" title="World Wide Web Consortium">Berners-Lee, T.</a>, <a href="mailto:ylafon@w3.org" title="World Wide Web Consortium">Lafon, Y., Ed.</a>, and <a href="mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de" title="greenbytes GmbH">J. Reschke, Ed.</a>, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-01">HTTP/1.1, part 6: Caching</a>”, Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-01 (work in progress), January 2008. |
|---|
| [52] | 949 | </td> |
|---|
| 950 | </tr> |
|---|
| 951 | <tr> |
|---|
| [119] | 952 | <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2119">[RFC2119]</b></td> |
|---|
| [2726] | 953 | <td class="top"><a href="mailto:sob@harvard.edu" title="Harvard University">Bradner, S.</a>, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>”, BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
|---|
| [52] | 954 | </td> |
|---|
| 955 | </tr> |
|---|
| [119] | 956 | </table> |
|---|
| 957 | <h2 id="rfc.references.2"><a href="#rfc.section.10.2" id="rfc.section.10.2">10.2</a> Informative References |
|---|
| 958 | </h2> |
|---|
| [2726] | 959 | <table> |
|---|
| [52] | 960 | <tr> |
|---|
| [119] | 961 | <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2068">[RFC2068]</b></td> |
|---|
| [2726] | 962 | <td class="top"><a href="mailto:fielding@ics.uci.edu" title="University of California, Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science">Fielding, R.</a>, <a href="mailto:jg@w3.org" title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Gettys, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:mogul@wrl.dec.com" title="Digital Equipment Corporation, Western Research Laboratory">Mogul, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:frystyk@w3.org" title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Nielsen, H.</a>, and <a href="mailto:timbl@w3.org" title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">T. Berners-Lee</a>, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a>”, RFC 2068, January 1997. |
|---|
| [96] | 963 | </td> |
|---|
| 964 | </tr> |
|---|
| 965 | <tr> |
|---|
| [52] | 966 | <td class="reference"><b id="RFC2616">[RFC2616]</b></td> |
|---|
| [2726] | 967 | <td class="top"><a href="mailto:fielding@ics.uci.edu" title="University of California, Irvine">Fielding, R.</a>, <a href="mailto:jg@w3.org" title="W3C">Gettys, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:mogul@wrl.dec.com" title="Compaq Computer Corporation">Mogul, J.</a>, <a href="mailto:frystyk@w3.org" title="MIT Laboratory for Computer Science">Frystyk, H.</a>, <a href="mailto:masinter@parc.xerox.com" title="Xerox Corporation">Masinter, L.</a>, <a href="mailto:paulle@microsoft.com" title="Microsoft Corporation">Leach, P.</a>, and <a href="mailto:timbl@w3.org" title="W3C">T. Berners-Lee</a>, “<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616">Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a>”, RFC 2616, June 1999. |
|---|
| [52] | 968 | </td> |
|---|
| 969 | </tr> |
|---|
| 970 | </table> |
|---|
| [2726] | 971 | <div id="compatibility"> |
|---|
| 972 | <h1 id="rfc.section.A" class="np"><a href="#rfc.section.A">A.</a> <a href="#compatibility">Compatibility with Previous Versions</a></h1> |
|---|
| 973 | <div id="changes.from.rfc.2616"> |
|---|
| 974 | <h2 id="rfc.section.A.1"><a href="#rfc.section.A.1">A.1</a> <a href="#changes.from.rfc.2616">Changes from RFC 2616</a></h2> |
|---|
| 975 | </div> |
|---|
| [1099] | 976 | </div> |
|---|
| [2726] | 977 | <div> |
|---|
| 978 | <h1 id="rfc.section.B"><a href="#rfc.section.B">B.</a> Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication) |
|---|
| 979 | </h1> |
|---|
| 980 | <div> |
|---|
| 981 | <h2 id="rfc.section.B.1"><a href="#rfc.section.B.1">B.1</a> Since RFC2616 |
|---|
| 982 | </h2> |
|---|
| 983 | <p id="rfc.section.B.1.p.1">Extracted relevant partitions from <a href="#RFC2616" id="rfc.xref.RFC2616.2"><cite title="Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1">[RFC2616]</cite></a>. |
|---|
| 984 | </p> |
|---|
| 985 | </div> |
|---|
| 986 | <div> |
|---|
| 987 | <h2 id="rfc.section.B.2"><a href="#rfc.section.B.2">B.2</a> Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-00 |
|---|
| 988 | </h2> |
|---|
| 989 | <p id="rfc.section.B.2.p.1">Closed issues: </p> |
|---|
| 990 | <ul> |
|---|
| 991 | <li><<a href="http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/35">http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/35</a>>: "Normative and Informative references" |
|---|
| 992 | </li> |
|---|
| 993 | </ul> |
|---|
| 994 | <p id="rfc.section.B.2.p.2">Other changes: </p> |
|---|
| 995 | <ul> |
|---|
| 996 | <li>Move definitions of 304 and 412 condition codes from Part2.</li> |
|---|
| 997 | </ul> |
|---|
| 998 | </div> |
|---|
| 999 | </div> |
|---|
| [52] | 1000 | <h1 id="rfc.index"><a href="#rfc.index">Index</a></h1> |
|---|
| 1001 | <p class="noprint"><a href="#rfc.index.3">3</a> <a href="#rfc.index.4">4</a> <a href="#rfc.index.E">E</a> <a href="#rfc.index.G">G</a> <a href="#rfc.index.H">H</a> <a href="#rfc.index.I">I</a> <a href="#rfc.index.L">L</a> <a href="#rfc.index.P">P</a> <a href="#rfc.index.R">R</a> <a href="#rfc.index.S">S</a> |
|---|
| 1002 | </p> |
|---|
| 1003 | <div class="print2col"> |
|---|
| 1004 | <ul class="ind"> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1005 | <li><a id="rfc.index.3" href="#rfc.index.3"><b>3</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| [2726] | 1006 | <li>304 Not Modified (status code) <a href="#rfc.iref.3.1"><b>3.1</b></a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1007 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1008 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1009 | <li><a id="rfc.index.4" href="#rfc.index.4"><b>4</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| [2726] | 1010 | <li>412 Precondition Failed (status code) <a href="#rfc.iref.4.1"><b>3.2</b></a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1011 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1012 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1013 | <li><a id="rfc.index.E" href="#rfc.index.E"><b>E</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1014 | <li>ETag header <a href="#rfc.xref.header.etag.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.iref.e.1"><b>6.1</b></a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1015 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1016 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1017 | <li><a id="rfc.index.G" href="#rfc.index.G"><b>G</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1018 | <li><tt>Grammar</tt> |
|---|
| 1019 | <ul> |
|---|
| 1020 | <li><tt>entity-tag</tt> <a href="#rfc.iref.g.1"><b>2</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1021 | <li><tt>ETag</tt> <a href="#rfc.iref.g.4"><b>6.1</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1022 | <li><tt>If-Match</tt> <a href="#rfc.iref.g.5"><b>6.2</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1023 | <li><tt>If-Modified-Since</tt> <a href="#rfc.iref.g.6"><b>6.3</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1024 | <li><tt>If-None-Match</tt> <a href="#rfc.iref.g.7"><b>6.4</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1025 | <li><tt>If-Unmodified-Since</tt> <a href="#rfc.iref.g.8"><b>6.5</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1026 | <li><tt>Last-Modified</tt> <a href="#rfc.iref.g.9"><b>6.6</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1027 | <li><tt>opaque-tag</tt> <a href="#rfc.iref.g.3"><b>2</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1028 | <li><tt>weak</tt> <a href="#rfc.iref.g.2"><b>2</b></a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1029 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1030 | </li> |
|---|
| 1031 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1032 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1033 | <li><a id="rfc.index.H" href="#rfc.index.H"><b>H</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1034 | <li>Headers |
|---|
| 1035 | <ul> |
|---|
| 1036 | <li>ETag <a href="#rfc.xref.header.etag.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.iref.h.1"><b>6.1</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1037 | <li>If-Match <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-match.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-match.2">6.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.iref.h.2"><b>6.2</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1038 | <li>If-Modified-Since <a href="#rfc.iref.h.3"><b>6.3</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1039 | <li>If-None-Match <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.2">6.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.iref.h.4"><b>6.4</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1040 | <li>If-Unmodified-Since <a href="#rfc.iref.h.5"><b>6.5</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1041 | <li>Last-Modified <a href="#rfc.iref.h.6"><b>6.6</b></a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1042 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1043 | </li> |
|---|
| 1044 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1045 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1046 | <li><a id="rfc.index.I" href="#rfc.index.I"><b>I</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1047 | <li>If-Match header <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-match.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-match.2">6.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.iref.i.1"><b>6.2</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1048 | <li>If-Modified-Since header <a href="#rfc.iref.i.2"><b>6.3</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1049 | <li>If-None-Match header <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.header.if-none-match.2">6.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.iref.i.3"><b>6.4</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1050 | <li>If-Unmodified-Since header <a href="#rfc.iref.i.4"><b>6.5</b></a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1051 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1052 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1053 | <li><a id="rfc.index.L" href="#rfc.index.L"><b>L</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1054 | <li>Last-Modified header <a href="#rfc.iref.l.1"><b>6.6</b></a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1055 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1056 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1057 | <li><a id="rfc.index.P" href="#rfc.index.P"><b>P</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1058 | <li><em>Part1</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part1.1">3.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part1.2">8</a>, <a href="#Part1"><b>10.1</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1059 | <li><em>Section 8.3.1</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part1.1">3.1</a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1060 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1061 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1062 | <li><em>Part5</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part5.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part5.2">6.1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part5.3">6.3</a>, <a href="#Part5"><b>10.1</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1063 | <li><em>Section 5.3</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part5.1">2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part5.2">6.1</a></li> |
|---|
| 1064 | <li><em>Section 5.4</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part5.3">6.3</a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1065 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1066 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1067 | <li><em>Part6</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part6.1">1</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part6.2">6.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part6.3">6.4</a>, <a href="#Part6"><b>10.1</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1068 | <li><em>Section 15.5</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.Part6.2">6.2</a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.Part6.3">6.4</a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1069 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1070 | </li> |
|---|
| 1071 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1072 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1073 | <li><a id="rfc.index.R" href="#rfc.index.R"><b>R</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1074 | <li><em>RFC2068</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.1">3.1</a>, <a href="#RFC2068"><b>10.2</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1075 | <li><em>Section 14.19</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2068.1">3.1</a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1076 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1077 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1078 | <li><em>RFC2119</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2119.1">1.1</a>, <a href="#RFC2119"><b>10.1</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1079 | <li><em>RFC2616</em> <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.1">1</a>, <a href="#RFC2616"><b>10.2</b></a>, <a href="#rfc.xref.RFC2616.2">B.1</a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1080 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1081 | </li> |
|---|
| [1099] | 1082 | <li><a id="rfc.index.S" href="#rfc.index.S"><b>S</b></a><ul> |
|---|
| 1083 | <li>Status Codes |
|---|
| 1084 | <ul> |
|---|
| 1085 | <li>304 Not Modified <a href="#rfc.iref.s.1"><b>3.1</b></a></li> |
|---|
| 1086 | <li>412 Precondition Failed <a href="#rfc.iref.s.2"><b>3.2</b></a></li> |
|---|
| [52] | 1087 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1088 | </li> |
|---|
| 1089 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1090 | </li> |
|---|
| 1091 | </ul> |
|---|
| 1092 | </div> |
|---|
| [2726] | 1093 | <div class="avoidbreak"> |
|---|
| 1094 | <h1 id="rfc.authors"><a href="#rfc.authors">Authors' Addresses</a></h1> |
|---|
| 1095 | <p><b>Roy T. Fielding</b> |
|---|
| 1096 | (editor) |
|---|
| 1097 | <br>Day Software<br>23 Corporate Plaza DR, Suite 280<br>Newport Beach, CA 92660<br>USA<br>Phone: <a href="tel:+1-949-706-5300">+1-949-706-5300</a><br>Fax: <a href="fax:+1-949-706-5305">+1-949-706-5305</a><br>EMail: <a href="mailto:fielding@gbiv.com">fielding@gbiv.com</a><br>URI: <a href="http://roy.gbiv.com/">http://roy.gbiv.com/</a></p> |
|---|
| 1098 | <p><b>Jim Gettys</b><br>One Laptop per Child<br>21 Oak Knoll Road<br>Carlisle, MA 01741<br>USA<br>EMail: <a href="mailto:jg@laptop.org">jg@laptop.org</a><br>URI: <a href="http://www.laptop.org/">http://www.laptop.org/</a></p> |
|---|
| 1099 | <p><b>Jeffrey C. Mogul</b><br>Hewlett-Packard Company<br>HP Labs, Large Scale Systems Group<br>1501 Page Mill Road, MS 1177<br>Palo Alto, CA 94304<br>USA<br>EMail: <a href="mailto:JeffMogul@acm.org">JeffMogul@acm.org</a></p> |
|---|
| 1100 | <p><b>Henrik Frystyk Nielsen</b><br>Microsoft Corporation<br>1 Microsoft Way<br>Redmond, WA 98052<br>USA<br>EMail: <a href="mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com">henrikn@microsoft.com</a></p> |
|---|
| 1101 | <p><b>Larry Masinter</b><br>Adobe Systems, Incorporated<br>345 Park Ave<br>San Jose, CA 95110<br>USA<br>EMail: <a href="mailto:LMM@acm.org">LMM@acm.org</a><br>URI: <a href="http://larry.masinter.net/">http://larry.masinter.net/</a></p> |
|---|
| 1102 | <p><b>Paul J. Leach</b><br>Microsoft Corporation<br>1 Microsoft Way<br>Redmond, WA 98052<br>EMail: <a href="mailto:paulle@microsoft.com">paulle@microsoft.com</a></p> |
|---|
| 1103 | <p><b>Tim Berners-Lee</b><br>World Wide Web Consortium<br>MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory<br>The Stata Center, Building 32<br>32 Vassar Street<br>Cambridge, MA 02139<br>USA<br>EMail: <a href="mailto:timbl@w3.org">timbl@w3.org</a><br>URI: <a href="http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/">http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/</a></p> |
|---|
| 1104 | <p><b>Yves Lafon</b> |
|---|
| 1105 | (editor) |
|---|
| 1106 | <br>World Wide Web Consortium<br>W3C / ERCIM<br>2004, rte des Lucioles<br>Sophia-Antipolis, AM 06902<br>France<br>EMail: <a href="mailto:ylafon@w3.org">ylafon@w3.org</a><br>URI: <a href="http://www.raubacapeu.net/people/yves/">http://www.raubacapeu.net/people/yves/</a></p> |
|---|
| 1107 | <p><b>Julian F. Reschke</b> |
|---|
| 1108 | (editor) |
|---|
| 1109 | <br>greenbytes GmbH<br>Hafenweg 16<br>Muenster, NW 48155<br>Germany<br>Phone: <a href="tel:+492512807760">+49 251 2807760</a><br>Fax: <a href="fax:+492512807761">+49 251 2807761</a><br>EMail: <a href="mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de">julian.reschke@greenbytes.de</a><br>URI: <a href="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/">http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/</a></p> |
|---|
| 1110 | </div> |
|---|
| 1111 | <div id="rfc.copyright"> |
|---|
| 1112 | <h1><a href="#rfc.copyright">Full Copyright Statement</a></h1> |
|---|
| 1113 | <p>Copyright © The IETF Trust (2008).</p> |
|---|
| 1114 | <p>This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the |
|---|
| 1115 | authors retain all their rights. |
|---|
| 1116 | </p> |
|---|
| 1117 | <p>This document and the information contained herein are provided on an “AS IS” basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION |
|---|
| 1118 | HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE |
|---|
| 1119 | DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN |
|---|
| 1120 | WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. |
|---|
| 1121 | </p> |
|---|
| 1122 | </div> |
|---|
| 1123 | <div id="rfc.ipr"> |
|---|
| 1124 | <h1><a href="#rfc.ipr">Intellectual Property</a></h1> |
|---|
| 1125 | <p>The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might |
|---|
| 1126 | be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any |
|---|
| 1127 | license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to |
|---|
| 1128 | identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and |
|---|
| 1129 | BCP 79. |
|---|
| 1130 | </p> |
|---|
| 1131 | <p>Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result |
|---|
| 1132 | of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users |
|---|
| 1133 | of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at <a href="http://www.ietf.org/ipr">http://www.ietf.org/ipr</a>. |
|---|
| 1134 | </p> |
|---|
| 1135 | <p>The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary |
|---|
| 1136 | rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF |
|---|
| 1137 | at <a href="mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org">ietf-ipr@ietf.org</a>. |
|---|
| 1138 | </p> |
|---|
| 1139 | </div> |
|---|
| [52] | 1140 | </body> |
|---|
| 1141 | </html> |
|---|
![(please configure the [header_logo] section in trac.ini)](https://www.ietf.org/images/ietflogotrans.gif)
