Opened 8 years ago

#374 new editorial

Expand function set and OMA Object discussion

Reported by: zach@… Owned by: draft-ietf-core-interfaces@…
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: interfaces Version:
Severity: - Keywords:
Cc:

Description

Section 3 currently discusses an example of the use of a function set (RD interfaces) and OMA Objects. These should be expanded into their own sub-sections with more details and discussion. OMA references need to be updated to the final specification and registry. When does it make sense to use a standard object vs. standardise a function set in a spec vs. create a custom function set for a device?

Change History (0)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.