Opened 4 years ago

Last modified 12 months ago

#3 new defect

Two tiny nits

Reported by: superuser@… Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone: Deliverable #3 (changes to DMARC base spec + DMARC Usage Guide
Component: dmarc-future-notes Version:
Severity: - Keywords:
Cc:

Description

To: dmarc@…
From: Anne Bennett <anne@…>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:41:29 -0500
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] ... and two more tiny nits, while I'm at it

Having just spent several hours poring over this document
(-12), I might as well send my additional minor observations.
I suspect that some of you will consider these items trivial,
but they gave me pause as I went back and forth through several
sections of the text to make sure I understood correctly. So...

In "6.6.2. Determine Handling Policy", items 3 and 4, it
would be helpful to make it clear whether only "passed" checks
are passed back from SPF and DKIM to DMARC modules, or only
"pass/fail", or all results including temporary errors.

In "6.6.3 Policy discovery", item 3, I think you mean that
the OD must be looked up if AND ONLY IF the set is now empty.
Otherwise, one does run the risk of ending up with several
records, which item 5 implies is erroneous.

Change History (1)

comment:1 Changed 12 months ago by kboth+ietf@…

  • Component set to dmarc-future-notes
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.