Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#7 closed protocol defect (fixed)
CoAP ports
Reported by: | zach@… | Owned by: | zach@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
Component: | coap | Version: | |
Severity: | - | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
The current coap-00 has text on the CoAP port that needs work:
"4.2. Default Port
CoAP SHOULD use a default port of 61616 which is within the compressed UDP port space defined in [RFC4944]. As this port is in the dynamic port space, it however can not be reserved for CoAP use."
On 2010-6-11, at 13:49, Zach Shelby wrote:
I was just about to make a ticket on this Lars. What do you suggest we do here, I mean we can live with ports outside of 61616-61632. Should we define a default CoAP port in the registered range, and then recommend (SHOULD/MUST?) that a port in the LoWPAN range is also supported on 6LoWPAN end-nodes?
Lars:
I think you should definitely (also) ask for a port in the registered range, for deployments that may need this. Whether you want to recommend this port as the default I don't know, because the compression then becomes slightly less efficient.
Change History (1)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by zach@…
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Fixed in coap-01 with the following text: