Opened 5 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#12 closed enhancement (fixed)

Determine fate of section 6 last paragraph

Reported by: kboth+ietf@… Owned by: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol@…
Priority: minor Milestone: Deliverable #2 (DMARC improvements to better support indirect email flows)
Component: arc-protocol Version:
Severity: Active WG Document Keywords: arc-protocol wordsmithing
Cc:

Description

From version -11:

[[ Note from Dave: possibly delete the following paragraph as it is more usage/procedural than specification guidance.
KA: It was added to clarify the separation of the verification and signing steps as some of the initial implementations failed to realize that they were not necessarily done in one fell swoop.
KA (v-10): With the addition of the {protocol-elements} section, does the WG think that this can be reasonably removed from this location? ]]

Paragraph in question:

The verifier should save the cv state for subsequent use by any sealing which may be done later (potentially after message modification) within the same trust boundary. The cv state may be recorded by sealing at the time of verification in an initial ARC set (for the ADMD) or may be recorded out of band depending on the architecture of the ADMD.

Change History (1)

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by kboth+ietf@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Cut the first sentence but kept the second with an INFORMATIONAL tag.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.