Opened 10 years ago

Closed 10 years ago

#226 closed other technical (fixed)

Clarify which language addresses intermediaries in general vs. forward proxies specifically

Reported by: cabo@… Owned by: hartke@…
Priority: major Milestone: post-WGLC-1
Component: coap Version: coap-09
Severity: In WG Last Call Keywords:


Peter van der Stok notes:

In section 5.7 paragraph 2 mentions that coap requests to proxies specify the request URI in a different way.
I assume that “reverse proxies excepted” needs to be added.


We need to make a run through the document to find which language is specific e.g. to the use of Proxy-Uri, which language addresses intermediaries in general (and maybe differentiate between CoAP-CoAP intermediaries and protocol mappers), and where specifically CoAP forward proxies (in the sense Fielding uses for proxies) are meant.

This is mostly editorial work, but may raise technical points.

Change History (2)

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by zach@…

  • Owner changed from draft-ietf-core-coap@… to hartke@…

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by cabo@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

(This was already declared fixed on Sep 26, but then Trac bumped into a lamppost.)
Fixed in coap-12.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.