![(please configure the [header_logo] section in trac.ini)](https://www.ietf.org/images/ietflogotrans.gif)
Custom Query (43 matches)
Resolution: fixed (43 matches)
| Ticket | Summary | Owner | Type | Priority | Component | Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #311 | Selecting a token length for anti-spoofing | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | critical | coap | coap-15 |
| #286 | Make reference to ECC/CCM DTLS ciphersuite normative | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | major | coap | coap-14 |
| #316 | MUST apply RFC 5280 section 6 as appropriate | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | major | coap | coap-15 |
| #318 | cert-with-PSK: RSA is out, ECDHE is in | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | major | coap | coap-15 |
| #325 | Define curve for keys and certs | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | major | coap | coap-16 |
| #329 | Ambiguity of Accept option still considered a problem | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | protocol defect | major | coap | |
| #331 | No way to indicate preferred size in a 4.13 error | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | protocol enhancement | major | coap | coap-17 |
| #282 | Clarify bytes/characters and UTF-8/ASCII in "Decomposing URIs into Options" | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #283 | Servers vs. Service Discovery | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #284 | Reference terminology from lwig-terminology | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #285 | Make reference to HTTP terms more explicit | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #287 | Add a quick warning that bytewise scanning for a payload marker is not a good idea | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #288 | Make reference to PROBING_RATE explicit | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #289 | Add a forward reference to 5.9.2.9. | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #290 | Mention PROCESSING_DELAY when discussion piggy-backing | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #291 | 8 kbit/s is not "conservative" | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #292 | Add description of resource depletion attack | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #293 | Add description of DoS attack on congestion control | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #294 | Add discussion of using non-trivial token for protecting against hijacking | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-14 |
| #297 | Informative refs in core-coap: groupcomm | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #298 | Small discrepancy about 2.02 Delete | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #301 | Once separate, separate forever | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #302 | Define Cache-key properly | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #303 | Clarify that ACKs don't get retransmitted, the CONs do | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #304 | NON is like separate for CON | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #305 | Don't use decimal response codes, keep the 3+5 structure throughout | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #306 | RFC 2119 usage in 4.5 | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #307 | RFC 2119 usage in 8.2 | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #308 | Make sure all protocol reactions to reserved or prohibited values are defined | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #309 | URI matching rules may be scheme specific | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #310 | Don't dally beyond MAX_TRANSMIT_SPAN during retransmission | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #312 | Discuss spoofing ACKs | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #313 | Qualify partial discard strategy implementation note: UDP only | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #314 | Explicitly point out that UDP and DTLS don't mix | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #315 | Point out security consideration around coap(s) URIs and access control | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #317 | Point out OCSP stapling (TLS Certificate Status Request) as a viable way to get cert status info on a constrained node | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #319 | Point out that requests and responses don't always come in pairs | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #320 | Nail down who does Unicode normalization when (or not) | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #321 | Point out that Uri-Host doesn't handle user-part. | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | editorial | minor | coap | coap-15 |
| #322 | Clarify that security SHOULD be used for issuing secure requests to a proxy | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-16 |
| #323 | Discuss constrained node security considerations, including entropy | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-16 |
| #324 | Discuss key pair generation for RPK | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-16 |
| #326 | Who defines the application profile for PSK identity hints? | draft-ietf-core-coap@… | other technical | minor | coap | coap-16 |
Note: See TracQuery
for help on using queries.
