#106 closed defect (fixed)

Placeholder ticket - References

Reported by: todd.herr@… Owned by: todd.herr@…
Priority: minor Milestone: Deliverable #3 (changes to DMARC base spec + DMARC Usage Guide
Component: dmarc-bis Version:
Severity: - Keywords:
Cc:

Description

What are the rules in markdown for when one should reference an RFC by number, and when by its name?

For instance, there are numerous places in the doc right now that say "[RFC7208]" where "SPF" would read better.

Use this ticket to fix overuse of normative references.

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 22 months ago by todd.herr@…

  • Owner set to todd.herr@…
  • Status changed from new to accepted

comment:2 Changed 20 months ago by todd.herr@…

  • Status changed from accepted to assigned

comment:3 Changed 19 months ago by johnl@…

I'd just add a mention. e.g. "blah blah SPF [RFC7208]."

It's a lot easier to find the references if they're all by RFC number.

comment:4 Changed 13 months ago by todd.herr@…

  • Milestone set to Deliverable #3 (changes to DMARC base spec + DMARC Usage Guide
  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from assigned to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.