Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of WikiStart


Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 20, 2010, 1:43:30 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
mary.ietf.barnes@…
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • WikiStart

    v3 v4  
    2222The process for reviewing documents at Last Call:
    2323
    24 * The Secretary assigns a reviewer, more or less randomly using a round robin order,  within a week of the Last Call announcement – typically on Thursday evenings.
    25 * We expect the reviewer to be done before the end of Last Call.
    26 * The reviewer sends the review to the Gen-ART list
    27 *  The reviewer also sends the review to the AD, WG chairs & authors, and optionally to the WG mailing list.  Since IETF Last Call comments are commonly sent to the IETF discussion list, the reviewer may also choose to do that; in any case the review will be public.
     24 * The Secretary assigns a reviewer, more or less randomly using a round robin order,  within a week of the Last Call announcement – typically on Thursday evenings.
     25 * We expect the reviewer to be done before the end of Last Call.
     26 * The reviewer sends the review to the Gen-ART list
     27 *  The reviewer also sends the review to the AD, WG chairs & authors, and optionally to the WG mailing list.  Since IETF Last Call comments are commonly sent to the IETF discussion list, the reviewer may also choose to do that; in any case the review will be public.
    2828
    2929The process for reviewing documents when they appear on the IESG agenda:
    3030
    31 * Secretary checks the IESG agenda one week before the IESG telechat. The agenda is typically finalized Thursday evening PDT, with late agenda items sometimes being added on Friday morning, thus the assignments are out either late Thursday evening or early Friday morning (PDT).
    32 * For documents reviewed at Last Call, a new review is only asked for if the document is revised or issues resolved.
    33 * The Secretary names a reviewer per document, more or less randomly. For documents that have been reviewed before, the same reviewer is kept, if that person is still available.
    34 * Reviewers send their review to the Gen-ART list no later than COB  (i.e., 8 PM CDT) the Tuesday before the telechat (earlier is better!)
    35 *  Reviews should be copied to authors, responsible ADs and WG chairs, unless the review finds no issues. Also, including a link to the FAQ in the email has proved essential for the recipients of the review in understanding the context.
    36 * If the AD concludes that the concerns raised by the reviewer warrant blocking the document, the AD will do so.
     31 * Secretary checks the IESG agenda one week before the IESG telechat. The agenda is typically finalized Thursday evening PDT, with late agenda items sometimes being added on Friday morning, thus the assignments are out either late Thursday evening or early Friday morning (PDT).
     32 * For documents reviewed at Last Call, a new review is only asked for if the document is revised or issues resolved.
     33 * The Secretary names a reviewer per document, more or less randomly. For documents that have been reviewed before, the same reviewer is kept, if that person is still available.
     34 * Reviewers send their review to the Gen-ART list no later than COB  (i.e., 8 PM CDT) the Tuesday before the telechat (earlier is better!)
     35 *  Reviews should be copied to authors, responsible ADs and WG chairs, unless the review finds no issues. Also, including a link to the FAQ in the email has proved essential for the recipients of the review in understanding the context.
     36 * If the AD concludes that the concerns raised by the reviewer warrant blocking the document, the AD will do so.
    3737
    3838The following aliases can be helpful in getting the reviews to the right targets, replacing  draftname by !draft-ietf-wg-topic  (without -xx version)
     
    5151Each review must include one of the following at the beginning of the review:
    5252
    53 * For Early reviews:
     53 * For Early reviews:
    5454I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-FOOBAR.txt.
    5555
     
    5858Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.
    5959
    60 * For IETF Last Call reviews:
     60 * For IETF Last Call reviews:
    6161I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-FOOBAR.txt.
    6262
     
    6565Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.
    6666
    67 * For IESG Evaluation reviews:
     67 * For IESG Evaluation reviews:
    6868I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-FOOBAR.txt.
    6969
     
    8888
    8989 [RFC1958] The Architectural Principles of the Internet
     90
    9091 [RFC3426] General Architectural and Policy Considerations
     92
    9193 [RFC3439] Some Internet Architectural Guidelines and Philosophy
    92 [NITS] The "I-D Nits" document maintained by the IESG
    93 [RFC2223] Instructions to RFC Authors
    94 [BCP26] Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
    95 [RFC3552] Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations
     94
     95 [NITS] The "I-D Nits" document maintained by the IESG
     96
     97 [RFC2223] Instructions to RFC Authors
     98
     99 [BCP26] Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
     100
     101 [RFC3552] Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations
    96102
    97103as well as any other applicable architectural or procedural documents. It is important that reviews give precise references to such criteria when relevant.